Category: politics

Hood vs. Metapolitics

Let’s consider.

Look at this again.  Emphasis added:

Obviously, public opinion affects what’s politically possible. Yet the Overton Window model is flawed because power can shape public opinion. There’s no neutral “marketplace of ideas.” It takes resources and platforms to spread a message.

Without strong political leaders, the government doesn’t govern. Policies are irrelevant. The media rule.

It’s time to rethink the Overton Window. The truth is already on our side. Many people already agree with us on most issues. If that were enough, we’d have already won.

Instead of trying to shock public opinion, we should focus on demanding platform access, creating financial networks, and building institutions and communities the media can’t destroy. Instead of focusing on ideology, we should focus on logistics. We need to change conditions on the ground and make it easier for white advocates to organize. Otherwise, we risk ending up like Georgia Clark, pleading for help from leaders who have already abandoned us.

If we consider Yockey’s definition of politics as “activity in relation to power,” then what Hood is talking about here is an emphasis on politics, broadly defined, as opposed to so-called “metapolitics.”

Is Hood correct?  It depends on what he means by “the truth is already on our side” and that people already agree with us. If he’s referring to the general idea that Whites have rights, Whites are under attack, Whites have legitimate interests and should be able to pursue those interests, and that Whites have to fight for racial preservation and a future for themselves and their civilization then, yes, the truth is “on our side” (putting aside the issue of who “our” is). How many White people already agree with us is questionable but, in broad terms, Hood is correct from this perspective.

However, if by “truth” Hood means the totality of Der Movement’s lies, half-truths, obsessions, dogmas, fetishism, and freakishness, then he’s 100% wrong.

Keep in mind though that the Left has been very successful in leveraging politics to achieve their goals, even though the Left is famous for its internal ideological squabbles.  They have been capable of doing both at the same time – power politics rallying around foundational paradigms while still struggling internally to sort out the deeper meaning underlying their paradigms.

Thus, the Far Right can and should engage in politics based on broad paradigms while the struggle for the mind, heart, and soul of racial activism continues. The two things are of course linked, in both directions.  First, the more powerful the Far Right becomes, the more familiar the masses will become to the deeper paradigms, and the more disgusted and repulsed they will become by Der Movement’s retarded dogmas, thus ending and reversing progress.  Long term progress will be attainable only if the correct paradigms underlie political activism.  Second, initial success in the political sphere will give more power for activists in the internal struggle to influence the paradigms; hence, political success by fetishists will backfire and doom long term success.

The main point I believe that Hood is making is that metapolitics is not sufficient; politics, activity in relation to power, is essential.  Anyone who is claiming that “changing the culture” – independent of politics – can lead to victory is either delusional or are openly lying to you.

I’m not a mind-reader and I am hesitant to ascribe secret agendas to any person; thus, I will not mention anyone by name.  In general, however, I suspect that, in some cases, what happened is that some of these people were genuine and sincere in their initial activism, but became disillusioned over time, and realized that they sacrificed the opportunity for a real career for a losing proposition. They then decided to grift and cynically extract a living from the “movement,” focusing on activities that will achieve nothing, all the time citing the inevitability of victory – just as long as people keep on sending them donations.

Regardless of those people, and regardless of the specifics of what Hood actually meant by “truth,” I endorse the main thesis of the last part of his essay.  Power is important; without power, all of the “truth” in the world won’t save you.  To get power, you need politics.

The grifters will, in response, invoke the example of the implosion of the Soviet Union and of communism in Eastern Europe. They’ll clam that it collapsed under the weight of its own lies, ineptness, and contradictions (will the same happen to Der Movement?). In actuality, that was only half the story, the internal problems of the Soviet bloc became fatal because that bloc was being pressured from the outside, primarily by the USA under Reagan, and, more generally, by decades of Cold War competition from the “West.”

There is no similar pressure being put against the System from the outside.  Oh, people will invoke ”Russia and China” – as if the civic nationalist Putin regime is itself not part of the System, and likewise for the White hating regime of China (*).  You can say that, well, even if the struggle is between competing factions of the same System that can still result in a useful collapse of part of the System.  But rather than collapse we’ll just get an internal power re-alignment of the System; Whites will continue to be enslaved, but the big bosses will have epicanthic folds rather than yarmulkes. There is no real “outside” here to exert pressure on the System as a whole.  Hopes about “peak oil” and “environmental collapse” are equally misguided, and “The Green New Deal” demonstrates how the System will leverage its own problems to bolster its own power and the anti-White paradigm at the foundation of its worldview. So, no my dear grifters, without the hard practical work of politics, broadly defined, there will be no change.  All of your “metapolitics” can be shut down by brute force; “truth” is meaningless when you are silenced and deplatformed, with no real outside power pressuring your enemies to force them to make concessions to you. Suvorov’s Law came into force in the USSR because the combination of internal problems and external pressure forced Gorbachev’s hand in implementing reforms. The “external” and “outside” pressure against the System is going to have to come from dissident forces within the System itself.

