Category: Sailer

Watch Out For That Closing Door

Have a nice trip.

Putting aside Derbyshire’s insistence that Jews are “White” – he needs to get together with Sailer and define “White” – the obvious riposte to Derbyshire is as follows. Can we make this retroactive?  Can we deport “Rosie” and “the kids?”  And you as well.  Please say yes. Thank you.  I’m sure China would thank you as well for your addition to their high, high, high-IQ population: Welcome to the Land of the (HBD) Gods.  And goodbye from America. Don’t let the door hit you on the way out.

Advertisements

Why Don’t Wealthy Whites Support Racial Nationalism?

The tin cups are empty.

Let us assume for the moment that the “movement’ deserves to be funded.  Or, more generally, let’s consider the funding of racial nationalism as a conceptual entity, independent of Der Movement, Inc.  We can ask a question.  Why aren’t there extremely wealthy Whites willing to bankroll White racial nationalism?

The question is valid because we can assume that no such bankrolling exists, not at the level that the question implies.  Indeed, if such existed today, various “movement” precincts wouldn’t have to be spending so much time with their tin cup panhandling, they wouldn’t be so concerned with deplatforming, etc.  So, assuming that they aren’t running a cunning con job or are being very adept at hiding secret funding (and it’s unlikely the types who can’t prevent their meetings from being continuously infiltrated by pitifully transparent “anti” activists would have such cunning and discipline), we can assume that no such funding exists.  Very well.  Why?

What is it about wealthy Whites that make them unconcerned about their people’s interests, or unwilling to give even if they were so concerned?

The latter part of the question can be tackled first.  One could speculate that the pro-White wealthy are being misled into contributing to more mainstream conservatism or to civic nationalism.  But that’s not what I’m talking about here – to use an Alt Right phrase that I usually try to avoid, let’s assume the wealthy White in question is “red-pilled.”  They know the score – that White nationalism is the way to go. So, what is it?  Simple fear of being discovered?  One would think that the wealthy would have their ways of discretely funneling money; on the other hand, if racial nationalists were suddenly flush with cash, the System would leave no stone unturned to find out where the funds came from.  So, fear of being labeled a “wealthy Nazi” or a “rich racist” or a “millionaire/billionaire fascist” would inhibit giving.  But still that really can’t explain the total lack of such people.  One would expect at least a few wealthy individuals very committed to the cause, and perhaps old enough and/or ornery enough that they wouldn’t care what people think, that these people would shell out the shekels.

Is it because they don’t see anything worth contributing to?  If so, I really wouldn’t blame them, but I doubt that is it either.  Even if major American WN “leaders” are thought insufficient, there’s a lot of ideological (and other) diversity among racial nationalists, even with all of the smaller groupuscules like EGI Notes.  Then there are in Europe some genuine nationalist activity that could be seen as worth support by their well-off countrymen. There are things to support if one was willing to do so.

So, let’s shift the focus.  Instead of asking why the pro-White wealthy don’t give, we can ask – why there aren’t pro-White very wealthy individuals to begin with?

