Category: Old Movement

8/12/19 News

News.

Does anyone see a common thread in these stories?  The Ames story alone would fit in well with The Good Shepherd, but not in the manner in which Der Movement obsesses over that movie – or, shall we say, one particular scene in that movie.

Der Movement, Der Movement, Der Movement marches on.

And the other shoe drops.

So much winning!

The current state of the “movement” – what an unmitigated disaster.  On the morning of Nov. 9, 2016, there were virtually unlimited opportunities for the “movement.”  There was enormous potential and it was all squandered, everything has been ruined – ruined by the Type I retards who make up the bulk of the rank-and-file and ruined even more by their affirmative action leadership, pathetic losers and professional failures whose only qualification for “movement leadership” is their ethnic background. 

And with all the serious issues as stake, “movement” “activists” are busy concentrating on what they perceive as crucially important matters – such as attempting to distort archaeogenetics findings even before they are published.

Reading online genetics forums, it seems like all my predictions about Der Movement’s reactions to the forthcoming Rome paper are coming true even before it is published.  The fetishists are foaming at the mouth, retconning their dogma with a vengeance.

Interestingly, many of these fetishists are Poles, who apparently believe that they’ll be accepted by NW Euros if they parrot then dogma even more vehemently than NW Euros do.  Fat chance of that.

Thus, the fetishists are pretending that the dogma was never that the Ancient Greeks and Romans (and Egyptians!) were Nordic. Oh no, perish the thought, that’s all down the memory hole.

Now, it’s that the Northern Italian-like real Romans were replaced (genocide!) by greasy Sicilian-like MENA immigrants.  And, of course, they say that assaying Ancient Rome is no different from assaying New York City – unless of course the findings were compatible with the original dogma and then they’d be crowing about the results and how “representative” they were.

The lesson here is that no matter what the findings of archaeogenetics, the fetishists will NEVER admit to being wrong. If a study demonstrated that King Leonidas was akin to a Nigerian, the fetishists would proclaim “Arthur Kemp was right!” – after all, in this scenario, Leonidas would be genetically distinct from modern Greeks, and wasn’t that all Kemp was saying?  Get with the program!  The fundamental dishonesty of these types is laughable.

Good to see that the Type Is have a good division of labor thing going on here.  Some of them keep busy retconning their disproved dogmas in truly Orwellian fashion, while others shoot up Walmarts and plan bombings, or look at child porn, which a certain VDARE contributor thinks should not be illegal.  

All of this is the direct outcome of Der Movement’s strict affirmative action policy.  Keep on enabling it, all you imbeciles out there.  And keep sending in those “D’Nations” to your “leaders” – after all, how else are they going to go on their trips to Europe while you sit in your parents’ basement, onanistically reveling over Durocher’s latest Unz posts?

Advertisements

Gere and Silver

Flip sides of the same problem.

Read this.

Gere’s ancestry, from Wikipedia:

His paternal great-grandfather had changed the spelling of the surname from “Geer”.[1] Both of his parents were Mayflower descendants; Gere’s ancestors include Pilgrims Francis Eaton, John Billington, George Soule, Richard Warren, Degory Priest, Francis Cooke, and William Brewster.[1]

I’m shocked, shocked, I say.  He certainly passes any “extreme vetting” for an Alt Right meeting.  Indeed, he has all the requisite qualifications to be an Alt Right leader.

And now we have our friend Silver:

silviosilver ✓ᵀʳᵘᵐᵖ ˢᵘᵖᵖᵒʳᵗᵉʳ 

To call yourself a “Trump supporter” in 2016 was understandable, albeit naïve.  But to do so in 2019?

I would have liked to hear how the group defines “white.” I suspect they’re not playing by the “latino house rules,” in which 80% of Puerto Ricans get to call themselves white.

If they really believe that, say, 70% of Argentinians are White – in the sense of being the same as the Spanish, Italian, and German immigrant stocks – then they are indeed playing by those house rules.

Nonetheless, even a stricter definition will still be largely arbitrary. 

