Category: revolutionary violence

The Strategic Objective

Nietzsche’s child rather than lion (or camel) – a constructive thesis.

Let’s first consider two points that form the foundation of the thesis of this post.

Point 1. A primary objective of terrorism and guerrilla warfare is to provoke repressive measures from the government, which will negatively affect the population, alienating and radicalizing that population, and turning them against the government.

This is generally true, and as I recall was favorably mentioned by Pierce in The Turner Diaries.

Note that while this statement derives from historical examples of political violence, it can also apply to memetic “terrorism” and “warfare” as well.  Thus, discussion of Point 1 does not in any way imply advocacy of actual physical terrorism or guerrilla warfare (which are, by the way, primarily performed by the political Left), but instead illustrates the point – the historically demonstrated fact – that provoking a government to repress its people typically generates hatred of the people toward that government, to the benefit of the adversaries of that government.

Point 2. Revolutions typically do not take place during the time of the greatest repression, but rather occur when that repression is suddenly relaxed.

This point (previously mentioned at this blog) is also generally true.  Note that the System either consciously or unconsciously recognizes this to be so, since its reaction to Trumpism and the brief rise of the Alt Right has been to viciously double down on the repression and on its anti-White narrative. They have absolutely rejected the path of concessions and reconciliation.

Obviously, Points 1 and 2 are not fully compatible with each other, which allows a prudent strategy of provocation to present to the System a dilemma manifested by a choice between two unpleasant, and ultimately destructive, alternatives.

If the System responds to Far Right provocations with increasing repression – and it is fundamentally important that the repression must be distributed among at least a sizable fraction of the White population and not just tightly targeted to the Far Right – then it will alienate and radicalize that portion of the population (Whites) on which the System’s own effective function, and its overall long-term viability, depends.  The System will lose moral authority as it props itself up by using the same terror it purports to fight.  

With the loss of moral authority comes more resistance, and while Revolution per se may not occur during this period of great repression, the loss of moral authority, and the cycle of repression, hatred, resistance, and more repression cannot go on forever. Eventually a breaking point will be reached in which the System can no longer be tenable while repressing and attacking the very population necessary for ensuring the System’s efficient maintenance; the System will either break down and collapse under the weight of what is essentially a runaway, and ultimately fatal, autoimmune reaction (i.e., attacking its own body after being exposed to an antigen), or it will be forced to attempt to salvage the situation by making concessions, leading us to Point 2. 

On the other hand, if the System wants to avoid the scenario of Point 1, sensing that if it pushes Whites too far and too fast it will eventually lose everything, or if tries repression and it fails, and it starts making concessions (relaxing the repression, Point 2), then the System loses moral authority by looking weak, tacitly admitting that its Far Right adversary has legitimacy, and admitting that White interests and White opposition to the System are at least partially valid.  This will lead to a “snowball” effect as increasing concessions lead to increasing legitimacy for White demands and thus further concessions, undermining the System’s whole raison d’etre of anti-Whiteness.  

As long as the Far Right is prudent enough to keep up the pressure, keep up the demands, keep up the provocations, keep up the memetic war, keep on “heightening the contradictions,” then the loss of moral authority for the System will become irreversible and lead to the loss of political, economic, and social authority as well.  Keep in mind that Coloreds, with their sense of entitlement and hatred of Whites, will see any concessions to White interests as a betrayal by the System (which they see, all grievance rhetoric aside, as THEIR System), further weakening the System’s moral authority, and making the System have to choose between placating sets of incompatible tribal interests. The endpoint is collapse, perhaps from different mechanisms as the collapse of Point 1, but collapse nevertheless.

