Category: Pat Buchanan

Der Movement is Disheartening and Demoralizing

Der Movement on perfect display.

While I do not want to criticize for the sake of criticism, I’m not going to be silent when Der Movement conducts itself in its typically embarrassingly stupid and predictably fetishistic manner.

For example, let’s take the latest example of why Der Movement disgusts me.  When Trump picked Gorsuch for the Supreme Court, the typical “movement” reaction was that as demonstrated here (*) – a real American! Triumph of the WASPs!  Just look at him!  Look at his family! The American archetype!  These guys are so predictable in their comments it is if they are reading off of a pre-prepared script.  Same old, same old…over and over again.

In his predictable homoerotic fashion, Roissy started heavy breathing about Gorsuch’s alpha maleness and his erect posture (contrasted against even the God Emperor, who “slouches at the neck” because of his “age and heavy frame” – a polite way of saying that Der Touchback is old and fat).

Well, that’s all great, except that, again predictably and typically, Gorsuch has started cucking even before being confirmed.

Senators from both sides of the aisle, including Sens. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) and Ben Sasse (R-NE), have confirmed that Judge Neil Gorsuch said something along the lines of Trump’s comments about a member of the judiciary were “disheartening” and “demoralizing.”

Pat Buchanan, with all his faults, at least has the honesty to speak some truths (emphasis added):

What a wimp. Did our future justice break down crying like Sen. Chuck Schumer? Sorry, this is not Antonin Scalia. 

Yes, this is not Scalia.  He may well be Earl Warren though, who was, no doubt, another real American.

From my perspective, what I want from a Supreme Court Justice is that he (yes, he – not she) be a European-American (of whatever ethnicity) and at least an implicitly White hard conservative (as much as we can expect now).  If that’s a WASP, great.  If it’s a wop, mick, hunkie, frog, squarehead that’s great too.

Now, from past experience I know that without any clarification (or even with it), my words here will be misused and misinterpreted by Nutzis and fetishists.  So, I’ll say the obvious. Yes, there should be significant representation of founding stock Americans on the Supreme Court.  Yes, the current lack of such representation is a legitimate concern.  Yes, individuals of founding stock ancestry (which I assume both Griffin and Spencer are) should expect ethnic representation.  But that’s not exactly what’s going on here.  Instead, we’re seeing breathless ecstasy solely based on Gorsuch’s background, independent of impacts on White racial interests, and disregarding the warning signs of cuckiness even before Gorsuch’s whining complaints.  And so we see nitwits like Roissy and Derbyshire having second thoughts now, in their post-orgasmic refractory period, both considering the possibility that the alpha-WASP Gorsuch might just be more Lindsey Graham and less Donald Trump.

It is an example of several underlying “movement” problems – the lack of judgment, the rush to embrace Men on White Horse heroes, the affirmative action program, the script-like dogma, etc. There’s no original thinking here. There’s no prudent “wait and see” calculation.  

Of relevance is this article, particularly this quote:

The hard Left has an effective infrastructure. The hard Right is looking to build one.

That’s relevant to the Gorsuch situation because it reflects the same underlying problem. Now, the author of that piece suggests that the advantage of the Left is the legacy of communism and the support given the American Communist Party by the USSR, which created sufficient subversive infrastructure that has been handed down from one generation of leftists to another.  That’s almost as much as an “Occam’s Butterknife” explanation as Roissy’s stupidity about “geography.”  Pleasureman at MPC was more accurate in ascribing the Strong Left vs. Weak Right paradigm to the character flaws of rightists.

Let’s look at the Far Right, shall we?  Revilo Oliver talking about 50 years of ‘movement” failure…in 1969.  One failed project after another…the Klan, Silver Shirts and the Bund, the John Birch Society, followed by various Nutzi antics.  How much money and effort was expended on Pierce and his National Alliance?  Apart from supporting Pierce in his mountaintop serial monogamy with Eastern European women, how did that work out?  How about all the money and effort expended on Duke (casino profits notwithstanding)?  The Right is “looking to build” an infrastructure after endless decades of money and hard work poured out to various quota queens. Yeah, the Left is successful – they have serious, hate-filled, high-IQ Jewboys coupled with the pick of dedicated self-hating White gentiles, and the best of the pick of wherever other racial flotsam and jetsam exist.  The Right on the other hand practices its strict affirmative action programs leading to pathetically incompetent “leadership” that has squandered millions of dollars and continues to do so.  How many millions of dollars have gone to the “happy penguins” over the past decade for example?

White nationalists cannot have such an infrastructure, but Black nationalists, deriving from a race derided as “inferior” by WNs, have indeed developed a reasonable degree of infrastructure. If we consider a people lower on the racial hierarchy than are the Negroes – the wops – we see another example. Low-IQ Afrowop dagoes came to America and established a highly organized criminal enterprise with an integrated infrastructure involving violent coercion (**).  But WNs can’t do it. The “hard Right” in general – with its decades of support and millions of dollars or largesse – cannot do it. These are all direct consequences of the failure of “movement” memes and policies.