All they really have to do is reject New World admixture.

It will probably be impossibly difficult for the typical “white” Chilean to turn away someone only slightly less “white” simply because of some new urgency of qualifying oneself as white. 

Perhaps for the general population; I am not familiar with Chilean society.

After all, these are people who get along with each other and who share a common identity; breaking apart those bonds on the basis of an arbitrary racial distinction will surely strike them as absurd and immoral.

The same can be said for America as well.

In attenuated form, the same problem plagues the American scene.

Well, yes, but the solution is to sort out the problems, not revel in them.

Pro-white thinkers have not paid nearly enough attention to this issue. 

Now Silver is gaslighting.  Most “pro-White thinkers” “think” about nothing else.

In the past, there was little need to.

Which is why the entire “movement” is based upon it.

Infamously contemptuous WASP attitudes towards other racial kinds…

That Silver previously “infamously” supported.

…helped to etch comparatively solid racial and cultural lines. 

Didn’t stop them from opening the borders to other types.  Gotta have that cheap labor, I suppose.

And WASP demographic predominance meant that marginal cases could safely be filed away in the too hard basket. 

What is that supposed to mean?  Who knows?

That’s no longer the case. Whites have crossbred among themselves and with others – and continue to, at an accelerating rate – and most whites (and “quasi-whites”) subscribe to a common white culture. WASP contemptuousness has vanished. 

Vanished?  It is alive and well in Der Movement – it is indeed the bedrock of Der Movement.  It hasn’t completely vanished in the general society either – it manifests today as The Speaker Syndrome. The same types who grovel to the Negro may well harbor disdain for the White ethnic. And we have Richard Gere lovingly helping African migrants invade Southern Europe.

The result is blurred racial and cultural distinctions all the way down. 

Solutions to this are rejected out-of-hand by the inherent dogma of Der Movement.

Whites in North America are undoubtedly better positioned to save themselves than whites in Latin America, but the aforementioned issues make what was already a hard task even harder.

And Silver will do what he can to make that hard task even harder.

Gaslighting Greg at It Again

Pathetic.

Hunter Wallace has declared war on President Trump. He’s not the only one, of course, but he’s by far the most articulate.

That “most articulate” (by far!) declaration of war by Wallace is simply his reposting of someone else’s tweets. Laughable. This demonstrates why Johnson has to rank among the most fundamentally dishonest people in the Far Right today. He only addresses the low hanging fruit, and ignores real and legitimate criticism.

Johnson’s dishonesty is on display by comparing the following two paragraphs.

Trump’s America First, National Populist stances on immigration, globalization, and foreign policy resonated with millions of Americans: Republicans, independents, and even Democrats. Enough to win him the nomination and the Presidency.

But, as I never tire of pointing out, Trump did not have to take these positions to win. The whole system is premised on not giving the people what they want. Trump could have played by the system’s rules. Trump could have xeroxed the Jeb! platform and still won, based simply on his celebrity, money, and personality. In fact, it would have been easier for Trump to win that way, because by running a National Populist campaign, he had to fight a two-front war against Hillary Clinton and the Republican Party/Conservative Inc. establishment.

So, on the one hand, Trump’s campaign resonated because of his right-wing populism; on the other hand, he could have won simply by being Jeb II with a bigger personality. Johnson has to pull this sleight-of-hand nonsense because he needs to defend his own naive and simpleton-like belief – put in writing years ago and criticized here – that Trump was “sincere.” You see, the “proof” that Trump was “sincere” is that he ran a right-wing populist campaign even though he could have won by being a vulgar and ignorant version of Jeb Bush. Even though that “Trump’s America First, National Populist stances on immigration, globalization, and foreign policy resonated…Enough to win him the nomination and the Presidency.” The reality of course is that Trump’s personality and personal history was actually an impediment for certain important sections of the Republican electorate, who overlooked these flaws because of the promise of Trump’s right-wing populism.

Johnson keeps on peddling the same stupidity that I’ve refuted here time and again. Particularly the idea that Trump could have won on a Jeb Bush platform is so outrageous, it must win an all-time award for Imperial Gaslighting.

