Category: STEM

Odds and Ends, 6/18/20

In der news.  In all cases, emphasis added.
Sallis right once again.  How many times have I warned you about Asian – particularly Chinese – infiltration of American STEM?

Some 54 scientists have resigned or been fired as a result of an ongoing investigation by the National Institutes of Health into the failure of NIH grantees to disclose financial ties to foreign governments. In 93% of those cases, the hidden funding came from a Chinese institution.

The new numbers come from Michael Lauer, NIH’s head of extramural research. Lauer had previously provided some information on the scope of NIH’s investigation, which had targeted 189 scientists at 87 institutions. But his presentation today to a senior advisory panel offered by far the most detailed breakout of an effort NIH launched in August 2018 that has roiled the U.S. biomedical community, and resulted in criminal charges against some prominent researchers. {snip}


In the vast majority of cases, Lauer reported, the person being investigated has been an Asian man in his 50s. {snip}

Lauer also presented data on the nature of the violations that NIH has uncovered. Some 70% (133) of the researchers had failed to disclose to NIH the receipt of a foreign grant, and 54% had failed to disclose participation in a foreign talent program. {snip}

Lauer said the fact that 82% of those being investigated are Asian “is not surprising” because “that’s who the Chinese target” in their foreign talent recruitment programs. {snip}

Someone knows the score:


We don’t need Asians in our society. They have to go back.

Excellent, excellent.
Remember, don’t upset the HBDers.  China is sacrosanct.  Mumble about it being an adversary, but let’s not support anyone who wants to confront it.
See this.  Not bad, but this part is completely illogical:

Let us turn to dispel some of the things which you should not enlist for. I am hesitant to even address it, but enlisting for ‘‘boogaloo’’ training — as in infantry tactics, techniques, and procedures — is honestly silly. First, there are already legions of veterans, many with combat experience, who are already part of or adjacent to our movement. Virile men prefer virile jobs and virile politics; this is basic biology.

Second, there is a disturbing trend of the treasonous brass freaking out about ‘‘white supweeemacists’’ entering the ranks to obtain combat training. At first glance, this may seem like an argument to pursue it, as what the adversary doesn’t want is usually a good thing. However, it is probable that inquisitorial-like scrutiny will only increase. If you are doxed while in uniform, and especially in something that is combat-related or requires a security clearance, it’s not going to be fun. To the argument that you are dox proof because you aren’t part of an official nationalist organization, remember that doxing has been expanded to include moralistic busybodies reporting that guys once said the N-word two years ago and the like.

Assuming that you are not so stupid as to openly announce your intentions, then how are the “treasonous brass” going to distinguish the folks who joined the military for “boogaloo training” from those who want to get free college?  You are going to have the same risks of doxing or official persecution either way. And if you are not a member of an “official nationalist organization” and have never behaved like a jackass on social media, exactly what are you going to be persecuted about? Being White?  How would that change based upon your own private intentions and personal motivations? Again, I don’t understand how a person’s private and personal objectives are going to become magically known by the “treasonous brass.” And isn’t “combat training” – at least in its most elementary form – something you are going to get in the military regardless if you “pursue” it?  Something doesn’t add up here.

Yes, Greg, yes.  Now, let’s see what you wrote about Trump earlier – read here.

What Sallis wrote about Trump back right before the 2016 election:

…Trump is a vulgar ignorant buffoon, a Negro-loving beta race cuck civic nationalist with a Jewified family, an overweight imbecile, a lazy and ill-prepared debater, an embarrassment of a political candidate, a blustering clown, and a crass jackass

.And also. And this:

Let’s be honest though: Trump the man is a disaster, easily the worst general campaign candidate in my lifetime.  I’ve never seen such a combination of joyful ignorance, in-your-face laziness, unpreparedness, delusion, inability to learn from mistakes, the hysterical lack of restraint one would expect from one of Trump’s Negro friends (or even worse: a swarthoid Afrowop) – what is this Trump?  He’s a goddamn embarrassment.I endorse Trump, even though I personally believe he is lazy and ignorant buffoon, an idiot with Jewish family connections, unread and unprepared, not very bright, hysterically undisciplined, a race cuck to the Negro – it is not Trump’s supporters who are the “basket of deplorables,” it is instead Trump’s myriad personal flaws that instead constitute the basket.

