Category: religion

6/8/17: Behold a Hypocrite

Nonsense from a certain weasel-faced hypocrite.

Christianity is the religion of the higher IQ, the more empathic, the bigger-souled, the guilt-based (inner morality); it’s a religion for a people whose impulse is to transcend their human failings and better themselves, rather than to embrace their will to filth and stamp a seal of approval on their avaricious barbarity.

You mean, like: rejecting hedonistic nihilism and promiscuous sex?  You mean like getting married to a woman of your own race and not miscegenating with Negresses with “gravity-defying asses” or with Asiatrixes with wandering fingers?  You mean like “love thy neighbor” as opposed to snarky “shiving?”  This Roissy has to rank among the most outrageous hypocrites on Earth.

Now of course there are exceptions…

Meet Jimmy Wideassmann.

I’m of the opinion that a religion is less an influence on culture and society than it is a manifest revelation of the genetic foundation of the people who profess belief in it.

Absolute nonsense.  

Regrettably, Christianity, like its people, has “out-evolved” itself — it evolved to where it was always logically heading…

So, if Christianity was “always logically heading” to self-destructive Universalist cucking then (1) what good is it?, and (2) what does that say about the “genetic foundation of the people who profess belief in it?”  If we’ve all “out-evolved” our adaptive instructs, what now?  Should we just lay with the aforementioned Negresses and Asiatrixes and leave saving society to “the anti-poolside chumps?”

Those who think the White West can be unyoked from Christianity and not just survive but thrive are fools…

That makes me a fool then.  Or maybe someone who believes we need to move on to the next High Culture.

Christianity can no more be excised from the West than charity, empathy, genius, poetry, and high trust can be cut out from Western societies without permanently altering the character of the people. Discarding Christianity is taking a hatchet to a part of the essence of European man and expecting him to walk off the operating table unchanged…

But, Jimmy, if Whites have evolved past adaptive fitness and are riding the Cuckstianity horse into genetic oblivion, maybe some operating table change is drastically needed?

My opinion: Christianity must be mercilessly destroyed.  Crush the infamy!

Advertisements

Contrasting Ethnocentrisms

Contrasting ethnocentrisms.

One can say that the type of Middle Eastern ethnocentrism noted by many observers as characteristic of that region is formally analogous to the idea of a White ethnostate and the pursuit by Whites of their (very) legitimate racial interests.

But there is a fundamental difference.  Salter has proposed, and I endorse, the idea of Universal Nationalism – that every people have the right to preserve their own uniqueness, both biological and cultural, and this applies to non-Whites as well as Whites.  That’s an enlightened ethnocentrism.

However, on the other hand, Middle Eastern ethnocentrism is characterized by an aggressive dual morality and an expansionist, imperialist mindset.  Thus, one Middle Eastern people strive to be at the top of the human energy pyramid, both parasites and manipulators, those who oppose all nationalism except their own, and those who promote multiracialism and multiculturalism to destroy the West and the White race. Another group of Middle Easterners – and other non-Whites who follow a Middle Eastern High Culture – wish to colonize the West through their mass migration and impose their own civilization on Westerners, both a demographic and a cultural form of colonizing imperialism.  Thus, in contrast to Europeans, the well-known ethnocentrism of the Middle Eastern High Culture is aggressively particularistic and definitely not universal.  Universalism it seems is a trait of the West and of the West only.

Der Movement in Der News, 5/2/17

Der Movement marches on.

Another rambling Costello piece.  Is the picture accompanying the piece that of Jef serving breakfast to the Goddess and Lioness Mudshark Annie?  That after she’s spent the night with Dinesh.

This Spencer piece was good until the end:


Trump seems unburdened by this political theology. This indicates that, despite his failings, he remains “uncucked” in his heart of hearts.