On a perhaps not unrelated note, I’m always amused by Der Movement’s interest in Julius Evola (whose work is to me mostly the worst sort of moronic nonsense imaginable).  This breathless pro-Evolaism, coupled to Der Movement’s typical dogma and fetishes represents an extreme case of compartmentalization, cognitive dissonance, or both.  Or perhaps they really do think Evola was a bearded Amish man?

*That coming, ironically enough, from a website/groupuscule that has chosen for tis intellectual linchpin a half-Iranian who babbles NECist historical revisionism and fruitcake pseudoscience.  You can’t make this stuff up.  It’s comedy gold.

**Which has to a large part collapsed because of the assimilation that Der Movement denies exists (imagine if Scalia were a mafia don instead of a Supreme Court Justice, he would have made a formidable criminal mastermind) and the RICO laws (which Trump/Sessions should now use against the Left – we’re waiting).

Advertisements

Irish Readers and Other Items

Several items.

Over the past few days, we’ve had here (Note: this refers to the Blogger version of the blog, not the WordPress one here) quite a few page views from the Emerald Isle, and I welcome our Irish readers.  I hope you derive utility from this blog.

Racial nationalism in Ireland seems at an earlier stage of development compared to most other Western European nations, as well as in the USA, and in the long run, that is a good thing, as that allows Irish activists to get things on a correct footing at the beginning, and avoid pitfalls, such as that which has impeded the American “movement” (including in America, ironically enough, hostility toward the Irish and Irish-Americans).

I would suggest taking a close look at the work of Dr. Frank Salter on ethnic genetic interests, and to carefully consider the basic tenets described here.

Koreans, contra the heavy-breathing HBDers, are not quite along the road the self-destruction as has been described by those frosty individuals who value East Asians over Europeans.  Speaking of Asia-fanatics, the top photo accompanying the article is as good a visual description for the real derivation of Silk Road White nationalism as any other.  Got to get the Korean girls, as well as the Chinese ones, as border guards for the West, eh?

Buchanan, possibly getting mentally feeble in his old age, confuses the multiculturalist Putin with an ethnonationalist.  Hey, Patrick, there’s a difference between “Russian speakers” and “Russians.”  It’s the difference between civic nationalist multiculturalism and authentic ethnonationalism.

Der Movement in the (der) News, 9/16/16

Two items.


Is Putin’s Russia more repressive than Xi Jinping’s China?
Yet, Republicans rarely use “thug” when speaking about Xi.

Er…Xi is a Holy Oriental, a HBD God that walketh the Earth. Putin is just some dumb Slav. Come now, there’s a big difference! Even the GOP Establishment worships at the Altar of Asia, and why not? What’s the difference between a Derbyshire and a McCain, politically-wise?

Fine. How does Israel regard Putin “the thug” and Putin “the butcher”?

According to foreign policy scholar Stephen Sniegoski, when Putin first visited Israel in 2005, President Moshe Katsav hailed him as a “friend of Israel” and Ariel Sharon said he was “among brothers.”
In the last year alone, Bibi Netanyahu has gone to Moscow three times and Putin has visited Israel. The two get along wonderfully well.

Hey! That’s part of Putin’s “deep chess game!” He’s really an Alt-Right Traditionalist Anti-Semite, and don’t you ever think different!
Prayers, schmayers. More important: What was his cephalic index? Praetorian Guard, break out your calipers!

Buchanan Tells It Like It Is

What makes the GOP Establishment think things will go back to “normal?”

If Beltway Republicans think they can stop Trump and turn back the movement behind him, and continue on with today’s policies on trade, immigration and intervention, they will be swept into the same dustbin of history as the Rockefeller Republicans.

America is saying, “Goodbye to all that.”

For Trump is not only a candidate. He is a messenger from Middle America. And the message he is delivering to the establishment is: We want an end to your policies and we want an end to you.

If the elites think they can not only deny Trump the nomination, but turn back this revolution and re-establish themselves in the esteem of the people, they delude themselves.

This is hubris of a high order.
 

Three Reasons to Vote for Trump

Hold your nose and vote for the ignorant fraud.

Readers of this blog know I am highly skeptical of the Jew-connected, Negrophilic, affirmative action-loving, “man on white horse” savior of White America, Donald Trump.

I see him as an American Putin – superficial aspects appealing to a hero-worshiping far-Right concealing inner convictions that are anathema to that same far-Right.

Nevertheless. I would promote folks voting for Trump for reasons also previous explained here – that the (mistaken) public perception of Trump as a far-Right hater means that increased Trumpian success destabilizes the System and promotes chaos and racial-cultural-social balkanization.  

