Category: movement’s ethnic affirmative action program

Sallis, Strom, and Racial Purity

Depends who writes it, I guess.

Remember this essay?  Remember the criticism the basic points received from the Nutzi peanut gallery?

Read this from Strom, emphasis added:

We have common ancestry with every living creature on this planet, if you go back far enough. So the old racialist idea of “purity” — meaning an unbroken, nearly identical lineage going “back to Adam” — was wrong from the start. Purity is the wrong word; those who used it were unaware of the ever-evolving nature of life. They were ignorant of evolution, which is a branching process; they didn’t know that all the races, varieties, subspecies, and species that ever lived are branches on one metaphorical tree — and that, going backwards in time, all the branches eventually converge into one at the root.

Question: Is the crazed mestizo “Chechar” going to accuse Strom of “sophistry?”  Does Strom – long associated with radical Nordicists like Pierce – have a “Medicist” agenda?  Or is he just talking hard science and plain common sense?

So: If Sallis writes it, then it’s bad.  If Strom writes it, it’s acceptable.  The exact same point, expressed by two different people, received in completely different ways.  Does that tell you anything?  

Then, this:

As the writer David Sims tells us, “Morally speaking, a flaw is anything that works contrary to survival. In any proper moral system, survival has the highest value. Why? Because nothing matters to the dead. Because neither truth, nor justice, nor freedom, nor prosperity have any value at all to extinct groups. Because only to something alive may anything else be good. If a moral system gives to anything but survival the highest place of value, sooner or later a conflict will arise between survival and whatever that other thing is.

Agreed, and that’s a point I was making long ago at Majority Rights, arguing against both the cognitive elitism of GNXP, and the aracial conservatism of John Ray.  We care about various ideas, in the last analysis, based upon how they affect us as people, as evolved organisms, and an idea does not benefit a group if that idea contributes to that group’s demise, or even if it doesn’t positively contribute to that group’s survival.

Regurgitating obviously wrong ideas about an absolute racial purity, which is easily discredited by the Left, does not serve the cause of survival.  A forward-looking emphasis on EGI and evolution (concepts that are not incompatible, by the way, regardless of “movement” lies that EGI favors “genetic stasis”) does enhance group survival – such arguments are proofed against an honest scientific critique.

Advertisements

Anti-Race, Greg Johnson, Sallis’ Law, and Other News

In der news.

See this to refute leftist lies..  If only Der Movement didn’t have a cordone sanitaire around EGI Notes, it could answer these leftist lies more effectively.

Genetic variation and genetic distance are not the same thing. Anyone claiming that Nigerians are more similar to Scots than they are to other Africans is scientifically illiterate. Any grouping of people will demonstrate more variation within than between – even mixed groups of Whites and Blacks together. That’s meaningless from the perspective of genetic kinship.  Also see Edwards’ “Lewontin’s Fallacy” paper.  Using science and logic is going to be more effective than the equivalent of stammering “but, but, but, it can’t be true, it makes no sense.”  By the way, the fact that population geneticists, who must know better, stay silent when leftist lies are uttered completely supports my contention that those academics are highly politicized on the Left.

We need to examine this quite remarkable comment by Greg Johnson:

Greg Johnson

Posted August 11, 2019 at 11:01 am | Permalink

Trump is toast in 2020 no matter what.

He let demographic replacement and voter fraud go unchecked.

He is now turning against the first and second Amendment rights of his base.

He will lose in a landslide.

By the time the next president comes in, there will be millions of new invaders inside our borders.

Then the race war will kick off in the summer of 2021.

White Nationalists need to ask ourselves if we are going to be among the people who fought against white dispossession who who declared ourselves accelerationists to own Trump and the GOP.

Which course makes it more likely we will be able to lead a genuine revolutionary National Populist movement?

Let’s dissect that:

Trump is toast in 2020 no matter what.

Given that I was wrong in 2016, I’m not making predictions about the 2020 election, at least not so early in the process.  Johnson may of course end up being correct in his prediction; if I was forced to bet money on the election outcome today, I would go with a Trump loss.  But the idea that you can say in August 2019 that “Trump is toast in 2020 no matter what” seems to me to be incredibly foolish.  “No matter what.”  Really? If Trump ends up winning (doubtful of course) then this comment by Johnson will go down the memory hole, and Counter-Currents would pretend it never happened.

He let demographic replacement and voter fraud go unchecked.