The System would try to solve this dilemma by doing what it is doing now – attempting to specifically target repression to a relatively small subset of Whites, including the Far Right itself, while slowing down White dispossession enough so as to “boil the frog slowly.”  More recently, with the hysterical reaction to Trumpism, this strategy is starting to fray, and repression is more and more leaking out to the general White population.  In a very real sense, that general repression has always been with us – forced integration, affirmative action, racial double standards, mass immigration, political correctness, social pricing, hate crimes laws, hate speech laws in Europe, etc. – but it is becoming more obvious now.  This demonstrates the validity of this post’s general thesis – if something as mild as Trumpism, and as inept as the Alt Right, could provoke the System as much as it has, and “dropped the mask” to the general White population, what would a serious and strategic strategy of (memetic) Far Right provocation achieve?  Thus, any movement would need to create conditions so that backlash against it would affect Whites outside of that movement, so as to put “in play” the various processes outlined in this post. For example, serious and authentic community activism and political engagement would create ties between the Far Right and the broader White population, so that repression targeted at the former would be necessity negatively affect the latter.  Of course, we need intelligent, disciplined, and rational Type II activists to plan these strategies; Type I activists have demonstrated, time and again, their inability to effectively manage (or even attempt) these approaches.

Before we conclude with an outline of things to do, let us briefly consider: how could an alternative System – for example, a racial nationalist System – avoid being placed in the sort of dilemma outlined here?  Simple: by representing the interests of the people, by supporting majority rights rather than that of minorities, by making Whites into authentic stakeholders in the System and its well-being.  Whites have long since stopped being authentic stakeholders in the current System, in any real sense, long ago.

What to do? The following have been discussed at this blog in detail previously, but briefly we can summarize:

1. Build a legionary cadre.  No defectives, no Alt Right lulzers, no obsessives and fetishists, no zombies mindlessly parroting “movement” dogma, but hardcore, “vanguardist” political soldiers, truly vetted (extremely!) and put through years of long apprenticeship, a genuine movement akin to that of Codreanu, a pan-European Brotherhood that will form the core of the undermining of the old System and the creation of a new one.  And guess what?  This is not talked about in “interviews” with the media, it is not recruited online in sniggering “forums,” it is instead done privately and prudently, slowly, carefully, and with forethought.  Obviously, the existence of such an organization would not be a secret, just as the existence of the CIA, MI6, KGB, and GRU were not secrets, but the inner workings of the group, by analogy to those others, would of course be hidden from the public.  

2. Community activism.  Real community activism is done, not talked about.  It is done as much as possible “under the radar.”  You do not broadcast it to mocking media operatives, you don’t go through the motions for the sake of a quick blog post, this is not something done overnight.  True community activism is for the long-term, it is a work of years, it is done to help the community, not with an attitude of expecting an immediate compensation – the idea of compensation should not come into it at all. Of course, community activism by its nature cannot be kept secret; the point is that such activism is its own publicity – in other words, it becomes known because it occurs and it is effective, it is its own advertisement, it doesn’t become known because activists spend more time talking to the media than they do actually helping people.

3. Metapolitics and infrastructure. Metapolitics has been discussed endlessly by the Far Right, and so there is no need to repeat all of that here. Such activity is essential, as long as it is fresh, creative, and open-minded, and not merely the regurgitation of fossilized “movement” dogma.  We need real infrastructure to carry out our objectives, approaches to defeat social pricing, funding that goes beyond tin cup panhandling but actual involves earning money through some sort of productivity, service, and/or representation, we need lawyers (and not to drive them out of the “movement”), we need businessmen, doctors, academics, plumbers, mechanics, schoolteachers, politicians, we need a recreated and actualized society. By the way, metapolitics should include Salter’s democratic multiculturalism, which overlaps with both community activism and electoral politics.

4. Electoral politics. This has three purposes.  First, education, propaganda, and recruitment.  Second, provocation, heightening the contradictions, undermining the System, promoting chaos and balkanization.  Third, if elected, these people can not only leverage their office for the preceding two purposes, but also to protect the movement as much as possible,

5. Rallies, etc. – false-flag and genuine. False-flag rallies are meant as a distraction, to focus attention of adversaries to the open and superficial “cosplay actors on the street” as opposed to the more serious work going on elsewhere.  It would still need to be credible, to be viewed as a genuine threat and so worthy of attention, and also so as not to repulse Whites interested in joining the cause.  Later on, with the success of the other objectives 1-4 above, rallies and mass meetings, of a highly professional nature (even more so that the false-flag ones), can occur for all the positives such events can genuinely provide to a real and growing firmly established movement.

