Category: New Movement

What are the Chances?

Be honest.

Put aside all your hopes, what you want to happen, what you wish to happen. Imagine you have a powerful incentive to make the most accurate prediction possible.  Imagine that you must be absolutely, ruthlessly honest.

So, the issue here is – predict what the chances are for White racial nationalist victory.  What are the probabilities?  Choose from:

Zero – no chance of victory whatsoever; defeat and racial destruction is assured

Negligible – there is a theoretical chance of victory, it is greater than zero, but it is so small, it is like winning the lottery or being hit by lightning

Low – say up to 15%

Low to Moderate – 15-40%

Moderate – 40-60%

Moderate to High – 60-80%

High – 80-100%

Absolutely certain – 100% chance of victory, absolutely assured

For me, I’d say that if we stay on the current trajectory, and have Der Movement dominating racial activism, it is Negligible.  I will not say zero, because there is always a chance.

If a New Movement following my ideas arises that can effectively compete with Der Movement, perhaps we can move into the Low range. If this New Movement completely replaces Der Movement, and if things break our way, perhaps Low to Moderate. But, at this point, that’s it.  Even the most ludicrously optimistic evaluation, with EVERYTHING breaking our way, cannot pass Moderate.

And of all of the above, the scenario that is overwhelmingly most likely is the Negligible choice, the one in which Der Movement leads us to the grave.

Be honest.  Do this exercise yourself.

If you disagree with my pessimism, then, on your own blogs (if you have such), explain why – without falling into the Quota Queen dishonesty designed to maximize “D’Nations.”


Codreanu’s New Man

Western Destiny essay.

The essay is a commentary on a short scholarly paper analyzing the role of The New Man in the worldview of the Legionary Movement. I comment on certain excerpts from the paper, particularly in light of the current situation of (American) racial nationalism.

Quo Vadis pan-Europeanism?

Whither pan-Europeanism?

Anyone else notice that Amren is really pushing the work of McCulloch recently?  Once again Sallis is proven correct, as I predicted that the HBD-Nordicist alliance, with Jewish/Asian interests in the background, will always attempt to divide Europeans against each other. Der Movement is tiresomely predictable, and the HBDers most of all.

Comment from the threads:

Miss Annie  

Southern and Eastern Europeans are admixed with Asian and Arab blood due to wars and invasions during the Middle Ages onward. For example, Spain and Portugal were conquered by Muslims in the eight century. It took eight centuries to get rid of the Muslims, but they still left their legacy in its inhabitants which, in turn, slowed the country’s economic growth as well scientific and literary progress.

Evidence of Siberian/East Asian admixture in Northern Europe – which even the radically hardcore Nordicist Durocher now admits exists (although he claims it is “beneficial” to all humanity) – is of course excluded from such screeds.  

Note to White ethnics – leave Der Movement ASAP.  

Now, let’s look at input on this matter from everyone’s favorite dishonest commentator Silver: 

For some people, the racial and cultural differences become too significant to paper over as one moves from northwest Europe to southeast Europe. Although pan-European ideals hold some degree of personal appeal for me, I think it’s terribly unrealistic to expect most people to ever share them. Pan-Slavism had more going for it than pan-Europeanism, but even that never really got off the ground.

Slav is technically not a racial term, but I am not opposed to its use in this way. There is less racial variation among the people encompassed by the linguistic term Slav than there is in the racial term ‘white’, after all.

I have the impression that people tend to run away from Slav as a racial identifier in a bid to avoid association with the sorts of things that WNs have historically regarded as backward or inferior in Slavic cultures. This is especially so if they are coming at WN from a national socialist angle.

Despite the numerous factors in its favor, pan-Slavism would, I agree, have served as little more than a vehicle for the promotion of Russian interests, simply given the sheer weight of numbers on the Russian side.

It’s easy enough to proclaim European unity, especially in internet comments, but achieving actual unity in real world activism is rather more difficult.

A racial movement is not like other movements, in which membership is determined by the views a person claims to hold. Membership is decided by visual identification. No amount of pleading will ever persuade some people to accept those they visually identify as too racially divergent, nor do constant reassurances do much to assuage the doubts of those whose inclusion is questioned.

The history of racial activism has amply demonstrated, I think, that any real world get-together will always be infected by such hardliners who will invariably express their views and question other people’s inclusion, leading to bickering and self-doubt – at which point any presumed ‘unity’ goes out the window.

The only way I can see for a racial movement to surmount this problem is market itself as a cultural movement – to promote a European cultural identity – and trust that, essentially, only whites will ever really be attracted to it. Misgivings about visual identifications would not then be the barrier to unity they are in a strictly racial movement. The very racial hardliners that make unity so difficult in a racial movement would also likely self-select out of a cultural movement, which would also ease the way to unity.