Hood is correct.  Johnson and all of the “we just need to change the culture” people are wrong. You can’t “change the culture” in the midst of severe repression. Only Suvorov’s Law can save us – the System has to be pressured into making concessions that begins the process of inevitable collapse. In the absence of a viable outside pressure source to “heighten the contradictions,” the “outside” source has to come from within – leveraging the System’s power against itself in a form of sociopolitical ju-jitsu – electoral politics and the holding of some of the levers of authority no matter how small (initially), democratic multiculturalism, community building and activism – practical, real world activity in relation to power.  In a word – politics.

*Speaking of the Chinese, the recent episode of Chinese illegal alien human smuggling exposes as a lie all of Derbyshire’s self-serving nonsense about an “Arctic Alliance” between Whites and East Asians. Asians are part of the problem, they are invaders the same as any other colored people.  How in the world is Chinese illegal immigration and human trafficking any different from that of, say, Hispanics invading the US? How is the Chinese invasion of Europe, legal and illegal, different from any of the other Global South influxes? There is no difference, except that “Rosie” is Chinese and not Hispanic, Black, or Muslim.  

What Should Be Done, Again

Strategies.

Every once in a while at this blog, I find it useful – albeit somewhat repetitious for long time readers – to discuss the strategies that I believe that (American, but also applicable throughout the White world) racial nationalism needs to implement in order to make progress and achieve objectives.  As noted, this has been discussed here before.  Also see this.

1. Build a legionary cadre.  No defectives, no Alt Right lulzers, no obsessives and fetishists, no zombies mindlessly parroting “movement” dogma, but hardcore, “vanguardist” political soldiers, truly vetted (extremely!) and put through years of long apprenticeship, a genuine movement akin to that of Codreanu, a pan-European Brotherhood that will form the core of the undermining of the old System and the creation of a new one.  And guess what?  This is not talked about in “interviews” with the media, it is not recruited online in sniggering “forums,” it is instead done privately and prudently, slowly, carefully, and with forethought.  Obviously, the existence of such an organization would not be a secret, just as the existence of the CIA, MI6, KGB, and GRU were not secrets, but the inner workings of the group, by analogy to those others, would of course be hidden from the public.  

2. Community activism.  Real community activism is done, not talked about.  It is done as much as possible “under the radar.”  You do not broadcast it to mocking media operatives, you don’t go through the motions for the sake of a quick blog post, this is not something done overnight.  True community activism is for the long-term, it is a work of years, it is done to help the community, not with an attitude of expecting an immediate compensation – the idea of compensation should not come into it at all. Of course, community activism by its nature cannot be kept secret; the point is that such activism is its own publicity – in other words, it becomes known because it occurs and it is effective, it is its own advertisement, it doesn’t become known because activists spend more time talking to the media than they do actually helping people.

3. Metapolitics and infrastructure. Metapolitics has been discussed endlessly by the Far Right, and so there is no need to repeat all of that here. Such activity is essential, as long as it is fresh, creative, and open-minded, and not merely the regurgitation of fossilized “movement” dogma.  We need real infrastructure to carry out our objectives, approaches to defeat social pricing, funding that goes beyond tin cup panhandling but actual involves earning money through some sort of productivity, service, and/or representation, we need lawyers (and not to drive them out of the “movement”), we need businessmen, doctors, academics, plumbers, mechanics, schoolteachers, politicians, we need a recreated and actualized society. By the way, metapolitics should include Salter’s democratic multiculturalism, which overlaps with both community activism and electoral politics.

4. Electoral politics. This has three purposes.  First, education, propaganda, and recruitment.  Second, provocation, heightening the contradictions, undermining the System, promoting chaos and balkanization.  Third, if elected, these people can not only leverage their office for the preceding two purposes, but also to protect the movement as much as possible.