See this, emphasis added:

Johnson doesn’t believe Trump was a fraud from the beginning; after all, that would prove Sallis right and Johnson wrong, and we can’t have that. Johnson promotes the lie that Trump could have “cloned Jeb Bush’s platform” and still have won because of his “personality”- can you believe this? In reality, Trump’s campaign took off only after he started talking about Mexican rapists and started attacking the Bush family and their policies.  

What’s laughable is that right after Johnson makes his gaslighting comment, they all admit that people voted for Trump precisely because of his strong talk about immigration (these guys can’t get their stories straight from minute to minute.) – yes, that’s the point.  It was NOT Trump’s personality, which was actually a turn-off for many people who voted for him.  Does anyone believe that Republican voters, including evangelicals, would support a twice-divorced and thrice-married vulgar New York real estate tycoon and reality TV star who talks about his “big hands” and “grabbing pussies” IF this buffoon was merely a neoconservative clone of Jeb Bush?  Does any sane person believe that the enthusiasm that carried Trump to the nomination and then to the Presidency was based on his obnoxious jackass personality, independent of a hardline position on immigration and his America First domestic and foreign policy positions that were articulated during the campaign?…

…It is entirely possible that Trump has some very vague civic nationalist and populist beliefs. But they are likely not important to him, not crucial to his worldview; he is not serious or sincere about any of it in any hardcore, authentic fashion.  He does in fact embody, as Ted Cruz suggested, New York values. He has Jewish family connections, a deep attachment to Israel, and a fondness for Negroes. He is a self-centered narcissist and if he truly cares about anyone other than himself then it likely is his elder daughter Ivanka and no one else. He certainly doesn’t care about his base.  If Trump was (and is) sincere, then why does he ignore his base (e.g., Antifa attacks, State of the Union address), lie to his base (e.g., “the Wall is being built!”) and constantly betray his base (e.g., hiring Neocons, shilling for increased legal immigration, an aggressive foreign policy, pro-Negro “criminal justice reform”)?  The man cares more about pardoning Jack Johnson than he does about his own supporters being physically attacked in the streets and sent to the hospital. His own DOJ persecutes his followers when they defend themselves and ignores the leftist domestic terrorists running wild in the streets.  For Trump to be sincere and commit all his crimes of omission and commission against his base means that the man must be a psychotic retard. However, while he may be vulgar and ignorant, and may be a psychopath, he is not psychotic and he is not retarded…

…if he were sincere, he’s had 2.5 years to give some demonstration of it, and he has done the exact opposite.  He’s not sincere.  He’s a fraud and Johnson was wrong and Sallis was right.

Now back to Johnson’s screed:

When a man pays a huge price to campaign on issues that he didn’t need to win, that tells me that he is sincere. That’s why I believed Trump could save America. That’s why I did everything in my power to get him elected.

This is all about Johnson defending himself, not Trump. This is all about Johnson defending himself, so all you guys don’t realize how naive and inept he really is, so you keep sending in your “D’Nations” and allow him to live a better life than you do yourselves. How many trips to Europe have you taken recently?  

So what happened to the Trump presidency? Obviously, he encountered forces stronger than his convictions about what is necessary to save America. Many of these forces are external. Blackmail cannot be ruled out. Historians will be puzzling out the enigma of Trump well into the next century.

Or they could have been reading EGI Notes back in 2016.  I told you Trump was a fraud and a moron and I was correct.  Johnson – an affirmative action “leader” – was dead wrong, and can’t admit it without the entire facade he’s erected around himself collapsing.

Donald Trump is a tragic figure in the true sense of the word. We are witnessing the terrifying spectacle of a man of genuine greatness failing because of his own grievous faults.

A man of genuine greatness!  Who talked about his “big hands” at debates, and whose knowledge about America’s nuclear triad revolved around “devastation is really important.” This is a man whose policy decisions are influenced by Kim Kardashian and Kanye West. This is a man who sits back and does nothing while his own supporters are physically attacked with impunity; indeed, his own DOJ persecutes his own supporters. He behaves like a borderline retard, but he must be “a man of genuine greatness,” or else Johnson is exposed as a fool, and we can’t have that!

