Category: sex

Der Movement Dishonesty

Analysis.

Surprise: Pro-homosexual apologia in this discussion.  Who would have ever guessed?  Starting at 1:27:30.

Logical flaw: Just because negative attitudes about homosexuality derived from Judeo-Christianity doesn’t mean that those attitudes are wrong. That’s a fallacy, sort of like ad hominem; instead, everything needs to be judged on its own merits.  One has to evaluate homosexuality based on its effects on society, independent of what people thousands of years ago said or did.

The DNA ancestry result mentioned (1% North African for Greg Johnson): tells you something about the validity of low percentage “admixture.”  Anything less than 10% should be viewed with skepticism, less than 5% with extreme skepticism, and anything less than around 1% is ludicrous. If we assume that Johnson’s ancestry is (more or less) fully of founding stock ancestry, then where does this 1% come from?  It could reflect some sort of ancient influx (“just so” stories of North African soldiers of the Roman Empire stationed in Britain), OR it could be some sort of artifact. I believe that the latter is more likely than the former; however, this applies not only to the Johnsons of the world but to everyone else.  The DNA testing companies err on the side of false positives, Type I errors, which makes the tests more attractive to the naïve looking for the “Indian Princess” in their background, or others attracted to “unexpected and controversial results.”  And, of course, there are political motivations as well. But Johnson’s results could be real.  However, if they are real, explanations better than popular “just so” stories are required. In the end, it really doesn’t matter; absolute racial purity is a myth.

Johnson’s initial dismissal of the Hermansson infiltration as essentially a “joke” that did no real damage is dishonest. He keeps on harping on the fact that “no real damage was done” – disregarding my comments again and again that the problem is NOT what the outcome was, but what is says about “movement” “leadership’s” piss-poor judgment and its obsessive ethnic fetishism.  Johnson then basically admits after 1:39 that the essential problem was the fact of the infiltration itself rather than the outcome, so why try to dismiss it to begin with? Excuse: Johnson trusted Steadman and his “extreme vetting.”  Why would you trust a guy wearing shorts at meetings, who blows on Viking horns, and who is an obsessive Scando-fetishist?  This is an issue of judgment.

Greg Johnson: Thin-skinned?  No, more like papyrus-skinned.  The latest from his blog:

By the way, this will be your last comment here. I do not provide a platform for people to spit in my face by accusing me of bad faith.

Obsessive attacks against Richard Spencer are, on the other hand, of course welcomed.  Note conversation starting at 19:30 in the Luke Ford podcast.  Spencer, Spencer, it is always about Spencer. Note how Johnson says “everyone” used the term “Alt Right” and jumped on the bandwagon – no, Greg, Strom was skeptical and I was always hostile to the Alt Right.  Thus, once again, a completely dishonest narrative.

More dishonesty: Johnson keeps on talking about how the Alt Right was ruined by people wanting to “control the movement” while ignoring the more fundamental problem of the Alt Right wanting to control the entire racial activist “movement.”

Greg blames the drinking and street fighting on WN 1.0, while the TRUTH is that the WN 1.0 denounced all of that, while the Pepe-Kek cosplay WN 2.0 crowd was solidly behind it.  The entire Alt Right “realm of ideas” was Pepe, Kek, Beavis-and-Butthead sniggering, drinking, juvenile jackassery – and while Alt Right apologists were praising the “youth culture,” “old school” WN 1.0 folks were denouncing all of that.  And here comes Johnson, blaming the faults of WN 2.0 on the WN 1.0 that was actually denouncing it.  Outrageous dishonesty.  And who was saying “the Alt Right is White nationalism or nothing at all?’’  Amazing.  “Bad faith?”

And, hey, Greg, you’re not going to get a “mass movement” based on Pepe and Savitri Devi.

By the way: “Dr. Johnson” – he earned it!  How about Dr. Sallis?   Get over yourself already. 

If Johnson believes that talk of “false flags” is mostly stupid – and I agree – then is he going to denounce Roissy’s promotion of the false flag narrative?

And by the way, Greg, Tara and Lauren are far from being “Joan of Arc.”  To even imagine such a comparison is ludicrous.  Greg:

This movement is full of disgusting people.

Indeed.

However, with all of that, I do essentially agree with this analysis.  Although I assume Greg will blame that on “WN 1.0,”  even though it can be traced back to both the 2.0 folks and their “boomer” enablers.

