And other news. And a statement of principle.
This is how Dutton responds to criticism:
Credentialists tend to be low IQ and uncreative. This is why credentials are so important to them. The aim of science is consilience, hence all important thinkers pursue areas they lack formal qualifications in. You interlocutor is a credentialist and thus a nobody.
No neuroticism there, no siree.
But, hey, I agree, we should fundamentally critique ideas, not credentials or the lack thereof. Dutton should be eschewed because – independent of credentials – he is a typically dishonest and ignorant HBDer who covers up the vacuity of his “thought” with his shtick of juvenile jackassery.
Further, by Dutton’s logic, Ted Sallis has just as much right to comment on issues such as HBD and race science as does Dutton, Lynn or anyone else. EGI Notes is consilience, don’t you know. I lack formal qualifications in psychometry; hence I am an important thinker in the field (Duttoninan logic). Lynn and MacDonald then are credentialed hacks – just following the logic of Mr. Hello Hello Hello.
Dutton’s appeal to reverse snobbery obviously has its limitations. When a paper in the scientific literature is peer-reviewed, that review is typically performed by someone with expertise (“credentials”) in the relevant field, so as to (in theory) submit an informed judgment. The fact that HBD’s Asian gods pervert the process through rampant ethnic nepotism does not alter the validity of the idea behind the process. When the military wants better nuclear weapons designs, they go to nuclear physicists and nuclear engineers, not to plumbers. Altering gene expression via CRISPR might more dependably be done by a molecular biologist rather than by a florist. A chemist might be a better source of information on how to synthesize novel organic compounds than a janitor.
Yes, it is true that all ideas must be evaluated on their own merits, but dispensing with the value of expertise through ad homenim perjoratives like “credentialism” would so distort the signal-to-noise ratio as to make scientific and technical progress virtually impossible.
But, you see, HBDers don’t care about scientific or technical progress and they certainly don’t care about the truth. HBD is a political movement aimed at replacing kinship-based racialism with a form of aracial “cognitive elitism” that benefits Jews and Asians.
I view HBDers with the same sort of visceral disgust that the average person would view a festering wound swarming with maggots.
Dutton fits in well with Spencer. Two tragicomic imbeciles.
The rise of the Ultras to prominence is an understandable response to news that Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte has granted permission for two migrant NGOs to land refugees at Italian ports, intends to reintroduce benefits and protections for asylum seekers that were previously scrapped by Matteo Salvini, and will reinstate residency permits for illegals.
Conte’s actions will inevitably further inflame a precarious situation, especially after a group of Nigerians dismembered the body of eighteen-year-old Pamela Mastropietro in Macerata, three migrants raped and murdered sixteen-year-old Desiree Mariottini in the San Lorenzo area of Rome, and a recently arrived Ghanaian man is convicted of desecrating the Basilicas of Santa Prassede, San Giovanni de Fiorentini and San Vitale.
I don’t understand. The great and good Sir Desmond Jones has told us that Italy is 100% homogeneous and will remain so until the end of time, forever and ever, amen.
Nigerians? Ghanaians? Pfah! Simply some Sicilians and Calabrians. Nothing to get worked up over.
See this. Remember, Greg Johnson has stated that Trump is a sincere man of genuine greatness, so it must be true!
Watch this. Someone forward that to The Master of Disaster, who is no doubt shedding trust fund tears over the tail-between-his-legs exit of King Andy Eggroll from the Presidential race.
Now, a statement of principle, given once again, for the benefit of newer readers.
You may have noticed that this blog is sharply critical of (among other things) what I call Der Movement. My critics – the Quota Queen grifters who sponge off of the “D’Nations” stupidly given them by naive retards – call me “crazy and bitter” and given to “the paranoid style” and “with nothing positive to contribute” (When I was writing for their own websites, indirectly helping them to rake in the shekels, then I was A-OK, of course. Of course).
I will explain, once again, what the criticism is about. I have been involved in the “movement” – in WN racial activism – since the mid-90s, that’s ~25 years, a quarter-of-a-century. That’s been both analog and digital activism, I’ve met with or corresponded with all sorts of “big names” (including a private face-to-face audience with The Great Man), I’ve written for all sorts of racialist websites and journals (including those of people who call me “crazy” today), I was interviewed for Griffin’s book, I’ve seen all sorts of activists and organizations and websites come and go, and I’ve been following all of the “movement” politics and drama, from the days of Pierce vs. Covington to the days of Johnson vs. Spencer. I’ve seen it all, so to speak.
And so I am telling you now, based on all of that experience, and based on my considered judgment (that honest readers can discern is generally sound), that the “movement” as it exists today has an ABSOLUTE ZERO chance of getting anything constructive done. It’s a joke, it’s a grift, it’s a dead end, it’s a cul-de-sac. Continuing to “throw bad money after good” (figuratively as well as literally) with this failed “movement” will lead to total defeat and to racial destruction.
We need a NEW MOVEMENT that:
1. Is based on sound principles
2. That rejects the affirmative action policy and has a merit-based leadership
3. That eschews defectives and defective paradigms
4. That thinks strategically, with long term plans and plenty of contingency planning as well
5. That not only engages in (real) metapolitics (not grifting), but also electoral politics (where and when appropriate), and (real) community building (not homosexual hook-ups at meetings)
There is only so much niche space – as long as Der Movement exists, a New Movement will not really be able to get off the ground. Hence, Der Movement needs to be opposed, and if that opposition must take the form of mocking ridicule and deconstruction, so be it.