Category: objective worthlessness of the White race

White Privilege Bullying

Lessons of the schoolyard.

I have written on this topic before, but it is useful to set down a brief but comprehensive summary of the problem.  Therefore, here I make three arguments:

1. White Privilege, as defined by the Left as racially-specific advantages possessed by Whites, does not exist.

2. Even if White Privilege existed, it would be justified.

3. Attacks against Whites, re: White Privilege, are simply bullying against Whites because Whites, as a race, are a bunch of pathetic, mewling, cowardly weaklings.

1. The argument that White Privilege does not exist can be briefly subdivided into three parts.

A. A people being demographically dispossessed in their own nations – even in their ancestral homelands of Europe – are obviously not privileged.  Mass immigration into White nations, against the wishes of the populace and imposed by a hostile elite, is not “privilege.”  It is genocide. Declining White birthrates and increasing White suicide rates are not signs of “privilege” – they are signs of oppression and despair.  The opioid crisis among White Americans is not “privilege” – it is hopelessness and despair.  The fact that most politicians in White nations are racially White means nothing, as most of them are openly hardcore anti-White.  The question should be – whose interests do those politicians represent?

B. A people discriminated against de jure by law (affirmative action, hate speech laws in Europe that criminalize natives speaking up in defense of their own group interests) and de facto by political correctness, pop culture, and social pricing, is not “privileged.”

A people not allowed to organize on the basis of their own identity and in defense of that identity and its interests are hardly “privileged” – it is the complete opposite.  A people whose racial spokesmen are attacked in the streets with impunity, mocked by the leftist establishment, ridiculed in their own nation by aliens, deplatformed by corporations, and selectively targeted by the legal system – such a people are the opposite of “privileged.”  The English in Rotherham were, and are, not “privileged.”  White Americans and Europeans who cannot safely walk the streets of their own cities are not “privileged.”  Compare James Watson – reduced to selling his Nobel Prize after being “unpersoned” for merely suggesting the possibility of racial differences in intelligence – to Al Sharpton – whose activist career is summarized here – who was a friend of Presidents (Obama), speaker at political conventions (Democrat), a mainstream political commentator (MSNBC) – and we see the reality of Colored Privilege vs. the fantasy of White Privilege.

C. Although I disagree with Sailer about the census, he is correct about “The Flight from White.”  You see, Whites are so privileged that groups petition to NOT officially be counted as White.  South Asians previously successfully removed themselves from the White category, and the MENA group wants to do the same now.  People with any hint of “Indian Princess” ancestry in their family trees are desperate to be seen as non-White.  Whites pose as non-White, trying to “pass” in the other direction.  It is a strange sort of “privilege” indeed that people are so very eager NOT to partake of; it seems that the “invisible backpack” is a burden too heavy for anyone to want to carry.

2. Even if it did really exist, White Privilege would be justified, because it would not be “privilege” at all, in the sense of an undeserved largess (which actually describes Colored Privilege).  One would not call Bill Gates “privileged” at Microsoft – it is his company.  The Chinese are not “privileged” in China – it is their own country.  Likewise, Whites are not “privileged” in their own nations – instead, it are the alien peoples given advantages in White countries who are the ones truly privileged.  And if White Americans are “privileged” because they have a higher per capita net worth than Blacks and Hispanics, then Jews and Asians are privileged even more.  Oh, the latter have their goodies because of “intelligence” and “hard work.”   Yeah, and Whites are pretty smart and hard-working too, by the way – building nations that Jews and Asians want to migrate to.  

3. If accusations of White Privilege are absurd – and they are – why do they exist?  It is the lesson of the schoolyard: those who are weak and allow themselves to be bullied will continue to suffer so.  Accusations of White Privilege made in the context of White Oppression and White Powerlessness are a form of bullying from the Left/Colored Alliance.  Because Whites are a race of pathetic mewling cowards and never push back against this bullying they can expect more of it, just like the boy who allows himself to be pushed around in the schoolyard can expect nothing but more abuse.  If the boy fights back, even if he loses, the bullying will likely stop, especially if he gets some good “licks” in; bullies do not like victims who fight back, since they prefer the meek and powerless.  The abusive bullying of Whites as a race will decline in proportion to the extent that Whites actively and explicitly defend their interests as a race.

Ironically, it is precisely because Whites are not privileged that they are accused of being so.  If Whites had true privilege no one would dare bring it up in fear of the consequences.  It is only because Whites are a subaltern low-caste group that they can be bullied and gaslighted by being accused of having “privilege” while they are in reality a vilified powerless group losing their nations and their future.

I suppose that the real, hidden meaning of “White Privilege” is the privilege of being born as someone of European descent, and all that means racially, and with respect to being a legitimate heir to the Classical and Western/Faustian High Cultures.  There’s racial envy and resentment involved, and a desire to tear down those that the Guks view, at least subconsciously, as better than themselves.

