Category: Nick Griffin

Nick Griffin on the Alt Right

Food for thought.

I’m no fan of Nick Griffin, nor do I agree with his ideology, but his book AltRight – NotRight is useful in exposing some of the insanity of the Alt Right – you know, the stupidity that I was denouncing from its very beginning, while all the Quota Queens were openly praising and identifying with it.

Some of Griffin’s warnings about the homosexual cabal and their agenda of “pinkwashing” (Griffin’s word) are useful, and he has interesting things to say about Jez Turner (that I neither endorse nor reject, since I know little about the man), including Turner’s association with Greg Johnson, which are too lengthy to quote here, so read Griffin’s book.

Griffin:

It is also simply impossible to import homosexuals into any group without them bringing with them their scratch-your-eyes-out, handbags at dawn hostility to people with whom they fall out.

Err, yes.  Watch out, Nick, you’re “crazy and bitter.”

This is interesting:

Given the close connections between Johnson and Richard Spencer – the Counter-Currents boss is a regular speaker at NPI events – it remains to be seen what will happen to Arktos if Friberg and Jorjani fall out over the former’s increasingly strident condemnations of homosexuality and the latter’s acquiescence (to say the least) in the pinkwashing of the movement.

I’m not sure when Griffin wrote that.  It seems the book was published in 2017, at which time Johnson and Spencer had seemingly already fallen out. If Griffin actually wrote that earlier, then he is somewhat prescient, given that not only did Johnson end his association (at least insofar as I can see) with NPI, but Jorjani did indeed have a falling out with the Spencer-Friberg fraction (although that seemed to be more about Iranians than about homosexuals).

Note this:

It is worth noting here that the Hungarian government explained its 2014 expulsion of Richard Spencer on the grounds that its security services had concluded that he was a CIA agent seeking to embarrass Viktor Orban…

I never participated in this fad of accusing activists of being “Feds” or “CIA assets”- that strikes me as truly paranoid, but here it seems Griffin is simply repeating the excuse of the Hungarians, so we can take it for what its worth.

Now, here is what Griffin claims is a quote from an individual that Johnson stated will be one of the voices of WN 3.0:

These are refrains I’ve heard endlessly repeated as the discussion over WHITE SHARIA has advanced. They are coming from women and a few weak men countersignaling the WHITE SHARIA meme. Rape is a property crime and nothing more. First a crime against the property of the father, and then a crime against the property of the husband. …hitting a woman out of her head was seen as benevolent and a universal necessity in every marriage until the sixties, and even portrayed positively in movies and film. Regular slapping and the occasional vicious beating of a woman was a necessity in every household..

Keep in mind that Johnson poses as a White Knighter (“Joan of Arc!”), criticizing activists for their alleged misogyny.  Interesting.

Griffin concludes:

What must be done is very simple: A ‘No Platform’ policy ruthlessly enforced in each and every organisation. Do not give homosexualists a platform. Do not share a platform with homosexualists. Do not advertise platforms run by or favouring homosexualists. And publicly admonish those who break this rule.

We do not have to agree or accept all of Griffin’s accusations to understand what a disaster the Alt Right has been.  The historical evidence of the last few years is clear, underscored by the fact that several of the main Alt Right leaders no longer identify as such.

What all of you out there need to decide is this – who is more worthy of being listened to, whose judgment should you accept?  Those who were 100% on the Alt Right train and who lectured us all that “The Alt Right is White nationalism or it is nothing at all”  OR those who were warning you as far back as four years ago that the Alt Right was a destructive disaster, with a short shelf life, and that it should be eschewed before it takes racial activism down with it when it collapses?

What’s more important to you?  Sound judgment and merit-based leadership or your ethnic fetishism and your acceptance of a strict “movement” ethnic affirmative action program?

Your choice.

Golden Dawn Update, 2/9/15

Some people speaking up for what’s right.
I’ll give Griffin credit here for speaking up for what is right; Fiore as well.  They contrast to the despicable Marine Le Pen, siding with the forces persecuting the Golden Dawn movement.  Le Pen had better hope she gets elected, governs as a hard nationalist, and triggers a nationalist chain reaction throughout Europe – because that would be the only practical (not moral) justification for her contemptible behavior.
Otherwise, if it’s all for naught, I doubt hardcore nationalists would ever forgive, much less forget, what she has done.