If you knew nothing about Silver’s past history, these comments would seem somewhat reasonable, even though we may disagree with the recommendations he makes. Unfortunately for him, some of us have long memories, and statements from him like “Although pan-European ideals hold some degree of personal appeal for me…” rank among the most dishonest in the history of the Internet.  Silver has been a bitter enemy of pan-Europeanism for the past dozen years, and has been mocking, attacking, and deconstructing pan-Europeanism, often in the most mendacious and or infantile fashion, ever since he started infesting the Majority Rights comments threads in the mid-2000s.

Regarding his contention that “Membership is decided by visual identification…” that may hold for the McCulloch faction, but many – most? – people in Der Movement go by ancestry.  For example, most people in Der Movement would reject a “Nordish” Jew, but accept a darker, swart cockney “Paleo-Atlantid” Englishman.

With respect to the main point that White unity in Der Movement will always be undermined by Nordicist hardliners who reject and exclude other Whites and by the reaction of those other Whites to that exclusion, I agree. My brief period of thinking that compromise was possible was wrong-headed delusion on my part; I can admit when I have been wrong, and I was wrong in that case.  If that makes some question my judgment, so be it.  Unlike Greg Johnson and the other Quota Queens, I’m not going to hide my errors in an attempt to safeguard others’ opinions of me.

Silver’s recommendations are flawed.  Cultural nationalism does not solve the race problem to everyone’s satisfaction; even if it are mostly Whites who are attracted to it, it still leaves the door open for mass “cultural conversion” and assimilation, attacking the foundations of racial preservationism. One solution, and that which I have advocated, is adding (not replacing) cultural factors to racial ones, instead of replacing race with culture, or vice versa – thus merging the Salterian and Yockeyian viewpoints (note I use Salterian not McCullochian – ancestry not phenotype).

Pan-Slavism has been, as Silver admits, a failure and a vehicle for Russian domination. Further, it can exhibit the same problems as pan-Europeanism. One can imagine neo-Nordicist North Slav types, such as the Polako and Raciology specimens, attacking “racially admixed” South Slavs and making a distinction between “True Slavs” (Poles, Russians) and “False Slavs” (Serbians, Bulgarians). Same problem, smaller scale.

Personally, I’m a pessimist, and believe that Der Movement has already ruined a viable chance at victory.  But, we can still try. What I advocate is that the small minority of activists who are pan-Europeanists (true ones, not Nordicists trying to expand their “D’Nations” base) cut loose from Der Movement and go their own way.

Pan-Europeanists should have their own groups, groupuscules, blogs, websites, organizations, meetings, etc.  They should build a New MovementThey should be hardliners themselves – absolutely eschewing, excluding, and rejecting all Nordicists, fetishists, HBDers and other dividers.  Now, there are possible problems here.  There are so few true pan-Europeanists that there may not be a critical mass for success.  From experience, I know that Nordicists and others of similar ilk will always try to weasel their way into pan-European groups, to subvert the mission and undermine activities. Conversely, there will be pan-Europeanists who will impatiently attempt to expand their influence by accepting these other types or at least by making “alliances” with them. These dangers will exist.  But if Type II pan-Europeanists can perform better than the Type I Nutzis dancing through cemeteries with their swastika-soled boots, then they can  provide an attractive, viable alternative to the failed “movement” and to the hardline dividers to whom Silver refers. A more successful and sane movement can attract high quality people, establishing a positive feedback loop of steady and sound growth, while leaving the failed “movement” to degenerate under the weight of its own failures and insanity.

Do I think this will occur?  No. I think the swastika-soled boots crowd will dance off into the sunset, tripping over a tombstone, hurdling headlong into the grave. The majority of rank-and-file activists – including many who call themselves pan-European – are slavishly addicted to Der Movement and will not break ranks with it until it is too late to do any good.

We’re very likely doomed.  You can’t say I haven’t warned you.  You can’t say that I haven’t been (constantly) offering you an alternative.  It’s been your choice to (constantly) reject that alternative.

I’d like to make one more important point.  If pan-Europeanism is so crazy and unrealistic, then why is that that you have Nordicists – Pierce and Duke being two prominent examples – who always seem to find it necessary to pretend to be pan-European?  I alluded to one possible reason above, the desire to maximize followers and followers’ donations. But I see three more fundamental reasons for this.  

