Category: Sweden

Odds and Ends: Behold the Female

And other items.

Behold the female:

Do Chinese women menstruate?  Seriously though, given the enormous genetic distance between Europeans and East Asians (note to Derbyshire), what makes these authors believe that their findings are generalizable?

Men do breast cancer research. Women help the cause in the only manner they are capable.

Resigns in disgrace.  Blames “revenge porn.”  Agency, where art thou?

Evolved to manipulate the male sex drive?  What stage in their cycle were those women flashing their breasts during the World Series? Probably much pre-menopausal female behavior can be ascribed to hormonal fluctuations rather than to rational thinking.

Read this.  Works with a virus.  Refused the vaccination.  Can’t handle a mouse without accidentally injecting herself with the virus.  Can’t remember what strain of virus she was using for the experiments.  I think milady should just stick (no pun intended) to things she can handle – like flashing breasts – and leave the lab work to fully evolved humans (men).

The evil of the XX chromosomes strikes again.  Just like the Carter case.  My explanation? Envy. Just as non-Whites hate, and want to destroy, Whites because of racial envy over inherent White superiority in all things (except for adaptive fitness), so do women hate, and want to destroy, men because of inherent male superiority in all things (except the ability to control sexual urges).  Just like non-Whites leverage White guilt and pathological altruism to exact their racial revenge, so do women leverage their sexuality to destroy men. They do so purposely and with malice aforethought. 

Related to the female issue:

Three take home points from Durocher:

First, he deals with issues that can be construed to be critical of women and the role women play in the West’s decline.  Any snide tweets from Sir Gaslight about this?

Second, his comment about the rise of homosexuals in Der Movement having at least partially to do with their lack of having nagging women around “enforcing social norms” is consistent with my assertion that those same homosexuals have no right to lecture heterosexual men about the place of women in racial activism and in the broader society. Not having to deal with the female in any sort of meaningful personal manner, the homosexual contingent’s input is as “useful” as are the racial comments of (high trust no doubt) SJW Whites who live in all-White areas but who sing the praises of racial diversity (for the rest of us).  By the way, the rise of the homosexual contingent is also due to the intense self-promoting networking their clique has been doing for the past 15-20 years, and their cynically instrumental promotion of certain “movement” dogmas in order to gain increased influence over the great unwashed of rank-and-file activists and over naive (heterosexual) “activist leaders.”

Third, Durocher’s despicable hypocrisy is on display once again when he writes about the “truth hurting” when it comes to biological group differences. This is a guy who only wrote about East Asian admixture in Northern Europe after weeks of ridicule from EGI Notes and then engaged in bizarre hand-waving to convince his readers that said admixture (the extent of which he understated, by the way) is of “great benefit to all humanity.” 

Other items:

Consider Judge Napolitano – that puff-haired Levantine wop whose face looks like it was formed by a spastic child jamming its fingers into a ball of putty. If we assume that Arabic Andy is a man of the Right, we observe a difference between Left and Right.  If a leftist commentator were to (rarely) criticize a liberal Democrat politician, particularly a President, they would criticize from the Left, they would accuse the individual in question of being insufficiently liberal, insufficiently progressive. They would never adopt rightist talking points to attack someone ostensibly on their side.  Rightists on the other hand routinely adopt leftist talking points to publicly criticize rightist political figures. Trump can, and should, be criticized from the Right; instead, “conservative” commentators critique Trump in exactly the same manner as their leftist counterparts. Is it any wonder that the Left always wins?  Of course, in this case, there have been suggestions that Napolitano’s constant sniping at Trump is due to his dago disgruntlement over being passed over for a judicial appointment.  If true, that’s one graceless guinea.

