Category: movement

Der Movement: July 9, 2019

In all cases, emphasis added.

Heddi
Replying to @RichardBSpencer
1) Richard, risk involvement reduces the influx of quality people to exactly ZERO. People who have lives/families to shatter by social ostracism or job loss will not ever involve themselves visibly, thus alt right was anonymous online phenomenon.‏

2) The condition to attract quality people – those who do not come from a “nothing to lose anyway” position – is the erasure of risk. How to do it? Marry risk erasure with incentives of heightened prospects of living conditions. Immerse immediate benefits into joining. Think.

Point number one is fairly obvious but very important, and perhaps not obvious to the grand poohbahs who represent themselves as “movement leadership.”  And this is something I’ve written about before, more than once.  

As far as point two goes, I essentially agree, except that “erasure of risk” is unrealistic. There is risk in everything, even driving a car or walking down a flight of stairs. Obviously, involvement in dissident political/metapolitical activity that is opposed by the entire System, by virtually the entire political spectrum, is going to have inherent risk.  Instead, we should talk of “risk management” and “risk minimization” – far more realistic objectives.  That is opposed to the typical “risk maximization” of Der Movement.  As an example of reasonable minimization, see the 2019 Amren meeting; while Unite the Right, the fate of Ricky Vaughn, Hermansson and Lewis infiltrations, IE Discord, and similar antics exemplify risk maximization.

And as far as incentives go – there are none.  Community building? Resistance to social pricing? Alternative infrastructures and economic viability for low-to-medium scale activists (as opposed to the “Happy Penguins” soaking up the “D’Nations”)?  Camaraderie?  Normalcy?  None of that. Instead we see sour defectiveness, bizarre freakishness, and endless failure.

A comparison between the Type I-style and Type II-style “alpha males” is shown in this short clip from Twin Peaks Season 3. Ray Monroe exemplifies the style of alpha maleness prized by the Type I defectives of “game” such as Roissy – a snide, smirking, sneering, joking, obnoxious jackass.  Mr. C, on the other hand, displays a more Type II-style sense of alpha maleness – aggressive, driven, serious, threatening, focused, with the “alphaness” focused with the “want” vs. “need” distinction.  Note how the two interact – Mr C putting Monroe in his place but the latter refusing to acknowledge it other than a begrudging slight nod and semi-grunt, followed by more of the same annoying jerkboy behavior.

This is a useful contrast because it is the Type I behavior that has led to the downfall of the Alt Right and damaged (American) racial nationalism.  All you need to do is listen to (drunken) “movement” podcasts and read “movement” blog posts and comments threads and you’ll observe Ray Monroes aplenty.  Unfortunately, Mr Cs are few and far between, so the snark to seriousness ratio approaches infinity.

The paradigm of “Sallis is always right” extends to my opinion of Durocher, whose latest inane screed can be found here.  Note the Bliss vs. Malla insanity in the comments thread, which is a direct result of Durocher’s constant shilling of an unscientific, ahistorical, cartoonish Ostara-style version of racial history.  Note then the Nutzi Germanic lunatics, the raging defectives, sweaty fetishists, and all the rest.  It’s no coincidence that such freaks come out of the woodwork with a Durocher post.  As they say – garbage in, garbage out.

Once again Sallis is right – remember this:

Some will object – what about Europe?  They have repressive speech codes and aren’t the national governments there considered legitimate by the people?  First, I can’t speak for rightist Europeans – it is very possible that the growth of populism there is indicative of a growing element that does indeed consider the System illegitimate. And, second, the USA, with its particular history of, and alleged commitment to, free speech, is expected to exhibit a much stronger association between free expression and political legitimacy than do nations that have histories of kings, dictators, strongmen, and laws against lese majeste. What about the argument that European nationalists have had success despite the speech codes there?  What success?  In some nations, there has been a temporary slowdown in the degeneration, which can be quickly reversed by any subsequent leftist government; at best, there have been victories by civic nationalists and moderate petty nationalists. The “grand success” in Europe is a figment of the Nutzi imagination. And I can turn the argument around – imagine how much more successful the European Right could be if they could actually express their real views without fear of being fined or jailed?

So, no, the pathetically flimsy “successes” in Europe – which in any case have limited relevance to the American situation – in no way disprove the thesis put forth here.  Given the concerns of White nationalists, the situation in Europe remains dire. Demographic replacement is still “baked into the cake” there. Can European nationalists freely and frankly discuss these concerns?

