In all cases, emphasis added.
Evola doesn’t discount the existence of biological race, and affirms that “fundamental [biological] differences” exist between all peoples, but correctly states that premising an ideology or a revolutionary movement upon “scientific” rather than “spiritual” racialism is patently absurd, given that it embraces the most degenerative aspects of modernity: egalitarianism and materialism, the two trends which are the enemy of all traditional civilizations. Evola’s racialism was “spiritual” in orientation, being radically inegalitarian and elitist in nature, following the metaphysical type of thinking articulated in his other writings.
I’m always highly amused when Nordicist Type I fetishists like Crowley swoon over the phenotypically non-gracile greasy Afrowop Julius Evola. It’s hilarious. What’s not hilarious is that these types are so outrageously hypocritical. You see, Evola’s “spiritual racialism” is good because it is “radically inegalitarian and elitist” in nature. I see. Well, you know, the “materialist” ideology that everyone in Europe to the south of Vienna (or Munich or Paris) and to the east of Berlin are inferior subhumans is also “radically inegalitarian and elitist” so I don’t understand what the problem is for the Crowley types. It’s like on Mondays they fervently support highly materialistic and elitist notions of intra-European differences and then on Tuesdays they invoke Evola’s rambling nonsense of an alternative form of “radically inegalitarian and elitist” pseudo-racialism that conflicts with their previously promoted paradigms. What’s even funnier – and something I’ve written about here before – is that Evola’s “spiritual racialism” was obviously a reaction to Guntherite Nordicism. Gunther promoted the view – still dominant in Der Movement today – that only Nordics have any worth, only they are honorable and superior, and then some guy likes Evola looks in the mirror and thinks, “Hey, I’m all honorable and superior, but I’m not Nordic.” Now, the simplest thing to do would have been just to say that honorable behavior and superior behavior is not a birthright, but something that has to be earned during one’s lifetime AND that all of that has nothing to do with racialism. But, no, being an esoteric traditionalist, with muddled “thinking,” Evola had to combine the first premise – superiority has to be earned – with the second premise of the validity of racialism. Thus, we get “spiritual race” that allows Evola to look in the mirror and assert “I’m a spiritual Nordic.” Nonsense. And how is biological race necessarily egalitarian? Just because people belong to the same ethny does not imply that they are in any way equal in ability. And the traditionalist allergy to “materialism” needs to be confronted head-on. You traditionalists keep on rambling about “Yogi Bear” and “The Men Who Can’t Tell Time” while all dem dere “materialists” will be firing nuclear-tipped ICBM’s in your direction. Who knows? Maybe the spirit of Savitri Devi will descend from Hyperborea and intercept the missiles. Anything’s possible, right? Let’s not be too “materialistic” about the possibilities now, shall we?
Sallis actually agrees with Roissy on something.
You don’t have to “make” girls into materialistic, exploitative, amoral whores. It’s the natural state of femaleness. All you have to do is remove social constraints on female sexuality and let nature take its course.
Quite right…and although the White Knighters will have fainting fits over this – all the while rambling about “Joan of Arc” – it doesn’t alter the underlying reality one bit.
A legitimate criticism of Roissyite hypocrisy:
2) CH, you seem to have split personality when it comes to easy sex.
On one hand, you advocate it, and provide lots of – useful – advice on how to get it.
On the other hand, you come down heavily on women with multiple partners.
Now, if you stick to heterosexual relationships (which you do), and given that there are about the same number of men as women, the average notch count must be about the same for both sexes (but the distribution curves could be quite different).
Yet another humiliation for The Grand Loser. The ultimate omega male.
If someone had told me three years ago this would happen today I really wouldn’t have been surprised, although I’m sure Richie and the rest of the Alt Right would have been. Long time readers of this blog very well know I identified Trump as a fraud and a buffoon as far back as 2015.