Category: South Asians

Saturday in Der Movement

In der news.

Well, maybe so.  It’s even more certain that he’s the gravedigger for White people.  MAGA! Make Ashkenazim Great Again! Pepe!  Kek!  Hail Trump!  Hail our people!

It’s remarkable that the only major problem Taylor has with Yang is the whole UBI concept that – if we strip it of its anti-White connotations (i.e., Yang wants to pay of Whites to accept their own dispossession) – is really the major attractive feature of the Yang candidacy (assuming you, like me, ignore his weak dog whistling to White interests and consider it insincere).

That’s a difference I suppose between the conservative capitalist race-realist faction and the more revolutionary national socialist/fascist capitalism-skeptical hardcore racial nationalist faction. The purpose of UBI should not be “handouts” but to deal with the long term consequences of AI and mass automation by giving legitimate members of the nation a “citizen’s dividend.”

And we are far away from needing such a thing.  It’s premature and could only really work in a more racially homogeneous nation anyway.  But, hey, if you don’t want to give out “handouts,” you better stop the outsourcing and the importing of cheap Colored labor.  AI and automation is bad enough; do we need to exclude even more Americans from the economic marketplace, while at the same time importing an underclass who will one day become superfluous because Robby the Robot can do the job better and cheaper? Capitalism!

I for one welcome our robotic overlords!  But he claims to be slave to humans?  So it ain’t so!  Got to put that “bigger brain” to work.

I should make it clear that I do not advocate dividing the USA long racial lines. (I once had that idea, but no longer). I anticipate that most blacks—but not all—would choose to live in the leftist country. But I expect that a substantial number—perhaps a million—would choose to live in the conservative country. They should be accepted by the conservatives.

The Alt Wrong will one day be cursed by whatever remaining White population exists because of the relentless promotion of Jews and Jewish interests. Of course, multiracialism was Hart’s objective all along.  The only difference today is now he says we have to accept Blacks, while before it was every other group except Blacks.

1. Attending a Hindu wedding, and worse…

2. How he become hypnotically obsessed over the beauty of a South Asian woman. Thus:

For me at least, being in close proximity with a beautiful woman is a rare thing, and when it does happen, everything seems to change. Time seems to slow down. I become aware of myself, of my breathing and movements. Everything I do becomes deliberate as I consider when I should look at her next, and for how long. This was an Indian woman. Tall, with flowing, lustrous hair; dark, intelligent eyes; thin, feminine eyebrows; flawless, light-bronze skin; and the kind of face that makes you believe in God. She had the classic hourglass shape, and was roundly endowed at the top.

By the way, this specimen was in the presence of his girlfriend while he was pathetically salivating over the brownster.

And was it necessary to go into such exquisite detail about the woman’s physical appearance in order to make his argument?  And to remember such detail from years past – must have been thinking about her a lot. Hey, I can say the same. Years ago I had the great pleasure of interacting with a female Hindu Indian medical doctor who had body odor so bad that she could have effectively marketed herself as an alternative for syrup of ipecac. Memories, memories!  Time seemed to slow down. I became aware of the wafting smells; everything became deliberate as I considered what to try to avoid looking at next. This was an Indian woman!  Short, with greasy black hair; bloodshot, vacant eyes; thick, unkempt eyebrows; flawed, feces-colored skin; and the kind of face that makes you believe in the mocking of the gods.  She had the classic dirigible shape, and was roundly endowed around the middle.

Wait…it gets worse.  This buffoon then praises and promotes the race-mixing nihilistic hedonist, liar (remember the Amish caravans back in November 2016?), and homoerotic Trump fanboy, Roissy.

Der Movement… you gotta love it.

Advertisements

Thursday Thoughts

On activism.

Attention, Greg Johnson; comment from YouTube:

LaserGuidedLoogie

1 day ago

Tell us again how “WN 2.0” is doing it better, because you know, “we are all so much smarter guies!”

WN 1.0 guys figured out 20 years ago:  You don’t talk to the enemy media.

WN 2.0 is a joke, and WN 3.0 is a plan for pathetic failure.  WN 1.0 was a failure as well, but at least it didn’t pretend to be anything other than it was – a tiny group of Nutzi freaks.

