What should we do?
Also read this.
The Quota Queens like to say that their critics do not offer alternative approaches. That is, of course, a bald-faced lie; I have many times outlined strategies and tactics. Here I do so again, with an emphasis on adaption – adapting to the situation your enemy puts you in, challenging that enemy with your own pressure, forcing the enemy to prove that they can adapt to your new tactics, and if they do, then you counter-adapt yourself. Racing the Red Queen. Do things different – the same old story of “education” and “D’Nations” accomplishes nothing except enrich the grifters.
The fact that the enemy may adapt to your new tactics is no reason for not trying those tactics. Quite the opposite. You should take advantage of any opportunity to move into new strategic and tactical niche spaces, and you should force your opponent to prove they can effectively adapt to your new approaches. This is the Red Queen Hypothesis in action. Constant adaption and response to the adaption of others, an evolutionary arms race, is part of the reality of evolved organisms, and it is part of the reality of successful movements as well.
In military history, nations come up with new weapons and tactics, gain an advantage, then see that advantage lost as their opponent adapts and compensates. Then newer weapons and tactics are devised. In sports, a player or a team has an approach, is successful, then must change when the opponent adapts. No one gives up in advance. A nation does not say “Hey, if we come up with an ICBM, our opponent will come up with an anti-ballistic missile system, so what’s the point?” No, they build their missiles, and they FORCE the opposition to prove they can come up with an effective response, at which point the process of adaption and counter-adaption continues. A baseball, player may be unable to hit a curveball, so pitchers feed him a steady diet of curveballs. Either he adapts and learns to hit the curveball, or he’s finished. The pitcher does not say, “Hey, I better not throw curveballs, he may learn to hit them, I’ll just throw fastballs and get hammered.” No, FORCE the other fellow to prove they can adapt, put pressure on him, test him, exhaust him, and if he does adapt, then you counter-adapt in turn.
At some point, it is possible that one side is no longer able to adapt. Species become extinct. Nations are defeated and wiped from the face of history. Baseball players retire when they cannot perform. So it goes. We must FORCE the System to prove it can adapt – after all, that’s what they are doing to us. At some point, one side or the other will reach a breaking point. Better them than us. But if we do nothing, business as usual with no adaption, we are doomed to extinction.
Now, one can make an argument that – rarely – it may be prudent to keep a strategy in reserve for use at the most propitious time, but that should not be an excuse for inaction, for business as usual. To the extent that some aspect of an overarching strategy should be kept in strategic reserve, that’s an issue for high-level discussion and debate (in private, among real leaders, none of which currently exist). Given our current situation, I don’t see that any of the things proposed here should be kept in reserve. These are all obvious and necessary things that need to be done now. Thus:
1. Get out in the real world, the analog world, stop being so dependent on the Internet. I am NOT saying to stop digital activism, of course not. That’s what this blog is, after all. But we are going to have to get back into “meat space,” and do it correctly.
2. Finally, defectives must be eschewed. Finally, we need to stress quality over quantity – not just talk about it, as the Quota Queens like to do, but actually DO IT. I talk about identifying defectives here, and the need for ruthless intolerance here. Is this a person who you would be comfortable associating with in private life? Are they a drug addict? A pervert? A freak? A tin-foil-hat conspiracy theorist? Some bizarre ethnic fetishist? An effeminate? A hedonistic womanizing gamester? Someone with a non-White (usually Asian) spouse? A grifter? A gambler? A hypocrite? A video gamester or porn gobbler, spending all their time indoors, indulging in their vice? How about saying NO to these people?
We should follow the lead of Codreanu and the Legionary Movement. The New Man comes first, THEN we worry about programs and policies. We need BETTER PEOPLE, and then we worry about nitpicking details of ideology. You would think that “race realists” and “eugenicists” would understand the need for better people. The point is, the “better” is not only racial characteristics and IQ – it is basic character more than anything else.
3. A real pro-White movement should be for all Whites. If a group or leader purports to be for “all Whites” – which most do – then they should walk the walk, not just talk the talk. We need an end to the ethnic fetishism and the affirmative action program. All the low hanging fruit of dissatisfied and potentially ethnocentric White ethnics should be picked – and not just for dues-paying stepandfetchits, but as equal and valued members of the endeavor. I realize that Der Movement’s ideology is that the White ethnics are stupid and inferior, and so the supposition is that these people can continue to be hoodwinked, but, no, you can’t fool all of the people all of the time. The sort of intelligent and productive people you would (or should) really want to recruit will soon realize that they are being taken advantage of, being asked to sacrifice for someone else’s interests. That assumes such people are being recruited to begin with, that they are not ignored or actively repulsed.
