Category: Sailer

Citizenism and Mainstreaming Failure

More fails.

Trump so far has illustrated the underlying flaws of Sailler’s “citizens” (warmed over civic nationalism).  While Trump proved that, under the right set of circumstances, there was a narrow electable window for citizenism to come into power, he is also proving how utterly useless citizenism is – and will be – once elected.  Citizenism is “weak sauce” – half measures, compromises, furtive implicitness, which at its best would only slow the decline and delay the inevitable day of reckoning.  However, the Left – nay, the entire Establishment – views citizenism as equivalent to neo-Nazi White supremacy, and thus they oppose and sabotage even the most modest citizenist initiatives of Trump. Thus, while citizenism has proved electorally successful – at least this one time, with a very unconventional candidate – it is inherently doomed to fail, caught as it is between two pincers.  On the one hand, it really cannot solve the Race-Culture problem, because that’s not what it meant to do; on the other hand, it triggers the whole Establishment the same as if it really could effectively deal with Race and Culture.  It’s the worst of both worlds – not radical enough to actually achieve the required outcomes, but just radical enough to trigger a vociferous opposition that prevents even the most modest outcomes from being achieved.

Meanwhile, the “label Antifa as a terrorist organization” has passed the required number of signatures to be considered by the White House.  The ball is in your court, Mr. Trump – as is the question why you have to be forced to consider it (assuming he actually does, and doesn’t blow it off) rather than just doing the right thing to begin with.

I can’t think of a more wonderful test of Trump’s “God Emperorness” than this.  At what point will the sweaty homoerotic fanboys give up on their hero? This is something he should have done after the Inauguration riots.

They never learn.  Electoral failure, inability to appease opponents, unlimited ability to disgust the base. Mainstreaming is a perfect example of what happens when adherents to a plausible hypothesis refuse to give up that hypothesis even when faced with overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

That applies to almost everything about the “movement,” by the way.

Advertisements

Unite the Facts II: Trump Cucks Out

The orange becomes more rotten with every passing day.

Trump praises Antifa and  other urine bottle-throwing thugs for standing up against “bigotry and hate.”

“I want to applaud the many protesters in Boston who are speaking out against bigotry and hate. Our country will soon come together as one!”

At what point will the Alt Right stop the “4D chess” narratives and admit that Trump’s campaign was his greatest performance yet?


More on Charlottesville.


Read this story.  Some news outlets referred to the victim as an “innocent man.”  In other words, he is not a “neo-Nazi,” but if he was, then, oh boy, he would have deserved to have been randomly stabbed while getting out of his car.  I guess this all somehow supports pathologically insane ramblings in The Atlantic about how the Alt Right is so very powerful and all.


Truth to power.  Actually, lies and repression from power.


I don’t want to beat a dead horse but people are looking at the Unite the Right aftermath in a very short-sighted manner.  They are all considering the event itself, but ignoring the larger context behind it – that the “movement” is so very ill-prepared to take advantage of today’s propitious circumstances, and that after many decades of activism by so many people, and after so many millions of dollars of donations and “membership dues” poured into “movement” coffers.  And so we now reach a point of consummate weakness and humiliation, where “innocent” men are stabbed just because they have an “undercut.”

This is in large part due to the “movement’s” Der Tag mentality – that “Armageddon” is just around the corner, so why engage in any long-term planning and organization-building? Just head out to dem dere woods with your trusty rifle and pemmican and get ready for “the revolution.”

I remember that one “movement” quota queen was ranting in the early 2000s – and here I paraphrase from memory – that “I don’t understand why any White folks, particularly racial activists, are worrying about saving for retirement, their pensions, college tuition, or having money in their bank accounts.  Don’t they know that the system is definitely going to collapse within ten years, most likely within five years?”

Yeah…that was fifteen years ago, more or less.  And the “movement” has been saying things like that for – what? – the last 50 years or so?

Maybe it is just small sample sizes or that the “movement” selects for specific types of people, but I’ve noticed that how activists actually behave is completely opposite of what one would predict based on ethnic stereotypes.

Those individuals who are supposed to be prudent, disciplined, disinterested, far-sighted, strategic, long time preference, organized, etc. are the ones who don’t see past their noses, engage in hasty actions with little to no planning, have short time preferences that eschew thinking in terms of decades, engage in hysterical hero-worship and wishful thinking, are constantly pan-handling in the most shameful fashion (some using their own small children as money-raising props), have no organizational security, never learn from mistakes, and are angrily allergic to any criticism.  On the other hand, those who one would expect to be corrupt, short time preference, high-anxiety, neurotic, undisciplined, short-sighted, gesticulating morons are the ones counseling prudence, long-term planning and infrastructure-building, strategic organization, operational security. and critical of shameless “movement” pan-handling and womanly hero-worship.