Now I have a serious question to pose to White Nationalists: 

Why support Greg Johnson?

If you want our movement to be in a position to mobilize the Trump electorate and turn it into a genuinely revolutionary National Populist movement, what should our stance be today and going into the 2020 election?

Der Movement needs to be destroyed.

Should we openly declare war on “Blompf”? Should we pour scorn on the “boomers” and “normies” who still support him? Should we announce our intention to tip the 2020 election to the Democrats?

Who is doing the latter?  Oh, that’s right, Johnson’s fellow Quota Queens.  Tulsi Gabbard!  Andrew Yang!  Thus cry the affirmative action cases.  They’ll be endorsing AOC next.

Believe me, folks, I understand the temptation. The A$AP Rocky fiasco is surely one of the most surreal and undignified episodes in the history of the American Presidency. 

But, let us not forget – Trump is a man of genuine greatness!  I mean, really now, EGI Notes told you, years ago, that Trump was a Negrophilic race cuck.  But keep on supporting Johnson and his impeccable pedigree.

And the entire “A$AP Rocky fiasco” undermines Johnson’s argument, as suggested in my last paragraph.  Why would a man of “genuine greatness” do something so outrageously,  embarrassingly stupid?  Is the “tragic figure” Trump being blackmailed to support Black rappers?  Was he blackmailed to pardon Jack Johnson or to push for “criminal justice reform” to allow Black criminals back on the streets?  Isn’t it more likely that Trump is simply a moron, a juvenile jackass, a fan of Negro entertainers, a man of genuine smallness and mediocrity?

And I understand why the Left would like to exploit the El Paso massacre to grab power, but it boggles the mind that Trump and the Republicans are basically willing to throw power away, undermining the First and Second Amendments merely to appease raving lunatics who think anyone to the Right of Hillary Clinton should be censored, disarmed, and eventually replaced by brown helots.

Hmm…would a man truly sincere in his beliefs do this?

Bashing Trump has several benefits:

1. It helps put a stake in the heart of the Man on White Horse Syndrome.

2. It exposes the pathetic failures of the Quota Queens, who followed up their Trump humiliation with endorsements of Tulsi Gabbard and Andrew Yang.

3. It clearly distinguishes White nationalism from Trumpian fraud and moronic civic nationalism.

These guys had three years to reach out to Trump supporters, and instead gave us Unite the Right, the Pilleater Chronicles, and the usual “movement” stupidities and dogmas.  They are protecting their own income stream.  Send in those “D’Nations”- that’s what it is all about. Defending Trump is all about defending their own record of hysterical Trump support.  MAGA!  Pepe!  Kek!

If average group intelligence defines “supremacy,” this is a “yellow supremacist” publication.

Well, since Amren is always harping on IQ, then it is a yellow supremacist publication, as I have previously stated, and got criticized for by all the usual suspects.

The Counter-Currents and Amren failings together point out the real problem.  The real problem is Der Movement, not Trump.  It never really mattered, in the end, if Trump was sincere or not.  Running that campaign,and being elected, was sufficient to set the stage. The 2016 election handed the baton to the “leaders” of the “movement” – who promptly dropped the baton in the toilet and flushed it away. Instead of building in depth we instead got obsessions over a cartoon frog, tiki torch marches and “Jews will not replace us,” Hermansson and Lewis, Pilleater’s accusations of cocaine use and homosexual sexual harassment at “racialist meetings,” the deranged fetishism of Durocher and Ash Donaldson, declarations that Anglin will be one of the new voices of WN 3.0 (remember that, Greg?), endorsements of Gabbard and Yang, and all the rest.  Trump didn’t fail the “movement,”  The “movement” failed itself.  And it failed you, dear reader.

Where to Donate?

A thought experiment.