At this point, Der Movement has become a ludicrous caricature of itself.  Is there anyone or anything Swedish that Der Movement is not going to praise, identify with, worship, and be pathologically reticent to criticize in the slightest manner?  Thunberg is an obnoxious little turd, an arrogant flat-faced Ladogan over-flowing with self-satisfied SJW moral posturing, and Der Movement just can’t get enough of her. Forget about jumping the shark, Der Movement has jumped both Moby Dick and the Pequod, and is now hurtling over the Pacific Ocean. All we need now is for Durocher to write an essay describing how Patrik Hermansson is of great benefit to all humanity.  What about Friberg though?  Is that a Swede too far?

Counter-Comments comment about the good and great Greta:

Jud Jackson

Posted October 29, 2019 at 5:34 am | Permalink

Has anybody besides me noticed that she is supposedly 16 years old and yet looks like she has not gone through puberty yet? She looks like she is 11 or 12 at most.

Come now, Jud, don’t you know that those low-hormone k-selected Northeast Asians mature slowly?

Another shallow, superficial Counter-Currents post, the comments for which are better than the post itself. To reduce redundancy: Another Counter-Currents post.

Is this a reference to Pilleater’s revelations about drug use by certain parties at certain racialist meetings, combined with the drunken podcasts from DC-area loft apartments?

I’ll agree that such cliques are destructive.  Other ones are as well.  Pilleater commented on those also.

How Dare You!

The usual suspects.

After TOO runs a series about how “climate change” is a leftist hoax aimed at attacking the technological and industrial basis of the West, the other shoe drops.

Look at that facial expression.  Exactly like Elizabeth Warren. That is the sort of arrogant self-righteousness and moral posturing we all know and despise. What’s next for Thunberg?  Becoming a ship captain and crashing into Italian ports to dump African invaders?  Riding trains into Bulgaria to tear down border fences?

Cue Counter-Currents: We need more youngsters like Greta Thunberg!

Ethno-Williams Syndrome in a picture.

As regards the status of White ethnics in Der Movement, and what they can expect, consider the fate of Joe Tommasi.  Also consider Michael Polignano and Greg Conte.  I do not defend either Polignano or Conte; I am just stating facts. I never had any problem with Polignano. I didn’t like some things he wrote about Salter’s work (e.g.,”genetic stasis”), but I believe that was out of ignorance and not malice.  Conte is a different story, as I view him as a classic shabbos sud stepandfetchit – ready to throw other Italians under the bus so as to get some table scraps from his Quota Queen masters.  Regardless, fact is, both of them were chewed up and spit out by Der Movement; they should, I suppose, consider themselves lucky they haven’t ended up like Tommasi.  Why put yourself through all of that for a “movement” that has racial contempt for you, that will never take you or your interests seriously?  It is literally true that Der Movement values John Lindsay, Hubert Humphrey, and Greta Thunberg more than it values Michael Polignano. Greg Conte, and Joe Tommasi.  Again, I’m not being sarcastic or facetious – that is literally true. So why do you support, and sacrifice yourself for, people who despise you?  Your activist energies would have been better suited to help create a new, truly pan-European, movement.

It seems like Costello agrees with Sallis and disagrees with Johnson:

I would wager very few of those who voted for Trump did so purely for economic reasons. No, Trump’s most important promise was to end illegal immigration. I submit that there is no way Glassner cannot know this. He goes on to gas about “tax cuts,” “de-regulation,” “thousands of new jobs every month,” “the labor market,” protecting “American workers from the unfair trade practices of our economic and geopolitical adversaries,” and “finally holding Beijing to account.”

Now, I don’t doubt that all of this means something to the overwhelming white middle- and working-class Trump base. But it doesn’t mean nearly as much to them as the prospect of taking back their country. In other words: sending back the illegals and stopping new ones from coming in; rolling back the “diversity” that has all but completely destroyed community in our towns and cities; and reversing trends that would make whites a minority in the nation they founded in, say, another twenty-five years…No one is allowed to say that they support Trump because they think he is good for white interests. But it is just beneath the surface.

Gee…what?  White folks voted for Trump because of his promises about immigration?  Because of White interests? Not because of his charming personality? Not that they would have supported him if he “cloned Jeb Bush’s campaign?”