First, although authentic pan-Europeanists are relatively few, they have an influence out of proportion to their numbers.  Consider Yockey – you have the hardcore ethnonationalists of Counter-Currents always promoting Yockey and his work, and the Nordicist National Alliance is now selling Yockey’s masterpiece Imperium. And all these types have not hesitated to make use of my own work in the past.  Second, although there is a significant and very loud hardline Nordicist faction as well as Nordicist-oriented rank-and-file activists, there is also a significant, more “silent,” fraction of activists who are at least vaguely sympathetic to pan-Europeanism, and who would be a mobilizable force with better (and more genuine) leadership.  Third, the White masses already think excluding even the Jews is nutty; thus, excluding Southern and Eastern Europeans would strike many of them as completely unhinged. Many of the things that are acceptable within Der Movement’s “amen corner” would not “fly” in the broader society. I understand the difference between descriptive and prescriptive, but if the prescriptive is derived from the counter-productive obsessions of a particular hardline faction, then perhaps the prescription needs to be re-thought.

Therefore, perhaps the problem is not with pan-Europeanism, but instead derived from the fact that the American “movement” had its genesis in Nordicism and Anglocentrism, amplified by the obsessions with Hitler and Nazi race doctrine, and so these paradigms are too deeply embedded within the Old Movement to be effectively opposed from within. The same holds for Old Movement dogma outside America, with Anglocentrism being of course prominent in the Anglosphere “movement,” and Hitlerian thought being prominent among activists in “Germanic” Europe.  However, that all applies specifically to Der Movement – the Old Movement – not to society at large, and not to the nucleus of activists who could, under the right circumstances, initiate the development of a New Movement.

But, again, I’m pessimistic. 

What Should Be Done, Again


Every once in a while at this blog, I find it useful – albeit somewhat repetitious for long time readers – to discuss the strategies that I believe that (American, but also applicable throughout the White world) racial nationalism needs to implement in order to make progress and achieve objectives.  As noted, this has been discussed here before.  Also see this.

1. Build a legionary cadre.  No defectives, no Alt Right lulzers, no obsessives and fetishists, no zombies mindlessly parroting “movement” dogma, but hardcore, “vanguardist” political soldiers, truly vetted (extremely!) and put through years of long apprenticeship, a genuine movement akin to that of Codreanu, a pan-European Brotherhood that will form the core of the undermining of the old System and the creation of a new one.  And guess what?  This is not talked about in “interviews” with the media, it is not recruited online in sniggering “forums,” it is instead done privately and prudently, slowly, carefully, and with forethought.  Obviously, the existence of such an organization would not be a secret, just as the existence of the CIA, MI6, KGB, and GRU were not secrets, but the inner workings of the group, by analogy to those others, would of course be hidden from the public.  

2. Community activism.  Real community activism is done, not talked about.  It is done as much as possible “under the radar.”  You do not broadcast it to mocking media operatives, you don’t go through the motions for the sake of a quick blog post, this is not something done overnight.  True community activism is for the long-term, it is a work of years, it is done to help the community, not with an attitude of expecting an immediate compensation – the idea of compensation should not come into it at all. Of course, community activism by its nature cannot be kept secret; the point is that such activism is its own publicity – in other words, it becomes known because it occurs and it is effective, it is its own advertisement, it doesn’t become known because activists spend more time talking to the media than they do actually helping people.

3. Metapolitics and infrastructure. Metapolitics has been discussed endlessly by the Far Right, and so there is no need to repeat all of that here. Such activity is essential, as long as it is fresh, creative, and open-minded, and not merely the regurgitation of fossilized “movement” dogma.  We need real infrastructure to carry out our objectives, approaches to defeat social pricing, funding that goes beyond tin cup panhandling but actual involves earning money through some sort of productivity, service, and/or representation, we need lawyers (and not to drive them out of the “movement”), we need businessmen, doctors, academics, plumbers, mechanics, schoolteachers, politicians, we need a recreated and actualized society. By the way, metapolitics should include Salter’s democratic multiculturalism, which overlaps with both community activism and electoral politics.

4. Electoral politics. This has three purposes.  First, education, propaganda, and recruitment.  Second, provocation, heightening the contradictions, undermining the System, promoting chaos and balkanization.  Third, if elected, these people can not only leverage their office for the preceding two purposes, but also to protect the movement as much as possible.

5. Rallies, etc. – false-flag and genuine. False-flag rallies are meant as a distraction, to focus attention of adversaries to the open and superficial “cosplay actors on the street” as opposed to the more serious work going on elsewhere.  It would still need to be credible, to be viewed as a genuine threat and so worthy of attention, and also so as not to repulse Whites interested in joining the cause.  Later on, with the success of the other objectives 1-4 above, rallies and mass meetings, of a highly professional nature (even more so that the false-flag ones), can occur for all the positives such events can genuinely provide to a real and growing firmly established movement.

I would once again like to describe what I think should be done, so as to pre-emptively answer the screeching of the Quota Queens, who would falsely accuse me of only criticizing and not offering constructive suggestions. I have of course often given such suggestions, as noted above, and will do so again now. Let us consider the three major legs of the strategic tripod.