Again, this may be a sample size and/or selection bias issue, but it has been a consistent pattern over a long period of time.

Movement Roundup: 8/9/17

Odds and ends.

Crucially important Sailer comment of world historical importance:

Personally, I haven’t had a car for the last year, at least not when my wife is at work. I probably lost a little weight from all the walking to do errands. My son has the 1998 Infiniti with 250,000 plus miles, but I hope to get it back within a month.

Here’s why they didn’t fire him immediately: he had to train his H-1B replacements, a Chinese man and an Indian man.

Spencer shows good sense here.  That’s something that should have been decades ago.  Also, is it unfair to say that Spencer is the only good thing about the Alt Right brand?

General McMaster and I are working very well together. He is a good man and very pro-Israel,” Trump said…

After all, what else is important, right?  Cuckadoodledoo!

Here is why the Alt Right “big test” is just a destructive failure.  Alex Jones  – Alt Righter? Dugin as the ideological meme-generator for the “Western far right?”

“But Dugin’s ideas have certainly become an ideological rallying cry for the Western far right,” Michel said.

That’s laughable, since most in the “Western far right” – even in the Alt Right itself – reject Dugin and his stupidity.  And yet, because of “big tent” politics and the “Alt Right brand” genuine White nationalism, which has nothing to do with Jones and which rejects Dugin, now has to be publicly represented as an extension of both of those nitwits.  It is often said that more damage can be done through stupidity than through malice. Thanks again, Alt Right.

Der Movement Roundup: 7/28/17

Der Movement marches on.

Someone gets it right

Trump is proving another theory correct: namely, that he is an incompetent and politically unreliable buffoon. He is not loyal to people who risk their reputations for him, and his promises are worthless. The wall isn’t going to be built, and Mexico isn’t going to pay for it.

I seem to recall someone on the Far Right labeling Trump a “buffoon” from the very beginning.  Who was that, I wonder?  Probably just some crazy and bitter nogoodnik who should be safely ignored.  Hail Pepe!  Hail Kek!  Hail the God Emperor!

Sailer channels Silver. Not a feather-in-the-cap for either one of them, I think.

Some confusion about branding.

The Alt Right “brand” was a White Nationalist entryist and outreach project from the very start. But the Alt Right worked best for White Nationalists by not being exclusively associated with White Nationalism. Normies would never try the Alt Right on for size if it were an exclusively White Nationalist movement….

At other times. we’ve been told by leading Alt Righters that the Alt Right IS White nationalism (and vice versa), an equation vehemently opposed by some on the Far Right who dislike the Alt Right brand.

The Alt Right has to be one of the most ill-defined political brands in American history.

Meanwhile, “watchdog groups” are crowing about the upcoming Amren conference that will be “electric” because of the co-attendance of Richard Spencer, the “reclusive” Greg Johnson, and Sam Dickson.  As always, the anti-White Far Left enjoys schadenfreude at WN expense.

Alt Right, Rotten Orange, and Silk Road News

Several items.

I can’t really disagree with certain elements of the Alt Right on this, although I would express it differently.  McCain is a despicable subhuman. But it is not “godly justice” or any other sort of justice.  McCain is old, and he’s had cancer (skin cancer in that case) before. These things happen. Illness happens, accidents happens, bad things happen to people.  I’m not going to celebrate McCain’s illness, but I’m not going to be a phony and pretend that I wish him well.  I do not wish him well.

Interesting that the leftist cuck Trump is so hostile to the most right-wing, anti-immigration member of his cabinet – oh, yes, ostensibly for the recusal.  Also, some “alpha male” Trump is, using womanly passive aggressive techniques to humiliate Sessions into resigning, rather than just firing him and/or demanding a resignation.  Trump treats “dreamers” better than Jeff “Howdy Doody” Sessions – that should tell you something.

