Category: sex

Swallow Your Blackpill, 1/23/19

Let’s consider reality.

Watch this.

I haven’t said anything so far about the Covington Catholic School incident, but let me say this. This incident, coming so soon after the James Watson and Steve King fiascos, demonstrate very clearly that Whites are a pathetic, powerless, subaltern caste who are hated and despised by the entire System, and who have defenders, no supporters, no leaders.  Decade after decade the “movement” has preened and pontificated, churned through millions of dollars and through the lives of its supporters, and more recently championed the Presidency of a vulgar fraud (When is that Covington invite to the White House coming Donny?  Will you invite some of your Antifa friends there as well, to punch these innocent children?  Maybe little Jeff would like to do it?). The end result: Whites are more of a disenfranchised, humiliated, oppressed population now than ever before.  And the outrageously incompetent leaders have the nerve – shall we say the chutzpah – to debate among themselves “when our victory will be achieved.”  Are they really that delusional, or are they merely protecting their reputations and their cash flows?

And why don’t the Covington boys get a nice lawyer and sue all those celebrities openly calling for attacks on children, and sue Twitter for allowing it (and for maintaining all those “blue check marks”), while others are deplatformed simply for expressing legitimate political opinions?

Aren’t there any lawyers willing to take the case?  Or is that – the lack thereof – another indication of the “untouchable” status of Whites in American today? 

Hey, Greg, here’s some female “agency” for you.

And some more.

Daniels is the archetypal J Richards poster girl – blonde, man-jawed, big-boned, and floppy-breasted.  And of course, if you disagreed with Richards’ standards of female beauty, then you were “insane.”  That was during the rapid decline phase of Majority Rights, a phase that Counter-Currents is currently enjoying.

In any case, to me, Daniels has all the sex appeal of warmed-over roadkill, but Trump apparently was favorably impressed at one point in time.  There’s no accounting for taste, I suppose.

I was annoyed recently reading about crazed feminists accusing Gene Wolfe (of all people!) of being a “misogynist” who is “insensitive” to yeastbucket feelings because his female characters are “not well formed” and some of his male characters (Severian I suppose) sometimes treat milady with less than beta obsequious behavior.  This is the same Gene Wolfe who was devoted to his wife and who converted to Catholicism – becoming a devout practitioner of that religion – for his wife’s sake.  That’s the same Gene Wolfe whose books are actually full of interesting female characters.  But you can’t please SJW scum.  I also remember some retards accusing Wolfe of “anti-Asian racism” because they stupidly thought that the robot-like “Ascians” were “Asians,” while they clearly are the population of a far-future America. In The Book of the New Sun, the “Xanthic lands” are where Asia is or was – The Commonwealth is in South America; Ascia is in North America.  But I assume the SJWs would find the word “Xanthic” offensive as well.  After all, we can call Europeans “White” but we cannot call East Asians “Yellow.”

Talking about Wolfe always reminds me of my other favorite sci-fi writer, Jack Vance, whose healthy attitudes towards milady were described here, and also described here.

In addition, a young and attractive woman in Cugel’s Saga is described thus:

…gifted with a buxom chest and robust little haunches while still retaining a slender and flexible waist…

Cugel is “worse” than his literary “descendant” Severian in how he treats milady.  Although sometimes Cugel is insulted, tricked, and mistreated by cunning females, he also often gets back at them very well, including incidents of forced sex, which in The Eyes of the Overworld is given the euphemism “couching.”

I am of course not in any way condoning or supporting the behavior so depicted – of course the attitude of men toward women must be that of beta orbiter groveling, lickspittle admiration, and the idea that every slutty landwhale reeking of festering yeast is a potential Joan of Arc leading us to deliverance.  But, still, Vance is amusing, no?

And in contrast to “The Ring” and other Tolkien crap, Vance presents to us the “Pectoral Sky-break Spatterlight” that I definitely greatly prefer.  The former is a Type I literary artifact; the latter, Type II.

One less for Derbyshire.

Advertisements

Behold the Cancer, Behold the Female, Behold Der Movement

In all cases, emphasis added.