Advertisements

Der News, News, News, 3/5/18

It’s Der Movement!

First: an unannounced odyssey.  Every couple of months I search Amazon to see if Bolton’s Yockey book had been published (as well as checking Far-Right sites for an announcement).

Lo and behold!

I’ll read that Kindle when I finish the sets of books I’m tackling now (Late Western Roman Empire, and also a new Hitler biography is gathering dust here and I need to get to that at some point). But for now I ask: why hasn’t this book publication been announced and promoted at various Far-Right sites?  This is an important development and we have to search it out as if it was being hidden.

Sometimes Der Movement baffles me, it really does.

So let EGI Notes make the announcement:

BOLTON’S YOCKEY BIOGRAPHY HAS FINALLY BEEN PUBLISHED

Nicholas Farrell, who is not an ethnic Italian but lives in Italy, sighs loudly once again about those stupid and unruly Afrowops:

The Fascist dictator Benito Mussolini, comparing himself to Michelangelo and Italians to marble—the raw material the Renaissance genius used to fashion his sculptures—once complained to German journalist Emil Ludwig: “It’s the raw material that I lack. Governing the Italians is not impossible. It is useless.”
Since the fall of Il Duce in 1945, Italy has had 65 governments, and today the Italians return to the polls to choose the 66th. Incredibly, for non-Italians at least…

Yeah Farrell, it’s all like real terrible and all.  How about leaving Italy then?

A new “movement” disease called the Farrell-Munro-Deasy Syndrome: live in, or at least visit, someone else’s nation (as an ethnic alien), complain about and insult the natives, with marrying a native woman optional (while mocking the men…an omnidominant ploy? Perhaps those “farther from human origins” are more “omnidominant?”).

So far I have no reason to include that Leonard (AltRight.com) fellow in this syndrome; while he lives In Italy he so far has not attacked the natives.

Read this.

This is a vehemently pacifist blog, advocating complete non-violence in the grand Gandhian tradition, a beacon of human love and compassion, unalterably opposed to the use of any force whatsoever.  Turn the other cheek!  However, on a purely theoretical basis, purely hypothetically, what if, the next time some “extreme right leader” is “violently attacked by protestors” that some identified extreme left activist thug simply disappears?  Vanished, never to be seen again. What happened to them?  A mystery it all is!  Such a course of action is of course despicable and denounced by this blog in the strongest possible terms, it must never happen, we denounce it utterly, but, hypothetically speaking, purely theoretically, it may make the thugs think twice the next time they decide to do their usual ten-on-one “sucker punch” style attacks on rightists.  But self-defense for rightists contravenes the hardcore humanist views of this blog so it must of course never ever occur. Never, never, never!  Rightists must of course be attacked with complete impunity, with the Left fearing no payback whatsoever.

After all, why should a “movement” ostensibly based upon concepts of national greatness, masculinity, virility, force, and Faustian overcoming ever defend itself?  Do nothing, meekly allow yourselves to be assaulted, and then cry for the authorities (who hate you) to step in – that’s the ticket!

By the way, that happened while a “hardcore conservative” is President of Sicily.

Sound familiar? Just like how Trump and Sessions look the other way when Antifa run wild in the streets of America, even though Der Touchback and Der Howdy have the power to declare that group a terrorist organization and fully unleash federal law enforcement on them.

In any case, isn’t it clear that “extreme right” leaders need bodyguards when venturing out in public?  It’s even obvious to an ultra-pacifist and lover of humanity as me that the “extreme right” needs to form paramilitary groups to defend their politicians, speakers, and leaders, within the scope of existing law. 

Read here. That is why we need POPA.

Two Maxims

Some things I’ve discussed before, but which are worth emphasizing.

The first came to my attention from the work of the defector “Viktor Suvorov.”

Maxim One: Revolutions typically do not occur during the period of greatest repression; instead, they take place after that repression is suddenly relaxed.

Examples: The French Revolution, the Bolshevik Revolution, Glasnost leading to the Fall of Communism in Eastern Europe.