I thought he is sincere and a man of genuine greatness?  Gee, what kind of “blackmail” material does Johnson suspect the System has on the MAGA Man?

He is now turning against the first and second Amendment rights of his base.

Isn’t it more likely the man is, and always was, an unprincipled fraud?

He will lose in a landslide.

Maybe he will.  But it is indicative of a certain mindset of “movement leaders” that this is stated so boldly, so absolutely, so confidently, as if there isn’t the slightest possibility of an alternative outcome. Is this the type of prudent leadership a dissident movement requires?

By the time the next president comes in, there will be millions of new invaders inside our borders.

Perhaps.

Then the race war will kick off in the summer of 2021.

This is one of the most outrageous and unhinged comments ever made by Johnson.  Of course, in theory, anything is possible.  But is it likely? Do you really believe there is going to be open race war in America within two years?  Think about it. Would you be so confident as to state it as a foregone conclusion, rather than as a (somewhat unlikely) possibility? Even worse, given everything going on today, given the attempts to link White nationalism with “terrorism” and violence, and given the efforts of WNs to argue against that connection, it is the height of absolute foolishness for a “movement leader” to start talking about “the race war” that will “kick off in the summer of 2021.”  If some Nutzi shoots something up in the summer of 2021, don’t you think that quotes like this will be remembered by the System? Can we have leaders who are a bit more prudent and reserved in their proclamations?  

White Nationalists need to ask ourselves if we are going to be among the people who fought against white dispossession who who declared ourselves accelerationists to own Trump and the GOP.

As if the general public is going to know anything other than what the mass media tell them.

Which course makes it more likely we will be able to lead a genuine revolutionary National Populist movement?

These guys can’t even hold a private meeting without it being infiltrated or hold a rally without it disintegrating into chaos and they get chased of college campuses and are physically assaulted in the streets with impunity, they are wrong about almost everything they say, and they have zero prudence in their statements and behavior, but they are going to be leading “a genuine revolutionary National Populist movement?”

Delusion.

My biggest issue with “movement leaders” is their poor judgment, combined with a lack of accountability for the consequences of that poor judgment. I have no confidence in these people. They say or write things without any consideration of the implications, they plan rallies and events without consideration of possibilities and contingencies, they organize private meetings that are easily infiltrated and/or become beset by drug use or sexual harassment, they misjudge public figures (e.g., Trump) and current events, they make bold proclamations and overly confident predictions without consideration of alternative possibilities – there is a lack of prudence, a lack of depth, a lack of strategic planning, a lack of foresight.

Sallis’ Law needs to be extended – it’s not only about “admixture” but about ridicule, overall fetishism, etc.  Supporting Sallis’ Law, and supporting my contention that Der Movement has nothing to offer White ethnics, I offer a few samples from comments threads.

From an Amren article about Salvini and Gere:

What are the three shortest books in history? The book of German humor, the book of Italian war heroes, and the book of the wit and wisdom of the Polish people! Hey, hear the one about the German general and the Italian general? The German general before a battle says to his aid: Bring me my red jacket. The Italian general asks him (You have to do this in a phony Italian accent, btw), “whya doa you a needa red jacket?” The German general replies “because if I am shot, my men will not see the blood and will not lose hope.” Upon hearing this, the Italian general turns to his aid, “Aid, bringa me mya brown pants!” LOL.

Do you know why Italy is shaped like a boot?

Why?

U couldnt get all that sh*t into a sneaker.

You’d think ethnic jokes about Gere would be more appropriate there, but I guess not.

From a Counter-Currents article on The Sopranos:

….the overweening defensiveness about the Sopranos being “Italian” is unnecessary. It’s about a Mafia family, so they’re going to be Sicilian or Calabrese, most likely; goes without saying. One would not discuss a series about a Welsh coalmining family and go off on a pleading tangent about how it’s okay if they’re “British.” God is in the details.

Yes, God is in the details.  How about the details of Gere’s SJW fanaticism or Johnson’s chronic poor judgment?

Trump’s DOJ on the march again.  A man of genuine greatness!

8/12/19 News

News.

Does anyone see a common thread in these stories?  The Ames story alone would fit in well with The Good Shepherd, but not in the manner in which Der Movement obsesses over that movie – or, shall we say, one particular scene in that movie.

Der Movement, Der Movement, Der Movement marches on.

