Category: Pat Buchanan

Der Movement: 10/13/17

Der Movement roundup.

Fascinating how Der Movement is obsessed with Evola (I’m unimpressed with his work myself; as a scientific empiricist, I find Evola’s  writings the worst form of subjective gibbering nonsense), yet are, in general, filled with a loathing and contemptuous disdain for the people from whence Evola sprang.  It’s ironic, as I suspect that Evola’s “spiritual race” stupidity was a sort of “memetic allergic response” to those sorts of attitudes.

Buchanan is more right than he knows.  Man on white horse syndrome, style over substance, betrayal, talk of amnesty – a heir indeed!

It seems unlikely that Marantz will offer either a retraction or offer sufficiently credible supporting evidence for his assertion.  Further, as I have previously asserted, anyone who uses the term “White supremacist” to describe White nationalists is being intellectually dishonest. MacDonald is not the only one who has a potential justification for a libel suit – Enoch has as well, if he can demonstrate that his views are nationalist and not supremacist.

I also find Marantz’s reply to MacDonald fascinating. When leftists contact Far Right leaders, digging around for more information for future “hit pieces,” it’s almost as if they are writing off of the same script; they all sound exactly the same: cheerful insouciance, bright-eyed innocence, insults couched in ostensibly friendly language, and, always, “I really want to know you better, I’m so very much genuinely interested in hearing your side.”  Emphasis added:

Hi Prof. MacDonald, as you’ll see in the piece, I bought your book and have read much of it, and I don’t think I characterized it unfairly. I have also read your many replies to your critics, here (http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/tooby&pinker.htm …) and elsewhere, and I understand your rejoinders (that Pinker never finished the book, that Tooby takes too narrow a view of genetic variation and adaptation, etc.)—and yet I don’t think it’s unfair to say that CofC was roundly debunked by mainstream social scientists. First, I think it’s fair to say that Pinker debunked the book even though he didn’t finish reading it. Whether it’s fair to debunk a set of arguments without engaging with them fully is another matter, but it is what he did, as did many others, not limited to Tooby. Of course, as you know, on your site you tend to emphasize the positive reviews of your book (by Derbyshire, Gottfried, etc.) but there are, of course, many negative ones as well, many of which are by mainstream social scientists (Jefferson Singer, John Hartung, etc). Again, not all of these took the form of published papers, but they were “debunkings” nonetheless. Your work is obviously influential in certain circles, and I would love to talk to you about it sometime—I am genuinely interested in it, and I think you’d find me a fair interview—but it’s just a fact that the mainstream has largely rejected your arguments. Moreover, it’s a fact I’ve seen you acknowledge (and complain about) fairly often…

In any case, MacDonald’s work on the Jews has NOT been “debunked.”  It has merely been criticized.  Whether or not you agree or disagree with that criticism (I disagree) is one thing, it’s another to falsely claim that this criticism has been so definitive (and unanswerable) so as to constitute “debunking.”  This all shows what a sorry state media writing has fallen to – it’s all political propaganda, without substantive, objectively useful, content.

Advertisements

Rotten Orange and Silk Road News

In the news.

Not just Muslims.  It’s the forever war against Asians, Jews, NECs, and White leftists. One of the terrorists was a “British Asian” by the way.

The Deep State revealed. Not much of a winner. That’s who has a “top-secret security clearance” in today’s America.  

I don’t know what’s less surprising – that “America’s senator” Sessions is overmatched in his new role, or that Trump is angry at his only cabinet pick that was satisfactory to the Alt Right.  We are witnessing apolitical train wreck of unprecedented proportions. And according to the gamesters, wasn’t “Sessions as Attorney General” by itself “worth having Trump elected?”  

Rotten Orange News: More Betrayal

More betrayal.

Is Roissy choking on his “white pills” yet?

More immigration!  More “high skilled” immigrants so American professionals can be displaced, and American IT workers can train their brownster replacements.