Johnson is such a fundamentally dishonest liar it is comedy at this point.  The joke’s on you, though.

All Hail the Conquering Rescinder

In der news.

In my opinion, this changes nothing.

The hero must have realized he’d lose more through the hemorrhage of fan support than he’d gain by paying danegeld to the ADL.

He’s an immature jerk and anyone who thinks “using him” is going to benefit racial nationalism is a moron.

His initial willingness to pay is more important, and relevant to his character, than his rescinding the donation (and that, under pressure from fans).  Unless of course you’ll claim it is really “4-D chess” – if you believe that, I have a piece of Trump’s border wall I’d like to sell you.

Der Movement: July 9, 2019

In all cases, emphasis added.

Heddi
Replying to @RichardBSpencer
1) Richard, risk involvement reduces the influx of quality people to exactly ZERO. People who have lives/families to shatter by social ostracism or job loss will not ever involve themselves visibly, thus alt right was anonymous online phenomenon.‏

2) The condition to attract quality people – those who do not come from a “nothing to lose anyway” position – is the erasure of risk. How to do it? Marry risk erasure with incentives of heightened prospects of living conditions. Immerse immediate benefits into joining. Think.

Point number one is fairly obvious but very important, and perhaps not obvious to the grand poohbahs who represent themselves as “movement leadership.”  And this is something I’ve written about before, more than once.  

As far as point two goes, I essentially agree, except that “erasure of risk” is unrealistic. There is risk in everything, even driving a car or walking down a flight of stairs. Obviously, involvement in dissident political/metapolitical activity that is opposed by the entire System, by virtually the entire political spectrum, is going to have inherent risk.  Instead, we should talk of “risk management” and “risk minimization” – far more realistic objectives.  That is opposed to the typical “risk maximization” of Der Movement.  As an example of reasonable minimization, see the 2019 Amren meeting; while Unite the Right, the fate of Ricky Vaughn, Hermansson and Lewis infiltrations, IE Discord, and similar antics exemplify risk maximization.

And as far as incentives go – there are none.  Community building? Resistance to social pricing? Alternative infrastructures and economic viability for low-to-medium scale activists (as opposed to the “Happy Penguins” soaking up the “D’Nations”)?  Camaraderie?  Normalcy?  None of that. Instead we see sour defectiveness, bizarre freakishness, and endless failure.

A comparison between the Type I-style and Type II-style “alpha males” is shown in this short clip from Twin Peaks Season 3. Ray Monroe exemplifies the style of alpha maleness prized by the Type I defectives of “game” such as Roissy – a snide, smirking, sneering, joking, obnoxious jackass.  Mr. C, on the other hand, displays a more Type II-style sense of alpha maleness – aggressive, driven, serious, threatening, focused, with the “alphaness” focused with the “want” vs. “need” distinction.  Note how the two interact – Mr C putting Monroe in his place but the latter refusing to acknowledge it other than a begrudging slight nod and semi-grunt, followed by more of the same annoying jerkboy behavior.

This is a useful contrast because it is the Type I behavior that has led to the downfall of the Alt Right and damaged (American) racial nationalism.  All you need to do is listen to (drunken) “movement” podcasts and read “movement” blog posts and comments threads and you’ll observe Ray Monroes aplenty.  Unfortunately, Mr Cs are few and far between, so the snark to seriousness ratio approaches infinity.

The paradigm of “Sallis is always right” extends to my opinion of Durocher, whose latest inane screed can be found here.  Note the Bliss vs. Malla insanity in the comments thread, which is a direct result of Durocher’s constant shilling of an unscientific, ahistorical, cartoonish Ostara-style version of racial history.  Note then the Nutzi Germanic lunatics, the raging defectives, sweaty fetishists, and all the rest.  It’s no coincidence that such freaks come out of the woodwork with a Durocher post.  As they say – garbage in, garbage out.