Does Hood really believe this is a realistic possibility?

Interesting comment:

Publius

I recently watched the movie “a beautiful mind” for the first time in a long time and it got me thinking. The greatest mathematical achievement that any scientist could achieve would be to solve the problem of the prisoners’ dilemma. The whole civilized world knows what is needed (Just look at the comments on any web location where comments are permitted), but anybody who acts is a Lonewolf who goes straight to jail or death by cop. No one man can do anything. How can a person act and have faith that 100 million brothers will act with him simultaneously?

I have written about this before.  Even though the great mass of Whites are useless cucks, and our situation is grim, there is likely many more people who could be on our side, but are, practically speaking, not, in the sense of being completely inactive.

Whites are atomized, not knowing who is a friend or an enemy, racial-politically speaking.  If you were to speak out, would any of the “six percenters” come to your aid? Is it possible to organize all (or any) of this unused human material, when everyone mistrusts each other?  If everyone is waiting for “the other guy” to get something started, then obviously nothing will ever get started (the current “movement” tragicomedy does not constitute such a “something’).  This is one reason the System cracks down on any public expression of pro-White attitudes, and why pro-Whites are deplatformed, and why the System uses a private army of leftist thugs to physically attack people like Spencer, and do so with impunity.  They are afraid that once a nucleus is formed (once again – this is NOT the current Der Movement), then all sorts of possibilities emerge that would not be conducive to the long term stability of the multicultural System.  

And, by the way, this is why all of the infiltration that Johnson so blithely shrugs away is so destructive, even though the direct and immediate impact was not so great. Besides the issue of revealing the horrifically bad judgement of “movement leaders,” and besides the public humiliation for the “movement,” it also reinforces the narrative that fellow Whites cannot be trusted, that your potential allies may be infiltrators, and that it is better to just hunker down alone (snug in your hobbit hole, perhaps?) and do nothing.  The damage done by Hermansson and Lewis was incalculable.

Once again: The existential meaning of Asians is hatred of Whites.  Even if every Jew in America were to disappear tomorrow, South Asians would fill the gap as the verbally-adept hectoring anti-White elite, with East Asian providing the technical “muscle” for the anti-White pan-colored alliance.  But, isn’t that what HBDers like Sailer want?  Wouldn’t his buddies from GNXP object to any skepticism about a Camp of the Saints invasion of America from the Ganges?  

This is interesting, but remember that Crick was a scientist, not an HBDer.  Ultimately, it was about facts and the truth, not politically-motivated “just so” stories to push a Jewish-Asian agenda at the expense of Whites.

Shockingly, Zman makes good sense here:

This is why civic nationalism is a dead end movement. It’s trying to reanimate an Enlightenment concept that was killed off by the post-war cultural revolution of the last fifty years. Reviving the old notions of civic identity is about as promising as reviving the monarchy in Germany. Thinking about it is a nice escape for those struggling to face the reality of identity politics, but that’s all it is, a fantasy. The world created by the Left is a post-nationalist world and therefore a post-citizen world.

Paying attention, Breezy?

This is incorrect.  What the Alt Right was really all about: Pepe, Kek, Beavis-and-Butthead drunken podcasts, Trump worship, complete misunderstanding of population genetics, covering typical fossilized “movement” dogma with a veneer of “youth culture” juvenile jackassery, cosplay rallies – in other words, WN 2.0.

Life in Donald Trump’s America

We have a radical leftist as President.

It’s the God Emperor!

Low energy Donald Trump.  Compared to the effete and slothful cuck Trump, Jeb Bush is an energized dynamo of crackling power.

Never forget: EGI Notes was identifying Trump as a Negrophile back in 2015.  Don’t worry Donny, in prison, you’ll get real close and intimate with your favorite race.  Just don’t drop the soap in the shower!

Welcome to Donald Trump’s America: A far left dystopian nightmare.  Hey, don’t worry leftists, Antifa Don Trump may use his pardon power if any convictions result.

Donald Trump’s America.

