Category: movement

Two Levels of Insurgency

Outer and inner.

Any student of insurgency, of warfare against a stronger power, of guerrilla tactics, of dissent opposition, understands that the fundamental strategic objective of the insurgency is to maintain its existence.

Insurgent armies will often avoid full frontal assault against the entrenched power, will engage in hit-and-run tactics that weaken that enemy while preserving the existence of the insurgent force.  The mere continued existence of the insurgency, in the face of a more powerful enemy, is itself a victory, it undermines the power of the enemy and the confidence of the people in that power, and it allows the insurgency to exist to fight another day.  As long as the insurgency exists, it has the potential for overcoming the enemy, if by attrition if by no other mechanism.  The continued existence of the insurgency will attract followers, it will allow for growth and adaption, it may attract the support of other powers; this is why the enemy state prioritizes the complete elimination of the insurgency – “containment” is not good enough, it is an admission of defeat – and why the insurgency itself puts a premium on existence.  Thus, the brilliant strategy of George Washington in the American Revolution, the Fabian Strategy (despite the negatives that strategy can bring and Washington’s own frustration at his critics), that allowed the Colonial army to survive in the field long enough so that important foreign support, and eventual victory, was achieved.

In this context, the Outer Insurgency is that of racial nationalists/nationalists/Far Right against the System, against the globalists.  Priority number one has to be continued existence of the Far Right opposition; after all, if you do not exist, you will be unable to eventually come to power yourself.  At the current time, the power imbalance between the Far Right and the System requires the former to engage in a Fabian strategy and guerilla tactics against the latter, a form of memetic/political/metapolitical ju-jitsu to use the clumsy bulk power of the System against itself.  A wonderful example of this is the “It’s OK to be White” meme, which puts the System in a lose-lose situation. If the System ignores the meme, ignores the posters and leaflets, then it displays weakness and emboldens imitators and others to push the memetic envelope further; if the System acts against the meme, then it “heightens the contradictions” and makes people wonder: “why isn’t it OK to be White?”  The System is forced to choose between being weak and being openly anti-White in a ham-fisted manner; the System cannot simply say, “Yes, it is OK to be White,” since the System’s entire foundational ideology is anti-Whiteness.  That’s a form of ideological guerilla warfare, a memetic insurgency, which attacks the System at its ideological core without putting the existence of the still-weak insurgency at risk.  Priority one: existence.  Priority two: attack and undermine the opposition. Leading to priority three: systematically replace the opposition and achieve power.

The second form of insurgency – the Inner Insurgency?  That’s the insurgency within the “movement” itself; relatively weak dissidents, presented by EGI Notes for example, staking out a niche in opposition to the (in relative terms) clumsy ham-fisted “movement,” which needs to be critiqued and undermined. Thus, it is the first priority for the Inner Insurgency to survive, to have a continued existence, to engage in a Fabian Strategy when necessary, to mimic on a smaller internal scale the same struggle that is taking place on a larger scale at the level of the Outer Insurgency of Der Movement vs. The System.

The “movement” has made this Inner Insurgency necessary by not engaging in the necessary reforms and by not giving dissidents “a place at the table” to bring their legitimate grievances to be aired without being summarily dismissed or labeled “crazy.”

Indeed, this “craziness” derives from the same source as consistently being correct about things, recognizing problems at an early stage, and realizing trends before they become apparent (if they ever do) to the “sane” among us.

I attempt to view things as they are, without sentimentality, or pity, or self-delusion, or moral posturing, or dogma, to get to the core of an issue, understand it, and project trends going forward.

This of course gets me into trouble both in Der Movement and in “real life,” as I come up against people (the vast majority of people fit into this category) who view things through one prism or another of the aforementioned characteristics that distorts their vision, often giving them whatever picture they want to see, or one that comfortably fits into moral conformity and social acceptability.  To them, I’m “crazy” or “bitter” or “impossible” or “autistic” or “cruel” or “cold” or whatever other ad hominem critiques of my character (some of which may have a kernel of truth) that enables the people in question to disregard my message and feel good about their own delusions.  Also, by disparaging my character, these people don’t have to engage with the unpleasant reality that I’m right in my prognostications 99+% of the time.  Rather than dealing with the hard realities inherent in a truthful message, the weak-minded turn their fear and frustration against the messenger.

