Category: revolutionary violence

Morgan and Other News

“Movement” stupidity.

The Type Is are doing their best to destroy whatever little is left of a credible racialist “movement” in America.

But, hey, don’t listen to the criticisms of this blog.  Keep on supporting Type I retardation, sweaty fetishism, fossilized dogma, and send those “D’Nations” to “leaders” for their European travels, gym memberships, movie nights out, and comfy lawn chairs for their homes in blue state suburbs.  Money well spent!

The fundamentally dishonest John Morgan:

I realize this is beside your main point, but legally speaking I am a Hungarian, as my mother’s ancestors, although Transylvania Saxons (ethnic Germans), were citizens of the Hungarian Kingdom for 800 years, and moreover my mother’s parents were born in Transylvania before the Trianon Treaty, which ceded Transylvania to Romania from Hungary, so under the law I am just as Hungarian as anyone else, even if I’m not ethnically Magyar. If I tell most Hungarians I am Transylvania Saxon, they just say, “That’s Hungarian.”

Yeah, that’s great.  Uh…you are of Anglo-Germanic ancestry, and are living in a country whose majority is ethnic Hungarian (that the origins of that ethny are “mixed” is irrelevant to the present existence of their ethnic identity).  “Legally speaking” you are Hungarian!  Great!  Legally speaking a ghetto Negro is an “American.”  And their ancestors were here for centuries. Legally speaking a Turk in Berlin is “German.” And you can find White Americans who will look at a Negro and say – “That’s American.” What nonsense.  And even if you want to call Morgan’s maternal line “Hungarian,” what about the paternal line? Or are “halfsies” now acceptable to ethnonationalists?  Something to debate about snug in your hobbit holes.

The reality: Morgan is an ethnonationalist living in someone else’s country – “legally” or not.  A hypocrite.

And as regards Morgan’s contention that Hungarians are “undeniably” of “Central Asian origin” – at most perhaps a few percentage points of their ancestry is such. For the most part, they are not that much different from their Central European neighbors.

I have no idea what percentage of the American radical Right has pan-Europeanist sentiments…

Superficially and dishonestly, some reasonable fraction. Honestly and authentically, maybe 1% – or less.

TOO Retard:

 <Cam OT>, <Andrew>, and Richard McCulloch all take me to task for excluding indigenous (ethnic) Russians from the White race.  This is not a major issue for me, and I have no serious objection to including them.  

I’m sure they’re relieved.  After all, it’s up to you to decide on the racial provenance of Russians.

My primary rational for excluding them was that, even though they may have some Scandinavian blood…

The only important thing of course. But not enough such blood to qualify for automatic passing of “extreme vetting.”

…that Russians are not truly Europeans…

Stating that makes it true.  “Movement” solipsism in action.

…and have not contributed to human intellectual and cultural life to the extent that Europeans have.  

We can name any number of groups that this author would worship that have contributed less than Russians have.

Also, there is so much racial admixture there that I wonder how White they truly are—a point nicely made by <PJ Dooner> later in the comment chain.  

A comment made by some random fetishist is obviously solid evidence.

This is certainly an area ripe for more research and study.

Crack open your copy of March of the Titans!

But if we want to include 110 million ethnic Russians, along with some 35 million Ukrainians and around 8 million Byelorussians, I have no major objection.  This, though, makes the ‘genocide’ theme even less tenable, because there are now some 950 million Whites globally.  Do <Cam OT>, Andrew, and Richard really want to go there?

Definitely evidence of the non-“Whiteness” of Russians right there!

Advertisements

8/12/19 News

News.

Does anyone see a common thread in these stories?  The Ames story alone would fit in well with The Good Shepherd, but not in the manner in which Der Movement obsesses over that movie – or, shall we say, one particular scene in that movie.

Der Movement, Der Movement, Der Movement marches on.

And the other shoe drops.

So much winning!

The current state of the “movement” – what an unmitigated disaster.  On the morning of Nov. 9, 2016, there were virtually unlimited opportunities for the “movement.”  There was enormous potential and it was all squandered, everything has been ruined – ruined by the Type I retards who make up the bulk of the rank-and-file and ruined even more by their affirmative action leadership, pathetic losers and professional failures whose only qualification for “movement leadership” is their ethnic background. 

