Category: sex

It’s Der Female!

Evaluating agency and accomplishment (or the lack thereof).

Remember men, you shall not – repeat NOT! – objectify shy, retiring, and socially conservative milady.

Behold the female!  Behold!  Excerpts, emphasis added:

In 2014, blood-testing startup Theranos and its founder, Elizabeth Holmes, were on top of the world.

Back then, Theranos was a revolutionary idea thought up by a woman hailed as a genius who styled herself as a female Steve Jobs. Holmes was the world’s youngest female self-made billionaire, and Theranos was one of Silicon Valley’s unicorn startups, valued at an estimated $9 billion. 

But then it all came crashing down.

The shortcomings and inaccuracies of Theranos’s technology were exposed, along with the role Holmes played in covering it all up. Holmes was ousted as CEO and charged with “massive fraud,” and the company was forced to close its labs and testing centers, ultimately shuttering operations altogether. 

Now, Holmes faces up to 20 years in prison if convicted. In the meantime, as she awaits trial, she’s reportedly found the time to get engaged — and married — to a hotel heir named Billy Evans.

Holmes tried to invent her own time machine

That’s how she’s going to escape from prison. Beware the Morlocks! 

…She often played Monopoly…If Holmes was losing, she would often storm off. More than once, she ran directly through a screen on the door.

She quickly became a straight-A student, and even started her own business: she sold C++ compilers, a type of software that translates computer code, to Chinese schools.

Chinese….of course.

Inspired by her great-great-grandfather Christian Holmes, a surgeon, Holmes decided she wanted to go into medicine. But she discovered early on that she was terrified of needles. 

Those scary needles are sodomizing our babies and giving them autism!  

Holmes started raising money for Theranos from prominent investors like Oracle founder Larry Ellison and Tim Draper, the father of a childhood friend and the founder of prominent VC firm Draper Fisher Jurvetson. Theranos raised more than $700 million, and Draper has continued to defend Holmes.

Holmes took investors’ money on the condition that she wouldn’t have to reveal how Theranos’ technology worked. Plus, she would have final say over everything having to do with the company.

Holmes’ attitude toward secrecy and running a company was borrowed from a Silicon Valley hero of hers: former Apple CEO Steve Jobs. Holmes started dressing in black turtlenecks like Jobs…Even Holmes’s uncharacteristically deep voice may have been part of a carefully crafted image intended to help her fit in in the male-dominated business world. In ABC’s podcast on Holmes called “The Dropout,” former Theranos employees said the CEO sometimes “fell out of character,” particularly after drinking, and would speak in a higher voice.

Shortly after Holmes dropped out of Stanford at age 19, she began dating Theranos president and COO Sunny Balwani, who was 20 years her senior. The two met during Holmes’ third year in Stanford’s summer Mandarin program, the summer before she went to college. She was bullied by some of the other students, and Balwani had come to her aid.

Ah, Brown Knighting!  The Noble NEC!  

 Balwani became Holmes’ No. 2 at Theranos despite having little experience. 

Well, little experience with the actual work that is.

He was said to be a bully…

A South Asian?  A bully?  Say it ain’t so!

…and often tracked his employees’ whereabouts. Holmes and Balwani eventually broke up in spring 2016 when Holmes pushed him out of the company.

Brown meat lost its savory flavor?

Holmes hired bodyguards to drive her around in a black Audi sedan. Her nickname was “Eagle One.” 

Not “Tuna One?”

Around the same time, questions were being raised about Theranos’ technology. Ian Gibbons — chief scientist at Theranos and one of the company’s first hires — warned Holmes that the tests weren’t ready for the public to take, and that there were inaccuracies in the technology. Outside scientists began voicing their concerns about Theranos, too.

By August 2015, the FDA began investigating Theranos, and regulators from the government body that oversees laboratories found “major inaccuracies” in the testing Theranos was doing on patients.

By October 2015, Wall Street Journal reporter John Carreyrou published his investigation into Theranos’s struggles with its technology. Carreyrou’s reporting sparked the beginning of the company’s downward spiral.

Carreyrou found that Theranos’ blood-testing machine, named Edison, couldn’t give accurate results, so Theranos was running its samples through the same machines used by traditional blood-testing companies.

Thomas Edison spins in his grave (powered by Tesla’s AC current).

Holmes appeared on CNBC’s “Mad Money” shortly after the WSJ published its story to defend herself and Theranos. “This is what happens when you work to change things, and first they think you’re crazy, then they fight you, and then all of a sudden you change the world,” Holmes said.

 A heroic Joan of Arc, fighting all those Old White Men!

In July 2016, Holmes was banned from the lab-testing industry for two years. By October, Theranos had shut down its lab operations and wellness centers.

In March 2018, Theranos, Holmes, and Balwani were charged with “massive fraud” by the SEC. Holmes agreed to give up financial and voting control of the company, pay a $500,000 fine, and return 18.9 million shares of Theranos stock. She also isn’t allowed to be the director or officer of a publicly traded company for 10 years.

In Theranos’ final days, Holmes reportedly got a Siberian husky puppy named Balto that she brought into the office. However, the dog wasn’t potty trained, and would go to the bathroom inside the company’s office and during meetings.