1. Electoral Politics

I have often talked about the need for involvement in electoral politics, as well as the wasted opportunity right after 2016. Right wing populism was “hot,” there was momentum; prudent planning could have set up some interesting local campaigns for 2018.  But, instead, the Quota Queens gave us Unite the Right, drunken podcasts, the Pilleater Chronicles, and all the rest.  But the wheel turns and as the Left exposes their insanity for all the world to see, and as Trump exposes himself as an insincere, semi-retarded fraud, there may once again be room for maneuver on the Far Right edges of American electoral politics.

2. Metapolitical education

There is not much need to discuss this here, as it is straightforward, and it is the one thing of the three that Der Movement is actually focusing on right now. Of course, I believe that Der Movement is doing a terrible job of it, doing more harm than good.  But as far as the type of activity, then, for example, the type of thing done by Counter-Currents would be an example of metapolitics, although I of course almost completely disagree with their content.  

3. Infrastructure/Community/Organization

What is meant by this?

Infrastructure – this covers such things including, but not limited to, financial resources, physical structures such as headquarters and meeting halls, competent personnel, equipment, a very competent and aggressive legal team, media resources, publishing, Internet hosting, and all of the various things required for the day-today running of a dissent movement, and its constituent organizations and groupuscules, in the context of operating in a hostile System.  

Community – you can read some of the ideas I proposed in my interview with Robert Griffin (long ago) in his One Sheaf One Vine book as examples of things we can do for outreach to the broader White community. And of course, community building can mean for our own people, setting up alternative community structures, leveraging infrastructure (see above) to defeat social pricing and allow pro-White activists to survive and thrive in a hostile System environment, and all of this can range from meetings at the small scale to actual physical communities, relatively self-sufficient, at the large scale.  And, as stated, we need outreach to the broader White population to provide assistance to them (and receive such in return) and for recruitment.

Organization – we will need the spectrum of organizational complexity, from slime mold to rhizome.

One crucial component, which overlaps with the need for community (and for metapolitical education) is the Legionary concept.  To be successful, we need The New Man.  We need a “school of palingenesis” in which activists can be reborn, improved in every way, particularly morally and spiritually. Given inherent problems with Whites in general, and pro-White activists in particular, today, this is essential.

This infrastructure/community/organization component will be the most difficult section of the three-part strategy to actualize.  After all, metapolitical education is already occurring; although I disagree with most of it and most of it is currently at a low level of quality, at least the pattern is established, and such education is scalable from the individual blogger up to a large scale organization or political campaign. Such education requires less organization and discipline for success than the other components, particularly the last one. Political campaigns can be done and the open and more “mainstream” nature of those endeavors also proves some leeway in the competence of its actualization.  

However, building community, infrastructure, and quality vanguardist organizations will require a very high level of competence, prudence, foresight, sanity, and reasonableness, all qualities profoundly lacking in the “movement.”  Look at the disasters that have occurred when any of this has been tried in even a crude initial form. Can you imagine?  You’ll have a bunch of Nutzis marching around screaming “Pepe,” “Kek,” “Jews will not replace us,” agonizing over the dire racial threat of hora-dancing Romanians and two foot tall Southern Italian Africans, while allowing homosexual sexual harassment and transparently obvious infiltrations. Actualizing these objectives will require the New Movement I have proposed.  The Old Movement will be completely incapable of doing what needs to be done.  They’ll just make a mess of everything, strangle it in the crib.

Each of these strategies synergizes with the other two.  The electoral campaigns provide a platform for propaganda, thus boosting metapolitical education and the campaigns can enhance community building, organization, and infrastructure – at the very least bringing like-mined people together and giving them real-world training in running an important endeavor.  In the unlikely event any of the candidates are elected, this would be a practical asset if they can use their position to provide assistance and protection (to the extent possible) for the other legs of the strategy, and, of course, such a victory would be a boost for morale and a propaganda asset. Metapolitical education provides the ideological framework for the other two components, and is a crucial component in recruiting people for those other components. Infrastructure/Community/Organization actualizes the metapolitical education into reality, it is the real-world outcome of metapolitical/education/propaganda efforts, and it provides the raw material in personnel, infrastructure, and other resources to assist in the other two legs of the overarching strategy.

And if we fail, I for one at least offered a generalized scheme for a back-up plan.  Meanwhile your “leaders” endorse Tulsi Gabbard and Andrew Yang, or scream about “Pepe” and “Kek.”  Your choice, my friends. Real, serious, sober leadership or comically inept infantile grifters. We all know the outcome of that choice now, don’t we?

In any case, once again, this is what needs to be done.  This is what should have been done after the 2016 election, this is what should have been done in the years and decades preceding, and this is what needs to be done going forward, starting now.

Will it be done?  Of course not.  With your majestic leaders, dancing through cemeteries with swastika-soled boots, expect nothing more than continued endless failure.