5. Rallies, etc. – false-flag and genuine. False-flag rallies are meant as a distraction, to focus attention of adversaries to the open and superficial “cosplay actors on the street” as opposed to the more serious work going on elsewhere.  It would still need to be credible, to be viewed as a genuine threat and so worthy of attention, and also so as not to repulse Whites interested in joining the cause.  Later on, with the success of the other objectives 1-4 above, rallies and mass meetings, of a highly professional nature (even more so that the false-flag ones), can occur for all the positives such events can genuinely provide to a real and growing firmly established movement.

I would once again like to describe what I think should be done, so as to pre-emptively answer the screeching of the Quota Queens, who would falsely accuse me of only criticizing and not offering constructive suggestions. I have of course often given such suggestions, as noted above, and will do so again now. Let us consider the three major legs of the strategic tripod.

1. Electoral Politics

I have often talked about the need for involvement in electoral politics, as well as the wasted opportunity right after 2016. Right wing populism was “hot,” there was momentum; prudent planning could have set up some interesting local campaigns for 2018.  But, instead, the Quota Queens gave us Unite the Right, drunken podcasts, the Pilleater Chronicles, and all the rest.  But the wheel turns and as the Left exposes their insanity for all the world to see, and as Trump exposes himself as an insincere, semi-retarded fraud, there may once again be room for maneuver on the Far Right edges of American electoral politics.

2. Metapolitical education

There is not much need to discuss this here, as it is straightforward, and it is the one thing of the three that Der Movement is actually focusing on right now. Of course, I believe that Der Movement is doing a terrible job of it, doing more harm than good.  But as far as the type of activity, then, for example, the type of thing done by Counter-Currents would be an example of metapolitics, although I of course almost completely disagree with their content.  

3. Infrastructure/Community/Organization

What is meant by this?

Infrastructure – this covers such things including, but not limited to, financial resources, physical structures such as headquarters and meeting halls, competent personnel, equipment, a very competent and aggressive legal team, media resources, publishing, Internet hosting, and all of the various things required for the day-today running of a dissent movement, and its constituent organizations and groupuscules, in the context of operating in a hostile System.  

Community – you can read some of the ideas I proposed in my interview with Robert Griffin (long ago) in his One Sheaf One Vine book as examples of things we can do for outreach to the broader White community. And of course, community building can mean for our own people, setting up alternative community structures, leveraging infrastructure (see above) to defeat social pricing and allow pro-White activists to survive and thrive in a hostile System environment, and all of this can range from meetings at the small scale to actual physical communities, relatively self-sufficient, at the large scale.  And, as stated, we need outreach to the broader White population to provide assistance to them (and receive such in return) and for recruitment.

Organization – we will need the spectrum of organizational complexity, from slime mold to rhizome.

One crucial component, which overlaps with the need for community (and for metapolitical education) is the Legionary concept.  To be successful, we need The New Man.  We need a “school of palingenesis” in which activists can be reborn, improved in every way, particularly morally and spiritually. Given inherent problems with Whites in general, and pro-White activists in particular, today, this is essential.

This infrastructure/community/organization component will be the most difficult section of the three-part strategy to actualize.  After all, metapolitical education is already occurring; although I disagree with most of it and most of it is currently at a low level of quality, at least the pattern is established, and such education is scalable from the individual blogger up to a large scale organization or political campaign. Such education requires less organization and discipline for success than the other components, particularly the last one. Political campaigns can be done and the open and more “mainstream” nature of those endeavors also proves some leeway in the competence of its actualization.  

However, building community, infrastructure, and quality vanguardist organizations will require a very high level of competence, prudence, foresight, sanity, and reasonableness, all qualities profoundly lacking in the “movement.”  Look at the disasters that have occurred when any of this has been tried in even a crude initial form. Can you imagine?  You’ll have a bunch of Nutzis marching around screaming “Pepe,” “Kek,” “Jews will not replace us,” agonizing over the dire racial threat of hora-dancing Romanians and two foot tall Southern Italian Africans, while allowing homosexual sexual harassment and transparently obvious infiltrations. Actualizing these objectives will require the New Movement I have proposed.  The Old Movement will be completely incapable of doing what needs to be done.  They’ll just make a mess of everything, strangle it in the crib.

