Category: rat-faced leering levantine

Importance of Culture for EGI

Culture influences EGI.

At my other blog I had written about the importance of gene-culture interactions and how the concept can be used prescriptively, not only descriptively, through the convergence of European genetics (without panmixia!) through a sealing off of Europeans from non-Europeans, and low level gene flow over time among the former and none between the former and the latter – a concept of genetic concentration based on Identity (current genotypes and phenotypes, culture, history, etc.). Thus, culture is directly related to EGI, and directly influences it over historic time.
I again cite this paper that I briefly mentioned before that describes the process as occurring in the past. Note how NEC genetics has been radically changed by an important cultural-historical shift (Islamization). Note also that the more EC-like genetics in the Levant (of important when considering pre-Islamic Levantine gene flow into Europe) were Middle Easternified. In general, actual genetic data tend to go against the fantasies of “the movement.” Emphasis added:


The Levant is a region in the Near East with an impressive record of continuous human existence and major cultural developments since the Paleolithic period. Genetic and archeological studies present solid evidence placing the Middle East and the Arabian Peninsula as the first stepping-stone outside Africa. There is, however, little understanding of demographic changes in the Middle East, particularly the Levant, after the first Out-of-Africa expansion and how the Levantine peoples relate genetically to each other and to their neighbors. In this study we analyze more than 500,000 genome-wide SNPs in 1,341 new samples from the Levant and compare them to samples from 48 populations worldwide. Our results show recent genetic stratifications in the Levant are driven by the religious affiliations of the populations within the region. Cultural changes within the last two millennia appear to have facilitated/maintained admixture between culturally similar populations from the Levant, Arabian Peninsula, and Africa. The same cultural changes seem to have resulted in genetic isolation of other groups by limiting admixture with culturally different neighboring populations. Consequently, Levant populations today fall into two main groups: one sharing more genetic characteristics with modern-day Europeans and Central Asians, and the other with closer genetic affinities to other Middle Easterners and Africans. Finally, we identify a putative Levantine ancestral component that diverged from other Middle Easterners ∼23,700–15,500 years ago during the last glacial period, and diverged from Europeans ∼15,900–9,100 years ago between the last glacial warming and the start of the Neolithic. 

Author Summary 

Population stratification caused by nonrandom mating between groups of the same species is often due to geographical distances leading to physical separation followed by genetic drift of allele frequencies in each group. In humans, population structures are also often driven by geographical barriers or distances; however, humans might also be structured by abstract factors such as culture, a consequence of their reasoning and self-awareness. Religion in particular, is one of the unusual conceptual factors that can drive human population structures. This study explores the Levant, a region flanked by the Middle East and Europe, where individual and population relationships are still strongly influenced by religion. We show that religious affiliation had a strong impact on the genomes of the Levantines. In particular, conversion of the region’s populations to Islam appears to have introduced major rearrangements in populations’ relations through admixture with culturally similar but geographically remote populations, leading to genetic similarities between remarkably distant populations like Jordanians, Moroccans, and Yemenis. Conversely, other populations, like Christians and Druze, became genetically isolated in the new cultural environment. We reconstructed the genetic structure of the Levantines and found that a pre-Islamic expansion Levant was more genetically similar to Europeans than to Middle Easterners. 

These results suggest that population migration to Europe from the Near East could have started after the LGM warming and continued until the Neolithic. In addition, these results show that the modern European genetic component is more recent than would be expected from a component that developed from the initial peopling of Europe in the Upper Paleolithic ∼40,000 y.a.