Sallis’ Law in Action

Mathematical certainty.

Let’s remember Sallis’ Law:

“As a “movement” discussion grows longer, the probability of someone commenting about racial admixture in Southern Europeans and/or Eastern Europeans approaches 1″; that is, if a “movement” discussion (regardless of topic or scope) goes on long enough, sooner or later (typically sooner) someone will question the “Whiteness” of Southern Europeans and/or Eastern Europeans, the point at which effectively the discussion or thread descends into Nordicism, ethnic fetishism, and fossilized “movement” dogma.

This has been on perfect display in the comments thread on a (typically inane) Dutton (*) Jolly Heretic YouTube video. The subject of the video was the Irish, and this is what showed up there reasonably quickly, emphasis added:

Equalizing Force

Can you please do a video on the effects of the Islamic invasion of southern  and eastern Europe .

Super Mega SS 88 Ultra Rightwing Purity Death Squad

Super Mega SS 88 Ultra Rightwing Purity Death Squad

Equalizing Force Which one? lol

Dr. Edward Dutton: The Jolly Heretic

Dr. Edward Dutton: The Jolly Heretic

Yes.i will.



Oh goody

@Dr. Edward Dutton: The Jolly Hereticcheers,  I’ll buy you a beer 😁 in particular I have always wondered why the north of Italy and Spain seem to be the economic power houses of these countries and I was wondering if this is because their advancement was haulted.  When i was traveling in Italy one local joked there is Italy then thete is the South  LOL. I have heard people from northern Spain say the same about Spain. Greece obviously is not the Nation of classical Greece.

Iron Fortitude

Iron Fortitude

@Jay Mazella There’s North African and Middle Eastern admixture in the Southern European population. Additionally, the Germanics literally had the National Socialist party which was encouraging them to have tons of children and populate new lands. Furthermore, Germanics have higher average IQ, etc. Southern Europe is just a poor shithole that they would rather not remain in because North Western Europe is far better.

Once again – all of that was from a video about Ireland and the Irish.  Readers of this blog may be tired of me saying “Sallis is always right” but that’s just too bad – Sallis is always right.

Amusingly, one of the fetishists in that thread chastises an objecting “Med” – saying that this is an important topic regardless of how people like you (i.e., swarthoids) try to ridicule it.  As if discussion of racial admixture in Southern and Eastern Europe is being suppressed, and has not actually been discussed literally (and conservatively) thousands of times by now. If you want to consider a racial history topic that actually has been suppressed in Der Movement – that would be racial admixture in (Anglo-Scando-Germanic) Northern Europe, a topic which I’m sure Dutton will not be covering, with beer or otherwise.

I will assume that at least some readers of EGI Notes are racial nationalist types who are of Southern and/or Eastern European ancestry.  Let me take this opportunity to repeat advice previously given here – that there really is no place for any of you in Der Movement, Inc., you should, for the most part, eschew any participation in it, and instead focus your activist energies in other directions. I’ve been involved in all of this for a quarter-century, and I can tell you, with all honesty and sincerity, that, as regards the “official” American “movement” goes, you will never be taken seriously, never be treated with respect, never be considered as an equal, and you will never have the luxury of being confident that you will not ever be excluded based on ethnicity.

Now, the “for the most part” above is for the caveat that if you believe that your participation will be sufficiently significant that you can have a real impact on whatever corner of Der Movement you are in, and that you can actualize a truly pan-European mindset in that corner, then go ahead and do so, although I believe it is more likely than not that you will eventually be disappointed.  That aside, avoid Der Movement and all its works – definitely don’t be a low level rank-and-file stepandfetchit because you’ll always be working for someone else’s interests and not your for own.

What should you do? If you can find some real racial nationalist activity that is truly pan-European, independent of Der Movement, Inc., then certainly you should invest in that (but you should be aware that the Nordicists and various other fetishists will continuously attempt to hijack any such activity – they cannot abide any manifestation of racialist activity that professes beliefs different from their own). You can also support endeavors like EGI Notes, by spreading the word about the blog, linking to posts that you find useful, etc. You can promote whatever pan-European ideas and essays you may find, either my own or from anyone else. You can start your own blog, your own groupuscule, and build something to attract like-minded people. What will eventually be necessary is a pan-European New Movement – a real movement whose basic foundation of belief would be such that it would be impervious to any of the aforementioned attempts at ideological hijacking. Such a New Movement would be in opposition to the retarded fraud of Der Movement, Inc. 

After all, even if Der Movement was not hostile to you (and it is), do you really want to be associated with that bunch of grifters, idiots, and losers?  And associated with freaks calling themselves “Super Mega SS 88 Ultra Rightwing Purity Death Squad”- essentially like the parodies I make here?

