Category: Overman High Culture

6/8/17: Behold a Hypocrite

Nonsense from a certain weasel-faced hypocrite.

Christianity is the religion of the higher IQ, the more empathic, the bigger-souled, the guilt-based (inner morality); it’s a religion for a people whose impulse is to transcend their human failings and better themselves, rather than to embrace their will to filth and stamp a seal of approval on their avaricious barbarity.

You mean, like: rejecting hedonistic nihilism and promiscuous sex?  You mean like getting married to a woman of your own race and not miscegenating with Negresses with “gravity-defying asses” or with Asiatrixes with wandering fingers?  You mean like “love thy neighbor” as opposed to snarky “shiving?”  This Roissy has to rank among the most outrageous hypocrites on Earth.

Now of course there are exceptions…

Meet Jimmy Wideassmann.

I’m of the opinion that a religion is less an influence on culture and society than it is a manifest revelation of the genetic foundation of the people who profess belief in it.

Absolute nonsense.  

Regrettably, Christianity, like its people, has “out-evolved” itself — it evolved to where it was always logically heading…

So, if Christianity was “always logically heading” to self-destructive Universalist cucking then (1) what good is it?, and (2) what does that say about the “genetic foundation of the people who profess belief in it?”  If we’ve all “out-evolved” our adaptive instructs, what now?  Should we just lay with the aforementioned Negresses and Asiatrixes and leave saving society to “the anti-poolside chumps?”

Those who think the White West can be unyoked from Christianity and not just survive but thrive are fools…

That makes me a fool then.  Or maybe someone who believes we need to move on to the next High Culture.

Christianity can no more be excised from the West than charity, empathy, genius, poetry, and high trust can be cut out from Western societies without permanently altering the character of the people. Discarding Christianity is taking a hatchet to a part of the essence of European man and expecting him to walk off the operating table unchanged…

But, Jimmy, if Whites have evolved past adaptive fitness and are riding the Cuckstianity horse into genetic oblivion, maybe some operating table change is drastically needed?

My opinion: Christianity must be mercilessly destroyed.  Crush the infamy!

Der Movement in Der News, 5/2/17

Der Movement marches on.

Another rambling Costello piece.  Is the picture accompanying the piece that of Jef serving breakfast to the Goddess and Lioness Mudshark Annie?  That after she’s spent the night with Dinesh.

This Spencer piece was good until the end:


Trump seems unburdened by this political theology. This indicates that, despite his failings, he remains “uncucked” in his heart of hearts.

I was going to really blast that, but I see a commentator beat me to it:

Robert Bruce • 8 hours ago

Are you frigging kidding me? The guy says some nice words to placate the anti war paleoconservatives and alt right and his heart is “uncucked”? The guy talks out of both sides of his mouth!!!!!!! Please get real, and I would distance myself a tad from Trump. Haven’t you already hurt your cause by joining yourself at the hip with him in the beginning? No more brothers wars huh? It looks like his group sure wants to take out Russia in the not too distant future. Talk is cheap, very cheap. The guy’s main job is to keep everyone on edge and confused if he is the real deal or not, well he isn’t. His job is to implode the GOP. I am embarrassed that I felt compelled to vote for this guy. The article was very good, except the ending. You can’t really tell if this guy is sincere is my point.

This is a fundamental problem I have with the “movement” in general, and the Alt Right in particular: these guys never learn their lesion, and they have impaired judgment.  How many times do you need to be smacked in the face by betrayal by your Man on White Horse before you give up on it?  If some passing Trump rambling comments on the Civil War get you all worked up, I can quote Fat Don on denouncing “racism” and “anti-Semitism” and crying about the “Holocaust.”   Does this guy Trump really have a “heart of hearts?” I’m beginning to doubt it.  There’s no “there” there.  He’s an empty vessel, nowadays mostly being filled up by Neocon drivel.

I’m not surprised that a “libertarian” promotes this absolute nonsense.

Putting aside for the moment whether Christianity can serve as today as a vehicle for racial interests, we can ask whether it (or any other religion) can serve as a basis for modern society.  Are we really supposed to build a worldview on some Jewish myth about how Jaysus is going to save us, the “son of god” who rose from the dead?  Wen Nietzsche said “God is Dead” that was meant metaphorically, that belief in Christianity was lost in a modern, scientifically literate, technologically growing age.  Can educated people – ones who are not delusional of conformist cucks – really believe any of this nonsense?  Are we supposed to believe in Daddy Sky God (Yahweh or Odin or Zeus or whoever) and his son (Jesus or Thor or Hercules or whoever) and take any of this seriously. Or, like an Amren Christian promoter long ago, do we tell people that they need to go to church and feign belief?  That’s great – a society built on lies and fantasy that lots of people pretend they believe in.  That’s the foundation for long-term stability, I tell ya!

