Category: objective worthlessness of the White race

Revisiting Putnam

No White racial solidarity.

Let’s again consider Putnam’s oft-discussed findings about diversity eroding societal trust and repressing social engagement and investment in public goods (similar to findings by others and a topic often brought up by Salter).

Putnam not only found that diversity decreased trust between groups but within groups as well. That latter finding is somewhat counter intuitive, since one could reasonably assume that increased diversity, and the consequent increased distrust between groups, would strengthen a tribal “us against them” mentality and therefore increase trust within groups. But the opposite occurred, at least with those examples Putnam studied. 

How can we interpret the counter intuitive finding that diversity erodes trust and societal cohesion within groups as well as between groups?  This depends on whether this “within group” problem applies to all groups, or only to Whites.  Perhaps those more familiar with the nuances of Putnam’s work – which I read some time ago and have no interest in revisiting as Putnam is a disgusting excuse for an academic who hid his findings for years and only published it with an accompanying screed promoting social engineering to grease the wheels of White dispossession (*) and my hypothesis here will require more data in any case for a fair evaluation – know more of this.

My hypothesis is as follows. 

If within group trust is eroded by diversity for all groups, then this phenomenon reflects a general human (or should I say “hominid”) trend to withdraw and “hunker down” when faced with diversity,

If the effect is restricted to Whites (which I believe will be the case if a careful quantitative study is done), then this is a strictly White mental phenomenon.  And how does this happen?  The hypothesis suggest the following.

One could speculate various mechanisms if this was the case, but consider – a la Ignatiev’s “Race Traitor” paradigm – that Whites are the only group in which large numbers of the group – including a majority of influential elites – act overtly against group interests.  Thus, there is no racial solidarity among Whites, no one you can racially trust unless you really know them – hence, when faced with diversity, Whites will mistrust other Whites because  – given the omega cuckiness of many Whites – one can never be sure whether a given White is “on our side” or “on their side.”  In a homogeneous White community this isn’t so much of a problem (of course political disagreements – including whether or not to import diversity – can precipitate such mistrust, but even so, in a homogeneous community such conflicts would be muted).  However, in the presence of diversity, Whites must tread carefully.  Is your White coworker someone you can trust to share your disgust over multiculturalism, or will they “report you to HR” because of your “bigotry?”

On the other hand, non-Whites (including Jews) can reliably depend on their co-ethnics showing ethic/racial solidarity, and siding with them against “the other” (and particularly against Whites). For Whites, a given fellow White is just as likely to be a Universalist cuck as they are to be someone sharing your beliefs.  

Thus, diversity erodes within group trust among Whites (and likely only among Whites) because Whites are ideologically split on this race-diversity issue, and many Whites are SJW “altruistic punishers, so that in diverse environments fellow Whites may pose a threat since they would identify with “the other side.”

Ignatiev would be proud.

*Salter rightly claimed in On Genetic Interests that for a majority being replaced, the only thing worse than a multiculturalism that does not work is one that does work, since the workable multiculturalism will make race replacement more agreeable to those being replaced, while the pain of a failed multiculturalism may wake the majority up to prevent their dispossession.  Putnam is clearly on the side of those who want multiculturalism to succeed.

Advertisements

June 5: Spencer’s Video and an Open Call

An open call.

Here is an excellent, and realistic, Spencer video on the latest London terrorist attack. Here, Spencer hits some notes consistent with points I’ve made over the years: objectively worthless (my words, not his) Whites will continue to grovel and appease regardless of the provocations, worse is not better because there is apparently no limit in sight to the level of abuse Whites are willing to take, and that change will require a fundamental alteration in White thinking patterns so activists need to concentrate on basic principles and not overreact to single incidents like this one.

Spencer once again proves his potential as a pro-White leader.

Now, you know, I’m not of the Alt Right  and I (strongly) dislike the brand and its pretensions to legitimate “movement” hegemony.  I could in theory adopt an attitude of schadenfreude about all the divisive, internal Alt Right feuds going on, and if I was really the “crazy” and “bitter” lunatic the Alt Righters claim I am, that would indeed be my attitude.