An Immigration Parable

Conservatism in action.
A rat-faced leering levantine named Moshe Finkelstein talks to square-jawed red state White conservative John Smith.
Finkelstein: Hello, Mr Smith!  I am the new president of the local chamber of commerce, here to talk to you today about economic growth.
Smith: Hello, sir.
Finkelstein: I know you are a good conservative, a fiscal conservative, a patriot, a free market conservative.  You value economic growth, do you not?
Smith: You’re damn right I do!  The business of America is business!  I founded my own company, I’m a “go-getter” and if I can make it, anyone can!  This is the land of opportunity!
Finkelstein: I’m glad you think so.  So, let’s look at opportunities – what if I told you that the Smith family could maximize its economic growth, increase its output, have a better standard of living?
Smith: Keep on talking, I like what I’m hearing!  This is red meat conservatism, I tell ya!
Finkelstein: Now, you admit that others may be even better than you at making money?  Right?  I mean, as you said, if you can make it, anyone can!  
Smith: Sure, it’s a big world out there. I’m proud of what I’ve accomplished, but sure some could do better!  When I go to church the pastor tells us pride is a sin, so I’m not boastful.
Finkelstein: You know, there’s the family in China named Chang – I can prove to you they are better for optimizing economic growth than you, your wife and children.
Smith: Sure, China’s a big country, lots of people. No doubt some are better at business than we Smiths are. So?
Finkelstein: Well, the economic growth of the Smith family would be maximized, the Smith standard of living would be improved, if the Changs come to America, move into your home, replace you, and take over your lives.  Why, they’ll even change their name to Smith!  Mr. Chang will take over your business and the Chang kids – well, now they’re the Smith kids – will take the place of your own children in school. They’ll get better grades, I’ll tell you that for nothing!  Just read Lynn and Derbyshire – good conservatives! – and they’ll tell you!
Smith: Wha?  What happens to us?
Finkelstein: You’re out. Does it matter?  You’re the past.  Just fade away, die out.  Look, just sign on the dotted line here, and we can begin the process of importing the Changs here.  Don’t you care about the well being of the Smith family?  Don’t you want the best growth, the best living standards, for the Smiths?
Smith: But it won’t be us!  Someone else will be benefiting!  All this growth and standards will be accruing to someone else! What difference if they call themselves Chang or Smith?  This is crazy!
Finkelstein (shaking his head sadly): You are really narrow minded, a relic of the past. You  are on the wrong side of history! The future of the Smith family beings to the Changs – what are you, a racist?
Smith: No, but I…,
Finkelstein (pointing and sputtering): I can’t believe what I’m hearing.  Out of your selfishness, your bigotry in favor of your family, your fear of competition, you want to prevent a better qualified family to have the opportunity to build the Smith name, to create new economic growth for the Smiths and for the community!  I’m reporting you!  Racist!  Bigot! Hater!  To your church! The media! The watchdog groups! It’s a hate crime!
Smith: Now, wait, I’m no racist, I just want to protect my family.
Finkelstein: The Changs are your family now.  Why don’t you protect them?  
Smith: I guess you are right.  We’ll prepare to move out, give all we have to the….well, to the Smiths.
Finkelstein: It’ll all turn out right.  Maybe future generations of the new Smiths will listen to country music and watch NASCAR just like you do.  It’s all good!
Smith: I have a question. I’m sure there are other families like the Changs/Smiths.  Maybe the Finkelstein family would benefit by being replaced by them?
Finkelstein: YOU ANTI-SEMITIC SCUM!  Lock him up!  Hate crime! Oy vey, I’ve been assaulted! 

The Tribe Targets Japan Next

He’s not a real “American.”

Notice that Adelstein doesn’t object to actual crimes. He simply wants to criminalize speech—particularly if it involves the defense of an historic nationThis fight is international, whether it involves Hungary, Japan, or the United States. It’s not just about a war on whites anymore. It’s about a war on all peoples who want control over their own destiny—and who think that citizens should decide their own fate, not globalists and their Main Stream Media lackeys.

So, here’s an individual living in Japan, not himself Japanese, with a mission to deconstruct Japan as an ethnoracial nation, coupled with an animus toward free speech in defense of host genetic interests.

I’ll say what the VDARE writer is afraid to say: Adelstein is Jewish (there is a lot about this lousy rat-faced bastard on the Internet, including his conflicts with Japanese gangsters), and thus is following in the footsteps of his co-ethnic destroyers of other peoples’ nations, a group dedicated to decay, degeneration, and chaos (for other folks of course).  Pure poison embodied in an ethnic group and in a culture – a reason why population genetics, physical appearance (although this fellow does have the typical leering Levantine appearance that I’m sure starving Ukrainian kulaks and murdered Russian gulag inmates learned to “appreciate” so well), religion, etc. all do not capture the totality of the problem, which is an existential one of Total Identity – of a group that is constantly and inevitably in conflict with all the other peoples of the Earth, particularly, majority groups trying to live peacefully in their own nations. One need not even look at major issues like communism, the “civil rights” movement in America, and the 1965 Immigration Act, how about Ignatiev and “abolishing the White race,” Ziv and his promotion of miscegenation, Hart and his promotion of a multiracial “White separatist state” (sic!), Weissberg and his call for the “racial status quo,” always the same, always, always, always promoting that which harms the majority ethny the most.  They can’t help themselves – it’s innate.  But the  majority group can help itself, by battling this creeping fungus, this virulent infection.
Indeed, Bowery’s theory of Jewish virulence deserves careful consideration.

After reading that VDARE article, and various online articles, I must say: I’m rooting for the yakuza.