Oh, and this is what I wrote immediately after the election:

You’ve been given a gift – a rare historical opportunity.  I doubt the Old Movement is up to the task.

Truer words never written.

There’s a joke in bodybuilding circles about men with good genetics for muscle-building – “he picked the right parents.” 
By analogy, we can say that people like Greg Johnson and Peter Brimelow “picked the right ancestors.” If they were instead named, say, Guido Wopirini or Boratoslav Balkanovic, no one in Der Movement would tolerate their buffoonery, much less give them a dime.  
Affirmative action!

An updated biography of Johnson is here.  My contention that most (if not all) people in the “movement” who were originally libertarians are utterly useless is supported.  And then we have those who were originally liberals.  Indeed, most of the Quota Queen leadership were one or the other.  That alone tells you something.

Well maybe we could find out this information if money was channeled in the right direction, instead of hundreds of thousands of dollars per year disappearing into the VDARE black hole.

This is America.  But, hey, be Amnats, not Wignats – we gotta preserve dem dere constitutional rights!

Not the Best Scientists

Answering a moron.

A moron:

The problem here is that Asians are basically the best scientists, as seen in their dominance of science departments at top US research universities…

No.  The “dominance” is due to:

1. Asian ethnocentrism vs. White universalism. Asian PIs typically hire Asian underlings. Meanwhile, White PIs will often – in some cases preferentially – hire Asian underlings because of the issues listed below. There is a continuous ratchet here moving in the direction of the displacement of Whites by Asians in STEM.  Asians hire Asians out of ethnocentrism and rampant ethnic nepotism, while Whites hire Asians out of Universalist naiveté and ethnic masochism. Of course, then, the Asians will “dominate.” It is always amusing to see a scientific paper with all-Chinese authorship, assuming the lab is from China, and then seeing that is from the USA instead.  American labs are full of Chinese, with Chinese PIs excluding Whites and hiring only Chinese.

2. Asians are willing to, at least initially, work for less (cheap labor) and for longer hours. The latter holds because they do very little actual work – much time instead being used to play the stock market, steal data and ideas, sit around and gibber in Mandarin (loudly screeching), etc.

3. Despite their time wasting, Asians produce a lot of data, advancing their careers and making them more attractive to White PIs. How do they do so?  Read Bottle of Lies to understand the corrupt Asian biomedical research culture. When you are willing to invent, manipulate, steal, etc. data then, yes, you can produce much “data.”  Two anecdotes come to mind, told to me by various colleagues over the years (presented here in the most general terms, with no pertinent details, of course).

First, a Chinese working for a White PI produced an “important paper” by showing that gene “X” is not expressed in cell line “Y” after treatment “Z” – with high clinical significance. Hoorah!  Problem is, after the Chinese parlayed that into a higher position elsewhere, a White researcher could not reproduce those results. After much investigation, it was discovered that the Chinese got the “desired” data by exposing the blot to film for an extremely absurdly short period of time, so there was not enough time for the band to show. If I recall correctly what I was told about the incident, for normalization, the blot filter was cut and the area of the filter for the normalization gene was exposed for the correct time, disguising the fact that the experimental band was not present because of the short exposure.  Of course, the White PI did not get upset at the Chinese fraud but instead at the White who exposed the fraud.

