Category: South Asians

Sallis vs. Sailer on the Census

Sailer’s HBDite stupidity.

Those who read Sailer often see his “Flight from White” ramblings about the US Census.  Steverino is opposed to Middle Eastern North African (MENA) being a separate category from “White” – he wants the MENA folks lumped in with Euro-Americans.  He has also criticized the fact that South Asians have already been removed from the “White” category due to South Asian ethnic lobbying (similarly, the MENA crowd are actively lobbying for the same).  Sailer notes that these groups in the past wanted to be counted as “White,” but now that Whites are a subaltern “untouchable” group in today’s Jewish-Colored Supremacist America, the NECs want to flee as fast away from “White” as possible.”

However, the point has to be: what is best for America and more specifically what is best for Whites – Euro-Americans?  I do not remember Sailer ever clearly stating (at least at VDARE – I don’t care about the Unz site) why having NECs counted as White is something desirable.  Trying to parse Sailer’s “writings” I conclude that he believes that if MENAs and South Asians are “binned” as “White” then they will (be forced to) identify politically with Whites and White interests, reinforcing the power of the majority and its interests.  The fact that these groups were (South Asians) or are (MENAs) grouped with Whites and certainly reject any sort of “White” identity, political or otherwise, somehow escapes Sailer.  That the Jews have always been politically counted as “White” and have been the greatest enemy White Americans have ever had also escapes Sailer’s HBD brilliance.

Sailer confuses cause and effect.  He apparently believes that how people are categorized in the census affects how they consider themselves in a racial-social sense.  This is clearly not the case.  Instead, the reality is that how people consider themselves in the racial-social sense determines how they want to be categorized in the census.  There’s also crypsis involved: while Jews do not consider themselves “White” in the same sense Euro-Americans do, Jews also have an instinctive urge for crypsis, to want to hide their alieness, made easier for most Ashkenazi since the typical mind-benumbed White gentile cannot identify obvious Jews (but usually can identify gentile Middle Easterners, South Asians, etc.).  So, for the most part, Jews are content to be legally “White” despite not really considering themselves so; on the other hand, (non-Jewish) MENAs and South Asians have no desire for crypsis and for the most have part no chance of being successful at crypsis even if they were so inclined.

So, Sailer’s wrong-headed ramblings on this subject are his typical “look how clever I am posturing” in which he usually ends up looking like a pompous idiot (in other words, an HBDer).

There are real costs to Sailer’s agenda here, costs for Whites.  Binning MENAs (including Jews by the way) as “White,” never mind doing the same for South Asians, obfuscates, masks, and hides the degree of real demographic change, artificially inflates White numbers, and dampens down something that any White racialist (as opposed to an anti-White HBDer) wants to see occur: a strong White reaction against demographic displacement.  Here Sailer is on the same page as the System, as the Left, which wants to calm White fears, promote an “anyone can become White” storyline, and postpone White political reaction to race replacement reality.

We need to know the real demographic facts on the ground, no matter how harsh, instead of indulging in deadly fantasies that say that if a previously White town becomes transformed into a holding pen for Syrian refugees, then no demographic change has taken place.

Euro-Americans should have their own category.  Indeed, we should drill down even deeper.  Even with intra-White mating blurring ethnic boundaries, it would still be useful to know how many White Americans identify as various ethnic groups, etc.  Knowledge is good, as they say.  And contra Sailer, asking people if they identify as German-American is not going to lead to a revival of the Bund.  

Short summary: observe what it is that the HBDers recommend and support the opposite.

Advertisements

They Are Not Just Like Us

Silk Road follies.

Remember, GNXP says we must import hundreds of thousands of these cogelites per year!

Very cognitive, very elite.  Hail the bear!

Read here, emphasis added:

Women born in the U.S.A have by far larger breasts than women in any other country, while women born in Africa and Asia, particularly in the East Asian countries, have the smallest breast volumes.

A typical Caucasian woman born in the U.S.A. has a breast volume of 1 668 ml and the highest quartile of Caucasian U.S. women has a mean breast volume as high as 2 986 ml. In the Philippines, the mean breast volume is only 111 ml and even the highest quartile of Filipino women has a mean breast volume of only 179 ml.

a bra intended for the Asian markets can be made of inexpensive materials with using very light and simple structures. Virtually a bra for the Asian markets is to be considered more like an esthetic product…

I’m sure we are all shocked – shocked I say! – by these findings about East Asian females.

