Category: racial dominance

Separation: The Cure For Racial Resentment

Separation is the solution.
Given this recent story I’ve decided to reprint an old essay (slightly edited) I used to have up on one of my previous blogs (which starts with “The following analysis…” – see below).  I think the essay is relevant to the unfortunate story of the White man attacked by the Black mob.  The question here is a sense of racial resentment due to a feeling of racial inferiority.  Look at the picture, on the right, of one of the suspects.  Take a long look at that phenotype. Imagine having to live looking like that, having to see that in the mirror; the lips alone are enough to make the most unpleasant impression.  Now, I’m no mind reader and neither, dear reader, are you, but less us speculate.  If one takes a realization (hidden or overt) of physical repulsiveness, coupled with an equal realization of the mental and behavioral defects of particular groups and their low productivity and achievements throughout history, and the frustrations of this cognitively limited group to make their way unassisted in a modern technological society – could that cause resentment? Rage? Bitterness?  Envy toward those groups who are more attractive, intelligent, disciplined, creative, productive, useful and successful in every way possible? Is it not plausible that this envious rage can boil over into violence, when the less valuable group is confronted by the more valuable? 

Leftists would assert the (in their eyes, justifiable) rage is due to “White racism” and “White privilege” and “an unjust society.”  However, given decades of catering to Blacks (and other minorities) in every way, decades of affirmative action, trillions of dollars of handouts, myriads of special programs, endless pro-Colored and anti-White propaganda, forced integration, endless White guilt and White surrender, de jure and de facto sociopolitical realities that make Whites into a low-caste, subaltern group according to law, culture, and custom – all the left-wing excuses fall flat. Being constantly pushed up and pushed forward, the Negro could – and should – have been very successful if they had the same innate qualities as Whites. But they have failed and they know it – they know it themselves even if they would never publicly admit it.
One could even be – in a very objective sense – sympathetic to the psychic pain felt by the less valuable group.  But this pain is not the fault of the more valuable group (unless you assign blame for causing the two groups to occupy the same territory to begin with, which of course is a reasonable historical blame to consider).  Both are ultimately victims and separation is best, to prevent the less valuable to constantly have to come up against reminders of their limitations, and to prevent the more valuable group from suffering the consequences of the resentments of the less valuable.  Thus we can consider the following.
The following analysis specifically deals with African “Americans;” however, the same applies to all non-Whites (including NECs), who seem to have an instinctive aversion to Whites that borders on the irrational.
What are the roots of Black hostility, including crime, directed against Whites and White society? Certainly, there is likely a genetic element which leads persons of sub-Saharan African ancestry towards violence and crime in general. It’s like a duck taking to water, very natural.
However, in addition, are there any real and honest psychological explanations that contribute to this? Some commentators note that the constant talk about “White racism” and the alleged crimes of Whites against Blacks and other “people of color” is bound to incite hatred toward Whites, a hatred which can lead to violence.  The late Lawrence Auster had talked about this on his blog, and it makes sense that if a naturally violent people are constantly told that another group has been oppressing them, then the outcome will be predictable.
Others come closer to the topic of this essay when they suggest that constant Black failure compared to White achievement is something which contributes to hatred – and envy.
I believe the jealousy angle – racial envy so to speak – needs to be further examined, which is the subject of this post.
Consider this “hair incident.”
From a Western, White perspective, the “outrage” felt by these Negroes is, of course, absurd (*).  Imagine getting angry at someone for touching their own hair!  Incredible!  Nevertheless, it is a real phenomenon. These Negroes were actually so offended by a White woman touching her hair that one of them actually had the nerve to suggest that he would complain to the White woman about her “outrageous” behavior! One wonders if similar hyper-sensitive “outrage” likely informs the attacks in which White girls are viciously assaulted by female Negroes, sometimes with the White girls’ hair being pulled out of their heads (e.g., the March 30, 2005 incident in Marine Park, Brooklyn).
