Category: space

First Contact and the Metapolitics of Race

Food for thought.

Read this.  Excerpts, emphasis added:

Getting it wrong because decision-making was freighted with unreasonable expectations might result in consequences that range from the merely amusing to the deeply frustrating to the existentially threatening.

The same continuum of consequences from “the merely amusing to the deeply frustrating to the existentially threatening” equally describes decisions on topics related to race and civilization. Some of the nuttiness of the SJWs or the HBDers or Der Movement is merely amusing. Some is deeply frustrating and many merge seamlessly into the existentially threatening. It is sometimes difficult to “bin” a particular decision (or meme) into any of those categories, since the effects of a seemingly “merely amusing” decision or meme may quickly become frustrating and then threatening.  It also depends on your point of view.  For Joe and Jill Sixpack, decisions about whether to try and contact intelligent alien life are amusing – “the nerds are trying to contact the little green men.” Others may become frustrated; Tyrone Carjacker may complain – “why is Whitey wasting money on that instead of increasing my handouts?”  Intelligent Whites may feel threatened by others revealing our presence to potentially dangerous extraterrestrials. Likewise, many short-sighted Whites are amused by the concerns of WNs, while SJWs are frustrated that WNs care about race, while the WNs themselves view the problems they are concerned about as existential threats.

We proceed by first assessing possible risks and benefits of First Contact. The daunting language problem serves as the linchpin between possible risks and benefits. We then examine the underlying political problem before offering some conclusions about optimal public policy making.

Such balancing of costs and benefits were never done with respect to current racial policies in America and Europe as they concern the racial interests of Whites.

Possible risks…What worries pessimists is the possibility that silence is motivated by rational existential fear. A preference for survival as a species and extraordinary uncertainty about possible risks attending contact between different intelligent technological species may have persuaded most species to avoid alerting others to their own existence…When Stephen Hawking warned against alerting any extraterrestrial civilization to our existence he offered as a familiar cautionary example the discovery of the Americas by Christopher Columbus. It follows that silence is thus a plausible strategy for a risk-averse species because the result for any other species that might be listening is indistinguishable from a universe empty of species with technological civilizations.

If only we had the same prudent risk aversion for multiculturalism. Speaking of multiculturalism and diversity, another explanation for the “silence of the endless wastes of space” is this interpretation of The Fermi Paradox, which is directly related to the race question.

That all of those encounters ended badly for one party, frequently involving population crashes and extinction, should not be ignored by policy makers. We note, however, that the analytic value of these analogies is constrained by three considerations. First, there are no data for…encounters between populations of intelligent but unrelated species, which would encompass First Contact. 

What about Europeans and East Asians? 


Also, if you are going to make analogies between Alien-Human First Contact and European-Colored First Contact, then you should follow the latter to its ultimate conclusion – reverse colonization of Europe by the Third World, Coloreds using European technics for Colored empowerment and to endlessly multiply, and guilt-wracked Europeans groveling to the world of Color. Will invasive Aliens crumble and grovel to Humans the same as Europeans have done to Coloreds?

What matters here is that terrestrial analogies to encounters between populations offer the only empirical information for assessing the risks of First Contact. It follows that silence is thus a plausible strategy for a risk-averse species because the result for any other species that might be listening is indistinguishable from a universe empty of species with technological civilizations. Even if every intelligent entity would be benevolent towards other intelligent entity given the opportunity to interact, an implicit silence norm might be self-reinforcing as species choose to interpret the uncertainty inherent in the result as possible evidence of the rational behavior by other species. If you do not hear anyone else speaking, then either there is no one to talk to or they may know to be quiet for a very good reason.

And maybe the fact that non-White peoples tend to avoid multiculturalism and diversity within their own nations suggests that they know that it is best to be racially homogeneous “for a very good reason.”

Comparing Chinese with German, Christian Helmut Wenzel notes how the tendencies of (human) languages derived from their cultural evolution create habits of thought. For example, Chinese language requires Chinese speakers to be more context sensitive than German language requires of German speakers, both in text and in speech. In another example, Chinese speakers use vertical spatial metaphors to reference time—for example the future is described as “down”—while German speakers use horizontal spatial metaphors to reference time.

That is quite remarkable, and underscores how alien the Chinese (and other East Asians) are from Europeans (as represented by Germans) – their conception of time itself (!) is radically different.  How can the thought processes of such different peoples – akin to different species – be bridged?  It cannot be done.  Indeed, we must consider the possibility that East Asians are more alien to Europeans than are sub-Saharan Africans.

