Category: sex differences

Odds and Ends, 5/3/20

In der news.

Behold the deadly enemy – the Yellow Peril.  Please read this.  They’re waging war on humanity.  Humanity does nothing in response.

HBD onanism material.  Awkward squad heavy breathing commences…three…two…one…

See this.  I don’t understand why anyone is surprised by these differences.  Indeed, East Asians, as exemplified by the Chinese, may be the most radically un-White COLORED race there is; in fact, one can make an effective argument that that East Asians are the group most unlike Whites, much more different than Whites than are, say, sub-Saharan Africans.  Are the Chinese the ultimate TROPICAL race?  Derbyshire weeps.

It’s WN 2.0:

tony hayers  Chinaski 

Woes says that the cock-pic screenshots are real, but was just him trolling some bloke 3 years ago who kept bugging him about the gay thing , so he’s like “You wanna see my throbbing thistle gristle ? ” and he got a pic off the internet. So it’s genuine in that sense. But it’s an out of context joke from 3 years ago and nothing does “out of context” better than the internet.

gus2048  Ectropy

I agree with some of this- but not all. Yes women are hypocrites- they make out like they are some violated vestal virgin when some shy difficult inexperienced geek like Woes makes a clumsy move on them- then with some good looking chad or rich footballer they are prepared to go straight to sex & behave like a street haw- They cant have it both ways- its the same with women who go into men’s jobs where some behave in an aggressive macho way- this has been my issue with some (not all) women in jobs I’ve worked in- postman/ prison officer- these feminazi women adopt this aggressive condescending attitude- so mine is- ok if you are going to act like a man I will treat you like one- so I respond with aggression- then all of a sudden they are the poor helpless little woman again & I= the sexist bully- my attitude is- if you want me to be chivalrous& make allowances then ACT like a woman. It is the same with the sexual aspect for nerds like Woes- if he did act in a way that was sexually aggressive to some poor innocent young girl- then obviously I condemn him utterly- However if it is a case of some promiscuous female- who will throw it around for some men then act outraged when some shy geek like Woes makes a fool of himself this is different. Of course even if it is such a hypocritical female- the emphasise upon us males & particularly leaders is to rise above such behaviours- so even if the woman is a THOT a proud right winger undermines himself if he gropes her- leave her to go shag some black footballer in his Porsche. My difficulty with this is that I cannot see such types of women attending our events in the first place- as they will just go along with the liberal fashion- However we are a movement of redemption & fairness. We should examine the evidence 1st & allow the possibility of this being a lonely man acting in desperation- rather than some sinister predator setting out to abuse for kicks- if it’s the latter sadly he must go…

Meanwhile, Forney has gone full flubro. It’s real easy to call people “retards” with the claim that the “models” predicting “millions and billions” of deaths incorporated mitigation.  Err, excuse me, first, Fauci always admitted the models were only as good as the data put into them, and, second, the models apparently do not incorporate viral evolution due to altered transmissibility (although the association between virulence and transmissibility is not always clear).  

The flubros don’t quite get certain things. First, you can make legitimate criticisms of the extent of the lockdowns, particularly extreme cases like Albania, without openly lying about the scope and impact of The China Plague.  Perhaps taking a look at excess mortality in New York may be useful, particularly when considering the decreased deaths due to the lack of human activity (and subhuman criminal activity).  Also, last I looked, the flu typically doesn’t result in multiple organ failure, embolisms, etc.

Second, perhaps they should remember that the morbidity and mortality of The China Plague in not in place of the flu (itself from China as well), but in addition to it.  And this addition is, apparently, more contagious, more deadly, and with more unusual, and in some cases, lasting health consequences.

Third, there is a flu vaccine (of variable effectiveness, year by year) as well as people having residual immunity to new strains from having past, somewhat similar strains (mutations do not always completely eliminate immune recognition) and/or past vaccinations (ditto).  We are currently dealing with a novel virus, with no vaccine, the specific scope of which, and long term public consequences of which, we do not yet know.

None of the above necessarily implies supporting one specific mitigation strategy over another.  It does imply that stating “it’s just the flu, bro” is indicative of a certain amount of cognitive deficiency.

By the way, folks upset about their lockdown status, and unable to buy “vape juice” or microphones, should perhaps lay the blame where it ultimately belongs – the diseased yellow monsters who inflicted this upon the world, just as they inflicted multiple other genocidal plagues upon humanity in the past.

The one thing Forney’s podcast has revealed of utility is that there are people in Der Movement whose “take” on the Millennial Woes issue is that Robertson “looks like a Med” and “has Italian DNA.”  Whew!  That’s a relief. I thought we’d be able to get through some sort of “movement” issue without Sallis’ Law being invoked, but I was wrong. Should’ve known better!  Vintage “movement” – Northern Europeans behave badly, so blame Swarthoids. Makes sense. Those greasers must be involved somehow, guddummint!

Let’s return the favor.  Look at those light eyes on Schettino – looks Nord to me!  Must be some Swedish DNA there!  Let’s see his testing results!

The fact that Amren has as a writer the deranged HBD filth Engelman, perhaps even more pro-Asian than Derbyshire, tells you all you need to know about the “race realist” faction of Der Movement.  After all, we know who “calls the shots,” in HBD, don’t we?  Although, more realistically, she’ll look like this. And no, Engelman, her name is not “Ben Dover.”

This is WN 2.0.  This fellow gets retweeted by Johnson (on another matter). I’m shocked, shocked I say!

High standards of entry? The typical rank-and-file “activist” is a small step above (if at that) a drooling idiot, and the “leadership” are a bunch of tragically incompetent affirmative action cases whose only “productive” skill is grifting.

What would low standards look like?

Maybe humans are retaliating against the genocidal war being waged by Asians against humanity?  Maybe people weight the risk factors for covd-19 infection?

“They let it spread.”  Of course they did.  And they are laughing over it, laughing at the pain, anguish, and death they have inflicted on humanity.

Asia is waging war against humanity and humanity responds by doing absolutely nothing. When will YOU take a stand against Asia?

