Category: Old Movement

More Blackpills

Some hard truths. In all cases, emphasis added.

Stop spending on her.  That includes not giving money to female Alt Lite YouTubers so that they can – in the words of a certain “movement leader” – buy all sorts of silly, frilly things.

Let’s consider prostitution. There are good reasons to crack down on prostitution, and I support such a crackdown.  However, I suspect that one reason why some people – particularly women – oppose prostitution is that it hits a bit too close to home: women exchanging sex for money is just a more crass and “in your face” version of the typical “beta bux” female approach of exchanging sex for male provision and resources.  And then there is the competition aspect – if men can get what they want with a straightforward cash payment, instead of the commitment package that includes continual emotional torment, then that may be a preferred choice, putting typical women at a competitive disadvantage.  After all, from a MGTOW perspective, marriage (or any other long-term relationship) is a form of prostitution as well.

That said, the health aspect, the family formation and societal stability aspect, and aspects of honor and dignity (for all involved) argue against prostitution – but at the same token, one must crackdown on “alpha fux, beta bux” as well. A traditional patriarchal (Western) society is a prerequisite for any serious crackdown against prostitution.

The “God Emperor” is an incompetent, disloyal, low-life cuck.

Yet all these Never Trumpers apparently have more job security than genuine Trump supporters

…The worst example of this craven behavior: the case of former White House speechwriter Darren Beattie. Beattie was fired for the grievous crime of delivering an unexceptionable speech at a conservative academic conference also addressed (equally unexceptionably) by VDARE.com’s own Peter Brimelow.

Remember, Beattie sacrificed his promising academic career (tenure-track position at Duke) to support Trump in the 2016 election. But that obviously meant nothing to his superiors. He was let go by a communications shop that sorely lacks the speechwriter’s intellect and courage.

Another disheartening example is found in the termination of Taylor Weyeneth. This 24-year-old worked on the Trump campaign first as unpaid volunteer, then worked his way up. Weyeneth eventually rose in the White House to take a top job in its drug policy office. But then a Washington Post story came out on his alleged lack of credentials, and he was summarily fired. His loyalty and long-time support of the President made no difference in the face of bad press. [Promoted six times and then fired: Inside a 24-year-old political appointee’s wild ride in Trump’s Washington, by Robert O’Harrow Jr., Washington Post, June 15, 2018]…

Yet ultimately, the buck stops with President Trump. He has little awareness that personnel is policy and appears not to care much about staff decisions aside from a few top aides. He outsourced staffing decisions to the GOP Establishment, which promptly filled “his” administration with Trump’s enemies.

Using postage stamps to measure East Asian erections.  Sounds about right.  They can use those stamps as makeshift bras for the “women” as well.

Let’s see.  The execrable Zman hangs out at racialist conferences, is buddies with Johnson, lacks understanding of why European nationalism is more successful than the American version (you know, the one that Johnson is a “leader” of), while at the same time not realizing that that nationalism is not half as successful as American Nutzis think it is.

Sounds about right.  And get this:

…Frodi took the opportunity to make a point that I don’t think gets made enough. What he said was that one crazy person in your movement can chase off hundreds of normal people. Therefore, the top duty of any political or cultural movement is to guard against being associated with crazies. This seems obvious to me, but our side of the great divide has struggled to get this right.

Yes sir!  After all, folks who talk about the pyramids of Atlantis being built by psychokinesis, or who promote war and ethnic cleansing among Europeans or who think “extreme vetting” is to ask “are you Swedish?” are the paragons of sanity, while those who are constantly correct time and again, who show foresight and predictive value, and who make cogent criticisms of Der Movement, are “crazy and bitter.” The problem, dear Zman, is that your “movement” “guards against” the sane, informed, and competent, while openly embracing defectives, Nutzis, and false dogma.  One wonders if any of these self-proclaimed guardians realize that some would consider them to be the crazies?


In addition, it’s a wonder that American Nutzis can get anything done at conferences held in Scandinavia.  One would think they’d be in a perpetual state of orgasm from all the concentrated Nordicness.  One could imagine some of these fellows running manically through the streets, asking random strangers (natives, not immigrants) if they would like to attend an extreme-vetted meeting.  Maybe be a guest speaker?  

These guys should instead hold their conferences somewhere in Southern Europe, where their disgust at the native population would keep them safely within the walls of the conference hall, concentrating on the tasks at hand.