And with all the serious issues as stake, “movement” “activists” are busy concentrating on what they perceive as crucially important matters – such as attempting to distort archaeogenetics findings even before they are published.

Reading online genetics forums, it seems like all my predictions about Der Movement’s reactions to the forthcoming Rome paper are coming true even before it is published.  The fetishists are foaming at the mouth, retconning their dogma with a vengeance.

Interestingly, many of these fetishists are Poles, who apparently believe that they’ll be accepted by NW Euros if they parrot then dogma even more vehemently than NW Euros do.  Fat chance of that.

Thus, the fetishists are pretending that the dogma was never that the Ancient Greeks and Romans (and Egyptians!) were Nordic. Oh no, perish the thought, that’s all down the memory hole.

Now, it’s that the Northern Italian-like real Romans were replaced (genocide!) by greasy Sicilian-like MENA immigrants.  And, of course, they say that assaying Ancient Rome is no different from assaying New York City – unless of course the findings were compatible with the original dogma and then they’d be crowing about the results and how “representative” they were.

The lesson here is that no matter what the findings of archaeogenetics, the fetishists will NEVER admit to being wrong. If a study demonstrated that King Leonidas was akin to a Nigerian, the fetishists would proclaim “Arthur Kemp was right!” – after all, in this scenario, Leonidas would be genetically distinct from modern Greeks, and wasn’t that all Kemp was saying?  Get with the program!  The fundamental dishonesty of these types is laughable.

Good to see that the Type Is have a good division of labor thing going on here.  Some of them keep busy retconning their disproved dogmas in truly Orwellian fashion, while others shoot up Walmarts and plan bombings, or look at child porn, which a certain VDARE contributor thinks should not be illegal.  

All of this is the direct outcome of Der Movement’s strict affirmative action policy.  Keep on enabling it, all you imbeciles out there.  And keep sending in those “D’Nations” to your “leaders” – after all, how else are they going to go on their trips to Europe while you sit in your parents’ basement, onanistically reveling over Durocher’s latest Unz posts?

El Paso and Rome in Der News

Related whether you realize it or not.

Recently, I told what I see as the truth about the El Paso shooting. Taylor has released a reasonably good video that is consistent with half of what I write – the part about the System and its hypocrisy, as well as that the System’s all-too-predictable reaction will only amplify the situation and make it worse, increasing, not decreasing, the probability of further violence.  The part where I also blame the “movement” because of its ineptness and history of constant failure was not discussed, but I didn’t expect that it would be.

Reading more online reaction to the upcoming Ancient Rome genetic study – that according to these commentators may not be released before next year at earliest (but who knows?) – I am getting a good idea about the approach that Der Movement is going to take here.  Allegedly, these people claim that the Iron Age Italian population, Etruscans, Samnites, etc. were shifted more in the NW direction compared to, say, the Imperial period, so that the former were more “West Med” and the latter drifting more in the direction of “East Med.”  One could suppose one scenario in which some Italic tribes moved into the peninsula from the north, being more similar to today’s Iberians and Southern French, and then subsequent population movement’s from the circum-Mediterranean region shifted the “centroid” more in the S. Italian direction.

I previously commented on this:

…the essential Der Movement narrative is not supported.  The only point of agreement (that no one has ever substantially argued against) is that the city of Rome (and some other areas) became more cosmopolitan during the Imperial Era. That there were migrants and slaves in the city is well known.  However, these data paint a crude genetic picture of a Republican Rome whose genetic centroid was Central Italian, a more Southern Italian Imperial and Late Antiquity Rome, and then shifting back to Central Italian in more modern times.

Without seeing the actual paper, it is difficult to comment in details; dealing with breathless accounts of “leaked PCAs,” it is difficult to any conclusions.  However, most probably, Der Movement’s strategy is going to be to concentrate on the fact that there was changes in the population composition over periods of centuries and millennia, an obvious process amplified by the cosmopolitan status of Rome, as well as known Greek influences from Rome southwards – while ignoring the fundamental “movement” thesis of a Nordic Rome in which the population was completely replaced by Levantines and other non-Europeans.  The original thesis will be shelved and West Med to East Med shifts (to the extend they occurred) put in its place.