The System/Left knows this, if only instinctively.  Hence, they are doubling down on all their anti-White, SJW narratives and repression after Trump’s victory.  They refuse to concede an inch, refuse to take White concerns seriously; they understand that if they start compromising, they are (eventually) finished.  And they correct to believe that; however, we must create a situation in which they simply will not have a choice but to attempt compromise; the alternative for them being, in the long-term, even more untenable.  That’s why I advocate in favor of Salter’s strategy of Democratic Multiculturalism, a form of sociopolitical ju-jitsu that forces the System to either compromise with the White Right (eventually dooming them) or openly admitting that their entire worldview is morally illegitimate (eventually dooming them as well, particularly as that would increase White demands for the Democratic Multiculturalism option, bringing the System back to square one).  But the nitwit Type I activists of the “movement” reject that strategy in favor of their Turner Diaries fantasies and other stupidities.

Maxim Two: For any dissident force – guerrilla armies in the field, underground dissidents, racial nationalists and other fringe political movements – maintaining your existence in the face of System oppression, surviving, continuing Fabian tactics and strategies, still being there, that is itself a victory.  As long as you exist, the System has not won; as long as you exist, you prove that you could win, you place doubt in the minds of your opponents and of the masses, and if you can outlast your foe, eventual victory may very well be yours.

Thus, the importance of prioritizing survival, for not directly engaging with a superior foe, for using ju-jitsu and Fabian strategies; hence, the value of continued existence in the face of a seemingly overpowering adversary.

This applies to the “movement” as a whole, as well as dissident groupuscules within the “movement” such as EGI Notes.

Overcoming the Plutocratic Insurgency

Far-Right economic revolution.

What he says about academia, tenure, and academic freedom is right on target, despite what anti-intellectual low-brow (and failed academics who pretend to be high-brow) Type I “activists” believe.  For example, how long would KMacD have lasted at CSULB if he didn’t have genuine tenure (genuine tenure being an increasingly rare characteristic)?

To the broader point, extreme pushback against the globalist plutocratic elites is coming, and the Far-Right needs to be on the correct side in this struggle – the side of the economic “left.”  I put “left” in scare quotes because the “socialism” in “national socialism” does not equate to Marxism, but refers to the subordination of economics to political and racial objectives, instead of the other way around, which is what the Rule of Money have brought us today.

Laissez-faire capitalism has to go, plutocracy and oligarchy have to go, the idea that the “Right” broadly defined has to side with “big business” has to go as well.  And all the Alt Wrongers, with their ”sweet business deals” and their vision of a Jewish/Asian-dominated globalist society that differs from our current situation only in that it lacks Negroes and Hispanics has to go as well.

The Revolution has to be comprehensive: economic as well as racial, cultural, social, etc. We need to take the lead, and not let the anti-White Left take leadership of the anti-plutocratic resistance by default.

We need to acknowledge realities (including AI/automation, which is coming) and make sure the People benefit, not the Plutocracy, we need to support the “citizen’s dividend” idea, social credit, a distributive economy, but one based on racial principles, for our own people.

And as for all the libertarians, the HBD Alt Wrongers, the suit-and-tie conservatives who think that ghetto gang bangers are the only problem – they themselves are part of the Problem, not part of the Solution.

Economic Justice has to be part of the program to save Race and Civilization. Of Red, White, and Black, the Red component cannot be forgotten.

Charlottesville Ragnarok


Solidarity with Unite the Right, with caveats.

While I have often expressed my disagreement with the Alt Right, and my wish that the Alt Right goes into the dustbin of “movement” history, and while I would have done things differently, I still stand in solidarity with people who share most of my basic beliefs and who showed the intestinal fortitude to put themselves on the line in this rally.  Also, there is some “professional courtesy” involved for Spencer, etc.  I was involved in racial activism while Spencer was finishing high school, I have many years invested in this, and, like it or not, Spencer is one of, if not the, leading figure on the American Far Right today.  I’m not going to throw Spencer under the bus (unlike some of his Alt Wrong buddies), but a critical analysis needs to be made of all of this. This is just an initial “day after” view; as more information comes in, and the dust settles a bit, I’ll likely have more to say.  I’ll also very interested to read what Spencer’s Far Right critics have to say about this issue, as well.