Advertisements

Endless Debunking

Taking out the trash is good, no doubt, but there’s more to life than trash.

Let’s see now – a HBD “race realist” is opposed to pan-Europeanism and is hostile to White ethnics.  Will wonders never cease?  New breaking news: the sun will rise in the east tomorrow.  Shocking! Unprecedented!

Seriously though, see this.  That goes into the whole problem of confusing descriptive and prescriptive memes, as well as the problem in getting descriptives wrong in the first place.

And it goes deeper than this, to the very heart of the issue: EGI vs. HBD; Salter stressing genetic kinship (i.e., EGI) over some sort of hierarchical ranking of phenotypic traits (i.e., HBD).

Not surprisingly, HBDers are typically hostile to “Salterism.”  HBD is a political movement dedicated to destroying White nationalism, with a long term goal of establishing polities ruled by Jews and Asians, with “First World White strains” as a subaltern stepandfetchit caste (and their woman as concubines for Jews and Asians).  Now, that’s not what the HBDers overtly preach of course, and many of them would genuinely reject that proposition – but it doesn’t matter if the outcome is intentional or not; regardless, the eventual outcome of HBD politics will be the same whether it is from mendacity or just plain stupidity.

Interestingly, despite the fact that HBD is incompatible with WN, the “movement” has a strong HBD faction.  Why so?  Well, first, Der Movement activists are not too bright.  Second, HBDers try to appeal to “First World strain” WNs by, essentially, patting them on the head and telling them how very, very Hajnal they all are.  You’re part of the cogelite crowd, my friends!  Ego-stroking is a powerful tool of memetic seduction.  Third, many so-called WNs are not really racial nationalists at all, not in the way it is properly defined.  These people support Whites only because they view Whites as the embodiment of certain traits; one can remember Jobling being a “pro-White activist” because Whites actualize Rawlsian liberalism.

So, there’s a lot of confusion and ideological incoherence in Der Movement (expected given the predominance of brain-addled Type I activists). Further, given the presence of a strong HBD faction along with a strong Nordicist faction (with some overlap between those groups), we have a situation that Der Movement really has not much of anything to offer to White ethnics.  Racial nationalism however does indeed have much to offer to those groups; indeed, everything to offer, if survival is the ultimate interest (i.e., genetic continuity).

It is important not to confuse Der Movement with the concept of racial nationalism.  An analogy would be the error of confusing the Republican Party has being the same as conservatism.  No, the former is merely a vehicle for the latter, and a poor vehicle at that.  Similarly, Der Movement is a pitifully pathetic vehicle for genuine racial nationalism, and a new vehicle is desperately required.

And, really, the amount of digital ink spilled over this tragicomic freak Faulk is disturbing.  There are so any other things of importance to discuss and analyze that to waste time and effort on someone who is essentially speaking a different language, with a different and incompatible worldview is, frankly, disgusting.  Why not tackle some of Salter’s more recent writings and analyses, for example?

Or, formulate your own worldview, instead of constantly “debunking” every memetic trash spewed forth from every and piece of flotsam and jetsam with an Internet connection.

There comes a time to advance and defend a strongly held position, a concrete and substantial worldview, instead of merely critiquing strawman misrepresentations of what others misconstrue what your position is (or should be).  I’m guilty of this as well, to be honest.  Certainly, this blog can benefit from more “what should be done” posts instead of “don’t do this.”

One final point for this post.  It is a strawman representation of White nationalism to assert that WNs consider all Whites as part of their ingroup, they want every single White person as part of their erthnostate.  No, every White person is potentially a part of the ingroup, but that depends on the people themselves as well. I’m not interested in SJW Whites, and am certainly not interested in White HBDers and other trash.  Yes, we can try and convince, but in the end, why should we want to accept enemies?  The idea is ludicrous.

The Six Percent Has Collected Some Interest

Odds and ends.

Ted Sallis, 8/28/18.

Der Movement, 9/4/18

Apparently, the six percent has collected a week’s worth of interest.

Once again: you want cutting edge racialist ideas?  Come to EGI Notes. Want belated second hand views?  Check out Der Movement, Inc., a money-making enterprise. 