Imagine an extremely wealthy White individual who wanted to donate money to causes that promoted the interests of European-derived peoples.

Where could they donate so that the money would be effectively used?

Apart from helping out with Salter’s research, always a noble cause, I cannot think of a single activity, group, blog, political party, or “movement leader” worth investing in, either here in America or abroad.  Not one. The moderately wealthy Regnery has funded certain activities, but, I myself do not see any of those activities as worthy.

There is nothing, absolutely nothing, a terrible indictment of Der Movement and its failed leadership.

Are we then surprised that some individuals, in desperation, likely feeling abandoned by the Quota Queen Tin Cup Brigade and their shameless panhandling for “D’Nations,” destroy themselves with foolish activities?

So, this thought experiment confirms what this blog has been saying for a long time – Der Movement is a pathetic failure and a complete waste, and, hence, there is currently nothing in the “movement” really worth investing in. Supporting certain aspects of relevant academic research would be good, as mentioned above, but as regards direct political and metapolitical activism, there is nothing.

The Unvarnished Truth about Recent Events

El Paso: Ideology vs. terrorism.

See thisAnd this.

See this.

And also this.

This is the reality: Only at EGI Notes will you hear the unvarnished truth about these events.  You will certainly not hear it from the System, with its hypocritical moral posturing and hysterical virtue signaling.  You will not hear it from a self-serving and inept “movement” either.

Truth: These events are basically cries for help, cries of desperation from White men who have been dumped on by the System and shit upon by society, men who believe, with justification, that their interests cannot be advanced through the political process, men who feel abandoned by everyone, including by a comically inept “movement” that has failed them time and again and that offers them nothing except disaster, defeat, and humiliation. 

 

The reaction to these events, from both the System and the “movement,” will do nothing but legitimize and amplify these feelings, will do nothing except increase the alienation of these people, will do nothing except make more events like what we have seen more likely.

More White men, particularly the youth, will observe the universal cries of condemnation of Whites, White interests, and everything these men stand for.  More will become radicalized. There will be zero – ZERO – calls for any understanding of these men, or concern about “backlash” – concern that always occurs with terror attacks by non-Whites. The System, already hostile to White interests, will become more hostile.  The political process, closed off to expressions of White interests, will become more closed off. The desperation and alienation of these men will be mocked, ridiculed, and labeled “evil.” Meanwhile, the “movement” will take no responsibility for having failed these men, and will react with self-serving podcasts and blog posts (perhaps with tin cup rattling for “D’Nations”); endorsements of Princess Tulsi Coconut and Andy Eggroll; and discussions about cephalic indices, racial admixture in Southern and Eastern Europe, Savitri Devi and Kali Yuga, and all the rest of the retarded stupidity that results in concerned young men realizing that the tragicomedy of “American White nationalism” has nothing to offer to them.

The validity of this truth will be confirmed by three facts:

1. There will be not a single mainstream politician or any other prominent person who will publicly declare that these unfortunate events occur because the System is hostile to White interests and desperate people believe that these interests cannot be addressed via the political process.  No one from the mainstream will state that we need to incorporate White interests – White racial interests – into public policy discussion.

2. There will be no pro-White “movement leader” who will be given a fair, respectful, and reasoned forum to explain these issues to the public, followed by a sincere and authentic consideration of these issues and their implications.

3. No pro-White “movement leader” will publicly accept responsibility and accountability for endless failure, this failure leading activists feeling so desperate that they lash out in a destructive manner.

You know this to be true, right?

Let’s consider System hypocrisy in all of this, and the confusion between beliefs and actions, a confusion that exists only when applied to beliefs that promote White interests. Remember congressional hearings about “White supremacism” and comments by Presidential candidates about the so-called dangers of “White nationalism.”

There’s a difference between an ideology, a belief system (that can include religion) and terrorism that may be related to that ideology.  From a law enforcement, legal, and public safety standpoint, the issue has to be with actions and with people and groups who plan and commit those actions, not with underlying ideologies that are assumed, or professed, to be the alleged impetus for those actions.

