In der news.
In preparing for possible legal and government regulation action against certain left-leaning institutions, I came across one vulnerability that may be useful. Interestingly, certain Far Right entities are probably even more vulnerable to the same approach. I obviously will not discuss what it is here – I’m not in the business of assisting the Left nor of warning the Quota Queens. I’ll simply continue to plan ahead for possible legal action against the aforementioned leftist entities (if necessary).
But I will say that this all confirms to my mind the ineptness and reckless stupidity of the Quota Queens, and the manifest inferiority of WN 2.0 (WN 1.0, insofar as I know, didn’t make the same error). It also underscores to an even greater extent how moronic and inefficient the Left is – for all their massive resources they leave low hanging fruit unplucked. Or is it that they are afraid that the same approach can be leveraged against them? Perhaps that is it. But given the anarcho-tyranny of a biased legal and government system, do they really need to worry about it? Will the same consideration of System protection of the Left (i.e., protection of itself) hamper my own anti-leftist efforts in this regard? On the other hand, for some entities, the thing they fear most of all is bad publicity. So, in that sense, the Left has far more to lose (given that the Right is already always portrayed badly in any case) unless the Left’s control of the media results in their bad publicity being squashed. But in today’s era of the Internet and social media, I’m not sure that even the Left can put a lid on bad publicity.
In the short storyNever Meet Again by science fiction writer Algis Budrys, a German scientist lives in a late 1950s alternative reality in which the Axis won the war and Germany is a prosperous and happy National Socialist regime. The scientist is himself personally unhappy because he blames the Nazis for the death of his wife. So he designs a device that allows him to travel to an alternative reality that he thinks will be better – one in which Germany lost. So, he does so – and ends up in a real dystopia, our reality, in which he turns up in Soviet-controlled dark and dreary late 1950s East Berlin. All around is squalor and miserable people. There, he meets that reality’s version of his wife, still alive, overjoyed to see him, since he himself was killed by an American bombing in this reality. At which point, the wife, upon learning what he had done, turns him over to the Soviet authorities who want him to rebuild his machine to be used as an anti-American weapon. Budrys was, in the word of the Alt Right: “based.”
Then we have Tau Zero by Poul Anderson, who was of Scandinavian descent, a book which pictures a future Earth ruled by (an ethnically homogeneous and very Nordic) Sweden. That book displaces porn as onanistic material for Durocher. Put that book down Durocher, lest you get a priapism.
The Slavic soul.
A perfect example of why Counter-Currents is despicably dishonest – a commentator there writes:
I don’t see eye to eye with Nicholas R. Jeelvy on a lot of things, but he hit it out of the park with this analysis. “Racist Liberal” only came about as a term of insult in March 2020 in response to White Nationalists who were opposed to the COVID-19 shutdown. Basically, COVID exposed a schism between WN’s who support freedom and individualism vs. WN’s who come from a Leftist or even Communist background and thus are highly in favor of collective measures, which they justify under the guise that they are “protecting society.” Hunter Wallace, Richard Spencer, Matt Parrott, Keith Woods, Eric Striker, Marcus Cicero of Daily Stormer fame, and numerous Twitter accounts – especially the ones using fake Black People names – are all in favor of collectivism and “What’s Good For Society” over individual liberty for White men and White women. The term “Racist Liberal” was invented by these people.
Excuse me, but the “collectivism and ‘What’s Good For Society’ over individual liberty for White men and White women” mindset this commentator decries is not only exhibited by “Hunter Wallace, Richard Spencer, Matt Parrott, Keith Woods, Eric Striker, Marcus Cicero of Daily Stormer fame” BUT ALSO BY GREG JOHNSON HIMSELF. And does the “great man” come in to reply to this comment and defend his covid-19 views? Of course not. Later in the thread he responds to someone asserting that the sneering Frenchie poodle “scientist” won the covid-19 debate because Johnson’s ego is bruised by that, but he doesn’t directly defend his collectivist pro-lockdown views when those are ascribed to a “Leftist or even Communist background.”
Johnson won’t do it, but I will, since I’ve been more on the covid-19 is a serious threat side as opposed to the flubro side. Talking about “Leftist or even Communist” is simply ad hominem. Collectivist action could be fascist, national socialist, Far Right, what have you. The good old “freedom and apple pie” USA always had no problem with collective action in wartime; the military draft being a prime example. Indeed, sometimes society requires protecting, and that usually entails collective action and investment in common social goods, not “sturdy individualism.” “Freedom and individualism” requires collective action for protection, as others with less adherence to those principles will use collective action to strip those from you. Better collective action voluntarily by Whites, in a White manner, sacrificing some “freedom and individualism” to save the remainder, than to have alien outsiders use collective action to strip the White man of everything. And, as I’ve said before, and I’ll say it again, the whole covid-19 lockdown issue is a strange “hill to die on” for the rah-rah individualists. Maybe being so militant would have served better as regards forced racial integration, affirmative action, mass immigration, etc. But I suppose defying White doctors and scientists is easier than defying Colored militants and their Jewish controllers, eh?
Introducing the Costello Counter-Currents diet plan.
This is TOO:
Let’s look at the term aryan used by hitler the nazis and also the roman salute. The iranians are these days some of the most racially mixed peoples, on averege 15% east indain also part arab and so on. Hence the old aryans are dead.
The term “Aryan” is moronic. The “Aryans” were never what the fetishists though they were.
As for the roman salute, most italians are mixed with arabsa and north africans these days, partially as an effect of the roman empire.
Sallis’ Law in action again. Remarkable that after the Roman genetics study – mysteriously completely ignored by Der Movement – that we continue to have such comments, but there you go. What about East Asian/Siberian admixture in Northern Europe? Move on, move on, there’s nothing to see there – and it’s of great benefit to all humanity, and don’t you forget it!
The swastika, is mainly used in india, where whites tried to stay separate but all mixed with non whites to some degree, the cast system probably reflects an attempt at keeping the mixture lover for parts of the population.
The cast system? By the way, when were there “Whites” in India, in the sense of the word meaning Europeans? The British control to be sure, but before that? India was never “White” to begin with – “beige” perhaps?
Gene tests of hitlers relatives has shown mixture with berbs, north africans (could be berbs and arabs occupied spain, then spain occupied The Netherlands that is a neighbour country to germany which is bordering austria)…
First, that’s the NRY. Second, amusingly, we note here that any potential admixture in Hitler is blamed on…Spain. But of course. And what is a “berb?” The same as a “blurb?”
Hence all the choices of symbols by the nazis hevily represents racemixing. The ideology also led to 40 million people dying, most of them whites, 8 million of them german.
The Nazis supported race-mixing! QED! But, hey, at least the Iranians, Italians, Indians, Nazis, and Hitler knew basic spelling, which is more than what can be said about this minor Herrenvolk nobility.
This is correct.
Hey now! It’s time to discuss the racial admixture of the “dago” Frank Rizzo and his “big meatballs.”
Standing six-foot-two and built like a rhinoceros, Frank Rizzo has been called “larger than life”…
Are you sure that’s not “five-foot-two? After all, we don’t want the moldering corpse of Humphrey Ireland to get confused or anything.