The latest humiliation for them is another slap in the face from their Aryan Avatar Princess Taylor Swift (**).  Emphasis added:

“I always have and always will cast my vote based on which candidate will protect and fight for the human rights I believe we all deserve in this country,” Swift continued. “I believe in the fight for LGBTQ rights, and that any form of discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender is WRONG. I believe that the systemic racism we still see in this country towards people of color is terrifying, sickening and prevalent.”

Another public humiliation, another defeat, another embarrassment, another rejection.  Another in an endless series.  

*Dutton, never forget, is an HBDer and a Lynnite.  His “takedown” of Rushton, while seemingly laudable, may have been motivated by the same objectives as those liberals who have been leaking information about Saint Martin of King – to try and attenuate a response by getting out in front of a scandal and defusing it.  Rushton’s perfidy would have eventually come out in full, and could have discredited the HBD fraud; however, having an “honest” HBDer expose Rushton allows the HBD political movement to march on relatively unscathed.  Then there is the fact that Rushton was the main competition to Lynn as King HBD and with Rushton smeared in Der Movement it allows Tricky Dick to be solely worshipped once he too kicks the bucket.

*Yes, yes, I know – they’ll say that the Swift obsession was just “ironic trolling.”  Don’t buy that retconning for one minute. Go back several years and all the numbnuts were breathlessly speculating that Swift was a “secret Trump supporter” and her previous reluctance to talk about politics was indicative of “right wing views.”  Wrong, wrong, they’re always wrong.

Sowing Dragon’s Teeth

Quo Vadis, “Movement?”

In the aftermath of Trump’s election, the Left was at a fork in the road, sociopolitically and strategically speaking. They could have chosen the path of conciliation, of trying to understand the grievances of White America, the path of making concessions in the hope of stabilizing a situation that, if left unstabilized, had the potential of disrupting the multicultural consensus.  Alternatively, they could have chosen the path of defiance, to double down on their anti-White agenda, to become even more extreme in their destructive militancy, to stand up to Trump and the Right, and to crush the spirit (and body) of White resistance. They chose the second path.  It was a wise choice (at least in the short term).

Suvorov’s Law of History: Revolutions do not occur at the time of greatest repression, but when that repression is suddenly relaxed. If the Left had become conciliatory, if they had relaxed the anti-White repression, if they had eased back and had made concessions, if – and this above all – they had granted legitimacy to the idea of White interests, then that would have started the ball rolling in the direction of an upheaval that had the potential of truly wrecking the multicultural system. If they had showed weakness, even the pathetic rightist guppies may have turned into sharks smelling blood in the water.

Whether from a careful reading of history, from political savvy, from instinct, or just as a side effect of blind hatred towards Whites, the Left avoided the error of easing up on the repression and instead took the other fork in the road – they doubled down, tripled down, quadrupled down and more, on the repression. The Left has unleashed a tidal wave of anti-White hatred, of repression of the Right, of a savage political correctness, the like of which has not heretofore been seen in America.

The Left took a gamble with their choice, of course.  If Trump has been a genuine man of the Right, a man of honor who promoted and defended his supporters, then the Left would have had a hard time of it.  If the Far Right had been clever, and had used the past two years on infrastructure-building, electoral politics, and real metapolitical education – never mind the most important task of building a New Movement to correct the flaws of the Old – then the Left would have been challenged by an authentic strong opposing force.  But the Left took the measure of Donald Trump and of the Far Right and rightfully found them wanting.  

However, whether or not the gamble will work for the Left in the long term depends on how the Far Right (I do not care about the Mainstream Right) deals with its own fork in the road. The Left is smarter than the Far Right (which is not saying much), but the word “smarter” implies a comparison in the relative sense. In an objective sense, the Left is stupid. Yes, given the situation they found themselves in after November 2016, they made the right decision, but why were they in that position to begin with?  They started boiling the frog of White dispossession too quickly; they were so intoxicated by their dominance and by their anti-White hatred that they did not realize that they were pushing too far too fast. 

So, yes, they made the right choice given their limited options. But ultimately the Left is sowing dragon’s teeth and they may one day reap the whirlwind.  If that happens, from their perspective it will be because they “inadvertently” caused “unforeseen negative consequences” due to their efforts “to make the world a better place,” but to the rest of us, the outcome was quite easily foreseen – IF the Far Right chooses the right direction. Does the Far Right follow the same old path of failure and disaster or does it take a fresh path, a new path, and remake a failed “movement” into a real movement that will make the Left pay for its gamble? We need to take advantage of all those sown dragon’s teeth, all the bitterness and balkanization the Left has created, and force the Left to a new fork in the road.  But this time if they choose to push back with more repression, they’ll find a Far Right ready and willing to push back, and push back hard; on the other hand, if the Left backs down and chooses conciliation, we need a Far Right ready and willing to accept nothing but total victory, to keep on pushing, and not “declare victory (prematurely) and go home” as it usually does.  We need a Far Right ready to push past conciliation into revolution.

