Genes, genes, genes…
In the past, I was accused of taking DNAPrint too seriously; today, people in and out of the “movement” take today’s testing even more “too seriously.”
That’s laughable. 23andme is just as laughable.
And now for academic population genetics.
More Medish lies!
No, no, a thousand times, no!
No matter how those greaseballs shuck and jive, we all know that this is a Negress, a 100% pure sub-Saharan African, racially perfectly akin to, say, a Nigerian.
Courtesy of (surprise, surprise) TOO’s comments threads.
Nuclear weapons are a Jewish fraud, like the ‘Holocaust’. The important question with Kennedy and other non-Jews was how much they knew of this. (Similarly with Stalin, and Mao). All the discussions about the (((Manhattan))) Project, Hiroshima, Dimona, ‘Samson Option’, Cuba Crisis, (((US ‘atom spies’))), should be examined through the Jewish lies filter. Including: which documents are chosen to be ‘released’, concealed, forged/misrepresented etc.
Those with long memories will recall the novel The Jesus Factor
In the novel, the nuclear attacks of World War II are simulated using aeroplane-mounted magnesium flares and dispersed radionuclides, taking advantage of the destruction caused by an earthquake. An international conspiracy hides this fact in the interest of maintaining nuclear deterrence.
The story concerns events when this status quo is threatened by one of the original bombardiers, who discovers the conspiracy while running for US president with a policy of nuclear disarmament.
Well, why not? Der Movement’s “racial science” and “racial history” read like something from a graphic novel put together by a retarded 10 year old on LSD, so why not use concepts from silly novels to assert that nuclear weapons are a hoax? And, yes, also, the movie Capricorn One is a thinly veiled documentary about the dastardly moon landing (Jewish!) hoax conspiracy (Mars being a transparent proxy for the moon). Dat right!
Actually, the real hoax is that anything resembling a real American racialist movement exists. Is the hoax Jewish? Who knows? They certainly benefit from it. The synergistic relationship between Der Movement and the watchdog groups is certainly something to consider.
Well, when a series on Moorish Spain was running at TOO, I just knew that someone from Der Movement wouldn’t be able to resist commenting that Spaniards (or at least some of them) are mongrelized Moors.
Nowadays there is a strong movement trying to reclaim Andalusia to its moorish legacy, which culturally and racially is pretty strong.
The Arabian African conquest has moved so farther north that Paris now can be considered an outpost of Africa. Even the mayor of Paris is, ethnically speaking, moorish: The very Arab looking Anne Hidalgo, a hardcore leftist from Andalusia.
Curiously even the second part of the author’s name Fernandez-Morera relates to the moors.
Yes sir, even the author under discussion is compromised. since as we all know mulberry bushes are Moorish, hence the connection with the name. And, yes, Hidalgo is quite obviously a Moor, unlike that specimen of pure Aryan manhood, David Bromstad.
Yes sir, it’s all the fault of the Mormon religion! Damn Mormons in Iowa, Ohio, Alaska, and Minnesota! Mormons, Mormons, that’s the ticket!
The newest liberal stupidity.
Similarly, the fact that I was not born the son of Bill Gates means that I unfairly lost the “birth lottery” and, therefore, Mr. Gates is ethically obligated to share his billions with me.
Dear stupid bastard Bergstrom: tribalism has been part of human identity, part of the human experience, since the days that australopithecines and hominids first started walking erect. Tribalism is a form of extended family (hence the validity of my Gates analogy) and the nation (opposed to the state) is an extended version of the tribe-family. It is natural and normal for tribes to form boundaries and exclude other tribes, such is the definition of a group, that it defines itself as much as by what it excludes as by what it includes. And while, philosophically, one cannot derive an “ought” from an “is,” it is equally true that one cannot derive a “not ought” from an “is.” There is no inherent logical reason to reject the adaptive state of nature of tribalism. And, if the state of nature regarding tribalism should not be, according to you, respected by law, tradition, and ethics, then at least be consistent and say the same about family. Go and tell people they are ethically obligated to ignore their own birth children in favor of others – strangers – who were so unfortunate to lose the “birth lottery” and be stuck in less favorable circumstances.
And while you are at it, go tell China and Israel that they are obligated to accept the endless hordes of, say, sub-Saharan Africans who lost the “birth lottery” and didn’t get born in the promised lands of the Levant and East Asia. Never mind all the Arabs who, by dint of correcting the “birth lottery,” belong in Israel, and the various non-Chinese Asians who likewise belong in the Middle Kingdom. Ethics need to be universal, no?