Before we get to the women, something to consider:

Each year, the American Cancer Society estimates the numbers of new cancer cases and deaths that will occur in the United States and compiles the most recent data on cancer incidence, mortality, and survival. Incidence data, available through 2015, were collected by the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program; the National Program of Cancer Registries; and the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries. Mortality data, available through 2016, were collected by the National Center for Health Statistics. In 2019, 1,762,450 new cancer cases and 606,880 cancer deaths are projected to occur in the United States. Over the past decade of data, the cancer incidence rate (2006-2015) was stable in women and declined by approximately 2% per year in men, whereas the cancer death rate (2007-2016) declined annually by 1.4% and 1.8%, respectively. The overall cancer death rate dropped continuously from 1991 to 2016 by a total of 27%, translating into approximately 2,629,200 fewer cancer deaths than would have been expected if death rates had remained at their peak. Although the racial gap in cancer mortality is slowly narrowing, socioeconomic inequalities are widening, with the most notable gaps for the most preventable cancers. For example, compared with the most affluent counties, mortality rates in the poorest counties were 2-fold higher for cervical cancer and 40% higher for male lung and liver cancers during 2012-2016. Some states are home to both the wealthiest and the poorest counties, suggesting the opportunity for more equitable dissemination of effective cancer prevention, early detection, and treatment strategies. A broader application of existing cancer control knowledge with an emphasis on disadvantaged groups would undoubtedly accelerate progress against cancer.

Note how health indicators mirror the sociopolitical-ethnoracial realities of America.  Given that America worships People of Color, and gives them every advantage over despairing, subaltern, low-caste Whites, it is not surprising that the “racial gap in cancer mortality” is decreasing, and that is occurring despite the poor lifestyle choices of Coloreds, including the observable fact that the typical Black female has a Googolplex BMI. On the other hand, “socioeconomic inequalities [in cancer] are widening.”  So, if socioeconomic inequalities are widening at the same time racial gaps are narrowing, this suggests the cancer burden is increasingly on middle-class, lower-middle class, and poorer Whites, likely from red states, and from the “poorest counties” in such states. This is all consistent with the Global Elite-Colored Alliance against Whites, manifested in cancer rates – the wealthy and the Coloreds doing better, and Whitey – squeezed between “socioeconomic inequalities” and Colored empowerment – doing worse. They are literally killing our race.

The only surprising thing from the social standpoint is the greater improvement in the situation for men compared to women – most likely explained by the inability of the System’s anti-male regime to compensate for the rampant obesity, promiscuity, etc. of women.  Note obesity is linked to many cancers, and some cancers are caused by sexually transmitted viruses.  Also, we need to have a racial breakdown of these sex differences. It may be that White women – despite all their faults – are doing better, but this is compensated by higher cancer rates and mortality among female Coloreds, for reasons stemming from lifestyle choices and genetic differences.

A Roissy commentator:

And the silly, age-old (lol) question that older women always ask me: “How can you be interested in young(er) women? What do you have in common?” I have to imagine that they are not totally clueless that men want younger women for their better/fresher looks, tighter skin/firmer bodies, more energy, generally better personalities, and (most important) their fertility.

As I have said here a few times, men should not, if possible, marry women their own age. That is what supports the boner-medicine industry. Most men can get erections, it is just that they cannot get them for their old wives or gfs, but aren’t black pilled enough (or feel to guilty) to recognize/acknowledge that truth. Older women simply have very little, to no, sexual capital. It has all been spent (in many cases, wasted away). Give these older men a younger woman and….BOINNNNNNG! Feminist society and the pharmaceutical industry instead want to blame the man for his failure to get/maintain an erection, instead of focusing on the object of his attempts. It’s bullshit. Men in their 20’s and thirties should date women 5-10 years younger than them. Men in their 40’s and above should date women at least 10 years younger than them. If marriage is in the forecast, the age difference should be 10 years. You’ll thank me for this advice, if you take it, when you are 40+, when your younger wife still gets you hard.

Finally, I have seen many older women who are beautiful, in their own way, when they have class and a sense of noble pride, but that should not be confused with sexual attraction to them.

One can speculate about female bitterness about “hitting the wall” explaining some of the crazed “extreme cat lady” SJW nuttiness of many older women (Warren being a perfect example).  We all have to suffer because they are being ignored by men?