Meet the ethnically disinterested Dienekes Pontikos.  No ethnic agenda there!

Advertisements

Sunday Follies

News.

First, I will note for the readership that [posting frequency will have to decrease somewhat here for the time being, due to me being busy with other aspects of life.  Hopefully, quality will be maintained.

Second, even though I am busy, I am slowly working on a genetics-related post that requires some data generation at me end, which in turn requires a lot of tedious formatting.  I don’t know how long that will take, but stay tuned.

Third, the gamesters are always good for descriptive paradigms about the sexual marketplace; this courtesy of Roissy (emphasis added):

Previous research has indicated that men generally rate slimmer women as more sexually attractive, consistent with the increased morbidity risks associated with even mild abdominal adiposity. To assess the association of women’s waist size with a more tangible measure of perceived sexual attractiveness (as well as reward value for both sexes), we examined the association of women’s age and waist circumference with an index of men’s erectile function (IIEF-5 scores), frequency of penile-vaginal intercourse (PVI), and sexual satisfaction in a representative sample of Czechs (699 men and 715 women) aged 35-65 years. Multivariate analyses indicated that better erectile function scores were independently associated with younger age of self and partner and women’s slimmer waist. PVI frequency was independently associated with women’s younger age and women’s slimmer waist. Sexual satisfaction was independently associated with men’s younger age and slimmer waist for both sexes. Better erectile function, greater PVI frequency, and greater sexual satisfaction were associated with women’s slimmer waist, independently of both sexes’ ages. Possible reasons for the waist effects were discussed, including women’s abdominal body fat decreasing their own desire through neurohormonal mechanisms and decreasing their partner’s desire through evolutionarily-related decreased sexual attractiveness.

Landwhales: flaccidators.

Attractive yeastbuckets: erectors

Science speaks.

Note at the end that Strom warns against Jewish-influenced “pro-White” groups, and mentions the “Alt Lite.”  Very well, Kevin, I agree with you on all of that.  But, pray tell, when will you critique the Alt Wrong?  You know to whom and what I refer, don’t you?  I suspect you may even read this blog from time to time.  Don’t you know of pro-Jewish “pro-White” groups and leaders?  Don’t you know about the dangers of the pro-Jewish and pro-Asian “HBD race realists?”  Don’t you know of entities where fast-talking Jews have promoted the idea of a multiracial “White separatist state?”  Don’t you know we’ve been advised to support “the racial status quo?”  Don’t you know we’re encouraged to admire – nay, inter-breed with! – Asians?  Any comments on that, Kevin?  We’re waiting.  Do your race a favor, make a distinction between genuine racial science and the HBD cult, and call out the Alt Wrong as the dangerous cul-de-sac that it is.

Behold the Female and Other News

Odds and ends.

Afrowop “game” – red font emphasis added:

After a Sopranos episode in which his character brutally beat a young stripper to death, during an interview he stated, “After the episode aired a lot more women started hitting on me. I thought it was very revealing.”

Indeed it was.  After all, women fall in love with serial killers; White women love abusive Negro males.  We’re supposed to take women seriously though, let them vote, and pontificate about “MeToo” and sexual harassment.  Why do men put up with it?  Because they think with their groins, rather than their heads – see next item.

But, before that – a comment.  All joking and ridicule aside, of course women can – in theory – play an important positive role in racial activism (albeit not in any position of leadership) as well as play important roles in society as a whole (also not in positions of leadership).  But in order for that to be even remotely acceptable, women need to speak out honestly about “the woman problem” – as exemplified by the bizarre behavior discussed by Pantoliano (and by any MGTOW or “game” website).  This behavior – just like the “love letters to serial killers” thing – is as bizarre to White men as is the behavior of the most savage Negro tribe in the heart of darkest Africa.  Yes, yes, the gamesters put forth a reasonable hypothesis – that females misread psychopathic male behavior as “alpha” and thus as sexually desirable – but that’s the problem you see.  If women are so unable to control their impulses that they behave in a bizarrely insane manner, what good are they other than for sex and reproduction?  The defense would be that psychopathic male behavior is for women what female beauty is for men, and so it is natural for women to love abusive male criminals and therefore nothing can (or should) be done about it.  If that’s true, then women are hopeless and have no place in any organized activity, no place near any lever of power, and no place near any decision-making authority whatsoever.