Some examples will suffice.  Assume a person or group attacks an abortion clinic based on professed Christian belief.  We may call the actors terrorists and the acts terrorism, but what public figure would then proceed to call Christianity itself terrorism? When Muslims commit terrorism, the System is careful to distinguish between the terrorists and the religion that they practice. When leftists were committing terrorist outrages in 1960s and 1970s America on a regular basis, Marxist professors were allowed to promote their ideology on American campuses. Even when people like Ted Cruz are pushing (with justification) for Antifa to be declared a terrorist group, they refer to that informal organization and its adherents, and the actions they plan and perform. These conservatives are NOT labeling Marxism or Anarchism as terrorism.

In every case, a clear distinction is made between an ideology, a belief system, a religion, and anyone or any group committing terrorism ostensibly on behalf of those memetic systems.

Now we have people screeching about “White nationalist” and “White supremacist” terrorism.  Of course, a clear distinction between beliefs and acts is NOT being made in this case. That’s not surprising because the entire raison d’etre of the System is hatred of Whites and repression of White interests. The “Great Replacement” is not a “conspiracy theory” but demonstrative fact; even the United Nations openly calls for “replacement migration.”  And The Great Replacement is a major objective of the System; thus, do you expect them to be honest about dissidents to this objective?  One should not be surprised by the hypocrisy and double standards here – random “lone wolf” attacks (with NO underlying organizational structure behind them) are being used to smear an ideology, while in all the previous cases, where the connection between ideology and terrorist organization is much more developed, the underlying ideologies were always left sacrosanct.

Thus, Antifa is a terrorist organization based on Marxist and anarchist beliefs, which themselves are not being labeled as terrorism, or even any sort of danger to America. To be consistent, if any WN organization exists that plans and executes acts of political violence, then such an organizing is terrorist, but the underlying ideology is not.  Lone wolf attackers are terrorists, but whatever belief system they profess is not.  An alleged “free society” like America must make distinctions between belief and action.

This by no means takes Der Movement off the hook for its stupidity.  But that stupidity is not criminal, it is not terrorism, it is something to be adjudicated internally, by the rank-and-file abandoning the failed “leadership” and abandoning the failed dogmas.

Once again, I’m calling out Der Movement.  It is NOT – repeat NOT – true that “movement” rhetoric is promoting such actions. Instead, I posit that “movement” ineptitude can make people frustrated and they develop the feeling that “acting out” is their only option.  If there was a real movement that could absorb the activist energies of young White men and put those energies to good use, these things would not happen.  Instead we have a “movement leadership” consisting of retards, perverts, grifters, and incompetent affirmative action cases. We have “leaders” that refuse to fully accept responsibility for their failures.


Laughably self-unaware. Rewritten:

I blame Greg Johnson and the other Quota Queens for the #ElPasoTerroristAttack. If they had built a viable movement and stopped the litany of endless failure, Patrick Crusius would not have committed this desperate act.

Repeating the same post over and over again with different names and locations filled in doesn’t deal with the situation. It doesn’t address the fundamental issue of responsibility and accountability for failures more long-standing than those of Trump.  Is this “leadership?”

And – coming back to the System – the politicians denouncing “White nationalism” actually are promoting, not inhibiting, further violence, as they leave desperate Whites with the impression that there is no hope for promoting their interests through the political process. People have given up viewing the System as legitimate and have given up on any chances of reform.  All of the moral posturing and virtue signaling is increasing the chances of the very thing they ostensibly oppose and denounce.

Basically, it all boils down to this – young White men are increasingly giving up on the System as they do not believe that their interests can be advanced through participation in the political process. They are also giving up on the idea that their interests can be advanced by the retards, perverts, morons, and grifters that make up Der Movement.  No one is offering real solutions to this problem. The System’s “solutions” will only make it worse (intentionally?).  Der Movement is incapable of offering any real solutions.  This problem will not go away. Expect more such tragedies.  Expect to hear the truth only at this blog and nowhere else.

Der Movement: July 9, 2019

In all cases, emphasis added.