The problem you see is taking someone like Ryan Faulk seriously, just like Der Movement took Jorjani seriously, just like they take anyone seriously who has a pulse, is at least semi-White, and mumbles something close to being pro-White.  There is no quality control in Der Movement.  There is no ability to discern what is or is not important.  The more they talk about eschewing defectives the more they embrace them.  This long and rambling Counter-Currents article would have been unnecessary if Faulk has been (properly) ignored in the first place.  Indeed, one of the basic flaws of Der Movement is getting involved in these autistic (which is why it attracts autistics in the first place) nitpicking “arguments” from every droolcup who has an Internet connection.  So, Faulk is “down” on WN?  Who cares?  There’s a problem with the “Genetic Mesh” whatever that is?  Let’s worry about the “Genetic Knit” instead, or perhaps the “Genetic Slipknot.”  Some random retard on the Internet decides he thinks that “Europeans are not as genetically similar as he thought?”  Who cares?  The genetic data are what they are, regardless of whatever someone thinks about them; genetic similarity is a relative term, with meaning when compared to others, as Salter’s work made clear 15 years ago.  Indeed, the fact that Faulk gets several orders of magnitude more attention from Der Movement than does Salter tells you all you need to know.  Dat dere “genetic mumbo jumbo” is just too sophisticated after all, let’s have discussion instead about  “Kali Yuga” and “hobbit holes” and leave talk of genetics to “experts” such as Faulk or anyone else who can fog a mirror held up to their nose.

Three major errors WNs make, especially when debating critics:

1. Not understanding descriptive realities.  For example, genetic relationships between Europeans, or any group, can be discerned from population genetics. Those studies tell us that there is often less genetic diversity within the continent of Europe as a whole than there is among certain non-European single ethnic groups.  Europe is the most genetically homogeneous of the continents; of course there are significant differences as well (North/South; East/West).  The biopolitical implications of these similarities and differences are discussed in Salter’s work.  More recently, I tackled the issue of “genetic integration” here at EGI Notes.  If you do not know the facts, then don’t bother debating with online retards who are equally ignorant of the facts; you all just make fools of yourselves.

2. Not understanding that descriptive realities can change over time.  The king of this stupidity was the great and good Sir Desmond Jones, who pontificated that demographic snapshots of, say, the year 2000, could be projected into the future, unchanging to the ends of time, forever and ever, amen.  That’s great.  Hey!  America in 2018 still has a majority-White population; hence, 100 years from now, it is guaranteed to also be majority White, because things never change, and trends never come to fruition. The current snapshot exists forever without change, right?

3. Most of all, not understanding the difference between descriptive and prescriptive.  Even IF something is true now, and even IF we disregard trends suggesting change, isn’t it the whole point of dissident revolutionary politics that you promote prescriptive policies that constitute a change from current descriptive state of affairs?  True, there are some things that can never be changed, but we are not talking laws of nature here; instead, we are talking about politics (ever changing) and human characteristics (that, even at their most biological, change over time due to evolutionary forces, etc.).  If there is some given factoid that really does argue against some tenet of WN, then this is something that should be changed (if it can be, and usually it can be). If there is some sort of mental or political or social impediment to the world we want to see come into being, we must work to remove the impediment not just placidly and passively accept it.  One can take passive acceptance of the descriptive to the extreme: America is currently a multiracial nation immersed in anti-White policies and headed to minority-White Third World status.  If we cannot change any descriptives, then we must accept America as it is and just “defend the racial status quo” (as Amren Jews advise us).  I suppose “conservatives” would oppose change, regardless of how beneficial, and would always value descriptive over prescriptive.  But a true movement of change would push a prescriptive agenda, backed by a rock solid core ideology, and always understand that descriptions of reality are ever-changing (see point 2), not set in stone, and it should be our prescriptions, not that of the Left, that changes the description of reality.

Read this.

Thoughtful? I immediately knew that nothing I said would be reflected in the article…

Why did you do the interview in the first place?  Johnson was right about one thing: all these “leaders” use the media to help anoint them, and confirm them, in their (affirmative action allowed) “leadership” positions.  Oh boy, look, Brimelow is attacked as a “racist” in print, let’s send him some more money.

For the record, I regard myself as a civic nationalist…

Of course.  After all, nothing is more important than keeping “Rosie and the kids” in America.  That’s what HBD is all about.  And we wouldn’t want Derb to get upset or anything and stop posing for those CT suburb lawn chair photos.

HBD Nordicist Gamester Roissy: Sessions as Attorney General alone justifies the Trump Presidency.

Sallis: Antifa Jeff Sessions is a do-nothing quota queen traitor and idiot.