And the other shoe drops.

So much winning!

The current state of the “movement” – what an unmitigated disaster.  On the morning of Nov. 9, 2016, there were virtually unlimited opportunities for the “movement.”  There was enormous potential and it was all squandered, everything has been ruined – ruined by the Type I retards who make up the bulk of the rank-and-file and ruined even more by their affirmative action leadership, pathetic losers and professional failures whose only qualification for “movement leadership” is their ethnic background. 

And with all the serious issues as stake, “movement” “activists” are busy concentrating on what they perceive as crucially important matters – such as attempting to distort archaeogenetics findings even before they are published.

Reading online genetics forums, it seems like all my predictions about Der Movement’s reactions to the forthcoming Rome paper are coming true even before it is published.  The fetishists are foaming at the mouth, retconning their dogma with a vengeance.

Interestingly, many of these fetishists are Poles, who apparently believe that they’ll be accepted by NW Euros if they parrot then dogma even more vehemently than NW Euros do.  Fat chance of that.

Thus, the fetishists are pretending that the dogma was never that the Ancient Greeks and Romans (and Egyptians!) were Nordic. Oh no, perish the thought, that’s all down the memory hole.

Now, it’s that the Northern Italian-like real Romans were replaced (genocide!) by greasy Sicilian-like MENA immigrants.  And, of course, they say that assaying Ancient Rome is no different from assaying New York City – unless of course the findings were compatible with the original dogma and then they’d be crowing about the results and how “representative” they were.

The lesson here is that no matter what the findings of archaeogenetics, the fetishists will NEVER admit to being wrong. If a study demonstrated that King Leonidas was akin to a Nigerian, the fetishists would proclaim “Arthur Kemp was right!” – after all, in this scenario, Leonidas would be genetically distinct from modern Greeks, and wasn’t that all Kemp was saying?  Get with the program!  The fundamental dishonesty of these types is laughable.

Good to see that the Type Is have a good division of labor thing going on here.  Some of them keep busy retconning their disproved dogmas in truly Orwellian fashion, while others shoot up Walmarts and plan bombings, or look at child porn, which a certain VDARE contributor thinks should not be illegal.  

All of this is the direct outcome of Der Movement’s strict affirmative action policy.  Keep on enabling it, all you imbeciles out there.  And keep sending in those “D’Nations” to your “leaders” – after all, how else are they going to go on their trips to Europe while you sit in your parents’ basement, onanistically reveling over Durocher’s latest Unz posts?

Questions for Greg Johnson

About Trump.

Readers of this blog am aware that I refute Johnson’s take on Trump; for example, see here.

Johnson likes to portray the Trump question as one in which everyone was on “The Trump Train” in 2016 and everyone thought that Trump was sincere back then, and only now are people debating whether or not Trump was sincere, and only now are there disagreements on how to interpret Trump – it’s all after the fact.

But, as readers of this blog well know, I was openly calling Trump a fraud, a vulgar ignorant buffoon, and a Negrophilic race cuck BEFORE the election.  This was my endorsement of Trump the day before the election:

Yes, Trump is a vulgar ignorant buffoon, a Negro-loving beta race cuck civic nationalist with a Jewified family, an overweight imbecile, a lazy and ill-prepared debater, an embarrassment of a political candidate, a blustering clown, and a crass jackass. Nevertheless, as SJW America perceives Trump as being a “racist fascist bigot,” a Trump electoral victory will do a fine job of destabilizing the multicultural consensus, balkanizing society, enraging the Coloreds and the Left, creating chaos, and weakening the System.

I was correct all across the board – about Trump himself and the hysterical leftist reaction to Trump.  And I was critical of Trump in a similar fashion even before that Nov. 7, 2016 post – calling him “Touchback Trump” for his open embrace of “touchback immigration” and other support for legal mass immigration and back-door amnesty for illegals.

Here are a few comments about Trump featured on EGI Notes in the weeks leading up to the election:

How desperate WN activists must have been to consider Donald Trump (of all people!) as some sort of savior. 

A key point here is that Trump is more or less an intellectual empty vessel, so one must take care as to what is poured into him.  

Thus, the current electoral campaign needs to be considered, not because the vulgar buffoon Trump, a negro-loving race cuck, is of importance in and of himself, but because of the possibilities inherent in leveraging the Trump phenomenon for White racial advantage in the dark days to come.

