Let’s take a look at past Counter-Comments comments on this issue:
The way he has treated his father is absolutely shameless, and if Derek has any conscience to speak of, he’ll regret it down the road. But Derek has also behaved shamelessly toward our cause in general, a cause from which, as alleged and to all appearances, he voluntarily accepted benefits and perks until quite recently. Those who are making excuses for him are making a mistake. Sympathy is a positive trait, and a sign of decency and character. But it can be misplaced, and condoning gratuitously crummy behavior is misplaced sympathy. We may sympathize with his having been born under the klieg lights, and we may understand why he wanted out of the movement. So far, so good. Leaving is fine, but you don’t get to lob hand grenades on the way out.
I would like Derek to see how he can walk away from the issue of White Genocide with just a shrug. You can change your mind on things like “white nationalism” or similar topics, but no one can just shrug off genocide. So, either he doesn’t believe it or he doesn’t care.
If he doesn’t care, that would be sociopathic. Nothing else need be said. If he doesn’t agree that we are seeing genocide through social engineering, than he never actually understood the real fact supporting that claim
This is exactly what I think. Look, the facts are clear: by any reasonable definition of genocide, including that of the United Nations, Whites are being subjected to genocide. I do not quite grasp how someone can understand that one minute and then, after their transition to a saintly progressive, all of a sudden all of these same facts and concepts are not understood. All of the facts and trends that Derek Black cited when he was WN still exist today; it’s just that his attitude changed. Thus, after being scolded by a bunch of whining Jewboys, Derek has decided that a set of facts which he previously understood were consistent with White genocide no longer matter.
Dropping out of the dysfunctional freakshow of Der Movement is one thing. It’s quite another to reverse yourself on basic principles. White genocide is true or it is not. If it is true, then the commentator’s designation that Derek’s current attitude is “sociopathic” is correct. If it is not true, why did Derek believe it before? That he was “misled” by Der Movement? Misled how? Are the facts correct or are they not? The long-term demographic trends, and the policies driving those trends, have not changed. Only Derek’s attitude toward the reality of those trends have changed. Ergo, White genocide is real, and Derek Black is a sociopathic quota queen.
Nepotism, yes. The fact that this empty vessel – who turns his worldview on its head because a bunch of Jews made him feel bad – was elevated to leadership simply because of who his father is, that’s bad enough. But, let’s face facts: Derek Black is also the perfect example of Der Movement’s ethnic affirmative action policy, tailor-made (or is that Taylor-made?) to appeal to the flotsam and jetsam of “movement” masses. That’s what you get when you elevate people for reasons other than merit: institutionalized incompetence, “crummy” behavior, mental weaklings, traitors, morons, and decades of unremitting failure.
I found the following comment I made over at Counter-Currents a few years ago relevant to this situation (the italics are quotes from another comment that I was answering):
No, sorry, the “giants” had money. They had supporters. For decades. And what did they do? Hide out on a mountaintop, bashing the people sending them money? Engaging in serial monogamy with mail order Eastern European brides? Writing cartoonish versions of “history?” Marching around with swastika armbands? Or, others who have plenty of our “dinero” over the years hosting meetings so that the Chosen Ones can insult the audience? While the “giants” insult their own supporters while placating the enemy? Or maybe “giants” taking the “dinero” and gambling it away?
Who? Who are these giants? We’ve wasted decades, and we have a fundamental problem because of social pricing, because the “movement” humiliated itself for decades, because of the White tendency for individualism. The people we need to be active, to step up as leaders cannot, or will not, do so, for the reasons just mentioned. So we have by default the loony-tunes brigade, the sieg-heilers, the dysfunctional.
Perhaps some of you “elites” of the movement could get off your ars…er high horses and start working with these folks instead of bashing them.
Work with whom? Thanks to “movement” stupidity and the “as long as they say they support us they must be OK” mindset, a large number of the “folks” are gov’t informers, “anti” infiltrators, or just plain nuts. That’s the reality. One does not have to be wealthy or an “elite genius” to use a bit of common sense. But most of the “folks” don’t have even that.
And I’m feeling a contradiction between the admonition to balkanize, balkanize, balkanize when we are also not supposed to be “endlessly running to ever more remote suburban enclaves.”