Well, given the racial types she had in her company, maybe she was used to that?

In June 2018, Theranos announced that Holmes was stepping down as CEO. On the same day, the Department of Justice announced that a federal grand jury had charged Holmes, along with Balwani, with nine counts of wire fraud and two counts of conspiracy to commit wire fraud.

Theranos sent an email to shareholders in September 2018 announcing that the company was shutting down. Theranos reportedly said it planned to spend the next few months repaying creditors with its remaining resources.

Around the time Theranos’ time was coming to an end, Holmes made her first public appearance alongside William “Billy” Evans, a 27-year-old heir to a hospitality property management company in California. The two reportedly first met in 2017, and were seen together in 2018 at Burning Man, the art festival in the Nevada desert.

White Knight? 

Holmes is said to wear Evans’ MIT “signet ring” on a chain around her neck, and the couple reportedly posts photos “professing their love for each other” on a private Instagram account. Evans’ parents are reportedly “flabbergasted” at their son’s decision to marry Holmes.

Wise parents?

Besides the criminal case, Holmes is also involved in a number of civil lawsuits, including one in Arizona brought on by former Theranos patients over inaccurate blood tests. The lawyers representing her in the Arizona case said in late 2019 they hadn’t been paid over a year, and asked to be removed from Holmes’ legal team.

Joan of Arc, Joan of Arc, my Theranos implosion for a Joan of Arc!  

Speaking of Der Female, it seems like Birds of Prey is more or less tanking in the box office.  Be Woke, Go Broke.


Copernicus and Newton and all of you other totems of the patriarchy stand aside, we have real female science here!  Emphasis added:

The tweet was accompanied by a video shot from a woman’s point of view as she delicately stood a broom up and watched as it balanced itself.

“Oh my God!” she exclaims in the video. “No strings, nothing.”

Joan of Arc, Joan of Arc, my broom bristles for a Joan of Arc!


The XY chromosome set splits the atom, lands on the moon, uncovers the secrets of the genome and of the cosmos, invents the entire modern world with all of its technology; while the XX chromosome set exhibits the scientific prowess displayed here.  Well, we all do what we can, I suppose.

Der female, der female, der female marches on.

While I despise disclaimers, and usually trust to the intelligence and common sense of my readers, to forestall whining that EGI Notes is “anti-woman,” I’d point out that, obviously, the site is instead anti-feminist, anti-SJW, anti-White knighting, and criticizes everything and everyone. For every post about “der female” there are at least a dozen posts about pathetic “omega males” and their yellow fever obsessions with Asiatrices. So, stop whining, milady, and accept the facts of the case.

Odds and Ends, 2/12/2020

More issues.

Observation: Have you noticed how the attitude toward the US military and veterans has changed?  We went from saliva-spewing hatred and “baby killers” to groveling adulation and “thank you for your service.” You see, when the US military stopped fighting the enemies of America, and started fighting the enemies of Israel, then suddenly the projected attitudes from the mass media and pop culture changed and the lemmings changed with it.  

That’s great, Hood.  Why don’t you forward that to The Master of Disaster? Further, why don’t you admit that not only was your vaunted Alt Right wrong about Trump, it – and your whole affirmative action “movement” – wasted the last four years and accomplished absolutely nothing positive?

And what if your hero Trump wins in 2020?  What about 2024 and beyond?  It’s time for real world politics, as I have been calling for here, not just pathetic grifters who use the term “metapolitics” as an excuse to milk living expenses from their deluded cash cow followers.

Oh, yes, Hood, you admit the “movement” is not ready for the repression to come.  The problem, Gaslighting Greg, Jr., is that your writing makes it appear as if the “movement” is something that’s just popped up over the last few years, rather than being a fixture, in its current form. for more than a half-century, and well-funded enough to waste millions of dollars, and to have one hero earn more than $140,000 in a year to edit a blog and sit around on lawn chairs with a race-mixer.  $148,303 – worth every penny, no doubt!

I mean, how can you live with yourself, Hood?

This is HBD:

JohnEngelman  

I expect China to achieve world hegemony by the end of this century, if not sooner. I expect the United States to be dominated by a high IQ cognitive elite composed disproportionately of Jews and Orientals.

And the purpose of HBD is to achieve that objective as quickly and efficiently as possible. White enablers of HBD are traitors to their race and their treason will never be forgotten nor forgiven. Count on it.

Once again, absolutely classless, tasteless, and self-serving:

Remember Us in Your Will

Finally, we would like to broach a very delicate topic: your will. If you are planning your estate, please think about how you can continue helping the cause even after you are gone. The essay “Majority Estate Planning” contains many helpful suggestions.

Remember: those who fight for the Golden Age live in it today.

Thank you again for your loyal readership and generous support.

Greg Johnson

Editor-in-Chief

Counter-Currents Publishing, Ltd.

Hey!  “Trevor Lynch” needs to but some more movie tickets!  Why leave money to your loved ones who are left behind?  They are not going to usher you into the Golden Age!

As long as the Chinese murderers exist, of course this will be true.

Quite Right.  And in Der Movement, we have the HBD-ethnonationalist-Nordicist alliance, centered around sites like Unz, which has scum like Durocher and Johnson writing there.