In the short term, this is a mess and will have negative consequences (note that there are never negative consequences for anything the Left does, but the fact that the System is stacked against the Right is part of our “awakening,” is it not?  You play the cards you are dealt).  In the long term, who knows?  If the Right is cowed and stops holding rallies – either because they want to “lay low” or if they cannot get a permit – then it’s a longer term defeat. If more rallies will be held, and Kessler has indicated he wants to have more, then if the same chaos occurs – chaos without objective as opposed to the targeted chaos I support – then that’s a defeat as well.

That’s another reason the falling out between Johnson and Spencer is so bad: Johnson could have been a voice of reason within the Alt Right, advising prudence against the Beavis-and-Butthead antics of the Alt Right rank and file and their still-too-immature leadership.

One would hope that before this rally, all the major stakeholders got together, planned everything carefully, and foresaw various contingencies.  One would hope that they all agreed on what the overall strategic objective was, and how to proceed afterwards, dependent upon the possibilities of what could happen.  One would hope.  One wonders if it was more likely that there were Pepe jokes, screams of “Hail Kek!” – and burnishing of shields and adjustment of capes and costumes.

I do not know whether Spencer, or anyone close to him, reads this blog.  I hope so; in any case, the following message sums up what he needs to know:

Richard, in my opinion – and, possibly, yours as well – your long term future in the “movement” lies in the area of politics, including and especially electoral politics, at a time, in the not-too-distant future, when the racial situation makes a growing fraction of White Americans more amenable to “this thing of ours.”  However, you are fast approaching the point where your continued association with the juvenile jackass faction of the Alt Right is going to compromise your future political viability, even if the racial situation sours and Whites become more “open” to “radicalism.”  Hailgate was nothing, a tempest in a teapot; Charlottegate is another thing entirely; three people are dead.  No, it’s not your fault, but you know as well as I do that in politics, perception, if not everything, is often more important than the actual truth.  There will come a point where continued incidents are going to close off potential future options for you.   

I urge you, I implore you, to seek out and consider guidance and input from older and more experienced activists.  If I am unacceptable due to ethnicity, pseudonymity, temperament, hostility to the Alt Right, or some other reason; if Johnson is unacceptable because of your feud, then find someone else.  Dickson can give legal advice, but you need more broad guidance.  Duke and Strom are too radical, a more prudent touch is required. Brimelow – who wistfully discusses with Jewish correspondents the possibility of you being shot – is too moderate, not in any way any sort of racial nationalist.  As much as I oppose the whole Alt Wrong, I’ll say then your best bet is Taylor, if you overlook his reaction to Hailgate.  You’re both in the general DC area; I’d suggest you get some serious input ASAP. That doesn’t mean you should accept the Amren ideology; I’m talking about grown-up strategic and tactical advice. I’d also suggest you heal the rift with Johnson, which is unproductive for all involved (and for all, I mean the entire “movement” – since your Alt Right brand’s pretense of “movement” hegemony has essentially equated the Alt Right with White nationalism in the public mind).  I would also move as quickly as possible on the attorney network and get serious input from folks on your (I guess “our”) side who have military/security/law enforcement experience. You are in a spot now that if you don’t hold more rallies, then that’s a sign of weakness and damaging to your progress, but more fiascos like yesterday will seriously affect your overall viability in the long term. And we do not yet know all the fallout – legal, social, political, internal-to-the-“movement” of all of this.  It is now a critical time and I would suggest that your next moves be planned carefully and strategically.

As to more general advice for “movement” events – the rally would have been better served with a smaller and more cohesive group.  This is another example of the Right rushing into things ill prepared.  Some things should have been in order first: a professional (and uniformed, see below) security force, the proposed attorney network, a cohesive plan of action, coupling these tactics to a long term strategy. It’s not a good idea to issue a general call for “anyone sort of Alt-Righty-in-sentiment to show up and do your thing” – the quantity doesn’t offset the loss of quality.  Yes, maybe the car was being swarmed and maybe it was self-defense: but you know, only one person drove their car into the crowd and created that whole PR mess; a more cohesive and disciplined group, with a plan, may well have avoided all of that.