Another point. Although PCA can be, with the correct computational approaches, be used to estimate ancestral proportions, etc., in and of itself, just looking at positions of samples, one cannot make determinations of ancestral origins per se.   That two samples are placed similarly in a PCA does not necessarily imply similar ancestral origins (although wide difference in position does suggest probably significant differences in at least some components of ancestry). As a purely hypothetical example, a person who is half Russian and half-Palestinian may cluster similar to Italians along clines of gene frequencies; this does not mean that Italians are half Russian and half Palestinian. One must distinguish centroids from individuals, and the presence of inhomogeneous elements from others – whether sample centroids shift due to the presence of individual outlier samples or because of actual admixture.  The direct relevance of all of this to genetic kinship and EGI is zero.

Finally, there is a connection between the first and last sections of this post.  If Der Movement was more concerned about the serious issues facing Whites today, instead of obsessing over the racial provenance of Plato and Julius Caesar, we wouldn’t have to waste time with issues of ancient genetics and instead focus on more relevant and pressing issues.  Again, that’s why Der Movement is partially responsible for El Paso.

More Movement Stupidity and Hypocrisy

In der news.

My riposte to this is as follows:

Press release!  Author of EGI Notes blames Greg Johnson (and other failed “movement leaders”) for El Paso shooting.

This is correct, but doesn’t go far enough. How about denouncing all the hysterical cheerleaders for Trump on the Alt Right?  The last chance for White America!  MAGA! Pepe! Kek!

More stupidity.  ‘White genes.”  Russians are “not White.”  Nitpicking over “genocide.” Completely unrealistic proposals.  Is it any wonder the mentally weak throw their hands up in despair and go shoot up something?  Der Movement is a pathetic embarrassing failure.

And then we have:

PJ Dooner says:
August 3, 2019 at 11:50 am
He might believe that Russia is mongrelized beyond repair: two of the policies that the jews implemented when they took over Russia a hundred years ago was to relocate huge numbers of “Russians” from more eastern areas into purely Slavic areas and outright mass murder of pure Slavs as in in Ukraine and of the ethnic Germans in the Volga area-the result is an enormous mixed-race population of Eurasian-Russians today–take a close look at the “Russians” you see on TV or the net, they almost all look mixed-race like Putin’s first wife, for example.

Unlike David Bromstad and family, or Bjork, who don’t look even the slightest Eurasian, right?  Mote and beam.  Look in your own eye, fetishists.

Uh-huh.  Note the discussion of alien civilizations at around the 50 minute mark.  My riposte is this.  That’s from 2018…the same year as the Wit’s End book.  Let’s see if the HBDers claim to have been the only ones to have invented this hypothesis.  A form of affirmative action I suppose; just like Blacks “invented” everything, the Quota Queens can do the same.

Not bad, not bad…figuring out in 2019 what I was telling all of you in 2016, before the election.

Other folks in 2016. Hail Trump!  MAGA!  Pepe!  Kek!

Them in 2019.

Looking at online discussion about the upcoming paper on Ancient Roman genetics, including mention of a “leaked PCA,” we see that Der Movement Strikes Back, desperately trying to save the dogma by wild interpretations.  You know, whether or not the Etruscans and Iron Age Italics clustered with Spaniards and whether later-age Romans clustered with South Italians (Genocide!  Levantine admixture!  Genocide!), I’ve yet to see anyone claim that any of these samples, from any era, cluster with Northern Europe. I thought the original ancients were all Nordic?  If the essential cline of Ancient Rome extends through the entire North Mediterranean basin – otherwise known as Southern Europe – that’s a refutation of the main points of “movement” dogma. That a cosmopolitan metropolis like Ancient Rome saw some population shifts as the capital of an empire is not surprising.  That’s not the point. The point is the official “movement” dogma that the original Romans were Dolph Lundgren in a toga, and there’s no evidence of that.  If there was a shift from Franco to Evola over time, that’s hardly SPQR Leif Erikson. I suppose that Der Movement will continue to retcon their dogma. Don’t let them do it. That’s putting aside the irrelevance of all of this to EGI-based biopolitics in 2019 – that’s 2019 AD, not 2019 BC.  But, Der Movement is going to be Der Movement and there’s no getting around it.

The Unvarnished Truth about Recent Events

El Paso: Ideology vs. terrorism.

See thisAnd this.

See this.

And also this.

This is the reality: Only at EGI Notes will you hear the unvarnished truth about these events.  You will certainly not hear it from the System, with its hypocritical moral posturing and hysterical virtue signaling.  You will not hear it from a self-serving and inept “movement” either.