The happiest nations will be ethnically homogeneous.

Hungary must be real unhappy and all what with the alien John Morgan living there.

Who is responsible for the Equifax hack?  Do you really have to ask? Don’t worry!  You might be dead from Chinese coronavirus before Chinese identity theft causes you any problems!  Hail HBD!

The monsters are killing American children.  When will the civilized nations of the Earth take action against The Land of Monsters?

Does the Counter-Currents crowd know this?

Her father came from Sardinia and her mother came from Sicily.

No, no, a thousand times no!  Forget about that ebony-skinned Black African and let’s have more posts about why we need more Greta Thunbergs. After all, Greta is of great benefit to all humanity!  Just ask Durocher.

Seriously though, if any of the readers of this blog from Italy have connections with Brothers of Italy, you need to make Meloni and other leaders aware of the work of Frank Salter.

Has The Master of Disaster moved on already from Sanders and is ready to support Bloomberg? 

It’s been quite a ride!

Princess Tulsi Coconut

King Andy Eggroll

Sir Bernie Redjew

The Honorable Mike Doomturd

How’s that affirmative action program working out for all you peanut gallery types out there?

Greg Johnson: Trump is a sincere man of genuine greatness.

Ted Sallis: Trump is a Negrophilic race cuck (I said that as far back as 2016, before the election)

Who’s right?  Do you really need to ask?

Johnson: Wrong, wrong, ALWAYS wrong.

 

Sallis: Right, right, ALWAYS right.

Laugh at this.

I was living in Eastern Europe…

He’s of Danish descent.  Counter-Currents: The home of ethnoimperialist hypocrites.

See this.

Given that hair length may well be the only external cue distinguishing Chinese “males” from “females,” one can imagine the social disruption that would ensue if the hair-shaving practice became widespread in order to stem the transmission of the disease. Without differential hair length, what are they going  to do?  Walking around topless certainly would be useless for sex-identification there. Genital examination may be useful – possibly – but that’s going too far for a casual interaction. Serious stuff there. Definitely not a “nothingburger.”  Particularly for the HBDers and the Silkers.  How are they going to choose their future mates and/or border guards of the West?

A Jewish Coup?

And other issues.

Read this.

Mostly true, but perhaps MacDonald should worry more about the Jewish-HBD coup to compromise Der Movement, effects of which are manifested in TOO itself.

I believe the present political crisis should be seen as a struggle between our new, Jewish-dominated elite, stemming from the 1880–1920 First Great Wave of immigration, and the traditional white Christian majority of America, significantly derived from pre-Revolutionary colonial stock but augmented by subsequent white Christian immigration.

According to Lind’s America’s Tribes hypothesis – a hypothesis supported by historical data – the “Yankee” fraction of the “significantly derived from pre-Revolutionary colonial stock” group is actually part of the “Yankee-black alliance” that is now the Yankee-Jew-Colored Alliance.

The history of US politics is little more than the history of these two coalitions: the southern-Catholic alliance and the Yankee-black alliance…the civil rights movement united Jews with blacks and their traditional allies, greater New England Protestants and Germanic Americans, against white southerners and northern white Catholics. Today, Jews are the most loyal white ethnic group in the northern coalition

An online comment about The Lords of HBD:

If you expect the truth from the Chinese government, then you are, respectfully, quite insane. And as for anyone seriously questioning the official pronouncements, a pipe dream at best.
My wife is Chinese, naturalized many years ago. Her oldest sister, who was raised in Communist China looked right at me once and said: The Tiananmen Square massacre never happened; because, the government said it never happened. They would not lie.
When I asked her about the press coverage, she calmly and clearly stated it was a fabrication of the western press meant only to embarrass the Chinese government. Really.

He’s a sincere man of genuine greatness!

The HBD view of an issue of significant relevance to the Alt Right is seen here. The “Gay Shaman Theory” must be very popular among a certain faction, a certain cabal, of the Alt Right. The Masters of the Mannerbund!  No wonder that the cabal is in love with HBD, especially with this fellow saying that having a “homosexual caste” is beneficial for a society.  Will Andrew Joyce critique Dutton on this?  If not, why not?  Why are the HBDers a sacrosanct caste within Der Movement?

In any case – the video is classic HBD.  Long on theory, short on data, and completely deficient of skepticism-inspired hypothesis testing. “Just so stories” are as essential to HBD as is Yellow Supremacism.

Odds and Ends, 1/24/20

Various issues.  In all cases, emphasis added.

Very cognitive, very elite.

Read this.

He is the intelligent man of action, the taciturn, unflappable Nordic explorer.

Yes, you know, like Magellan.  Note that Johnson originally wrote that for the Jew HBD Unz site.  Once again, the ethnonationalist-HBD-Nordicist alliance is on display.  Sallis: Always right.

Read this.

So if White Nationalists aren’t quite ready for politics, how do we prepare ourselves?

Assuming the conclusion. Nothing stops “White nationalists” getting involved right now in politics in a variety of ways – running for office in the right contexts, getting involved in the political campaigns of right-wing populists, etc.