Each of these strategies synergizes with the other two.  The electoral campaigns provide a platform for propaganda, thus boosting metapolitical education and the campaigns can enhance community building, organization, and infrastructure – at the very least bringing like-mined people together and giving them real-world training in running an important endeavor.  In the unlikely event any of the candidates are elected, this would be a practical asset if they can use their position to provide assistance and protection (to the extent possible) for the other legs of the strategy, and, of course, such a victory would be a boost for morale and a propaganda asset. Metapolitical education provides the ideological framework for the other two components, and is a crucial component in recruiting people for those other components. Infrastructure/Community/Organization actualizes the metapolitical education into reality, it is the real-world outcome of metapolitical/education/propaganda efforts, and it provides the raw material in personnel, infrastructure, and other resources to assist in the other two legs of the overarching strategy.

And if we fail, I for one at least offered a generalized scheme for a back-up plan.  Meanwhile your “leaders” endorse Tulsi Gabbard and Andrew Yang, or scream about “Pepe” and “Kek.”  Your choice, my friends. Real, serious, sober leadership or comically inept infantile grifters. We all know the outcome of that choice now, don’t we?

In any case, once again, this is what needs to be done.  This is what should have been done after the 2016 election, this is what should have been done in the years and decades preceding, and this is what needs to be done going forward, starting now.

Will it be done?  Of course not.  With your majestic leaders, dancing through cemeteries with swastika-soled boots, expect nothing more than continued endless failure.

Reality Contra Johnson, 8/20/19

Why Trump won.

Greg Johnson continuously gaslights his readers to accept the nonsense that Trump is sincere since he could have won the nomination and election by being an ideological clone of Jeb Bush but chose not to. Thus, Trump really believed in what he professed during the campaign, he wasn’t an obvious fraud and buffoon as I stated back then, no, Trump, a “man of genuine greatness,” really meant all that he said, and his supporters in Der Movement cannot be criticized for believing it.

According to this absurd “take” on the election, it was Trump’s charming personality and not his right-wing populism that led to victory.  Of course, in my opinion, all of this is justification for Johnson to refuse to admit being wrong about Trump – wrong on a level that is astonishing – so that his position as a “movement leader” can be safeguarded from legitimate criticism about his bad judgment.

In my opinion, Trump won ONLY because he staked out positions to appeal to White voters feeling demographically swamped and who wanted someone to defend their interests.

Let’s see what others have said. 

From before the election, but after Trump won the nomination:

Most of Trump’s supporters back him not because of his rudeness and brutality but despite it. They think it worthwhile to pay the price of such outbursts because of other things for which they think Trump stands—say, his critique of illegal immigration, international trade agreements, or our foreign policy.

Carefully read this.

Here is the PNAS study.  Read it well.  Hmmm…if anxiety about loss of White majority status was a major driver for Trump support in 2016, then does it make sense that these same voters would have supported Trump if he had mimicked Jeb’s open borders, pro-amnesty, pro-immigration stance toward demographic change?   That political science study clearly supports Sallis and utterly refutes Johnson.

Trump himself understood it:

In the same rally, he pointed out something that voters at his events frequently raise — that despite reservations about his personality, they approve of his message on tackling illegal immigration, hitting Isis harder, and doing better deals around the world.

The reality is quite clear. The facts are quite clear.  What is not clear is why anyone in the “movement” continues to support Johnson.

So, is this one of the voices of WN 2.0 or WN 3.0?  Inquiring minds want to know!

Questions for Greg Johnson

About Trump.

Readers of this blog am aware that I refute Johnson’s take on Trump; for example, see here.

Johnson likes to portray the Trump question as one in which everyone was on “The Trump Train” in 2016 and everyone thought that Trump was sincere back then, and only now are people debating whether or not Trump was sincere, and only now are there disagreements on how to interpret Trump – it’s all after the fact.

But, as readers of this blog well know, I was openly calling Trump a fraud, a vulgar ignorant buffoon, and a Negrophilic race cuck BEFORE the election.  This was my endorsement of Trump the day before the election:

Yes, Trump is a vulgar ignorant buffoon, a Negro-loving beta race cuck civic nationalist with a Jewified family, an overweight imbecile, a lazy and ill-prepared debater, an embarrassment of a political candidate, a blustering clown, and a crass jackass. Nevertheless, as SJW America perceives Trump as being a “racist fascist bigot,” a Trump electoral victory will do a fine job of destabilizing the multicultural consensus, balkanizing society, enraging the Coloreds and the Left, creating chaos, and weakening the System.

I was correct all across the board – about Trump himself and the hysterical leftist reaction to Trump.  And I was critical of Trump in a similar fashion even before that Nov. 7, 2016 post – calling him “Touchback Trump” for his open embrace of “touchback immigration” and other support for legal mass immigration and back-door amnesty for illegals.