Is there a psychometric explanation?  That the type of people well suited to generate/accumulate great wealth are the type to be unconcerned with racial interests?  Are these hyper-individualists?  Individualists with universal altruistic tendencies (hello, Bill Gates).  The purely selfish?  Dark triad psychopaths?  Remember Bardeche saying all the fascists he knew were poor; is there a connection?  Are Moralpaths bad at making money?  Are racial nationalists – even those with a scientific bent – insufficiently materialistic to gravitate to money-making schemes?  Are the wealthy wrapped up in their own little bubbles?  Are they so insulated from the racial problems that most Whites face that they are unaware of those problems, or wouldn’t care if they were so involved?  A la the theories of Sailer, do they see themselves as elite “Good Whites” at war with the crude, low brow “Bad White” “bigots and racists?”  Do they see the world as White-White competition?  Is it that all the Whites they deal with in their bubble are wealthy and powerful, so they are so stupidly shallow that they don’t even recognize that a racial crisis even exists?  Do they just want to “enjoy life and “sit poolside” and so do not care if “after me, the deluge?”  Is their conception of self–interest only financial, so that racial and cultural interests mean nothing?  Do they only care about protecting their wealth and status, and eschew the chaos that racial nationalism would bring (racists are not good for stock prices, I suppose)?  Do they have non-Whites as business partners – the opposite problem of them only knowing wealthy Whites – they see, on a regular basis, intelligent and successful non-Whites and see nothing wrong with that.  It’s not that the wealthy are all drawn to libertarianism; there are leftist wealthy Whites – indeed, wealthy Whites come in all political flavors except the Far Right (I think it more likely, ironically enough, to find Far Left wealthy Whites than Far Right).  Is there such a dichotomy between Economic Man and Raciocultural Man that the former and latter never meet?  But what about people who become wealthy through invention or writing, etc?  These may be more scientific or artistic types, not necessarily hedge fund manager types, and yet even the inventors and artists are unconcerned with race.  Why is it that racial nationalism can’t “hit the lottery” in the form of having someone (even a lottery winner!) who is both wealthy and deeply concerned about White interests?

Should we try and proselytize to the White wealthy?  Should we try and get racial nationalists to generate wealth?  Both?  Some alternative approach?

Der Movement, Ethnonationalism, Etc.

Der Movement.

That’s good.  Unfortunately, the same for the American Alt Right would consist of: Pepe! Hail Kek! Trump is god!  Boomers such (except Trump)!

Hey, Steverino: I thought the impossibility of knowing “what is White” will ever prevent White nationalism from every being successful?

How come you know these guys are “white” now?

Or does “white” become questionable only when it comes time for Unzian handouts?

And this Nobel Prize harken back to the time when research in America was performed by Americans, not by Chinese and Indians, overseen by their own nepotistic ethnics or by grasping Jews.

At an Alt Right blog, someone using the surname “Leonard” and claiming to live in Sardinia, champions ethnonationalism and the alleged separatist desires of Sardinians.  

I wonder though if this “Leonard” is himself an ethnic Sardinian?  Or even an ethnic Italian?  If not, perhaps, in the name of Holy Ethnonationalism, he can get the hell out of Sardinia, out of Italy, and let the natives sort out their own problems?  I also like the strawman characterizations of pan-Europeanism, par for the course for an intellectually lazy website that takes positions on important topics merely out of spite.  I’m a pan-Europeanist, and my take on Catalonia is if they want their independence, let them have it.  However, one wonders what they’ll do with it?  Import more refugees and enjoy more terrorist attacks on the streets of Barcelona? But, hey. I support their independence.  Sardinia as well, Padania, Flanders, Scotland, Basques what have you.  But all these nations are going to need, eventually, to be confederated into some European structure.  The Chinese – all 1.3+ billion of them – could care less about the ethnonationalist wants or needs of European micro-states.  Eventually, they – and the entire world of color, including Jews – are the enemy, not other Europeans.  Ethnonationalist idiots, the ones that have made the cities, fields, trenches, and beaches of Europe run red with the blood of our people, may learn that one day.

Right now, they tell us that balkanization is good: breaking up Europe into ever smaller and weaker micro-states, so the continent becomes a conglomeration of squabbling, mutually hostile postage stamp sized “ethnostates” hostile to their neighbors, and ready to team up with another state – temporarily of course – to “ethnically cleanse” their neighbor if some problems arise.  Ethnonationalism – gotta love it!


And let’s not forget what Saint Francis said in Imperium about those who want to divide Europe against itself: the culture retarders, the Michel element, the traitor within the gates, the enemy of Europe.


In any case, the lack of self-awareness of these hypocrites is amazing.  Are you a proponent of ethnonationalism?  Yes, very good.  Are you Sardinian?  If not, out of Sardinian, please, and don’t pontificate about Sardinian separatism.  It’s not your business.  And if you are not Bulgarian, Mr. Deasy, please refrain from visiting there (invited or not) and spare yourself the trauma of exposing yourself to all those “different” faces.  Of is ethnonationalism a euphemism for ethnic imperialism?  Members of certain ethnic groups apparently believe that nationalism, sovereignty, and homogeneity for their own ethnic group is imperative, while they live in other people’s nations, and dictate to these other peoples how they should run their lives. 

