Category: Nick Griffin

Odds and Ends, 11/19/20

In der news.

To White liberals, the real attitude toward celebrating things such as Black History Month is akin to a normal person celebrating a spastic retard finishing an event in the Special Olympics.

I suspect non-Whites detect this condescending attitude, which is why they are constantly seething with rage even against their “White allies.”  Racial resentment, racial envy, is likely at the root of most anti-White hostility. This is why Black females have the justifiable stereotype of always being angry – physical appearance is the most important thing for hominid females (and they know this, even if SJW “feminists” angrily deny it), and Black females must know that they are considered the most unattractive and undesirable among all of the major racial groups’ females. They see their co-racial males greatly preferring White women, and so they seethe with rage. When White liberals smile at Black invention myths or at some pitifully minor real Negro accomplishment, Blacks must really be boiling inside. To openly admit what is bothering them would be an overt admission of their self-realization of their perceived racial inferiority, so instead it comes out as an incoherent attack on “Whiteness” as a general principle – even “White allies” are tainted by “implicit bias” and the original sin of “White racism,” enriched as they are in their “White Privilege,” and so these Whites must be endlessly subjected to ritualistic humiliation. That gives the non-Whites a feeling of revenge and alleviates the guilt felt by White liberals for their covert self-realization of their own perceived racial superiority.

I suspect the same elements of resentment, revenge, and guilt inform radical feminism and sexualized “female domination” and “male submission” – both parties implicitly understand the reality of male superiority, and so it is manifested in various bizarre ideas and rituals. Then we get into Nietzsche’s ideas about ressentiment and slave morality that are related to the genesis of Christianity. There is a common underlying thread in these phenomena – resentment about a (perceived) realization of inferiority of one party, and feelings of guilt about a (perceived) realization of superiority of the other party.

And if this post is used as “evidence” that I am a “White supremacist” please note that I am specifically discussing the attitudes of White liberals and of non-Whites, both of whom behave in a manner indicating deep-seated attitudes of superiority and inferiority, respectively.

From my perspective, Whites are superior in some aspects, particularly cultural, scientific, and technical creativity, but are grossly inferior in others, such as adaptive fitness. Likewise, women are superior in being mothers and mothering, with men superior in just about everything else. Christian ressentiment is superior in propagating a slave morality, while more noble values are superior in every other way.

How other people perceive and act upon racial and sexual differences is for them to answer for, not me.  Christian ressentiment is for the Christians to answer for, not me.

What dope hired Bolton?

OK, I agree, but that doesn’t mean we can’t harshly critique Trump.

Someone who understands the disgusting pathetic turd that is Trump:

But we have to be realistic; the historically significant highpoint of the day was the President’s failure to join his vast army of loving, angry and motivated supporters. This was a terrible and tragic error which will cost Donald Trump and America dear.

What should have happened? At the very least, the President should gave given up an afternoon’s golf and spent a couple of hours with his crowd, chatting and giving the lucky few the selfies of their lives. A couple of hours returning the love and telling the faithful to be on standby and to get organised. This isn’t exactly political rocket science, it’s just common sense and decency.

You can measure the missed opportunity and the mentality of the man by asking: what would George Washington have done? Or Teddy Roosevelt, or JFK, or even Reagan or Obama? Anyone of them would have stood on the back of a pick-up, taken a bullhorn and given the speech of his life, the speech that made all the difference. Donald Trump gave a few waves and went off in his armoured limo to play golf.

Trump supporters assert that it would have been an unnecessary “security risk” for Trump to have physically addressed the crowd. Two responses to this are as follows.

First, if Trump had planned in advance to address the crowd, proper security measures could have been put in place. Second, at least he could have stayed in the White House and perhaps addressed the crowd via video. He didn’t have to go and play golf, for godssakes. Get a grip, Trump worshippers.

Why is Trump declaring himself a candidate for 2024?  Likely because he and his advisors believe that is a way to try to preclude federal prosecution – since it may “look bad” for Biden to be politically persecuting a future electoral rival (state prosecution would still be in play).  Of course, that depends upon the Left actually caring what they “look” like. Also, being in the electoral mix would not doubt be good for fund-raising and whatever other grifts Trump has in mind for the next four years.

Coulter on Trump:

“The reason I’m very happy that [President] Trump lost – and lost narrowly – is that a second term of Trump would have killed us,” Coulter said…“[W]ith Trump … He’d say these wild things that we’d get blamed for, he’d get attacked on, and then actually did nothing,” she explained…“Trump thinks, ‘I tweeted it. Therefore, it’s done’,” Coulter said…“It’s ironic … that he lost this election, very possibly because of cheating. Democrats cheat all the time. … Trump has been talking about ‘mail-in ballots are dangerous, they’re gonna steal this election.’ He’s been talking about it … probably all year,” she said….“Talking about it isn’t the same as doing it,” Coulter pointed out. “Much like as he tweeted out, ‘Law and Order,’ and yet cities are still burning across the nation. [He] didn’t do anything about it. It’s like he didn’t know he was president.”

More Boomer-bashing from Millennial/Zoomer retards.

…most are out-of-shape Boomers. This reveals a severe inferiority complex. Most of these people know consciously and/or subconsciously that they could never have the pride of wearing a uniform, be it military or law enforcement. They are weak, fat, and uninured to hardship.

Unlike youngsters today, who are more overweight/obese than any similar age cohort in history, who spend most of their free time with their faces stuck into a smart phone, with their lipid-enhanced jowls sagging down onto the screen. Various forms of cancer, heretofore typically observed only in the middle-aged and old, are now occurring in the young, and these are cancers known to be associated with being physically inactive lumps of lard.