That’s yet another reason it’s laughable when the Trump fanboys pretend the only issue of concern in Syria.  The buffoon Trump is essentially reneging on his entire campaign.  What’s next: support for the “gang of eight” amnesty bill?  That we need to “build bridges, not walls?”

To summarize the problem crudely: Whites thought they were voting for Pat Buchanan but got Lindsey Graham instead.

Yes, and talk of “geostrategy” to support Trump’s foreign policy cucking can cut both ways. Let’s say that our “geostrategy” lies in a grand alliance with Russia against militant Islam to the south and China to the east.  Dem Russkis gots lots of oil too!  And think of all the arms sales we can have with China’s Asian neighbors arming them against Chicom aggression. Wow, it’s a win, win!

The Two Faces of Trump

The buffoon and the victim.

First, let’s take a look at what Spencer has to say about the floundering moron Touchback Trump (emphasis added):

The fact that Trump allowed himself to be tricked into supporting the current healthcare proposal reveals his own naiveté and reminds us, once again, that the Beltway advisors who have surrounded him are objectively bad at politics. Rather than focus on immigration—the issue that defined his candidacy—Trump got sucked into a whirlpool of regulations, arcane policies, climate-change debates, and taxes. This is a shocking waste of political capital, and it is not why his supporters put him in office.
Looking beyond the hysteria of the past two months, if Marco Rubio or Jeb Bush had won the presidency instead Trump, each wouldn’t have acted much differently in terms of policy, aside from the “Muslim bans,” which weren’t actually Muslim bans and have been tossed out anyway. Trump’s fights with the media are hilarious—and serve the strategic purpose of delegitimizing these old-line institutions and the Left as a whole—but they do little in terms of concrete change.
More important, the substance of Trump’s healthcare plan is a fucking joke. What Trump partisans call “Ryancare” or “Obamacare 2.0”—but which everyone else calls “Trumpcare”—will increase costs on Trump’s core constituency of White working-class voters, as even Breitbart points out.

The “movement’s” Man on White Horse fetish is collapsing once again as it always does.   I’ve been consistent on Trump.  Thus:

1. I supported Trump and his candidacy because I saw Trumpism as opening the field to right-wing populism and therefore stretching the scope of American politics in ways amenable to racial nationalist ideas and also promoting racial chaos and balkanization.  I also approved of Trump’s overall foreign policy worldview: pro-Russian and anti-Chinese.

2. I have always considered Trump as an ignorant vulgar buffoon, Negrophilic, Jew-connected, superficial, lacking in an understating of priorities, a juvenile jackass who believes that half-assed tweets can substitute for mature leadership and the pursuit of long-term objectives.

But the “movement” with its Pepe-Kek lulzing and “Trump is the last chance for White America” delusional “thinking” worship the buffoon.

Next, we’ll look at what Pat Buchanan has to say about the Deep State conspiracy against King Tweet:

The Obamaites seeded the U.S. and allied intel communities with IEDs to be detonated on Trump’s arrival. This is the scandal, not Trump telling Vlad to go find Hillary’s 30,000 missing emails.
We need to know who colluded with the Russians, if anyone did. But more critically, we need to unearth the Deep State conspiracy to sabotage a presidency.
So far, the Russia-connection investigation has proven a dry hole. But an investigation into who in the FBI, CIA or NSA is unmasking U.S. citizens and criminally leaking information to a Trump-hating press to destroy a president they are sworn to serve could prove to be a gusher.
As for the reports of Lynch-White House involvement in this unfolding plot to damage and destroy Trump the real question is: What did Barack Obama know, and when did he know it?

Herein is the problem: having tied themselves to Trump, the “movement” finds itself having to defend this clueless buffoon from an anti-White System that believes by attacking Trump they harm the Whites these globalists hate so much.

Der Movement is Disheartening and Demoralizing

Der Movement on perfect display.

While I do not want to criticize for the sake of criticism, I’m not going to be silent when Der Movement conducts itself in its typically embarrassingly stupid and predictably fetishistic manner.