So, yeah, I’m sure the vaunted Swedish ethnonationalists will go from victory to victory when it is considered a crime to merely state the desire to deport criminal migrants.  

Laugh at this.  Soporific blog posts?

After a hard day of writing inspirational articles for Counter-Currents (under various pennames)

Multiple pennames? If true, that would help explain the devastating decline of quality at that site.

…I mix myself a drink that consists of vodka, soda water, lots of lime juice, and lots of ice.

What is it with Type I Alt Right and drinking alcohol?

Advertisements

Taylor, Strom, and Russia

In Der Movement.

Another good video by Taylor.  Promoting and defending the concept of White advocacy is obviously a strength of Taylor.

Three brief points.

First, there was never any reason to believe CNN would “play fair,” and I hope people “on our side” will stop believing, and talking to, the press.

Second, Kauffmann is no friend of ours; see here.

Third, European nationalists may not have no choice not to speak about race, given the “hate speech” laws they have there, and the risks of ending up with fines and/or prison sentences for saying or writing the wrong thing.

That said, it is one unfortunate side effect of the despicable EU in that it has soured a feeling of common “Europeaness” among Europeans, particularly those with healthy instincts. Although, to the globalists, that may be a feature, and not a bug, of their EU creation. Turning Europeans against each other has always been a major component of the enemy’s toolkit – said enemy also including the HBDers.

Unfortunately, the level of support given by our readers is insufficient for us to send one representative and speaker, much less two or three as the ICPF would have preferred, to a conference in Moscow. If our readers and listeners step up to the plate, perhaps we can directly participate next year. But we did send a written copy of the speech by Miss Neubauer in lieu of her actual appearance, for distribution to all the attendees, and I will share that speech with you today.

A few points.  

First, this was an excellent speech, with content much in accord with my own views. 

Second, if Neubauer has a husband born in Alaska (now, who can that be?) why is it Miss Neubauer?  

Third, I think that the speech was written by Strom; that is his style and level of intelligence. 

Fourth, if Strom is upset that his group doesn’t have the money to send anyone to Moscow, he should read this. I understand that Strom may not want to be seen as attacking competitors for donations, but the reality is that every dollar that goes to Brimelow and race-mixing Philosemite Derbyshire is a dollar that doesn’t go to Strom and the National Alliance. The “tide raises all boats” theory of potentially unlimited funds to share among activists is, at least for now, a pipedream. If Strom doesn’t confront the HBDers, they’ll continue their grifting ways, parasitizing the “movement,” and leaving behind a dried out husk.

Fifth, and no offense, but the National Alliance has been around for 45 years.  If it is really, as they assert, the leading activist vehicle for European American interests, then why can’t they, after so many years of activity, scrape together the funds to send someone to Moscow? Even a relatively new and small scale operation like Counter-Currents can repeatedly send Johnson to Europe, and yet the vaunted National Alliance is helpless to send at least one individual to a conference in Russia. You can that see my skepticism from last week is justified.

As regards Russia, I know I have readers from that nation, and I hope that most of those are ethnic Russians, and more so, that some are Russian nationalists or, better yet, Russian White nationalists. A brief message to those readers – you may not agree with all I write here, for example some of my criticisms of Putin, Dugin, and Raciology, or my championing of Ukrainian self-determination, but I hope it is clear that, unlike other areas of Western racial nationalism, I am pro-Russian.  Indeed, I am “pro” every European ethny; I do not play favorites.  With respect to Russia, that nation and its civilization has a vital role to play in the future of the White race (if such a future exists) and one can only have admiration for the cultural, scientific, and technical achievements of the Russian people.  As I wrote above, I am in accord with most of the Strom/Neubauer speech.

Countering the Rancid Current

Some truths.

The worst writer in the history of Counter-Currents strikes again.

Where does Johnson find these people?

…any decision-making under conditions of uncertainty is likely to be the opposite of scientific conclusions: allergic to Type 2 errors and tolerant of Type 1 errors.

Tell that to Johnson and Steadman and their “extreme vetting” of meetings.  

If you don’t have the right staff you don’t get the right policies. Indeed. Meet Der Movement.

Ted Cruz shameful? In the convention, maybe. Today, no – Cruz at least speaks up against Antifa violence and the Portland mayor, unlike the fraud Don Trump.

Johnson doesn’t believe Trump was a fraud from the beginning; after all, that would prove Sallis right and Johnson wrong, and we can’t have that. Johnson promotes the lie that Trump could have “cloned Jeb Bush’s platform” and still have won because of his “personality”- can you believe this? In reality, Trump’s campaign took off only after he started talking about Mexican rapists and started attacking the Bush family and their policies.  