I am of course not infallible and do make error; this is usually when I am relatively uninterested in an issue or outcome and do not dissect too deeply into it.  For example, I was wrong about Trump’s chances of being elected in 2016; however, while that was important, it wasn’t an issue of deep existential concern for me.  My real interest was how the Trump campaign was affecting the political, social, cultural, and moral climate in America, its potential to promote racial balkanization and sociopolitical chaos, and the long-term effects of Trump on future populist/racialist “demagogues.”  Much of my predictions in this regard have come true, and we’ve seen the spectacle of System hacks like Frank Rich repeating certain points of my The Nazi Next Time essay two years after I wrote it.  So it goes….

The Inner Insurgency continues.

Crush the Infamy!


You Are All to Blame

Gross dysfunction in Der Movement enabled by all you Type I activists out there.

Read here, emphasis added:

Heimbach was charged with assaulting his wife and his wife’s stepfather, Matt Parrott, who is also co-founder of Heimbach’s Traditionalist Worker Party. The organization is described by the Southern Poverty Law Center as a new white nationalist group masking itself in “traditionalism.”
About 1 a.m. Tuesday morning, Parrott, 36, called police from a Walmart in Paoli, Ind., according to a police report obtained by the SPLC. Parrott told police he had fled to the Walmart with his stepdaughter after a confrontation with Heimbach, who had allegedly been involved in an affair with Parrott’s wife. The stepdaughter told police that the affair had lasted three months but had recently ended.
But that night, according to the police report, Parrott caught Heimbach with his wife. He confronted Heimbach and told him to get off his property, but Heimbach wouldn’t leave. Parrott poked his chest, then Heimbach allegedly grabbed Parrott’s hand and twisted it down. Heimbach got behind Parrott and “choked him out” with his arm, according to the police report.
Parrott told police he briefly lost consciousness. When he woke up, he again told Heimbach to get off his property, and Heimbach again tried to choke him, according to the police report. Parrott again lost consciousness, and upon waking up heard his wife tell Heimbach to track down his stepdaughter’s phone because it had a recording of Heimbach and Parrott’s wife together, according to the police report. Parrott and the stepdaughter escaped to the Walmart.
After police met Parrott at the Walmart, they left to track down Heimbach, and found him in a verbal confrontation with his own wife. Heimbach’s wife told police that her husband grabbed her face and “threw me with the hand on my face onto the bed.”

An analysis of the situation is here.

It goes without saying that I’ve been critical of Parrott for a long time, and once I learned about Heimbach’s antics, sharply critiqued him here.

Question: was there any leftist journalist “embedded” at the Parrott-Heimbach homestead to record all of this drama?

Another question: when are all you nitwits out there going to DEMAND an end to the travesty known as Der Movement, Inc?

Course Correction

A realization of utter failure?

Listen here.

Hey, Richard, at least read this.  Even if you disagree with its premises and conclusions 100%, at least by formulating why you think it is wrong it will assist in your course correction and redirection.

More fundamentally: any strategy and every event needs to be very, very carefully planned, with every contingency covered.

With all your talk of having “fun” at events, don’t you guys get it yet?  It’s war; it is not supposed to be “fun.”  If you want to have access to the public space, which you are being denied by FORCE, you need to use EQUAL OR SUPERIOR FORCE to take back your “right” to access that space.  If the opposition is “willing to go more far” in their actions than you or any other group, they win and you lose.

And, yes, it’s true, Antifa is being protected and enabled by the Establishment.  Now, who is in charge of Federal law enforcement in America?  Donald J. Trump and Jeff Sessions.  Think about that.  Think carefully: during the Obama administration, would Far Right groups have been allowed to openly (illegally wearing masks by the way) engage in domestic terrorism?  Would Far Right groups have been allowed to openly organize on campuses, armed and dangerous?  Would Far Right groups have been allowed to intimidate non-Whites moving into White neighborhoods?

Yet, Trump and Sessions allow Antifa to run wild in the streets, they allow Far Left armed groups to form on campuses, and they allow the Far Left to intimidate and attack Whites who “gentrify” non-White neighborhoods.

Who is the real enemy here?

So, I will agree with the excuse that it’s not really Alt Right vs. Antifa, it is Alt Right vs. Antifa + Establishment, with Trump and Sessions being on the side of Antifa (their unwillingness to perform their law enforcement role is functionally equivalent to complicity with the Far Left).

This is a tough nut to crack – the institutional racism against Whites, structural racism against European-Americans, the fact that Antifa is indirectly and implicitly supported by the entire American Establishment, including “fascist bigots” (sic) like Trump and Sessions.

At the very least, the Alt Right should have enough decency and self-respect to call a spade a spade and “call out” the ultra-leftist, White-hating Trump and his buffoonish, inept Attorney General for conspiring with the Far Left to deprive White Americans of their constitutional right of public assembly.  That would not, of course, solve the problem, but it would at least name the problem, recognize the problem, and you cannot solve any problem that you are unable to even recognize.