Second, a grant reviewer reviewing a grant put forth by a research group led by Asians discovered that some of the blots in the grant were from a previous paper by the same group, turned upside down, and relabeled as something else. Essentially, fabricated data

4. Asians demonstrate ethnocentrism by showing favoritism in the grant and paper reviews of their co-ethnics, advancing the research careers of those co-ethnics as opposed to Whites, whose work is more harshly (perhaps, unfairly) reviewed..

5. If any of the Asian “scientists” are (ostensibly) female, then some White PIs no doubt hire and promote them for, shall we say, Derbyshirian reasons.

6. I documented incidents (at my previous Western Biopolitics blog, I believe) of Asians (in that case, South Asians) sabotaging the research of Whites working in the same lab as them.

7. The presence of larger numbers of Asians in American science not only makes STEM careers less attractive because of low wages, but also because of low prestige (an occupation highly represented by a bunch of clannish, gibbering, corrupt foreigners), and an alienating and unpleasant work environment (dominated by White-hating, ethnocentric Asians, screeching in foreign languages and eating foul-smelling food). So, educated Whites go into other professions, pushed out of STEM in favor of Asiatics.

STEM, Patrik, Free Speech, and the Female

And other odds and ends.

Zman agonizes over “scientific theology” and how the Left has delegitimized genuine STEM. While his complaints are valid, what does he expect? The Right has always been anti-science, anti-empirical, faith driven, and full or irrational dogma-driven kooks. Thus, the Right has handed over STEM to the Left without a fight.

Emphasis added:


Yes, and the nonsense from the left tees up a reaction from the right. Vox Day and Owen Benjamin are seriously auguring flat-eartherism and fake moon landings. They have lost any faith in scientific authorities and for good reason. It’s understandable, but nonetheless get your kids vaccinated.


Someone told me one of them is now saying dinosaurs are a hoax.


I think the anti-dinosaur theories are interesting.

Not a serious subscriber to any theory, but my personal faves are demons (nephilim) and dragons.

I’m more skeptical of the claim that dinosaurs and humans didn’t coexist. And yea, with science in the place it is, we are seriously living in a post-science age.

Liars is how we got here.


Why, I’m pretty old and I don’t remember any such creatures.

Anyways, the troll Owen flirts with all nonsense. Not to say paleontology isn’t corrupt like many academic sciences.

George Orwell

I lost much respect for Beale when he started peddling the moon landing hoax shinola.

And, guys, if you depend on a piece of absolute filth like HBD shill race traitor Cochran to carry water for you in scientific debates, you have already lost. With the death of Harpending, you guys have absolute ZERO competent STEM folks on your side.  Me, I could have been on your side, but I’ve had enough of your retarded and destructive Der Movement, Inc. I care only about my own groupuscule; and all of you can just go to hell among your mix of HBD pseudoscientist hacks, science-deniers, moon landing hoaxers, flat earthers, Flintstone paleontologists, and “traditionalists” gibbering about Yogi Bear (“Kali Yuga”) and “the men who can’t tell time.” The Right, particularly the Far Right, actively rejects and repulses genuine STEM people. You can’t even retain foaming-at-the-mouth Nutzis like Ted Sallis on your side.  What does that say about you and your (lack of) dedication to scientific truth?

And I must say that the (Far) Right has a lot of chutzpah to accuse the Left of a blind-faith “theology” on science, when Der Movement is at least just as bad.

Also see this.

Again: The Right activity repels and repulses STEM people and other academics, and then they wonder about the dominance of the Left in the intellectual life of the West (or what passes for it).

When the whole Greta Thunberg thing erupted, I stupidly and naively thought to myself – “even Der Movement, with its insanely obsessive ethnic fetishism and ultra-Nordicist obsessions, won’t make Ladogan Greta into some sort of admirable “movement” heroine.  Even they wouldn’t go so far.”  Well, I was wrong.