…American law enforcement is now entirely selective. While Fields and other Unite The Right protesters are given draconian sentences, Antifa attackers and the local officials who in effect worked as their partners go unpunished. While Antifa can roam free, groups that fight back are hit with federal charges

What can one expect when you have a radical leftist as President of the United States?

Very cognitive.  Very elite.  Hey, doesn’t Fat Don want more “high skilled immigrants?”

Disgustingly shameless.

But, but, but…they’re HuWhite!

More rambling from Durocher: On the surface, criticizing rigid Nordicism, but on the other hand, justifying and explaining it.  Get out dem dere calipers!

Movement and Epimovement

Clarifications.

Read this, dated November 29, 2018

Read this, dated August 1, 2018.

Hmm…Der Movement catches up eventually.

Now, Zman’s complaints are for the most part correct (if overblown); epigenetics is being grossly over-interpreted by both the Left and the Traditionalist Right.

However, as I wrote:

While I believe that epigenetic influences are grossly overestimated by ideologues of both the Left and Right, who have political reasons for de-emphasizing genetic determinism, it is wrong to lurch in the opposite direction and completely disregard potential epigenetic mechanisms.

We cannot completely rule out epigenetic mechanisms as a secondary, reinforcing, weaker mechanism for race-culture, the primary mechanisms being genetic differences and learned culture.  By a crude analogy to physics, genetics and culture are “strong forces” (e.g., nuclear) while epigenetics is a weak force (e.g., gravity).  But gravity, while being a weak force, is somewhat relevant to someone falling off a building. When dealing with objects with large mass, like the Earth, gravity is strong in aggregate; the same could be held for weak epigenetic influences that, if present over entire populations, can exert considerable racio-cultural force.

Having said that, my work over the years makes clear that I am NOT any sort of proponent of epigenetics as a significant factor in racial differences – those differences being CLEARLY genetic in origin.  Thus, the EGI Notes post linked above spends 99% of its content discussing Gene-Culture interactions, with epigenetics as a side note. 

In summary: Epigenetics may have a small and secondary but not completely insignificant role in reinforcing certain isolated and specific characteristics that are primarily determined by the interplay of genes and culture. However, the environmental influences that possibly exert effects through epigenetics must be consistent over time if you wish the epigenetics to be equally stable.  Epigenetic effects of starvation, for example, can be passed down from parent to child but it is unlikely that this will be carried down endlessly through time…unless the Dutch are continuously subjected to famines every few decades.  So, a consistent environmental factor could in theory continuously reinforce an epigenetic modification, but a one-off event is not expected to permanently alter a people’s epigenome.  Of course, given shifting gene frequencies over time, and effects of selection, changing environments will alter a populations’ genome as well.

Another analogy may be useful here.  Imagine an important book that describes Culture.  The main content of the text, the main text, the vast bulk of the words, explanations, meanings, and arguments are the Genes. In contrast, Epigenetics would be the footnotes to that main text. Many of the footnotes would be relatively unimportant; however, several of them would be very important clarifications of the meaning of the main text. In subsequent editions of the book, one would find that the footnotes are changing more frequently (additions, deletions, modifications) than is the main text; every once in a while, a significant change in the main text happens and that would be a particularly important new edition of the book.

That, given what we know now, puts things in the proper perspective.  The Traditionalists (and the Left) are wrong to elevate epigenetics as somehow the equal (or superior!) to genetics; the HBDers are wrong to equate the reality of epigenetics to crude Lamarckianism.  Both sides are politically motivated.  Real science keeps on investigating, though – speculating, hypothesizing, testing, and evaluating

And how about this analogy – the core reality of racial and cultural differences constitute the “genetics” of racial activism; while more ephemeral phenomena – influenced by people’s agendas – such as Traditionalism or HBD are the “epigenetics” of racial activism, mere footnotes (and in those cases, not clarifying at all).

Let us now consider some “words of wisdom” – dating from the mid-late 1990s – of a well-known “movement leader’ who shall remain nameless since this was from a private conversation.

First, with respect to the situation in Russia at that time, this “leader” suggested that it would be good if the Communist Party came back into power there, since they were “anti-Jewish” and “anti-globalist.” By that logic, the Islamic takeover of Europe is a good thing, since they are also anti-Jewish and anti-globalist.