Is this sarcasm?  If not, maybe we should have Balkanoids chiming in about the Ottoman reality, not Quota Queen cuckolds.

Icelander breaks Englishman’s record.  Der Movement doesn’t know whether to celebrate or weep.  Oh the agony!

Apostate Woes

And other news.  Some notes on scifi.

Read this utter nonsense.  That represents the archetype of the stereotypical silly, superficial, moronic, and childish apostate from Far Right politics.

First, we note that this individual’s involvement in Far Right politics was motivated by personal issues, not by ideology nor by any sort of deep ideological commitment and intellectual thought process. These types are always motivated by personal problems, a need to “belong,” a need to “rebel” against family and society, a childish need to “shock “and draw attention to themselves in a narcissistic, infantile manner. Thus, if they no longer have their personal issues, or if they discover that their Far Right comrades are more interested in actualizing political and metapolitical goals rather than being a social worker for defective losers, or if these types satisfy their person needs and mask their inadequacies through other activities, then they no longer require, or depend upon, their masquerade as a “Far Right activist.”  As there was never any authentic ideological motivation or commitment, the loss of their personal need for self-validation through rightist politics results in repudiation of their insincere belief system.  Indeed, they lash out at authentic Far Right activists who they see as “failing them,” rather than understanding that the reverse is true.  Truly pathetic.

Second, such specimens exhibit a truly childish worldview in which the objective Threat of Color must mean that every single Colored on the face of the Earth is a hostile, White-hating, criminal monster. Thus, finding some Colored individuals, even just one, who do not behave as depraved monsters is sufficient for these faux-activists to decide that the entire Colored Threat is false. This is reflective of their navel-gazing, highly personal view of rightist politics.  It’s not that masses of Coloreds, on a global level, are a threat to White racial interests; oh no, their focus is on how individual Coloreds interact with them personally.  Meet a single friendly Negro who doesn’t bash your head in and steal your wallet and your entire racial worldview immediately evaporates.  All of the objective facts that ostensibly motivated your political activism evaporate if some non-White nods hello to you on the street.  It sounds ludicrous, but this is actually the “epiphany” that many of these airheaded nitwits actually have.


Ultimately, the objection of these apostates is that have been personally disappointed by the “movement.”  It didn’t satisfy their personal and private needs and wants. Of course,the same can be said, to a lesser degree, of non-apostates who simply, quietly drop out of the “movement” “scene” without making a fuss about it.  I remember being quite stunned by one drop-out of WN 1.0 analog activism who explained himself to me thus  -“they (note: his “movement” colleagues) only pretended to like me because of the work I was doing for the group, they didn’t like me for who I am; they didn’t care about me as a person.”  Not wanting to be rude, and not wanting to add to his “emotional trauma,” I hid how shocked I was by that comment, but I remember thinking – of course that is true, how could you ever been so naive to believe otherwise?  


Why do people working together on a project, for a cause, have to like each other, and be genuine, caring friends?  That seems to me to be a quite feminine attitude – we all must hold hands, tiptoe through the tulips, and agonize about our “feelings.” No. Employees at a company do not have to like each other, players on a sports team do not have to like each other, faculty in an academic department do not have to like each other, students in the same class do not have to like each other, and people collaborating in a “movement” do not have to like each other either. Any friendships and/or relationships that develop are a byproduct, a side-effect, of the official interaction; it is not required or in any way necessary. Likewise, a “movement” does not have to satisfy the personal needs and desires of an activist. If it does so, that’s great, but it is no necessary (granted, the “movement” must not repulse its activists, but the lack of a negative is not the same as the presence of a positive).  


Anyone who leaves a “movement” because of personal disappointment in how it affected them in the sense of not fixing their deep-seated issues is not the sort of person who should have been involved in that “movement” to begin with. The problem is not Normal Lowell. The problem is the idiot who wrote that article.

This is one reason I vehemently oppose the “big tent” strategy supported by poor judgment, failed Quota Queen “leaders.” Yes, we should have outreach.  Yes, we need to recruit.  Yes, we need to reach out to the White masses.  Yes, eventually, we want a mass movement. But, the leadership cadre, the activist core, the human material that makes up your movement – assuming it is a real movement and not a fraud – need to be high quality, genuine, authentic, ideologically committed and serious people. The typical Der Movement approach of accepting any and all Whites who can fog a mirror held up to their nose and who can mumble memorized gibbering of fossilized “movement” dogma is a recipe for failure. Particularly, accepting any and all “youth,” including and especially troubled teenagers and young adults, people who are so pathetically eager for acceptance and belonging, people whose ONLY positive characteristic is being White and ostensibly on board “the movement train,” without any other positives to contribute, this is an error.  There needs to be a long apprenticeship, a seasoning, a series of trials and tests, before a person is fully accepted.

Well, well, well – the Millennial Woes scandal. Sallis right, Johnson wrong. Sallis is Milady-skeptic, Sallis promotes MGTOW, Sallis questions the presence of women in the “movement,” Sallis demands we have standards for leadership instead of affirmative action, Sallis opposes the “big tent approach.”  Johnson takes the opposite view on those issues.


I have to say I know little about this Millennial Woes person.  My understanding is – and if I am wrong I stand corrected and I do apologize – is that he is a cigarette-smoking bisexual Millennial Scottish WN 2.0 Alt Righter who makes videos and speaks at Far Right conferences. He apparently is on good relations with Johnson, and is apparently very well known among WN 2.0 Alt Right circles (which is why I know little about him, given that I am vehemently opposed to WN 2.0 and the Alt Right).

In any case, in summary, this latest “movement” humiliation and Quota Queen dust-up involves the Millennial Woes (who is openly known as Colin Robertson) scandal, which apparently has to do with some yeastbucket complaining about Robertson, re: something sexual, and Collett investigating while Robertson steps away from activism (at least for now). Apparently, Gaslighting Greg Johnson is taking a pro-Woes position while crazed ethnofetishist Colin Liddell is hostile.  Apparently the two Colins have had a falling out.  