Trump: the leftist, Negro-loving, waffling, indecisive, amnesty-shilling, beta ultra-cuck.  

And within a week of the election, I was accusing Trump of “cucking.”  That was at a time when all the Quota Queens were hysterically hailing Trump and talking about how the “God Emperor” was going to fix American demographics.

I note that Kevin Strom also expressed reservations about Trump before the election.

Questions for Johnson:

What were Strom and I seeing in 2016 about Trump that you people were missing?  Why was I openly labelling Trump a buffoon, a fraud, a race cuck, etc. back in 2016, while you are still claiming – in 2019! – that Trump was sincere and a man of genuine greatness? There must have been SOMETHING that people like me determined about Trump in the past that you still do not recognize today – or pretend not to recognize to protect your reputation. What was it?

Those questions get to the heart of the matter.  It’s not as if everyone was in the same boat back in 2016 but now differ looking back in hindsight.  There were fundamental differences of opinion about Trump precisely at the time when people like Johnson were most enthusiastic about Trump.

So again: What was I (and people like Strom) noticing about Trump that the likes of Johnson were missing?

Occam’s Butterknife: Sallis and Strom were wrong about Trump in 2016 and, by an amazing coincidence, events just happened to work out so that everything they were saying about Trump has become legitimized by how Trump has behaved since being elected. Trump is a man of greatness – genuine greatness! – brought down by some inner flaw, a tragic figure, perhaps being blackmailed by dastardly puppet-masters who forced him into a showdown with Sweden over A$AP Rocky.

Occam’s Razor: Trump in 2016 was transparently showing all the signs of being a crass vulgar ignorant buffoon, a man with deep Jewish connections even in his closest family, a man with a long record of having close personal ties with Negro celebrities, a man with socially liberal views (except for an attachment to “law and order” and a personal animus toward Obama), a man with no real deep inner convictions other than his own ego, a man obviously latching on to right-wing populism to distinguish himself from other GOP candidates who were far more intelligent and qualified and favored to win, a man completely undisciplined and intellectually lazy, a man who values family and friends over ideology and hardcore politics, a blustering blowhard without the inner fire to follow through on hard decisions, a small and mediocre man with enough cunning and showmanship to find a winning formula to victory. And, also, people paying careful attention noticed his civic nationalism even at the peak of his populist rhetoric, and his additions of a “big beautiful door” in “the wall” and his constant refrain of “touchback immigration.”  Perhaps people remembered all of the previous Man on White Horse failures. And, perhaps, just perhaps, those people who lambasted Trump in 2016 were merely demonstrating keen insight and good judgment, qualities sorely lacking in the superficial Pepe crowd who jumped on “The Trump Train” with nary a skeptical thought.

Johnson can try and gaslight you folks all he wants, but the questions asked above remain.  Why were some skeptical of Trump at the height of the Alt Right hysteria over the man?  What were those people noticing?  How did they know that Trump was an insincere fraud?  Why did they pick up on the danger signs of immediate cucking right after the election?  If Trump was sincere why did he strike some people as transparently insincere?  If Trump is a man of genuine greatness why did he immediately strike some people as a moronic buffoon, and why has he acted like a buffoon since being elected?

Most of all, why can’t any of the Quota Queens have the character to admit that they were wrong?

Gere and Silver

Flip sides of the same problem.

Read this.

Gere’s ancestry, from Wikipedia:

His paternal great-grandfather had changed the spelling of the surname from “Geer”.[1] Both of his parents were Mayflower descendants; Gere’s ancestors include Pilgrims Francis Eaton, John Billington, George Soule, Richard Warren, Degory Priest, Francis Cooke, and William Brewster.[1]

I’m shocked, shocked, I say.  He certainly passes any “extreme vetting” for an Alt Right meeting.  Indeed, he has all the requisite qualifications to be an Alt Right leader.

And now we have our friend Silver:

silviosilver ✓ᵀʳᵘᵐᵖ ˢᵘᵖᵖᵒʳᵗᵉʳ 

To call yourself a “Trump supporter” in 2016 was understandable, albeit naïve.  But to do so in 2019?

I would have liked to hear how the group defines “white.” I suspect they’re not playing by the “latino house rules,” in which 80% of Puerto Ricans get to call themselves white.

If they really believe that, say, 70% of Argentinians are White – in the sense of being the same as the Spanish, Italian, and German immigrant stocks – then they are indeed playing by those house rules.