So, the question for a typical youth of today is – which is bigger: their pot belly or the colon tumor festering in their large intestine alongside the remains of poorly digested Big Macs?

See this nonsense.  Essentially, Sallis is correct once again. You see, with Counter-Currents as part of the HBD alliance, we must leave room in America for “Rosie and the kids.” Also note how this “10% alien is OK” “90% White nationalism” allows the Herrenvolk to colonize other people’s nations. Morgan occupying Hungary? He’s a ten percenter! Munro in Romania?  Farrell in Italy?  Full Moon Ancestry and “Bang East Europe?” The urinals of Europe’s men’s rooms haunted by shifty-eyed and hot-handed Quota Queens?  High-IQ Jews and Asians running America?  it’s all A-OK!  Hart’s vision or a multiracial “White separatist state” including “Asians and others” and his newer vision of a “conservative state” including “conservative Blacks” comes to pass under “ethnonationalist” “leadership.” The ethnonationalist filth lie to you about how pan-Europeanism will “violate national sovereignty” while in reality it are the pan-Europeanists who support homogeneous nation states, while the ethnonationalists want to ensure the survival of multiculturalism so as to empower their favorite minorities and/or to justify the hypocrisy of having “ethnonationalist” ethnoimperialists living in other people’s nations.

Remember – there is no way out but through Johnson.  White nationalism can flourish only if Johnson and Counter-Currents are unalterably opposed.

Counter-Currents supports de facto multiculturalism.  EGI Notes opposes multiculturalism.  The distinction is clear, no?

Nick Griffin on the Alt Right

Food for thought.

I’m no fan of Nick Griffin, nor do I agree with his ideology, but his book AltRight – NotRight is useful in exposing some of the insanity of the Alt Right – you know, the stupidity that I was denouncing from its very beginning, while all the Quota Queens were openly praising and identifying with it.

Some of Griffin’s warnings about the homosexual cabal and their agenda of “pinkwashing” (Griffin’s word) are useful, and he has interesting things to say about Jez Turner (that I neither endorse nor reject, since I know little about the man), including Turner’s association with Greg Johnson, which are too lengthy to quote here, so read Griffin’s book.


It is also simply impossible to import homosexuals into any group without them bringing with them their scratch-your-eyes-out, handbags at dawn hostility to people with whom they fall out.

Err, yes.  Watch out, Nick, you’re “crazy and bitter.”

This is interesting:

Given the close connections between Johnson and Richard Spencer – the Counter-Currents boss is a regular speaker at NPI events – it remains to be seen what will happen to Arktos if Friberg and Jorjani fall out over the former’s increasingly strident condemnations of homosexuality and the latter’s acquiescence (to say the least) in the pinkwashing of the movement.

I’m not sure when Griffin wrote that.  It seems the book was published in 2017, at which time Johnson and Spencer had seemingly already fallen out. If Griffin actually wrote that earlier, then he is somewhat prescient, given that not only did Johnson end his association (at least insofar as I can see) with NPI, but Jorjani did indeed have a falling out with the Spencer-Friberg fraction (although that seemed to be more about Iranians than about homosexuals).

Note this:

It is worth noting here that the Hungarian government explained its 2014 expulsion of Richard Spencer on the grounds that its security services had concluded that he was a CIA agent seeking to embarrass Viktor Orban…

I never participated in this fad of accusing activists of being “Feds” or “CIA assets”- that strikes me as truly paranoid, but here it seems Griffin is simply repeating the excuse of the Hungarians, so we can take it for what its worth.

Now, here is what Griffin claims is a quote from an individual that Johnson stated will be one of the voices of WN 3.0:

These are refrains I’ve heard endlessly repeated as the discussion over WHITE SHARIA has advanced. They are coming from women and a few weak men countersignaling the WHITE SHARIA meme. Rape is a property crime and nothing more. First a crime against the property of the father, and then a crime against the property of the husband. …hitting a woman out of her head was seen as benevolent and a universal necessity in every marriage until the sixties, and even portrayed positively in movies and film. Regular slapping and the occasional vicious beating of a woman was a necessity in every household..

Keep in mind that Johnson poses as a White Knighter (“Joan of Arc!”), criticizing activists for their alleged misogyny.  Interesting.

Griffin concludes:

What must be done is very simple: A ‘No Platform’ policy ruthlessly enforced in each and every organisation. Do not give homosexualists a platform. Do not share a platform with homosexualists. Do not advertise platforms run by or favouring homosexualists. And publicly admonish those who break this rule.

We do not have to agree or accept all of Griffin’s accusations to understand what a disaster the Alt Right has been.  The historical evidence of the last few years is clear, underscored by the fact that several of the main Alt Right leaders no longer identify as such.

What all of you out there need to decide is this – who is more worthy of being listened to, whose judgment should you accept?  Those who were 100% on the Alt Right train and who lectured us all that “The Alt Right is White nationalism or it is nothing at all”  OR those who were warning you as far back as four years ago that the Alt Right was a destructive disaster, with a short shelf life, and that it should be eschewed before it takes racial activism down with it when it collapses?

What’s more important to you?  Sound judgment and merit-based leadership or your ethnic fetishism and your acceptance of a strict “movement” ethnic affirmative action program?

Your choice.

Golden Dawn Update, 2/9/15

Some people speaking up for what’s right.
I’ll give Griffin credit here for speaking up for what is right; Fiore as well.  They contrast to the despicable Marine Le Pen, siding with the forces persecuting the Golden Dawn movement.  Le Pen had better hope she gets elected, governs as a hard nationalist, and triggers a nationalist chain reaction throughout Europe – because that would be the only practical (not moral) justification for her contemptible behavior.
Otherwise, if it’s all for naught, I doubt hardcore nationalists would ever forgive, much less forget, what she has done.