No more Men on White Horses, not more Yang Gangs, no more stupidity – ourselves alone – and with real leadership, not affirmative action basket cases driving us to one disaster after another.  There is the fork in the road – one path to deliverance, the other to the abyss.  Which one to take?

Quo Vadis?

Racing the Red Queen

What should we do?

Read this.

Also read this.

The Quota Queens like to say that their critics do not offer alternative approaches. That is, of course, a bald-faced lie; I have many times outlined strategies and tactics.  Here I do so again, with an emphasis on adaption – adapting to the situation your enemy puts you in, challenging that enemy with your own pressure, forcing the enemy to prove that they can adapt to your new tactics, and if they do, then you counter-adapt yourself.  Racing the Red Queen. Do things different – the same old story of “education” and “D’Nations” accomplishes nothing except enrich the grifters.

The fact that the enemy may adapt to your new tactics is no reason for not trying those tactics.  Quite the opposite.  You should take advantage of any opportunity to move into new strategic and tactical niche spaces, and you should force your opponent to prove they can effectively adapt to your new approaches. This is the Red Queen Hypothesis in action.  Constant adaption and response to the adaption of others, an evolutionary arms race, is part of the reality of evolved organisms, and it is part of the reality of successful movements as well.

In military history, nations come up with new weapons and tactics, gain an advantage, then see that advantage lost as their opponent adapts and compensates.  Then newer weapons and tactics are devised. In sports, a player or a team has an approach, is successful, then must change when the opponent adapts. No one gives up in advance.  A nation does not say “Hey, if we come up with an ICBM, our opponent will come up with an anti-ballistic missile system, so what’s the point?”  No, they build their missiles, and they FORCE the opposition to prove they can come up with an effective response, at which point the process of adaption and counter-adaption continues.  A baseball, player may be unable to hit a curveball, so pitchers feed him a steady diet of curveballs.  Either he adapts and learns to hit the curveball, or he’s finished. The pitcher does not say, “Hey, I better not throw curveballs, he may learn to hit them, I’ll just throw fastballs and get hammered.”  No, FORCE the other fellow to prove they can adapt, put pressure on him, test him, exhaust him, and if he does adapt, then you counter-adapt in turn.

At some point, it is possible that one side is no longer able to adapt.  Species become extinct.  Nations are defeated and wiped from the face of history.  Baseball players retire when they cannot perform. So it goes.  We must FORCE the System to prove it can adapt – after all, that’s what they are doing to us.  At some point, one side or the other will reach a breaking point.  Better them than us. But if we do nothing, business as usual with no adaption, we are doomed to extinction.

Now, one can make an argument that – rarely – it may be prudent to keep a strategy in reserve for use at the most propitious time, but that should not be an excuse for inaction, for business as usual.  To the extent that some aspect of an overarching strategy should be kept in strategic reserve, that’s an issue for high-level discussion and debate (in private, among real leaders, none of which currently exist).  Given our current situation, I don’t see that any of the things proposed here should be kept in reserve.  These are all obvious and necessary things that need to be done now.  Thus:

1. Get out in the real world, the analog world, stop being so dependent on the Internet.  I am NOT saying to stop digital activism, of course not. That’s what this blog is, after all.  But we are going to have to get back into “meat space,” and do it correctly.

2. Finally, defectives must be eschewed.  Finally, we need to stress quality over quantity – not just talk about it, as the Quota Queens like to do, but actually DO IT.  I talk about identifying defectives here, and the need for ruthless intolerance here. Is this a person who you would be comfortable associating with in private life?  Are they a drug addict?  A pervert?  A freak?  A tin-foil-hat conspiracy theorist?  Some bizarre ethnic fetishist?  An effeminate?  A hedonistic womanizing gamester?  Someone with a non-White (usually Asian) spouse?  A grifter?  A gambler?  A hypocrite?  A video gamester or porn gobbler, spending all their time indoors, indulging in their vice?  How about saying NO to these people?

We should follow the lead of Codreanu and the Legionary Movement.  The New Man comes first, THEN we worry about programs and policies.  We need BETTER PEOPLE, and then we worry about nitpicking details of ideology.  You would think that “race realists” and “eugenicists” would understand the need for better people. The point is, the “better” is not only racial characteristics and IQ – it is basic character more than anything else.

