First, I will note for the readership that [posting frequency will have to decrease somewhat here for the time being, due to me being busy with other aspects of life. Hopefully, quality will be maintained.
Second, even though I am busy, I am slowly working on a genetics-related post that requires some data generation at me end, which in turn requires a lot of tedious formatting. I don’t know how long that will take, but stay tuned.
Third, the gamesters are always good for descriptive paradigms about the sexual marketplace; this courtesy of Roissy (emphasis added):
Previous research has indicated that men generally rate slimmer women as more sexually attractive, consistent with the increased morbidity risks associated with even mild abdominal adiposity. To assess the association of women’s waist size with a more tangible measure of perceived sexual attractiveness (as well as reward value for both sexes), we examined the association of women’s age and waist circumference with an index of men’s erectile function (IIEF-5 scores), frequency of penile-vaginal intercourse (PVI), and sexual satisfaction in a representative sample of Czechs (699 men and 715 women) aged 35-65 years. Multivariate analyses indicated that better erectile function scores were independently associated with younger age of self and partner and women’s slimmer waist. PVI frequency was independently associated with women’s younger age and women’s slimmer waist. Sexual satisfaction was independently associated with men’s younger age and slimmer waist for both sexes. Better erectile function, greater PVI frequency, and greater sexual satisfaction were associated with women’s slimmer waist, independently of both sexes’ ages. Possible reasons for the waist effects were discussed, including women’s abdominal body fat decreasing their own desire through neurohormonal mechanisms and decreasing their partner’s desire through evolutionarily-related decreased sexual attractiveness.
Attractive yeastbuckets: erectors
Note at the end that Strom warns against Jewish-influenced “pro-White” groups, and mentions the “Alt Lite.” Very well, Kevin, I agree with you on all of that. But, pray tell, when will you critique the Alt Wrong? You know to whom and what I refer, don’t you? I suspect you may even read this blog from time to time. Don’t you know of pro-Jewish “pro-White” groups and leaders? Don’t you know about the dangers of the pro-Jewish and pro-Asian “HBD race realists?” Don’t you know of entities where fast-talking Jews have promoted the idea of a multiracial “White separatist state?” Don’t you know we’ve been advised to support “the racial status quo?” Don’t you know we’re encouraged to admire – nay, inter-breed with! – Asians? Any comments on that, Kevin? We’re waiting. Do your race a favor, make a distinction between genuine racial science and the HBD cult, and call out the Alt Wrong as the dangerous cul-de-sac that it is.