The God Emperor is functionally equivalent to Head Bolshevik and Mr. Magoo Howdy Doody is also complicit, through his utter and complete inaction, with the Far Left’s domestic terrorism.

While Spencer attempts to figure out what to do next, why doesn’t he at least mentally toughen up and admit the facts of the case?

In a real sense, following this line of argument to its logical conclusion, Donald Trump and Jeff Sessions are the de facto leaders of Antifa. If not them, then who? If they wanted, Trump and Sessions could solve all of Spencer’s problems overnight, and only by strictly following the letter of the law, simply by doing their jobs and fulfilling their minimal obligations. That’s not even being “pro-Nazi” – it’s simply them stopping putting their thumbs on the scale in favor of Antifa.  But they refuse to do so.  It’s doesn’t really matter why – it matters what.  And the reality of what is, as stated: Donald Trump and Jeff Sessions are the de facto leaders of Antifa

Two brief final points.

First, readers of this blog will question why I bother to give advice to Spencer and the Alt Right, since I have expressed my opposition to the Alt Right “movement.”

My answer is simple.  On a personal level, I’m a disinterested actor here. I don’t care about “movement personalities” as people, one way or the other; I have nothing invested in personal feuds (of which we know of several currently extant in Der Movement).  My interest is solely focused on ideas and actions and how these people influence ideas and actualize those idea through action. I have no personal ambition to be any Grand Poohbah or Fearless Leader in Der Movement; in any case, those roles are strictly apportioned through Der Movement Affirmative Action Program, from which I am barred. Thus, if any “movement” personality actually shapes up and starts doing well, then I’ll support them and more power to them.  If they screw up, if they promote maladaptive, destructive ideas, then I’ll criticize them. I give advice to be helpful, in the forlorn hope that someday one of these heroes will actually listen.

And my approach – judging people based on their ideas and actions – is better than the way they do things – which is to judge ideas and actions based on what they think of the people who espouse them.  For example, after the Johnson-Spencer feud became “hot,” mysteriously Johnson became a rabid ethnonationalist with an anti-Russian flavor, while Spencer’s previously tolerant attitude toward homosexuality suddenly vanished.  All a coincidence, I guess.

Second, I would suggest that those on the Far Right have long memories.  If and when the wheel turns, and the power shifts more in our direction, we should be as intolerant to the Left as they are to us.  No – more so, since we have Truth and Justice on our side.  Everything they do now should be returned with interest, returned a thousand-fold.

Addendum: Does being “selective” (something is better than nothing) contribute at least to some extent to what was a minor success?

Of course, that’s an order of magnitude less selectivity than is needed.

Stick a Fork In It

The dying Alt Right and Alt Wrong.

Tenold is a Norwegian Leftist journalist who has spent the last six years “embedded” with the National Socialist Movement, KKK groups, and the Traditionalist Workers Party. The result is basically a book about Matt Heimbach, whose grand strategy, at least in its first phase, is to create a coalition of skinhead, Klan, and National Socialist groups under the TWP banner. We’ll never know what phase two is.

Let us understand this completely in all its implications.  A “Leftist journalist” – by definition, an avowed enemy of White racial interests – spent six years (SIX YEARS!) “embedded” within a number of Far Right groups, and then, using this experience and the inside information thus accumulated, wrote an anti-White “hit piece” book about the “movement.”

Friends and readers, Der Movement, Inc. is worse – far, far, worse – than even I ever imagined or ever wrote about.  It’s worse than a mere clownshow – it’s Pennywise of  King’s novel It – it is the embodiment of sickness and evil and all of you Type I scumbags out there – yes, scumbags, if you are one of those people – are fully responsible for enabling this outrageous disaster.

In case there’s any confusion:


Posted March 7, 2018 at 1:31 pm | Permalink

Wait a second – Heimbach actually ALLOWED this guy to hang around for years? He wasn’t undercover or so?

Greg Johnson

Posted March 7, 2018 at 4:02 pm | Permalink

Yes, he allowed this guy to hang around knowing who he is.

And for six years.  SIX YEARS!  I mean, the Hermansson infiltration was a result of ineptness and Nordicist fetishism and the Lewis infiltration was a result of ineptness and movie fetishism, but those, as bad as they were, were inadvertent errors.  This – this! – was intentional, with malice aforethought.

Hailgate, the cringe-inducing fall of Eli Mosley, and now this terrible book — and I am sure many scandals to come — are all predictable results of crawling into bed with the press.

