Category: Scalia

The Sallis Challenge

See at end.

According to Tacitus’s biography of Agricola, the Silures usually had a dark complexion and curly hair. Due to their appearance, Tacitus believed they had crossed over from Spain at an earlier date.

“… the swarthy faces of the Silures, the curly quality, in general, of their hair, and the position of Spain opposite their shores, attest to the passage of Iberians in old days and the occupation by them of these districts; …” (Tacitus Annales Xi.ii, translated by M. Hutton)

Jordanes, in his Origins and Deeds of the Goths, describes the Silures.

“The Silures have swarthy features and are usually born with curly black hair, but the inhabitants of Caledonia have reddish hair and large loose-jointed bodies. They are like the Gauls or the Spaniards.”

An ancient European tribe with those physical characteristics?  Not Moops or Nigerians?  No, no, a thousand times no!  Tacitus – liar!  Jordanes – liar!  I suppose this all explains why Tom Jones was described by fetishists as a “Silurian type.”

Light reading for when you’re snug in your hobbit hole. Type I fairy tales, indeed.

Scalia was obviously a full-blooded Negro, without a drop of European blood in him.

I’m sure the gamesters will tell us to eat more meat.

Bur (sic) inexplicably, President Trump is on the wrong side of this race—evidence that his unquestionable transformation of the GOP into a National Conservative party still has a long way to go, not least among his own advisors.

Yeah, real “inexplicable” and all.  Or maybe Trump is just a fraud, like EGI Notes has been saying since 2015?  And what’s with “Bur?”  Is Brimelow not getting enough Shekels to proofread the articles going up on his site?  Do the writers not use spell check?  Was that supposed to be “But” or maybe, hey, Aaron Burr is making a political comeback?  Inquiring minds want to know!

Both sides are wrong: Zimmer is a pedantic fool, missing the forest for the trees, while Sailer is ignorant of basic science.  

Early Thursday morning this was posted at EGI Notes; later that same day:

Greg Johnson says:

October 18, 2018 at 1:27 pm

I want to thank Richard McCulloch for this thoughtful and gratifyingly positive review. As for the issue of the timetable for creating the ethnostate, that is a minor point of disagreement. As for my response to his criticisms, I can’t improve on Rob Bottom’sstatement above. Once again, thanks Richard.

“Thanks for giving me a positive review of my own book…”

And then, predictably, Silver re-emerges with his usual shtick:

Having Silver and Sunic in the same comments thread is amusing to any Majority Rights graduate with a long memory.  Silver defamed Sunic as an example of an “unassimilable” Balkanoid.  Meanwhile, the truth is that Tom is fine man, a good activist, as White as anyone else at TOO, and why he wastes his time associating with those people, I don’t know.

Anyway, what with all this mutual love-fest (excluding Tom of course, who isn’t “one of the boys”), none of these paragons of racial virtue and wisdom have yet noticed that the past 50 years of “movement” activism have accomplished nothing but failure, and all the rounds of mutual self-congratulation cannot alter the fact that their model of activism has failed, and their dogma is repulsing people, not winning “hearts and minds.”

This is the reality of life in America after 50 years of your activism.

“Most Whites have no racial identity…”  That’s their own friend Taylor saying it.

Winning hearts and minds!

Try something different?  Tap into different talent pools?  Not when it threatens egos and income!

Case in point: Der Movement’s cordon sanitaire around EGI Notes.  After all, Breezy Steve struggling with meiosis is of course more useful for activism than, say, a scientifically informed debunking of Lewontin.  After all, Sailer doesn’t threaten the status quo, or the flow of shekels, and that’s what’s important.

Note to rank-and-file: if your leaders really cared about “the White race” then they would make use of relevant material regardless of its source.  But they really don’t give a fig about the White race, and you and they really know it, don’t you?

So, I issue a challenge to the likes of Johnson, Spencer, Taylor, McCulloch et al. How about penning a post telling us two things:

1. What significant and concrete accomplishments toward society-wide White racial awakening have your efforts accomplished, and, similarly, what are the accomplishments toward that end achieved by other “activists” who share your ideological vision and overall approach?

2. Going forward, how do you expect continued efforts of your type to achieve your ethnostate/racial preservationist goals?  And for this, please don’t give vague platitudes or hand-waving about “metapolitics,” but instead a realistic and comprehensive appraisal for your optimism and your adherence to your specific approach.  And, while you are at it, please explain why your approach is superior to alternatives.

I’ll give your essay a fair hearing here, and will dissect and critique it (as I’ve been critiquing the “movement” in general here) – unlike your own (dare we say cowardly) ignoring of the critiques of your approach heretofore published here at EGI Notes (never mind your pathetic “banning” of critics from your own blogs).

Politics in the News, 10/15/16

October politics.