This brings up another issue: Advice to younger White male readers here about marriage.  I am of two minds here.  On a collectivist level – what is good for the race – then family formation and reproduction is important, and, yes, get married.  From an individualist level – personal happiness and actualization – getting married (and all that comes after) will be by far the biggest life mistake you will ever make.  So, you need to make a choice: Race or Self.  If you value the former higher, then “take one for the team” and become another miserable man with a ring through his nose; if you value the latter, avoid marriage like the plague. For the latter men, if you are younger and can’t do without female companionship, then I suppose you can become a jackass gamester, a nihilistic sexual hedonist.  If you are made of sterner stuff – MGTOW – avoid the yeastbuckets completely.  Know thyself – and then make the correct life decision.  MGTOW – combined with men’s rights activism – is preferable to being a gamester jackass.

Compared to the rest of most of the Far Right, at least I’m being honest with you on this issue.  They’ll just tell you – “get married and have White children.”  You DO need to know the costs involved.  Balance benefits (of course the largest personal benefit is the massive fitness boost in your individual genetic continuity) and the costs.

In support of this, see some of the AOC quotes here.  Speaking of “the wall” as it pertains to females (is that what Trump has really been talking about all this time?), AOC has hit the wall (and hard) at age 29.  That may explain much as well.  The obvious connection to White interests and EGI requires us all to speak out on this issue.

In a normal society, aging women can distract themselves from their zeroing-out SMV by focusing on their grandchildren.  Note to older females – your unmarried daughter’s cats are not your grandchildren.

The yeastbuckets are well on their way to destroying the field of economics.  And I won’t even get into the whole hysterical co-ed vs. Trevor Bauer Twitter feud, except to state:

1. White and Jewish athletes were tweeting each other.

2. A young White female stuck her nose (or another body part) into the conversation, insulting the White athlete (of course).

3. The White athlete counter-attacked.

4. White female then publicly claims “harassment,” says her “last three days have been ruined,” gives newspaper interviews, and contacted his team in order to get him into trouble.

Lots of “agency” there, right Greg?  A new Joan of Arc, ready to lead the White race into battle? By the way, these white-knighting news stories always tend to omit that not only did she attack him first, but ALSO stated that he was like a “16 year old girl on her period” (projecting much?).  

Once again, John Morgan emerges as the voice of reason in the pathetic dumpster fire that Counter-Currents has become.  Where is Johnson digging up this new crop of writers?  Are they scraped off the side of a toilet bowel in a men’s room in Grand Central Station?  I won’t even mention Chad Crowley’s latest “effort.” My prediction that Counter-Currents will become the new Majority Rights is coming to pass.  

Hey, Roissy, dishonesty by omission is still dishonesty:

Hey, Jeff, you little pissant wall-eyed value-eating slave labor-loving wage-gutting nation-wrecking globohomo nerdo, was the tranny blowjob worth it? Asking for a friend named Donald Trump.

HAHAHAHAAAAAAAA

***

Some thoughts on the Bezos Bimbo.

News is out (thanks to Trump’s friends at the National Enquirer) that Bezos cheated on his wife of two decades and had an affair with a 49-year-old woman sporting staypuft lip injections. That’s her above, Lauren “dirty” Sanchez. She is the wife of a friend of the Bezos’. The timeline is murky, but the latest reporting suggests Bezos was slamming Slamchez while both were still married, but you know how these satanic cult elite marriages are arranged to allow for “managed indiscretions”.

There were questions if the Bezos marriage blew up because Jeffy or his wife stepped out, but now we know — the rich husband cashed in his inflating SMV. The cosmic order remains in balance, and we may enjoy the spectacle of TDS sufferer Bezos getting his name dragged through the mud.

Bezos has been looking jacked since Trump became President. It’s known that lifting will raise testosterone levels, and higher T will increase the risk of infidelity (jacked up muscles => jacked up libido). I wouldn’t be surprised if Bezos has more than one mistress in his closet that he acquired after he started throwing the iron.

It was Roissy (if I remember correctly, channeling the MPF crowd_ who publicly stated that Bezos will do a “hard right turn politically” now that he was “jacked.”  How’s that production turning out?  About as well as the lifelong liberal Democrat Jack Nicholson as a prospective political “alpha shitlord?”

Wrong, wrong, they’re always wrong.

Der Movement Dishonesty

Analysis.