Benefits…What do political decision-makers know about the benefits attending First Contact? The answer is that they know very little. Indeed, the claimed benefits appear to reflect wishful thinking…It sometimes seems as a means of inoculating the public against xenophobia about human Others.

That is outrageous, particularly when we consider that all of these “means of inoculating the public against xenophobia about human Others” are aimed solely at Whites. No one is attempting to lessen Chinese ethnocentrism and xenophobia; it is only Whites who are targeted for thought control, to break down their defenses so they lower their guard against the Other. Speaking of existential threats, this constant meme war against Whites – now including leveraging SETI for anti-White memetic propaganda – is the prime existential threat we face.  We need to worry about that before we worry about the little green men.

More to the point, concerns about extraterrestrial intelligence (ETI – the “S” in SETI being “Search”) should increase, not decrease, White concerns about their racial survival.  Who should be at the forefront of humanity’s attempts to interface with ETI?  The idea that it could be sub-Saharan Africans, including African-“Americans,” is absurd.  Who?  Muslims? Hispanics?  Who?  Do you trust East Asians and Jews to do so – or would you fear that they would sell out the rest of humanity for their own racial self-interest?  Who?  South Asians? New Guineans?  Australian Aboriginals?  The race you would want to do this is the same race you would trust to deflect an asteroid or comet strike – Whites.  And it would have to be a mixed group of White types. Leaving it up to the Nordic “high trust northern hunter gatherers” means we’ll have a “yes we can” campaign to facilitate an alien invasion. Swarthoids and Slavs would be more level-headed, but the Swarthoids would be singing to the aliens from balconies, while the Slavs would be swilling vodka. A coordinated pan-European White response would be best.  Only a mixed White response can leverage the strengths of each White sub-type, while masking each group’s weakness. Such a response would by necessity require the continued racial existence of Whites.

Belief in the benign character of any extraterrestrial entity is sufficiently common among members of the attentive public that The Planetary Society uses it to raise money…

Tin cup rattling.

What do political decision-makers know about the risks attending First Contact? The answer is woefully little, and what they do know is decidedly woeful…What do political decision-makers know about the risks attending First Contact? The answer is woefully little, and what they do know is decidedly woeful…Memes, in the original sense that Richard Dawkins coined the term, could be demoralizing and disruptive in the same manner as pandemics. As we are discovering in the 21st century, information itself may be weaponized.

Indeed, memes are being weaponized to hasten White extinction.  What if  ETI recognizes that Whites are the biggest threat to alien domination of the Earth, and utilize meme warfare aimed at Whites?  What if Jews sell out humanity and help the aliens devise anti-White information warfare (a skill set the Jews have in abundance and one that they have much practice using).

Given the worrisome “cat-killing” curiosity common to our species, some may be tempted to respond to a radio signal before it is deciphered and before it is determined whether humans are the intended audience….The time horizons for decision makers are typically much shorter. Long-term consequences of even the most momentous policy making may be discounted in favor of near-term advantages that can be reckoned in public opinion polls and election outcomes.

Indeed, short-term thinking is a problem, particularly among capitalist oriented societies in which making a quick buck at the long term expense of societal stability is prized.

Decision-makers are no less prone than anyone else to errors of misperception that are the product of a human proclivity to tell one another stories in which missing information is replaced with supposition…These tendencies to misperception may be reinforced by both the “groupthink” syndrome identified by Irving Janis and the competition between bureaucratic organizations even during existential crises identified by Graham Allison and Philip Zelikow.

Same for racial crises.

The political problem is initially one of choosing between non response and delayed response…any response to the message should be delayed at least until the message has been deciphered and the intended recipient identified. Potential existential threats warrant decision making patience born of extreme caution.

The same applies to racial decisions. Patience and extreme caution would counsel a rejection of mass migration, miscegenation, etc. Why radically alter a society and a population without fully understanding the ramifications? Particularly since what we do understand tells us that it’s disastrous.

Non-response will require official messaging to dampen both public and scientific enthusiasm. As the experience of nuclear deterrence during the Cold War reveals, news audiences can be persuaded to accept the strategic logic of preparation coupled with inaction. What that is likely to require are periodic official reports on progress in deciphering the message together with a narrative emphasizing the possible existential threat. Although it rubs against the grain of thinking since the beginning of the Modern Era, humans are proficient at living in a state of fear. Indeed, traditional societies are characterized by hostility to strangers, finding in that antipathy a source of social unity.

Ahh, now they say that hostility to strangers can be a source of social unity, while before it was that we need to use SETI to break down xenophobia. The former is for non-Whites, while the latter poison is targeted to Whites only.