The Clinton-Republican Establishment conglomerate may well win by making the election a referendum on Trump’s character and sex life. However, by doing so, they completely undermine any pretense that a Clinton victory has anything to do with support for open borders, globalism, radical feminism, Colored supremacy, or any of the other aspects of Clintonite/System ideology. Simply put, a Clinton victory would be due to the feminized and retarded (redundancy) American public preferring Bill Clinton’s more charismatic rape and cigar-in-the vagina behavior than they are to Trump’s more crude “pussy-grabbing.” That’s it. Now, of course, the System will try and play the electoral outcome into having some deep policy meaning, but we need to push back against that.

Why did Republicans nominate this man in the face of red flags the size of Trump Tower? A lot of explanations have been floated, but Republicans have reached no consensus.

Er…I don’t know, maybe Trump was who the voters picked, having received more votes (in a field of 16!) than any other GOP candidate in the primaries?

In retrospect, it may be that Romney was the only candidate who could have stopped Trump.

You know, the guy who strapped a dog to the roof of his car, a guy who lost an eminently winnable election in 2012, a moderate cuckservative completely out of step for the mood of 2016.

Republicans across the spectrum had supported him in 2012…

Which is why so many Whites in the GOP base stayed home in 2012, handing the election to Obama.

…and he still had a lot of goodwill from them at the start of this election cycle.

Goodwill from Establishment hucksters and from diseased brownsters whose fetid genepools drifted over from the polluted Ganges.

His opposition to an immigration amnesty…

Which was what? Increase legal immigration sufficiently to make illegal entry superfluous? Talk sense about “self-deportation” and then drop it in the general election as soon as criticism commenced?

…and his support for a tough stance on trade with China…

What? He’s upset that the US is not outsourcing even more than it is?

…would have weakened Trump’s advantage on both issues.

How come then all the folks planning to vote for Trump because of these issues stayed home in 2012?

Hey! Did the goddess and lioness Coulter date this guy too, or was it only D’Souza?

Granted, Der Movement doesn’t really care about Scalia one way or the other (what’s another dead dindu?), but still…..

A Telling Admission, 6/11/16

Strom comes clean?

He and I both worked on William Pierce’s final book, Who We Are… 


That’s great, Kevin. Keep in mind your beloved Judge Grant is derived from the stocks worshiped by Pierce’s work, while someone like the negroid Scalia likely would have awarded the materials in question to the NA. Who we are, indeed!


To be clear: I do not believe that there has ever been any manifestation of the American “movement” that is pan-European, and certainly none such exists now.   Any group or “leader” claiming such has been defrauding the dumb rubes. 

All Hail Trump the Redeemer!

He has risen!

Would a Trump administration end these race-based humiliations? Most likely, though Mr. Trump would never publicly announce this policy reversal. It is now an officially sanctioned “truth” that whites are responsible for the misbehavior of blacks; this “truth” will not vanish even if the Donald appoints Chris Christie or someone like him as Attorney General. But at least under President Trump, Americans need not worry that common criminals will be celebrated thanks to their skin color while white police officers are demonized for doing their jobs. I believe that this unstated promise helps drives the passion for Donald Trump. He is a modern day Redeemer.


Kay talks about “disparate impact” as one of the racial humiliations Whites suffer from that the Christ-like Redeemer Trump will deliver us from.


Is Kay aware that Trump has heretofore expressed support for affirmative action, and criticized Danny DeVito-look alike Antonin Scalia for being “too rough” on Blacks because of that pudgy wop’s rather mild and very weakly race-aware remarks about what colleges may be best for the Imperial Negro?
Speaking of affirmative action, you know, when I accuse the “movement” of practicing it, there is a reason, as this post makes clear.
Meanwhile, we will all stand in awe of Trump the Redeemer, supporter of affirmative action, champion of the Negro, promoter of “high-skilled” immigration, and advocate of “touchback” immigration of wetbacks. 
Hallelujah, he is risen!

In The News, 2/17/16

Some items.


It seems psychologically impossible for most Jews to comprehend that they have been partially responsible for their misfortunes throughout history, much like a lousy housemate preserves his self-esteem after being kicked out of house after house by convincing himself that the problem is with his housemates’ prejudices and intolerance, and not the fact that he dirties the house and is forgetful with the rent.


That is exactly right.  Deception and self-deception.


Europeans, namely those in Western Europe and the Anglosphere, on the other hand, are on far end of the other side of the spectrum.


Is there evidence that Eastern Europeans really have a more healthy attitude toward the Jews?


Robert Weissberg said that Jews prefer to support blacks over whites because they believe blacks to be “too stupid” to organize mass murder on the scale that Europeans were capable of in decades and centuries past.


Weissberg of course has been an honored guest – and speaker! – at Amren conferences.

Another example of this reluctant outreach to the goy can be found more in more recent times, where Ukrainian Jewish leader Vadim Rabinovich met with Marine Le Pen. Of course, they met so that they could discuss the need to “combat anti-Semitism.”


Gee, I must have missed Durocher talking about that.

Adolf Hitler, for one, insisted that patriotic Mischlinge be blended into the German gene pool by requiring any marriages be with pure-blooded Aryans.


And today’s Nutzi Hitler worshippers obsessively reject even some European peoples.