For example, let’s take the latest example of why Der Movement disgusts me.  When Trump picked Gorsuch for the Supreme Court, the typical “movement” reaction was that as demonstrated here (*) – a real American! Triumph of the WASPs!  Just look at him!  Look at his family! The American archetype!  These guys are so predictable in their comments it is if they are reading off of a pre-prepared script.  Same old, same old…over and over again.

In his predictable homoerotic fashion, Roissy started heavy breathing about Gorsuch’s alpha maleness and his erect posture (contrasted against even the God Emperor, who “slouches at the neck” because of his “age and heavy frame” – a polite way of saying that Der Touchback is old and fat).

Well, that’s all great, except that, again predictably and typically, Gorsuch has started cucking even before being confirmed.

Senators from both sides of the aisle, including Sens. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) and Ben Sasse (R-NE), have confirmed that Judge Neil Gorsuch said something along the lines of Trump’s comments about a member of the judiciary were “disheartening” and “demoralizing.”

Pat Buchanan, with all his faults, at least has the honesty to speak some truths (emphasis added):

What a wimp. Did our future justice break down crying like Sen. Chuck Schumer? Sorry, this is not Antonin Scalia. 

Yes, this is not Scalia.  He may well be Earl Warren though, who was, no doubt, another real American.

From my perspective, what I want from a Supreme Court Justice is that he (yes, he – not she) be a European-American (of whatever ethnicity) and at least an implicitly White hard conservative (as much as we can expect now).  If that’s a WASP, great.  If it’s a wop, mick, hunkie, frog, squarehead that’s great too.

Now, from past experience I know that without any clarification (or even with it), my words here will be misused and misinterpreted by Nutzis and fetishists.  So, I’ll say the obvious. Yes, there should be significant representation of founding stock Americans on the Supreme Court.  Yes, the current lack of such representation is a legitimate concern.  Yes, individuals of founding stock ancestry (which I assume both Griffin and Spencer are) should expect ethnic representation.  But that’s not exactly what’s going on here.  Instead, we’re seeing breathless ecstasy solely based on Gorsuch’s background, independent of impacts on White racial interests, and disregarding the warning signs of cuckiness even before Gorsuch’s whining complaints.  And so we see nitwits like Roissy and Derbyshire having second thoughts now, in their post-orgasmic refractory period, both considering the possibility that the alpha-WASP Gorsuch might just be more Lindsey Graham and less Donald Trump.

It is an example of several underlying “movement” problems – the lack of judgment, the rush to embrace Men on White Horse heroes, the affirmative action program, the script-like dogma, etc. There’s no original thinking here. There’s no prudent “wait and see” calculation.  

Of relevance is this article, particularly this quote:

The hard Left has an effective infrastructure. The hard Right is looking to build one.

That’s relevant to the Gorsuch situation because it reflects the same underlying problem. Now, the author of that piece suggests that the advantage of the Left is the legacy of communism and the support given the American Communist Party by the USSR, which created sufficient subversive infrastructure that has been handed down from one generation of leftists to another.  That’s almost as much as an “Occam’s Butterknife” explanation as Roissy’s stupidity about “geography.”  Pleasureman at MPC was more accurate in ascribing the Strong Left vs. Weak Right paradigm to the character flaws of rightists.

Let’s look at the Far Right, shall we?  Revilo Oliver talking about 50 years of ‘movement” failure…in 1969.  One failed project after another…the Klan, Silver Shirts and the Bund, the John Birch Society, followed by various Nutzi antics.  How much money and effort was expended on Pierce and his National Alliance?  Apart from supporting Pierce in his mountaintop serial monogamy with Eastern European women, how did that work out?  How about all the money and effort expended on Duke (casino profits notwithstanding)?  The Right is “looking to build” an infrastructure after endless decades of money and hard work poured out to various quota queens. Yeah, the Left is successful – they have serious, hate-filled, high-IQ Jewboys coupled with the pick of dedicated self-hating White gentiles, and the best of the pick of wherever other racial flotsam and jetsam exist.  The Right on the other hand practices its strict affirmative action programs leading to pathetically incompetent “leadership” that has squandered millions of dollars and continues to do so.  How many millions of dollars have gone to the “happy penguins” over the past decade for example?

