Category: Paris

Bring More of Them In

My prediction about the Paris attacks will come true.
Instead of ridiculing Derbyshire as usual, I’ll just link to his post, which reveals what we all know to be true: after every Muslim terrorist attack in the West, the reaction of the West has been to increase Muslim immigration. In the long run, count on that happening after Paris as well.
The White race: the most pathetic, weak, useless, flabby, inferior, tragicomic, contemptible, disgusting, maladaptive, and unfit form of life in the multiverse. The White race: an embarrassment. The White race: a bad joke in the annals of biological fitness.

Who Do You Trust?

Two views.

Shitlibs: “The terrorists are the people who the refugees are fleeing.”

Sallis: “The terrorists are the people who the refugees ARE.”

Remembering the passport found indicating entry through Greece, reading this and also reading this, who do you trust?  I put my money on this Sallis guy.

The Grand Bargain

Making a deal.

What is one fundamental purpose of terrorism/guerrilla warfare?  It is to provoke the opposing government, to provoke repressive measures, repression that will harm and radicalize the population you want to recruit, and thus encourage them to hate that government and join your cause.  This plays on human nature in which anger tends to be focused on the most immediate cause of distress: thus, instead of blaming the terrorists for causing the problem to begin with, the subject population harbors animus to the government reacting to the terrorism. Of course, this focus of anger is easier to generate when the terrorists and the relevant subject population are of a different ethnic-racial-cultural background than are most of those running the government. Other strategic considerations exist for terrorism; for example, to make the people lose confidence in the ability of the government to defend them and to provide basic services (which of course includes security) and to “tire out” the government and population so that they will give in to some of the terrorists’ demands.  But, again, a major overarching objective is to provoke repression and thus anger the subject population.
This is why, in reaction to Paris, the multiculturalist globalists tell us: “Europe must not turn against its Muslim population, must not shun them, harass them, suspect them, or stop immigration and refugees – because that is what the terrorists want us to do.”
Well, in a sense they are right: that is indeed part of the terrorists’ grand strategy. Their overarching goal is to create their caliphate, their state, and to get as many Muslims as possible to join it. Therefore, their grand strategy includes tactics to radicalize Muslims, and to prevent Muslims, particularly those living in the West, to assimilate into the degenerate Western culture (and make no mistake, the West is degenerate: with bearded men singers dressed as women or transsexual ex-Olympians championed as the icons of the culture, and having gay marriage, transgenderism, feminism, and “Black Lives Matter” as the major social concerns).  They want to drive a wedge between native European populations and the immigrant communities, they want to create distrust, disunity, balkanization, and radicalization on both sides. So, yes, the liberals are correct: that is what the terrorists want.
But is any of that bad?  Actually, it sounds like a good start, what White racial nationalists want. Of course, we reject and oppose the methods used. Our blood boils in anger to see our folk attacked in Paris (by those our folk welcomed with open arms, coddled, and gave preferences to over themselves), and by the limp-wristed reaction of European elites. Of course we oppose and reject the tactics. But that is not the issue here. The issue here is simply: do we agree or disagree with the objective?  Which do we prefer – the attitude of a Hollande or a Merkel that we should embrace the newcomers, assimilate them, let them replace us demographically, and have “unity” with them, OR do we prefer the attitude of the other side, that wants the immigrant communities to segregate themselves from Europeans, to reject Western culture, and, ultimately, to go to the Middle East to fight to establish whatever type of state these radicals want?
This is the tragedy of having globalists in charge. Salterian Universal Nationalists would be able to find common ground with radicals from other civilizations, and strike a Grand Bargain with them.
Thus, a nationalist West would go to Islam, China, Africa, India, Latin America et al. and say: 
“We understand that you reject Western cultural and economic hegemony. You don’t want us and our alien ways around. We understand. You don’t want our ships off your coasts, you don’t want our planes and drones and missiles bombarding you, you don’t want to be controlled by the Dollar (or the Euro), you don’t want your young influenced by our cultural and social norms. And you are right to feel this way. Western globalists were wrong and you are right.

Therefore, we agree to leave your lands, to stop Western cultural, economic, social, and military imperialism. We will let you have control over your own lands, your own cultures, and your own destinies. You can form whatever societies and economies you wish, with no interference whatsoever from us. And, yes, we will stop supporting Israel as well.
However, in exchange, we require the same from you: no interference with our lands, our culture, and our destiny. We want you to accept all of your co-ethnics currently living in the West, we will repatriate them all back to you, regardless of their place of birth or citizenship. Let this divorce be final, let us divide up the Earth and its peoples between us. Let the West be the West, let China be China, let Islam be Islam, let Africa be Africa, let Latin America be Latin America, let India be India. To each his own, and for themselves alone.”
Thus, the Grand Bargain: non-interference of the West to the Rest and an end to the cultural conquest of the Rest by the West, coupled with an end to the Rest trying to conquer the West through immigration and demographics.

Sounds fair. The only problem is that we need nationalists in charge of the West to broker this deal.  Can it happen and do we have the time?

Another Demented Turd

Also responsible for Paris.

The discovery of the passport has raised fears that some of the assailants might have entered Europe as part of the huge influx of people fleeing Syria’s civil war. But Mouzalas insisted that heightened security concerns should not jeopardise the rights of refugees to safety in Europe.