Here are a few comments about Trump featured on EGI Notes in the weeks leading up to the election:

How desperate WN activists must have been to consider Donald Trump (of all people!) as some sort of savior. 

A key point here is that Trump is more or less an intellectual empty vessel, so one must take care as to what is poured into him.  

Thus, the current electoral campaign needs to be considered, not because the vulgar buffoon Trump, a negro-loving race cuck, is of importance in and of himself, but because of the possibilities inherent in leveraging the Trump phenomenon for White racial advantage in the dark days to come.

Trump: the leftist, Negro-loving, waffling, indecisive, amnesty-shilling, beta ultra-cuck.  

And within a week of the election, I was accusing Trump of “cucking.”  That was at a time when all the Quota Queens were hysterically hailing Trump and talking about how the “God Emperor” was going to fix American demographics.

I note that Kevin Strom also expressed reservations about Trump before the election.

Questions for Johnson:

What were Strom and I seeing in 2016 about Trump that you people were missing?  Why was I openly labelling Trump a buffoon, a fraud, a race cuck, etc. back in 2016, while you are still claiming – in 2019! – that Trump was sincere and a man of genuine greatness? There must have been SOMETHING that people like me determined about Trump in the past that you still do not recognize today – or pretend not to recognize to protect your reputation. What was it?

Those questions get to the heart of the matter.  It’s not as if everyone was in the same boat back in 2016 but now differ looking back in hindsight.  There were fundamental differences of opinion about Trump precisely at the time when people like Johnson were most enthusiastic about Trump.

So again: What was I (and people like Strom) noticing about Trump that the likes of Johnson were missing?

Occam’s Butterknife: Sallis and Strom were wrong about Trump in 2016 and, by an amazing coincidence, events just happened to work out so that everything they were saying about Trump has become legitimized by how Trump has behaved since being elected. Trump is a man of greatness – genuine greatness! – brought down by some inner flaw, a tragic figure, perhaps being blackmailed by dastardly puppet-masters who forced him into a showdown with Sweden over A$AP Rocky.

Occam’s Razor: Trump in 2016 was transparently showing all the signs of being a crass vulgar ignorant buffoon, a man with deep Jewish connections even in his closest family, a man with a long record of having close personal ties with Negro celebrities, a man with socially liberal views (except for an attachment to “law and order” and a personal animus toward Obama), a man with no real deep inner convictions other than his own ego, a man obviously latching on to right-wing populism to distinguish himself from other GOP candidates who were far more intelligent and qualified and favored to win, a man completely undisciplined and intellectually lazy, a man who values family and friends over ideology and hardcore politics, a blustering blowhard without the inner fire to follow through on hard decisions, a small and mediocre man with enough cunning and showmanship to find a winning formula to victory. And, also, people paying careful attention noticed his civic nationalism even at the peak of his populist rhetoric, and his additions of a “big beautiful door” in “the wall” and his constant refrain of “touchback immigration.”  Perhaps people remembered all of the previous Man on White Horse failures. And, perhaps, just perhaps, those people who lambasted Trump in 2016 were merely demonstrating keen insight and good judgment, qualities sorely lacking in the superficial Pepe crowd who jumped on “The Trump Train” with nary a skeptical thought.

Johnson can try and gaslight you folks all he wants, but the questions asked above remain.  Why were some skeptical of Trump at the height of the Alt Right hysteria over the man?  What were those people noticing?  How did they know that Trump was an insincere fraud?  Why did they pick up on the danger signs of immediate cucking right after the election?  If Trump was sincere why did he strike some people as transparently insincere?  If Trump is a man of genuine greatness why did he immediately strike some people as a moronic buffoon, and why has he acted like a buffoon since being elected?

Most of all, why can’t any of the Quota Queens have the character to admit that they were wrong?

Gaslighting Greg at It Again

Pathetic.

Hunter Wallace has declared war on President Trump. He’s not the only one, of course, but he’s by far the most articulate.

That “most articulate” (by far!) declaration of war by Wallace is simply his reposting of someone else’s tweets. Laughable. This demonstrates why Johnson has to rank among the most fundamentally dishonest people in the Far Right today. He only addresses the low hanging fruit, and ignores real and legitimate criticism.

Johnson’s dishonesty is on display by comparing the following two paragraphs.

Trump’s America First, National Populist stances on immigration, globalization, and foreign policy resonated with millions of Americans: Republicans, independents, and even Democrats. Enough to win him the nomination and the Presidency.