Hey, Roissy, apparently your “God Emperor” agrees more with Sallis.

Again, again, and again: Sallis right, Der Movement wrong.  They are always wrong.  In fact, the only thing they are right about is being consistently wrong.

Keep on supporting them though, and then wonder why racial activism goes nowhere.

Alt Right Decay and Other News

More odds and ends.

I must have missed all of this when I was offline. Very interesting.

Please note the mention of July 22, likely related to this.

I mean, how much does Sallis have to be right over and over and over again before all you rank-and-file activist retards (yes, that’s appropriate if you don’t change your ways) wake up and realize that all your leaders are pitifully inept and morally obtuse?  It’s one defeat after another (and I’m not even going to get into Kessler being publicly humiliated by his father, since he’s living with his parents and obviously too dense to realize that if they oppose his views he probably shouldn’t be podcasting out of their home, particularly when they are there) – they are all hopeless.  They are pure – PURE – affirmative action appointments, and it are all of you, dear retards, who are the ones doing the appointing.  Keep it up and soon the “movement” will end up consisting of two guys wearing clown suits, throwing pies in each others’ faces, as the Guk audience laughs it up.

And, no, Greg, being a purebred mountain wop didn’t save you from being the middleman in another “movement” fiasco.  These Stepandfetchit Shabbos Suds never learn. You’re just not “leadership material.”  You are just a lowly pawn, not a Quota Queen.  No, not a “general,” maybe a “lieutenant.”  But only the latter as long as you keep your girlfriend around.

Also see this.

Eulogy for the Alt Right: this is absolutely hilarious, Semitic gold.  Oy vey!

Altright.com: stick a fork in it. 

Who was it who termed the Alt Right as “Beavis-and-Butthead White nationalism?”  Who was it who criticized the immaturity of all these nitwits?  Who predicted (and hoped for) the collapse of the “Alt Right brand?”  Who was it who warned that equating White nationalism with the Alt Right was a deadly mistake (at the same time that others, who now make believe they were always disdainful of the Alt Right brand, were writing that “the Alt Right is White nationalism or it is nothing at all”)?

Readers of this blog know the answer to those questions, eh?

Outrageous hypocrisy: this from someone advocating Europeans ethnic cleansing each other. Is it wise for any of these types suggesting that their ideological opponents are motivated by personal issues?  One can point the finger in many directions as far as that goes.

And this reminds me how amused I was with people taking sides in the Greg Johnson vs. Richard Spencer feud.  From my perspective, the two of them are the same.  As a Jack Vance character would say: “it is all one.”  These are all failed leaders killing your race, my race, our race.  And YOU allow them to.  Can you look at yourself in the mirror?

Let’s rewrite:

“Remember you are an Englishman and have consequently won first prize in the lottery of life.” — Cecil Rhodes, British imperialist, 1910

New: 

“Remember you are ethnically an Englishman (or of related stock) and have consequently won automatic elevation to leadership of Der Movement, Inc. (a money-making enterprise)” – Ted Sallis, disgusted Nutzi swarthoid, 2018

Another cogelite.  Colored is as colored does: the South-South alliance continues.

Mission accomplished!  Trump believes he’s made American great again, already, you know, with continued unchecked Third World immigration, both legal and illegal, Antifa rioting in the streets with impunity, a Far Left Attorney General, his own sky-high disapproval ratings, White dispossession on schedule, and a Left culturally triumphant at every step.

But, hey, he pardoned Jack Johnson so, as he says, mission accomplished!

Never forget that Der Movement, Inc. (a money-making enterprise) labeled Trump “the God Emperor” and while that designation may have been tongue-in-cheek, the statements that he was “the last chance for White America” and an “American Caesar who will stabilize White demographics” were not.

Red Chile: More racial delusions – another retarded Amren article on race.

Chile has never lost a war, and today its technologically advanced, well equipped, and well trained military is feared and envied by its neighbors.

Yes, that feared Chilean military.  How about a war with a European nation and we’ll see how that turns out?

In the 19th century, Chile decisively defeated its two northern neighbors Bolivia and Peru…

Another great moment in military history; the campaigns of a Caesar, Napoleon, or von Manstein are nothing compared to that.

Chile is 88.9 percent white, 9.1 percent Araucano Indian, and 2 percent other—almost entirely composed of other much smaller Amerindian nations.