Far from it for me to be a “low information moralizer;” so since I know nothing more about this than what is stated above, and since I don’t have a dog in the fight to care enough to learn more, I’ll limit my comments to broad generalities:


1. I could say this is what happens when you let women involved in “movement” “activism.”  But that would be unfair since (a) homosexual sexual harassment occurs in WN 2.0 as revealed by Pilleater, and (b) point 2 below.


2. I remember the WN 1.0 analog meetings we knuckle-dragging Nutzi Neanderthal Boomers and Gen Xers were having back in the 90s. There were women at those meetings.  Somehow, there were never any scandals of either the heterosexual or homosexual nature.  Fancy that.  It’s almost as if – perish the thought! – WN 2.0 is far inferior to WN 1.0 in human material and in the seriousness and judgment of its participants.  It’s almost as if – gasp! – Millennials and other paragons of “youth” act like jackasses.  


3. This is hypocrisy.  See this for what I mean by that.  Simply outrageous, particularly in the context of the previous links. A completely bizarre and cringeworthy tweet. Milady objects. Go to CC meetings at your own risk as well, Pilleater.


4. Once again, Der Movement is humiliated.  And you can’t say you haven’t been warned here at this blog (and at Western Destiny) of what an utter disaster the “movement” was, is, and always will be.  Now, WN 1.0 was indeed an utter failure and a humiliating disaster, but WN 2.0 is infinitely worse, essentially 2.0 repeats the errors of 1.0 and then adds its own layers of tragicomic stupidity. It may very well be true that Millennial Woes did nothing wrong; it may very well be mendacious yeastbucketism. It doesn’t matter. Having these WN 2.0ers publicly humiliate themselves with their drama and scandals and feuds does damage to pro-White activism, regardless of the details underlying it all.


Johnsonian hypocrisy:

Embittered people like Colin Liddell are now functionally indistinguishable from antifa. 

I despise Liddell, but that from Johnson is unfair and hypocritical.  After all, Spencer can say the same about Johnson and his obsessive critiques of Richie Rich.  Why is it that people like Johnson, who promote the idea of “punching right,” have glass jaws when it comes to criticism of themselves and their friends?  Liddell has just as much right (no pun intended) to “punch right” as does Johnson. Third party observers can judge for themselves who they believe is correct or incorrect.


All of these individuals – Johnson, Spencer, Colin Robertson, Colin Liddell, Steadman, Parrott and Heimbach, Brimelow and Derbyshire, Forney and Friberg, all of the HBDers and “race realists” (Taylor, KMacD, etc.),  Anglin and Roissy, Duke and Strom, the great man on the mountaintop (*) and his feuding rival Covington, Gliebe and the swastika-soled boots, all of them – should be observed with bemusement, from a distance, from the viewpoint of a third party observer. Taking sides in these feuds and scandals is a useless exercise, because BOTH sides in each case are no damn good. A pox on both their houses. The only reasonable interpretation of this latest nonsense is that it is yet another reason to eschew Der Movement, Inc. and look toward a New Movement.  


Instead of giving those grifters money, donate to Salter instead.  On Genetic Interests alone is more valuable than all the “work” of those aforementioned “activists” put together.  


*I will say this though, for all my criticism of Pierce and his behavior and ideology, it is true that American White nationalism collapsed after his death and never recovered.  And it appears the UK is not any better.  Was the death of Pierce the real end – or at least the beginning of the end – of the WN 1.0 era?  Then there was a brief interregnum, and the rise of Spencer and Johnson (more feuding rivals) marked the rise of WN 2.0.  


Original hypothesis – given the level of neoteny in East Asians, “White male yellow fever” sexual interest in East Asian females is sublimated pedophilia.


New insight – given the relative lack of sexual dimorphism in East Asians, “White male yellow fever” sexual interest in East Asian females is sublimated homosexuality.


New synthesis, updated hypothesis – given the combination of neoteny and relative lack of sexual dimorphism in East Asians, “White male yellow fever” sexual interest in East Asian females is sublimated pederasty. 


Is “yellow fever” masking a desire to have sex with underage boys?  Does this mean that HBD is sublimated pederasty?  Are there psychological and biometric analyses that can be performed to test these hypotheses?


Typical nonsense. The best science fiction writer (by far) is the late Gene Wolfe. Nothing that anyone else has written surpasses The Book of the New Sun. That book series is the scifi/fantasy equivalent of Moby Dick. And in actuality, Bradbury’s best work is a non-scifi novel, Dandelion Wine, about an America long gone. Dune (which I have read, and saw the movie and miniseries), is a very good book, but nothing compared to Wolfe’s best. van Vogt’s Voyage of the Space Beagle is good stuff. For more light-hearted fare, Jack Vance is unsurpassed; beginners should start with his Dying Earth short tales, which have been criticized by feminists as too male-oriented, which should be the best seal of approval there is. Vance’s novels involving Cugel (one of the greatest characters in scifi/fantasy history) are first rate and hilarious, and Planet of Adventure is excellent, as are his Demon Princes stories, particularly the finale, The Book of Dreams. Asimov is over-rated, but his Foundation series is indeed excellent, and thought-provoking from a broad civilizational view. There are many other great scifi books and writers. Conflating the best to Herbert and Bradbury is absurd.

This picture does not inspire confidence in current coronavirus research.

I agree with what Johnson says here.

The American Right has morally and intellectually discredited itself with its reaction to the corona pandemic.

Very true, but as any reader of EGI Notes well knows, you read that here first, many weeks before Johnson’s belated epiphany.  The few times the Quota Queens write or say anything useful, there are far behind the curve of this blog.


And of course, by letting deranged scum like “Stronza” post comments on his moderated blog, Johnson himself must be counted among the rightists who have been so discredited.


It’s just the flu, bro!

The biography of Jack Ma?  ET phone home!

Not good enough, Trump. Please release the data.  I believe it, but how can we all build treason evidence against HBD without the stone cold facts?  Keep in mind that EGI Notes was among the first Far Right blogs promoting the “Chinese lab release” paradigm (while the HBD filth were promoting Chinese government propaganda lies about a fictional “American bioweapon.”


A better title – can you trust Der Movement?