I was going to really blast that, but I see a commentator beat me to it:

Robert Bruce • 8 hours ago

Are you frigging kidding me? The guy says some nice words to placate the anti war paleoconservatives and alt right and his heart is “uncucked”? The guy talks out of both sides of his mouth!!!!!!! Please get real, and I would distance myself a tad from Trump. Haven’t you already hurt your cause by joining yourself at the hip with him in the beginning? No more brothers wars huh? It looks like his group sure wants to take out Russia in the not too distant future. Talk is cheap, very cheap. The guy’s main job is to keep everyone on edge and confused if he is the real deal or not, well he isn’t. His job is to implode the GOP. I am embarrassed that I felt compelled to vote for this guy. The article was very good, except the ending. You can’t really tell if this guy is sincere is my point.

This is a fundamental problem I have with the “movement” in general, and the Alt Right in particular: these guys never learn their lesion, and they have impaired judgment.  How many times do you need to be smacked in the face by betrayal by your Man on White Horse before you give up on it?  If some passing Trump rambling comments on the Civil War get you all worked up, I can quote Fat Don on denouncing “racism” and “anti-Semitism” and crying about the “Holocaust.”   Does this guy Trump really have a “heart of hearts?” I’m beginning to doubt it.  There’s no “there” there.  He’s an empty vessel, nowadays mostly being filled up by Neocon drivel.

I’m not surprised that a “libertarian” promotes this absolute nonsense.

Putting aside for the moment whether Christianity can serve as today as a vehicle for racial interests, we can ask whether it (or any other religion) can serve as a basis for modern society.  Are we really supposed to build a worldview on some Jewish myth about how Jaysus is going to save us, the “son of god” who rose from the dead?  Wen Nietzsche said “God is Dead” that was meant metaphorically, that belief in Christianity was lost in a modern, scientifically literate, technologically growing age.  Can educated people – ones who are not delusional of conformist cucks – really believe any of this nonsense?  Are we supposed to believe in Daddy Sky God (Yahweh or Odin or Zeus or whoever) and his son (Jesus or Thor or Hercules or whoever) and take any of this seriously. Or, like an Amren Christian promoter long ago, do we tell people that they need to go to church and feign belief?  That’s great – a society built on lies and fantasy that lots of people pretend they believe in.  That’s the foundation for long-term stability, I tell ya!

All of that could even be stomached in Christianity served EGI in today’s age, but it does not.  You cannot turn back the historical clock.  In today’s globalist age, a Universalist religion now includes, practically speaking, all of humanity.  And even if somehow you could turn the clock back and recreate a “muscular Christianity” is it worth the effort?  After all that struggle, you’ll end up with a fantasy that educated and rational people secretly mock in their hearts, a religion with an inner core of universalism that always contains the danger of getting cucked again, a religion that always has to be controlled to keep its universalist elements restrained.  How about just growing up, moving forward, and stop trying to revive dead aspects of a passing High Culture?  How about planting the seeds of a new High Culture?

And, personally, I see religious Whites as being mentally weak; unable to face realty as it is, they need comforting fantasies, and unable to act as morally independent adults, they need Big Daddy and his earthly priestly minions to provide guidance. That may be suitable for the unwashed masses, but I thought that “truth-telling” racialists were supposed to know better.

Greg is correct about “trans” here.  If someone has the delusion that they are Napoleon, the correct approach is to cure them of their delusion; you don’t send them put to fight the Battle of Waterloo.

Two Items, 1/7/17

Two items.

Another excellent Hood article, summarizing the world gone mad we find ourselves in.

Why Christianity must be mercilessly destroyed.  This religion of beta race cucks (shall we rename it Cuckinsanity?), a religion of weaklings and losers, a religion of lazy free-riders who need to import those aliens they want to “mission to” (and how well is that coming along, idiots?) – this backwards desert religion foisted upon us by hook-nosed levantine migrants (but with wonderfully high IQs! – but I guess those high IQs came later) – can we be rid of this Culture Distortion burden on us?

