Category: Rising Tide of Color

Fortress North or Asian Imperialism?

It’s the latter.

Derbyshire obviously has a strong personal interest in obfuscating the Asian threat to Whites, in promoting pro-Asian attitudes among Whites, and to make Whites accept Asians living amongst them.  In addition, HBD is a radical political movement dedicated to enslaving Whites to Jews and Asians, and not let us not forget that Derbyshire is a prominent HBDer; thus, personal and ideological motivations are intertwined.

I’ve long attacked the “Arctic Alliance” nonsense, and I will do so again.  You do not make alliances with deadly enemies who are bent on your destruction.  The existential meaning of Asians is hatred of Whites – is that the foundation of a White-Asian alliance?  Asians are part of the Rising Tide of Color invading White lands (“immigration”) and engaging in anti-White pan-colored activism once infested in White living spaces.

If Asians were really “allies” of Whites, then they would agree with the premise that Asians no more belong in, say, San Francisco, New York, Vancouver, etc. than the British belonged in Hong Kong.  If Asians were “allies” then they would support the repatriation of Asian-“Americans” and Asian-“Canadians” and Asian-“Australians” and “British Asians” etc. back to their homelands.  They would oppose Asian immigration to the West.  But they do not do these things because the “Arctic Alliance” – just like HBD and “Silk Road White nationalism” – is nothing more than sugarcoated ruthless Asian imperialism.

Yes, Derbyshire says he doesn’t want an “Arctic Union” (except in his own household, which forces Asians into White living space), but note how he slyly equates a Euro-Asian union with an all Euro union.  And this quibbling aside, my main point remains – the Asian “Arctics” (that of course include “Rosie”) are part of the anti-White colored alliance.  Derbyshire can pontificate an opposition to the free flow of people across “Arctic” nations (while hypocritically facilitating it in his private life) but mass Asian immigration to the West is a fact.  The Asian Invasion is ongoing and there can be no talk of an “alliance” until that ruthless invasion is stopped and then reversed through the repatriation of all persons of full or part Asian ethnic origins back to their homelands.

Ethnonationalism is Atomized Individualism at the Racial-Civilizational Level

Some thoughts.

Listening to this podcast (transcript here) I find that I agree with 95% of what Greg Johnson said.  As per the other 5%, some points are as follows.

There’s a widespread misconception that White Nationalism means just the idea that if you’re white, you belong in the same state. And I think that that’s a ridiculous idea, a parody actually, of what most White Nationalists believe.

That’s a parody of the pan-European perspective, but very few people actually promote this view.  It’s as much as a strawman argument as saying that ethnonationalists all want to restart WWII.

The great conflicts of the twentieth century were largely between different white nations. And, largely, those conflicts came about because these groups were not respecting the autonomy of other white groups

And who wasn’t respecting that autonomy?  Extreme ethnonationalists, each looking out for their perception of what was best for their nation, at the expense of the race as a whole. That explanation is nothing new, Stoddard in The Rising Tide of Color said as much about WWI, as he was correct about that.

There’s also of course the Chinese question and South Asia, Africa, and so forth. These are distinct groups of people, distinct geopolitical blocs, and it would be nice if we can have white nations coordinating their plans regarding them in order to survive, rather than what we have today, which is our leadership basically conspiring to replace our population with non-whites from around the world.

There are some positive points in that paragraph.  Yes, the Chinese and South Asians should indeed be grouped with Africans as distinct geopolitical blocs that pose a question for Whites – a question of our very survival.  And, yes, coordination among Whites is good, but “coordination” per se does not go far enough when faced with this Clash of Civilizations.

How to balance coordination with sovereignty?  If a sovereign Ireland decides they want to import one million Negroes for cheap labor, would they have that right?  If England wanted to make an alliance with China against Germany, should we respect English sovereignty?  If so, racial coordination is impossible and White nationalism is a joke.  If not, then there are clear limits to sovereignty, and coordination leads to a certain amount of integration – an integration that still respects national boundaries and ethnocultural preservation.

…is that they’re trying to swindle the native European peoples of all the European lands and also European colonial peoples like Americans, Canadians, and others of having a future, of having homelands where they can be confident that they will control the government, control their destiny, and have a country that they feel is like home…

Yes, and the Silk Road Asian imperialists are chief among these swindlers.

Our individualism, our kind of “devil take the hindmost” attitude, and our unwillingness to confront the fact that this game is rigged against us—and that the long-term trends are quite dire, and that we simply will cease to exist as distinct nations and as a biological race in a couple hundred years if we don’t stop this—so we’re individualistic, we’re guilty, we try and make our own peace with the system, we’re afraid of joining together and actually trying to change it….

Isn’t ethnonationalism analogous to the type of atomized individualism that is decried by WNs?  In other words, as atomized individualism is to ethnic and racial nationalism, so is (narrow) ethnonationalism to pan-Europeanism. Ethnonationalism is atomized individualism at the racial-civilizational level.  At the national level, we observe selfish atomized individuals who ignore the collective good of the national ethny; at the racial-civilizational level we observe selfish atomized national ethnies and ethnonationalists who ignore the collective good of the overall Race-Culture.