No, Greg, they are the “predictable results” of the inherent flaws in the Alt Right, Alt Wrong, and Big Tent approaches, with only a few of us (mostly I but to some extent Strom as well) questioned and critiqued.  I PREDICTED the problems and downfall of the Alt Right BEFORE these events happened.

So why do they keep doing it? Why are they such promiscuous attention whores?

Years ago, Matt Parrott told me the cynical strategy behind Heimbach’s active press engagement, and I suspect that similar calculations drive Spencer as well. According to Parrott, most people in this movement lack the “self-esteem” and judgment to choose their own leaders. Instead, they allow the press and groups like the SPLC to anoint their leaders for them. Therefore, if one wants to become a White Nationalist leader, one must court the press and the SPLC.

How does one court the press? By giving them what they want, of course. By fulfilling the stereotypes that advance the enemy’s narrative. Thus Heimbach cheerfully incarnates the fat redneck, while Spencer plays the evil WASP snob. Thus Heimbach and Spencer have a symbiotic relationship with the enemy media. The media love Heimbach and Spencer, because they help cast White Nationalism in a negative light, and Heimbach and Spencer love the media because they believe it will elevate them over their rivals in the movement.

Regardless of my disagreements with Johnson, I’ve never doubted his honesty regarding incidents like this, so I do not doubt that Parrott told Johnson something like what is reported here. Whether or not those comments accurately reflect Heimbach’s thinking on the matter I do not know. But let’s assume for the sake of argument that everything Parrott said is correct and that Johnson’s interpretation of it is also correct.

Yes, Johnson’s outrage is therefore justified. The “leaders” here are outrageous.  But who enabled them?  Der Movement’s Type I rank-and-file are primarily responsible, make no doubt about it, the sort of brainless losers who “lack the ‘self-esteem’ and judgment to choose their own leaders…they allow the press and groups like the SPLC to anoint their leaders for them.”  And Heimbach and company are not the only ones who have done this; I can think of past and present “WN 1.0” “leaders” with a symbiotic relationship with the SPLC just as today’s majestically heroic “WN 2.0 leaders” exhibit..

And although I’ll never reveal – much less on a public forum – confidential details of incidents I personally experienced or otherwise know about, just in the broadest and most vague terms, I can say that there is (at least) one incident of which I am aware that a well-known “movement leader” (past or present, it doesn’t matter) did something unpleasant (for which there were legal consequences, but only locally), something that would reflect badly on their character and “turn off” supporters, something that it is virtually 100% certain that the “watchdog groups” knew about, but they (the “watchdogs”) never – not once – publicized it or commented on it in any way.  That certainly raised my eyebrows – a dastardly hater being protected by the “watchdogs.”  Why?

A paranoid interpretation would have been that the “leader” is/was a mole, but I doubt that.  It’s much simpler than that. I believe it was because the “watchdogs” value/valued the individual in the “leadership” role that he has/had.  He is/was inept and useless, so much the better to impede racialist progress.  You wouldn’t want anyone more competent (if you could find one in Der Movement) in charge, would you?  Also, the individual is/was a good bogeyman to scare old rich Jews into making donations to the “watchdogs.”  A symbiotic relationship indeed.

By the way, Greg Johnson is also culpable, for supporting the Alt Right as long as he did, and by dismissing critics such as myself as “crazy and bitter.”

I guess foresight is crazed insanity and good judgment is bitterness, according to all of our fearless leaders.

More to the point: anyone and everyone who thinks that “business as usual” is acceptable for racial activism is complicit in this continuously unfolding disaster.  When will all of you stand up and cry enough?  Stand up like men and take the “movement” away from those who so obviously misuse and abuse it.

The MSU speech only took place under the most extreme difficulty and duress. Once again, outrageous legal challenges were thrown in our path and overcome. Once again, our people were harassed and targeted like criminals as they attempted to peacefully gather for harmless social gatherings. Private venues were threatened and shut down. Mobs of armed anarchists, openly chanting about “punching Nazis” as they burned American flags, were allowed to attack our people with impunity as the police stood by and watched.

This time, the establishment cleverly targeted our strongest legal advocates before they moved in for the kill. With our lawfare defenses down, the police were free to let the antifa horde attack our people in what has been called another “mini-Charlottesville.”

We were promised a secure parking area and that our ticket-holding event attendees would be protected into and out of the auditorium. Instead, our people were led by police directly into a communist trap. Our people were told by campus police they had to march through the horde of masked thugs to reach the venue.

Why did these people think that any of these promises would be honored?  Haven’t they learned their lesson from previous fiascos? Why are they so naive?

