Category: solipsism

The Lathe of Heaven Syndrome, 3/31/16

More nonsense.

Courtesy of TOO:

Minor correction—-berbers were not white. Don’t look at cherry picked images of kabyle berbers online who represent .001% of the kabyle population. These pics were carefully selected and disseminated by Berber nationalists attempting to garner sympathy for their cause in western circles. lololololol! While they are not true negroids, most would pass as 1/2-1/4 black folks here in the states. Yes, even the Kabyle. I already addressed this issue in a lengthy comment in part 1.

In fact the brachycephalic, straight-haired Turks of 90 IQ are by an order of magnitude more white, given their closeness to Sicilians and Calabresi(who are off-white caucasoid populations). Greco-Armenian “turks are mongols!” propaganda would have you believe otherwise. 🙂

Any evidence to back up these assertions; that is, besides the decisive arguments of “lololololol!” and ” :-)?”
The solipsist “movement” marches onward…right off the cliff.


Why Do Jews Look The Way The Do?

A hypothesis.
I have been seeing some “far-right” sites discussing the issue of Jewish physical appearance, and I remember one site having its members put up a rather extensive gallery of pictures of repulsive Jewish celebrities, which quite literally made me physically nauseous.  These sites usually discuss theories for the stereotypical physical appearance of (Ashkenazi) Jews, often invoking the “inbreeding” argument (see below).  Although I am really not interested in these HBD-style discussions, the trauma inflicted by viewing some of those faces has led me to propose my own ideas on this subject.
Two points.  First, this is not meant as any type of criticism or insult toward Jews.  It is instead a relatively dispassionate discussion of a very real phenomenon.  Most people, including I believe most Jews, understand that this is a group known for brains not beauty.  Of course, there are always exceptions; in biological phenomena, outliers always exist.  The existence of these exceptions by no means invalidates the reality that the typical Ashkenazi Jewish phenotype is very well represented by the likes of Anthony Weiner and Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
Second, this is a hypothesis, not a dogmatic insistence of reality.  Unlike the “movement” and HBD, I do not have The Lathe of Heaven Syndrome, there is no solipsism here.  Therefore, I do not cite data but merely provide ideas that constitute a hypothesis that requires more empirical testing.
I’m not going to bring up “Jewish inbreeding” as a mechanism for their physical defects, for the simple reason that some HBDers (e.g., Cochran) have been making a big song-and-dance about how the whole bottleneck/inbreeding thing for Jews is not true; I haven’t really looked at the data since I am not very interested.  I can make my arguments without invoking inbreeding and will therefore go ahead and do so.
Instead, here I assert that two major mechanisms account for the typically repulsive physical appearance of (Ashkenazi) Jews: their particular ancestral origins in the modern Middle/Near East coupled to admixture, and the lack of subsequent sexual selection for improved (mostly female) appearance.
Ashkenazi Jews are thought to have originated in the modern Middle/Near East in historical times, followed by entry into Europe and a significant initial degree of admixture with native Europeans (the paradigm is Middle Eastern males with European females; the Europeans initially were likely mostly Southern Europeans, with, later, Germanics and Slavs entering the picture as Jews infiltrated to the north and east).  The Middle Eastern origin of Jews is well revealed by the phenotypes of Jews such as Weiner, which betray (the nose! the nose!) the Near Eastern-Semitic-Araboid antecedents.  Many stereotypical Jewish physical traits, particularly facial traits, likely have their origin in this derivation from NEC Middle Eastern population streams.  However, that is not the full story.  After all, despite similarities, there are differences in appearance between Jews and Arabs; furthermore, the distinctive Ashkenazi appearance has more to do with an overall disharmonious, discordant, off-putting “affect” than it does with any grouping of single features (e.g., noses).  Therefore, it is not only the Middle Eastern origin that is the mechanism here, but the subsequent hybridization with European stocks, which led to a discordant mismatch of NEC and European features, a disharmonious combination of features that fit poorly together.  Even further, one can speculate that this combination never stabilized into a harmonious blend because of a lack of sexual selection for physical appearance, which is the subject of the next part of this analysis.
Many (most?) human groups have undergone some degree of sexual selection for physical appearance.  In many (Eurasian) groups, this is most directed at the female, but of course male appearance is also affected through inheritance of maternal traits.  Some HBDers (e.g., Frost) assert that this mechanism was most highly developed in the northern climes of Europe during the hunter-gatherer times (cue “movement” heavy breathing at the mention of hunter-gatherers), and this is likely true.  In any case, sexual selection for appearance occurred throughout Europe and in many areas of Asia as well.  It may well have also occurred in Negro Africa, but there focusing on male appearance (I do not speculate on Amerinds, but possibly they too partook in this mechanism, for which sex predominantly I do not know).
Jews, however, I see as different.  For them, sexual selection was about intelligence, ability, family connections, business or intellectual success.  A physically grotesque Jewess may very well have found eager marriage partners if she was the daughter of a successful businessman, rabbinical scholar, or some other sort of community leader. Thus, she would pair up with an equally grotesque male Jew, from an equally successful family, and they would produce ugly yet intelligent children, with a greater probability of survival than the children (if any were produced) of less intelligent Jews (of whatever physical appearance). Thus, for Jews, there was no “gracilization” of physical appearance that could have attenuated the distortions and unpleasant features derived from their unique ancestral origins. The Weiner and Bader Ginsburg phenotypes were thus perpetuated, along with high verbal intelligence, high ethnocentrism and neurotic intensity, and other stereotypical Jewish traits.
To summarize: The hypothesis is that the stereotypical (Ashkenazi) Jewish appearance is due to their origins rooted in the modern Middle/Near East, coupled to discordant admixture with European stocks, creating phenotypes that never became aesthetically stabilized and gracilized due to a lack of sexual selection for beauty.