Truth: These events are basically cries for help, cries of desperation from White men who have been dumped on by the System and shit upon by society, men who believe, with justification, that their interests cannot be advanced through the political process, men who feel abandoned by everyone, including by a comically inept “movement” that has failed them time and again and that offers them nothing except disaster, defeat, and humiliation. 

 

The reaction to these events, from both the System and the “movement,” will do nothing but legitimize and amplify these feelings, will do nothing except increase the alienation of these people, will do nothing except make more events like what we have seen more likely.

More White men, particularly the youth, will observe the universal cries of condemnation of Whites, White interests, and everything these men stand for.  More will become radicalized. There will be zero – ZERO – calls for any understanding of these men, or concern about “backlash” – concern that always occurs with terror attacks by non-Whites. The System, already hostile to White interests, will become more hostile.  The political process, closed off to expressions of White interests, will become more closed off. The desperation and alienation of these men will be mocked, ridiculed, and labeled “evil.” Meanwhile, the “movement” will take no responsibility for having failed these men, and will react with self-serving podcasts and blog posts (perhaps with tin cup rattling for “D’Nations”); endorsements of Princess Tulsi Coconut and Andy Eggroll; and discussions about cephalic indices, racial admixture in Southern and Eastern Europe, Savitri Devi and Kali Yuga, and all the rest of the retarded stupidity that results in concerned young men realizing that the tragicomedy of “American White nationalism” has nothing to offer to them.

The validity of this truth will be confirmed by three facts:

1. There will be not a single mainstream politician or any other prominent person who will publicly declare that these unfortunate events occur because the System is hostile to White interests and desperate people believe that these interests cannot be addressed via the political process.  No one from the mainstream will state that we need to incorporate White interests – White racial interests – into public policy discussion.

2. There will be no pro-White “movement leader” who will be given a fair, respectful, and reasoned forum to explain these issues to the public, followed by a sincere and authentic consideration of these issues and their implications.

3. No pro-White “movement leader” will publicly accept responsibility and accountability for endless failure, this failure leading activists feeling so desperate that they lash out in a destructive manner.

You know this to be true, right?

Let’s consider System hypocrisy in all of this, and the confusion between beliefs and actions, a confusion that exists only when applied to beliefs that promote White interests. Remember congressional hearings about “White supremacism” and comments by Presidential candidates about the so-called dangers of “White nationalism.”

There’s a difference between an ideology, a belief system (that can include religion) and terrorism that may be related to that ideology.  From a law enforcement, legal, and public safety standpoint, the issue has to be with actions and with people and groups who plan and commit those actions, not with underlying ideologies that are assumed, or professed, to be the alleged impetus for those actions.

Some examples will suffice.  Assume a person or group attacks an abortion clinic based on professed Christian belief.  We may call the actors terrorists and the acts terrorism, but what public figure would then proceed to call Christianity itself terrorism? When Muslims commit terrorism, the System is careful to distinguish between the terrorists and the religion that they practice. When leftists were committing terrorist outrages in 1960s and 1970s America on a regular basis, Marxist professors were allowed to promote their ideology on American campuses. Even when people like Ted Cruz are pushing (with justification) for Antifa to be declared a terrorist group, they refer to that informal organization and its adherents, and the actions they plan and perform. These conservatives are NOT labeling Marxism or Anarchism as terrorism.

In every case, a clear distinction is made between an ideology, a belief system, a religion, and anyone or any group committing terrorism ostensibly on behalf of those memetic systems.

Now we have people screeching about “White nationalist” and “White supremacist” terrorism.  Of course, a clear distinction between beliefs and acts is NOT being made in this case. That’s not surprising because the entire raison d’etre of the System is hatred of Whites and repression of White interests. The “Great Replacement” is not a “conspiracy theory” but demonstrative fact; even the United Nations openly calls for “replacement migration.”  And The Great Replacement is a major objective of the System; thus, do you expect them to be honest about dissidents to this objective?  One should not be surprised by the hypocrisy and double standards here – random “lone wolf” attacks (with NO underlying organizational structure behind them) are being used to smear an ideology, while in all the previous cases, where the connection between ideology and terrorist organization is much more developed, the underlying ideologies were always left sacrosanct.