We must identify the necessary conditions for becoming a political force. Then we must assemble those conditions, to the best of our ability. We must begin with things that we can do right now, and we must prepare ourselves to do harder things in the future.

Give dem “D’Nations.”  “Trevor Lynch” needs to go to the movies. Tickets are expensive.

Let’s begin with the obvious. If White Nationalism is going to be a political force, we need more White Nationalists.

That’s the type of sterling political analysis that justifies you guys funding Counter-Currents to the tune of $100,000 in the past year.

To change people’s minds, we need to know their minds. We need to understand the ideas and values of people who are already White Nationalists, and the ideas and values of people who might be converted to White Nationalism. Then we need to map out how to bring the latter into our camp. We also need to understand the ideas and values of our enemies, if we are to decrease their opposition to us. Armed with such knowledge, we could launch educational campaigns that would move us closer to our goals.

I’ve been saying for years that we need information, we need empiricism, and have advocated opinion polling and serious analysis to understand why people join, why others do not, and how we can retain the former and recruit the latter.  None of this is going to happen if large amounts of “D’Nations” money is being funneled to useless tragicomic Quota Queen affirmative action “leadership” losers.

One could argue, of course, that we have been doing a pretty good job without such knowledge. 

Only a grifting fraud would argue that.

Based simply on introspection and personal experience, a lot of us have become quite skilled at converting people. Furthermore, the rising traffic of various movement websites can be taken as testament to this success.

Absolute nonsense. Where are all these new recruits?  Does this “leader” actually “think” that “rising traffic” actually translates into actual followers?

But how much of this rising traffic is due to our outreach, and how much of it is due simply to the problems endemic to multiculturalism and globalization?

Most likely: Former – none, latter – all.  Let’s do the polling and find out.

How much is rising white ethnocentrism due to our persuasive pull, as opposed to the system’s dystopian push? 

Most likely: Former – none, latter – all.  Let’s do the polling and find out.

That is another question that we really need to answer if we are to become serious contenders for power.

How about opinion polling, instead of this?  It’s a zero sum game for the available money in Der Movement. Use it in a manner analogous to an intelligent investment, or waste it on “happy penguins.”  Your choice.

To do a serious study of the public mind, we need to create an institution, staff it with people with the necessary skills, and fund their studies.

To do such things, we need serious leadership, not a bunch of incompetent affirmative action grifters.

We also need some sort of institute to craft White Nationalist positions on public policy issues.

Hey!  I thought we had the NPI!  The Charles Martel Society!  What happened?

No matter what the outcome of the election..

Hey!  I thought that Greg thinks that “Trump is toast no matter what” and then the “race war” will kick in.

…we can emerge as the champions of the more than sixty million mostly white people who voted for Trump in 2016 and may show up again in 2020. Thus we should comport ourselves accordingly.

Thus: Scream “Kek!” while chugging gallons of milk.

It is fortunate that the 2020 election is a golden opportunity for presenting our ideas, since it is all we really can do at present. If we want our votes to matter someday, we need to start building the institutions necessary to turn truth into power.

Sure!  How to begin – dump the current “leadership” and elevate people to leadership based on their merit, ideas, abilities, and accomplishments, instead of them being of Anglo/Germanic/Scandinavian ancestry.

Yes, indeed, he is – a neurotic nitwit.

Marry Your Own Kind?

Lies and hypocrisy.

Here we see an article that perfectly reflects the HBD-Nordicist-ethnoimperialist alliance, an article that perfectly encapsulates HBD lies, pseudoscientific ignorance, and rank hypocrisy.  Excerpts, emphasis added:

We can marry whomever we want. Anti-miscegenation laws are gone, and social norms have been relaxed. “Empowered” women, sexual liberation, and lesbianism mean there are fewer white women available or desirable as wives. White men are looking elsewhere, especially to Asian women.

Especially for the Alt Right, eh?  Didn’t a representative of the Alt Right openly write online that dating Asian females was a “rite of passage” for the Alt Right?

There is a bitter backlash from white women who resent this, but nobody wants to marry a bitter woman. 

Misogyny! Womanizing gigolos like Greg Johnson and James O’ Meara, who preach to us about sexual mores, won’t like that.

The “manosphere” is full of complaints about white women, so why should a white man marry one? I was married for eight years to an Asian….

From a HBD perspective, you started on top.

…and for 25 years to a half Asian (three children)…

Thanks for producing mixed-race racial enemies, you scum.

…and am now ten years into a successful marriage (two kids) with a white woman. 

Serial monogamy – sounds real omnidominant to me.

Marrying your own kind — after choosing carefully — makes the most sense.

Choose carefully!  Third time’s the charm.

I have read widely on evolution. 

And learned nothing.

Survival of the fittest means differentiation and competition. The strategies that work best win out.

In Race, Evolution and Behavior Philippe Rushton applied r/K strategy to races. We evolved different reproductive strategies because we occupy different niches. Northeast Asians — fighting a harsh but predictable climate — became the most K selected. Africans, in a benign but unpredictable environment because of disease and predators, remained the most r selected.

Rushton was exposed as a fraud by his fellow HBDer Dutton.  But, hey, continue to push a discredited narrative.