All of that could even be stomached in Christianity served EGI in today’s age, but it does not.  You cannot turn back the historical clock.  In today’s globalist age, a Universalist religion now includes, practically speaking, all of humanity.  And even if somehow you could turn the clock back and recreate a “muscular Christianity” is it worth the effort?  After all that struggle, you’ll end up with a fantasy that educated and rational people secretly mock in their hearts, a religion with an inner core of universalism that always contains the danger of getting cucked again, a religion that always has to be controlled to keep its universalist elements restrained.  How about just growing up, moving forward, and stop trying to revive dead aspects of a passing High Culture?  How about planting the seeds of a new High Culture?

And, personally, I see religious Whites as being mentally weak; unable to face realty as it is, they need comforting fantasies, and unable to act as morally independent adults, they need Big Daddy and his earthly priestly minions to provide guidance. That may be suitable for the unwashed masses, but I thought that “truth-telling” racialists were supposed to know better.

Greg is correct about “trans” here.  If someone has the delusion that they are Napoleon, the correct approach is to cure them of their delusion; you don’t send them put to fight the Battle of Waterloo.

Why Palingenesis is a Practical Necessity

Destroy and renew.
One school of “movement” “thought” is exemplified by the Amren/Hart crowd: keep things more or less as they are today, but with some racial reforms. Thus, we will continue to have a free market capitalist America, with all the economic-obsessed sociopolitical agendas that come with that, everything the same, but with enhanced racial homogeneity.  Other activists, more extreme, still foresee maintenance of the current cultural and social system, except that it will be “all White.”
My perspective is completely opposite.  I advocate a complete palingenetic rebirth of the West, the so-called Overman High Culture, I advocate – similar to the Romanian Legionaries – the creation of the New Man, a superior form of human that transcends selfish economic individualism, an optimized mental-physical-spiritual – ethical being.
And I clam that this is an absolute necessity – not only from the ideological and aesthetic standpoint, but also from the purely pragmatic standpoint.  And not only because the objectives we have will require such upheaval and sacrifice that only a revolutionary goal can serve as the foundation for our activity. But, also, and ultimately, because that any new state built on the old system is destined to fail.
A new state built upon selfish individualism, Economic Man, free market capitalism, etc. will inevitably degenerate into a plutocracy, as free-riding selfish individualists accrue more wealth, with which they will amass more power, with which they will redirect the state toward their own self-serving interests, which, historically speaking, has involved globalism, mass migration, cheap labor, allegiance toward transnational elites rather than one’s own countrymen, and a money-obsessed anti-heroic society unable and unwilling to actualize a High Culture and achieve racial and civilizational destiny.
Putting together an ad hoc set of laws and imposed customs to try to prevent the descent into plutocracy will not work.  How to balance the sort of reasonable economic incentives for productivity and excellence with the need to prevent gross inequalities and atomized individualism?  How to precisely balance those benefits of the free market with the organizational imperative of Yockey’s “Ethic Socialism?”  Forcing these disparate memes together in the context of a failed societal structure is a blueprint for disaster.
Only a New Man, operating in a New Society, built upon a foundation of radically national socialist Racial-Cultural Values, can properly balance these opposing forces, and have the INNATE desire to do the right thing, to serve the Race rather than be enslaved by the “almighty dollar.”  The superstructure of  new state and new society will be stable only when built upon the rock-solid foundation of a fresh, palingenetic, futurist, avante garde system of racial and civilizational ethics. Palingenesis is necessity. Continung failed memes and failed systems ensures failure.  Only the new can serve as the building blocks for the future.
All else is folly.