Now, one could attempt to rationalize this in a number of ways, but the hypothesis here is that it is jealousy, a burning sense of racial inferiority that, in certain cases, can project itself as animalistic violence towards the subject of the envy.
In other words, at some level, Blacks realize that they are less intelligent, less attractive, less capable, and less evolved than Whites. This inner realization runs up against the well-documented inflated sense of self-esteem that Blacks have. The cognitive dissonance generated by this conflict between harsh reality and an unjustified sense of self manifests itself in a deep and bitter hatred to those perceived (accurately) as being superior.
Blacks are jealous of Whites for the simple fact that Whites are racially White/European (with all that implies about innate characteristics) and that the Blacks themselves are racially Black/African (with all that implies). To an unintelligent, violent people with an unnaturally high overt sense of self-esteem, the inner, secret, covert knowledge of this envy has no other outlet than animus directed toward Whites.
This hatred often erupts into violence. Other times it manifests itself in non-violent anti-social behaviors (targeted to “the man”) or in anti-White social and political activism. When one sees some grotesque Black “reverend” or “pastor” or militant pontificating about “White racism” or “White devils” – is this perhaps the cry of a tortured soul, secretly wishing to be White, hating being Black, and lashing out at those Whites who possess the one thing that these Blacks can never possess? What is “White privilege” really about? Certainly not treatment by society, as Whites are third class citizens in America, discriminated against both de facto and de jure. No, the privilege is the racial fact of “being White,” of being of European heritage, of the “aristocracy of the skin,” the “nobility of race.” It is the “unfairness” that some belong to a race noted for intelligence, achievement, culture, civilization, and physical attractiveness, while others belong to races noted for cognitive deficiency, violence, lack of cultural achievement, non-productivity, and a lack of physical attractiveness.
Likewise, when some Black militants praise Hitler in the midst of their otherwise constant denunciation of “Whitey”, is this what they are really thinking: “That guy Hitler was lucky. Look what he had to work with – Germans! And look at what I am stuck with!” – is that really it?
Now, again, I am not a mind reader. This is of course speculation, a hypothesis. We cannot know what really goes on in the minds of Blacks in these situation. Do they really think as I suspect they may do? Who knows? However, it is a plausible hypothesis (how it can be tested, I am not sure). Read again that link about the “hair incident” and consider everything you know about Black behavior and attitudes and come to your own conclusions. Again: very plausible.
Now, these putative feelings of bitter envy can become mixed with contempt, as coloreds see Whites bizarrely giving away their nations and their civilizations to other races, with Whites allowing themselves to be displaced and discriminated against in their own nations. This contempt can then turn to delight, a rare joy, with the realization that many Whites are fearful of Blacks. The privileged superior afraid of the resentful inferior! What could be sweeter than that?
The only solution to this problem is racial separation. Dwelling amongst their own kind, Blacks will not have to suffer the “indignities” of seeing White women running their fingers through their “long, flaxen hair,” and will not have to be reminded through such daily encounters about what they are and what they are not. Whites, on the other hand, would no longer be the victims of the envy of others, and all races can develop their own potential (such as it is) in a more mentally healthy atmosphere, free of lingering grudges and imagined slights.
What could be wrong with that?
*Once again, with respect to balkanization strategies: if African “Americans” can become so offended by a White woman touching her hair, imagine their reaction to steadfast, productive, pro-White sociopolitical activism and community building.


By the Way….

A suggestion.
While I believe ideas are more important than personalities, it’s also true that the moral and ethical thing to do – the Aryan ideal! – is to give credit to the originator of ideas, and to those who first broach a subject later copied by others.
Thus, folks writing about “racial dominance” and using terms like “virulent” to refer to the behavior of certain groups need to cite the prior work of James Bowery on those topics.  Bowery had been writing about racial genetic dominance and Jewish virulence long before current plagiarists (the same who refer to the “Pareto Principle” and discuss racially charged Cheerios commercials without acknowledging my prior writing on those subjects at the Occidental Observer) submitted their own rambling interpretation on racial dominance.
Didn’t Martin Luther King plagiarize?  Is that something a White Man would do?