Families reflect these differences. Asian “tiger moms” invest a great deal of effort in each child. 

Hardcore science.

Asian wives tend to feel obligated to feed their husbands, whether they like them or not…

After all, “Rosie” cooks meals for Derb and Jared “with her own hands” (as opposed to “her own feet”).

On the other hand, libido is weaker among the K-selected Asians. The newspapers carry stories of young Japanese and Chinese of both sexes who have no interest in sex. They are more likely to be faithful, but perhaps less likely to be satisfying partners. 

Is that because the “women” have the bodies of pre-pubescent boys and the “men” make Peewee Herman look like a Mr. Olympia winner?

Africans on average have measurably higher levels of sex hormones…

Lie.

…mature earlier, and tend to have higher sex drives compared to Asians, but they don’t feel the Asian sense of obligation to spouses and children.

Kevin MacDonald, writing in Individualism and the Western Liberal Tradition…

Time to bring in the HBD Nordicism.

…pushes the practice back further. He links it to the individualism of the hunter gatherers of preagricultural Europe. 

You forgot “high trust.”  Like Hubert Humphrey and Greta Thunberg,

Each individual rose on his own merits in the “Männerbund,” or brotherhood of men. 

Cue James O’Meara and Jack Donovan.

Dr. MacDonald proposes that monogamy was the standard in these societies. 

How about serial monogamy?

The upshot is that romantic love is a Western notion, and we white people evolved the mental equipment to make it work. We believe in love. 

Evidence?

The children of a mixed marriage are . . . mixed.

Thank you for that insight.

I had hoped my children would inherit their mother’s Asian work ethic and conscientiousness and my drive and curiosity. I was disappointed. Is this common? Anecdotally, I do not see as many successful mixed-race Asian Americans as one would expect.

That’s hardcore scientific empiricism right there!

Only one of my mixed-race children inherited the sense of romantic love I got from my parents. 

After all, “romantic love” is a strictly genetically deterministic behavioral trait, right?  Essentially, this individual is implying that his children are some sort of error.  What do they think about that?

There is unlikely to be a statistical study of the characteristics of Asian-Caucasian “mixers.” It is hard to imagine a more politically charged research thesis. Moreover, a rigorous statistical study would be very hard to construct. And there is the question of which Asians? Profs. Lynn and Vanhanen find that the average intelligence in Asian nations varies by as much as 20 points.

What HBD flim-flam would be complete without mention of The King of Pseudoscience, Tricky Dick Lynn?

Look in the right places. Find religion. 

Christianity – that makes no racial distinctions for marriage.

If you are a woman, you should attend American Renaissance conferences, where you will find many like-minded men. 

John Derbyshire?

You will find younger people in identitarian groups. Don’t just attend — take leadership roles. Learn to speak publicly. If a person’s first impression is looking up at you on a podium, he might continue looking up at you.

And engage in “measured groveling?”

You can expect the commenters on articles at American Renaissance to be on your wavelength. 

Tinfoil hat wavelength.

The logical choice for me was to look elsewhere. While there are substantial white populations in Uruguay, Argentina, Chile, and southern Brazil, the largest number by far are in Europe. Women in just about every less-developed or recently-developed country, whatever their race, are less affected by cultural disease than women in the United States and Western Europe. Moreover, an American income is also more attractive to them.

I consider the Visegrad countries — Poland, Hungary, the Czech Republic and Slovakia, and the Baltics to be recently developed. Although their standards of living approach those of Western Europe, the people remain traditional. I am continually encouraged by their resistance to the dictates from the European Union that they take immigrants. They are standing their ground, asserting that they are Christian countries and want to stay that way. The former members of the Soviet Union — Russia itself, Belarus, Moldova, Georgia, and Ukraine — might properly be considered underdeveloped. Average monthly salaries are less than $1,000. Though Western culture is making inroads, these peoples are still better marriage prospects.

And here we have the ethnoimperialism.  Eastern Europe is just a grab bag for racially superior Northwest European Inner Hajnal men to invade, live in, and engage in “mate poaching” (any complaints, Jeelvy?) in, taking the native woman.

Although most people think going abroad means American men looking for foreign brides, it works the other way. The men in these countries are more traditional. They tend to be more courtly, more inclined to observe the traditional courtesies such as opening doors. They can fix things. They expect to marry, the major constraint being whether they can afford it. At the same time, the characteristics now called “toxic masculinity” haven’t been beaten out of them. A white woman looking for a real man — with both the advantages and disadvantages — could do worse than Eastern Europe.

And, yes, obnoxious, overweight SJW Inner Hajnal women can invade Eastern Europe to find some hunkie dupe.  

But, hey, if we believe MacDonald’s latest flim-flam, and believe that every nuance of behavior is genetically determined, then what happens when you mix those Individualist Northwest European Inner Hajnal superiors with inferior collectivist Outer Hajnal Eastern Europeans?  Won’t you dilute all those “romantic love hunter gatherer” genes?