What’s laughable is that right after Johnson makes his gaslighting comment, they all admit that people voted for Trump precisely because of his strong talk about immigration (these guys can’t get their stories straight from minute to minute.) – yes, that’s the point.  It was NOT Trump’s personality, which was actually a turn-off for many people who voted for him.  Does anyone believe that Republican voters, including evangelicals, would support a twice-divorced and thrice-married vulgar New York real estate tycoon and reality TV star who talks about his “big hands” and “grabbing pussies” IF this buffoon was merely a neoconservative clone of Jeb Bush?  Does any sane person believe that the enthusiasm that carried Trump to the nomination and then to the Presidency was based on his obnoxious jackass personality, independent of a hardline position on immigration and his America First domestic and foreign policy positions that were articulated during the campaign?

The problem is that these affirmative action “movement leaders” are unable to ever admit that they are wrong. I’m surprised that these types even admit that Hermansson was an infiltrator (although the “leaders” will not take full responsibility for the infiltration) – instead, they could have claimed that Hermansson is actually a double agent burrowing deep into the bowels (no pun intended) of HopeNotHate.

Let’s consider Trump. Let me preface this by saying that we must be careful not to be too Manichean in our view of human nature. It’s not always an orthogonal choice between being a true believer and being a fraud.  Some people are a combination of both.  Was Hitler a rabid anti-Semite or did he use anti-Semitism as a path to power?  Probably both.  Did Stalin truly believe in Marxism or did he use Marxism to achieve power. Probably both. Does Trump have any healthy instincts or is he just a political grifter?  Probably both, again.

It is entirely possible that Trump has some very vague civic nationalist and populist beliefs. But they are likely not important to him, not crucial to his worldview; he is not serious or sincere about any of it in any hardcore, authentic fashion.  He does in fact embody, as Ted Cruz suggested, New York values. He has Jewish family connections, a deep attachment to Israel, and a fondness for Negroes. He is a self-centered narcissist and if he truly cares about anyone other than himself then it likely is his elder daughter Ivanka and no one else. He certainly doesn’t care about his base.  If Trump was (and is) sincere, then why does he ignore his base (e.g., Antifa attacks, State of the Union address), lie to his base (e.g., “the Wall is being built!”) and constantly betray his base (e.g., hiring Neocons, shilling for increased legal immigration, an aggressive foreign policy, pro-Negro “criminal justice reform”)?  The man cares more about pardoning Jack Johnson than he does about his own supporters being physically attacked in the streets and sent to the hospital. His own DOJ persecutes his followers when they defend themselves and ignores the leftist domestic terrorists running wild in the streets.  For Trump to be sincere and commit all his crimes of omission and commission against his base means that the man must be a psychotic retard. However, while he may be vulgar and ignorant, and may be a psychopath, he is not psychotic and he is not retarded.  

Trump wanted to run for President for some reason.  Ego?  To build a rightist media empire after the electoral loss he thought would occur (and very likely desired)? His dislike of Obama and anger at being mocked by Obama?  Whatever the reason, he looked at the Republican field, read Coulter, and had enough sense to realize he needed to give the GOP base some “red meat” to distinguish himself from the Neocons and from Ted Cruz. The more he pushed the envelope, the better he did. It worked better than even he imagined. But if he were sincere, he’s had 2.5 years to give some demonstration of it, and he has done the exact opposite.  He’s not sincere.  He’s a fraud and Johnson was wrong and Sallis was right.

Thus Spoke Costello: Tin Cup Panhandling.  Nietzsche weeps.

Hey, fools, send in those “D’Nations” – these guys need their $100,000.  It will be put to good use, no doubt!

A Lack of Competition

A car analogy.

I’m old enough to remember the days when foreign cars were relatively rare on American roads; most people drove vehicles produced by the big Detroit auto companies.  The quality of those products were horrendous.  Looking back to my childhood, it seems like my father’s cars were having major breakdowns every few months, necessitating costly repairs.  Cars lasted only several years before requiring replacement with another shoddy, shambling half-wreck (and these shoddy replacements were mostly new cars, not used). Everyone else was in a similar situation; a major topic of conversation was what problem your car had today.  My own first car was a used American model, of like kind, which died within several years of low-level use, with complete transmission collapse (literally).