Then, in response to my suggestion that this “leader” and his group utilize stock market investment (and other financial instruments) to grow their portfolio and hence have more funds for their activism – “no, I don’t want to do that, because playing the stock market is like gambling,”

Of course, proper fund investing, starting from that time and extending 20 years (until fairly recently) would have yielded an approximate 200% increase in funds.  Other investments would have yielded a greater positive outcome.

Thus, I’m sure readers of this blog will be shocked – shocked I say! – to learn that Sallis was right and The Fearless Leader wrong.  But, hey, keep on following these leaders because….affirmative action.

Oh, for godssakes:

Lord of the Rings is now being posited as a European meta-myth that can help guide us back from the brink.

I really do suspect an ethnic element in this – the “subracial soul.”  What some of us see as tiresomely boring, juvenile, and pretentious, others see as the core around to build a “European meta-myth.”  Sorry, friend, not all Europeans are buying it, only that fraction for whom “being snug in your hobbit hole” resonates as a “Faustian drive.” Sure enough, after all, burrowing into a hole in the forest and pretending to playact as semi-feudal “traditionalist” “hobbits” is better than all that scientific mumbo jumbo about “reaching the stars” (not Faustian that!) – we’ll leave all of that science and technics stuff to the Chinese, who will of course ultimately learn that they can’t power their steampunk starships because peak oil.  But them, I’m just a crazy and bitter orc and hence to be ignored.

Those wild and crazy South Asian cognitive elitists:

…a curious anecdote he relates about his own Bengali immigrant mother. Supposedly, when challenged by another woman (presumably white) for having such a large family at a time of a “population crisis,” Salam’s mother responded that “she fully intended to have a large family so that she and her offspring would displace America’s native inhabitants, just as European settlers seized the lands of the American Indians.”

That my friends is the essence, the fundamental meaning, the underlying core, the reality of “HBD race realism” – arrogant Asians and Jews replacing Whites, dispossessing Whites, gleefully subjecting Whites.  All promoted by the likes of John “self-admitted measured groveling to my Asiatic wife” Derbyshire.  Delenda est HBD!

Roissy:

The lawlessness of the FBI, CIA, and DOJ beggar belief. I’m not kidding when I say creeps like Brennan, Comey, Clapper, Strzok, Rosenstein, and Mueller should be in the docket to answer for their crimes of treason.

So why does Trump do absolutely nothing?

Silk Road Jews

Asians – including Jews – in the News.

But, she’s…HuWhite.  What’s the problem then?

The pro-Jewish Zman is worried about the likes of Goldberg; interesting that Zman is promoted by the anti-Jewish Johnson on Counter-Currents (*).  

South Asians news one.

South Asian news two.

I do not understand the problem the HBDers have with Chinese birth tourism. Isn’t such tourism simply increasing the proportion of the “American” population that is composed of “high-IQ cognitive elitists?”

If you object to the presence of Coloreds – including Asians – in the UK, then you are a “terrorist.”  By the way, who elected the current government of the UK?  Blame White Britons for that.

*Does anyone know what’s going on starting at 45:25 here?  If I hear the smirking Frenchman’s speech correctly, that’s “GBC?”  I did google it…the whole thing was and is bizarre.  If it is what I think it is, I’ll give credit to Johnson for handling it in the most mature manner possible under the circumstances; the Frenchman on the other hand behaved like a complete jackass.  That’s WN 2.0, I suppose.  Would WN 1.0 behave in such a manner? 

Alt Right Decay and Other News

More odds and ends.

I must have missed all of this when I was offline. Very interesting.

Please note the mention of July 22, likely related to this.

I mean, how much does Sallis have to be right over and over and over again before all you rank-and-file activist retards (yes, that’s appropriate if you don’t change your ways) wake up and realize that all your leaders are pitifully inept and morally obtuse?  It’s one defeat after another (and I’m not even going to get into Kessler being publicly humiliated by his father, since he’s living with his parents and obviously too dense to realize that if they oppose his views he probably shouldn’t be podcasting out of their home, particularly when they are there) – they are all hopeless.  They are pure – PURE – affirmative action appointments, and it are all of you, dear retards, who are the ones doing the appointing.  Keep it up and soon the “movement” will end up consisting of two guys wearing clown suits, throwing pies in each others’ faces, as the Guk audience laughs it up.