Heddi
Replying to @RichardBSpencer
1) Richard, risk involvement reduces the influx of quality people to exactly ZERO. People who have lives/families to shatter by social ostracism or job loss will not ever involve themselves visibly, thus alt right was anonymous online phenomenon.‏

2) The condition to attract quality people – those who do not come from a “nothing to lose anyway” position – is the erasure of risk. How to do it? Marry risk erasure with incentives of heightened prospects of living conditions. Immerse immediate benefits into joining. Think.

Point number one is fairly obvious but very important, and perhaps not obvious to the grand poohbahs who represent themselves as “movement leadership.”  And this is something I’ve written about before, more than once.  

As far as point two goes, I essentially agree, except that “erasure of risk” is unrealistic. There is risk in everything, even driving a car or walking down a flight of stairs. Obviously, involvement in dissident political/metapolitical activity that is opposed by the entire System, by virtually the entire political spectrum, is going to have inherent risk.  Instead, we should talk of “risk management” and “risk minimization” – far more realistic objectives.  That is opposed to the typical “risk maximization” of Der Movement.  As an example of reasonable minimization, see the 2019 Amren meeting; while Unite the Right, the fate of Ricky Vaughn, Hermansson and Lewis infiltrations, IE Discord, and similar antics exemplify risk maximization.

And as far as incentives go – there are none.  Community building? Resistance to social pricing? Alternative infrastructures and economic viability for low-to-medium scale activists (as opposed to the “Happy Penguins” soaking up the “D’Nations”)?  Camaraderie?  Normalcy?  None of that. Instead we see sour defectiveness, bizarre freakishness, and endless failure.

A comparison between the Type I-style and Type II-style “alpha males” is shown in this short clip from Twin Peaks Season 3. Ray Monroe exemplifies the style of alpha maleness prized by the Type I defectives of “game” such as Roissy – a snide, smirking, sneering, joking, obnoxious jackass.  Mr. C, on the other hand, displays a more Type II-style sense of alpha maleness – aggressive, driven, serious, threatening, focused, with the “alphaness” focused with the “want” vs. “need” distinction.  Note how the two interact – Mr C putting Monroe in his place but the latter refusing to acknowledge it other than a begrudging slight nod and semi-grunt, followed by more of the same annoying jerkboy behavior.

This is a useful contrast because it is the Type I behavior that has led to the downfall of the Alt Right and damaged (American) racial nationalism.  All you need to do is listen to (drunken) “movement” podcasts and read “movement” blog posts and comments threads and you’ll observe Ray Monroes aplenty.  Unfortunately, Mr Cs are few and far between, so the snark to seriousness ratio approaches infinity.

The paradigm of “Sallis is always right” extends to my opinion of Durocher, whose latest inane screed can be found here.  Note the Bliss vs. Malla insanity in the comments thread, which is a direct result of Durocher’s constant shilling of an unscientific, ahistorical, cartoonish Ostara-style version of racial history.  Note then the Nutzi Germanic lunatics, the raging defectives, sweaty fetishists, and all the rest.  It’s no coincidence that such freaks come out of the woodwork with a Durocher post.  As they say – garbage in, garbage out.

Once again Sallis is right – remember this:

Some will object – what about Europe?  They have repressive speech codes and aren’t the national governments there considered legitimate by the people?  First, I can’t speak for rightist Europeans – it is very possible that the growth of populism there is indicative of a growing element that does indeed consider the System illegitimate. And, second, the USA, with its particular history of, and alleged commitment to, free speech, is expected to exhibit a much stronger association between free expression and political legitimacy than do nations that have histories of kings, dictators, strongmen, and laws against lese majeste. What about the argument that European nationalists have had success despite the speech codes there?  What success?  In some nations, there has been a temporary slowdown in the degeneration, which can be quickly reversed by any subsequent leftist government; at best, there have been victories by civic nationalists and moderate petty nationalists. The “grand success” in Europe is a figment of the Nutzi imagination. And I can turn the argument around – imagine how much more successful the European Right could be if they could actually express their real views without fear of being fined or jailed?