However, I realize that – until the time comes that the Alt Right fad burns itself out – the Alt Right does have predominance (illegitimate hegemony) in racial activism today, particularly in America but growing in Western Europe as well. This predominance means that missteps of the Alt Right can harm racial nationalism as a whole, and I would like the damage minimized.  That is, we need “damage control” until such time that activists come to their senses (there’s a first time for everything) and realize there’s more to racial nationalism than Millennials, juvenile jackassery, generally superficial analyses, Trump worship, and screaming about Pepe and Kek.

In that frame of mind, I make an open call, I call upon both Spencer and Johnson to put their differences aside, exhibit genuine leadership for the greater good, and, at the very least, stop the attacks against each other and their allies.

Things change in Der Movement.  Not so long ago, Johnson was on good relations with Spencer and with Friberg.  Now, he’s on good relations with Hunter Wallace, a change from the past.  Spencer has refrained from criticizing Johnson until the recent Friberg incident.

Yes, I know, nationalist leaders of the past have had their feuds and falling outs.  Hitler and Rohm, Codreanu and Cuza, etc. But, guys, you are not at their level, your differences do not rise to the level of those historical breaks, and petty feuds mostly about personality and access to money aren’t helping any of us.

Well Then, Brexit is Sure Working Out Well!

Dat dere ethnonationalism working wonders!

Well, you see, as long as dem dere Poles are kept out of the UK, everything will be A-OK!

Now we can wait for the other shoe to drop: marches in London, full of White natives, in support of more Islamic immigration, in support of their “Muslim community,” in support of “diversity” and “multiculturalism,” and against “bigotry and hatred.”

No worries though!  All you need are some more Silker comments posted at AltRight.com accompanied by pictures of female (of course) anime figures standing proudly alongside the British flag. After all, the essence of being “British” is the Union Jack, don’t you know.

Two Items, 1/7/17

Two items.

Another excellent Hood article, summarizing the world gone mad we find ourselves in.

Why Christianity must be mercilessly destroyed.  This religion of beta race cucks (shall we rename it Cuckinsanity?), a religion of weaklings and losers, a religion of lazy free-riders who need to import those aliens they want to “mission to” (and how well is that coming along, idiots?) – this backwards desert religion foisted upon us by hook-nosed levantine migrants (but with wonderfully high IQs! – but I guess those high IQs came later) – can we be rid of this Culture Distortion burden on us?

And for those nitwits who want to distinguish today’s weakling Cuckinsanity from “Traditional Christianity” I note the following.  Even at the height of “muscular Traditional Christianity defending Europe” the idea, ultimately, was conversion and assimilation.  The problem the Crusaders had with Muslims was simply their religion.  If the NECs had converted – presto! – problem gone. Or are the mendacious pro-Christian brigade going to lie to us and tell us that Christian resistance to the Moors and Saracens and Turks was “racial?”  It was not.  The only reason why conversion and assimilation failed in that instance is that Muslims have a strong faith and they stick with their beliefs, they want to convert us, they don’t want to be converted by us (which is why all the current “Christian missioning” is a pathetic joke).

Crush the infamy!

More White Worthlessness

The maladaptive race.

Cuck Austria.

Strom is correct that we are not going to vote ourselves out of this mess. He is wrong, however, that the solution si to buy our way out with the discredited currency of Pierce-ism.

What we need is clear-head realism coupled to a sane, fact-based, and racially progressive memetic product.  In other words: a New Movement.

The High Road and the Low Road

A look from above and from below.

Let’s consider two items.  First, the second part of Strom’s fine essay on “the arrow of time,” and second the insanely hysterical reaction to some mild joking sexual banter from lowbrow Presidential candidate Donald J. “Touchback Amnesty” Trump.

While I disagree with Strom on some issues (the Pierce legacy being foremost among them) and was disappointed to learn of Strom’s involvement in the Who We Are fiasco (although he has claimed the publicly distributed version is not the final edited one – what? – is all of Pierce’s extreme Nordicism going to be censored out?), it seems that he and I are in accord on certain basic fundamentals.  I agree on the importance of elite racialists taking a long-term – in this case VERY long-term – view, a cosmic view so to speak, of the White race and its role in the universe.  The relationship of Life – and to my mind the primacy of Information, particularly Genetic Information – in the long struggle with entropy – is something I’ve also long thought about. These are the High Road issues, the Top-to-Bottom perspective, and Strom should be commended for discussing it.