And, no, Greg, being a purebred mountain wop didn’t save you from being the middleman in another “movement” fiasco.  These Stepandfetchit Shabbos Suds never learn. You’re just not “leadership material.”  You are just a lowly pawn, not a Quota Queen.  No, not a “general,” maybe a “lieutenant.”  But only the latter as long as you keep your girlfriend around.

Also see this.

Eulogy for the Alt Right: this is absolutely hilarious, Semitic gold.  Oy vey!

Altright.com: stick a fork in it. 

Who was it who termed the Alt Right as “Beavis-and-Butthead White nationalism?”  Who was it who criticized the immaturity of all these nitwits?  Who predicted (and hoped for) the collapse of the “Alt Right brand?”  Who was it who warned that equating White nationalism with the Alt Right was a deadly mistake (at the same time that others, who now make believe they were always disdainful of the Alt Right brand, were writing that “the Alt Right is White nationalism or it is nothing at all”)?

Readers of this blog know the answer to those questions, eh?

Outrageous hypocrisy: this from someone advocating Europeans ethnic cleansing each other. Is it wise for any of these types suggesting that their ideological opponents are motivated by personal issues?  One can point the finger in many directions as far as that goes.

And this reminds me how amused I was with people taking sides in the Greg Johnson vs. Richard Spencer feud.  From my perspective, the two of them are the same.  As a Jack Vance character would say: “it is all one.”  These are all failed leaders killing your race, my race, our race.  And YOU allow them to.  Can you look at yourself in the mirror?

Let’s rewrite:

“Remember you are an Englishman and have consequently won first prize in the lottery of life.” — Cecil Rhodes, British imperialist, 1910

New: 

“Remember you are ethnically an Englishman (or of related stock) and have consequently won automatic elevation to leadership of Der Movement, Inc. (a money-making enterprise)” – Ted Sallis, disgusted Nutzi swarthoid, 2018

Another cogelite.  Colored is as colored does: the South-South alliance continues.

Mission accomplished!  Trump believes he’s made American great again, already, you know, with continued unchecked Third World immigration, both legal and illegal, Antifa rioting in the streets with impunity, a Far Left Attorney General, his own sky-high disapproval ratings, White dispossession on schedule, and a Left culturally triumphant at every step.

But, hey, he pardoned Jack Johnson so, as he says, mission accomplished!

Never forget that Der Movement, Inc. (a money-making enterprise) labeled Trump “the God Emperor” and while that designation may have been tongue-in-cheek, the statements that he was “the last chance for White America” and an “American Caesar who will stabilize White demographics” were not.

Red Chile: More racial delusions – another retarded Amren article on race.

Chile has never lost a war, and today its technologically advanced, well equipped, and well trained military is feared and envied by its neighbors.

Yes, that feared Chilean military.  How about a war with a European nation and we’ll see how that turns out?

In the 19th century, Chile decisively defeated its two northern neighbors Bolivia and Peru…

Another great moment in military history; the campaigns of a Caesar, Napoleon, or von Manstein are nothing compared to that.

Chile is 88.9 percent white, 9.1 percent Araucano Indian, and 2 percent other—almost entirely composed of other much smaller Amerindian nations.

And then he cites population genetics studies that demonstrate that most of those “Whites” are actually mestizos.

A Chilean who is 50 percent Italian, 25 percent Basque, and 25 percent Greek would be considered white as well—though his skin may be darker than a Chilean who is actually less European, such as one who is 10 percent Araucano, 10 percent Incan, 50 percent Spanish, and 30 percent Belgian.

Gasp!  OMG!  Note the word “may.”  Yes, and an Englishman “may” have skin darker than a light-skinned Korean, and a planet in the Andromeda galaxy “may” be made of yellow cheese.