Nonetheless, even a stricter definition will still be largely arbitrary. 

All they really have to do is reject New World admixture.

It will probably be impossibly difficult for the typical “white” Chilean to turn away someone only slightly less “white” simply because of some new urgency of qualifying oneself as white. 

Perhaps for the general population; I am not familiar with Chilean society.

After all, these are people who get along with each other and who share a common identity; breaking apart those bonds on the basis of an arbitrary racial distinction will surely strike them as absurd and immoral.

The same can be said for America as well.

In attenuated form, the same problem plagues the American scene.

Well, yes, but the solution is to sort out the problems, not revel in them.

Pro-white thinkers have not paid nearly enough attention to this issue. 

Now Silver is gaslighting.  Most “pro-White thinkers” “think” about nothing else.

In the past, there was little need to.

Which is why the entire “movement” is based upon it.

Infamously contemptuous WASP attitudes towards other racial kinds…

That Silver previously “infamously” supported.

…helped to etch comparatively solid racial and cultural lines. 

Didn’t stop them from opening the borders to other types.  Gotta have that cheap labor, I suppose.

And WASP demographic predominance meant that marginal cases could safely be filed away in the too hard basket. 

What is that supposed to mean?  Who knows?

That’s no longer the case. Whites have crossbred among themselves and with others – and continue to, at an accelerating rate – and most whites (and “quasi-whites”) subscribe to a common white culture. WASP contemptuousness has vanished. 

Vanished?  It is alive and well in Der Movement – it is indeed the bedrock of Der Movement.  It hasn’t completely vanished in the general society either – it manifests today as The Speaker Syndrome. The same types who grovel to the Negro may well harbor disdain for the White ethnic. And we have Richard Gere lovingly helping African migrants invade Southern Europe.

The result is blurred racial and cultural distinctions all the way down. 

Solutions to this are rejected out-of-hand by the inherent dogma of Der Movement.

Whites in North America are undoubtedly better positioned to save themselves than whites in Latin America, but the aforementioned issues make what was already a hard task even harder.

And Silver will do what he can to make that hard task even harder.

Gaslighting Greg at It Again

Pathetic.

Hunter Wallace has declared war on President Trump. He’s not the only one, of course, but he’s by far the most articulate.

That “most articulate” (by far!) declaration of war by Wallace is simply his reposting of someone else’s tweets. Laughable. This demonstrates why Johnson has to rank among the most fundamentally dishonest people in the Far Right today. He only addresses the low hanging fruit, and ignores real and legitimate criticism.

Johnson’s dishonesty is on display by comparing the following two paragraphs.

Trump’s America First, National Populist stances on immigration, globalization, and foreign policy resonated with millions of Americans: Republicans, independents, and even Democrats. Enough to win him the nomination and the Presidency.

But, as I never tire of pointing out, Trump did not have to take these positions to win. The whole system is premised on not giving the people what they want. Trump could have played by the system’s rules. Trump could have xeroxed the Jeb! platform and still won, based simply on his celebrity, money, and personality. In fact, it would have been easier for Trump to win that way, because by running a National Populist campaign, he had to fight a two-front war against Hillary Clinton and the Republican Party/Conservative Inc. establishment.

So, on the one hand, Trump’s campaign resonated because of his right-wing populism; on the other hand, he could have won simply by being Jeb II with a bigger personality. Johnson has to pull this sleight-of-hand nonsense because he needs to defend his own naive and simpleton-like belief – put in writing years ago and criticized here – that Trump was “sincere.” You see, the “proof” that Trump was “sincere” is that he ran a right-wing populist campaign even though he could have won by being a vulgar and ignorant version of Jeb Bush. Even though that “Trump’s America First, National Populist stances on immigration, globalization, and foreign policy resonated…Enough to win him the nomination and the Presidency.” The reality of course is that Trump’s personality and personal history was actually an impediment for certain important sections of the Republican electorate, who overlooked these flaws because of the promise of Trump’s right-wing populism.

Johnson keeps on peddling the same stupidity that I’ve refuted here time and again. Particularly the idea that Trump could have won on a Jeb Bush platform is so outrageous, it must win an all-time award for Imperial Gaslighting.