One point brought up in the podcast is that Whites tend to project their own mentality to other peoples.  

And underlying that, though, is the same grandiose notion that really we’re the only people who matter, for good or evil, in the world, and other people are somewhat negligible as agents, and that assumption is very deep and a sort of bedrock assumption in a lot of Leftists.

And really, I stopped the projection and decided I need to try and understand the world as these people see it, and I came at a certain point to realize that a lot of peoples, in fact the majority of peoples on Earth, do not have a sort of transparent and trusting relationship to other groups. In fact, they have suspicious, hostile, and manipulative relationships to other groups, and that what’s going on in white countries is we’re inviting in people on the assumption that they’re going to be just like us; that we’re going to be generous to them and open to them, and they’re going to be open and generous to us.

Quite right, but WNs don’t realize that they do the same thing.  Many WNs believe in “universal nationalism” applicable to all peoples, and they assume that nationalists of other races believe the same, and would allow Europeans to exist in their own homogeneous ethnostates.

This is not the case.  Jewish nationalists are often Jewish supremacists. Asian nationalists are often Asian imperialists, who believe they have a God-given right to colonize White lands. There are also people involved in the “movement” who grovel to Jewish supremacism and Asian imperialism; if “White racialists” are willing to do so, imagine how supine “normies” would be to aggressive Jews/Asians.  These non-European peoples will always be a threat to our race, for as long as we and they both exist, and we’ll need an integrated defense against them for our survival, in addition to the known threats from the general “Global South.”  This goes beyond mere “coordination.”

And in fact their attitude is that we are incredibly weak and naive, and they will dissimulate belief in our ideas when they want something from us, but when we want something from them, they’ll say, “Oh yes, yes,” but what they’ll end up doing is practice very ruthless ethnic nepotism.

That describes Asians in a nutshell – both the Silk Roaders and well as “cognitive elitists” who preach atomized individualism for Whites while practicing “very ruthless ethnic nepotism” for themselves.

The Wild Bunch

Recommended viewing.

I recently watched Sam Peckinpah’s beautifully violent 1969 Western classic, The Wild Bunch, starring William Holden, Robert Ryan, and everyone’s favorite typically Celto-Germanic Nordic Northern Italian Ernest Borgnine.

From a racial and cultural perspective, there are some interesting features to this film: Mexican mestizo incompetence and savagery, a contrast between those deficits of mestizo character and better qualities exhibited by (relatively) unmixed Amerindians (which readers of Stoddard’s The Rising Tide of Color may remember as one defining characteristic of “Red Man’s Land”)*, White competence and honor, the sexual allure of colored women even to otherwise honorable White men, and a hilariously satisfying Thermopylae-like shootout ending.

Definitely worth watching.

*Granted, the dividing line between mestizo and Amerindian was not always clear for every character (e.g., General Mapache), but, overall, the contrast, on a group level, between Mexican mestizo troops, whores, and villagers and (more unmixed) Amerindian fighters was one (subtle) theme of this film.

 


			

Der Movement in the News, 6/29/16

Several items of amusement.

White-washing the extent to which Stoddard’s racial ideas mirrored that of Grant (albeit in a weaker and more dilute fashion).
Having read Stoddard’s works, I think that Wikipedia is more accurate.

Stoddard argued that race and heredity were the guiding factors of history and civilization and that the elimination or absorption of the “white” race by “colored” races would result in the destruction of Western civilization. Like Madison Grant in his The Passing of the Great Race, Stoddard divided the white race into three main divisions: Nordic, Alpine, and Mediterranean. He considered all three to be of good stock and far above the quality of the colored races but argued that the Nordic was the greatest of the three and needed to be preserved by way of eugenics. He considered most Jews to be racially “asiatic” and argued for restricting Jewish immigration because he considered them a threat to Nordic racial purity in the US. He warned that US was being “invaded by hordes of immigrant Alpines and Mediterraneans, not to mention Asiatic elements like Levantines and Jews.

But the Counter-Currents article does tell us this factoid that I did not know about Stoddard:

Raised mainly in Italy…

Italy invaded by immigrant Stoddards? Good to see “movement” hypocrisy has a long history.
And yet with all that, if the election were held today, Trump would be crushed.
Roissyian cluelessness:

…a Chesterfield warning on the dangers of reorienting one’s foremost purpose to the objective of empowering women.

Er…isn’t that what “game” is all about? Empowering female hypergamic preferences? Men reorienting themselves to make themselves more sexually attractive to women at the cost of the men’s authenticity and dignity? Men modulating their every thought, word, and action to satisfy the flighty whims of female airheads? After all, as a CH commentator has said, men who worry about race and civilization, they get no “poosy.” And Roissy himself said he’ll “sit poolside” while civilization crumbles around him. Gotta satisfy that feminine liberalism!


And I see that on the Roissy Twitter account concern about Trump’s backpedaling.  At some point, Der Movement’s hero worship of Trump will suffer another of those endless “man on white horse” disappointments, and they will dishonestly move on as if nothing ever happened, and as if they never said that “Trump is the last hope of White America.”