Once again Sallis is right – remember this:

Some will object – what about Europe?  They have repressive speech codes and aren’t the national governments there considered legitimate by the people?  First, I can’t speak for rightist Europeans – it is very possible that the growth of populism there is indicative of a growing element that does indeed consider the System illegitimate. And, second, the USA, with its particular history of, and alleged commitment to, free speech, is expected to exhibit a much stronger association between free expression and political legitimacy than do nations that have histories of kings, dictators, strongmen, and laws against lese majeste. What about the argument that European nationalists have had success despite the speech codes there?  What success?  In some nations, there has been a temporary slowdown in the degeneration, which can be quickly reversed by any subsequent leftist government; at best, there have been victories by civic nationalists and moderate petty nationalists. The “grand success” in Europe is a figment of the Nutzi imagination. And I can turn the argument around – imagine how much more successful the European Right could be if they could actually express their real views without fear of being fined or jailed?

So, no, the pathetically flimsy “successes” in Europe – which in any case have limited relevance to the American situation – in no way disprove the thesis put forth here.  Given the concerns of White nationalists, the situation in Europe remains dire. Demographic replacement is still “baked into the cake” there. Can European nationalists freely and frankly discuss these concerns?

So, yeah, I’m sure the vaunted Swedish ethnonationalists will go from victory to victory when it is considered a crime to merely state the desire to deport criminal migrants.  

Laugh at this.  Soporific blog posts?

After a hard day of writing inspirational articles for Counter-Currents (under various pennames)

Multiple pennames? If true, that would help explain the devastating decline of quality at that site.

…I mix myself a drink that consists of vodka, soda water, lots of lime juice, and lots of ice.

What is it with Type I Alt Right and drinking alcohol?

A Very Unzian Movement

All Unz, all the time.

From the pro-Asian, anti-White HBD Unz site:

I agree with tamo that the western barbarians stole pretty much everything and then they turned into the most sadistic monstrous conquerors unlike anything we have seen. Now keep blowing their horns about so called discovering things that were discovered or invented thousands of years before them. Heck they didn’t even have indoor toilets until recently while it was there in mohen jo daro 5000 years ago. Now they wear funny klown outfits with a piece of bib and an over coat and act civilised.

Remember Sun Tao? thats taught in all modern military academies? written by some chinese guy 2000 years ago. In india they have native medicines which are more effective than most modern medicines and have been in use for thousands of years. While surgery and invasive process have advanced a lot every year, a lot of that advancement is due to a world wide effort in cooperation and research even if the majority of it is done in like the US which is full of foreigners anyway. The west like the japanese is very good at taking someone else’s invention and taking it up a notch.. Just like taking some guys idea on stealth research and now uses it to create planes that cannot be seen.. And aint that why the west ‘invented’ everything? to steal and call it your own..

Johnson and Durocher write for that site. Never forget that.

Durocher:

Great post!

Of course, the “great post” referred to was one supporting Nordicist theory.  You really didn’t expect anything different, did you?

Generally speaking, I would say a successful ancient state mostly just needs a motivated, competent, and solidary elite. The average level of the masses, who are mostly stuck farming in the countryside, is not so relevant.

Certainly!  Thus, Classical Civilization could have started in sub-Saharan Africa if only the Nordic elite had penetrated that far south. Missed opportunities!  Instead of Julius Caesar crossing the Rubicon and saying “the die is cast,” we could have had Tyrone Carjacker crossing the Nile and saying “I dindu nuffin.”

So indeed, this would fit with the Nordicist model of ancient accomplishment 

Of course it does.  Everything does.

(which I am not committed to, I have not seen conclusive evidence either way).

Of course, “conclusive evidence” against would never be accepted.  Indeed, even when some evidence against exists, Der Movement actually interprets that as evidence for.

The backwardness of the ancient Nords is to my mind easy to understand: low population density, harsh climate, poor communications.