In other words, the “rights” of aliens count more than the rights of your own people. The “right” of “refugees” to invade other peoples’ nations is more important than the right of natives for self-preservation.  Is this creature Mouzalas serious?  Who is this demented animal?

“There could be more (such jihadists)… are we supposed to toss 100,000 people in the sea?” he asked.

Yes, exactly, If necessary, toss them in the sea. They can go elsewhere. This is madness. Someone shows up uninvited, you take them in, they attack you, and your response is to worry about them, and to wish more like them to come in. How about worrying about your own citizens, you stupid bastard?

“Greece and Europe must keep a very fine balance between security and human rights,” he said.

How about the “human rights” of Europeans?  Or are they “non-people” with no rights?

“Most of (the attackers) were born and raised in Western countries… they leave Western countries with legal Western passports, go to jihad and return.”

They were born and raised in Western countries, because scum like Mouzalas let in their parents and grandparents. Now he wants to let in more. So, when the sons and grandsons of the “refugees” commit acts against what few remaining European exist in one or two generations hence, future shitlibs will throw up their hands and say, “they were born and raised here, that doesn’t reflect on the latest batch of a million NEC filth invaders who want to come here.”
I stand by my prediction: the response of Europe to the Paris atrocity will be more immigration, more Muslims, more surrender, more groveling. All Whites are subhuman cowards, including those “outside the Hajnal line.”  The “White Man’s Disease” knows no boundaries.

Juncker: A Bipedal Pile of Shit

Meet Jean-Claude Juncker.

“Those who organized these attacks, and those who carried them out, are exactly those who the refugees are fleeing,” European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker told reporters at the G-20 summit in Turkey. “There is no need to revise the European Union’s entire refugee policy.”


Juncker, like Merkel, must be one of the most incredibly evil piles of dung in human history. Let me slightly rewrite his screed to be more accurate:


“Those who organized these attacks, and those who carried them out, are exactly those who the refugees are,” European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker told reporters at the G-20 summit in Turkey. “There is every need to revise the European Union’s entire refugee policy.”


A case can be made that Merkel and Juncker are in part responsible for the murder of the French citizens in Paris. They should be captured by French commandos and put on trial for murder.

Strom on Paris

Another defeat for a dying people.
Whites are an inferior, biologically unfit, maladaptive, wasted race –  a tired race, a dying race, a useless race. 
Superiority is not anyone’s birthright: superiority has to be earned.  Fitness is not bestowed on any people, it must be earned, it must be won through struggle, it must be wrested from nature through trials of blood and iron. Those peoples up to the challenge will survive. Those effete and exhausted peoples not up to the challenge, who shrink from confrontation and war, will perish.
Powell was right: there will be rivers of blood. The only question is: whose blood?

Questions for Vox-Type Shitlibs

“That’s what they are running from.”
The typical “shitlib” response to the Paris massacre is to say: “This means we should be more, not less, welcoming to the Syrian refugees, since this is what they are running from.”
In response, I have some questions for the shitlibs based on that quoted assertion:
1. Why is anyone obligated to help these refugees?
2. If true, they are running from a man-made problem, not a natural disaster. It is a problem made by their own people and their own culture. Aren’t they just going to recreate the problem wherever they go?  Isn’t this analogous to people fleeing a plague region and bringing the disease with them, to infect new populations?
3. How do you know that there are none of the terrorists mixed in with the refugees?  How do you know that some of these refugees – most of whom are aggressive young men – won’t later become criminals and terrorists in their new home, once they find aspects of that new home that do not suit them?
4. How come so many of the refugees are young men?  Does that make sense?  Why are so many from countries other than Syria? From countries with no civil war or terrorism problems?
5. If true, why do the refugees insist on coming to Europe?  Why particularly to the richer nations of Northwest Europe?  Why don’t they go to nations closer to home that do not have the “terrorist problem” that they are “running from?”  Why not go to other Muslim nations?  Why not go to Israel? Will the shitlibs start pressuring Israel to take in large numbers of refugees, particularly those rowdy crowds of young men?
6. Why are the refugees so aggressive, complaining about their hosts, and demanding of their hosts? Shouldn’t they be grateful to “escape from the terror?”
7. Will the refugees go home if and when the terrorists are defeated?
8. Aren’t you being the lowest form of mendacious scum when you state: “The terrorists don’t have to be foreigners, they can be native-born citizens,” when those “native-born citizens” are themselves the alien offspring of previous waves of invading immigrants and refugees?
9. You and your kind have been pushing the West to accept the alien influx for decades.  How has it worked out?  Isn’t the Paris massacre, and Charlie Hebdo, and Rotherham the end result of past instances of shitlib-promoted welcoming of “the other?”  Why should we listen to you again this time?
10. Even if what you say is true, and even if the newcomers were peaceful and sincere, don’t the peoples of the West have an obligation to themselves and their posterity to preserve their ethny and culture and to prevent their people and nation from being demographically and culturally replaced? Shouldn’t the peoples of the West care about their own children and grandchildren more than the teeming hordes who greedily grasp for expansion into the homelands of other peoples?

Update: One of the terrorists may have been a “Syrian refugee.” While I hate to be vulgar on this blog, sometimes it is necessary: Dear Vox shitlibs, go fuck yourselves.