3. A real pro-White movement should be for all Whites.  If a group or leader purports to be for “all Whites” – which most do – then they should walk the walk, not just talk the talk.  We need an end to the ethnic fetishism and the affirmative action program.  All the low hanging fruit of dissatisfied and potentially ethnocentric White ethnics should be picked – and not just for dues-paying stepandfetchits, but as equal and valued members of the endeavor. I realize that Der Movement’s ideology is that the White ethnics are stupid and inferior, and so the supposition is that these people can continue to be hoodwinked, but, no, you can’t fool all of the people all of the time. The sort of intelligent and productive people you would (or should) really want to recruit will soon realize that they are being taken advantage of, being asked to sacrifice for someone else’s interests. That assumes such people are being recruited to begin with, that they are not ignored or actively repulsed.

4. We need a real media presence, our own presence, not to be dependent upon the System.  “But we have no money,” the Quota Queens cry.  That’s a lie   Here’s your money.

5. Get involved in electoral politics.  Force the System to become an OVERT banana republic (or like the EU – which is the same thing) and ban political parties, jail opposition candidates, censor political campaigns, etc.  Force them to unmask themselves, force them to make it open and plain to White Americans that the System is an oppressive sham. Either the System goes on that path, which in the long term is untenable for stability, or they accept White nationalism in the political arena, which is also untenable for stability.  Ultimately, once we get over the rough patches, it is win-win for us, and lose-lose for them, IF done correctly. To be done correctly, see all the other things, discussed above, which also needs to be done.  I discussed the political option in more detail previously:

It is one thing to deplatform a blogger or YouTuber.  It is one thing to engage in lawfare against cosplayers and their enablers in Charlottesville.  It is one thing to label powerless “movement leaders “as “national security threats.”  It is one thing to push “hate crime and speech laws” against the atomized Internet lumpenproletariat.

But it is another thing entirely to publicly engage in overt banana republic tactics to shut down political campaigns, persecute political opponents, and censor political candidates.  Yes, America is far down the road to leftist victory, yes the System is corrupt and anti-White and degenerate and illegitimate, and yes Whites usually take abuse unlimited without reacting and fighting back.  Yes, that is all true.  But, still…there are limits to all of that, even now.  There are limits to how far the System will go at this time. And I believe those limits fall just short of the System completely unmasking itself, it falls just short of overtly shutting down the political opposition.

Yes, there will be ridicule.  Yes, there will be unfair media coverage and smears.  Yes, if things are going too well, then they’ll try a media blackout and ignore us.  Yes, the System will allow their Antifa hired hands run wild with impunity.  But all these things are happening now, are happening already (under the Far-Left God Emperor), so that’s nothing new.  If the “movement” is concerned with increased official persecution, then it may be prudent to shift at least some of the activist efforts into an arena in which the System will incur real costs – very serious costs indeed – if they try to censor and directly interfere.  And that arena is the political arena – the arena that Joe and Jill Sixpack consider sacrosanct in their faded vision of what America used to be.

If the System wants to shut down White advocacy, then make it as difficult and as painful and as potentially self-destructive for them as possible.  Force them into the position in which the only way to shut down White advocacy is to engage in blatant and public banana republic third world authoritarianism, force them to either accept White advocacy in the political arena or risk unmasking themselves to White America several decades too early.

The riposte would be – but, political candidates can be persecuted.  Just look at Le Pen in France!   My response is that we have to act now, before things get to that point, leveraging the meager First Amendment protections we have left. Yes, if we do nothing now, eventually we’ll reach the point of Europe and well beyond – well beyond because social pricing is worse in the USA, so if we lose the remaining constitutional brakes to leftist tyranny, we will be in fact worse than Europe.  Again, that’s why it is imperative to get started now.  And, again, the American situation, culture, and traditions of free speech (never mind the legalistic constitutional protections) are quite different than in Europe.  What France can do with minimal blowback would result in a rather unpleasant reaction here, even among cowardly omega race White Americans.  We may eventually reach the level of France, and worse, but for now, it’s not the same.  The cost/benefit ratio for the American System is different from that of France.

The System will adapt to these changes? Maybe. Let them prove it.  Let them exhaust themselves doing it.  Let them expose themselves as hypocritical mendacious totalitarians to do it. Let them awaken even the most retarded cucked White weaklings to do it. Note to Der Movement: The System has already adapted to all your current tactics – your “shitposting,” your “D’Nations,” your “education” and “metapolitics,” your freakishness, your affirmative action policy, all of it.  The Red Queen has passed you by, my friends, passed you by in a speeding automobile while you stay gibbering incoherently on the street corner. In the continuous evolutionary arms race between competing ideologies, the System adapts, and the Far Right – allegedly all about “eugenics” and “biology” and “memes” and “evolution”- stays stagnant, repeating the same mistakes over and over again.  The Yang Gang will save us!  Come one now, at this point, isn’t it obvious that business as usual is an utter failure? It is a failure for actual activist accomplishment, admittedly not a failure as a money-making enterprise for all of your fearless leaders.