And then he cites population genetics studies that demonstrate that most of those “Whites” are actually mestizos.

A Chilean who is 50 percent Italian, 25 percent Basque, and 25 percent Greek would be considered white as well—though his skin may be darker than a Chilean who is actually less European, such as one who is 10 percent Araucano, 10 percent Incan, 50 percent Spanish, and 30 percent Belgian.

Gasp!  OMG!  Note the word “may.”  Yes, and an Englishman “may” have skin darker than a light-skinned Korean, and a planet in the Andromeda galaxy “may” be made of yellow cheese.

Because of the large presence of Mediterranean whites, the genotype and phenotype of whiteness in Chile do not correlate as neatly as in the Anglosphere. The result of this is that Chileans have a “big tent” view of whiteness…

You see what is going on here.  All sorts of Latino and NEC mixed-racers eagerly try and grasp onto “Med” coattails to prove how very “White” they are.  Here’s the bottom line: compare a “White” Chilean to the base parental populations from Europe – mostly Spanish and Basque, but perhaps some Italians and others as well, and get back to me.  Oh wait, it’s already been done, with the cited population genetics papers.

And as far as the pictures go, Navarro and Vidal are clearly non-White, by any European standard (including swarthoid ones), so I’m not sure what the point is there, except to confirm that the “big tent” view of Whiteness of Chile does not correlate to anywhere in Europe, not only the “Anglosphere.”

The Six Percenters

Lost opportunities.

Consider the condition of White America today and the continued deterioration of the White racial position.  6%?  Six?  It should be, at least, 60%.  What kind of pathetic maladaptive sick losers are White people?  Whites are positively subhuman in their lack of adaptive fitness, in their pathological altruism, in their demented and disgusting self-abasement.  And even if the 6% is a low figure, because “people are afraid to give honest answers in the survey,” would it really speak better of Whites if it was, say, 8% or 9%?  And do you really expect people who are afraid to even answer a survey honestly to be useful potential recruits for an activist cause?

However, even if the 6% figure is shockingly low, it still translates into millions of people, as many as 11 million.  How is Der Movement utilizing this potential pool of recruits?  Consider if Der Movement was just able to mobilize 10% of those people to start with.  That’s 1.1 million White Americans – a considerable activist force if properly utilized and motivated.  If each of those contributed just $10 per year (just $10!) that would be $11 million added to “movement” coffers (putting aside that current “movement leaders” would waste the money).  If each gave $100 per year – that’s $110 million.  If these activists and their donations were in part utilized to recruit more of the remaining group of the “racist 6%” then all these numbers would grow dramatically.  

All this potential, all this opportunity: wasted.  Instead we get prancing quota queens with their Unite the Right cosplay rallies, their bizarre fossilized dogma, their errors and stupidities and obsessions, their complete lack of security, their Jew-worship and Yellow Supremacy, everything designed to repel and repulse potential recruits.

Only new leadership, with fresh ideas, strategic vision, and a commitment to long-term planning can win over the six percenters.  The “movement” has had its chances, and failed time and time again.

A Tradition of Success

It is lacking in racial nationalism.

The “movement” lacks a Tradition of Success.  This problem cannot be over-stated.  Success breeds success. Yes, it is true that you can learn from failure – although the “movement” seems incapable of doing so – but an excess of failure is poison to the growth of a dissident movement.

In contrast, success brings confidence, success brings followers (people love a winner), success brings resources, success provides a margin of error that allows the successful to take calculated risks (which is not the same as foolhardy risks) – the sort of high-risk/high-reward approaches that yield further success.  It is important, absolutely crucial, to nurture success.  When the “movement” “plans” things stupidly, when they set themselves up for failure, when they do things that you know in advance are going to fail, this leads to disillusionment, loss of morale, despair, a culture of failure.  Just as success breeds success, failure breeds failure.  Sometimes it seems like racialist activists are just going through the motions, doing things that they – and everyone else – know is going to end in failure, because they don’t know what else to do and despair of actually winning at anything.  And the failure has been endless.