Advertisements

Internal Refugees?

The next liberal cause celebre?

The more rational of White leftist “progressives” should be wary of their enthusiastic defense of the “international law” assertion of the (virtually unlimited) rights of refugees to migrate and the equally expansive obligations of (White) nations to host them.

How about applying the same standards to internal refugees, officially called “internally displaced persons?”

Such people are not currently “legally” considered refugees, but, like anything else, properly applied SJW hysteria, Jewish activism, pressure groups, media campaigns, etc. – the whole System acting in concert – can change that.  

Imagine if “internally displaced persons” are given all the rights of international refugees.  Why, perhaps, White liberals in their gated communities and in their leafy blue state suburbs will be legally obligated to take in some ghetto Negro refugees from the inner city, Negro migrants fleeing the “urban warfare” of, say, Detroit and Chicago.  Open your doors wide!

Even more painful for the liberals would be if White bigots fleeing urban colored violence would be considered refugees, and the homes of White liberals had to be opened to take in the great unwashed of bad-White racists.  Not to worry, though, no chance of that scenario, just like, for example, White South Africans are mysteriously not accorded the same rights, and welcomed as refugees, as are Middle Easterners or Africans.

But the first scenario?  Forced racial integration and abrogation of White property rights, and the even more pernicious abrogation of private freedom of association (public being lost long ago), under the guise of “refugee rights?”  Not only possible, but increasingly likely, given continued and unabated SJW hysteria, Colored Privilege, and White cowardice.

You read it here first!

This is the lesson of the schoolyard: If someone is bullied and refuse to stand up for themselves and refuse to fight back, then they WILL be bullied continuously, without end.  However, if they do stand up for themselves and do fight back, get their licks in, do some damage to their opponent, then, even if they lose, it is unlikely that they will be bullied again.  Bullies tend to be cowards and look for easy prey, they look for those will won’t fight back. In other words, cowardly bullies target cowardly victims.

Whites as a race are akin to a cowardly bullied pansy who doesn’t fight back, won’t stand up for himself, and is therefore marked as easy pickings.  Whites being bullied to now accept feral coloreds as obligatory internal refugees would be just another example of White uselessness and cowardice.

But, perhaps, just perhaps, the Trump election was just the tip of the iceberg, and at some point, especially after being disappointed and betrayed by the globohomo milksop cuck Trump, there will be a growing White backlash that will make Trumpism seem like a mild political hiccup.

Who knows?  

Only time will tell.

Steinle and the Bullied White Dalits of America

Lessons from the schoolyard.

Read this.

Whites are a subaltern caste; actually, no, not a caste at all, untouchables.

Whites are the Dalits of America.

The appropriate and respectful response to this travesty was thisnot shameless panhandling.

Of course, what really should have happened was for the Steinle family to come out and forcefully denounce the verdict from a racial basis.  Instead, according to the AltRight.com piece, this is what happened:

Meanwhile, so far, even the parents of the dead girl are coming out against the “hate shrine” dedicated to their daughter.
I don’t know about you, but the self-loathing and cowardliness of most Whites is difficult to witness day in and day out.

One day – who knows when? – Whites in this situation will actually behave normally, as every other group would behave in like circumstances, and speak truth to power.  A family who has faced similar tragedy and similar injustice will speak up in defense of White racial interests and denounce the genocidal anti-White System we suffer under.  Until then, we must endure the spectacle of the cringing White untouchables of America groveling before their masters.  Who knows when the other shoe will drop – will the Steinle family publicly embrace and forgive the wetback who killed their daughter?  After all, that would be the “Christian” thing to do, no?  That’ll really show dem dere dirty racists their lesson!

Lesson from the schoolyard: Someone who is being bullied will continue being bullied until they fight back.  All Whites know is surrender and appeasement, and so the anti-White bullying by their privileged Colored/Jewish overlords never ends. Whites need to organize, politically and metapolitically, and start acting like a normal people, with normal and natural interests, once again.

All else is folly.

A Failure To Leverage Advantages

Inability of Whites to leverage any of the remaining economic and political influence they have.

There has been much hysteria about Negro athletes (and SJW supporters) “kneeling for the national anthem” – much sound and fury signifying nothing.  Without the willingness of the complainers to follow through on their convictions at least to the extent of not watching their precious football (America’s real religion), then who cares about all the pseudo-macho chest thumping?

More to the point – what connection is there to mainstream politics and then to the “movement” itself?