Richard Lynn does not represent “objective science.”  Lynn is a charlatan, a pseudoscientist, an HBDer who grovels to the Altar of Asia.

He should not be stripped of any title for political reasons; instead he should simply be mocked or ignored as the pathetic fraud that he is. If nothing else, his laughable method for “estimating” Irish IQ – averaging completely disparate data sets to achieve a finding that “just happens to” correlate with GDP – should forever disqualify him from being in any way associated with “objective science.”  Non-scientists may shrug at that and say “so what?” but authentic scientists would be shocked at Lynn’s clumsy incompetence (assuming it is merely incompetence).

One can only imagine the tearful hysterical praise that will spew forth from Der Movement when the doddering decrepit Lynn finally drops dead. It will outstrip that for Phil “French Army Surgeon” Rushton, and far outstrip the minimal whimpers for Chris “Yellow Fever” Brand. On a related note, one wonders which HBD retard was “Hippocrates” of Amren?  Rushton?  Brand?  Or someone unfortunately still living like Hart?  A more minor figure?  We also can’t put it past Lynn to praise his own work pseudononymously, or for one of his collaborators to do so.  Given that the HBDers are for the most open and public figure, the pseudonymous aspect of “Hippocrates” raises questions about potential conflicts of interest.  

The pathetic sniggering Eurotrash retardates of the Europa Weekly podcast, ultra-fetishists with sweaty obsessions, can take a look at this reasonable summary of genetic data.  And for their viewing pleasure is an example of an Afrowop hook nose – individual on the left.  No, wait….

The Strategic Objective

Nietzsche’s child rather than lion (or camel) – a constructive thesis.

Let’s first consider two points that form the foundation of the thesis of this post.

Point 1. A primary objective of terrorism and guerrilla warfare is to provoke repressive measures from the government, which will negatively affect the population, alienating and radicalizing that population, and turning them against the government.

This is generally true, and as I recall was favorably mentioned by Pierce in The Turner Diaries.

Note that while this statement derives from historical examples of political violence, it can also apply to memetic “terrorism” and “warfare” as well.  Thus, discussion of Point 1 does not in any way imply advocacy of actual physical terrorism or guerrilla warfare (which are, by the way, primarily performed by the political Left), but instead illustrates the point – the historically demonstrated fact – that provoking a government to repress its people typically generates hatred of the people toward that government, to the benefit of the adversaries of that government.

Point 2. Revolutions typically do not take place during the time of the greatest repression, but rather occur when that repression is suddenly relaxed.

This point (previously mentioned at this blog) is also generally true.  Note that the System either consciously or unconsciously recognizes this to be so, since its reaction to Trumpism and the brief rise of the Alt Right has been to viciously double down on the repression and on its anti-White narrative. They have absolutely rejected the path of concessions and reconciliation.

Obviously, Points 1 and 2 are not fully compatible with each other, which allows a prudent strategy of provocation to present to the System a dilemma manifested by a choice between two unpleasant, and ultimately destructive, alternatives.

If the System responds to Far Right provocations with increasing repression – and it is fundamentally important that the repression must be distributed among at least a sizable fraction of the White population and not just tightly targeted to the Far Right – then it will alienate and radicalize that portion of the population (Whites) on which the System’s own effective function, and its overall long-term viability, depends.  The System will lose moral authority as it props itself up by using the same terror it purports to fight.  

With the loss of moral authority comes more resistance, and while Revolution per se may not occur during this period of great repression, the loss of moral authority, and the cycle of repression, hatred, resistance, and more repression cannot go on forever. Eventually a breaking point will be reached in which the System can no longer be tenable while repressing and attacking the very population necessary for ensuring the System’s efficient maintenance; the System will either break down and collapse under the weight of what is essentially a runaway, and ultimately fatal, autoimmune reaction (i.e., attacking its own body after being exposed to an antigen), or it will be forced to attempt to salvage the situation by making concessions, leading us to Point 2. 

On the other hand, if the System wants to avoid the scenario of Point 1, sensing that if it pushes Whites too far and too fast it will eventually lose everything, or if tries repression and it fails, and it starts making concessions (relaxing the repression, Point 2), then the System loses moral authority by looking weak, tacitly admitting that its Far Right adversary has legitimacy, and admitting that White interests and White opposition to the System are at least partially valid.  This will lead to a “snowball” effect as increasing concessions lead to increasing legitimacy for White demands and thus further concessions, undermining the System’s whole raison d’etre of anti-Whiteness.  