In the News, 3/22/16

More stupidity.

From a “game” site, but the usual “movement” stupidity:

I don’t know if it is obvious or unimportant but, I just thought I would add in that Kevin Williamson is mulatto.

Proof? Evidence? That’s EXACTLY the “movement” Lathe of Heaven mindset – the very thoughts of “movement” “activists” suddenly become reality. Even when they post on “game” sites as well. It all works the same! The solipsist “movement.”

Another moron:

And i didn’t have to give my DNA to some cultmarx biotech company, that just wants to help you (yeah.right) discover your heritage, to figure THAT out. I wonder (((who))) really owns those biotech companies anyway.

There are many things wrong with the DNA testing companies, but paranoid bullshit (other than Cobb and Watson, who likely have real cause for complaint) doesn’t cut it. The answer is better testing – WHICH FOCUSES ON GENETIC KINSHIP NOT ON OTHER (MORONIC “MOVEMENT”) METRICS – rather than relying on the “movement’s” “our thoughts equal reality” viewpoint.
Yeah, Belgium ban the Vlaams Blok – that has saved you. Now enjoy the vibrancy! A nation of cucks.
Trump is “playing a deep chess game,” eh, “movement” and game/HBD? Donald the mohel?

Answering an Incredible Stupid Bastard

Moron in italics, sanity in regular font.

December 9, 2014 – 1:05 pm |
Mari, I’m going to disagree with you on two counts: First, that it is possible for whites to stick together. 
Sounds like the Sailer argument.  More “movement” solipsism – it is because he says it is.
White, goyish liberals, as well as white Jews,
Jews are not “white.”
are our enemies, and always will be. 
Guess what. Christian conservatives are our enemy, too.
Further, whites from, say, Russia or Albania have little in common with, say, rednecks from the American South.
On a global basis, they have a lot in common. More locally, does it matter? How many Russians or Albanians are there in the American South? How many American “rednecks” are there in Russia or Albania?  What relevance then are the cultural differences? What stops cooperation and confederation and a sense of racial brotherhood that accepts difference? How about this: “Christian conservatives from the North have little in common with, say, redneck Christian conservatives from the American South.”  Is that not as valid? Ask Lincoln and Robert E. Lee.
This is Jared Taylor’s huge mistake. 
Of all things, this?
Taylor is a liberal who merely wants to replace a brotherhood of man with a brotherhood of whites. 
If by “whites” you mean Jews, East Asians, and NW Europeans, then yes. Otherwise, I don’t see it.
Both are liberal pipe dreams. 
Sort of similar to John Ray.  Just call something “liberal ” or “leftist” and it doesn’t matter if it’s a good idea or not.  Similarly, labelling something as “conservative” or “rightist” means it is A-OK.  The Republican Establishment needs to learn from this. All they need to do is label amnesty as “conservative” and immigration restriction as “liberal” and they have it made.
We need to be advocating for white Americans, or other white ethnic groups. They are hardly interchangeable because of genetic affinities.
What is this?  “White Americans” are of a large variety of ethnic groups and the “genetic affinities” among such “Americans” are as equally varied as comparing “Americans” to “Europeans.”  Unless, of course, this individual has a more narrow definition of “White American.”
I would further take issue that Christianity has played any part in our downfall. The West came to dominate the world under Christianity, and it’s hardly coincidence that the less Christian we become, the less strong we become. Our downfall can be summed up in one word: Liberalism.
Dat right!  Liberalism!  Those dastardly leftists!  That Christianity is by its very nature liberal escapes this moron. Fact is, Christianity was “Aryanized” and as long as the West had confidence in itself, and genuine spiritual belief in Christianity, that Middle Eastern poison had no major effect in hampering Faustian Western dynamism. But science and rationalism “killed” the Christian God, there’s no going back, and Christianity, bereft of an underpinning of supernatural Belief, has become secularized, and secular Christianity is just one small step from Bolshevism.
Christian conservative imbeciles like this moron, adding intra-White division to the mix, rank among our leading opponents, and should be treated as such. There will be no place for them in a future ethnostate, except perhaps in the trial dock or swinging from the gallows.

