Category: objective worthlessness of the White race

Steinle and the Bullied White Dalits of America

Lessons from the schoolyard.

Read this.

Whites are a subaltern caste; actually, no, not a caste at all, untouchables.

Whites are the Dalits of America.

The appropriate and respectful response to this travesty was thisnot shameless panhandling.

Of course, what really should have happened was for the Steinle family to come out and forcefully denounce the verdict from a racial basis.  Instead, according to the AltRight.com piece, this is what happened:

Meanwhile, so far, even the parents of the dead girl are coming out against the “hate shrine” dedicated to their daughter.
I don’t know about you, but the self-loathing and cowardliness of most Whites is difficult to witness day in and day out.

One day – who knows when? – Whites in this situation will actually behave normally, as every other group would behave in like circumstances, and speak truth to power.  A family who has faced similar tragedy and similar injustice will speak up in defense of White racial interests and denounce the genocidal anti-White System we suffer under.  Until then, we must endure the spectacle of the cringing White untouchables of America groveling before their masters.  Who knows when the other shoe will drop – will the Steinle family publicly embrace and forgive the wetback who killed their daughter?  After all, that would be the “Christian” thing to do, no?  That’ll really show dem dere dirty racists their lesson!

Lesson from the schoolyard: Someone who is being bullied will continue being bullied until they fight back.  All Whites know is surrender and appeasement, and so the anti-White bullying by their privileged Colored/Jewish overlords never ends. Whites need to organize, politically and metapolitically, and start acting like a normal people, with normal and natural interests, once again.

All else is folly.

Advertisements

A Failure To Leverage Advantages

Inability of Whites to leverage any of the remaining economic and political influence they have.

There has been much hysteria about Negro athletes (and SJW supporters) “kneeling for the national anthem” – much sound and fury signifying nothing.  Without the willingness of the complainers to follow through on their convictions at least to the extent of not watching their precious football (America’s real religion), then who cares about all the pseudo-macho chest thumping?

More to the point – what connection is there to mainstream politics and then to the “movement” itself?

First, with respect to sports, the bottom line is this: if all the pathetic, jock-sniffing White sports fans who are upset at the “disrespect to the flag” would actually have the initiative and discipline to utilize the power of the purse, then the problem that enrages them would be very rapidly solved.  If a significantly large fraction of these fans would STOP going to the games, STOP watching the games on TV and cable, STOP buying related merchandise, STOP patronizing and talking and obsessing about football and other sports 24/7; if they would instead boycott the NFL, etc. and boycott any companies that advertise on TV during the games, then you would see some real effects, indeed. And I’m not talking about some paltry (and no doubt highly temporary) 10% decline in viewership, but a long-term decline of at least – an absolute bare minimum – of 50%, then you would see quite an effect.

Likewise, of a significant fraction of Whites would use their still considerable economic power to punish companies that promote anti-White memes and policies and use their still considerable voting numbers to reward pro-White politicians (if one could find any) and punish those (almost all) who are anti-White, then you would see real political change.  And no, blindly supporting the cuck fraud Trump does not constitute part of the solution; it is in fact part of the problem: Whites view politics like they do sports, there is “our team” and “their team,” a substitute for tribalism, in which leaders and groups are blindly followed regardless of what they do and what they represent and believe.

So, no, Whites in the end are incapable of abandoning their beloved Negro behemoths on the football field, and, no, they have no discipline to boycott anything, and, no, they can’t even restrain themselves from voting for phony cuckservatives just because they are, presumably, “the lesser of two evils.”

Likewise, White racial activists, predictably (and I did predict it), are unable to cut ties with failed “movement” leadership, even after the Hermansson fiasco.  It’s “business as usual” – move along, move along, there’s nothing to see here. If only a significant fraction of activists would stop giving handouts “(“donations”) to panhandling artists (“movement leaders”), stop patronizing their sites, stop buying their books and other paraphernalia, then the economic and social pressure would force real change in Der Movement.  But, no. Just like in sports, just like in mainstream politics, White racial activists are too lazy, feckless, conformist, hobbyist. Ignorant, and weak to actually act upon their convictions, control their behavior in order to control that of others, as take control of a “movement” hijacked by con men, grifters, the incompetent, the crazed, and those who simply want to sponge off the productivity of others while pretending to be defending the racial interests of those “others.”