Citizenism and Mainstreaming Failure

More fails.

Trump so far has illustrated the underlying flaws of Sailler’s “citizens” (warmed over civic nationalism).  While Trump proved that, under the right set of circumstances, there was a narrow electable window for citizenism to come into power, he is also proving how utterly useless citizenism is – and will be – once elected.  Citizenism is “weak sauce” – half measures, compromises, furtive implicitness, which at its best would only slow the decline and delay the inevitable day of reckoning.  However, the Left – nay, the entire Establishment – views citizenism as equivalent to neo-Nazi White supremacy, and thus they oppose and sabotage even the most modest citizenist initiatives of Trump. Thus, while citizenism has proved electorally successful – at least this one time, with a very unconventional candidate – it is inherently doomed to fail, caught as it is between two pincers.  On the one hand, it really cannot solve the Race-Culture problem, because that’s not what it meant to do; on the other hand, it triggers the whole Establishment the same as if it really could effectively deal with Race and Culture.  It’s the worst of both worlds – not radical enough to actually achieve the required outcomes, but just radical enough to trigger a vociferous opposition that prevents even the most modest outcomes from being achieved.

Meanwhile, the “label Antifa as a terrorist organization” has passed the required number of signatures to be considered by the White House.  The ball is in your court, Mr. Trump – as is the question why you have to be forced to consider it (assuming he actually does, and doesn’t blow it off) rather than just doing the right thing to begin with.

I can’t think of a more wonderful test of Trump’s “God Emperorness” than this.  At what point will the sweaty homoerotic fanboys give up on their hero? This is something he should have done after the Inauguration riots.

They never learn.  Electoral failure, inability to appease opponents, unlimited ability to disgust the base. Mainstreaming is a perfect example of what happens when adherents to a plausible hypothesis refuse to give up that hypothesis even when faced with overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

That applies to almost everything about the “movement,” by the way.

Unite the Facts II: Trump Cucks Out

The orange becomes more rotten with every passing day.

Trump praises Antifa and  other urine bottle-throwing thugs for standing up against “bigotry and hate.”

“I want to applaud the many protesters in Boston who are speaking out against bigotry and hate. Our country will soon come together as one!”

At what point will the Alt Right stop the “4D chess” narratives and admit that Trump’s campaign was his greatest performance yet?


More on Charlottesville.


Read this story.  Some news outlets referred to the victim as an “innocent man.”  In other words, he is not a “neo-Nazi,” but if he was, then, oh boy, he would have deserved to have been randomly stabbed while getting out of his car.  I guess this all somehow supports pathologically insane ramblings in The Atlantic about how the Alt Right is so very powerful and all.


Truth to power.  Actually, lies and repression from power.


I don’t want to beat a dead horse but people are looking at the Unite the Right aftermath in a very short-sighted manner.  They are all considering the event itself, but ignoring the larger context behind it – that the “movement” is so very ill-prepared to take advantage of today’s propitious circumstances, and that after many decades of activism by so many people, and after so many millions of dollars of donations and “membership dues” poured into “movement” coffers.  And so we now reach a point of consummate weakness and humiliation, where “innocent” men are stabbed just because they have an “undercut.”

This is in large part due to the “movement’s” Der Tag mentality – that “Armageddon” is just around the corner, so why engage in any long-term planning and organization-building? Just head out to dem dere woods with your trusty rifle and pemmican and get ready for “the revolution.”

I remember that one “movement” quota queen was ranting in the early 2000s – and here I paraphrase from memory – that “I don’t understand why any White folks, particularly racial activists, are worrying about saving for retirement, their pensions, college tuition, or having money in their bank accounts.  Don’t they know that the system is definitely going to collapse within ten years, most likely within five years?”