Thus, Antifa is a terrorist organization based on Marxist and anarchist beliefs, which themselves are not being labeled as terrorism, or even any sort of danger to America. To be consistent, if any WN organization exists that plans and executes acts of political violence, then such an organizing is terrorist, but the underlying ideology is not.  Lone wolf attackers are terrorists, but whatever belief system they profess is not.  An alleged “free society” like America must make distinctions between belief and action.

This by no means takes Der Movement off the hook for its stupidity.  But that stupidity is not criminal, it is not terrorism, it is something to be adjudicated internally, by the rank-and-file abandoning the failed “leadership” and abandoning the failed dogmas.

Once again, I’m calling out Der Movement.  It is NOT – repeat NOT – true that “movement” rhetoric is promoting such actions. Instead, I posit that “movement” ineptitude can make people frustrated and they develop the feeling that “acting out” is their only option.  If there was a real movement that could absorb the activist energies of young White men and put those energies to good use, these things would not happen.  Instead we have a “movement leadership” consisting of retards, perverts, grifters, and incompetent affirmative action cases. We have “leaders” that refuse to fully accept responsibility for their failures.


Laughably self-unaware. Rewritten:

I blame Greg Johnson and the other Quota Queens for the #ElPasoTerroristAttack. If they had built a viable movement and stopped the litany of endless failure, Patrick Crusius would not have committed this desperate act.

Repeating the same post over and over again with different names and locations filled in doesn’t deal with the situation. It doesn’t address the fundamental issue of responsibility and accountability for failures more long-standing than those of Trump.  Is this “leadership?”

And – coming back to the System – the politicians denouncing “White nationalism” actually are promoting, not inhibiting, further violence, as they leave desperate Whites with the impression that there is no hope for promoting their interests through the political process. People have given up viewing the System as legitimate and have given up on any chances of reform.  All of the moral posturing and virtue signaling is increasing the chances of the very thing they ostensibly oppose and denounce.

Basically, it all boils down to this – young White men are increasingly giving up on the System as they do not believe that their interests can be advanced through participation in the political process. They are also giving up on the idea that their interests can be advanced by the retards, perverts, morons, and grifters that make up Der Movement.  No one is offering real solutions to this problem. The System’s “solutions” will only make it worse (intentionally?).  Der Movement is incapable of offering any real solutions.  This problem will not go away. Expect more such tragedies.  Expect to hear the truth only at this blog and nowhere else.

Delusional Thinking, 7/18/19

From Counter-Currents.

Delusional thinking:

If the group ramps up attacks on government facilities, you can expect the Trump administration to do something about it. 

No, I expect Trump to tweet that he’s “monitoring the situation,” and then do nothing.  On the other hand, any rightists who defend themselves against Antifa will have Trump’s DOJ come down on them like a ton of bricks.

While journalists won’t care, the feds will. Their attacks might be enough to get the group classified as a domestic terror group and for federal agencies to dedicate resources to their suppression. 

Does the author of this piece really believe this?

It would be a serious blow to their movement if a dozen black bloc members were hit with unimpeachable federal charges.

It’s more likely that the author of this piece is “hit” with “hate speech” charges than it is for an Antifa terrorist to be “hit” even with a powder puff.

Antifa terrorism may also radicalize Middle America. If they see politicians being attacked and government buildings torched, they will not think moderation is the answer. Middle Americans will demand a strong state response and view Leftists as their mortal enemies, not as fellow countrymen. 

No, they’ll continue to watch Negro behemoths run into each other on a football field.

Left-wing violence polarizes the nation and chips away at the center’s façade of civility. And the “Nazi” slur will lose its power if cops, soldiers, federal employees, and Trump voters are all called that and in turn deemed worthy of assault. If Middle America feels threatened, they certainly won’t turn to Mitt Romney for salvation.

No, instead they’ll turn to Warren or Harris.

Antifa terrorism is a danger to the country and our movement. In the near future, we will see American Leftists emulate their European comrades by undertaking more aggressive actions. German antifa plans to hunt down and assault known Right-wingers next week. We could very well see something like that in America. This escalation will make life more difficult for our movement, but also backfire for antifa.

It won’t backfire.

As Van Spronsen learned, the American state will not tolerate violent attacks against it. The media coddling of antifa will in fact encourage them to be more reckless and stupid – and eventually, it will come back to haunt them.