I have a distinct dislike for the journalistic class as a whole. They do not so much report news as collectively make the news, according to a peculiar pack mentality, which combines commonly-agreed designated good guys and bad guys, but also sometimes brutal and erratic shifts collective opinion, not according to the whims of an official chief, but a strange and disturbing hive mind.

A better version:

I have a distinct dislike for Der Movement as a whole. It does not so much report the truth about race as collectively distort the truth, according to a peculiar Nordicist and/or HBD pack mentality, which combines commonly-agreed designated good ethnies and bad ethnies, but also sometimes brutal and erratic shifts collective opinion, not according to the whims of an official chief, but a strange and disturbing hive mind.

Odds and Ends, 3/31/20

In der news.

Sallis right once again.

It very well can be a wild-type unmodified virus that was being studied in the Wuhan biowarfare labs.  This whole “lab release = bioengineered” is gaslighting for the rubes. 

…Ebright doesn’t exclude the possibility that the virus’s spread started from poor biosecurity in China. A leading theory is that the virus jumped from wildlife to humans. Some researchers speculate this happened at a live-animal market where exotic species are sold for food. But Ebright also notes that such wildlife viruses are collected in laboratories, including in Wuhan. “Therefore, it’s also a possibility that this virus entered the human population through accidental infection of a lab worker carrying out field collection, or an accident by a lab worker characterizing the sample in a laboratory,” he said.

Meanwhile, HBD filth – who need to be investigated for FARA violations – promote the Chinese government absurdity of an ‘American bioweapon.”  

As I’ve been predicting, the Right continuously self-destructs.  The Right continuously constitutes an endless humiliation.

Behold the subhuman filth that are literally worshipped by the HBDers.

Gee, it looks like those high trust northern hunter gatherers are at it again, eh Kevins (Strom and MacDonald)?

Germany has imposed harsh travel restrictions, essentially entering a bunker mentality amid creeping hysteria seizing the country. Only German nationals or foreign citizens with an “urgent reason to travel” may cross the border. Shockingly, however, refugees from the Middle East and Africa arriving at Germany’s border in search of asylum are given the red carpet treatment into the country…To do so in the middle of a deadly global pandemic is a bit like puffing away on a cigarette at a gas station. At the very least it makes for some very poor optics.

After all, Germany is currently experiencing living conditions not witnessed since World War II. Even in the capital, Berlin, panic buying has led to empty store shelves amidst a foreboding climate of helplessness and despair…should Germany be granting asylum to refugees who have not only entered the European Union illegally, but have necessarily traveled through high-infection countries, like Italy and Spain, in their personal quest to receive asylum?

But, hey, remember, this is the Master Race, let’s have more Revilo Oliver speeches about dem dere purebred Germanics, and we must have Germanics as leaders of the American “movement.”  What with “swastika-soled boots” (made in China, by the way), and other such important innovations, we’ll be dancing through cemeteries (these days, literally, I suppose) to victory.  Hail Germania!

The same Zturd who looks at the charnel houses of Italy and New York and deems covid-19 akin to an “urban legend” provides us with the gibbering fantasies of a hysterical right-wing retard tin foil hatter.

Zturd can stop hiding under his bed from that military coup leader Pelosi and her cunning henchmen.  Seven Days in May, coming soon!   Of course, it is, say, 1000x more likely for Trump to die from covid-19 than to be removed by a military coup, but the Right has never let small things like statistical sanity stand in their way.

Der Movement, Der Movement, Der Movement marches on.

How covid-19 is affecting the mannerbund.  Traditionalism takes a hit.

Inspired by his insight about how most Italian-Americans are of Northern Italian descent (hint: they’re not), HBD retard Mangan does some chin ups.  Gotta get fit to resist that Pelosian military coup, I suppose.

Winner of the March 2020 Ted Sallis award for online commentary:

Dr. Rieux
Blacks emigrating from North America to Africa will raise the mean IQ’s on both continents.

Dem dere high trusters.  Well, East Asian nations like Sweden are better suited to deal with this crisis than are sub-Saharan African nations like Italy and Spain, so I’m sure it will all work out for the best.

Milady once again contributes to the scientific and societal response to the The China Plague crisis in the manner to which she is best suited.  Remember men – do not objectify milady!  Me too!

Behold Milady, Behold Der Movement

Odds and ends.

That’s right, blame Trump because you and your husband are/were a couple of retards.

It’s not clear how much chloroquine the man ingested, and Banner Health said he and his wife ingested a version of the chemical that’s used to clean aquariums.

To this day, my morning routine consists of exercising while listening to some of my favorite metal bands like Manowar, Bathory, and Goatmoon. 

Type I alert!

While living in Eastern Europe…

As an ethnic Dane, violating the ethnic homogeneity of other peoples.

As white people of European descent, we are expected to play a game where everyone else is allowed to cheat but we are the only ones forced to play by the rules. And what are the rules? The unspoken rules are that white people aren’t allowed to have an identity or be proud of our heritage. White people aren’t allowed to have an in-group preference or freedom of association.

Does “freedom of association” include Eastern Europeans rejecting having this scumbag use their nations as brothels?  Does it include Hungary deporting John Morgan?

Through the years, I’ve made a lot of mistakes in my careers, relationships, and overall priorities in life.

Writing for Counter-Currents, for example.

In a recent article Arndt discussed women’s tactics in attracting men, such as dressing to show breasts.[ii] Her story, appropriate titled “Busted: The Politics of Cleavage and a Glance”, combined anecdote, interviews and behavioural science. She drew on research on male–female differences in sex drive to argue that women who dress sexily in public are flaunting their sexual power…

Behold milady (emphasis added):

A young man and woman are having a friendly chat after a yoga class. The fresh-faced blonde seems totally relaxed but then she freezes. ”Did you just look at my chest,” she asks angrily, arms firmly folded.

”Yep,” mutters the bloke sheepishly. Her response is fierce. ”Can’t I go to one yoga class without being ogled by some jerk?”