And, further, women never honestly address their sick behaviors – they “double down” on them.  “MeToo” is an example of this madness – the women who typically behave as Pantoliano describes are the same ones going on social media to decry some man who looked at a woman the “wrong way” 15,000 millennia ago.  The same women who decry “being objectified” pose on social media half naked.  So, no, until women reform, they will continue to get scorn and ridicule here. And since we know they will never reform, expect more references to “yeastbuckets” at EGI Notes.

To be fair, I have to say I agree with Derbyshire here. Even if the accusation against Kavanaugh is true, for goddssakes, who cares?  Some drunken sexual fumbling at a party during high school?  Is everyone insane?  What does it matter?  Where were all these tearful MeToo yeastbags during the Clinton Presidency?  And, oh, yes, if they’ve “wised up” since then, how come they don’t denounce him NOW, and protest his every public appearance?  Why don’t they turn on his “wife” for enabling his behavior?  Ah, no…because it is all politics, all play-acting.  And, no, men don’t need some fat Hawaiian gook telling us to “shut up.”  You shut up, filthy scum.

Having said all that, from my MGTOW perspective, I don’t approve of the behavior ascribed to the teen-aged Kavanaugh.  I’d like to see men – and here I include teen-aged boys – exhibit a bit more sexual self-control, a bit more restraint.  If the scenario played out as described, I see it as a victory for the female, especially as it never progressed more than a brief fervid fumbling groping.  Making males lose self-control, using their sexuality to control and manipulate men and boys, living amongst white-knighting betas and pussy-pedestalizing gamesters – these yeastbuckets have the world in their hands, and then engage in gaslighting crying about the “patriarchy” oppressing them.  Fact is, the ONLY power they have is via their sexuality, and they damn well know it, and use it.  Amused mastery is the response, not sweaty obsession and drunken groping.  If the action actually took place, I see Kavanaugh as the victim – he has to be publicly humiliated decades later because some girl – who Derbyshire rightly labels a bit “slutty” – triggered his sexual lusts.  No doubt she went to the party wanting to be lusted over.  No, she probably didn’t want to get pawed at (but who knows?), but what the hell was the purpose of that party to begin with, I wonder?  To discuss Cartesian philosophy?

Consider that Derbyshire is also correct that the Supreme Court has morphed into our National Legislature, and we can see the importance of all of this to EGI.  The composition of the court helps decide policy on issue of race and immigration and thus has a direct bearing on the genetic composition of the American population today and in the future.  That high school party decades ago directly affects the gene frequencies of America today, and for the years to come.

But, but, but…he’s the “God Emperor!”  It’s “4-D chess.”

Always remember…when the quota queens were gushing over Touchback Trump as “the last chance for White America” and as an “American Caesar who will solve the demographic problem,” EGI Notes was saying from the very beginning that Trump was a vulgar ignorant buffoon and a fraud, and that the only reason to support him was of the public perception of him, which was (and still is) promoting chaos and balkanization.  The man himself is the ultimate lazy do-nothing loser.  He’s rich?  His father’s money, his New York connections, and lots of bluster did the trick.  In Jew-dominated America, we must remember that wealth accumulation can occur via many mechanisms that have little to nothing to do with actual merit, achievement, or productivity.  Trump’s a cipher – a Big Mac-gobbling zero.  

Capitalism leads to racial degeneration and genocide.  Don’t get me wrong, a supply-and-demand free market economy is best – my socialism is political (like Yockey’s) rather than economic – but there’s no choice if one has to choose between a socialist Europe and a capitalist Eurafrica.  Communism with racial homogeneity is, literally, infinitely better form an EGI standpoint than genocidal capitalism.

Behold the Female, 2/21/18

Women: less self-awareness than a retarded slug.

Don’t forget: we should not objectify women!  After all, they are all chaste, discreet, and conservative, and how dare male brutes undress milady with their eyes!

“Using her body.”  Is there any other way?

Fresh from tearful courtroom testimony.  Don’t objectify milady (Jewlady) though, it’s uncouth!  Those pictures are art, high art, just like the Mona Lisa.  And don’t you forget it, you vulgar patriarchal bastards.  You Go Grrlll!

Behold the Female: What’s the Difference?

It’s all one.

Sex workers.  And now please tell me how that is different from ordinary female behavior – exchanging sexual favors in return for “goodies” from men (including beta male commitment).