Further, if we should marry our own kind, and if you believe that Eastern Europeans are “the same kind” as Northwest Europeans, then what’s the justification for the sort of petty nationalist ethnonationalism that the Amren-Counter-Currents alliance promotes?  You can’t have it both ways. Complete hypocrisy all around. They’re different enough for petty nationalism, but when it comes to living in other people’s nations and taking natives for spouses, then they are “the same kind.”  These guys praise the Reed Johnson Act, but Eastern Europe is The Promised Land for Northwest European Manifest Destiny.  Hitler wanted to dispossess the Slavs; modern Hitler worshippers want to take Eastern European housing, spouses, etc.

And as regards the piece of trash who wrote the article, he spent his prime years in inter-racial marriage, producing mixed-race children, and then, in how old age, married a younger Eastern European woman, depriving some Eastern European man of a potential mate.

Yukio Mishima and Der Movement

It’s no surprise.

Is it any surprise that Der Movement is fascinated by Japanese author and right-wing ultranationalist Yukio Mishima?

Mishima has something to offer to many different factions of Der Movement. He was Japanese, so the HBDers love him. The Silkers not only like Mishima because of his racial background, but because Mishima’s work Kyoko’s House reflects the very essence of Silk Road White nationalism:

Schrader also incorporates scenes from Mishima’s book Kyoko’s House into the second chapter, in which the young Osamu (Kenji Sawada) sells his body to the loan shark Kiyomi (Reisen Lee) to save his mother’s restaurant from debt. Osamu becomes Kiyomi’s love slave at first, until their relationship turns into sadomasochism. “Your skin is so beautiful,” she tells Osamu after slicing his flesh, “I just had to cut it.” Their romance becomes one of pain and pleasure, beauty and destruction, a sense of purpose and existence through annihilation, culminating with Kiyomi preparing to bring Osamu to a blissful death.

One can imagine the White omega male Silkers fantasizing that they are a White Osamu and that some black-booted Chinese girl with a gun (a border guard of the West!) plays the role of Kiyomi.  After all, race-tinged sexual masochism is what Silk Road White nationalism is all about.

Speaking of the sexual angle, Mishima was a homosexual (albeit one who had a wife and children while still being more or less openly gay) – note that Mishima’s self-destructive tendencies are consistent with his homosexuality (a la Forney’s analysis of homosexuality) -and as a bodybuilder no doubt titillates the gay faction of the Alt Right.  

Of course, the Traditionalists admire Mishima for his ideology (Mishima being more racially acceptable, no doubt, than Evola), and the ethnoracial fetishists can have some sort of connection to Mishima since he can pass for David Bromstad’s (more White-looking) brother – or perhaps pass as Bjork’s father.

There’s something for everyone!  It’s all good!


Now, Mishima undoubtedly was an interesting person and one can have sympathy for his right-wing views and his Japanese ultra-nationalism,  But, I’m not Japanese, nor East Asian more generally, nor are all those Type I “traditionalists” foaming at the mouth over Mishima and his (over-rated) legacy. I don’t know – maybe if Der Movement concentrated more on Codreanu and less on Mishima, it might learn something.  But, alas, the lure of debasing themselves before the Altar of Asia is too much – the Japanese man must have priority.  I’ll note that it seems like Mishima fetishism in the “movement” rises and falls concomitantly with the interest in HBD; there’s probably a cause-and-effect relationship there.

Merry Christmas Heterosexuals

Der Movement for the holidays – and fisking about homosexuality.

Merry Christmas, suckers!  Keep on giving “D’Nations” – remember, those who give live in the Golden Age today!

But, but, but…Der Movement does good, it is fighting for the White race.

Keep on dreaming.

Remember…don’t objectify milady!  No, wait…(Putting aside that now, after pushing the idea that grossly obese landwhales are “curvy and sexy,” we now have sagging aging hags promoted as paragons of feminine beauty).  In any case, ”female” and “agency” in the same sentence is an automatic oxymoron, unless “agency” is preceded by “no” or “do not have.”

Get ready for the next Alt Right podcast  That’s right!

I would like to take a critical look at this essay, commenting on certain excerpts:

First, homosexuality is beside the point.

Then why does Counter-Currents focus on the subject so much?

Because of the distorting lens of the Jewish media, it is easy to think that all homosexuals are promoters of the Jewish agenda. 

Jew, Jew, Jew, Jewey, Jew, Jew.  Can we discuss the topic without knee-jerk Jew-baiting?

White Nationalism should be a one-issue political outlook. 

If so, then why must we discuss this topic?  Why does Counter-Currents “take a side” on this issue, not only with essays such as this, but with the essays (and books) by James O’Meara and Buttercup Dew?

White Nationalism is for the interests of whites and against the interests of our racial enemies. Period. Anything else is beside the point. 

The problem is that “the interests of whites” can be interpreted by different people in quite different ways. Moral, aesthetic, health-related, spiritual, etc. values can be viewed as important for such interests.

That means that White Nationalists must work to unite all whites into a self-conscious racial community, rallying around our common racial interests. 

All?

White Nationalism has only one message for homosexuals: white homosexuals have more important interests in common with other whites than they do with non-white homosexuals. We have to resist falling for any form of the divide and conquer strategy used by our enemies to destroy our solidarity as a prelude to destroying our race. Battles between gays and straights, men and women, pagans and Christians, Nordics and Mediterraneans, Celts and WASPs, Germans and Slavs, etc. have no place in the White Nationalist movement. These will always be used by our enemies to divide and subvert us.