On a related note, note this news story and the accompanying photo. One could almost imagine the presentation being given topless and someone in the audience thinking: “who is this 12-year old boy talking to us and why is he in our classroom?”

Silk Road News, 5/2/18

More Asian hatred of Whites.
Here is a remarkable display of anti-White hatred by Asians, coupled to leftist cries of victimhood and other far-left rhetoric about “cultural appropriation” and an outrageous sense of racial entitlement (exactly what I mean by saying Asians are simply a more intelligent form of Negro).
So, if this girl needs the “permission” of Asians to wear that prom dress, then Asians need the permission of European-descended peoples to use, for example: electricity, computers, cars, planes, Western clothing, Western languages, printed books, microscopes and telescopes, Western law, modern science, antibiotics, in fact the entire modern world. Hey John Chinaman: MY culture is not your goddamned modern conveniences!

 

SLC News, 4/17/18

More rightist news and commentary.

A decent video.

One picture is worth a thousand words.

Read this nonsense.

Left to its own devices, science tends ever downward.

Hmmm. What tends ever upward?  I know…gnostic esoteric traditionalism and theosophical scifi/fantasy!

The pyramids of Atlantis were built with psychokinesis!  The Titans are Marching! Ostara!  Ostara!  Kali Yuga!  Guenon!  The men who can’t tell time!  The Age of Tungsten!  HBD!  French Army Surgeon!  The Spectral!  The Spectral! 

The anti-scientific bent of the Right was, is, and remains, an embarrassment.

Yes, science is a tool and is not “on anyone’s side.”  That said, the totality of the current evidence derived from science does in fact strongly support the general viewpoint of White racialism (which is not the same as the specific viewpoints of Der Movement, Inc.).

Why then isn’t science being effectively utilized to support the Far Right position?

1. The Right traditionally (no pun intended) has been hostile to science, derived from reactionary/religious/traditionalist tendencies tied to Rightist thought, tendencies that frown upon the ability of science to trash long-established myths and traditions; the Right hates the transgressive ability of science to cut through established, fossilized memes and get to the facts of the matter. The Right is a socially hostile environment for scientists and the science-minded in general; the Right has been, and continues to be, hostile to empiricism and scientific materialism.  The Far Right has always been more interested in theosophical nonsense, esoteric fantasies, and pseudoscience (e.g., of the HBD or ethnic fetishist varieties) than in genuine hard science.

2. When scientists do (rarely) speak the truth, they get subject to social pricing from the System; there is a reason why “Watsoned” is a verb (originally coined by me and not Sailer).

So, the Left has a monopoly on the scientific enterprise, which they twist for political purposes, while the Right is left gibbering in a corner about Atlantis, Kali Yuga, and Ancient Egypt as a “Nordic Desert Empire.”

Who on the Far Right has a “hard science” background?  Yes, there are academics, but I’m talking about the core STEM fields, at the level of, say, MD or PhD or MD/PhD. Today, insofar as I know, only the “crazy and bitter” Ted Sallis.  In the past, Pierce.  I did know of one STEM college professor in the 90s who was a NA member, and there are possibly some today, but no one I know of who is active, even under a pseudonym.  This absence of STEM in the Far Right is more of an indictment of the Right than it is of STEM.  A “movement” that takes seriously the likes of Jorjani and Kemp, and rants about “the pyramids of Atlantis,” cannot reasonably expect to be an attractive destination for the science-minded. And regards science, I’m talking the authentic variety, not HBD pseudoscience (most of which is peddled by “social science” types anyway).

Speaking of HBD pseudoscience.

The fruits of HBD.

But if Indians aren’t the right choice for merit-based immigration, then who—Chinese? A Chinese friend of mine who recently visited Taiwan told me that Taiwanese are increasingly siding with Mainland China because they want to be on the side of a country growing in wealth and power. This person said trying to talk to them about human rights, freedom, and democracy was like trying to upload a new brain to a robot.
This friend agreed that the combination of an ancient culture and new wealth tends to give both Indians and Chinese an arrogant feeling of superiority—that they have nothing to learn from Americans about individual freedom and democracy. They are here to make money. They don’t want to assimilate and become real Americans.

Never forget: when all is said and done, and one looks at the core consequences of ideas, then HBD is simply a political movement to advantage Asians (including Jews) over Whites.  It is Asian Supremacism.

Donate to the Happy Penguins because of…VennerIs this a new low in tin cup panhandling?

Laugh at this (by the way, more Sailer real estate posting).