Instead of being cowed, he takes her on, launching into a passionate defence of his action: ‘If you really didn’t want me to stare at your beautiful breasts, you’d be wearing something other than a purple sports bra covering maybe one-third of your perfect tits,” he argues, suggesting, among other things, that he’s biologically programmed to scan for life-giving breasts for his future offspring. He’s cute, passionate and ultimately convincing. She ends up asking him out for coffee.

But when young women stand in front of mirrors on a Saturday night, adjusting their cleavage, seeking ever greater exposure, maybe they need to think more about what they are doing. While there are women who claim they dress sluttishly just to make themselves feel good, the fact remains that, like the protesters, the main message sent is about flaunting women’s sexual power.

It’s an ”UP YOURS” gesture of the most provocative kind.

This girl hasn’t a clue but plenty of other women know exactly what they are doing, as they make clear in internet discussions of this issue.

”I luv my 36DDs and show them off. I like to see men drool.”

”It’s so funny when some men get caught cos they have that ‘Am I in trouble?’ look on their face!”

”It is a tease thing … men are so weak.

”We have such power over them.”

Jean* is a 33-year-old, extremely attractive Sydney divorcee completing her PhD in physics. She has a fit body and large breasts, which she likes showing off in revealing clothes. When she ”gets the girls out”, she enjoys the subtle looks, even a discreet compliment about her body from the right man.

”A quick glance from them, a little moment of recognition, and then back to the conversation. It’s part of the dance, hinting at a possible connection,” she says.

Are some allowed to look and others not?

”Well, I think there’s a sort of sexual food chain and I prefer to engage with people on a similar level as me. Sometimes it feels sleazy when I’m way out of the observer’s league, like if they’re really old or fat or ugly.”

That’s the problem. She’s advertising her wares to the world, not just her target audience, and somehow men are expected to know when they are not on her page. Jean describes at length the subtle dance, based largely on non-verbal behaviour, that she uses to show men when attention is welcome. But as we all know, many men are lousy at that stuff – the language totally escapes them.

”In one of my workshops, I remember a guy describing women flaunting their bodies as a form of ‘biological sexual harassment’ towards men, to which most of the group gave a collective nod,” Tiller says. 

The internet is bristling with men writing about what they regard as women’s sexual arrogance. Provocative female attire is an assault against men, writes Giovanni Dannato for In Mala Fide, an online magazine of heretical ideas. He argues women exposing…amounts to ”an act of aggression in which they use the power of their sex as a weapon”, he writes.

F. Roger Devlin, a political philosopher who writes challenging material on gender issues for The Occidental Quarterly, points out these beta males have long been tearing their hair out trying to discover what on earth they have to do to make themselves acceptable to the girl next door. They get the message that what women instinctively want is ”for 99 per cent of the men they run into to leave them alone, buzz off, drop dead, while the one to whom they feel attracted makes all their dreams come true”.

But surely men have a right to show what it’s like to be on the receiving end. There’s a great scene in the animated television comedy Family Guy, where Peter Griffin, the overweight, ugly, blue-collar dad, lets fly about Lindsay Lohan putting on her little outfits and jumping around on stage throwing ”those things” in front of his face. ”What am I supposed to do? What do you want from me?” he asks plaintively. But he knows the answer all too well: ”I’ll tell you what you want. You want NOTHING. We all know no woman anywhere wants to have sex with anyone and to titillate us with any thoughts otherwise is just bogus.”

Griffin’s howl of protest is based on the simple truth that some men spend their lives in a state of sexual deprivation, dealing with constant rejection. Roy F. Baumeister is a psychology professor at Florida State University who has extensively researched gender difference in sex drive. ”Sexual frustration is almost inevitable for the majority of men and not just occasionally. They won’t have enough partners or even enough sex with one partner to satisfy their wishes,” Baumeister writes, concluding, ”the tragedy of the male sex drive” is men’s state of perpetual readiness, which so rarely meets its match.

Of course men are going to want to look – ”it feels like there’s a magnet in her chest” one man complained. 

”He tells the story of a meeting with a young woman wearing a fairly fitted yellow dress, ”popping out of the top”.

”The conversation was about the rate I was going to charge them for advertising. As I looked down at my notebook and did some basic sums, I realised that she was leaning forward, deliberately showing her tits, presumably to throw my concentration.” He called her bluff.

”I started to laugh and made a comment about putting her body on the line for the business!”

She backed off, embarrassed, and he got his deal done.

She’d yell abuse at guys catcalling from cars at her. ”I can wear whatever I want!” Only now does she think about the confused young men she left in her wake, the mixed messages she’d sent them. ”Deep down I was much more aware of my power than I actually let on.”

But, remember men – don’t objectify milady!  Don’t distract milady as she works hard to solve the mysteries of the cosmos and create new cultural artifacts. Joan of Arc!  All of this demonstrates that homosexuals have no business whatsoever discussing heterosexual male-female relations and no business discussing the role of milady in the general society. Only heterosexual men have a full understanding of the malicious scope of female perfidy.

Spencer is right here…of course, this blog said this first.

Mudshark Annie – Quota King retard.

It’s a nothingburger!  Wrong, wrong, they’re always wrong.

How does that HBD cognitive elitism look now?   Meanwhile, it’s Sallis who has always been right – the existential meaning of Asians is hatred of Whites.  Yellow or brown it doesn’t matter – Asians gonna Asian.

Case in point.  Asians are psychopathic. Right, “Tricky Dick” Lynn?

Let’s assume for a moment that at least some of the crude anti-Asian comments by Whites actually occur. What’s the net political outcome of that Bunkerism?  True enough, it can have some beneficial effects. For example, it can provoke Asians into revealing the seething anti-White hatred that defines the existential meaning of the Asian peoples. It can inflame White-Asian hostility and expose Derbyshire’s “Arctic Alliance” for the absurdity that it is. However, on the other hand, given White weakness and pitiful SJW tendencies, this Bunkerism creates undeserved sympathy for the monsters who have infected the world. Unfortunately, this latter effect will likely predominate over the former. So, it’s best to eschew crude Bunkerism that has no real beneficial political effect and concentrate instead on political anti-Asianism. Instead of mindless cursing, how about arguments being made to throw Asian-“Americans” into internment camps or, better still, repatriate them to their ethnic/racial homelands? Those arguments not only have the same net effect of strengthening White-Asian animus, but can provoke debate and discussion. Let the Asians explain why they should not interned or repatriated, and, no doubt, by their hysterical hate-filled reactions will display to open-minded Whites precisely why that should be their fate. That’s a lot better than Bunkerite mindless cursing.