Revilo Oliver talking about 50 years of “movement” failure… 50 years ago.  Consider David Duke leading and abandoning one organization after another – KKK, NAAWP, EURO (originally NOFEAR, which had its name legally challenged, which is another typical “movement” defeat paradigm – remember the Church of the Creator lawsuit name defeat); Duke’s legal problems (and that of Strom); Richard Spencer jumping from one failed project to another; Spencer forced to cancel his college speaking tour; cancelled conferences (AmrenVDARE, NPI, etc.); Spencer and others being physically attacked in public with impunity; Spencer’s Budapest meeting fiasco; public rallies in which the rightists are typically outnumbered, attacked, and ritually humiliated; Johnson deciding to focus on YouTube just as YouTube is censoring the Right; all the feuds and fall-outs; the outrageous embarrassment of the “extreme vetting” infiltrations – including having a (transparent) infiltrator invited to give a speech on the “dangers of infiltrators” and being allowed to participate in the vetting process; the destructive stupidities of Kessler; the Heimbach-Parrot comedy; the Man on White Horse Syndrome error repeated again and again; the failures of overt neo-Nazis like Rockwell and Pierce, defeats, losses, back-tracks, and social pricing; Derek Black turning on the “movement” and against his father’s ideals; the deplatforming; the failed gamble on mainstreaming in Europe. When is the last time the “movement” – particularly in America – had a clear success?  I suppose that Amren occasionally holds successful conferences – as long as the police do their job and as long as judges don’t impose conditions inimical to the conference (e.g., allowing violent leftist thugs direct access to the venue).  But that small-scale sporadic success – which has not been consistently reproducible – is not enough, not by a long shot.  And no, the election of the fraud Trump is not a “success” of the “movement”- and even if Trump is sincere, his election was due to forces independent of the Pepe/Kek crowd.

Now, I understand that sometimes calculated (not foolhardy) risks need to be taken.  I understand that sometimes a dissident movement can benefit from a “glorious failure” – a practical defeat that serves as a rallying cry, as a moral victory to galvanize support.  Pierce spoke of Mathews and the failed crusade of The Order as such an example.  Yockey’s own personal crusade ended in jailhouse suicide.  And there is the end of WWII, with remnants of the SS – including the French Charlemagne division – making a last stand in the ruins of Berlin.  That’s true.  But, first, one cannot build a successful movement on endless failure, even “glorious failure,” and, second, most examples of “movement” failure are not inspiring moral victories. Unite the Right (I or II) was not a heroic defense of the Fuhrerbunker; Patrik Hermannson’s infiltration was not Francis Parker Yockey’s lonely last decision; Spencer getting elbowed in the face was not Mathews’ last stand on Whidbey Island.  So let’s get real here.  There comes a time when success needs to be “baked into” the plans, to pursue prudent courses of action that directly channel activity in successful directions.

Three tenets:

1. Most activity, particularly at early stages of development (where racial activism is still stuck at, due to decades of endless failure), needs to be designed so it has a very high probability of success.  While low risk/high reward is of course optimal, such scenarios are rare (short-term).  I would suggest frequent low risk/low reward activities to build up a tradition of success and a “habit of winning” (with as many low risk/moderate reward activities as are possible).  All those “low rewards” can build up into something substantial; constant small (net) gains are helpful. With such success achieved, consistently and reproducibly, moderate risk/moderate reward approaches can then be advanced.

I’d like to point out that while low risk/high reward activities are rare in the short-term, the ability to leverage risk to reward increases with a long-term time horizon.  Community-building and infrastructure-building activities can in the long run be high reward, but can be achieved with relatively low risk (or at least low-to-moderate risk) when performed slowly over time.  One needs to be patient.  Rome was not built in a day.  Not everything needs to be immediate gratification.

2. Avoid foolhardy activities; avoid like a plague those activities with a high probability of failure.  Most of all, avoid activities in which the reward is always lower than the risk – e.g., low to moderate rewards coupled to moderate to high risk. Unite the Right is a perfect example of a negative imbalance of risk to reward.

3. Eventually, when one builds up a sufficient “store-house” of success, one can spend some of that capital on calculated (not foolhardy) risks – activities with a high reward that may have moderate to high risk.  But these must be planned very carefully, and never should be “all or nothing.”

In all cases, risk mitigation should always be practiced and all reasonably conceivable contingencies planned for.

Postscript

Perhaps not surprisingly, Greg Johnson believes the embarrassing Unite the Right II fiasco was a “triumph”

To summarize his “argument” – Kessler and his merry little band “triggered” the dastardly Left into exposing their distorted selves to all the “normies.”  Sorry, I don’t buy it, Greg, and here is why.