As long as the Far Right is prudent enough to keep up the pressure, keep up the demands, keep up the provocations, keep up the memetic war, keep on “heightening the contradictions,” then the loss of moral authority for the System will become irreversible and lead to the loss of political, economic, and social authority as well.  Keep in mind that Coloreds, with their sense of entitlement and hatred of Whites, will see any concessions to White interests as a betrayal by the System (which they see, all grievance rhetoric aside, as THEIR System), further weakening the System’s moral authority, and making the System have to choose between placating sets of incompatible tribal interests. The endpoint is collapse, perhaps from different mechanisms as the collapse of Point 1, but collapse nevertheless.

The System would try to solve this dilemma by doing what it is doing now – attempting to specifically target repression to a relatively small subset of Whites, including the Far Right itself, while slowing down White dispossession enough so as to “boil the frog slowly.”  More recently, with the hysterical reaction to Trumpism, this strategy is starting to fray, and repression is more and more leaking out to the general White population.  In a very real sense, that general repression has always been with us – forced integration, affirmative action, racial double standards, mass immigration, political correctness, social pricing, hate crimes laws, hate speech laws in Europe, etc. – but it is becoming more obvious now.  This demonstrates the validity of this post’s general thesis – if something as mild as Trumpism, and as inept as the Alt Right, could provoke the System as much as it has, and “dropped the mask” to the general White population, what would a serious and strategic strategy of (memetic) Far Right provocation achieve?  Thus, any movement would need to create conditions so that backlash against it would affect Whites outside of that movement, so as to put “in play” the various processes outlined in this post. For example, serious and authentic community activism and political engagement would create ties between the Far Right and the broader White population, so that repression targeted at the former would be necessity negatively affect the latter.  Of course, we need intelligent, disciplined, and rational Type II activists to plan these strategies; Type I activists have demonstrated, time and again, their inability to effectively manage (or even attempt) these approaches.

Before we conclude with an outline of things to do, let us briefly consider: how could an alternative System – for example, a racial nationalist System – avoid being placed in the sort of dilemma outlined here?  Simple: by representing the interests of the people, by supporting majority rights rather than that of minorities, by making Whites into authentic stakeholders in the System and its well-being.  Whites have long since stopped being authentic stakeholders in the current System, in any real sense, long ago.

What to do? The following have been discussed at this blog in detail previously, but briefly we can summarize:

1. Build a legionary cadre.  No defectives, no Alt Right lulzers, no obsessives and fetishists, no zombies mindlessly parroting “movement” dogma, but hardcore, “vanguardist” political soldiers, truly vetted (extremely!) and put through years of long apprenticeship, a genuine movement akin to that of Codreanu, a pan-European Brotherhood that will form the core of the undermining of the old System and the creation of a new one.  And guess what?  This is not talked about in “interviews” with the media, it is not recruited online in sniggering “forums,” it is instead done privately and prudently, slowly, carefully, and with forethought.  Obviously, the existence of such an organization would not be a secret, just as the existence of the CIA, MI6, KGB, and GRU were not secrets, but the inner workings of the group, by analogy to those others, would of course be hidden from the public.  

2. Community activism.  Real community activism is done, not talked about.  It is done as much as possible “under the radar.”  You do not broadcast it to mocking media operatives, you don’t go through the motions for the sake of a quick blog post, this is not something done overnight.  True community activism is for the long-term, it is a work of years, it is done to help the community, not with an attitude of expecting an immediate compensation – the idea of compensation should not come into it at all. Of course, community activism by its nature cannot be kept secret; the point is that such activism is its own publicity – in other words, it becomes known because it occurs and it is effective, it is its own advertisement, it doesn’t become known because activists spend more time talking to the media than they do actually helping people.

3. Metapolitics and infrastructure. Metapolitics has been discussed endlessly by the Far Right, and so there is no need to repeat all of that here. Such activity is essential, as long as it is fresh, creative, and open-minded, and not merely the regurgitation of fossilized “movement” dogma.  We need real infrastructure to carry out our objectives, approaches to defeat social pricing, funding that goes beyond tin cup panhandling but actual involves earning money through some sort of productivity, service, and/or representation, we need lawyers (and not to drive them out of the “movement”), we need businessmen, doctors, academics, plumbers, mechanics, schoolteachers, politicians, we need a recreated and actualized society. By the way, metapolitics should include Salter’s democratic multiculturalism, which overlaps with both community activism and electoral politics.