Indeed.  After all, Rome was founded with 50 million people and a high speed Internet connection.  And I thought “harsh climate” prompts time indoors for scholarship?

I don’t think excess individualism was a factor yet. And after all, these barbarians were able to invade and conquer the southerners on a fairly regular basis, from the Celts to the Vikings.

With modern individualism, conquest was impossible, which is why, for example, Hitler’s Germany wasn’t able to ever expand beyond its own borders.

My initial instincts about this Durocher were, of course, correct. 

The Times once published a silly article entitled “The Alt-Right’s Asian Fetish”; Finn obediently lists the alleged “fetish” as a defining trait of the movement.

Uh huh. Read the article in question.  Pay attention to the linked comment by “Karlin” and that quoted from Spencer.  Karlin is – who knows?  But – what about Spencer?  Anglin?  Derbyshire?  Based Stickman?  Pilleater? All figments of our imagination, no doubt. The article was silly, yes, but as the “movement” always likes to remind us, all stereotypes contain a kernel of truth.  Greg Johnson apparently agrees with me:

This is a movement full of anime fanatics, with a fringe of rice burners. Many of them would welcome our new Asian overlord.

Whether “fringe” constitutes a “fetish” is in the eye of the beholder.  And if that beholder is a “movement” “overlord” then expect that eye to have an epicanthic fold.

To borrow a turn of phrase, the burning of Notre Dame is not the beginning of the end, but the end of the beginning. These events open eyes and make the minds of our fellows receptive to the arguments we make.

It’s not an end or a beginning of anything.  Most Whites could care less, and most of the ones who did have a glimmer of caring have already forgotten about it, and are going back to their fast food, sports,and television.

Fetishist:

P.S. Emma Hallberg is unlikely to be 100% ethnically Swedish. My guess is that she probably had a Swedish father who race-mixed with a darker woman who didn’t come from Sweden. Maybe even a Greek or someone from Balkan who was quite dark.

Is that the same father whose picture Hallberg posted to show how “tan” he was?  The truth exposed!  His real surname is Hallbergopolous – a dark, dark, dark Greek immigrant!  Darker than a Nigerian!  Darker than midnight!  Darker than even a S.Italian Afrowop!  You can’t get any darker than that.

Wednesday in Der News

In der news.

This may be the best speech Taylor has ever given (albeit it was not given directly to his intended audience). I urge readers of this blog to spread it around. Taylor has all the makings of a born politician (and I’m praising here, not being sarcastic) and should have run for office – or do so in the future. Despite my areas of disagreement with Amren, I would support such a candidacy.

By the way, if Amren concentrated more on things like this, my areas of disagreement would be minimal.  This is what we need more of, not Asian-worshipping HBD, cheap-shot attacks against White ethnics, and giving a forum to vermin like Hart.

Yes, indeed, let’s have a “hearing” on “White nationalism” in which no White nationalists are invited and, indeed, no persons of European ancestry are even invited to speak.  And we observe a Black woman representing the Right. I mean – can the clownshow of America get any more ludicrous?  And it’s another fail for Der Movement, whose decades of utter failure have led us to this junction of powerlessness, despair, and complete defeat.  Speaking of which…

Pathetic Greg Johnson response to Common Sense Counselor:

CounterCurrentsTV
2 hours ago
One of my readers asked me to reply to this. Basically, I heard someone thinking out loud about my talk and wending his way to the conclusion that no, we should not focus on education as opposed to violence. Instead, he stands for something completely different, namely educating people about just how bad things are for white people — while warning them not to do anything violent. I guess because he is assuming that, no matter how bad things are, we have time to sort them out without violence. Sorry, but I don’t see any fundamental difference between what he said and what I said. I was just a lot clearer. My strong impression is that this guy only half listened to my talk and concluded that I said some very bad things because he has an ax to grind against me. Oh well, I guess I just need to work a little harder.

