Greg Johnson describes how he attacks those on the Right:
principled intellectual disagreement vs. personal invective (It is not “divisive” to sincerely disagree with someone.)defending oneself from attacks vs. launching attacks on otherscalling out people for harming the movement vs. pointless personal vendettas
The problem is that this is exactly what Ted Sallis does, but when Ted does it, he’s “crazy and bitter” and to be “banned.”
Zaremski was an emergency medical technician who frequented white supremacist forums online and had a trove of neo-Nazi literature. He was caught only because he sent a photo of his ex-girlfriend wearing parts of a Nazi uniform to her employer, officials said…He also affixed a “Right Wing Death Squad” patch to his EMT jacket.
Der Movement, Der Movement, Der Movement marches on.
Look at this naïve buffoon presenting ancestry testing results to the decimal point for Gabbard, including percentages of 3.8, 1.1, and 0.8. Depending on the test and the parental populations used, I would question even the percentages in the 20s.
Let it not be said that the “movement’s” affirmative action “leadership” does not come up with brilliant ideas – this is one! Heil Der Movement! Heil!
No, actually the Alt Right should just continue on the glorious path already established.
Andrew Fraser wanna-be and “Wilmot” lover Morris the Liar is back again with the same old shtick. Question – wasn’t it the grand old WASP foreign policy establishment that gave us American involvement in WWI and WWII (and don’t start braying about “Pearl Harbor” with respect to the latter, with all the grand work Der Movement has done over the years uncovering the FDR administration’s perfidy regarding that)?
Oh you’ll say – the Jews were manipulating there. If that is the case, as far back as WWI, then when did the USA have an authentically Humphrey Irelandish foreign policy apparatus? The Spanish American War perhaps, brought to us by grand fellows like Hearst (journalism leading foreign policy) and the reason we have so many Puerto Ricans and Filipinos in American today. What? Do we gave to go back to Polk and the Mexican American War? Or perhaps Jefferson and the Louisiana Purchase? Or Washington’s Farewell Address?
Der Movement likes to pontificate, but cannot back up all of the hot air with historical reality.
If you believe that in the past that American foreign policy was run by the “Majority,” then this is relevant. Fiction mirroring reality. After all, if Der Movement loves the Pesci scene so much, they can also consider the content of the remainder of the movie as well.
Now, I did state:
A case can be made that folks like the Wilsons founded and built America and so they have the right to pull the strings…
Very well. But if so, at least have the honesty to admit when the Wilsons screw things up, instead of pretending those were halcyon days – the Golden Age of foreign affairs from which we’ve sadly fallen to the Yogi Bear (“Kali Yuga”). But then, the concept of accountability is not very well accepted by Der Movement and its “leadership,” is it?
My response to this nonsense is this EGI Notes post. Fact is, Rushton was exposed as a fraud and a personal hypocrite by a fellow HBDer. That Johnson blithely ignores the facts about his hero and continues to peddle him as some sort of admirable figure is unfortunate but not (to me) surprising.