First, with respect to sports, the bottom line is this: if all the pathetic, jock-sniffing White sports fans who are upset at the “disrespect to the flag” would actually have the initiative and discipline to utilize the power of the purse, then the problem that enrages them would be very rapidly solved.  If a significantly large fraction of these fans would STOP going to the games, STOP watching the games on TV and cable, STOP buying related merchandise, STOP patronizing and talking and obsessing about football and other sports 24/7; if they would instead boycott the NFL, etc. and boycott any companies that advertise on TV during the games, then you would see some real effects, indeed. And I’m not talking about some paltry (and no doubt highly temporary) 10% decline in viewership, but a long-term decline of at least – an absolute bare minimum – of 50%, then you would see quite an effect.

Likewise, of a significant fraction of Whites would use their still considerable economic power to punish companies that promote anti-White memes and policies and use their still considerable voting numbers to reward pro-White politicians (if one could find any) and punish those (almost all) who are anti-White, then you would see real political change.  And no, blindly supporting the cuck fraud Trump does not constitute part of the solution; it is in fact part of the problem: Whites view politics like they do sports, there is “our team” and “their team,” a substitute for tribalism, in which leaders and groups are blindly followed regardless of what they do and what they represent and believe.

So, no, Whites in the end are incapable of abandoning their beloved Negro behemoths on the football field, and, no, they have no discipline to boycott anything, and, no, they can’t even restrain themselves from voting for phony cuckservatives just because they are, presumably, “the lesser of two evils.”

Likewise, White racial activists, predictably (and I did predict it), are unable to cut ties with failed “movement” leadership, even after the Hermansson fiasco.  It’s “business as usual” – move along, move along, there’s nothing to see here. If only a significant fraction of activists would stop giving handouts “(“donations”) to panhandling artists (“movement leaders”), stop patronizing their sites, stop buying their books and other paraphernalia, then the economic and social pressure would force real change in Der Movement.  But, no. Just like in sports, just like in mainstream politics, White racial activists are too lazy, feckless, conformist, hobbyist. Ignorant, and weak to actually act upon their convictions, control their behavior in order to control that of others, as take control of a “movement” hijacked by con men, grifters, the incompetent, the crazed, and those who simply want to sponge off the productivity of others while pretending to be defending the racial interests of those “others.”

What exactly does “movement leadership” have to do to be abandoned by the rank-and-file?  Make the same mistakes over and over again?  Demonstrate laughably poor judgment?  Make no progress for decades?  Fall for the whole “man on white horse” syndrome scam over and over again?  Be infiltrated, and then be humiliated by having the infiltrators participating in “vetting” or giving “movement” lectures about the dangers of infiltration?  Gambling away donations?  Using “membership dues” to engage in serial monogamy on the mountaintop?  All these things and more have happened, are happening, and will continue to happen, but, like smiling retards, the “movement” masses cheerfully continue to go along for the ride.  They’re being “taken for a ride,” indeed.” A ride to nowhere.  

So, it is all connected.  The same race that invented the modern world, landed on the moon, and was, at least in the past, fearsome warriors today cannot even be motivated to give up watching Negro behemoths collide on a football field, cannot have the discipline to refrain from re-electing a John McCain or a Lindsey Graham to the Senate over and over again, and certainly cannot refrain from being awestruck by the quota queen “rock stars” of Der Movement, said awe manifested in part by showering these incompetent and self-interested “rock stars” with the awed activists’ hard earned money.

More fundamentally: America (and all Western nations) has a System whose essential cogs are Made up of Whites, particularly White men.  If a significant portion of those cogs refuse to function, the System fails.  Likewise, if a significant portion of the “movement” rank-and-file refuse to go along with “business as usual,” then the whole rotten edifice of Der Movement comes crashing down.

But they just don’t have what it takes to do that, do they?

A race of weaklings and morons.

Revisiting Putnam

No White racial solidarity.

Let’s again consider Putnam’s oft-discussed findings about diversity eroding societal trust and repressing social engagement and investment in public goods (similar to findings by others and a topic often brought up by Salter).

Putnam not only found that diversity decreased trust between groups but within groups as well. That latter finding is somewhat counter intuitive, since one could reasonably assume that increased diversity, and the consequent increased distrust between groups, would strengthen a tribal “us against them” mentality and therefore increase trust within groups. But the opposite occurred, at least with those examples Putnam studied. 

How can we interpret the counter intuitive finding that diversity erodes trust and societal cohesion within groups as well as between groups?  This depends on whether this “within group” problem applies to all groups, or only to Whites.  Perhaps those more familiar with the nuances of Putnam’s work – which I read some time ago and have no interest in revisiting as Putnam is a disgusting excuse for an academic who hid his findings for years and only published it with an accompanying screed promoting social engineering to grease the wheels of White dispossession (*) and my hypothesis here will require more data in any case for a fair evaluation – know more of this.

My hypothesis is as follows. 