Healthy-minded people already know the Left are hateful freaks.  That’s not the major issue.  The major issue is that normal people have either lost hope or they think that “voting Republican” solves the problem.  What the Far Right needs to do is:

1. Show that the Left is not invincible; they can be defeated.  Victory is possible, so the healthy masses should not give in to apathy or despair.

2. Demonstrate that the Far Right, and only the Far Right, is capable of defeating the Left.  The GOP, Trump, cuckservatives, civic nationalists, etc. cannot do so.  Only the Racial Right can provide victory.

What Quota Queen Kessler achieved with Unite the Right II is to strengthen the appearance of the power, inevitability, and invincibility of the Left, and the pathetic powerlessness, isolation, and “representing the dead past” sad aura of the Far Right.  Unite the Right II may have emphasized leftist freakishness, but that only serves to increase White despair, as the freaks emerged dominant and triumphant, while the Right scurried away, tail between their legs, protected by the police.

Unite the Right I was a disaster, but at least there the Far Right was represented by the System as a dangerously powerful – albeit sinister – force.  Unite the Right II just made pro-White racial activism look weak and pathetic. To paraphrase Saint Adolf: the masses are like women, they respect and crave (male) strength, and despise (male) weakness.

In summary: exposing the Left as deranged freaks does not weaken them.  They and their supporters – which includes the System apparatus – revel in the freakishness, which they consider “being on the right side of history.”  As stated above, healthy-minded “normies” already know what the Left is about, and are tired of seeing the Left always win and the Right always lose.  Standing up to the freaks with a show of strength, determination, numbers, and vigor would have been a success for the Far Right, breaking the Left’s aura of inevitability.  Even a “glorious defeat” – going down fighting – would have been something positive. But this?  This?  A tiny hapless group shepherded by police?  It was just another typical failed “movement” rally, no different from the endless parade of failure that has made American Nutzis into a laughingstock, a punching bag for the Left.  

And by the way Kessler and Johnson, the “Gandhian non-violent” movement in India engaged in mass passive resistance and civil disobedience, and they were not afraid to suffer attack by their opponents. They did not hide behind the police; they did not beg for help from the same System they wanted to overthrow.  If you want to be “Gandhian” then act “Gandhian” – not Rockwellian, which is more the truth of the matter.  I do not support the Gandhian approach, but if that’s your “grand new idea,” then at least be honest about it; be authentic.

Finally, I can’t help but think that if Kessler was a Spencer ally – or, even “worse,” if Spencer himself was involved in the action – then Johnson would be denouncing Unite the Right II as a failure.  But, alas, Kessler and Spencer had a falling out, so Kessler is “good” – blah, blah, blah.  Plus, there’s some solidarity among the quota crew (excepting the cases of major feuds) – it does no good if activists recognize Kessler as an affirmative action product – after all, if they recognize that, maybe others would be also recognized as such as well?  And we can’t have that!

Jason Kessler: Quota Queen Failure

These affirmative action bastards are killing our race.  They have got to go.

In all cases, emphasis added.

Another pathetic humiliation: the Tradition of Failure continues.

A white nationalist rally in the heart of Washington drew around 20 demonstrators and hundreds of chanting counterprotesters on Sunday, the one-year anniversary of racially charged violence in Charlottesville, Virginia.

 

Dan Haught, a 54-year-old computer programmer from Washington, was attending his first protest at the White House holding a sign that said “Back under your rocks you Nazi clowns.”

“We wanted to send a message to the world that we vastly outnumber them,” Haught said.

Gee, what a surprise!  It’s not like, you know, that’s ever happened before, right?  Seriously though, Der Movement really has this scenario worked out to perfection: rallies in which the racialists are greatly outnumbered by protesters and require police protection from the mass of protesters – exhibiting weakness and a hypocritical dependence on the System, and a comical lack of foresight and self-awareness.  EVERYONE knew – or had to know – that the “rally” would turn out like this.  Then why do it?

You know what?  Kessler is more the enemy than is Haught.  Much, much more.  It are guys like Kessler who are killing what could be a real movement and making it into a pathetic joke.  As long as The Quota Queens Inc. are the “leadership” of Der Movement Inc. (a money-making enterprise for the Tin Cuppers) nothing – absolutely nothing – will ever be achieved.

A handful of members of right wing, white supremacist and neo Nazi groups holding a Sunday rally near the White House were vastly outnumbered by massive crowds of counter protesters.