Unless the message can be determined to have been intentionally transmitted and that humanity is its intended recipient rather than some other extraterrestrial entity, then not responding remains the optimally rational decision. The value of not responding would be reduced, though not entirely eliminated, if it is determined that humanity is the intended recipient because that would indicate knowledge of our location in space and perhaps other information. Not responding to a message would deny the extraterrestrial entity additional information that might render humanity even more vulnerable. If the message evidenced some malign intent in the form of a threat or weaponized meme, then not responding remains the optimally rational decision.

Another optional rational decision – racial homogeneity.

There are possible advantages to listening in on communications between extraterrestrial entities without their knowledge. Given prophylactic measures to avoid releasing a weaponized meme, the intelligence collected through covert monitoring could be used in deciding whether and how best to respond to a message. Indeed, such monitoring might provide the benefits of First Contact without incurring the risks.

We can interact with other races with everyone staying in their own homelands, without incurring the risk of multiculturalism in the “West.”

Conclusion

The relatively high probability of the existence of extraterrestrial intelligence has led to conversation about the possibility of prolonged communication with such distant intelligences. A number of logistical details beset and make problematic any attempt to engage in the communication between Earth and whatever lies in the great beyond that might speak back to us. That engaging in such communication will be advantageous is by no means a foregone conclusion. Indeed, there are good reasons to suspect that the encounter will be either non-advantageous or disadvantageous, and very possibly extraordinarily dangerous.

Just like multiculturalism is “extraordinarily dangerous” for Whites.

What a national political decision-maker is likely to seek upon encountering an extraterrestrial radio signal will depend on both their relative risk acceptance and on their willingness to act in concert with other national political decision-makers who are in possession of the same information. At present, the bureaucratic scientific apparatus for detecting such is still limited to a handful of countries, but as that number grows a coordinated response becomes more difficult, not the least because of the temptation to defect from a policy of restraint by seeking an advantage in establishing communication.

Just like some Whites succumb to the temptation to be race traitors in order to secure personal advantages within the System.

7/21/19 in Der News

In der news.

Strom’s latest.

I wonder if Oberth is now going to be “unpersoned.”  First Shockley, now Oberth – who is the next intellectual giant to be shown to have had healthy instincts?

Also, I wonder what Strom thinks of those in Der Movement who mock the idea of space colonization as “utopian dreaming” because of “peak oil” and who assert that the future of man is “the forest instead of the stars.”  After all, we need to leave the stars to The Holy Oriental, while the White Man cowers in his “snug hobbit hole” in the forest.

One can also criticize Pierce’s “twigs and branches” approach, because, truth be told, putting a man on the moon involved a massive scientific, technical, and industrial infrastructure, backed up by an urbanized state, not by a bunch of city-hating folks “living on the mountaintop.” 

Behold the God Emperor:

cerberus the devil dog
‏Replying to @EvanMcLaren @RichardBSpencer
tommy robinson a man whose life and family are truly in danger was on his hands and knees begging trump for help only to fall on deaf ears but for some gangsta thug rapper he springs into action  in a matter of minutes what piece of shit💩💩

Der Movement:

Richard  ☀️ Spencer
The Republican “race baiting” strategy really hasn’t changed much in half a century. Trump is just less subtle about it.
Race is always the *bait*. Working-class White people keep voting GOP… and remain mired in demoralization and decline.

Sallis rewrite of Spencer’s comment:

Der Movement’s “dago baiting” strategy really hasn’t changed much in half a century. Kemp, Donaldson, Durocher, et al. are just less subtle about it.
Nordicism is always the *bait*. Type I activists keep supporting the Quota Queens…. and remain mired in demoralization and decline.

Odds and Ends, 6/5/19

Several items.

Meet Julius Evola.

Giulio Cesare Evola was born in Rome. The parents of Giulio Cesare Evola were Vincenzo Evola, born 4 May 1854, and Concetta Mangiapane, born 15 August 1865. They were both born in Cinisi, a small town and municipality in the Province of Palermo in the north-western coast of Sicily.

As well as “the Philosopher of Fascism.”

Giovanni Gentile was born in Castelvetrano, Sicily.

Anyone remember Negro Thomas Sowell’s pontification that Southern Italians had nothing to do with Fascism?  Just like the HBDers, non-Whites always like to lie in order to divide Europeans against each other.  Non-White HBDers are the worst.

And is Der Movement going to officially revoke Julius Evola’s “Traditionalist Hero” membership card?  How can the Type I Traditionalists continue to value the work of that Negro?