If within group trust is eroded by diversity for all groups, then this phenomenon reflects a general human (or should I say “hominid”) trend to withdraw and “hunker down” when faced with diversity,

If the effect is restricted to Whites (which I believe will be the case if a careful quantitative study is done), then this is a strictly White mental phenomenon.  And how does this happen?  The hypothesis suggest the following.

One could speculate various mechanisms if this was the case, but consider – a la Ignatiev’s “Race Traitor” paradigm – that Whites are the only group in which large numbers of the group – including a majority of influential elites – act overtly against group interests.  Thus, there is no racial solidarity among Whites, no one you can racially trust unless you really know them – hence, when faced with diversity, Whites will mistrust other Whites because  – given the omega cuckiness of many Whites – one can never be sure whether a given White is “on our side” or “on their side.”  In a homogeneous White community this isn’t so much of a problem (of course political disagreements – including whether or not to import diversity – can precipitate such mistrust, but even so, in a homogeneous community such conflicts would be muted).  However, in the presence of diversity, Whites must tread carefully.  Is your White coworker someone you can trust to share your disgust over multiculturalism, or will they “report you to HR” because of your “bigotry?”

On the other hand, non-Whites (including Jews) can reliably depend on their co-ethnics showing ethic/racial solidarity, and siding with them against “the other” (and particularly against Whites). For Whites, a given fellow White is just as likely to be a Universalist cuck as they are to be someone sharing your beliefs.  

Thus, diversity erodes within group trust among Whites (and likely only among Whites) because Whites are ideologically split on this race-diversity issue, and many Whites are SJW “altruistic punishers, so that in diverse environments fellow Whites may pose a threat since they would identify with “the other side.”

Ignatiev would be proud.

*Salter rightly claimed in On Genetic Interests that for a majority being replaced, the only thing worse than a multiculturalism that does not work is one that does work, since the workable multiculturalism will make race replacement more agreeable to those being replaced, while the pain of a failed multiculturalism may wake the majority up to prevent their dispossession.  Putnam is clearly on the side of those who want multiculturalism to succeed.

June 5: Spencer’s Video and an Open Call

An open call.

Here is an excellent, and realistic, Spencer video on the latest London terrorist attack. Here, Spencer hits some notes consistent with points I’ve made over the years: objectively worthless (my words, not his) Whites will continue to grovel and appease regardless of the provocations, worse is not better because there is apparently no limit in sight to the level of abuse Whites are willing to take, and that change will require a fundamental alteration in White thinking patterns so activists need to concentrate on basic principles and not overreact to single incidents like this one.

Spencer once again proves his potential as a pro-White leader.

Now, you know, I’m not of the Alt Right  and I (strongly) dislike the brand and its pretensions to legitimate “movement” hegemony.  I could in theory adopt an attitude of schadenfreude about all the divisive, internal Alt Right feuds going on, and if I was really the “crazy” and “bitter” lunatic the Alt Righters claim I am, that would indeed be my attitude.

However, I realize that – until the time comes that the Alt Right fad burns itself out – the Alt Right does have predominance (illegitimate hegemony) in racial activism today, particularly in America but growing in Western Europe as well. This predominance means that missteps of the Alt Right can harm racial nationalism as a whole, and I would like the damage minimized.  That is, we need “damage control” until such time that activists come to their senses (there’s a first time for everything) and realize there’s more to racial nationalism than Millennials, juvenile jackassery, generally superficial analyses, Trump worship, and screaming about Pepe and Kek.

In that frame of mind, I make an open call, I call upon both Spencer and Johnson to put their differences aside, exhibit genuine leadership for the greater good, and, at the very least, stop the attacks against each other and their allies.

Things change in Der Movement.  Not so long ago, Johnson was on good relations with Spencer and with Friberg.  Now, he’s on good relations with Hunter Wallace, a change from the past.  Spencer has refrained from criticizing Johnson until the recent Friberg incident.

Yes, I know, nationalist leaders of the past have had their feuds and falling outs.  Hitler and Rohm, Codreanu and Cuza, etc. But, guys, you are not at their level, your differences do not rise to the level of those historical breaks, and petty feuds mostly about personality and access to money aren’t helping any of us.

Well Then, Brexit is Sure Working Out Well!

Dat dere ethnonationalism working wonders!

Well, you see, as long as dem dere Poles are kept out of the UK, everything will be A-OK!

Now we can wait for the other shoe to drop: marches in London, full of White natives, in support of more Islamic immigration, in support of their “Muslim community,” in support of “diversity” and “multiculturalism,” and against “bigotry and hatred.”

No worries though!  All you need are some more Silker comments posted at AltRight.com accompanied by pictures of female (of course) anime figures standing proudly alongside the British flag. After all, the essence of being “British” is the Union Jack, don’t you know.