So, no, the pathetically flimsy “successes” in Europe – which in any case have limited relevance to the American situation – in no way disprove the thesis put forth here.  Given the concerns of White nationalists, the situation in Europe remains dire. Demographic replacement is still “baked into the cake” there. Can European nationalists freely and frankly discuss these concerns?

So, yeah, I’m sure the vaunted Swedish ethnonationalists will go from victory to victory when it is considered a crime to merely state the desire to deport criminal migrants.  

Laugh at this.  Soporific blog posts?

After a hard day of writing inspirational articles for Counter-Currents (under various pennames)

Multiple pennames? If true, that would help explain the devastating decline of quality at that site.

…I mix myself a drink that consists of vodka, soda water, lots of lime juice, and lots of ice.

What is it with Type I Alt Right and drinking alcohol?

Taylor, Strom, and Russia

In Der Movement.

Another good video by Taylor.  Promoting and defending the concept of White advocacy is obviously a strength of Taylor.

Three brief points.

First, there was never any reason to believe CNN would “play fair,” and I hope people “on our side” will stop believing, and talking to, the press.

Second, Kauffmann is no friend of ours; see here.

Third, European nationalists may not have no choice not to speak about race, given the “hate speech” laws they have there, and the risks of ending up with fines and/or prison sentences for saying or writing the wrong thing.

That said, it is one unfortunate side effect of the despicable EU in that it has soured a feeling of common “Europeaness” among Europeans, particularly those with healthy instincts. Although, to the globalists, that may be a feature, and not a bug, of their EU creation. Turning Europeans against each other has always been a major component of the enemy’s toolkit – said enemy also including the HBDers.

Unfortunately, the level of support given by our readers is insufficient for us to send one representative and speaker, much less two or three as the ICPF would have preferred, to a conference in Moscow. If our readers and listeners step up to the plate, perhaps we can directly participate next year. But we did send a written copy of the speech by Miss Neubauer in lieu of her actual appearance, for distribution to all the attendees, and I will share that speech with you today.

A few points.  

First, this was an excellent speech, with content much in accord with my own views. 

Second, if Neubauer has a husband born in Alaska (now, who can that be?) why is it Miss Neubauer?  

Third, I think that the speech was written by Strom; that is his style and level of intelligence. 

Fourth, if Strom is upset that his group doesn’t have the money to send anyone to Moscow, he should read this. I understand that Strom may not want to be seen as attacking competitors for donations, but the reality is that every dollar that goes to Brimelow and race-mixing Philosemite Derbyshire is a dollar that doesn’t go to Strom and the National Alliance. The “tide raises all boats” theory of potentially unlimited funds to share among activists is, at least for now, a pipedream. If Strom doesn’t confront the HBDers, they’ll continue their grifting ways, parasitizing the “movement,” and leaving behind a dried out husk.

Fifth, and no offense, but the National Alliance has been around for 45 years.  If it is really, as they assert, the leading activist vehicle for European American interests, then why can’t they, after so many years of activity, scrape together the funds to send someone to Moscow? Even a relatively new and small scale operation like Counter-Currents can repeatedly send Johnson to Europe, and yet the vaunted National Alliance is helpless to send at least one individual to a conference in Russia. You can that see my skepticism from last week is justified.

As regards Russia, I know I have readers from that nation, and I hope that most of those are ethnic Russians, and more so, that some are Russian nationalists or, better yet, Russian White nationalists. A brief message to those readers – you may not agree with all I write here, for example some of my criticisms of Putin, Dugin, and Raciology, or my championing of Ukrainian self-determination, but I hope it is clear that, unlike other areas of Western racial nationalism, I am pro-Russian.  Indeed, I am “pro” every European ethny; I do not play favorites.  With respect to Russia, that nation and its civilization has a vital role to play in the future of the White race (if such a future exists) and one can only have admiration for the cultural, scientific, and technical achievements of the Russian people.  As I wrote above, I am in accord with most of the Strom/Neubauer speech.