It won’t.

Antifa won’t remain untouchable for long.

I’ll believe it when I see it.  Until then, this is all wishful thinking and hot air.  And that last sentence leads to a very important question – why is Antifa untouchable now?

I hope everyone realizes that there is nothing – absolutely nothing – stopping Fat Don, as President and head of federal law enforcement, from going, right now, to his Attorney General, and to the head of the FBI, and saying: “Look, this Antifa problem is getting out of hand, I want something done about it, and done right now.  These are domestic terrorists, we need to crack down on them, and we need to put a stop to this. And for godssakes, you can start by stop letting them get away with attacking people in the streets with impunity, stop letting them violate anti-mask laws with impunity, and stop letting them violate people’s civil rights with impunity. Why the hell haven’t you been doing this already? Why do you have to wait until I order you to do it?  Get moving right now!”

He can do that, but he won’t. You very well know he won’t. Constant attacks against his own supporters haven’t done it.  Armed groups training and openly espousing terrorism hasn’t done it. International armed interventions hasn’t done it. Attacks against federal facilities hasn’t done it. He’s not going to do it; whether it is out of sheer laziness, stupidity, a lack of concern, or secret agreement with Antifa objectives, Trump simply will not act.

Now, ”will not act” is, granted, a bit of hyperbole. I am sure that there must be something that Antifa can do to trigger Trump into action (yes, I know that putting “Trump” and “action” in the same sentence is somewhat oxymoronic). Perhaps if Antifa detonates a nuclear device on American soil, Trump may decide to more aggressively “monitor the situation.” Even worse from his perspective, if Antifa vandalizes Trump’s favorite MacDonald’s, or sucker punches someone close to him, or throws milkshakes at “Diamond” and “Silk,” Trump may be stirred into action.  Maybe even continued Antifa attacks on federal facilities may stir some semblance of activity in the shambling lump of quivering lard that has to be pointed out to thoughtful foreign observers as President of the United States.  Who knows? So, no, it is not literally true that “Trump simply will not act” – instead it is true that “Trump simply will not act” in response to provocations that any other previous President, or any reasonable person, would have long ago responded to.

I don’t know what’s more silly – the idea of an energetic Trump raining wrathful justice down on Antifa, or the idea that Antifa truly believes that Trump is a “fascist” and that they themselves are “dissidents” “fighting the system.”  Hasn’t it crossed what passes for their minds yet that the System – including Trump and his administration – are either passively enabling Antifa through inaction (Trump) or actually supporting and praising them (international corporations, Democrat politicians, academics)?  I honestly believe the Left is more delusional than is the Right. If Trump is a “Far Right Fascist” why does he do nothing about Antifa while allowing his DOJ to persecute rightists like RAM?  If America is a fascistic White Supremacist State why can Antifa rampage with impunity and violate laws at will with virtually no consequences? Can all of this get any more ludicrous?

A Duel of Wits

Between unarmed opponents.

See this.

There is some good here, but also considerable nonsense. If the characterization of Richard Spencer’s racial views is correct, then Johnson’s racial views are sounder from an empiricist-materialist standpoint. However, there is much lacking here from a more hardcore scientific standpoint (the wages of “Traditionalism” I suppose). 

The whole “transplanted brains” scenario is absurd and meaningless intellectual masturbation.  What could one do? There are racial – and subracial (cue Durocher’s heavy breathing) – differences in brain structure that can be identified via imaging methodology.  If one were really determined to obtain a definitive identification, a small brain biopsy can yield DNA to assay for genetic ancestry and thus prove whether or not the brain tissue was of Negro origin. As far as the ridiculous question as to why build a community on race instead of other characteristics, I point both interviewer and interviewee to Salter’s On Genetic Interests. Adaptive fitness is the ultimate interest of evolved organisms (such as humans), and any group that promotes their ultimate interests will outcompete and replace those who do not. And, after all, one can always form these narrower communities within your racial group while preserving EGI, but the opposite is not possible.  One can form your little group of Tolkien fans among Whites in an all-White ethnostate, but a multi-racial Tolkien group that is not stratified by race (by definition, if it is multiracial and stratified only by Tolkienism, it will not be stratified by race) will constitute a loss of genetic interest.  Smaller groups within a White ethnostate will retain the advantages of a concentrated EGI; on the other hand, smaller groups of Whites in, say, a multiracial Tolkien Fanboy state, will suffer as a result of a loss of EGI, itself a consequence of the multiracialism of such a state. In the latter case, the situation can be retrieved only by racial separation – so why not  divide on the basis of race to begin with?