There’s no contradiction. If you “run to the suburbs” and then vote for Obama or Romney, you’re part of the problem. If you “run to the suburbs” and contribute in some way to delegitimizing the System, you are part of the solution. I criticize the implicit whiteness of “soccer moms” and “soccer dads” who run away from diversity while at the same time supporting the very system that forces them to run away in the first place.
Hindsight is 20/20…
Yes, one needs a lot of “hindsight” to avoid those things mentioned in the first paragraph here, which is just the tip of the iceberg. No, the problem is that “movement” dysfunction is self-perpetuating. Because of a lack of discrimination (ironic for “racists”), any droolcup or opponent who professes support is accepted and given the keys to the kingdom. After the inevitable disasters, well-meaning and rational potential supporters become discouraged, leaving behind the dregs. The dregs contribute more stupidity and over time we have a “movement” consisting of people who almost exactly match the stereotypes of our opponents.
The only way to break the cycle is to be intolerant of past, present, and future dysfunction. The “giants” wasted countless piles of CASH and DINERO, they wasted years/decades of peoples’ lives, they caused chaos, and they delegitimized WN to people who otherwise would have been more amenable to it.
We do not stand on the shoulders of giants. We are trying to dig ourselves out of a hole created by pygmies.
Again, going back to Derek Black: I agree with commentator Trainspotter: dropping out is not the problem; the problem is turning against a set of ideals you previously professed to base your life on, and to do for the most flimsy of reasons. Did Derek even care to find out if the propaganda from his new Jewish friends was correct or not? Why didn’t he go to his father and say: “Hey Dad, I’m having a crisis of conscience about this whole racial thing? Look at these articles I found. Is this true?” And, hopefully, the elder Black would have been able to direct his son to the proper ripostes to the Jewish flim-flam and then Derek would have realized that Moshe Finkelstein and company were lying to him. But, no. He just “went thermonuclear” as the commentators put it, abandoning WN without even giving WN a real chance to answer back. Which tells me he was never actually committed to begin with. I’m sorry. Anyone who knows anything about the real science of racial differences (not HBD trash which is all about reducing the entire White race to the equivalent of a pussy-whipped Derbyshire and his “measured groveling” [his own words!] to “Rosie”) would be able to produce an enormous amount of material countering lies that Negro incompetence was due to “racism” or ‘White Privilege.” Even mere common sense would tell any half-way honest person that if the facts were on the side of the progressives, why must they silence and persecute those who think different (James Watson being a prime example of Left hysteria)? Just bring out all dem dere “facts” and win the debate. And, as stated above, the issue of White genocide is beyond question. That little Derek couldn’t effectively argue back against Jewish lies is evidence he never understood what is was all about to begin with. Just like some affirmative action Negress baffled by an assignment she does not understand and cannot perform, little Derek was thrust into a position of authority into an endeavor more important than any other – White racial survival – and his ineptness has helped ruin it.
And the problem goes deeper. While I do not want to “pile on” to the Black family (who are suffering over this),it is clear that Derek should never had been put squarely into Der Movement’s public eye at such a young age. What did the Blacks think would happen if Derek was sent to some sort of leftist college, full of non-Whites? What kind of honest communication was there between father and son that the elder Black ended up being shocked by the betrayal?
The affirmative action label apparently doesn’t stop at Derek. This all becomes all the more tragicomic when one realizes that Don Black was promoting Kemp’s March of the Titans from the very start. Yeah, the Blacks are real “titans” and all that, they really are showing off their racial superiority and Aryan nobility with this whole sordid episode.
One is reminded of The Good Shepherd – a movie Der Movement typically misunderstands (with its onanistic heavy-breathing focus on the Pesci scene). The fictional “Wilson” family, modeled on real-life people, had a hereditary entitlement to the Ivy League, Skull and Bones, and high-level government positions. And the payoff? Three generations contributing to American decline: Generation One – traitor, Generation Two – gross failure, Generation Three – traitor and tragicomically inept incompetent. And then there’s the corrupt “Phillip Allen” who one could imagine in a Der Movement context gambling away supporter’s donations, or using “membership dues” to practice serial monogamy “on the mountaintop.” Not that we know anyone who fits those descriptions, of course. Meanwhile “Tomato Joe” Tommasi was murdered in front of his own house, swindled from him by quota queens who eventually degenerated into esoteric Hitlerism. These things are connected, whether Der Movement wants to believe it or not.