Things changed with the Japanese car invasion.  Not only were the Japanese products themselves of a much higher quality, but the competition forced the American companies to produce cars that didn’t have a planned obsolescence period of three-to-six months.

Now, the alert reader may question my commitment to economic protectionism after these comments (by the way, I seem to remember the protectionist Buchanan being criticized for driving foreign cars), but that is not the point of this post. However, before moving on to the main topic, I will say this – protectionism should not be about preventing all foreign products from having access to the domestic market. High quality foreign products, which exhibit characteristics not typical of native production, should be welcome, if for no other reason as to spur native economic efficiency through the pressure of competition. No, the reason to be protectionist is to protect the domestic market from “competition” of cheap products made by Colored coolie labor, products of no better quality than the native brands (and often of lower quality), but so cheap that they undercut the native producers and drive them out of business.  The only competition there is merely to lower labor costs, not to improve quality, and that undercutting of cost and of a Western standard of living (and hollowing out of the native productive economy) should be targeted by protectionist policies.

And now the main point. I make an analogy between the car situation and “movement” “leadership.”  Just like the old days when there was little to no competition and the American automakers produced absolute trash, Der Movement’s affirmative action policy, and its concomitant lack of accountability, leaves us with “leaders” of the most abysmal character and ability.

All that is required of a Der Movement “leader” is to be of an Anglo-Germanic “Nordish” type, to spout fossilized “movement” dogma, and to seamlessly integrate into the good old boys network. Actual accomplishment, judgment, responsibility, and accountability mean nothing. Quality competition is artificially forced out of the marketplace, leaving the “leaders” no incentive whatsoever for quality control and improvement. They can be wrong about almost everything, make one terrible error after another, be exposed as to have done one unpleasant act after another, be shown to be inept and with questionable  judgment – and there are no consequences. The absolute worst that can happen is that they will be eclipsed by someone else exactly the same as them, who will behave just as badly, making the same errors over and over again.  Fungible incompetence.  Different face, same disgrace.

Obviously, competition is required to spur “movement” “leaders” toward quality control. Someone may ask: Why can’t all the parameters for the Nutzi crowd be met and the competition only come from “movement”-approved ethnicities?  In theory, that is possible; however, in reality, the number of Whites, of any ethnicity, who are of high quality and interested in racial activism is very low.  Most high quality Whites, people of accomplishment and ability, have thrown in their lot with the System and are concerned with their personal interests and status. This is why the “movement’s” affirmative action policy is so pernicious – it artificially constrains an already very limited pool of potential leadership candidates. There is only a handful of such people to start with, and eliminating a significant fraction of these due to affirmative action leaves too few to be sustainable. In the absence of the required sustainable pool of able candidates, we instead get the incompetents, freaks, and grifters. Sure, by making the “movement” more acceptable, weeding out the defectives, you’d create a positive feedback loop moving forward, possibly attracting quality potential leaders of any White ancestral background, including and especially the upper caste ethnicities. But, unfortunately, it seems like you will first need some competent leadership in order to get the virtuous cycle going. So, if competent leadership is the first step, then the whole process is stuck at the present status quo. The logjam must be broken in order to achieve success.

So, if you want the competition required to promote merit, quality, and ability in real leadership for racial activism, you have to open up leadership possibilities for everyone ostensibly part of the ingroup.  Ostensibly is the word, because it seems that some types of folks are around only to provide “D’Nations” or to provide some intellectual heft missing in the “leadership.” These lower-caste individuals are not taken seriously and would never actually be considered as potential leaders, never given that chance in any meaningful way.  

There’s no reason for anyone to get offended by this analysis; it is what it is. I am just reporting the reality. It is doubtful it will change any time soon; the rank-and-file are too invested in maintaining the status quo.  They like it, they support and enable the affirmative action program, so there’s no point trying to do anything about it. Just sit back, watch the Quota Queens ruin all they touch and run the “movement” into the ground, and just shake your head sadly and move on.

Enjoy the endless failure.  Imagine what cars in America would be like if the Japanese invasion never took place. Broken down jalopies spending more time in the repair shop than on the road. Back to the 70s!  The same for a “movement” where real competition for leadership positions is not allowed.

It’s Not All One

Der Movement is not White Nationalism.