What exactly does “movement leadership” have to do to be abandoned by the rank-and-file?  Make the same mistakes over and over again?  Demonstrate laughably poor judgment?  Make no progress for decades?  Fall for the whole “man on white horse” syndrome scam over and over again?  Be infiltrated, and then be humiliated by having the infiltrators participating in “vetting” or giving “movement” lectures about the dangers of infiltration?  Gambling away donations?  Using “membership dues” to engage in serial monogamy on the mountaintop?  All these things and more have happened, are happening, and will continue to happen, but, like smiling retards, the “movement” masses cheerfully continue to go along for the ride.  They’re being “taken for a ride,” indeed.” A ride to nowhere.  

So, it is all connected.  The same race that invented the modern world, landed on the moon, and was, at least in the past, fearsome warriors today cannot even be motivated to give up watching Negro behemoths collide on a football field, cannot have the discipline to refrain from re-electing a John McCain or a Lindsey Graham to the Senate over and over again, and certainly cannot refrain from being awestruck by the quota queen “rock stars” of Der Movement, said awe manifested in part by showering these incompetent and self-interested “rock stars” with the awed activists’ hard earned money.

More fundamentally: America (and all Western nations) has a System whose essential cogs are Made up of Whites, particularly White men.  If a significant portion of those cogs refuse to function, the System fails.  Likewise, if a significant portion of the “movement” rank-and-file refuse to go along with “business as usual,” then the whole rotten edifice of Der Movement comes crashing down.

But they just don’t have what it takes to do that, do they?

A race of weaklings and morons.

Revisiting Putnam

No White racial solidarity.

Let’s again consider Putnam’s oft-discussed findings about diversity eroding societal trust and repressing social engagement and investment in public goods (similar to findings by others and a topic often brought up by Salter).

Putnam not only found that diversity decreased trust between groups but within groups as well. That latter finding is somewhat counter intuitive, since one could reasonably assume that increased diversity, and the consequent increased distrust between groups, would strengthen a tribal “us against them” mentality and therefore increase trust within groups. But the opposite occurred, at least with those examples Putnam studied. 

How can we interpret the counter intuitive finding that diversity erodes trust and societal cohesion within groups as well as between groups?  This depends on whether this “within group” problem applies to all groups, or only to Whites.  Perhaps those more familiar with the nuances of Putnam’s work – which I read some time ago and have no interest in revisiting as Putnam is a disgusting excuse for an academic who hid his findings for years and only published it with an accompanying screed promoting social engineering to grease the wheels of White dispossession (*) and my hypothesis here will require more data in any case for a fair evaluation – know more of this.

My hypothesis is as follows. 

If within group trust is eroded by diversity for all groups, then this phenomenon reflects a general human (or should I say “hominid”) trend to withdraw and “hunker down” when faced with diversity,

If the effect is restricted to Whites (which I believe will be the case if a careful quantitative study is done), then this is a strictly White mental phenomenon.  And how does this happen?  The hypothesis suggest the following.

One could speculate various mechanisms if this was the case, but consider – a la Ignatiev’s “Race Traitor” paradigm – that Whites are the only group in which large numbers of the group – including a majority of influential elites – act overtly against group interests.  Thus, there is no racial solidarity among Whites, no one you can racially trust unless you really know them – hence, when faced with diversity, Whites will mistrust other Whites because  – given the omega cuckiness of many Whites – one can never be sure whether a given White is “on our side” or “on their side.”  In a homogeneous White community this isn’t so much of a problem (of course political disagreements – including whether or not to import diversity – can precipitate such mistrust, but even so, in a homogeneous community such conflicts would be muted).  However, in the presence of diversity, Whites must tread carefully.  Is your White coworker someone you can trust to share your disgust over multiculturalism, or will they “report you to HR” because of your “bigotry?”

On the other hand, non-Whites (including Jews) can reliably depend on their co-ethnics showing ethic/racial solidarity, and siding with them against “the other” (and particularly against Whites). For Whites, a given fellow White is just as likely to be a Universalist cuck as they are to be someone sharing your beliefs.  

Thus, diversity erodes within group trust among Whites (and likely only among Whites) because Whites are ideologically split on this race-diversity issue, and many Whites are SJW “altruistic punishers, so that in diverse environments fellow Whites may pose a threat since they would identify with “the other side.”

Ignatiev would be proud.

*Salter rightly claimed in On Genetic Interests that for a majority being replaced, the only thing worse than a multiculturalism that does not work is one that does work, since the workable multiculturalism will make race replacement more agreeable to those being replaced, while the pain of a failed multiculturalism may wake the majority up to prevent their dispossession.  Putnam is clearly on the side of those who want multiculturalism to succeed.