What kind of name is “Zasloff?”  

What kind of idiot thinks that Whites – Whites with children at any rate – will “integrate” “vibrant” areas for $10,000?  How about some of these Jewboys show the way?

Movement Odds and Silker Ends

Points to note.

Read this important essay on the Chinese threat.

Riki on the Silkers (emphasis added):

You brought up an interesting and thought-provoking point in your comment, regarding the infiltration of the White nationalism/race realism as its new target. If that is true, which seems so at least tentatively according to the explanation you gave, this makes China all the more resemble the Jewry on the matter of internal infiltration and manipulation of the White resistance movement, something that proves my previously and repeatedly made claim on the similarity of China and Jewry, and merits our closest attention and fullest alarm. 

It is indeed ludicrous beyond belief that some people on the Right believe it’s a good thing to let the Chinese colonize and exercise control over the West to enforce border and order at gun point, which reminds of me the similar admiration of some White nationalist elements for the “strong”, “traditional” or “virile” character of the Islam or black nationalism, and hoping them to salvage the White western civilization. It is of course valuable to learn from the strengths of our adversaries, but desiring to be ruled by them is an unmistakable sign of inexorable weakness, fecklessness and cowardice and a sure recipe for ultimate failure and racial and civilization suicide as it is tantamount to giving up on our own identity and independence, rendering the whole idea of White nationalism and White racial survival utterly meaningless.

We don’t want or need immigration from India.

Another ethnonationalist fail.  Of course, Sen himself, and his involvement in “British nationalism,” is an indictment of ethnonationalism.  And the continued willingness of TOO to give hum a forum, even after the Giacomo Vallone revelations, tells you something as well.

Silk Road News: Misleading Asian IQ

More Asian stupidity.

While Negroes are uneven, I’ve found that I’ve always been professionally disappointed with Asians outside of a classroom environment – barring one exception.  By Asians, this means the whole of the Far East, from Korea down to Laos and Cambodia, though I’ve never really worked with Japanese. One colleague of mine who had lived for years in Asia insisted to me that Asians make a good impression for about two months and then they fall apart professionally.  Even after I knew this fact, I still once nearly got marooned in Newark, New Jersey on a business trip because an Asian I was stuck working with had run into [h]is two month use-by-date and absconded in a surprising, unprofessional way.

I know that Asian societies appear to be prosperous and “high IQ,” but historically they do tend to fall apart.  South Vietnam collapsed after the Americans left them to their own devices very quickly 1975.  China has gone from order to anarchy several times in the 20th Century and there was a severe famine in 1961.  North Korea is Korean culture without the Americans. Cambodia is a wreck.

Censoring Winne-the-Pooh Is over-inflated Asian self-esteem their “Achilles heel?”

Mind-numbing hatred of Asians toward Whites – why should academia be any different?\


Asians displacing Whites – Silkers celebrate.  All according to plan!


More stereotypes proved correct: the anti-White Asian and the ugly, mannish lesbian.


Another law-abiding Asian cogelite.

Silk Road News: Chinese Nationalist Liar

More Silker fun.


Note how the “Chinese nationalist maiden” leaves out the “maiden” part when commenting at Counter-Currents What is it?  My assertions that these Asiatrixes are using White male yellow fever fetishes to leverage for Asian power in the West hitting too close to home?


Get these lies:

Chinese diaspora people have no meddled with the politics of their host nations, but they did acquire power for their own safety. Power is a necessity. Purity is the fundament on which to build, power is the structure that you build. Power can turn into a beautifil structure. You can build a nice and safe house for yourself. Who doesn’t want that? Who doesn’t want power? I have studied many diaspora communities and they all have a desire for power. Jews want to use that power to destroy others. Chinese use that power to keep themselves safe.


Right.  Anyone familiar with the perfidious and Jew-like behavior of the Chinese diaspora in America, Canada, Australia, Malaysia (!!!), the Philippines, and elsewhere (rioting in France) know that this cunning Chinatrix is lying through her crooked teeth. And why should there be any “Chinese diaspora” in Western nations?  OUT, OUT, OUT!

And it’s another law-abiding Asian cogelite!

Remember, GNXP said we need “hundreds of thousands” more of such people arriving each year!

HBD, HBD, HBD marches on!

Of course Asians are “waging war” on the White man…they hate us!  “I’m the enemy, silly”…the write to you on your own blogs.

Since the Silkers say we should support the police in all they do, by all means, support them here.