Surprise: Pro-homosexual apologia in this discussion.  Who would have ever guessed?  Starting at 1:27:30.

Logical flaw: Just because negative attitudes about homosexuality derived from Judeo-Christianity doesn’t mean that those attitudes are wrong. That’s a fallacy, sort of like ad hominem; instead, everything needs to be judged on its own merits.  One has to evaluate homosexuality based on its effects on society, independent of what people thousands of years ago said or did.

The DNA ancestry result mentioned (1% North African for Greg Johnson): tells you something about the validity of low percentage “admixture.”  Anything less than 10% should be viewed with skepticism, less than 5% with extreme skepticism, and anything less than around 1% is ludicrous. If we assume that Johnson’s ancestry is (more or less) fully of founding stock ancestry, then where does this 1% come from?  It could reflect some sort of ancient influx (“just so” stories of North African soldiers of the Roman Empire stationed in Britain), OR it could be some sort of artifact. I believe that the latter is more likely than the former; however, this applies not only to the Johnsons of the world but to everyone else.  The DNA testing companies err on the side of false positives, Type I errors, which makes the tests more attractive to the naïve looking for the “Indian Princess” in their background, or others attracted to “unexpected and controversial results.”  And, of course, there are political motivations as well. But Johnson’s results could be real.  However, if they are real, explanations better than popular “just so” stories are required. In the end, it really doesn’t matter; absolute racial purity is a myth.

Johnson’s initial dismissal of the Hermansson infiltration as essentially a “joke” that did no real damage is dishonest. He keeps on harping on the fact that “no real damage was done” – disregarding my comments again and again that the problem is NOT what the outcome was, but what is says about “movement” “leadership’s” piss-poor judgment and its obsessive ethnic fetishism.  Johnson then basically admits after 1:39 that the essential problem was the fact of the infiltration itself rather than the outcome, so why try to dismiss it to begin with? Excuse: Johnson trusted Steadman and his “extreme vetting.”  Why would you trust a guy wearing shorts at meetings, who blows on Viking horns, and who is an obsessive Scando-fetishist?  This is an issue of judgment.

Greg Johnson: Thin-skinned?  No, more like papyrus-skinned.  The latest from his blog:

By the way, this will be your last comment here. I do not provide a platform for people to spit in my face by accusing me of bad faith.

Obsessive attacks against Richard Spencer are, on the other hand, of course welcomed.  Note conversation starting at 19:30 in the Luke Ford podcast.  Spencer, Spencer, it is always about Spencer. Note how Johnson says “everyone” used the term “Alt Right” and jumped on the bandwagon – no, Greg, Strom was skeptical and I was always hostile to the Alt Right.  Thus, once again, a completely dishonest narrative.

More dishonesty: Johnson keeps on talking about how the Alt Right was ruined by people wanting to “control the movement” while ignoring the more fundamental problem of the Alt Right wanting to control the entire racial activist “movement.”

Greg blames the drinking and street fighting on WN 1.0, while the TRUTH is that the WN 1.0 denounced all of that, while the Pepe-Kek cosplay WN 2.0 crowd was solidly behind it.  The entire Alt Right “realm of ideas” was Pepe, Kek, Beavis-and-Butthead sniggering, drinking, juvenile jackassery – and while Alt Right apologists were praising the “youth culture,” “old school” WN 1.0 folks were denouncing all of that.  And here comes Johnson, blaming the faults of WN 2.0 on the WN 1.0 that was actually denouncing it.  Outrageous dishonesty.  And who was saying “the Alt Right is White nationalism or nothing at all?’’  Amazing.  “Bad faith?”

And, hey, Greg, you’re not going to get a “mass movement” based on Pepe and Savitri Devi.

By the way: “Dr. Johnson” – he earned it!  How about Dr. Sallis?   Get over yourself already. 

If Johnson believes that talk of “false flags” is mostly stupid – and I agree – then is he going to denounce Roissy’s promotion of the false flag narrative?

And by the way, Greg, Tara and Lauren are far from being “Joan of Arc.”  To even imagine such a comparison is ludicrous.  Greg:

This movement is full of disgusting people.

Indeed.

However, with all of that, I do essentially agree with this analysis.  Although I assume Greg will blame that on “WN 1.0,”  even though it can be traced back to both the 2.0 folks and their “boomer” enablers.