Radical leftist Antifa Don Trump and his neo-Marxist DOJ defeated.

A degenerate Negro.

Traditionalism meets astronomy!  

getgetgetgotgotgot
2 months ago
What is the esoteric meaning of Aldebaran?
Jackson
Jackson
1 month ago
It’s the origin of the Aryan people at least the ones remaining on earth, who fled civil decay and started the civilization of mankind that fell around 8-12,000 years ago. Their descendants are still here today. However they are not originally from here. The lore goes back some of the oldest historians as well as occult histories. Namely works such as “The Race to Come” is inspired by such works. Maria Orsic etc. Etc. Theres to much to cover.

What about Antares or Betelgeuse?  Rigel?  Is Ultima Thule in the Canopus system?  The Aryans of Archernar!

This is where Der Movement’s Quota Queen “leadership” will bring us.

Joan of Arc!  Greg Johnson weeps.

More News in Der News

In der news.  In all cases, emphasis added.

How’s that ethnonationalism working out for you?  Poles out, Brownsters and Blacksters in.

Ted Sallis: Asians pimp out their women for influence in the West (whatever remains of it).

Reality actualized; Sallis correctSee here.

Meanwhile, Der Movement tells us to worship Trump, no wait, Putin, no wait, Reagan, no wait, Princess Tulsi Coconut, no wait, Andy Eggroll (the Yang Gang!), no wait…or, they pontificate about the “deep Asgardian themes” of Shakin’ “Big Red” Stevens.

Sallis:  Always, always right.

Der Movement: Wrong, wrong, they’re always wrong.

Don’t forget to ignore the former and gather around the latter, because, well, you know….

Gather around the Affirm-Act cases: Like Quota King Mudshark Annie.

In Trump We Trust! E Pluribus Awesome!

What a turd this Trump is.  Hey, Antifa Don, do you remember the first two years of your “Presidency” (if you can call it that), when you had a Republican Congress?  How about your recent call for increased immigration?

A question. The proper answer: Ted Sallis has been right about Trump from the very beginning.

Andy with his folk.  Laughing at Whitey willing to sell their posterity for $1000 per month.

Yeah, funny.  Hey, Greg, who was it who was saying that Trump was going to stabilize White demographics? Think real hard now.

While there was some sense here, there was also:

In short, we needed a miracle. Only a god could save us. Or a God Emperor.

MAGA!  Pepe! Kek!

Electing Donald Trump to his first term was just the battle for Helm’s Deep. The battle for Middle Earth is about to begin.

An orc, an orc!  My hobbit hole for an orc!

But even if you are a liberal, your birthright as an American means something to Donald Trump. Try it on for size. It might start meaning something to you too.

Donald Trump promises to bring many changes to American politics, but the most fundamental one is sincerity.

And that time, I was calling Trump a fraud and a buffoon.

Sallis: Always right.

Der Movement: Always wrong.

…and by being pro-American, Trump cannot be against the white majority, whereas the Democrats and mainstream Republicans both promoted policies destructive of the white majority.

Beyond that, Trump’s proposals to build a wall on the Mexican border, deport millions of illegal aliens, and ban Muslim immigration would slow the demographic displacement of whites, giving us a few extra decades before we become a minority in our homeland. We can use that extra time to rally our people and create a consensus around policies that will halt and then reverse our demographic decline.

If Donald Trump is elected, he will slow down the demographic displacement of whites which will make it possible for White Nationalists to salvage the United States and turn it into a white homeland.

Taylor praising the Alt Right here.  Down the memory hole!

Johnson on the Alt Right.  Remember, back then, I was openly criticizing the Alt Right.

Johnson on Trump:

He is the last chance to save America.

All hail the American Caesar!

Remember, I was calling Trump a Negrophilic race cuck and Touchback Trump at that time.

Trump’s immigration policies will definitely slow down the rate of white demographic decline…

Yeah…those of us who were calling Trump a fraud back then are not surprised that he is now calling for increased “legal” immigration.  Can you same the same, Greg?


MAGA! Pepe! Kek!

The Mudshark on Dinesh Penis syndrome.  Will Jef Costello be the White House butler in a Coulter administration?


From failure to failure.  From one wrecked organization to another.  Following in the footsteps of Duke and Spencer.  Affirmative action is as affirmative action does.


So, will Spencer start supporting Johnson for President?  What would be the catchy meme to describe that?  The Greg Dreg?  Not as good as The Yang Gang, I admit.


African space research – no, not an oxymoron!  To the stars (after a pit stop at the local KFC)!