European Colonialism as the Empire of the West

Speculative interpretation.
As previously noted, I’m skeptical of the full Spengler/Yockey theory of cyclical history and highly specialized High Cultures (e.g., Classical and Western being completely unrelated) – particularly Pessimism and Inevitability (the basic problem with all memes of inevitability: if accepted, they become self-fulfilling and are therefore essentially tautological and unfalsifiable).
However, I do believe that Spengler and Yockey had a point with the very basic premise of cyclical High Cultures.  Let’s assume that Yockey’s interpretation of Spengler’s philosophy of history has merit.  We then run into a problem.  We are clearly in the Winter of the West, terminal decline.  What happened to the Fall season of the West, of Empire and Caeserism?  What happened to that Authoritarian Empire of the West promised and promoted by Imperium, that golden age that would precede Winter?
Yockey, I believe, miscalculated, perhaps due to an optimism inconsistent with his slavish adherence to Spenglerian Pessimism. Thus, by the time Yockey wrote Imperium, the Age of Empire was already over, and Winter was dawning.
What I am saying is this: the Empire of the West was nothing more or less than the age of European Colonialism, the European overseas colonies in Africa, Asia, and the Americas.  That’s it.  Done, finished, and over with, destroyed by the world wars.  Just as the French Revolution and Napoleon mark the dividing line between Culture and Civilization for the West, so do the World Wars and Hitler mark the dividing line between Empire and Winter.
It makes sense, really.  The West had long been compromised by petty nationalism and by the Spirit of Money.  Therefore, the Empire of the West was a pathetically haphazard series of colonial adventures, for the most part motivated by mercantilism and national rivalries.  Built on a house of cards, it all came to a swift and premature end, as that same petty nationalism and defense of commercial interests led to the England-Germany rivalry, two world wars, and the collapse of the West.  Poor Yockey, looking forward to an era that had actually recently ended.  Dreaming of an Empire of a United West, when the real Empire was the competition of the colonial offices of the nations of Western Europe.  Yockey, dreaming of an Age of Authority, when instead money and commercial interests ruled.
Well, it’s over.  We need to save the Peoples of the West, so these Peoples can begin the process of building a new High Culture on the foundation of the ruins of the West.  But to do so, we need to learn the lessons of the past.  Any idiots who think that the future can be built on the same petty nationalism which led to our downfall – these are indeed idiots, or perhaps traitors.
But, to summarize: Yockey’s expected Empire never took place because, if we accept the cyclical history that his views are based upon, then that Empire had already been actualized in the insipid form of the European overseas colonial system.  

Russia and Europe: The Putinista View

An important subject with no easy answers.
A certain blog has, in recent weeks, featured essays by a writer attacking the notion that Russians are “White.”  We are told that the Russian Identity is non-Western and anti-Western, non-European and anti-European, and that any Russians who are sincerely pro-White and consider themselves “White” (i.e., European) have to explicitly reject a specifically Russian identity.


“Russia must be viewed as a unique and original civilization that cannot be reduced to ‘East’ or ‘West,'” reads the document, signed by Deputy Culture Minister Vladimir Aristarkhov. “A concise way of formulating this stand would be, ‘Russia is not Europe,’ and that is confirmed by the entire history of the country and the people.”

Russia’s non-European path should be marked by “the rejection of such principles as multiculturalism and tolerance,” according to the draft. “No references to ‘creative freedom’ and ‘national originality’ can justify behavior considered unacceptable from the point of view of Russia’s traditional value system.” That, the document stresses, is not an infringement on basic freedoms but merely the withdrawal of government support from “projects imposing alien values on society.”

A rejection of multiculturalism and tolerance (not characteristics of the true West, but of its modern , deracinated degenerate form) would be good things, if they were actualized in policy. Unfortunately, Putin is a dedicated multiculturalist aiming at a mixed, Eurasian Russia.  Further, if Putin’s Russia was to truly follow the independent Third Rome path of a unique Russian High Culture, then there wouldn’t be this agenda to worship at the altar of Asia, and promote a “Eurasian Union.”
Well then, the Putinistas would argue that the “Eurasian Union” is just pragmatic politics.  Fine.  Let’s be pragmatic.   Let’s start by accepting the theoretical premise that Russia is neither East nor West, but its own “unique and original civilization.”  The problem is – pragmatically – Russia could actualize that “unique civilization” only if the nation had booming demographics, racial homogeneity and a commitment to maintain that homogeneity, as well as a robust civic culture that could maintain and promote Russian interests as an original, independent civilizational entity.
None of those attributes hold.  I’ll agree that Russian Identity is not Western (despite the fact that ethnic Russians are racially European), certainly not in the sense of those Western European nations Yockey identified as the West: Germany, England, France, Italy, Spain, etc.  And, not even Western in the sense of those westernizing (in a modern sense at least) ex-Warsaw Pact nations of Eastern Europe.  We can agree on this.
But, again, pragmatically, Russia doesn’t seem to have the stamina and bright demographic/racial future to make it alone.  I do think that eventually Russia needs to choose between West vs. East.  Here, West = the true West, what was, and what could be in the future with a new High Culture.  As a nation that was a pioneer of space exploration, as a people that are racially European, the Russians can be partners in building the Overman High Culture.  Therein, their existence would be secure – and the unique aspects of the Russian civilization can exist alongside that of the traditional Western, as a whole greater than the sum of the parts.
But if Russia chooses East, then Russia is doomed, and the Russians are doomed.  They’ll be swallowed up by the Yellow and Brown tides of color.
A choice needs to be made.  West or East.  Survival or Death.