I differ from the current mindset that says “we should not wear uniforms – dressing in scruffy street clothes, or like a Marvel superhero, or like some other kind of brain addled jackass is much better.”  No, uniforms are a net positive.  Uniforms serve a number of purposes.  First and most obviously, to distinguish friend from foe. But, then, also, and relevant here, uniforms provide a sense of solidarity, professionalism, group pride, discipline – in a phrase: esprit de corps.  To the charge that uniforms are “un-American,” “creepy,” or what have you – first, the military wear uniforms and if you style yourself a “political soldier” then it is not creepy, second, there were the Silver Shirts and other American groups that wore uniforms, third, dressing up like Captain America looks even worse to “normies” than a tasteful and professional uniform, and, fourth, you’ll be called a “Nazi White supremacist” whatever you wear, so you may as well go in style, and with professional discipline.  

Trump and Sessions cucked as expected.  If they had cracked down on Antifa months ago, like they should have, the violence they deplore would not have happened.  It’s partially on their heads, on their incompetence and cowardice.  Some of the Trump fanboys are breathing heavily that “his statement was vague and condemned all sides.”  Maybe so. Let’s see how things play out in the days to come.  As to the excuse, “what else can he do as President,” well, see above.  The ultimate reason I say that Trump and Sessions “cucked out” is their previous failure to denounce, and act against, extreme leftist violence, including violence against their own supporters.  It is their previous abject failure, their abdication of their federal law enforcement responsibility, which, combined with their “let’s all be united and reject hatred” rhetoric, that casts them in a small and cowardly light.  If they are stampeded by System pressure to make even more targeted anti-White comments, then that would just reinforce what the reality is about them. And Trump’s comments that “the economy is real good now, so what are all these protests about?” are so inane that it is difficult to believe this man has any sense whatsoever.  Is he really that delusional?

Hey, Ivanka, there’s no place in America for small-headed, ferret-faced, shiksa sluts and their anorexic Jew husbands and their mixed-race children. Israel has a “law of return” and the entire Kushner clan, yourself included, will be most welcome there.  

How long before Trump cucks even more?  What is going on here?  And to the Virginia Establishment: no, you liars, the only side who initiated the violence were the anti-White leftists.  If they didn’t attack the rally, none of this would have happened.  To blame “racists” and “White supremacists” (a term that should disqualify anyone who uses it to describe White nationalists) means that you are blaming the victim and assert that Whites do not have the right to publicly convene to defend their interests.  You’re despicable.

And when is the Right going to get over its fetish for the police and all the “heroes in blue?” When is it going to stop fantasizing (a small scale version of the Man on White Horse Syndrome) that “the police (or military or FBI) is really on our side” then to see the police attack lawful Rightist rally-goers, while ignoring, or siding with, Left terrorists?  If you are revolutionaries, then the forces of the System are against you; they are the enemy.  Of course, you should try and recruit as many of them as you can, but as a group beholden to the System they are against us, not for us.

Indeed, the System – the ENTIRE System – is against us, never forget this. Look at all the nice GOP conservatives denouncing “White supremacists” and eschewing “blood and soil” and completely ignoring the fact that the violence was started, as usual, by the Far Left.

Yes sir, the FBI can probe “White nationalist violence” but for some reason endless months of Antifa violence causes no investigation.  More proof that all these “anarchist” “rebels” are part and parcel of the System, tools of globalism and Big Business, running dogs of the Establishment, working hand-in-glove with politicians and law enforcement.

And we have certain past Presidents citing communist terrorist Mandela against all these nasty “racists.” Yes, indeed, cite and praise a terrorist, side with Antifa terrorism, and oppose people legally exercising their constitutional rights of free assembly.  Who?  Who? Indeed.