4. We need a real media presence, our own presence, not to be dependent upon the System. “But we have no money,” the Quota Queens cry. That’s a lie Here’s your money.
5. Get involved in electoral politics. Force the System to become an OVERT banana republic (or like the EU – which is the same thing) and ban political parties, jail opposition candidates, censor political campaigns, etc. Force them to unmask themselves, force them to make it open and plain to White Americans that the System is an oppressive sham. Either the System goes on that path, which in the long term is untenable for stability, or they accept White nationalism in the political arena, which is also untenable for stability. Ultimately, once we get over the rough patches, it is win-win for us, and lose-lose for them, IF done correctly. To be done correctly, see all the other things, discussed above, which also needs to be done. I discussed the political option in more detail previously:
It is one thing to deplatform a blogger or YouTuber. It is one thing to engage in lawfare against cosplayers and their enablers in Charlottesville. It is one thing to label powerless “movement leaders “as “national security threats.” It is one thing to push “hate crime and speech laws” against the atomized Internet lumpenproletariat.
But it is another thing entirely to publicly engage in overt banana republic tactics to shut down political campaigns, persecute political opponents, and censor political candidates. Yes, America is far down the road to leftist victory, yes the System is corrupt and anti-White and degenerate and illegitimate, and yes Whites usually take abuse unlimited without reacting and fighting back. Yes, that is all true. But, still…there are limits to all of that, even now. There are limits to how far the System will go at this time. And I believe those limits fall just short of the System completely unmasking itself, it falls just short of overtly shutting down the political opposition.
Yes, there will be ridicule. Yes, there will be unfair media coverage and smears. Yes, if things are going too well, then they’ll try a media blackout and ignore us. Yes, the System will allow their Antifa hired hands run wild with impunity. But all these things are happening now, are happening already (under the Far-Left God Emperor), so that’s nothing new. If the “movement” is concerned with increased official persecution, then it may be prudent to shift at least some of the activist efforts into an arena in which the System will incur real costs – very serious costs indeed – if they try to censor and directly interfere. And that arena is the political arena – the arena that Joe and Jill Sixpack consider sacrosanct in their faded vision of what America used to be.
If the System wants to shut down White advocacy, then make it as difficult and as painful and as potentially self-destructive for them as possible. Force them into the position in which the only way to shut down White advocacy is to engage in blatant and public banana republic third world authoritarianism, force them to either accept White advocacy in the political arena or risk unmasking themselves to White America several decades too early.
The riposte would be – but, political candidates can be persecuted. Just look at Le Pen in France! My response is that we have to act now, before things get to that point, leveraging the meager First Amendment protections we have left. Yes, if we do nothing now, eventually we’ll reach the point of Europe and well beyond – well beyond because social pricing is worse in the USA, so if we lose the remaining constitutional brakes to leftist tyranny, we will be in fact worse than Europe. Again, that’s why it is imperative to get started now. And, again, the American situation, culture, and traditions of free speech (never mind the legalistic constitutional protections) are quite different than in Europe. What France can do with minimal blowback would result in a rather unpleasant reaction here, even among cowardly omega race White Americans. We may eventually reach the level of France, and worse, but for now, it’s not the same. The cost/benefit ratio for the American System is different from that of France.
The System will adapt to these changes? Maybe. Let them prove it. Let them exhaust themselves doing it. Let them expose themselves as hypocritical mendacious totalitarians to do it. Let them awaken even the most retarded cucked White weaklings to do it. Note to Der Movement: The System has already adapted to all your current tactics – your “shitposting,” your “D’Nations,” your “education” and “metapolitics,” your freakishness, your affirmative action policy, all of it. The Red Queen has passed you by, my friends, passed you by in a speeding automobile while you stay gibbering incoherently on the street corner. In the continuous evolutionary arms race between competing ideologies, the System adapts, and the Far Right – allegedly all about “eugenics” and “biology” and “memes” and “evolution”- stays stagnant, repeating the same mistakes over and over again. The Yang Gang will save us! Come one now, at this point, isn’t it obvious that business as usual is an utter failure? It is a failure for actual activist accomplishment, admittedly not a failure as a money-making enterprise for all of your fearless leaders.