Wrong (as usual) and self-serving (as usual). I see a huge fundamental difference. CSC is suggesting we be ice-cold honest about the desperate situation we are in, not assert that “yes, things seem a bit bad now, but we are going to win,” always the victory psychosis, always a refusal to face up to “movement” disasters (except when one can blame Spencer and/or Friberg), and always with the tin cup out for panhandling without any actual victories or accomplishments to show for it. CSC is also very clearly calling for action that goes beyond education but falls short of violence – whether I agree with his suggestions or not is a discussion for another day (e.g., rallies and so forth – but boycotts I do agree with), but clearly he’s calling for things apart from folks just posting web articles and selling books and begging for money. I think some folks need to “work a little harder” on their auditory comprehension skills.

It is too bad that CSC answered Johnson in the comments section in a groveling fashion, instead of doing the proper thing, which would be to answer him, directly, in writing, with the same critical force as was used in the original video.  He “doesn’t have an axe to grind” – after essentially stating that Johnson was not fit to be a WN leader.  He also implied that WN “leaders” (like Johnson) sugarcoat reality for their “business model” (rattling the tin cup and selling books).  Which is it?  Is this CSC just too polite?  Does he lack the inner conviction of his beliefs so as to effectively respond when directly challenged by those “leaders” he criticizes?

And, CSC should do a video about the psychological defects and deficiencies behind the repeated Man on White Horse Syndrome humiliations, most recently represented by the Yang Gang fiasco.

I would like to correct any misunderstandings about this post. Without seeing the paper, we cannot say anything about admixture. The paper may very well show admixture in the samples; at this point, we do not know. My point simply is that the fact of changing centroids in and of itself says nothing about admixture. The change could be from admixture, or it could be simply from addition of samples from different ethnies.  You can get gray by mixing white and black paint, or you can get gray be averaging out the colors of separate and distinct cans of white and black paint.  Changing centroids due to admixture would have to be demonstrated by showing that individual samples are admixed, simply averaging the genetics of different unmixed samples is not admixture. Again, at this point, we do not know which of these two possibilities (or a perhaps a bit of both possibilities combined) is correct.  We cannot assume one possibility or the other bases solely on the changing centroids alone.  We not only have to wait for this particular paper, but also to see whether other research groups examine the same samples or, other, similar samples,and generate similar, or different, results..  

I will also note that I have always been agnostic about what the racial provenance of ancient peoples was. I have maintained that the only way to really know is to directly assay ancient remains for their autosomal genetics (and hope those samples are representative of the relevant peoples), and this has heretofore not been done. True, I have always been skeptical about the “movement” narrative, for reasons I have written about over the years, but this has always been a cautious, prudent skepticism, and not any definitive belief. I have always thought that the “evidence” used in the debates has been absurd – “eyeballing” statues, tendentious readings of ancient texts, the work of Frank, etc. .Further, my view was and still is that we need to concentrate on the racial situation today, and in the future, not thousands of years in the past. It was people like Kemp and Pierce and their supporters who were the ones who started the whole acrimonious argument to begin with

An appetizer for the upcoming Roman study:

Results suggest that only 7% of individuals buried at Vagnari were born elsewhere and migrated to Vagnari, while the remaining individuals were either local to Vagnari (58%), or from the southern Italian peninsula (34%). Our results are consistent with the suggestion that Roman Imperial lower‐class populations in southern Italy sustained their numbers through local reproduction measures, and not through large‐scale immigration from outside the Italian peninsula.

Kemp weeps.

Want to read something that shows you where feminist man-hating is heading?  Read Jack Vance’s City of the Chasch in Planet of Adventure, in particular the section on “The Seminary of the Female Mystery.”  Vance being prescient once again – better than the idiot Tolkien and his juvenile fantasies about “orcs.”  By the way, the good guys win in the Vance story, as the men revolt and destroy the Seminary and kill the Priestesses.  Unfortunately, the catalyst for that was a bit of White Knighting, but you can’t have everything.