4. Electoral politics. This has three purposes.  First, education, propaganda, and recruitment.  Second, provocation, heightening the contradictions, undermining the System, promoting chaos and balkanization.  Third, if elected, these people can not only leverage their office for the preceding two purposes, but also to protect the movement as much as possible,

5. Rallies, etc. – false-flag and genuine. False-flag rallies are meant as a distraction, to focus attention of adversaries to the open and superficial “cosplay actors on the street” as opposed to the more serious work going on elsewhere.  It would still need to be credible, to be viewed as a genuine threat and so worthy of attention, and also so as not to repulse Whites interested in joining the cause.  Later on, with the success of the other objectives 1-4 above, rallies and mass meetings, of a highly professional nature (even more so that the false-flag ones), can occur for all the positives such events can genuinely provide to a real and growing firmly established movement.

The Present Puny and Worthless Race

Der Movement Stupidity.

I’m writing an important piece on “The Strategic Objective” (which will, of course, be completely ignored by Der Movement once posted here); in the meantime, some brief news.

Read this.

Ordinarily, I don’t link to Counter-Currents, but if Greg Johnson wants to do some of my work for me by discrediting the Beavis-and-Butthead Brigade, then link I will.  The problem with that is that Johnson doesn’t go far enough in his criticism, particularly self-criticism over the Hermansson and Lewis infiltrations and his own hysterical, thin-skinned “banning” of anyone who has the temerity to hold him accountable for that (or for anything else). And his own feuding with Spencer (“no truce!”) has been one of the problems. 

Will Bolton’s book ever be mentioned at Counter-Currents?  I hope so; I hope anti-Arktos attitudes won’t get in the way of that.

But, hey, thanks Greg, for letting me know about Red Ice.  The disintegration of the Alt Right proceeds apace.

Johnson won’t tell you though that (despite negative attitudes toward Spencer since 2014 [at least]), Greg was all on-board with the “Alt Right brand” (big tent! big tent!) up until Hailgate and Feudgate, while I (and Strom) was opposed to Alt Right stupidity from the very beginning (and said so not only here but at Counter-Currents comments threads as well). All down the memory hole!


Is somebody monitoring these reporters when they are “embedded,” or are they just allowed to skulk around unsupervised? Has it crossed anyone’s mind that these snoops might be passing along intelligence to the ADL, SPLC, antifa, and law enforcement?

All true, but coming from someone who let Hermansson and Lewis “skulk around unsupervised” at “extreme vetted meetings” this is just a bit too much – chutzpah that goes beyond what one would find at a yarmulke factory.

A commentator writes to Johnson:

At this point, either Anglin is the leader of White Nationalism in America, or you and Anglin are

Cue snare drums and audience laughter.


…we need to penalize attention whores who are building their brands at the expense of the greater movement.

Yes, indeed, I agree completely.  Does Greg have a mirror handy?

White Nationalism 3.0 will be hammered out by Counter-Currents and advocates of American Nationalism like James Allsup, Identity Europa, Anglin & Weev, and Mike Enoch.

Gee, WN 2.0 didn’t last that long, did it?  We’re now getting ready for 3.0.  And look who Johnson thinks will be riding to our rescue. The complete lack of self-awareness is mind-boggling.  These guys couldn’t hammer their way out of a paper bag, much less hammer out an authentic movement. Where is Charles Martel (or Thor) when we need him?  Hammer away!

A commentator:

Tall, thin, attractive, Nordic, well dressed, are all words that come to mind when I think of these guys. This is where the American movement should be.

Sure, that’s the criteria necessary to decide who is appropriate.  After all, it has worked out so well before.  Bring back Patrik Hermansson!  I’m sure he’d like to help with future “extreme vetting.”  But, wait, you guys already have tall, thin, attractive Nordics like Mike Enoch, so you’re all set! 

It’s WN 3.0!  Or WN 30.0!  Or WN Googolplex.0!

These guys think all the iterations of WN are getting better.  They are wrong.  One is reminded of the age-old wisdom:

But Time, which wears out every thing, introduced a more degenerate Race; so that every succeeding Generation is grown more corrupt than the preceding, till we are dwindled down to the present puny and worthless Race.

Indeed.  WN 2.0, 3.0, ad infinitum. Whites as a whole, in fact.  By the way, the growing success of The Black Panther movie is in large part due to the White audience. “The present puny and worthless Race.”


Will these people ever go away?
Not as long as the movement lets a hostile press declare who our leaders are.


Will these people (including the WN 3.0 crowd) ever go away?
Not as long as the “movement” is dominated by Type I activists who practice ethnic affirmative action.

Now, for all about the Afrowops:

Leonard here basically moves into Farrell territory.

Looking at the trends you’d almost think the historically and genetically more germanic north had different instincts than the heavily mixed south.