Something ominous = Chinese people.  Those bizarre aliens (ET phone home) will one day kills us all. They’re killing many of us today.

Colored is as colored does – the TROPICAL Japanese as part of the rising tide of color TROPICAL ALLIANCE against Whites.

Are Asians exempt from this law?  They’ve been bragging online about terrorizing people with fake coughing.  How come they get a free pass?  Yellow Privilege?

When are German troops going to go there to aid the Turks and help force migrants into Greece?

E. Michael Jones is an absolute moron and a turd, but this excerpt from a comment left at Counter-Currents provides food for thought:

And Jones may rant against Jews but I prefer that to Jared Taylor’s quietism. Sometimes I wonder if the neo Wasp Taylors aren’t waiting to make a new deal with the Chosen People – one that will leave ordinary whites of lower IQ’s including Anglos at the bottom of the some High Anglo – Jewish libertarian matrix.

But now I think I may be ranting myself. That is because lately I have begun to wonder if the WASP isn’t undercover in WN and articles like this that dismiss Jones as crank and ranter increase this suspicion So I just need to say = and even the Germanophile Jones won’t say this -the WASP’s contribution to white civilization in the last century was to team up with the Jew to bring down fascism – the fascism which was the white’s chance to save our civilization. That is not a good recommendation for a neo WASP resurgence in WN. WASP’s give it up to the Jew.

Andrew Fraser weeps. 

The “movement’s” ethnic affirmative action program and the HBD-Nordicist-ethnonationalist alliance are both criticized in one fell swoop with that comment – although the letter writer doesn’t know he/she/it has done so.

It would be a good idea to better understand why different people, even of the same age cohort, can have such radically different disease courses with the China Plague. There should be studies done comparing people matched for age, underlying co-morbidities (or the lack thereof), sex, etc., with the individuals tested for (a) genetic ethnoracial ancestry (via population geneticists not “testing companies”), (b) full genome sequencing looking for gene variants, and (c) full human gene microarray analysis looking at gene expression (protein arrays can also be performed given the possibility of regulation of gene expression at the translational level – after all, ultimately, what we are looking at are proteins and their functions [with the exception of, e.g., functional RNAs]).

Human Symbiosis

What can we say about symbiosis in human interactions?

Symbiosis (from Greek συμβίωσις “living together”, from σύν “together” and βίωσις “living”)[2] is any type of a close and long-term biological interaction between two different biological organisms, be it mutualistic, commensalistic, or parasitic. The organisms, each termed a symbiont, may be of the same or of different species.

Let’s consider some aspects of symbiosis in human interactions, with an emphasis on inter-ethny relations.  This is not meant to be a comprehensive or final determination but merely an introduction, so these paradigms can be applied in future discussions when and where appropriate.

From the standpoint of gross EGI – looking at ethnic genetic interests without doing a full “balancing of the books” with respect to all the costs and benefits that determine the final outcome of adaptive fitness – then the presence of any genetically distinct minority group (no matter how small the genetic distance to the majority group) within a majoritarian state will exhibit parasitism, or at least amensalism, with respect to the majority group. The majority group is always harmed by the presence of the minority group with respect to gross EGI because the fixed carrying capacity of the territory reduces the final number of majority members that can fill that niche space, due to the presence of the minority group. This is akin to Yockey’s “Culture Parasitism” in which the parasitic group (in Yockey’s thesis, the outgroup is defined in terms of culture rather than genetics) reduces the numbers of the host High Culture majority group.  If the parasitic group benefits (as is usual) from living in the territory of the majority group that is parasitism; if there is no benefit, it is amensalism. The majority is harmed in all cases.  If the majority fights back, then we have competition, which can be harmful to both sides.

This conflict can end once assimilation of the minority group takes place; the minority becomes part of the majority so that symbiosis per se is not relevant.  However, the genetic costs to the majority of assimilating the minority is harmful to the EGI of the original majority stock (and is of course harmful to that of the minority stock). Once assimilation is complete however, we have a new people with its own set of genetic (and other) interests.

What about net EGI – the final, adaptive fitness outcome when the “balancing of the books” is complete – as well as proximate interests?  We can consider the various types of symbiosis.

Mutualism – both groups benefit.  For groups living in different polities it is possible – there can be alliances, cultural or economic exchanges, many possible types of mutualistic interactions, particularly between relatively closely related groups. For groups living in the same polity, this becomes more problematic.  One can envision two relatively similar groups supporting each other in competition with more alien competing outgroups – and this alliance become more tenable when the closely related allied groups are undergoing inter-marriage and assimilation. The various European ethnic groups in America are an example of this. Of course, this imposes costs on gross EGI; however, it may, dependent upon context, boost net EGI, if the benefits of the alliance – e.g., outcompeting the more genetically and culturally alien outgroups – outweigh the genetic costs in diluting a more concentrated EGI.

Commensalism – one group benefits while the other is neither harmed nor helped. Commensalism is common in individual or small scale human interactions.  Person A throws out some garbage, while person B finds that garbage useful and derives benefit from it. B is helped, while A is neither helped nor harmed.  It is difficult to think of examples – even when disregarding gross EGI – where larger scale human interactions within the same territory are truly commensal.  Perhaps, interactions between different separate nations can be commensal – the byproducts (even memetic) of one nation/people/ethny benefit another and the originator of the product is neither helped nor harmed.  But if both groups are residing in the same niche space, truly authentic examples of commensalism would be relatively rare.  Usually there are at least some benefits or harms, even if relatively marginal, to one group in contrast to the more obvious benefit enjoyed by another group. Unfortunately, many human interactions in the same niche space is zero sum game – parasitism, predation, and competition will be more common than commensalism. Given the relatively rarity of a true lack of effects on large groups, mutualism will be more common than commensalism as well.