Roissy:

Trump recently fired Scandicuck DHS secretary Kirstjen Nielsen, because the border had become a slip n’ slide for hundreds of thousands of Central Americans under her watch. Even the enemy media noticed and had to act as if they didn’t report just a few weeks ago that there wasn’t a national emergency at the border.
Trump also did a 180 on legal immigration, recently stating that America “was full” and didn’t need more immigrants, contradicting the enthusiasm for legal immigration he displayed in his SOTU address.
Word has it Stephen Miller (PBU that most righteous and based of specials) is taking over all immigration related policy matters in Trump’s administration.
What gives? Is this more hot air from Trump? Did he get a fright from internal polling? Is he an amnesiac? Is he too lazy to remember his policy proposals from one week to the next and just wants to ride a wave of feelz on whatever banal thought enters his mind? Did Ivanka go on vacation? Did Jared? Did the maturing Barron give his dad a suddenly judgmental gaze and a warning about his legacy? Did Melania finally stop crying over separated beanlets and show Donald the sharp edge of her Outer Hajnal soul?
Did Trump catch an earful from…us? Does vanity preclude me from wondering if dissidents to the prevailing orthodoxy, threatening to abandon Trump for his MAGA betrayals, pulled President Trump back to the essence of Campaign Trump?

No, Roissy, no. It’s like this – Trump is a lazy, stupid, imbecilic, vulgar buffoon, who, literally, believes and promotes whatever was the latest idea whispered in his ear. Before the State of the Union, Jew Kushner and converted Jew Ivanka were doing the whispering, more recently, Jew Miller has been whispering.  Obviously, one has to be either an ethnic Jew, or a converted Jew family member, to be allowed near Trump’s hairy orange ear.  Weasel-faced goys like you (or mick Bannon) are not allowed.

And as regard the moronic HBD Cunt Hajnal crap turds like you continue to peddle, you can only hope that you had an “Outer Hajnal” ethnocentric White as US President, instead of the retarded bloated fat cuck shitheel currently occupying the White House.

Let’s not be too hard on the Swedes.  They wuz Romans, after all.  No, wait…

Sunday Movement Roundup

Race and Der Movement.

“Based” Poland!  Visegrad! Ethnonationalism!

Wrong, wrong, they’re always wrong.

And, hey, I thought that Poles are “ethnocentric ‘Outer Hajnal’ Eastern Europeans.”  What happened? Maybe, just maybe (consider it) all of this “Hajnal line” nonsense is just more HBD flim-flam designed to divide Europeans against each other.  Yes, there are biocultural-behavioral differences among Europeans, but these are gradients, not sharp distinctions.  Poles may be a bit more on the ethnocentric spectrum than, say, Swedes (which is not saying much), but it obviously doesn’t protect them from the blowback from multiracial globalism.  All of this HBD nonsense would never have gone anywhere among racial activists if it wasn’t for the fossilized dogma and ethnic fetishism of the Type I retards of Der Movement. They have a lot to answer for.

One theme here recently is how HBDers try to appeal to Type I ethnic fetishists in order to derail White nationalism.  The emphasis on “David Reich’s data say Aryans invaded India” is one such example – because the word “Aryan” means different things to different people. To legitimate scholars, essentially, the ANI component in modern Indians is from Central Asian steppe people who were most likely more akin to modern Iranians than to anything else.  To Der Movement, it all means “blonde Nordics built the Taj Mahal.”  The HBDers are aware of, and exploit, these differences in perception.  

Spencer criticizes Puritans (who he calls “the worst people of the White race” – “horrible people”) – criticizing a major segment of America’s New England founders.  What’s interesting is that someone like myself who has never made any comments like that was wrongly accused of “bashing the founders” – while I don’t recall anyone criticizing Spencer for actually – and vehemently – doing such bashing.  Those affirmative action protections for “movement leaders” are really airtight, huh?