And for those nitwits who want to distinguish today’s weakling Cuckinsanity from “Traditional Christianity” I note the following.  Even at the height of “muscular Traditional Christianity defending Europe” the idea, ultimately, was conversion and assimilation.  The problem the Crusaders had with Muslims was simply their religion.  If the NECs had converted – presto! – problem gone. Or are the mendacious pro-Christian brigade going to lie to us and tell us that Christian resistance to the Moors and Saracens and Turks was “racial?”  It was not.  The only reason why conversion and assimilation failed in that instance is that Muslims have a strong faith and they stick with their beliefs, they want to convert us, they don’t want to be converted by us (which is why all the current “Christian missioning” is a pathetic joke).

Crush the infamy!

Racial Odds and Ends, 12/15/16

Items and observations.

Observation: The ethnonationalists of Europe show more genuine pan-European cooperation than do the so-called “pan-Aryan” factions of the American “movement.”

While I am loathe to buy into the notion of the “superiority” of European compared to. American activism, there is an argument to be made in favor of such superiority.

We stand for a Europe of sovereign nations in which the independent states work together on a confederated basis to address the great challenges of our time …

Liberals before election: Trump not accepting the outcome of the election threatens the very fabric of our democracy!

Liberals after election: Trump saying that we should accept the outcome of the election threatens the very fabric of our democracy!  We need to investigate, investigate, and investigate!

Leftist hypocrisy is breathtaking, but it does wonders to promote the Sallis Strategy, so, yes please, keep it coming.  The Left is doubling down on all the behavior that caused folks to flock to the vulgar buffoon Trump; the Left is congenitally unable to learn from its mistakes, because such learning conflicts with its ultimate foundation: hatred of Whites and of the West (which is why Asians vote liberal Democrat).

The Left would respond that Trump is being hypocritical as well, now quick to accept the vote’s legitimacy since he won.  My own riposte to that is if you want an “investigation” into the election, then “investigate” everything, not just “Russian hacking.”  Let’s investigate media collusion with the DNC and the Clinton campaign, as well as illegal alien voting and busing voters across state lines, thugs hired to disrupt Trump rallies, and countries such as Mexico attempting to influence voting in Clinton’s favor.

Pareto principle again.

All those folks attacking Spencer about “Hailgate” – how about listening to how he effectively answers that rabbi?  What would should he have done instead?  Talk about Pepe and Kek?  About Savitri Devi and Kali Yuga?  Sub-fractional admixture percentages or the cephalic index of Julius Caesar?  I’m critical of Spencer where it is warranted, but the Hailgate Hysteria says more about the hysterics than it ever does, or did, about Spencer himself.  Who else is an effective WN spokesman?  Alt Wrong folks who would have groveled to the rabbi and praised the Jews as huWhite men of the West?

If Spencer does real wrong, I’ll criticize him, but the current attacks are simply stupid and self-destructive tearing down of someone who may evolve into an effective White leader.

A different, non-Der Movement view of “St. Lucy’s Day” with a (unfortunate from Der Movement’s perspective) pan-European focus. Down the memory hole with dem dere inconvenient facts!

And guess what – pagan pre-Christian influences in “Christian festivals” are found throughout Europe, not only in Der Movement’s favorite parts.

Unfortunately, unlike NEC flim-flam, verbal and physical attacks against Whites are not hoaxes.

Alt Wrong hypocrisy: On the one hand, they tell us that we cannot blame Jews for America’s racial problems because Jews are such a small percentage of the population; on the other hand, they tell us it is vitally important that we have Jewish support (“you need at least some of the powerful and wealthy New York Jews”) because Jews are so influential and we cannot succeed without them. Even the most fundamentally dishonest Alt Wronger must know that we can see through their mendacity.

Durocher Exposed, 9/23/16

Two contrasting posts.

Here Durocher criticizes science as “profane,” endorsing in contrast a religion of “esoteric Hitlerism.”

Here, Durocher immerses himself in population genetics science – with the expected lies and distortions – to promote division within the White race.

So, which is it?  Is science “profane,” or something that you fondle fetishistically to pursue anti-WN agendas?

