Category: Romania

A Durocherian View on Romania

Makes sense from a mainstreaming view.

This is what Inspector Durocher believes is a politically-incorrect Romanian patriot:

He is pro-Jew, pro-Gypsy, anti-Hitler, and anti-Iron Guard


Just like communist informer Sir Chicken-wire is a Hungarian patriot, eh?
Advertisements

Two Wonderful Quotes

From Romania.
I’ve started reading For My Legionaries and I’d like to note two very wonderful quotes that I’ve just come across there.
First, by Codreanu himself:

This betrayal by these politicians of their people is so frightening that, if they are still alive, the people should gouge out their eyes; if they are dead, their bones should be disinterred and burnt in public squares. Their children and grandchildren should be prosecuted, their wealth confiscated and they should be stigmatized with the epithet of “traitors’ children.”

That beautiful passage, sublime in its power and elegance, should be a guiding light to how a future White ethnostate should deal with whatever traitors, HBDers, anti-White Internet trolls, “movement” wreckers, and other absolute scum fall into its hands.
Then we have Professor Ion Gavanescul talking about the Jewish influence in Romania of the past:

…inadmissible, inconceivable monstrosities of ethnic biology…

Also to the point and brimming with truthful vigor. 

Der Movement, 7/23/15

Three notes.

1. Here we see Fulford acting like a juvenile, Beavis-and-Butthead, snickering jackass once again.  Although, instead of “look at dem tatas,” he’s now moved on to “look at dat booty.” What can one expect from a website that features the lines of self-absorbed hypocrite Sailer or the mendacious piece of filth Derbyshire?

2. I’ll pass over without much comment the ongoing “Battle of the Billboards” going on in Hungary, except to say that, not surprisingly, Orban is losing, the Left is winning, and once again “mainstreaming” is exposed as a useless and cowardly fraud.

3. In response to my comment here, we get this response here. The lack of self-awareness in the “movement” is quite curious.  While I agree with the last two sentences of the comment, the rest of it is quite interesting:

People sometimes erroneously refer to Gypsies as Romanians. So this failure to distinguish Romanian people from inbred degenerate Gypsies may cause some misunderstandings. However, people who are truly ethnically Romanian demonstrate typical Slavic phenotypes. Some swarthy but many fair skinned with light hair. In our current situation sons and daughters of Europa must put down their petty regional differences and realize we all face annihilation and must work together to ensure that does not happen. We have been able to band together in the past, like at the Battle of Vienna, so we must do it again.


Putting aside that Romanians are not Slavs, and that many in the “movement” do not like Slavs or “Slavic phenotypes” either, note the attempt to support Romanians by saying that although some are “swarthy” (like many of the Legionaries whose images are preserved in photographs), some are “fair skinned with light hair” (although minor differences in skin tone are hard to fully discern from old photographs, hair color is more clearly distinguishable, and I don’t recall ever seeing even a single Legionary with light hair). 

Indeed, the comment more or less actually supports the point I made in my original post, although I was talking more about ethnic ancestry than phenotype (although the general point still holds).   Forgetting a moment about Codreanu and his Bavarian mother, one can imagine Mota and Marin in the American “movement” – “Sure, they make sense and all, but they’re Romanian and they’re…swarthy. Forget about that!  Let’s listen to what SmokyMtn SS and AryanBlood1488 have to say instead!”