I agree with Spencer about pessimism being more realistic than airhead optimism. Is the King of Hobbits and the King of Racial Phenotype listening?

Is Spencer’s personal problems making him more Russia-skeptical?

Let’s not stereotype Italians, Richie, it’s not all olive oil.  The relevance of comparing the economies of Russia and Italy is that Russia is much larger than Italy in land mass and population, Russia is resource-rich while Italy is resource-poor, and Russia is a major military power while Italy obviously is not.

I agree with the fellow (Jason I believe his name is) who said non-White anti-White racism is based on envy, and I have written on this before.  And I agree on the description of anti-White Whites as well – intra-racial envy.

It’s all about punishment and revenge.  And the comparison between numbers is true with respect to racial accomplishment.  Compare, for example, some of the swarthoid regions of Europe with China – the former having accomplished more for human progress than the latter despite the latter having 1-2 (or more) orders of magnitude more people.  We can productively enrage the HBDers with this.  I can think of one small area that between the world wars presented to us Evola, Gentile, Majorana, and Pirandello (Cannizzaro died in 1910) – and then we have China, with a population a couple of hundred times larger, which at that time produced who?  Mao?  

I’ll say that overall that was a good podcast and I note that Spencer is behaving somewhat more mature with these people compared to the Alexandria VA-Brewery Boys crowd – until near the end, when he started behaving like a Beavis-and-Butthead Alt Right jackass again.  He almost made it…too bad he couldn’t go the distance. Maybe next time.

The voice of WN 3.0, right Greg? How can we trust Johnson’s judgment?  About the “voices of WN 3.0” or about anything else, including Trump?  At least now Spencer is turning against Trump, while Counter-Currents regaled us about how the mid-term elections were really a win for their tin god, and scolded any of us who thought otherwise.

Nationalism

Allied to this growing militarism was an intense nationalism in most of the Great powers. Weltpolitik or the desire for world power status was very popular in Germany. The French desire for revenge over Alsace and Lorraine was very strong. In Britain Imperialism and support for the Empire was very evident. This nationalism meant that there was little resistance to war in these countries. Many welcomed what they thought would be a short, victorious war. For example the outbreak of war was greeted by cheering crowds in Berlin, Vienna and Paris. As A P J Taylor wrote “the people of Europe leapt willingly into war.”

Durocher:

More importantly, the EU was not in fact the source of Britain’s demographic problems. True, the indigenous English and Celts of Britain are being replaced by virtue of the EU’s free movement of people, but mostly by European migrants. For the most part, these are quite assimilable and hard-working, and represent relative demographic gain…British patriots need to keep their eye on the ball: national sovereignty, good relations with their fellow Europeans, and, above all, keeping Britain British!

So – we will keep “Britain British” by replacing native Britons with Poles and Romanians?

Behold the pathetic loser.  Exchange real-time amnesty for invasive scum in exchange for a “wall” that likely won’t be built or that will be only modestly useful if actually built.  The Quota Kings have more testosterone than does The God Emperor.

We need today what Oliver described as The National Youth Alliance 50 years ago.

While I despise Welton, the following should make all of the “but, but, but…Joan of Arc” white knighters weep:

Males must not be ashamed of being males. The downside of being male is inseparable from the upside: the fact that it is men who have been responsible for pretty much anything of consequence ever accomplished by human race.

A picture for the ethnic fetishists.  All are prime candidates to be let into an “extreme vetted” “movement” meeting.  Especially the one third from left.  He’s from southern Sweden. The far south. Or maybe he’s just a S. Italian immigrant?

Some possible Presidential/Vice-Presidential ticket combinations – all in jest of course:

Spencer/Conte

Spencer/Jorjani

Spencer/Johnson

Johnson/Parrott

Parrott/Heimbach

Duke/Hart

Taylor/Linder

Daniel S/Captain Chaos

McCulloch/Sallis….or…Sallis/McCulloch?

Unfortunately, the Williams/Covington ticket has been derailed by Covington’s death.