White nationalists cannot have such an infrastructure, but Black nationalists, deriving from a race derided as “inferior” by WNs, have indeed developed a reasonable degree of infrastructure. If we consider a people lower on the racial hierarchy than are the Negroes – the wops – we see another example. Low-IQ Afrowop dagoes came to America and established a highly organized criminal enterprise with an integrated infrastructure involving violent coercion (**).  But WNs can’t do it. The “hard Right” in general – with its decades of support and millions of dollars or largesse – cannot do it. These are all direct consequences of the failure of “movement” memes and policies.

On a perhaps not unrelated note, I’m always amused by Der Movement’s interest in Julius Evola (whose work is to me mostly the worst sort of moronic nonsense imaginable).  This breathless pro-Evolaism, coupled to Der Movement’s typical dogma and fetishes represents an extreme case of compartmentalization, cognitive dissonance, or both.  Or perhaps they really do think Evola was a bearded Amish man?

*That coming, ironically enough, from a website/groupuscule that has chosen for tis intellectual linchpin a half-Iranian who babbles NECist historical revisionism and fruitcake pseudoscience.  You can’t make this stuff up.  It’s comedy gold.

**Which has to a large part collapsed because of the assimilation that Der Movement denies exists (imagine if Scalia were a mafia don instead of a Supreme Court Justice, he would have made a formidable criminal mastermind) and the RICO laws (which Trump/Sessions should now use against the Left – we’re waiting).

Irish Readers and Other Items

Several items.

Over the past few days, we’ve had here (Note: this refers to the Blogger version of the blog, not the WordPress one here) quite a few page views from the Emerald Isle, and I welcome our Irish readers.  I hope you derive utility from this blog.

Racial nationalism in Ireland seems at an earlier stage of development compared to most other Western European nations, as well as in the USA, and in the long run, that is a good thing, as that allows Irish activists to get things on a correct footing at the beginning, and avoid pitfalls, such as that which has impeded the American “movement” (including in America, ironically enough, hostility toward the Irish and Irish-Americans).

I would suggest taking a close look at the work of Dr. Frank Salter on ethnic genetic interests, and to carefully consider the basic tenets described here.

Koreans, contra the heavy-breathing HBDers, are not quite along the road the self-destruction as has been described by those frosty individuals who value East Asians over Europeans.  Speaking of Asia-fanatics, the top photo accompanying the article is as good a visual description for the real derivation of Silk Road White nationalism as any other.  Got to get the Korean girls, as well as the Chinese ones, as border guards for the West, eh?

Buchanan, possibly getting mentally feeble in his old age, confuses the multiculturalist Putin with an ethnonationalist.  Hey, Patrick, there’s a difference between “Russian speakers” and “Russians.”  It’s the difference between civic nationalist multiculturalism and authentic ethnonationalism.

Der Movement in the (der) News, 9/16/16

Two items.


Is Putin’s Russia more repressive than Xi Jinping’s China?
Yet, Republicans rarely use “thug” when speaking about Xi.

Er…Xi is a Holy Oriental, a HBD God that walketh the Earth. Putin is just some dumb Slav. Come now, there’s a big difference! Even the GOP Establishment worships at the Altar of Asia, and why not? What’s the difference between a Derbyshire and a McCain, politically-wise?

Fine. How does Israel regard Putin “the thug” and Putin “the butcher”?

According to foreign policy scholar Stephen Sniegoski, when Putin first visited Israel in 2005, President Moshe Katsav hailed him as a “friend of Israel” and Ariel Sharon said he was “among brothers.”
In the last year alone, Bibi Netanyahu has gone to Moscow three times and Putin has visited Israel. The two get along wonderfully well.

Hey! That’s part of Putin’s “deep chess game!” He’s really an Alt-Right Traditionalist Anti-Semite, and don’t you ever think different!
Prayers, schmayers. More important: What was his cephalic index? Praetorian Guard, break out your calipers!