See this, emphasis added:

Johnson doesn’t believe Trump was a fraud from the beginning; after all, that would prove Sallis right and Johnson wrong, and we can’t have that. Johnson promotes the lie that Trump could have “cloned Jeb Bush’s platform” and still have won because of his “personality”- can you believe this? In reality, Trump’s campaign took off only after he started talking about Mexican rapists and started attacking the Bush family and their policies.  

What’s laughable is that right after Johnson makes his gaslighting comment, they all admit that people voted for Trump precisely because of his strong talk about immigration (these guys can’t get their stories straight from minute to minute.) – yes, that’s the point.  It was NOT Trump’s personality, which was actually a turn-off for many people who voted for him.  Does anyone believe that Republican voters, including evangelicals, would support a twice-divorced and thrice-married vulgar New York real estate tycoon and reality TV star who talks about his “big hands” and “grabbing pussies” IF this buffoon was merely a neoconservative clone of Jeb Bush?  Does any sane person believe that the enthusiasm that carried Trump to the nomination and then to the Presidency was based on his obnoxious jackass personality, independent of a hardline position on immigration and his America First domestic and foreign policy positions that were articulated during the campaign?…

…It is entirely possible that Trump has some very vague civic nationalist and populist beliefs. But they are likely not important to him, not crucial to his worldview; he is not serious or sincere about any of it in any hardcore, authentic fashion.  He does in fact embody, as Ted Cruz suggested, New York values. He has Jewish family connections, a deep attachment to Israel, and a fondness for Negroes. He is a self-centered narcissist and if he truly cares about anyone other than himself then it likely is his elder daughter Ivanka and no one else. He certainly doesn’t care about his base.  If Trump was (and is) sincere, then why does he ignore his base (e.g., Antifa attacks, State of the Union address), lie to his base (e.g., “the Wall is being built!”) and constantly betray his base (e.g., hiring Neocons, shilling for increased legal immigration, an aggressive foreign policy, pro-Negro “criminal justice reform”)?  The man cares more about pardoning Jack Johnson than he does about his own supporters being physically attacked in the streets and sent to the hospital. His own DOJ persecutes his followers when they defend themselves and ignores the leftist domestic terrorists running wild in the streets.  For Trump to be sincere and commit all his crimes of omission and commission against his base means that the man must be a psychotic retard. However, while he may be vulgar and ignorant, and may be a psychopath, he is not psychotic and he is not retarded…

…if he were sincere, he’s had 2.5 years to give some demonstration of it, and he has done the exact opposite.  He’s not sincere.  He’s a fraud and Johnson was wrong and Sallis was right.

Now back to Johnson’s screed:

When a man pays a huge price to campaign on issues that he didn’t need to win, that tells me that he is sincere. That’s why I believed Trump could save America. That’s why I did everything in my power to get him elected.

This is all about Johnson defending himself, not Trump. This is all about Johnson defending himself, so all you guys don’t realize how naive and inept he really is, so you keep sending in your “D’Nations” and allow him to live a better life than you do yourselves. How many trips to Europe have you taken recently?  

So what happened to the Trump presidency? Obviously, he encountered forces stronger than his convictions about what is necessary to save America. Many of these forces are external. Blackmail cannot be ruled out. Historians will be puzzling out the enigma of Trump well into the next century.

Or they could have been reading EGI Notes back in 2016.  I told you Trump was a fraud and a moron and I was correct.  Johnson – an affirmative action “leader” – was dead wrong, and can’t admit it without the entire facade he’s erected around himself collapsing.

Donald Trump is a tragic figure in the true sense of the word. We are witnessing the terrifying spectacle of a man of genuine greatness failing because of his own grievous faults.

A man of genuine greatness!  Who talked about his “big hands” at debates, and whose knowledge about America’s nuclear triad revolved around “devastation is really important.” This is a man whose policy decisions are influenced by Kim Kardashian and Kanye West. This is a man who sits back and does nothing while his own supporters are physically attacked with impunity; indeed, his own DOJ persecutes his own supporters. He behaves like a borderline retard, but he must be “a man of genuine greatness,” or else Johnson is exposed as a fool, and we can’t have that!

Now I have a serious question to pose to White Nationalists: 

Why support Greg Johnson?

If you want our movement to be in a position to mobilize the Trump electorate and turn it into a genuinely revolutionary National Populist movement, what should our stance be today and going into the 2020 election?

Der Movement needs to be destroyed.

Should we openly declare war on “Blompf”? Should we pour scorn on the “boomers” and “normies” who still support him? Should we announce our intention to tip the 2020 election to the Democrats?