But, as I never tire of pointing out, Trump did not have to take these positions to win. The whole system is premised on not giving the people what they want. Trump could have played by the system’s rules. Trump could have xeroxed the Jeb! platform and still won, based simply on his celebrity, money, and personality. In fact, it would have been easier for Trump to win that way, because by running a National Populist campaign, he had to fight a two-front war against Hillary Clinton and the Republican Party/Conservative Inc. establishment.

So, on the one hand, Trump’s campaign resonated because of his right-wing populism; on the other hand, he could have won simply by being Jeb II with a bigger personality. Johnson has to pull this sleight-of-hand nonsense because he needs to defend his own naive and simpleton-like belief – put in writing years ago and criticized here – that Trump was “sincere.” You see, the “proof” that Trump was “sincere” is that he ran a right-wing populist campaign even though he could have won by being a vulgar and ignorant version of Jeb Bush. Even though that “Trump’s America First, National Populist stances on immigration, globalization, and foreign policy resonated…Enough to win him the nomination and the Presidency.” The reality of course is that Trump’s personality and personal history was actually an impediment for certain important sections of the Republican electorate, who overlooked these flaws because of the promise of Trump’s right-wing populism.

Johnson keeps on peddling the same stupidity that I’ve refuted here time and again. Particularly the idea that Trump could have won on a Jeb Bush platform is so outrageous, it must win an all-time award for Imperial Gaslighting.

See this, emphasis added:

Johnson doesn’t believe Trump was a fraud from the beginning; after all, that would prove Sallis right and Johnson wrong, and we can’t have that. Johnson promotes the lie that Trump could have “cloned Jeb Bush’s platform” and still have won because of his “personality”- can you believe this? In reality, Trump’s campaign took off only after he started talking about Mexican rapists and started attacking the Bush family and their policies.  

What’s laughable is that right after Johnson makes his gaslighting comment, they all admit that people voted for Trump precisely because of his strong talk about immigration (these guys can’t get their stories straight from minute to minute.) – yes, that’s the point.  It was NOT Trump’s personality, which was actually a turn-off for many people who voted for him.  Does anyone believe that Republican voters, including evangelicals, would support a twice-divorced and thrice-married vulgar New York real estate tycoon and reality TV star who talks about his “big hands” and “grabbing pussies” IF this buffoon was merely a neoconservative clone of Jeb Bush?  Does any sane person believe that the enthusiasm that carried Trump to the nomination and then to the Presidency was based on his obnoxious jackass personality, independent of a hardline position on immigration and his America First domestic and foreign policy positions that were articulated during the campaign?…

…It is entirely possible that Trump has some very vague civic nationalist and populist beliefs. But they are likely not important to him, not crucial to his worldview; he is not serious or sincere about any of it in any hardcore, authentic fashion.  He does in fact embody, as Ted Cruz suggested, New York values. He has Jewish family connections, a deep attachment to Israel, and a fondness for Negroes. He is a self-centered narcissist and if he truly cares about anyone other than himself then it likely is his elder daughter Ivanka and no one else. He certainly doesn’t care about his base.  If Trump was (and is) sincere, then why does he ignore his base (e.g., Antifa attacks, State of the Union address), lie to his base (e.g., “the Wall is being built!”) and constantly betray his base (e.g., hiring Neocons, shilling for increased legal immigration, an aggressive foreign policy, pro-Negro “criminal justice reform”)?  The man cares more about pardoning Jack Johnson than he does about his own supporters being physically attacked in the streets and sent to the hospital. His own DOJ persecutes his followers when they defend themselves and ignores the leftist domestic terrorists running wild in the streets.  For Trump to be sincere and commit all his crimes of omission and commission against his base means that the man must be a psychotic retard. However, while he may be vulgar and ignorant, and may be a psychopath, he is not psychotic and he is not retarded…

…if he were sincere, he’s had 2.5 years to give some demonstration of it, and he has done the exact opposite.  He’s not sincere.  He’s a fraud and Johnson was wrong and Sallis was right.

Now back to Johnson’s screed:

When a man pays a huge price to campaign on issues that he didn’t need to win, that tells me that he is sincere. That’s why I believed Trump could save America. That’s why I did everything in my power to get him elected.

This is all about Johnson defending himself, not Trump. This is all about Johnson defending himself, so all you guys don’t realize how naive and inept he really is, so you keep sending in your “D’Nations” and allow him to live a better life than you do yourselves. How many trips to Europe have you taken recently?  