If you think this is stated just for the misogynistic shock value, think again.  Consider: what is meant by a “trophy wife?”  A “Mrs Degree?”  A woman “looking for a good provider?”  The meaning of the fact that on dates typically men are expected to pay for everything, plan for everything.  In each case, what is milady providing in exchange for male resources?  Answer: sex or at least the promise of sex. It is essentially legalized prostitution.  The honorable behavior for women is motherhood (and, later, grandmotherhood) – family formation and nurturing.  The contribution to genetic continuity is worthwhile, but the typical cunning female exploitation of male sexual weakness is nothing more or less than glorified whoredom.


By the way, fresh from tearful courtroom speeches and #MeToo Activism, the female always returns to her roots: trade sexuality for attention and resources.  You Go Girl!  A rotifer has mores self-awareness than a typical woman.

Even a morally deficient cognitive weakling like Derbyshire notices the obvious:

My question: Nassar was doing the stuff he was doing for twenty-five years. How’d he get away with it for so long?
Part of the answer, I’m sure, is the same as the answer to the same question in the matter of show business sexual harassment. In both cases there was a thing that the harassees wanted very, very badly —so badly that they, or in the case of younger victims, more likely their parents—might have considered that submitting to harassment or molestation was a price worth paying for that thing.
In the showbiz cases the thing wanted was a movie part; in Nassar’s case, a shot at competing in the Olympics.
I don’t say that’s the whole story, and I certainly wouldn’t say that all the victims took that cynical view. Twenty-five years of silence needs explaining, though. I’ve no doubt that’s part of the explanation.

The media likes to concentrate on the isolated cases when complaints were made and were ignored, while blithely not mentioning the fact that many of the victims said nothing at the time, and are now being hailed as Tankgrrl Heroines for marching into court (after being emotionally soothed by a Labrador retriever wearing a tie) and browbeating the NEC pervert (or, simply, and non-redundantly, the NEC). Consider that powerful male celebrities are suffering auto da fe if accused of looking at a woman the wrong way back in the Ice Age.  So, if the entire woman’s Olympic gymnastics team, and their parents, had complained, nothing would have been done?  If all of “America’s darlings” had come forward publicly, together, nothing would have been done?  Yeah, sure.  If you believe that, I also have a bridge to sell you, spanning Manhattan to Brooklyn.


No, just like all the women who went to visit HuWhite Harvey, despite “it was known all over Hollywood what was going on”, and like all the women going to the office of Levantine Lauer (and his door-locking desk button) despite his own reputation, sometimes Tankgrrl ambition gets in the way of right thinking, eh ladies?  Or like those actresses who publicly decry being “objectified” and then post scantily-clad pictures of themselves on social media for all the world to see – a complete lack of self-awareness and adult-level agency.


A not-so-secret secret revealed to the women reading this blog: likely, most of the men you know and interact with on a regular basis have a well-disguised contempt for your sex, and it is justified.  When you act like children but demand to be treated as more-than-equals, supported by a hysterical SJW System, the contempt is well-earned.

Behold the Female: Expired Shelf Life

Rotting yeast.

My problems with the gamesters is essentially one of prescription, not description.  With respect to sexual matters, the game crowd are correct in their fundamental analysis.

For example, Johnny Redux:

A sexless marriage, in many (if not most) cases, is the result of a man marrying a woman his own age, and after time losing all sexual interest in her as she quickly morphs into an old woman before his eyes, much quicker than he is aging.

As they say: when a man gets older, he looks more and more like Sean Connery, and when a woman gets older she looks more and more like….Sean Connery.

Indeed, one wonders how much of the retroactive outrage pouring out from #MeToo past-their-prime yeastbuckets is due to the bitterness of aging, sagging hags, who have all the charm of rotting meat and all the grace of a wilted flower, looking back with desperate longing to the days when men actually found them attractive – before the inexorable ravages of time worked to make milady into a pathetic and pitiful shell of her former self.  Unlike Dorian Gray, it’s the woman herself, not her portrait, which decays with every passing day, to the dismay of every man who looks, disapprovingly, upon her.

Some good advice for (White) women: gain some humility, marry and have children in your 20s, suppress your urge to hypergamy, and cultivate a pleasant personality so you will be tolerable when your looks fade (which will occur sooner rather than later). You’ll want to have something to fall back upon when you hit the wall, other than the love of a good cat.

The connection between sexual behavior and EGI should be, I hope, obvious to the reader.  We are, after all, a sexually reproducing species.