And let us not forget Roissy stating that Sessions as Attorney General by itself was sufficient to justify Trump’s election.  That’s not working too well, is it?  In more ways than one, since Sessions has been an absolute mediocrity, so far, in his position. Sessions would have been a better choice for VP – that wouldn’t have changed the election outcome, but would have provided Trump some impeachment insurance.  By analogy, Sessions could have been to Trump what Agnew was to Nixon, while Pence is to Trump what Ford ended up being to Nixon – an acceptable alternative for the Establishment.

Asians again.  Surprise!  Of course they support flooding America with the flotsam and jetsam of the world – it’s an implicitly anti-White agenda, and as is so often discussed here, the existential meaning of Asians is hatred of Whites.

Destructive Amoral Familism

Criminal auto-genocide.

This supports my contention that amoral familism is completely different from ethnocentrism; indeed, it is incompatible with ethnocentrism and is just individualism extended to a narrow kin group.  What can be more individualist and non-ethnocentric than justifying genocide against your own ethny on the grounds that it is profitable?

DNA Testing and Jewish Sophistry

DNA tests.

For example, I’ve come out 95 percent Ashkenazi Jewish (not a geographical population, but a gene pool with its own minor genetic idiosyncrasies due to history) and 5 percent Korean.

There are two major points to derive from this, both that I have discussed before (and labeled as “sophistry” by a Mexican lunatic).

First, as I’ve said before, these commercial tests irresponsibly assert imply a level of accuracy that they really don’t have, specifically for minor “admixture.”  And Der Movement, full of Nutzis and nitwits who do not understand the fine points of DNA testing, are equally irresponsible in believing that, for example, a Finn who tests as “100% European” is meaningfully different from another Finn who is “99% European and 1% Asian” (the former being a pureblood and the latter a mongrel – even if the two are brothers).

It was not clear exactly what tests Marks took (assuming he is truthful about his experience), but we can assume that he is not “5% Korean.”  That 5% could reflect some degree of deep Asian ancestry in the Ashkenazi genepool OR it could just be statistical noise (dependent on the test) OR it could be (as it often happens) dependent on the parental populations chosen to designate “pure” groups – an artifact of genetic distance of populations, or subgroups of populations, from those groups chosen to genetically calibrate group identity.

It is very possible to explain the 5% Korean results without going to the mendacious extreme of asserting that DNA testing is objectively meaningless in its totality. So, Marks is outrageously irresponsible but others are irresponsible as well.

Thus, by irresponsibly over-interpreting low % results (one cannot take too seriously 5% or less results for many of these tests, unless there are VERY solid reasons for assuming otherwise), both the companies and Der Movement leave an opening to filth like Marks to delegitimize the very idea of DNA testing, which itself is scientifically valid if responsibly interpreted (majority ancestry or high levels of “admixture” – albeit not in exact percentages – typically are more or less valid).

Second, the fantasy of absolute purity helps, ironically enough, to delegitimize the reality of race, thus:

Premise 1: The reality of race and the legitimacy of racial preservation depends upon absolute racial purity.

Premise 2: Absolute racial purity does not exist (as scientific studies tell us).

Conclusion: Therefore, there is no such thing as race, and racial preservation is illegitimate and irrelevant.

The fact that one can detect ancestry in these identities does not mean that they are products of nature.

Absolute insanity – proof positive that Jews are an evil, deceptive people.  I wondered how the System would “spin” the FACT that commercial DNA testing – with all its flaws – absolutely demonstrates the reality of race and can determine, with almost absolute certainty, a person’s major ancestry. Answer: DENY OBJECTIVE REALITY.  Just use REAL sophistry, deny reality that is right in front of people’s eyes, and spin a fantasy that hard reality is meaningless.  Difference between Right and Left: the Right adjusts ideology to hard reality; the Left attempts to adjust – nay, distort – reality to hard ideology.  Who do you trust – a fast-talking Jews who attempts to tell you that a Jew testing as a Jew is not “a product of nature” or Ted Sallis who tries to give a reasonable and balanced view of DNA testing?

Indeed, the word “trust” and “Jew” in the same sentence should make all your alarm bells go off.  And, really, in the end, consider – Marks is an Ashkenazi Jew and he tested as “95% Ashkenazi Jewish” – which would seem to me to be a solid result – and yet dismisses the biological validity and meaning of the results.  Focusing on the highly questionable minor “admixture” results to the exclusion of the rock-solid majority identity results is typical of the type of mendacious hand-waving characteristic of a certain ethny.  And the idea that one can just “look in the mirror” is destructive and absurd as discussed here.

Hmmm…a Jew who promotes destructive and absurd memes – who would have ever guessed?