So what happened to the Trump presidency? Obviously, he encountered forces stronger than his convictions about what is necessary to save America. Many of these forces are external. Blackmail cannot be ruled out. Historians will be puzzling out the enigma of Trump well into the next century.

Or they could have been reading EGI Notes back in 2016.  I told you Trump was a fraud and a moron and I was correct.  Johnson – an affirmative action “leader” – was dead wrong, and can’t admit it without the entire facade he’s erected around himself collapsing.

Donald Trump is a tragic figure in the true sense of the word. We are witnessing the terrifying spectacle of a man of genuine greatness failing because of his own grievous faults.

A man of genuine greatness!  Who talked about his “big hands” at debates, and whose knowledge about America’s nuclear triad revolved around “devastation is really important.” This is a man whose policy decisions are influenced by Kim Kardashian and Kanye West. This is a man who sits back and does nothing while his own supporters are physically attacked with impunity; indeed, his own DOJ persecutes his own supporters. He behaves like a borderline retard, but he must be “a man of genuine greatness,” or else Johnson is exposed as a fool, and we can’t have that!

Now I have a serious question to pose to White Nationalists: 

Why support Greg Johnson?

If you want our movement to be in a position to mobilize the Trump electorate and turn it into a genuinely revolutionary National Populist movement, what should our stance be today and going into the 2020 election?

Der Movement needs to be destroyed.

Should we openly declare war on “Blompf”? Should we pour scorn on the “boomers” and “normies” who still support him? Should we announce our intention to tip the 2020 election to the Democrats?

Who is doing the latter?  Oh, that’s right, Johnson’s fellow Quota Queens.  Tulsi Gabbard!  Andrew Yang!  Thus cry the affirmative action cases.  They’ll be endorsing AOC next.

Believe me, folks, I understand the temptation. The A$AP Rocky fiasco is surely one of the most surreal and undignified episodes in the history of the American Presidency. 

But, let us not forget – Trump is a man of genuine greatness!  I mean, really now, EGI Notes told you, years ago, that Trump was a Negrophilic race cuck.  But keep on supporting Johnson and his impeccable pedigree.

And the entire “A$AP Rocky fiasco” undermines Johnson’s argument, as suggested in my last paragraph.  Why would a man of “genuine greatness” do something so outrageously,  embarrassingly stupid?  Is the “tragic figure” Trump being blackmailed to support Black rappers?  Was he blackmailed to pardon Jack Johnson or to push for “criminal justice reform” to allow Black criminals back on the streets?  Isn’t it more likely that Trump is simply a moron, a juvenile jackass, a fan of Negro entertainers, a man of genuine smallness and mediocrity?

And I understand why the Left would like to exploit the El Paso massacre to grab power, but it boggles the mind that Trump and the Republicans are basically willing to throw power away, undermining the First and Second Amendments merely to appease raving lunatics who think anyone to the Right of Hillary Clinton should be censored, disarmed, and eventually replaced by brown helots.

Hmm…would a man truly sincere in his beliefs do this?

Bashing Trump has several benefits:

1. It helps put a stake in the heart of the Man on White Horse Syndrome.

2. It exposes the pathetic failures of the Quota Queens, who followed up their Trump humiliation with endorsements of Tulsi Gabbard and Andrew Yang.

3. It clearly distinguishes White nationalism from Trumpian fraud and moronic civic nationalism.

These guys had three years to reach out to Trump supporters, and instead gave us Unite the Right, the Pilleater Chronicles, and the usual “movement” stupidities and dogmas.  They are protecting their own income stream.  Send in those “D’Nations”- that’s what it is all about. Defending Trump is all about defending their own record of hysterical Trump support.  MAGA!  Pepe!  Kek!

If average group intelligence defines “supremacy,” this is a “yellow supremacist” publication.

Well, since Amren is always harping on IQ, then it is a yellow supremacist publication, as I have previously stated, and got criticized for by all the usual suspects.

The Counter-Currents and Amren failings together point out the real problem.  The real problem is Der Movement, not Trump.  It never really mattered, in the end, if Trump was sincere or not.  Running that campaign,and being elected, was sufficient to set the stage. The 2016 election handed the baton to the “leaders” of the “movement” – who promptly dropped the baton in the toilet and flushed it away. Instead of building in depth we instead got obsessions over a cartoon frog, tiki torch marches and “Jews will not replace us,” Hermansson and Lewis, Pilleater’s accusations of cocaine use and homosexual sexual harassment at “racialist meetings,” the deranged fetishism of Durocher and Ash Donaldson, declarations that Anglin will be one of the new voices of WN 3.0 (remember that, Greg?), endorsements of Gabbard and Yang, and all the rest.  Trump didn’t fail the “movement,”  The “movement” failed itself.  And it failed you, dear reader.