What hypocrisy!  Let’s see: “We have to resist falling for any form of the divide and conquer strategy used by our enemies to destroy our solidarity as a prelude to destroying our race. Battles between…Nordics and Mediterraneans…have no place in the White Nationalist movement. These will always be used by our enemies to divide and subvert us.”

This coming from a site that has proudly featured the anti-“Mediterranean” ramblings of Andrew Hamilton and Ash Donaldson, that praises Humphrey Ireland, and promotes the HBD cult.  By the criterion of  “…have no place in the White Nationalist movement. These will always be used by our enemies to divide and subvert us” – then Counter-Currents has no place in the White nationalist movement, as it can be used by “our enemies to divide and subvert us.”

If Johnson has no problems with the aforementioned authors (as well as the likes of Colin Liddell [in the past] and John Morgan), then why not feature the writing of Andrew Joyce about homosexuality as well?

I have met a number of homosexuals in the contemporary White Nationalist movement, and I have my suspicions about a few others. 

Indeed. I have heard things about certain people as well.

All of these people, however, are intelligent and accomplished. 

Unlike those dumb, useless, and brutish heteros.

They are real assets to the movement. 

Really? The ones I know about or have heard about are, in my opinion, net negatives.

They are masculine, and appreciate masculine things like facts, logic, and forthright action.

Jack Donovan has described some of that “forthright action.”  Bite the pillow!

And even effeminate gay men can make a real contribution. Pim Fortuyn was ideologically a mixed-bag, but he had the potential to move the Netherlands significantly to the right, and his fruity persona only helped his cause. The media found it difficult to paint a flamboyant old fop who fussed over floral arrangements and doted over his lapdogs as the next Hitler.

What was tolerated in the socially liberal Netherlands would not be so well accepted elsewhere.  I believe most White Americans would be repulsed by a “flamboyant old fop.”

A unified White Nationalist movement does not require that all the different White Nationalist subgroups follow the same strategy. That would be counterproductive. The more different strategies pursued, the more chance that someone will hit on a winner. 

We’re still waiting for that winner to show up.

It does not require that all groups co-operate with one another either. It does not require that they like one another. It does not require that gays and straights share pup tents and take showers together. 

Brendan/Brandon is disappointed.

The minimum requirement for white unity is simply this: we all must focus our energies on pursuing our common goal by whatever path we choose, and we must resist wasting our time and energy on squabbles that divide us.

Again: Andrew Hamilton, Ash Donaldson, and Humphrey Ireland.  You hypocrite.

Second, intolerance of homosexuality is Jewish.

Insane. I suppose that’s why the Jews are constantly promoting homosexuality and why traditional Christianity, despised by the Jews, opposes homosexuality.

Westphal is apparently a Christian. If you ask Christians why they think homosexuality is a sin, they cannot point to any saying of Jesus. Jesus saw fit to condemn divorce but not sodomy. Christians have to turn to the Old Testament, to the record of the Jews and their wanderings, crimes, superstitions, and hatreds. There we find homosexuality condemned as a capital crime. Why? The whole aim of the Jewish law is to set Jews apart from the rest of humanity. The Jews condemned buggery because they and all their neighbors were engaging in it. Homosexual pederasty, which still remains a taboo in our culture, was widely practiced by the ancient Aryan peoples of the Mediterranean world. The Persians, Greeks, and Romans all practiced it, including some of the manliest men in history and legend, like Achilles and Alexander the Great.

So what?  First of all, I don’t care what Christians or Jews support or oppose.  I make up my own mind.  Second, what people did in the past is irrelevant. 

Technically, the Greeks and others were not pedophiles, who pursue children, for they focused their attention on young men who were well past puberty…

Like Pilleater?

But there is no question that homosexual behavior was not only tolerated by ancient Aryan peoples, it was considered normal, in some cases even ideal. It was ascribed to the gods (Zeus and Ganymede) and lauded by poets, philosophers, and historians. It is hard to maintain hateful Jewish attitudes toward homosexuality if one really understands and appreciates the greatness of classical pagan civilization.

Regardless of what is on the Old Testament, the Jews of today, who are relevant to us today, promote homosexuality.  And one does not have to “understand and appreciate the greatness of classical pagan civilization” by agreeing with, or appreciating, all facets of that civilization. Let’s see…they viewed Germans as barbarians, and celebrated the defeat, slaughter, and enslavement of those German barbarians. Does Der Movement appreciate that? I doubt that very much. Consider what Caesar did to the Gauls. Does Der Movement appreciate that? Should we tolerate treating today’s Celto-Germanic peoples in a similar fashion?

As poisonous as the Old Testament’s moral condemnation of homosexuality may be, it is based on a realistic conception of human nature. Judeo-Christianity condemns homosexuality as a sin. A sin is a matter of choice. And nobody is immune to sin. If a heterosexual is a person who is immune to homosexual attractions, then the Judeo-Christian viewpoint implies that there is no such thing as a heterosexual. If a homosexual is a person who cannot help but be attracted to people of the same sex and has no choice in the matter, then the Judeo-Christian viewpoint implies that there is no such thing as a homosexual either. There are just people, all of whom have the capacity to be tempted by homosexual attractions and to choose heterosexual attractions. Thus there is no room for moral self-righteousness.