Here are three articles supporting that view; three reasons to vote for Trump:


National Review cuckservatives denounce Trump.

Hollywood degenerates somehow believe Trump supporters care what the Left “thinks.”

Putting aside Buchanan’s wrong-headed embrace of a reactionary worldview, his essay is the most important, as he predicts, as I have here at this blog, that the Right Populist phenomenon will not end with Der Trumpening.  It is only the beginning.  Davos, cuckservatives, and the Hollywood Left can cry all they wish, but Trump has let the genie out of the bottle or, if you prefer, the toothpaste is out of the tube and cannot be put back in.

And, by the way, the Davos and National Review reactions underscore why conservatism, free-trade, and the whole mainstream Right must be utterly destroyed.

What we need is ultra-radical pan-European national socialism, not “capital gains tax cuts” or whatever other nonsense cuckservative mewling faggots believe is “political red meat” these days.

The Nazi Next Time

After Trump, the deluge?

The hysterical angst of the Republican Establishment concerning the rise of Trump is glorious to observe.  Of course, the interesting thing is their complete lack of self-awareness, their lack of understanding that they themselves are responsible for the predicament they find themselves in.
One reason is that the GOP has been complicit in the demographic changes that have put them “in between a rock and a hard place,” politically speaking. On the one hand, Republicans look at America’s growing colored population and see the need to appeal to that demographic. On the other hand, the GOP base of support is conservative White Americans, particularly right-of-center White men.  To pander to minorities runs the risk of alienating the base; to secure the base runs the risk of alienating the coloreds. Up to this point, the GOP strategy has been to pander to the colored minorities, while throwing “bones” to the base in the form of phony “implicit Whiteness” and “dog whistling” rhetoric with no real-life political consequences. Heretofore, the GOP has mastered feinting right during the primaries, running centrist in the general election, and, in the rare cases of GOP Presidential victories (since Ronnie Raygun, we have had only the two failed Bush men being elected), governing from the left. Base anger has been silenced by “they have nowhere else to go” “lesser of two evils” electoral considerations.
But now, the rise of Trump is an ill wind blowing in the direction of the GOP elites: the base is starting to awaken and will not be forever willing to “vote for lesser of two evils” and support anti-White leftist Republican candidates.
But there is something else. The problem with Trump is seemingly not only his ideology of right-wing populism (real or fake), it is also because the Republican Establishment – with some justification – see Trump as an ill-informed, vulgar, obnoxious, childish buffoon, with no self-control and an embarrassing lack of gravitas.  Very well, but in response to those concerns I have two words: Pat Buchanan.
Like Trump, Buchanan ran for President as a right-wing populist Republican. In fact, there is considerable overlap in overt ideology between the two men’s campaigns. While lacking Trump’s “alpha jerk-boy” charisma, Buchanan has certain advantages that you would think would endear him to the GOP elites: Buchanan is a well-informed, articulate, religious man, with strong Establishment connections, and prior political experience in previous Republican administrations. Buchanan has always been an “inside-the-Beltway” man, and is not an obnoxious buffoon.
And how did the GOP elites deal with the more polished and political Buchanan?  With the same disdain and hysteria that they now reserve for “Der Trumpening.”  The Elite made it clear that they would never accept Buchanan as the nominee, they panicked over his early successes, they sabotaged his campaign (as I recall, they even prevented him from being on the ballot in some states), etc.  So, the case of Buchanan proves that the problem with Trump is not so much his repellent personal aspects, but his core of right-wing populism. Anything that appeals to Whites is anathema to the GOP, which is of course self-destructive given the nature of the GOP base (it is not for nothing that Sam Francis labeled the GOP “the Stupid Party”).
The point is that the GOP lost anyway with Bush and Dole in 1992 and 1996. While it is understandable that the incumbent would be favored in 1992, there was no excuse for favoring the “living mummy” “civil rights Republican” Dole over Buchanan in 1996. Favoring Buchanan would have solidified the GOP base and could have put the party in the direction of a right-wing populist track that could have genuinely benefited White Americans.
But, no. The elites sabotaged Buchanan and they suppressed right-wing populism for several electoral cycles. Now it has erupted in a more “virulent” form with Donald Trump. Instead of learning their lesson and understanding that the base cannot be taken for granted, instead of understanding that they need candidates that appeal to the base, the GOP elites are hell-bent on sabotaging Trump and suppressing right-wing populism for another couple of electoral cycles.
They may succeed but they are playing with fire. Who will come after Trump?  Who will be the next right-wing populist?  As even worthless and weak Whites become more aggressive out of sheer desperation, who will they turn to next?  Someone more extreme and firebrand-populist compared to Trump to the same degree Trump is compared to Buchanan? 
It won’t be “the fire next time,” but it may well be “the Nazi next time.”  The GOP elites had better hope that their country clubs are well fortified indeed.