Parasitism – one group benefits while harming the other group is harmed. The classic example is of Jews living in White nations, with the Jews benefiting and the Whites being harmed. This has been such a constant paradigm throughout history that a Wikipedia article has been made on it.  Of course, in some cases, Jewish parasitism descends into predation and/or if the afflicted host peoples fight back, competition.

Bowery’s ideas about extended phenotypes in human groups – as an extension of some of Dawkins’ work – are relevant here. One group controls the behavior of a second group so that the former benefits and the latter are harmed; here the second group acts as the extended phenotype of the first.  Jews controlling the societal milieu so as to modify White gentile behavior for Jewish benefit (and White harm) comes to mind; thus, White gentiles often become the extended phenotypes of Jews. The Whites are unable to control their own behavior and behave self-destructively to serve Jewish interests.

Are White HBDers the extended phenotypes of Jews and Asians, particularly East Asians?  Were “White ethnic” members of the National Alliance the extended phenotype of William Pierce? 

Free-riding also comes into play here. When one group benefits from collective social goods to which they do not contribute, they benefit while the contributing groups are often harmed, since they carry the burden of contributing not only for themselves but for the non-contributing group. That is parasitism.

Predation – one group openly attacks and destroys the other.  For example, considering the role Jews play in America controlling sociopolitical systems to benefit themselves at the expense of Whites, that can be considered parasitism; however, considering Jews in the Soviet Union killing millions of Slavs, that is predation. The criminal attacks of Coloreds against Whites in multiracial nations is also predation, although of course parasitism is another key feature of Colored-White relations (typically, Coloreds benefit while Whites are harmed, although Negro slavery can be an example of the reverse). Race replacement, displacement, and White flight are examples of parasitism moving into predation, with undertones of competition when, rarely, Whites resist.

Neutralism – no effects for either group. Neutralism is possible between peoples living in separate nations, but for people living in the same territory, neutralism is extremely unlikely. There will be some types of positive and negative effects for either or both groups. There may be limited examples of very closely related groups living in the same polity that can have, in certain contexts and for certain periods of time, neutralistic relations, but that is rare.  More distant groups are unlikely to be neutralistic, even when disregarding gross EGI, because the differences between them will always manifest in proximate frictions that affect net EGI.

Amensalism – one group suffers no benefit or harm, but the other group is harmed.  Like commensalism, this is expected to be rare, since it is unlikely that the harm to one group in a polity would not benefit another. Perhaps there can be examples with relatively closely related groups.  If the groups are in separate nations it can be possible that the activities of one harms the other without benefiting the one causing the harm.  Symbiosis in which both groups are affected in some way would be more common than that in which one or both groups are not affected at all.

Competition – both groups are harmed. Competition is considered harmful to both sides, and often this is the case, at least until one side emerges victorious (if such occurs), after which the relationship may change (to, e.g., assimilation, parasitism, etc.).  

Both Yockey and MacDonald have written that the reaction against an intrusive group, even when necessary, can harm the group resisting.  If I recall, Yockey invoked the analogy of a fever, which, while helpful in combating the invasive pathogen, also harms, at least in the short run, the invaded host.

On the other hand, one can think of situations where, in the long term, competition could be beneficial to one or both sides even in the absence of a “final victory.”  Some would say one reason why Europe had so many advancements was the competition between different European nations – a completion that forced and fostered a constant “arms race” of competitive advantages – as opposed of a centralized massive Chinese state lacking in the dynamism of such constant internal turmoil. Of course, today, the level of competition is global, so the same dynamism could be provoked by a confederation of Europe vs. China.  

However, if one defines competition as something which is inherently harmful to both sides, then a situation in which competition is beneficial to one side but not the other would be, for example, parasitism and if beneficial to both sides, mutualism.  

The problem in putting predation into the completion category in that sense is that one could argue that predation benefits the predator (although there are risks in predation, sometimes the prey can kill the predator). One could argue that natural selection from predators improves the prey – mutualism?  It’s complicated.

It is of course possible for the types of symbiosis to change over time (e.g., from parasitism to predation). In heterosexual relationships, particularly marriage, the typical trajectory is that the relationship starts out as mutualism (both sides benefit) then transitions to commensalism (female benefits, male is neutral), and then ends up as parasitism (female benefits, male is harmed).  If the marriage ends up in divorce, female parasitism on the male can become extreme, even moving into predation. Note than even during the mutualism phase, the male can be considered as the extended phenotype of the female, with male behavior controlled through sexual exploitation. Also see this. The man is hormonally domesticated so as to be exploited by the woman in marriage.

Ultimately, the woman is to the man as the Jew is to the gentile.

What is observed in marriage can apply on a broader scale to relations between ethnies.

More Odds and Ends, 2/28/20

News.

Don’t worry!  There’s always Spring Break!  Have a productive vacation!

The Weinstein case can be summarized with the following analogy: A bunch of whores were dissatisfied with how much they were paid, so they successfully accused their “john” of rape.

Of course, some would argue that heterosexual marriage is itself legalized prostitution, in which the man gets a brief period of sex up front, and then pays for it the rest of his life. If milady is dissatisfied with payment, then there’s the pro-female divorce courts and alimony.

MGTOW!

The striking thing about the map here is the similarity between East Asia and sub-Saharan Africa. That similarity should not be in any way surprising, since larger breasts would be disadvantageous in hot and humid environments. Thus, since both East Asians and sub-Saharan Africans are TROPICAL peoples, they exhibit racially similar adaptions to an anti-arctic, tropical environment.

What about the fact that “African-American” females apparently have significantly larger breasts than do Black African females?

One can speculate this is due to:

1. Admixture with European stocks (particularly with Celto-Germanic British-derived peoples)

2. Sexual selection in a temperate environment in which natural selection against large breasts no longer holds

3. Obesity

Anxiety and neurosis? Can you imagine if a male Italian minister started crying at a news conference? The HBDers would be foaming at the mouth (and from other body parts) for months; we would never hear the end of it. But a Holy Oriental? Move on, move on, there’s nothing to see here.

Note lunatic feminist “Lexi” in the comments thread here, as well as Johnson’s hysteria about “burqas.”