June 5: Spencer’s Video and an Open Call

An open call.

Here is an excellent, and realistic, Spencer video on the latest London terrorist attack. Here, Spencer hits some notes consistent with points I’ve made over the years: objectively worthless (my words, not his) Whites will continue to grovel and appease regardless of the provocations, worse is not better because there is apparently no limit in sight to the level of abuse Whites are willing to take, and that change will require a fundamental alteration in White thinking patterns so activists need to concentrate on basic principles and not overreact to single incidents like this one.

Spencer once again proves his potential as a pro-White leader.

Now, you know, I’m not of the Alt Right  and I (strongly) dislike the brand and its pretensions to legitimate “movement” hegemony.  I could in theory adopt an attitude of schadenfreude about all the divisive, internal Alt Right feuds going on, and if I was really the “crazy” and “bitter” lunatic the Alt Righters claim I am, that would indeed be my attitude.

However, I realize that – until the time comes that the Alt Right fad burns itself out – the Alt Right does have predominance (illegitimate hegemony) in racial activism today, particularly in America but growing in Western Europe as well. This predominance means that missteps of the Alt Right can harm racial nationalism as a whole, and I would like the damage minimized.  That is, we need “damage control” until such time that activists come to their senses (there’s a first time for everything) and realize there’s more to racial nationalism than Millennials, juvenile jackassery, generally superficial analyses, Trump worship, and screaming about Pepe and Kek.

In that frame of mind, I make an open call, I call upon both Spencer and Johnson to put their differences aside, exhibit genuine leadership for the greater good, and, at the very least, stop the attacks against each other and their allies.

Things change in Der Movement.  Not so long ago, Johnson was on good relations with Spencer and with Friberg.  Now, he’s on good relations with Hunter Wallace, a change from the past.  Spencer has refrained from criticizing Johnson until the recent Friberg incident.

Yes, I know, nationalist leaders of the past have had their feuds and falling outs.  Hitler and Rohm, Codreanu and Cuza, etc. But, guys, you are not at their level, your differences do not rise to the level of those historical breaks, and petty feuds mostly about personality and access to money aren’t helping any of us.

Well Then, Brexit is Sure Working Out Well!

Dat dere ethnonationalism working wonders!

Well, you see, as long as dem dere Poles are kept out of the UK, everything will be A-OK!

Now we can wait for the other shoe to drop: marches in London, full of White natives, in support of more Islamic immigration, in support of their “Muslim community,” in support of “diversity” and “multiculturalism,” and against “bigotry and hatred.”

No worries though!  All you need are some more Silker comments posted at AltRight.com accompanied by pictures of female (of course) anime figures standing proudly alongside the British flag. After all, the essence of being “British” is the Union Jack, don’t you know.

Two Items, 1/7/17

Two items.

Another excellent Hood article, summarizing the world gone mad we find ourselves in.

Why Christianity must be mercilessly destroyed.  This religion of beta race cucks (shall we rename it Cuckinsanity?), a religion of weaklings and losers, a religion of lazy free-riders who need to import those aliens they want to “mission to” (and how well is that coming along, idiots?) – this backwards desert religion foisted upon us by hook-nosed levantine migrants (but with wonderfully high IQs! – but I guess those high IQs came later) – can we be rid of this Culture Distortion burden on us?

And for those nitwits who want to distinguish today’s weakling Cuckinsanity from “Traditional Christianity” I note the following.  Even at the height of “muscular Traditional Christianity defending Europe” the idea, ultimately, was conversion and assimilation.  The problem the Crusaders had with Muslims was simply their religion.  If the NECs had converted – presto! – problem gone. Or are the mendacious pro-Christian brigade going to lie to us and tell us that Christian resistance to the Moors and Saracens and Turks was “racial?”  It was not.  The only reason why conversion and assimilation failed in that instance is that Muslims have a strong faith and they stick with their beliefs, they want to convert us, they don’t want to be converted by us (which is why all the current “Christian missioning” is a pathetic joke).

Crush the infamy!

More White Worthlessness

The maladaptive race.

Cuck Austria.

Strom is correct that we are not going to vote ourselves out of this mess. He is wrong, however, that the solution si to buy our way out with the discredited currency of Pierce-ism.

What we need is clear-head realism coupled to a sane, fact-based, and racially progressive memetic product.  In other words: a New Movement.