Yes, because Salvini, just by looking at him, could easily be mistaken for Dolph Lundgren’s younger brother.

By the way, the Italian people would not be “ungovernable” if the worst 10-20% of the population (both north and south) was culled, leaving the more healthy elements behind.  The Campanian 5 Star hero Di Maio looks like a Pakistani for example (a handcuffed Greg Conte weeps softly).  And let’s not forget the northerners – the young Mussolini looked like the younger brother of General Mapache from The Wild Bunch. If that’s reflective of the underlying genetics then no wonder it’s “ungovernable.”  Why should the healthy 80-90% suffer because of a botched minority?

Roissy claims that some of his best friends are “pasta naggers.”  Fair enough.  After all, some of my best friends are cuck naggers, so it all balances out well in the end.

Another important step forward for The God Emperor!  Pepe (and Roissy) weeps.

The Dying Alt Right and Other News

News. Satire. It’s all one.

Is the Alt Right dying?

It is more and more looking like Sallis is going to be right once again, as I’ve repeatedly predicted that the fever dream (nightmare) of the Alt Right is going to end, sooner or later, but the speed of the collapse is even taking me by surprise.  The loss of Bristow is devastating, absolutely devastating.

And of course the anti-White scum crow in delight:

“Everyone in the alt-right is a malignant contrarian,” Lenz said about the growing divisions in their movement following the united front the alt-right displayed in Charlottesville. “They come from a culture where insults are the coin of the realm.”

But, but, but…I thought it was only “White Nationalism 1.0” that could be so categorized?  Oh wait, I was right about this as well, although that’s nothing, the equivalent of “being right” about stating that “the sun will rise tomorrow morning.”

The association of “the movement” with the Alt Right means that racial nationalism in America will be damaged (once again!) by this latest fiasco, proving right those who warned that a too-close association with racial nationalism with one relatively juvenile and inept faction will be the downfall of any progress made as a result of Trumpian chaos and balkanization.

Leave it to our fearless leaders to go from the (admittedly overwrought) euphoria of November 2016 to the grim ashes of March 2018.

I guess that whole Legion Europa thing looks at least a little bit better in hindsight, no?  But of course that project wouldn’t do, would it.  It just didn’t have “all the trimmings,” so to speak, right?

Enjoy the collapse. It’s a long way down.  

And you have no one to blame but yourselves.  A “movement” based on Type I leaders and Type I followers, in today’s age of 24/7 media coverage, social media, heightened analysis, sophisticated police state tactics, well-funded “watchdog groups,” organized Far-Left domestic terrorists enabled by TrumpCuck and HowdySessions, is destined to fail.  What’s needed is less Type I empty bravado and more Type II cunning and planning.

Read this.

My understanding of the situation is that this woman used her own photograph on her pseudonymous activist social media account, used a pseudonym that was slightly different from her real name (Tiana Dalichov vs. Dayanna Volitich), and discussed detailed aspects of her IRL job while essentially indirectly taunting her employers (Agreed with a guest that white supremacists need to infiltrate schools and become teachers and said, “I’m absolutely one of them.” Said on her podcast that she had put on a “dog and pony” show for administrators, telling her students that when administrators showed up, “I’m going to be different than I usually am. I just don’t want you to be shocked, I want you to play along.”).

So, yes, I agree, that must have been satire.  I mean, a serious activist with a podcast and a social media account wouldn’t have done all of that, would they?  Well, Der Movement as a whole is satire, so how could anyone tell the difference?

I’ve written about this before, but I would be a strong supporter of Pierce’s “table-leg therapy” theory if I was not such a committed pacifistic humanist. Emphasis added:

Table-leg Therapy
Senator Fulbright and the Reverend Berrigan are still on the wrong side of every issue except Palestine, and they are on the right side of that issue for the wrong reasons.
In other words, liberals — including the consistent ones — are just as sick as ever and just as dangerous to the future of America as ever. The only way the great majority of them will get their thinking straight, eventually, is with a sturdy, oak table leg applied smartly and repeatedly alongside the head.
Nevertheless, the present dissension in liberal ranks is of inestimable value. It is the most fervent and influential of the liberals who are now taking an anti-Zionist position, and their numbers and influence are growing daily.

Can we skip the optional Asian (girl) friend?

But, but, but…the great and good Desmond Jones says that Italy is absolutely ethnically homogenous and will remain so until the end of time, forever and ever, amen.

Solution: these Nigerians are actually Sicilians.  It’s the mafia after all, and, as we know, real Nigerians are actually lighter-complexioned, more gracile, and racially more European than are the Sicilian Afrowops.