Similarly, Durocher considers fascism good or bad depending on the whim and context, or promotes mainstreaming one day and radical Hitlerism the next.

The analogies with Silver are striking: both are chameleon-like frauds, with a destructive anti-WN agenda.

 


			

More Than Minimal Daylight

The fraud proven wrong once again.

Silver previously described me as “insane” due to my critiques of Durocher, because as Silver asserted:

But there’s minimal daylight between his own position and Durocher’s, when you get down to the brass tacks. 

Now, I believe that I’ve already outlined the glaring daylight – the solar mass – between my position and that of Durocher, but more data are always welcome. So, let’s see some more on how Silver is – as usual – completely wrong.
Here is Durocher’s latest screed; we can look at relevant excerpts and discern how the “minimal daylight” is far from minimal”:

All militant atheists should be given Darwin Awards.


I am a militant atheist. Now, I’m not offended by Durocher’s comment, any more that am offended by Captain Chaos’ retarded yapping at Majority Rights (“Michael Ravioli”). Nevertheless, can it be admitted that Durocher’s comment, coupled to my extreme scientific-materialist atheism, means that there is indeed a very wide gulf between our respective worldviews?

Logically, all this ends in either World-Judaism and/or Islam or esoteric Hitlerism.


So, if not Judaism or Islam, we all need to believe in gnostic esoteric fantasies, that Saint Adolf, The Man Who Can’t Tell Time, is piloting a flying saucer through the ruins of Atlantis – or is it in the “secret Antarctic Nazi fortress?” – “Hyperborea or Ultima Thule?” – “Mars?”

The advent of agriculture led to a spiritual crisis and religious change, as must the advent of modern technology. We need a new religion. Fascism was an attempt, smothered with hate-filled fanaticism. Late liberalism is a half-orgiastic/half-life-fearing effeminate death cult.


Fascism, according to Durocher, is bad, “smothered with hate-filled fanaticism.” We must have religious esoteric Hitlerism instead. I am a fascist and an atheist who thinks “esoteric Hitlerism” ranks among the most stupid horseshit imaginable. Can a normal and honest person (a category which necessarily excludes Silver) therefore conclude that there is in fact an enormous gulf between the Sallis and Durocher worldviews?  Yes.

But one should not limit oneself to a profane scientific approach.


According to Durocher, science is “profane.” I endorse the scientific approach. Does anyone still listen to Silver?

Eliade is astonishingly optimistic in the film. I guess those 1980s New Age movements and Westerners’ dabbling in Buddhism were hopeful signs? Eliade is convinced that a return to sacred convictions would lead to great existential improvement and to cultural creativity, from poetry to the sciences. (I think he is absolutely right.)


I think Eliade is absolutely wrong. Tell me again how there is virtually no difference between Sallis and Durocher?

Women have a much stronger intuitive sense of health and the good life than men…

I agree with the gamesters that women are child-like, indulging in deception and self-deception; women are in large part responsible for the degeneracy of the modern West. Thus, I 100% disagree with Durocher.

Hence, your modern yuppie gal — though raised on Sex and the City — will go to yoga and earnestly chant an “ohm!” of surprising power. Health and spirit are calling her.


Can anyone familiar with my work and worldview think I would endorse the laughable lunacy of the preceding two sentences?

Obviously men should be coming forward to found a new faith.

Yes, but not a religious one.

We salute you Mircea Eliade, Aryan mystic, loyal in a dark age to the faith of your forefathers.


I laugh at you Mircea Eliade: childish buffoon, loyal to pathetic fantasies because you are too weak-minded to face harsh reality, betraying your forefathers by burying your head in the sand of imbecilic esoterica while race and civilization collapse around you.

Durocher? My opinion of him – rather, the specific Durocher incarnation – is well known, and my critiques are based on an utterly incompatible worldview, not “insanity.”
Readers of this post may agree with me, or they may agree with Durocher, but I would hope that none agree with Silver, who once again is exposed as a liar, a fraud, a mendacious twister of facts, an obvious distorter of reality.