Retarded sophistry. Who cares about the goddamned Old Testament?  We can condemn homosexuality on biological, aesthetic, and social grounds without invoking scripture.

Matters became worse in the late nineteenth century, when psychologists—some but not all of them Jews—created a new paradigm for understanding sexuality. There were no longer homosexual and heterosexual desires, which can be found in all people and can be controlled by our faculty of choice. There were now homosexual and heterosexual people, and what made a person one or the other was generally thought to lie outside of our choice and control. One’s sexual proclivities suddenly became a whole “lifestyle,” a whole “identity,” giving sex an inflated importance in the scheme of things. It was not long before Freud started speculating that the whole soul can be understood in terms of sexuality. This new and false conception of sexuality has caused immense suffering and damage to our race.

Jews!  Jews!  Excuse me…if it is all a matter of “our faculty of choice,” then why can we tell that someone is homosexual just by listening to their voice? Or in some cases by looking at their face?  Are we, in December 2019, denying a strong biological basis for sexual preferences?  And, if is “choice,” then can homosexuals please choose to be heterosexual, thus ending the problem?

First of all, it has created a great deal of anxiety for men and women who experience homosexual attractions at one time or another. In pagan societies, these desires could be acknowledged, understood, and even expressed if one chose to. In Judeo-Christian society, such desires were repressed, but their mere presence said nothing more about one’s identity than one is a sinner and subject to temptation—just like everybody else. Today, homosexual desires cause great anxiety and psychological anguish. People worry if they fall into a small and stigmatized sexual subspecies, totally different from the rest of humanity. A young man gets aroused wrestling with a friend and suddenly has a psychological crisis on his hands. He wonders if he is sick. He feels alienated from his family and peers. He wonders if he will have to move to the city and buy a feather boa.

Projection? Homosexuals seriously – very seriously – inflate instances of nominally heterosexual people experiencing “homosexual attractions.” Johnson should realize that many – I would say most, more likely the vast majority – of heterosexuals go through their lives without once experiencing such attractions. 

Second, this anxiety has chilled same-sex friendships and male bonding, and it is the bonded male group, the Männerbund, that is the foundation of all higher forms of civilization, particularly Aryan civilizations. It is amazing to read accounts of male friendships from earlier centuries, for example in Augustine’s Confessions or Montaigne’s Essays. It was possible for men to frankly express their love for one another without fearing the stigma of homosexuality, because that was an identity that simply did not exist before the late nineteenth century. (Today, these expressions of affection are read through the distorting lens of “queer theory,” and Augustine and Montaigne and countless other figures have been “outed.”)

I don’t know.  Maybe if young men can attend Alt Right meetings without being “flirted” with by homosexuals, then a “Mannerbund” could be possible.

Third, those who decide that they do not merely have homosexual desires, but are “homosexuals” are trapped by this self-concept into an exclusively homosexual lifestyle, which not only carries health risks…

This makes no sense.  Why would an “exclusively homosexual lifestyle” carry health risks while a “partially” homosexual lifestyle not?  The risks might be statistically higher in the former case, but still substantial in the latter. It’s not like there’s a threshold that needs to be reached before health risks occur. A single homosexual encounter can result in a life-changing infection or structural bodily damage.

…but also prevents them from affirming whatever heterosexual desires they might also have. It cuts them off from marriage and family life, which could be combined with homosexual relationships openly in pagan societies and on the sly in Judeo-Christian societies.

“On the sly.”  I’m sure the wives would be thrilled if they knew that their husbands are sleeping with men.  Get tested, milady!  Virus testing awaits!

Fourth, it has created the heterosexual, who thinks he is immune from same-sex attractions. 

Created?  CREATED!!!????  Excuse me, heterosexuals are not “created,” unless by “creation” you mean conception and birth. The idea of Johnson here apparently is that there aren’t any people who are innately purely heterosexual. They all have homosexual yearnings, don’t you know, perhaps satisfied by getting groped in a men’s room, or propositioned at an Alt Right meeting. Excuse me, but this is pure fantasy.  

This allows some heterosexuals to fuse Jewish intolerance with self-righteousness, turning them into queer-bashing bullies.

Is wishing to avoid interacting with homosexuals equate with being a “queer-bashing bully?”

All these destructive consequences could be alleviated if we freed our minds from the legacy of Jewish hatred and intolerance. 

Gaslighting nonsense.  Intolerance of homosexuality is not “Jewish.”  If anything, the opposite is true.

Queer-bashers are in the grip of Jewry without even knowing it. 

Oh, please.  This is just transparent pandering to Der Movement’s knee-jerk anti-Semitism. “If you dislike homosexuals, then you are secretly in thrall to the Jews.”  Nonsense.  The same “movement” tells us that “the Jews” control the media, have an outsized influence on popular culture, dictate social and political mores, and are over-represented in academia and the professions.  Yet, society moves steadily in the direction of the LGBTQ agenda.  What does that tell you?