Yeah…that was fifteen years ago, more or less.  And the “movement” has been saying things like that for – what? – the last 50 years or so?

Maybe it is just small sample sizes or that the “movement” selects for specific types of people, but I’ve noticed that how activists actually behave is completely opposite of what one would predict based on ethnic stereotypes.

Those individuals who are supposed to be prudent, disciplined, disinterested, far-sighted, strategic, long time preference, organized, etc. are the ones who don’t see past their noses, engage in hasty actions with little to no planning, have short time preferences that eschew thinking in terms of decades, engage in hysterical hero-worship and wishful thinking, are constantly pan-handling in the most shameful fashion (some using their own small children as money-raising props), have no organizational security, never learn from mistakes, and are angrily allergic to any criticism.  On the other hand, those who one would expect to be corrupt, short time preference, high-anxiety, neurotic, undisciplined, short-sighted, gesticulating morons are the ones counseling prudence, long-term planning and infrastructure-building, strategic organization, operational security. and critical of shameless “movement” pan-handling and womanly hero-worship.

Again, this may be a sample size and/or selection bias issue, but it has been a consistent pattern over a long period of time.

Movement Roundup: 8/9/17

Odds and ends.

Crucially important Sailer comment of world historical importance:

Personally, I haven’t had a car for the last year, at least not when my wife is at work. I probably lost a little weight from all the walking to do errands. My son has the 1998 Infiniti with 250,000 plus miles, but I hope to get it back within a month.

Here’s why they didn’t fire him immediately: he had to train his H-1B replacements, a Chinese man and an Indian man.

Spencer shows good sense here.  That’s something that should have been decades ago.  Also, is it unfair to say that Spencer is the only good thing about the Alt Right brand?

General McMaster and I are working very well together. He is a good man and very pro-Israel,” Trump said…

After all, what else is important, right?  Cuckadoodledoo!

Here is why the Alt Right “big test” is just a destructive failure.  Alex Jones  – Alt Righter? Dugin as the ideological meme-generator for the “Western far right?”

“But Dugin’s ideas have certainly become an ideological rallying cry for the Western far right,” Michel said.

That’s laughable, since most in the “Western far right” – even in the Alt Right itself – reject Dugin and his stupidity.  And yet, because of “big tent” politics and the “Alt Right brand” genuine White nationalism, which has nothing to do with Jones and which rejects Dugin, now has to be publicly represented as an extension of both of those nitwits.  It is often said that more damage can be done through stupidity than through malice. Thanks again, Alt Right.

Der Movement Roundup: 7/28/17

Der Movement marches on.

Someone gets it right

Trump is proving another theory correct: namely, that he is an incompetent and politically unreliable buffoon. He is not loyal to people who risk their reputations for him, and his promises are worthless. The wall isn’t going to be built, and Mexico isn’t going to pay for it.

I seem to recall someone on the Far Right labeling Trump a “buffoon” from the very beginning.  Who was that, I wonder?  Probably just some crazy and bitter nogoodnik who should be safely ignored.  Hail Pepe!  Hail Kek!  Hail the God Emperor!

Sailer channels Silver. Not a feather-in-the-cap for either one of them, I think.

Some confusion about branding.

The Alt Right “brand” was a White Nationalist entryist and outreach project from the very start. But the Alt Right worked best for White Nationalists by not being exclusively associated with White Nationalism. Normies would never try the Alt Right on for size if it were an exclusively White Nationalist movement….

At other times. we’ve been told by leading Alt Righters that the Alt Right IS White nationalism (and vice versa), an equation vehemently opposed by some on the Far Right who dislike the Alt Right brand.

The Alt Right has to be one of the most ill-defined political brands in American history.

Meanwhile, “watchdog groups” are crowing about the upcoming Amren conference that will be “electric” because of the co-attendance of Richard Spencer, the “reclusive” Greg Johnson, and Sam Dickson.  As always, the anti-White Far Left enjoys schadenfreude at WN expense.