So, when I now joke about Der Movement praising the Swedish homosexual anti-racist infiltrator of the Alt Right, Patrik Hermansson, I should probably reconsider and stop treating it is a joke. Likely they will start praising Hermansson. Let’s see how this can be done:

You see, Patrik became involved in HopeNotHate because of his noble idealism. Being derived from northern high trust hunter gatherers, Patrik’s racially superior disinterested propensity to societal consensus, and his rugged Nordic individualism, has made him prey to the dastardly machinations of greasy omnidominant Mediterraneans. Patrik is not at fault!  His natural propensity to heroism – of great benefit to all humanity! – has been hijacked, and once he returns to the fold of his people, he’ll put on his horned helmet, pick up his battle axe, and be a scourge against the scurrying swarthoids!  We need more men like Patrik Hermansson. 

Cue Durocher, TOO, and Counter-Currents….

Let us once again consider Inyoung You, now the new poster girl for MGTOW.  Emphasis added:

Rollins’ comments came as she announced that Inyoung You, a 21-year-old former Boston College student, was charged in an indictment with involuntary manslaughter for her boyfriend’s suicide.

You allegedly tracked the location of her boyfriend, Alexander Urtula, on May 20 and was present when he jumped from a parking garage just hours before his BC graduation, Rollins told reporters.

Girlfriend charged in Boston College student’s death after telling him hundreds of times; to kill himself, prosecutors say

Authorities said You was “physically, verbally and psychologically abusive” toward Urtula during their relationship. That abuse became more frequent, more powerful and more demeaning in the days and hours leading up to his suicide, Rollins said.

You sent him more than 47,000 text messages and prosecutors said she had complete and total control over Urtula. She repeatedly told him to “go kill himself” or “go die” and that she, his family and the world would be better off without him, officials said.
She also allegedly used manipulative attempts and threats of self-harm to control him and isolate him from his family, officials said.

Determining motive is an important part of a criminal prosecution.  Here are some questions the prosecutors should be asking, and ordinary men should be asking as well:

At what point in the relationship did You decide to drive Urtala to suicide?

Did You get involved in the relationship from the beginning with the objective of driving Urtala to suicide?

If You was present at the suicide, did she derive sexual satisfaction from watching it?  Did she orgasm?

What was the underlying motivation for these behaviors?  Anti-male hatred and envy?

Now, the White Knights – some of whom are homosexual – will have fainting vapors over these questions, but too bad. Given the facts of the case, and given the society-wide implications for judging general female behavior, these questions are wholly legitimate.

As regards Durocher’s comments about how women nag men to enforce (the female perception of) social norms, we can consider the implications for the specific case of women being allowed to participate in racial activism.  Will they behave the same way there?  Will female activists nag male activists to be more moderate, be less radical, accept a feminist perspective, accept “based” non-Whites, accept Neocon agendas, etc?  Consider how the French Front National was emasculated and wrecked by Milady Marine, Queen of Mainstreaming, and all for naught, leading to a humiliating electoral defeat.  Any lessons learned there?

An effective answer to the moronic shitheel Jeelvy, who is, by far, the worst and most juvenile writer in the history of racial activism.

This is the dire reality of today.  Meanwhile, the grifters tell you that victory is just around the corner just as long as you send in the “D’Nations.”  After all, life is expensive in those blue state utopias – all those gym memberships, movie tickets, and visits to Europe (that, curiously, the leading grifters can do with impunity while Taylor and Spencer are banned) – you guys gotta pay for it.  Give dem dere shekels!  After all, those who give live in the golden age today!  Savitri Devi will thank you for it!  By the way, isn’t it interesting that all these “traditionalists” who love Evola are pro-feminist White Knighters who oppose the very “traditionalist” ideals they profess to believe in?

Also note Trump’s Homeland Security is proposing censorship of his own supporters.  Trump: A man of genuine greatness – sincere genuine greatness!

By the way, a defense of free speech from this blog from several years ago – see here.

We need politics – all our “metapolitical” grifters do nothing but waste money that could have been used more effectively elsewhere.

The Arctic Alliance marches on.

So much time, so much failure.