Stupidity about gender-specific nations also fails – I remember Bowery writing (correctly) long ago that gender/sex is not a genetic interest.  A man has more genetic commonality with female relatives and co-ethnics than with male non-ethnic strangers. One could subdivide a racially pure state by gender (for what purpose?) but the racial stratification must come first if one is concerned with biological fitness. If you are not concerned with fitness, fine, but that’s not an evolutionarily stable situation. You’ll end up in the dustbin of genetic history, replaced by more ethnocentric others. These are reasonably obvious arguments.  I would also point out that sexual reproduction has evolutionary advantages via increased genetic diversity. No doubt that a sufficiently advanced technology could artificially impose independent assortment and recombination on a single-sex artificial reproduction regimen, but, again, for what purpose?  While eliminating the yeastbucket requirement would no doubt be advantageous in many ways, what would be the sexual outlet for such an all-male society?  Widespread homosexuality?  I’ll take a pass on that. There are probably some things best left unchanged in human nature and the division between two sexes for reproduction is likely to be one of those.

And what’s with this obsession with Rushton and Lynn?  Look, the broad theories of both of them are likely true, but that’s as far as it goes. R-K theory on race (that I independently came up with in the 1980s after reading an ecology textbook) is undoubtedly true on the general level of – Blacks and Browns have more offspring and invest less in them; Whites and Yellows have fewer offspring but invest more in them. And, as well, Blacks and Browns have faster life histories (earlier maturation and reproduction and earlier death) than do Whites and Yellows. If Rushton had stuck with that, instead of trying to shoehorn every racial characteristic (including penis size) into the formulation, he’d be more respected today. Likewise, Lynn is likely correct that there is a general association between national IQ and economic productivity (as measured by GDP) and general accomplishment; the problem occurs when he falls too much in love with his theory (as did Rushton with his ideas) and tries to fit every data point into the pattern, with ludicrous “estimates of IQ,” racial history fairy tales about admixture, and hand waving “just so stories” to explain anomalies. The problem, I suppose, is that the broad theories are a bit too obvious and common sense, plain to any reasonably intelligent and honest observant individual, and so there isn’t much “intellectual prestige” in merely stating the obvious.  Therefore, ego-driven “intellectuals” have to build castles of sand to demonstrate how very clever they are.

Counter-Currents commentary:

Craig
Posted July 1, 2019 at 8:07 am | Permalink
Yang was a joke who never should have had any support from the Dissident Right in the first place. Those who did have made public fools of themselves.

Craig, meet Greg Johnson. And Richard Spencer. And many more.

Also, what’s the big deal about Gabbard? Oh she’s good on foreign policy. But so is Trump. He not once, but twice, averted war by outmaneuvering the warhawks in DC. First with Syria and now with Iran. He’s the peace candidate you should be voting for.

There’s no reason to pay attention to any of these clowns with a (D) in front of their name.

Craig, meet David Duke.  And Richard Spencer.

Then there’s John Morgan:

John Morgan
Posted July 1, 2019 at 6:33 am | Permalink
Rep. Gabbard seems to be the least bad (notice I’m not saying good) of all these people. It’s also worth mentioning her connections to/support of Hindu nationalist groups in India like the BJP and RSS (since she is a practicing Hindu herself). This doesn’t necessarily equate to sympathy for nationalism for white people, but it suggests she may at least have the vision to not be completely averse to it. In practice that may not mean much, however. But as Mr. Hampton wrote, she has no chance of getting the nomination this time around, anyway.

You know she supports reparations for Negroes, right?

A one, a one, a one two three….

Ted Cruz at least spoke up about this.  Antifa Don Trump, The God Emperor?  Silence.

MAGA!  Pepe! Kek!

Readers of this blog know that I am no apologist for homosexuals (of either sex) but I’m no apologist for hypocrisy either.  I mean, really….  Apparently, “homophobia” – “vile” or otherwise – is perfectly acceptable in the service of “movement” feuds.  Perhaps, Antifa can be critiqued in other ways than their penchant for sending gay Asians to the hospital.