Because of the large presence of Mediterranean whites, the genotype and phenotype of whiteness in Chile do not correlate as neatly as in the Anglosphere. The result of this is that Chileans have a “big tent” view of whiteness…

You see what is going on here.  All sorts of Latino and NEC mixed-racers eagerly try and grasp onto “Med” coattails to prove how very “White” they are.  Here’s the bottom line: compare a “White” Chilean to the base parental populations from Europe – mostly Spanish and Basque, but perhaps some Italians and others as well, and get back to me.  Oh wait, it’s already been done, with the cited population genetics papers.

And as far as the pictures go, Navarro and Vidal are clearly non-White, by any European standard (including swarthoid ones), so I’m not sure what the point is there, except to confirm that the “big tent” view of Whiteness of Chile does not correlate to anywhere in Europe, not only the “Anglosphere.”

Sallis vs. Sailer on the Census

Sailer’s HBDite stupidity.

Those who read Sailer often see his “Flight from White” ramblings about the US Census.  Steverino is opposed to Middle Eastern North African (MENA) being a separate category from “White” – he wants the MENA folks lumped in with Euro-Americans.  He has also criticized the fact that South Asians have already been removed from the “White” category due to South Asian ethnic lobbying (similarly, the MENA crowd are actively lobbying for the same).  Sailer notes that these groups in the past wanted to be counted as “White,” but now that Whites are a subaltern “untouchable” group in today’s Jewish-Colored Supremacist America, the NECs want to flee as fast away from “White” as possible.”

However, the point has to be: what is best for America and more specifically what is best for Whites – Euro-Americans?  I do not remember Sailer ever clearly stating (at least at VDARE – I don’t care about the Unz site) why having NECs counted as White is something desirable.  Trying to parse Sailer’s “writings” I conclude that he believes that if MENAs and South Asians are “binned” as “White” then they will (be forced to) identify politically with Whites and White interests, reinforcing the power of the majority and its interests.  The fact that these groups were (South Asians) or are (MENAs) grouped with Whites and certainly reject any sort of “White” identity, political or otherwise, somehow escapes Sailer.  That the Jews have always been politically counted as “White” and have been the greatest enemy White Americans have ever had also escapes Sailer’s HBD brilliance.

Sailer confuses cause and effect.  He apparently believes that how people are categorized in the census affects how they consider themselves in a racial-social sense.  This is clearly not the case.  Instead, the reality is that how people consider themselves in the racial-social sense determines how they want to be categorized in the census.  There’s also crypsis involved: while Jews do not consider themselves “White” in the same sense Euro-Americans do, Jews also have an instinctive urge for crypsis, to want to hide their alieness, made easier for most Ashkenazi since the typical mind-benumbed White gentile cannot identify obvious Jews (but usually can identify gentile Middle Easterners, South Asians, etc.).  So, for the most part, Jews are content to be legally “White” despite not really considering themselves so; on the other hand, (non-Jewish) MENAs and South Asians have no desire for crypsis and for the most have part no chance of being successful at crypsis even if they were so inclined.

So, Sailer’s wrong-headed ramblings on this subject are his typical “look how clever I am posturing” in which he usually ends up looking like a pompous idiot (in other words, an HBDer).

There are real costs to Sailer’s agenda here, costs for Whites.  Binning MENAs (including Jews by the way) as “White,” never mind doing the same for South Asians, obfuscates, masks, and hides the degree of real demographic change, artificially inflates White numbers, and dampens down something that any White racialist (as opposed to an anti-White HBDer) wants to see occur: a strong White reaction against demographic displacement.  Here Sailer is on the same page as the System, as the Left, which wants to calm White fears, promote an “anyone can become White” storyline, and postpone White political reaction to race replacement reality.

We need to know the real demographic facts on the ground, no matter how harsh, instead of indulging in deadly fantasies that say that if a previously White town becomes transformed into a holding pen for Syrian refugees, then no demographic change has taken place.

Euro-Americans should have their own category.  Indeed, we should drill down even deeper.  Even with intra-White mating blurring ethnic boundaries, it would still be useful to know how many White Americans identify as various ethnic groups, etc.  Knowledge is good, as they say.  And contra Sailer, asking people if they identify as German-American is not going to lead to a revival of the Bund.  

Short summary: observe what it is that the HBDers recommend and support the opposite.