Imagine some deluded individual obsessed with promoting “conservativism.”  If you were to tell this conservative that “The Republican Party and conservatism are one and the same; they are the same thing,” what would be his response, assuming that he was of normal intelligence (albeit deluded)?  Something like the following, perhaps:

No, you are wrong.  Conservatism is an ideology, a worldview, what I and others like me are fighting for.  The Republican Party is just that – a political party, the current vehicle for achieving conservatism.  The Republican Party is simply a tool – a very imperfect tool – for actualizing conservative ideals.  True enough, today, it is the only practical vehicle for achieving conservatism, but if and when it ceases to be a suitable vehicle even in an imperfect sense, then conservatives must either retake the GOP or leave it and found a new party according to our principles.

No doubt a progressive liberal type would say the same thing about the Democrats.

Very well.  The principle is the same for Der Movement and White nationalism.  Der Movement is only a vehicle, and it is a failed vehicle that is doing more harm than good.

The last straw for me has been the Trump fiasco and its aftermath in Der Movement, the latest in an endless series of Man on White Horse humiliations for the Type I retards of racial activism.  I had correctly identified Trump as a fraud and a buffoon in the year leading up to the election, and had also identified the only reason to give him support – the public misperception of him as a “racist fascist” was – and is – an important driver for promoting chaos and balkanization and destabilizing the multicultural consensus.

But, no, Der Movement had other ideas.  Trump was The God Emperor, the Last Chance for White America, an American Caesar Who Shall Stabilize White Demographics, a sincere hero bestowing upon us some “safe space” to expand the ever-growing success of racial activism. Pepe!  Kek!

And upon the utter collapse of that narrative, none of these no-character defectives has the moral courage, the integrity, the internal strength and fiber, to admit being wrong and to take responsibility and be held accountable. Oh no, it’s just “Fuck Trump” following by endorsements of Chinaman King Andy Eggroll and semi-Samoan Princess Tulsi Coconut, it is snide cartoons of Trump as some sort of esoteric Lovecraft monster, it is endless feuding and airing of dirty laundry, etc.

And that’s added to the Unite the Right and IE/Discord fiascos, infiltrations, gossiping about perversions and drug use, the whole stupid litany of failure and embarrassment.

So, no, Der Movement and White nationalism are NOT one and the same.  Der Movement is not (and never was) any sort of even semi-effective vehicle for achieving racial nationalist objectives.  It’s a failure and needs to be replaced.

Advice for Young WNs: The Military

Advice.

Some time ago I gave some advice here to WNs, particularly young WNs. I need not recapitulate that post, but it centered on advice you’ll never hear from the Quota Queen Grifters – that activists should prioritize themselves, their health, their education, their careers, and their families, etc., before investing in the “movement.”

Speaking of education and careers, what about the military? From a WN perspective, there are pluses and minuses to that choice, but the purpose of this post is not to analyze that perspective. If we assume that a young White man is interested in signing up, perhaps for the minimum duty period, to learn skills, earn some money, get set up for future education or career choices, then how should they approach the situation if they are also interested in White racial activism?

This is an important topic nowadays, as one sees many news stories about how the military is cracking down against WNs in the ranks, dishonorably discharging those identified, and is being egged on by politicians and activists to do even more to identify, punish, humiliate, and discharge White soldiers with politically incorrect views.  Why can’t proud White men have the opportunity to serve their country in an honorable fashion and improve their lives?  Don’t they have the same rights as everyone else?

Advice needs to be given. What follows is going to be so simple, so obvious, so much centered on plain common sense, that I am almost embarrassed to write it.  But, alas, based on recent news stories, it is all too necessary, as simple and obvious common sense evades many young Whites who find themselves in untenable situations when their very public activism collides head on with their military service.  Common sense is eschewed, prudence is unheard of, and all the heroic “movement leaders” – obsessed as they are with maximizing their “D’Nations” – fail to provide even the most basic of advice to their followers.

Thus:

If you are a young White man with a growing interest in White nationalism, and if you are seriously considering joining the military, then you must absolutely eschew being any sort of overt activist before joining, and even more absolutely, avoid any participation in “movement” activity while performing your service. Do your time, learn your skills, earn your money and whatever other benefits, get your honorable discharge, and THEN if you so choose get involved in racial activism to the extent you wish, according to your particular circumstances (e.g., your post-military career may be one that necessitates continued secrecy and prudence).

FIRST you join up, serve your time, earn what you can, and get honorably discharged, and THEN, if you so wish, get involved in racial activism.  Do NOT be an overt activist before joining, and, please, do NOT ever engage in activism while in uniform.  

Note the last part. Obey the rules and regulations of the service. Do not proselytize, do not recruit, do what you are supposed to do.  Serve your country.  Do not cause problems. Put it all in suspended animation.