But then there is the Low Road, the Bottom-to-Top perspective, all the practical, getting-your-hands-dirty, political and meta-political work required for White racial survival in its current crisis, a survival that needs to occur or all speculations about entropy and a long-term universal future become meaningless.

Thus, the current electoral campaign needs to be considered, not because the vulgar buffoon Trump, a negro-loving race cuck, is of importance in and of himself, but because of the possibilities inherent in leveraging the Trump phenomenon for White racial advantage in the dark days to come.

So, we need to get off of the cosmic pedestal and get down into the muck, into the disgusting sewer morass, into the rancid filth, of American politics, of American society, and of Trump’s own foibles and problems.

Now, Trump is indeed a vulgar buffoon, but in this case he really did not do anything wrong. What is this?  Eleven years ago (eleven!) he made some mild joking comments, something that one would expect from a crude wealthy man who has had significant sexual success with attractive women. So what?  Where’s the problem?  Even by the low standards of contemporary American society, by the low standards of American politics, this is a non-issue.  For godssakes, Bill Clinton committed multiple acts of adulterous sodomy with a young (Jewess) intern in the White House as President, but everyone is getting hysterically worked up over brief comments made by a Presidential candidate more than a decade ago. 

The insanely hysterical reaction of the Republican Establishment is the worst of all – is this all to be believed?  Grown men – politicians – thinking this a serious issue?  Seriously demanding that the Republican nominee – the choice of the GOP electorate – should drop out a month before the election? Whining like the worst white knighting pathetic beta cucks because a man treats women like the gold-digging sluts that they are?  The American nation and the American people are going straight down the toilet and middle-aged male politicians are reacting like a screeching horde of offended elderly church ladies with their panties in a bunch.  I also note for the record that the screeching horde not only includes Trump’s own VP candidate, the vulpine turd Pence, but also Trump’s wife (Yeah…some “alpha male” he is.  Sleeping on the couch tonight, Donny Cuck?).

Let’s call it like it is: The Republican Establishment has reacted to Trump by essentially becoming an integral part of the Clinton campaign.  The GOP base should never forget this. For decades, the Establishment put forth cuckservative milksop candidates and pontificated to the base that they had to support such undesirable candidates because “we need to stand together to defeat the liberal Democrat.”  Now that the shoe is on the other foot, and the base chose the candidate they wanted, the same Establishment has been rushing headlong into the arms of the liberal Democrat, and they were doing so before these laughable “revelations.”

Maybe Strom is wrong then?  A race that can produce trash like that, an objectively worthless race that has proven itself maladaptively unfit in a myriad of ways over the last half-century, can this loser race actually be the vanguard of Life in the eternal struggle against entropy?

One wonders if a tribe of jungle pygmies wouldn’t be a better choice.

Suffer the Little Children

Whites take abuse unlimited.

Read this.

The 2014 outbreak of AFM occurred at the same time as a far larger outbreak of enterovirus D68 across the United States. The vast majority of patients infected with the virus developed only a respiratory illness. Some physicians were convinced that EV-D68 was the cause, not only because both outbreaks occurred at the same time but also because of a study that identified a particular strain of EV-D68 in the airways of children with AFM.


It is very plausible that this virus entered the USA via immigration, including from “unaccompanied Central American children” as well as our usual flood from Mexico and assorted other flotsam and jetsam.
Why do Whites tolerate this? Even if there is only a remote possibility this is from immigration that should be sufficient to stir outrage and reaction in any sane and healthy people. I’m not saying Whites need to riot and rampage in an orgy of bloody destruction – which is what EVERY other people would do if subjected to a fraction of what Whites endure – but what about politics? Even a Negro-loving ultra race cuck like Trump, who is at least a mild immigration restrictionist, cannot get a large majority of the White vote.
Whites are maladaptively unfit; they are not only inferior, but subhumanly inferior.