Meet the ethnically disinterested Dienekes Pontikos.  No ethnic agenda there!

Sunday Follies

News.

First, I will note for the readership that [posting frequency will have to decrease somewhat here for the time being, due to me being busy with other aspects of life.  Hopefully, quality will be maintained.

Second, even though I am busy, I am slowly working on a genetics-related post that requires some data generation at me end, which in turn requires a lot of tedious formatting.  I don’t know how long that will take, but stay tuned.

Third, the gamesters are always good for descriptive paradigms about the sexual marketplace; this courtesy of Roissy (emphasis added):

Previous research has indicated that men generally rate slimmer women as more sexually attractive, consistent with the increased morbidity risks associated with even mild abdominal adiposity. To assess the association of women’s waist size with a more tangible measure of perceived sexual attractiveness (as well as reward value for both sexes), we examined the association of women’s age and waist circumference with an index of men’s erectile function (IIEF-5 scores), frequency of penile-vaginal intercourse (PVI), and sexual satisfaction in a representative sample of Czechs (699 men and 715 women) aged 35-65 years. Multivariate analyses indicated that better erectile function scores were independently associated with younger age of self and partner and women’s slimmer waist. PVI frequency was independently associated with women’s younger age and women’s slimmer waist. Sexual satisfaction was independently associated with men’s younger age and slimmer waist for both sexes. Better erectile function, greater PVI frequency, and greater sexual satisfaction were associated with women’s slimmer waist, independently of both sexes’ ages. Possible reasons for the waist effects were discussed, including women’s abdominal body fat decreasing their own desire through neurohormonal mechanisms and decreasing their partner’s desire through evolutionarily-related decreased sexual attractiveness.

Landwhales: flaccidators.

Attractive yeastbuckets: erectors

Science speaks.

Note at the end that Strom warns against Jewish-influenced “pro-White” groups, and mentions the “Alt Lite.”  Very well, Kevin, I agree with you on all of that.  But, pray tell, when will you critique the Alt Wrong?  You know to whom and what I refer, don’t you?  I suspect you may even read this blog from time to time.  Don’t you know of pro-Jewish “pro-White” groups and leaders?  Don’t you know about the dangers of the pro-Jewish and pro-Asian “HBD race realists?”  Don’t you know of entities where fast-talking Jews have promoted the idea of a multiracial “White separatist state?”  Don’t you know we’ve been advised to support “the racial status quo?”  Don’t you know we’re encouraged to admire – nay, inter-breed with! – Asians?  Any comments on that, Kevin?  We’re waiting.  Do your race a favor, make a distinction between genuine racial science and the HBD cult, and call out the Alt Wrong as the dangerous cul-de-sac that it is.

Behold the Female and Other News

Odds and ends.

Afrowop “game” – red font emphasis added:

After a Sopranos episode in which his character brutally beat a young stripper to death, during an interview he stated, “After the episode aired a lot more women started hitting on me. I thought it was very revealing.”

Indeed it was.  After all, women fall in love with serial killers; White women love abusive Negro males.  We’re supposed to take women seriously though, let them vote, and pontificate about “MeToo” and sexual harassment.  Why do men put up with it?  Because they think with their groins, rather than their heads – see next item.

But, before that – a comment.  All joking and ridicule aside, of course women can – in theory – play an important positive role in racial activism (albeit not in any position of leadership) as well as play important roles in society as a whole (also not in positions of leadership).  But in order for that to be even remotely acceptable, women need to speak out honestly about “the woman problem” – as exemplified by the bizarre behavior discussed by Pantoliano (and by any MGTOW or “game” website).  This behavior – just like the “love letters to serial killers” thing – is as bizarre to White men as is the behavior of the most savage Negro tribe in the heart of darkest Africa.  Yes, yes, the gamesters put forth a reasonable hypothesis – that females misread psychopathic male behavior as “alpha” and thus as sexually desirable – but that’s the problem you see.  If women are so unable to control their impulses that they behave in a bizarrely insane manner, what good are they other than for sex and reproduction?  The defense would be that psychopathic male behavior is for women what female beauty is for men, and so it is natural for women to love abusive male criminals and therefore nothing can (or should) be done about it.  If that’s true, then women are hopeless and have no place in any organized activity, no place near any lever of power, and no place near any decision-making authority whatsoever.