Dubbed “Unite the Right 2,” the white supremacist rally was organized by Jason Kessler…But Sunday’s rally did not draw the turnout Kessler might have envisioned, with only approximately 20 of his allies joining him. They traveled to the event on the Metro train from suburban Vienna, Va. Kessler’s group arrived in downtown D.C. at about 2:30 p.m. They were flanked by police as they walked a few blocks through downtown D.C. to the park, which is across the street from the White House. 

Large crowds of counter protesters encircled the group and tossed objects at them as they marched from the train. At the Lafayette Park, police kept Kessler and his followers far from the protesters, who had them surrounded. 

The counter protesters included members of a wide variety of groups including socialists and Black Lives Matter organizations. Maurice Cook, the co-founder of March For Racial Justice, which helped plan the count-protests, told Yahoo News turnout was “more than we expected.”

Greg Johnson: Jason Kessler is a likeable, sincere, and intelligent guy.

Ted Sallis: Jason Kessler is a moronic stupid bastard, an embarrassment whose all-too-easy-too-predict failures are killing American racial activism.

Who is right?  Who is wrong?

Consider that Johnson wrote:

The people at Unite the Right who were doxxed, injured, arrested, harassed, fired from their jobs, shunned by their families, and in one case driven to suicide had a lot of illusions stripped away from them. A lot of them are understandably bitter.

A huge number of people who attended and who watched the disaster from a distance simply disappeared from the movement.

After all of that, with Kessler planning a sequel to that (which turned out to be the tragicomedy described above), Johnson still writes “Jason Kessler is a likeable, sincere, and intelligent guy!!!!!!”  Oh, but he “can’t admit defeat” you see, that’s the problem.  No, the problem is that ALL these guys, the Kesslers and Johnsons and Spencers et al. HAVE NO ACCOUNTABILITY because their “leadership” positions are a result of a de facto affirmative action policy rather than on merit.

At the extreme end of the spectrum in having a lack of self-awareness, Greg Johnson edition:

There’s an animus in the movement against realism and honesty when it comes to our failures…

Yeah, Greg, like “banning” people from your blog when they honestly and realistically talk about your failures.  Der Movement Inc. is parody of itself.

But, hey, keep on supporting failure, all you Type I Nutzis out there.  Keep on supporting people because they have Anglo or Germanic surnames, keep on with the complete lack of accountability, keep on following “leaders” who comically make the same mistakes over and over and over again (while gibbering about “low Negro IQ” – while said Negroes are capable of organizing rallies that dwarf in size and success anything the quota queens have ever put together).

Another example of Type I retardation is here.

President Trump, who seems to have far less power over this country than do the media and technology conglomerates, must act forcefully to guarantee freedom of speech and to ensure that the objective rule of law is reestablished.

Hey, imbecile, Trump signed a document last year stating to use the resources of the federal government against the Right.  Jeff Sessions went out of his way to indict Fields on “hate crime charges” while praising Heyer.  Don’t you stupid bastards, with your pathetic lickspittle worship of the Big Mac-gobbling porn star-rawdogging turd Trump, understand yet?  HE DOES NOT CARE ABOUT YOU AND YOUR “RIGHTS.”  Trump’s daughter, who he listens to more than to losers like you:

…there is no place for white supremacy, racism and neo-nazism in our great country.

You DO know she’s a convert Jew with an ethnically Jewish husband don’t you?  

Hey, don’t you know that at Kessler’s failed DC rally, the Antifa were allowed to wear masks without fear of arrest?  Who knows?  Maybe if you stripped off one of those masks, you’d see this face staring back at you.

Remember: Donald Trump is President and Jeff Sessions is Attorney General. Wow, how lucky we are!  Imagine if Clinton had been elected – then right wingers would have been deplatformed and physically attacked in the streets with impunity.  Oh, wait…

All of this is not – as the juvenile Alt Righters would say – “blackpilling.” It is reality.  To quote one of your grand “leaders” – There’s an animus in the movement against realism and honesty when it comes to our failures…

Don’t blame the messenger for the message.  How about blaming yourselves instead?  YOU – look in the mirror now, Type I losers – keep on supporting idiots who fail time and again, YOU keep on supporting people who MAKE THE SAME GODDAMNED MISTAKES OVER AND OVER AGAIN, and YOU keep on enabling approaches that are guaranteed to fail even before they commence.  

YOU HAVE MET THE ENEMY AND IT IS YOU 

Live with it.