To put it another way – do NOT be a White nationalist while serving in the military. Completely forget about the ideology, adopt civic nationalism, reject Der Movement and all its works. Take a hiatus.  Rethink your views. Once you go back to civilian life, if you still have an interest in White activism, then, fine, do it.  But only then.  Don’t ruin things for yourself by being a retarded Nutzi.

Back in the 1990s, people may have been able to get away with a degree of overt pro-White racialism in the military, but not today.  Note that America lurches to the Left to a greater degree during the Presidencies of “extreme right-wing Republicans” (sic) like Reagan and Trump; what flew under the radar (to an extent, before it became too extreme and violent) under Clinton is not going to fly decades later under Trump. Again, if you choose to serve, you should respect the rules and regulations of your service and reject racialism while in uniform.

And what if you already have become an overt activist and you want to join the military?  I would seriously urge you to rethink that choice.  The chances of it ending well decrease with each passing day in the Far Left Dystopia that America has become, and is becoming to an ever increasing degree.

The same basic advice of this post applies to other early career choices that can be negatively affected by an overt connection to Der Movement – e.g., non-military government service, medical school, the corporate world, teaching, academia (e.g., Duchesne), etc.  

WN 3.0 Marches On

In all cases, emphasis added.

Remember Greg Johnson’s statement:

Greg Johnson

Posted March 6, 2018 at 8:46 pm | Permalink

Sadly, Occidental Dissent has now embraced “hard right” black-pilling and self-marginalization.

White Nationalism 3.0 will be hammered out by Counter-Currents and advocates of American Nationalism like James Allsup, Identity Europa, Anglin and Weev, and Mike Enoch

How is that WN 3.0 doing these days?  Good judgment (once again) there Greg:

A federal judge has awarded $4.1 million to a Muslim-American radio host who accused a neo-Nazi website operator of falsely accusing him of terrorism. 

U.S. District Court Judge Edmund Sargus Jr. had previously agreed to enter a default judgment against The Daily Stormer founder Andrew Anglin and his company.

Unlike the tin cuppers, I have no financial incentive of donations to tell (i.e., lie to) all of you about how great it’s all going for Der Movement, and how victory is at hand.  Instead, I tell you hard truths – the “movement” is going from defeat to defeat, abject failure to abject failure, embarrassment to embarrassment, and utter humiliation to utter humiliation.

And let’s not forget this little tidbit:

A motion Obeidallah’s attorneys filed in February noted that one of Andrew Anglin’s accounts received more than $198,000 in donations between February 2016 and October 2018. A third-party tracker also estimated that Anglin received more than $378,000 in Bitcoin, the motion said.

If this is true, then Anglin is giving Petey a run for his shekels.  Imagine if that money went elsewhere. Imagine if those donations went to Salter, allowing him to concentrate on research and writing to extend and expand his work on EGI and ethnic conflict.  Imagine that money was invested in a dividend fund, yielding several thousands of dollars of income per year, which could be used for various projects, while the principle is maintained. Imagine the money was spent to help buy a property that could be used for meetings, conferences, and organizing. Imagine it was spent building a legal apparatus or some other sort of needed infrastructure.  Yes, imagine, and all you’ll be doing is imagining, because while the “crazy and bitter” Sallis has those ideas for that money, the big-brained Inner Hajnal heroes running your “movement” obviously have quite different ideas on what to do with dem dere “D’Nations.”

How’s that affirmative action program working out for all of you?  Keep on giving, moneybags!

Very cognitive, very elite.  Remember, it has long been EGI Notes that has preached to you that the existential meaning of Asians is hatred of Whites.  And they openly admit it:

Greg Johnson:

It was nine years ago today that the Counter-Currents website went online. I can’t count the number of writers, YouTubers, podcasters, websites, and entire movements that have come and gone in our ideological sphere in the last nine years. The attrition is understandable. Deplatforming, demonetization, and demoralization take their toll.

Let’s rewrite for added accuracy:

It was nine years ago today that the Counter-Currents website went online. I can’t count the number of writers that have come and gone on our website in the last nine years. The attrition is understandable. Demoralization, disgust, betrayal, and banning of writers take their toll.

Just replace “Lite” with “Right” and you’re 100% correct.

Another shallow Counter-Currents post by one of the horrifically bad new crop of “writers” there. Yeah…if that thesis  is correct, then White women would be flocking to support, and have sex with, “fascists.”  Is this the case?