Der Alt Right Marches On

The usual failures and humiliations.

What happened? Answer: David Duke is a fool. So is Spencer. So is anyone in Der Movement who endorsed or otherwise supported or promoted Princess Tulsi Coconut.  It’s not even primary season yet, and the Quota Queens are already being humiliated by their Man on White Horse Syndrome (or in this case, Woman on Samoan Surfboard Syndrome) candidates. Keep on enabling your “leaders” though, because, well, you know….

Meanwhile, Trump’s DOJ is hard at work.  Is Trump going to plan an Otto Skorzeny-style operation (a la Mussolini) to rescue A$AP Rocky?  MAGA! Pepe!  Kek!

Meanwhile, again, Trump is monitoring the situation. What is there to “consider?”  Just do it or don’t do it.  You see, this way, Trump has all the MAGA yokels excited about the “impeding action” – without having to actually do anything except producing another blustering tweet.  MAGA!  Pepe!  Kek!

A perfect inversion of reality (from Counter-Currents, of course):

Darryl Cooper: Something that you just said, definitely it’s something I’ve observed. I think maybe ten, fifteen, or twenty years ago, a lot of the time when you would think of a White Nationalist, you’re not necessarily thinking of a savory character. And I think there was probably some justice to that stereotype. But a lot of the people that I’m meeting now, who self-identify as Alt Right, like you said, are college-educated people who are well put together, who carry themselves well, who often have families that are at a young age and who take care of them. It’s definitely a different brand of people than the Venice Beach skinhead that I would have run into when I was a kid. I don’t want to leave that theme of alienation that you were talking about right now, but we’re going to get into that in a little bit. I kind of have that earmarked.

From my approximately quarter-century involvement in the American racial nationalist scene, my impression is exactly the opposite.  Well, almost exactly the opposite.  I think the most accurate analogy is with the American class system. In the past, we had a real and dynamic (White) middle class that was the backbone of the nation, with some rich and some poor above and below.  Today, that middle is evaporating, and society is starting to separate into broad categories of “haves” and “have nots.” Similarly, in the past, you had a solid “middle class” or fairly useful activists, with, obviously, some real Nutzi nutcases at the bottom and a few intellectual types at the top.  Today, that middle ground of solid activists is almost gone; instead we have a greater number of intellectuals and academic types, but a huge number of dysfunctional Nutzis, juvenile jackasses, and freaks/perverts.  And even the upper crust of intellectuals are problematic, since many them are jackasses, freaks, perverts, drug addicts, grifters, those with terminally bad judgment, or some combination thereof.  Overall, the quality of activists is lower now than in the past, and the Alt Right in particular is – or more properly was – a real cesspool of manifest inferiority.

Ethnic Cleansing?

The hypocrisy of the Left.

A common criticism of WNs from the Left – and I see this a lot about Spencer on Twitter – is that they support “ethnic cleansing.”  Well, in most cases they do, but so do those who make the accusation. The Left’s hypocrisy is on display here, since the major difference here is one of Who? Whom?

WNs support the ethnic cleansing of non-Whites, typically rapidly by repatriation; the Left supports ethnic cleansing of Whites, typically slowly though race replacement immigration and varied forms of demographic (and cultural, social, economic, and political) displacement.  And, of course, WNs are honest and upfront about their objectives, while the Left dishonestly masks its objectives via moral posturing about “diversity, multiculturalism, open borders, vibrant immigration, migrant rights, opposite to ‘hate,’ ‘anti-fascism,’ and all the rest of the transparent cant.

And on other news: Are they learning yet?  This is why Johnson is, of course, wrong and dishonest, and why Sallis is, of course, correct.  Bashing of Trump from the Right is not “small-minded” whining, or what other gaslighting nonsense Johnson feeds you to hide the fact of his own past pro-Trump hysteria.  The actual purpose of the Trump-bashing on this blog is to demonstrate the utter intellectual and moral bankruptcy of Der Movement, its utter stupidity and cluelessness of making the same world historical errors over and over again, and its “leaders” not even admitting their errors much less learning from them.

I mean, this thing was endorsed by Duke. Both Johnson and Spencer are on The Yang Gang.  Der Movement, with its affirmative action leadership, is absolutely ludicrous.  That’s the point.