The Solipsism of the "Movement"

Another “movement” defect.

This post was inspired by this comment – an attempt by a commentator to inject facts into typical “movement” nonsense. That reminded me of my own endless attempts, in years past, to do the same, after which I became all too familiar with the solipsism of the “movement.” 
“Movement activists” believe that empiricism, evidence, facts are all unimportant.  Only their opinions matter; they behave as if they believe that their opinions shape reality, that their opinions are reality.  And, if not their own opinion, then some other opinion expressed by an anonymous online commentator, or by some “movement” author or “leader.”  Thus are “movement” dogmas born, from the fossilized solipsist memes generated from the ignorant and fevered “minds” of Nutzis and other assorted imbeciles.  Many in the “movement” have a “God Complex” – that they can create reality from mere thought, their Internet ramblings being a manifestation of their delusion of omnipotence.

These are people who don’t acknowledge an objective reality that exists outside of their own thoughts (or the thoughts of other nutcases – sort of a “group solipsism,” if you will).  They pretendthat they believe in an objective reality, but they really do not – the test being when they are confronted with evidence that goes against their fossilized memetic dogmas, and react by ignoring or decrying that evidence.

There are endless examples of this, exemplified by a certain self-satisfied, middle-aged, “1/4 Irish,” whey protein-chugging Manganite idiot and his 100% assured, confidently declared assertion that the majority of Italian-Americans are of NorthernItalian descent, a tragicomic whopper that stands as much to facts as an astronomer claiming that Mars has a greater diameter than Jupiter. We have all the sci-fi/fantasy texts that pass as “racial science,” all the endlessly repeated blog comments that regurgitate the same non-factual memes again and again; the Marxist “race realist” who responded to my posting of population genetics data that refuted his ideas with “I’m not going to look at your pictures;” the half-Jew hybrid inventing the most bizarre racial typologies and resorting to tantrums when anyone knocks over that house of cards; a cherry picking mestizo who accuses people of “sophistry” but who can’t specifically define what about the “sophist” arguments are “wrong;” the distortions and “just so” stories of the HBDers…all people who believe that reality is created by their opinions, that, like an omnipotent god, their thoughts manifest in the structure of reality.  Attempts to reason with such individuals are typically a waste of time, and if actual reality ever does intrude into their solipsist dreaming, the resulting cognitive dissonance results in them trying to alter actual reality – for example, vandalizing the Wikipedia pages of celebrities – to match their thoughts (rather than the other way around).

The “movement” justifiably attacks the Left for being unrealistic about issues of Race, Culture, and History.  Unfortunately, the “movement” is no better.  Perhaps the “movement” is actually moredelusional: I suspect that the Left knows that they are lying, but believe it is for a good (sic) cause; in contrast, the “movement” is unable to separate fact from fantasy, to them it is all one and the same.  More reason for the mentally deranged (American) racial nationalist “movement” to be destroyed and replaced by a sane, rational, and empirical alternative.