Who is doing the latter?  Oh, that’s right, Johnson’s fellow Quota Queens.  Tulsi Gabbard!  Andrew Yang!  Thus cry the affirmative action cases.  They’ll be endorsing AOC next.

Believe me, folks, I understand the temptation. The A$AP Rocky fiasco is surely one of the most surreal and undignified episodes in the history of the American Presidency. 

But, let us not forget – Trump is a man of genuine greatness!  I mean, really now, EGI Notes told you, years ago, that Trump was a Negrophilic race cuck.  But keep on supporting Johnson and his impeccable pedigree.

And the entire “A$AP Rocky fiasco” undermines Johnson’s argument, as suggested in my last paragraph.  Why would a man of “genuine greatness” do something so outrageously,  embarrassingly stupid?  Is the “tragic figure” Trump being blackmailed to support Black rappers?  Was he blackmailed to pardon Jack Johnson or to push for “criminal justice reform” to allow Black criminals back on the streets?  Isn’t it more likely that Trump is simply a moron, a juvenile jackass, a fan of Negro entertainers, a man of genuine smallness and mediocrity?

And I understand why the Left would like to exploit the El Paso massacre to grab power, but it boggles the mind that Trump and the Republicans are basically willing to throw power away, undermining the First and Second Amendments merely to appease raving lunatics who think anyone to the Right of Hillary Clinton should be censored, disarmed, and eventually replaced by brown helots.

Hmm…would a man truly sincere in his beliefs do this?

Bashing Trump has several benefits:

1. It helps put a stake in the heart of the Man on White Horse Syndrome.

2. It exposes the pathetic failures of the Quota Queens, who followed up their Trump humiliation with endorsements of Tulsi Gabbard and Andrew Yang.

3. It clearly distinguishes White nationalism from Trumpian fraud and moronic civic nationalism.

These guys had three years to reach out to Trump supporters, and instead gave us Unite the Right, the Pilleater Chronicles, and the usual “movement” stupidities and dogmas.  They are protecting their own income stream.  Send in those “D’Nations”- that’s what it is all about. Defending Trump is all about defending their own record of hysterical Trump support.  MAGA!  Pepe!  Kek!

If average group intelligence defines “supremacy,” this is a “yellow supremacist” publication.

Well, since Amren is always harping on IQ, then it is a yellow supremacist publication, as I have previously stated, and got criticized for by all the usual suspects.

The Counter-Currents and Amren failings together point out the real problem.  The real problem is Der Movement, not Trump.  It never really mattered, in the end, if Trump was sincere or not.  Running that campaign,and being elected, was sufficient to set the stage. The 2016 election handed the baton to the “leaders” of the “movement” – who promptly dropped the baton in the toilet and flushed it away. Instead of building in depth we instead got obsessions over a cartoon frog, tiki torch marches and “Jews will not replace us,” Hermansson and Lewis, Pilleater’s accusations of cocaine use and homosexual sexual harassment at “racialist meetings,” the deranged fetishism of Durocher and Ash Donaldson, declarations that Anglin will be one of the new voices of WN 3.0 (remember that, Greg?), endorsements of Gabbard and Yang, and all the rest.  Trump didn’t fail the “movement,”  The “movement” failed itself.  And it failed you, dear reader.

Where to Donate?

A thought experiment.

Imagine an extremely wealthy White individual who wanted to donate money to causes that promoted the interests of European-derived peoples.

Where could they donate so that the money would be effectively used?

Apart from helping out with Salter’s research, always a noble cause, I cannot think of a single activity, group, blog, political party, or “movement leader” worth investing in, either here in America or abroad.  Not one. The moderately wealthy Regnery has funded certain activities, but, I myself do not see any of those activities as worthy.

There is nothing, absolutely nothing, a terrible indictment of Der Movement and its failed leadership.

Are we then surprised that some individuals, in desperation, likely feeling abandoned by the Quota Queen Tin Cup Brigade and their shameless panhandling for “D’Nations,” destroy themselves with foolish activities?

So, this thought experiment confirms what this blog has been saying for a long time – Der Movement is a pathetic failure and a complete waste, and, hence, there is currently nothing in the “movement” really worth investing in. Supporting certain aspects of relevant academic research would be good, as mentioned above, but as regards direct political and metapolitical activism, there is nothing.