Here are excerpts (emphasis added) from an excellent VDARE article on the System reaction to this fiasco:

The mask is off.

There can be no further delusions nor any more comforting lies. “America” and the supposed “freedoms” guaranteed by its Constitution are as relevant today as the Holy Roman Empire’s claims to sovereignty or the head of the House of Stuart boasting about being King of England.

In Charlottesville, Virginia, the police department openly attacked a demonstration in defense of European-American heritage. They did these despite the Unite The Right rally having secured a permit (after legal action) and having every right to host its peaceful demonstration in defense of the Robert E. Lee statue.

“Antifa,” the openly communist, anti-white and violent thugs who exist solely to attack European-Americans, were out in force in the city, using the cowardly tactics they specialize in: spraying demonstrators with mace, throwing bottles and bricks, and attacking people with weapons (including a homemade flamethrower).

It is quite true, as VDARE.com reported, that the police did not protect demonstrators from Antifa and did little to prevent confrontations. Attendees of the demonstration, rather than walking a clear path to the park, were instead forced to walk through a line of screaming protesters. Liberal clergyman and elderly women held signs about “peace” and “love” and smiled benevolently—as violent Leftist protesters attacked from the crowd. They are as culpable as the Antifa themselves for the violence unleashed.

But that was not close to the worst. Demonstrators did not need protection from Antifa. All the police would have had to do to ensure a safe demonstration was simply go home—which is what happened in Berkeley. Patriots equipped with shields, inured to Antifa tactics of throwing bricks and spraying mace, had secured Lee Park (excuse me, “Emancipation Park”) and may indeed have outnumbered both Antifa and counter-demonstrators in terms of pure numbers. Several were armed, and the city fathers should be offering Unite The Right activists tearful tributes for the latter’s saint-like restraint in not opening fire despite more than justified provocation.

If police had done nothing, the public would have been safer. Instead, unforgivably, the police attacked (not dispersed—attacked) the legal demonstration, threatening attendees with arrest if they stayed in Lee Park.

Then activists, totally unprotected by police, were deliberately funneled into a gauntlet of attacking Communists, in a kind of Kill Zone. Injuries on both sides were predictable. (Of course, much like cuckservatives who bow and scrape to the Main Stream Media, the police were then insulted by the Communists for their trouble.

This could have been a relatively stable situation: a patriot demonstration protected by its own shield wall (and ideally, by police who actually did their job) along with a separate group of Leftist protesters, with both groups enjoying the right to free speech supposedly guaranteed them by the Constitution.

Instead, the police precipitated a running battle which engulfed all of Charlottesville. The result: Antifa running wild and chasing down isolated pockets of Unite The Right attendees as the latter defended themselves as best they could, with bystanders were caught in the melee. Police showed no interest in doing anything other than threatening patriots with arrests for “unlawful assembly.”

In contrast, of course, Leftists were free to disobey the laws and marched merrily down the streets, many chanting “Black Lives Matter!”, causing chaos as they went. As Rebel Media’s Faith Goldy reported, this was an absurd “double standard.” Anarcho-Tyranny was the order of the day in C-Ville.

The casualties are piling up as I write this on Saturday evening [Charlottesville Rally Turns Deadly; One Killed After Car Strikes Crowd, by Phil McCausland, Emmanuelle Saliba, and Moira Donohue, NBC News, August 12, 2017]. A car plowed into a crowd of Leftist protesters, though it is unknown whether this was deliberate or politically motivated.  But note that the only reason this was even possible is that law enforcement thought it was a good idea to turn over the streets to anarchists.

Adding to the chaos, there is also a report of a National Guard helicopter crashing nearby and two fatalities have been reported [Helicopter crash in Albemarle County, CBS 19, August 12, 2017].

All of this occurred after a “state of emergency” had been declared and demonstrations were supposed to have been halted.

It’s obvious to anyone on the ground, or anyone who has been paying attention to any of this over the last few years, that Antifa are responsible for the entirety of the violence. Leftists, no matter how extreme, do not have to fear Right Wing violence at their events, nor do they have to fear the police ignoring attacks against them.