Meanwhile, I’m getting more and more suspicious about this “Hampton.”

And 99% of Black women.  But, hey, don’t worry about the FACT that Americans are a bunch of landwhales (the 40% is only the obese; at least half of the other 60% are “merely” overweight, with a minority remainder being regular weight) and need to subsist on pills made by Asian frauds. Worry instead about the MYTH that “Big Pharma” is sodomizing “our babies” with vaccinations and “giving them autism.”

Grift alert!  Danger, danger…


Jack Vance expresses himself.


The alliance continues.


Amusing Taylor video. But isn’t “White advocate” a euphemism as well? Further, “White male” is perfectly acceptable for those whose character and behavior does not befit the word “man” – HBDers for example.


Do fries and a coke come with that nothingburger?  Meanwhile, I’ve been spending considerable money, time, and effort prepping. Thanks, China!  In theory, these are supplies that can be used anyway if nothing happens, so it’s not a complete waste of money; time and effort are another story. I would also advise readers who live with at least one other person to have one room in their apartment or home as a potential “sick room” that an afflicted person can stay in, to minimize viral load exposure to others in the same “household.”  It is unlikely that could completely prevent viral spread, but if you can delay it, you can reduce overlap between different individuals in the same “household” being ill, so one can help take care of the other or others before he or she becomes ill themselves (by which time the other person or persons would be recovered…or dead). Thanks, China!


This is China’s attitude toward humanity.


Some good news.  The Silkers weep.  What will “the border guards of the West” do?

Science Supports Sallis Once Again

And other news.

The science. Emphasis added:

Anthropomorphism in impressions of animals is commonplace, and this generalization from humans to animals is one example of a broader tendency to generalize from adaptively significant categories when judging specific exemplars. Although anthropomorphism may lead to unlikely or incorrect judgments, it fostered accurate sex-differentiation of macaque faces due to an appropriate generalization from the sexually dimorphic cues that distinguish human male and female faces to macaques. As predicted, Koreans performed better than Caucasians in sex-differentiating macaque faces, a difference mediated by Koreans’ greater use of sexually dimorphic eye height cues. These results extend and disambiguate evidence of East Asian superiority in sex-differentiating human faces. Whereas an own-race advantage might explain the previous but not the present findings, both can be explained by East Asians’ keener sensitivity to sexually dimorphic cues, perhaps owing to the greater subtlety of such cues in East Asian faces. Implications of this sensitivity for other cultural differences in person perception are discussed.

East Asians (except perhaps for Yukio Mishima) are better at distinguishing sexual dimorphism because they have to be.  Since they have so little sexual dimorphism of their own, East Asians have evolved to be able to discern the smallest of sex differences, so they can eventually find a mate and reproduce. Hence, I quote: “Koreans performed better than Caucasians in sex-differentiating…These results extend and disambiguate evidence of East Asian superiority in sex-differentiating human faces” and now the reason – “owing to the greater subtlety of such cues in East Asian faces.”  Subtlety indeed!  Then there’s the body.

Just wait until all the sniveling Millennials and Zoomers come back from the “Spring Break” (some going to Europe), back to the hallowed halls of academia, to the colleges and universities, the law schools, the graduate schools, the medical schools, and all the other bastions of “higher education.” Just wait until all those collected coronaviruses are unleashed on the American public. Expect academic campuses to be new epicenters of infection, spreading to the surrounding local communities. Have fun!

The original nothingburger:

MemeWarVet
The biggest takeaway from this whole to-do is that Chinese people eat bats. Otherwise it’s a big nothingburger.

Type I stupidity at its finest.

Nothingburger one. It’s spreading…coming soon to a town near you.

Nothingburger two.  CHINESE bioweapon?

Nothingburger three.  China fighting an undeclared war on the UK. How are all those “British Asians” doing these days, eh Silkers?

By the way, I’ve heard from various correspondents in different parts of the USA of some unusual military activity in their areas over the past week or so. Practice makes perfect, I suppose.  Have fun!  Meanwhile, have you noticed that mainstream articles on Yahoo have now been advocating prepping?  Fun, fun, fun!  Thanks, China!

 A wise comment:

UFO
Chinese people are really lunatics.
I’m not really one to judge other people’s cultures and beliefs but they just seem moronic. I’ve never seen such a dull intellect and curiosity. The nice thing about mass immigration is that we get to see the average Chinaman – not just the super genius ones which used to cause us to hold all of China in high regard.
I would completely cut off immigration from Asia. They are just too alien to us. Jews and Muslims, as well as Africans are far more understandable, to me at least. We don’t need any of them but Asians just creep me out, especially non-Muslim ones

Derbyshire weeps.

It’s just the common cold!

Battle of the Ladogans!  The epicanthic competition!  Dueling chopsticks!  German vs. Swede – what will Der Movement do?  The fetishists in anguish!  Oh the humanity!

This is Asia.  Very cognitive, very elite.

Why HBD makes you stupid, but also means you’ll conquer Der Movement.

Oriental poetry:

Me Chinese

Me make joke

Me give virus

So you croak

We’re all safe now!  Pray to Jaysus and we’ll be immune!  Hallelujah!

Milady ages gracefully. One needs some distractions after hitting the wall, eh? Sounds like a thirty year delayed reaction, though.

Yellow milady.

It would really be a loss for me if I let the pressure overtake my possibilities…

Certainly!  I mean, she’s about to cure cancer and discover the secrets of the cosmos, so we can’t let all that pressure interfere with those possibilities now, can we?

High trust northern hunter gatherers. Have no fear, Greta Ladogan will save you!

But, but, but…Joan of Arc?  Is Hampton “crazy and bitter?” The “paranoid style!”

How many Alt Right Whiteys have been invited to the White House to meet the “sincere man of genuine greatness?”

It’s greatness!

Are you noticing that the greasy inept afrowops are floundering around helplessly with the China Plague in Italy?  Hysterical gesticulating is not a plan.  And, no, there’s no truth to the rumor that Schettino will be Italy’s coronavirus czar – dagoes to the lifeboats!