And, further, women never honestly address their sick behaviors – they “double down” on them.  “MeToo” is an example of this madness – the women who typically behave as Pantoliano describes are the same ones going on social media to decry some man who looked at a woman the “wrong way” 15,000 millennia ago.  The same women who decry “being objectified” pose on social media half naked.  So, no, until women reform, they will continue to get scorn and ridicule here. And since we know they will never reform, expect more references to “yeastbuckets” at EGI Notes.

To be fair, I have to say I agree with Derbyshire here. Even if the accusation against Kavanaugh is true, for goddssakes, who cares?  Some drunken sexual fumbling at a party during high school?  Is everyone insane?  What does it matter?  Where were all these tearful MeToo yeastbags during the Clinton Presidency?  And, oh, yes, if they’ve “wised up” since then, how come they don’t denounce him NOW, and protest his every public appearance?  Why don’t they turn on his “wife” for enabling his behavior?  Ah, no…because it is all politics, all play-acting.  And, no, men don’t need some fat Hawaiian gook telling us to “shut up.”  You shut up, filthy scum.

Having said all that, from my MGTOW perspective, I don’t approve of the behavior ascribed to the teen-aged Kavanaugh.  I’d like to see men – and here I include teen-aged boys – exhibit a bit more sexual self-control, a bit more restraint.  If the scenario played out as described, I see it as a victory for the female, especially as it never progressed more than a brief fervid fumbling groping.  Making males lose self-control, using their sexuality to control and manipulate men and boys, living amongst white-knighting betas and pussy-pedestalizing gamesters – these yeastbuckets have the world in their hands, and then engage in gaslighting crying about the “patriarchy” oppressing them.  Fact is, the ONLY power they have is via their sexuality, and they damn well know it, and use it.  Amused mastery is the response, not sweaty obsession and drunken groping.  If the action actually took place, I see Kavanaugh as the victim – he has to be publicly humiliated decades later because some girl – who Derbyshire rightly labels a bit “slutty” – triggered his sexual lusts.  No doubt she went to the party wanting to be lusted over.  No, she probably didn’t want to get pawed at (but who knows?), but what the hell was the purpose of that party to begin with, I wonder?  To discuss Cartesian philosophy?

Consider that Derbyshire is also correct that the Supreme Court has morphed into our National Legislature, and we can see the importance of all of this to EGI.  The composition of the court helps decide policy on issue of race and immigration and thus has a direct bearing on the genetic composition of the American population today and in the future.  That high school party decades ago directly affects the gene frequencies of America today, and for the years to come.

But, but, but…he’s the “God Emperor!”  It’s “4-D chess.”

Always remember…when the quota queens were gushing over Touchback Trump as “the last chance for White America” and as an “American Caesar who will solve the demographic problem,” EGI Notes was saying from the very beginning that Trump was a vulgar ignorant buffoon and a fraud, and that the only reason to support him was of the public perception of him, which was (and still is) promoting chaos and balkanization.  The man himself is the ultimate lazy do-nothing loser.  He’s rich?  His father’s money, his New York connections, and lots of bluster did the trick.  In Jew-dominated America, we must remember that wealth accumulation can occur via many mechanisms that have little to nothing to do with actual merit, achievement, or productivity.  Trump’s a cipher – a Big Mac-gobbling zero.  

Capitalism leads to racial degeneration and genocide.  Don’t get me wrong, a supply-and-demand free market economy is best – my socialism is political (like Yockey’s) rather than economic – but there’s no choice if one has to choose between a socialist Europe and a capitalist Eurafrica.  Communism with racial homogeneity is, literally, infinitely better form an EGI standpoint than genocidal capitalism.

Behold the Female, 2/21/18

Women: less self-awareness than a retarded slug.

Don’t forget: we should not objectify women!  After all, they are all chaste, discreet, and conservative, and how dare male brutes undress milady with their eyes!

“Using her body.”  Is there any other way?

Fresh from tearful courtroom testimony.  Don’t objectify milady (Jewlady) though, it’s uncouth!  Those pictures are art, high art, just like the Mona Lisa.  And don’t you forget it, you vulgar patriarchal bastards.  You Go Grrlll!