Violence did not just “break out” at Unite The Right. Attendees were attacked—by Leftists and by the police. They worked together as seamlessly as if they had common leadership.

Despite this, or perhaps because of it, the System’s most shameless courtiers, Main Stream Media journalists, are trying to blame Unite The Right participants.

As Antifa openly slash tires, attack activists (and random bystanders) and parade under symbols of Communist mass murder, it is not as though journalists do not see what is happening. No one can pretend it is pro-white demonstrators who are being violent or destroying property, not even reporters. However, like the city government, the journalists are determined to disguise this reality.

But what’s most disappointing, though not surprising, is how Establishment Conservatives are going along with this—including Donald Trump.

Something Good About the Alt Right vs. Alt Nuts

Boots on the ground vs. self-absorbed egoism.

First, the good news.


Kinetic beauty.

The Alt Right can get “boots on the ground” and they stand up to leftist thugs (Alt Right god in action).  They should be praised for that.  If they can attract youth with their juvenile jackassery, fine too, But the problem occurs when they have delusions of grandeur – if they would just stick to being the youth wing of racial nationalism (while toning down the jackassery to a level just enough to attract youth and no more), fine.  But they are not “the movement” regardless of their fantasies (see Alt Nuts below).

Further, while Identity Europa may identify (no pun intended) as ‘Alt Right” there is a difference between a more serious group like them and the online lulzing jackasses (and Presidential jackasses).


Also, how much of the limited Alt Right success has been due to their own efforts, and how much has been circumstance (Trump, etc.)?


Another good thing is the stated intention of the Alt Right to ditch the Alt Lite. Can they do the same for the Alt Wrong?


The Alt Wrong is once again promoting the ultra-Aryan Haalstat Nord Hart – who after all, has consistently demonstrated being a non-bitter and loyal supporter of Amren and, indeed, the “movement” without the slightest disruption or controversy.  Those HuWhite Men of the West are always the most conciliatory, discreet, and well-spoken of convention guests!


Now for the latest Alt Nuts episode.


For and by young White men.

Yes, nothing wrong with that, but:


DO NOT PRETEND TO SPEAK FOR THE ENTIRE RACIAL NATIONALIST “MOVEMENT,” THANK YOU VERY MUCH!


Stick with your juvenile millennial jackassery and stop the pretensions of memetic hegemony.  We older White men have our own agenda, which, believe it or not, doesn’t include obsessing over a cartoon frog or screaming about “Kek.”

For every step forward, the Alt Right takes two steps back, mostly due to their navel-gazing obtuseness and lack of measure.  Get over yourselves please…and quickly.

This Is Outrageous

A question for the Alt Right.

While Spencer was at Auburn, fighting the good fight, “happy penguin” Pete was emailing; this is an excerpt of an email Brimelow proudly tells us he sent a Jew (emphasis added):

If you read what I sent you at the time, you must realize how angry I was with Richard Spencer…—
But the fact is that he’s introduced more people to the idea of immigration restriction than all the rest of us put together. And he’s just forced Auburn to let him speak there, something that Milo, and Murray, and Mac Donald (and for that matter me) all failed to do.
If it’s any consolation to you, I think it’s just a matter of time until he gets shot.

I wonder what Spencer thinks about that.  Not only has he been “thrown under the bus” by the Alt Wrong, but now the Alt Wrongers are trying to cheer up their Jewish correspondents by giving them the “consolation” that Spencer is likely to get shot.

This is all a bit too much, isn’t it?

My question to the Alt Right is: When are you guys finally going to forcefully denounce the Alt Wrong?  Are you going to wait until they reach the point of actually celebrating if you do actually get shot?

Well, I’ll do some denouncing for them.  Brimelow is a money-grubbing, Jew-loving, low-life, who uses pictures of his own children as a money-making ploy during his frequent “hand-out” campaigns, and who, at the same time, gives a forum to a race-mixing idiot who publicly came out to defend the concept that possession of child porn should be legal (and that argued at VDARE itself).

Why anyone on the (Far) Right continues to associate with these “people” is beyond me.