Excerpts, emphasis added.
Silver recently at Radix:
silviosilver ✓ᵀʳᵘᵐᵖ ˢᵘᵖᵖᵒʳᵗᵉʳ WHAT • 4 hours ago
As exceedingly idiotic as the multicult west is, it’s still preferable to russkie overlordship.
Silver recently at Amren:
silviosilver ✓ᵀʳᵘᵐᵖ ˢᵘᵖᵖᵒʳᵗᵉʳ John Smith ✓ᵀʳᵘᵐᵖ ˢᵘᵖᵖᵒʳᵗᵉʳ • 2 days ago
I can’t say I’m a fan of Russian-style governance, but goddamit, if that’s what it takes to remove the influence of the complete and utter lunatics who are destroying our countries, then I’ll take Putin any day.
Once again: Silver is a real sanity litmus test for Der Movement and Der Movement “leaders.” Anyone who allows this obvious trolling fraud on their blogs is an idiot.
Something to consider, emphasis added:
F. Roger Devlin
Posted June 15, 2016 at 9:01 pm | Permalink
It is dispiriting to observe how many people can be taken in by disguising partisanship as neutral expertise. Nearly every so-called expert on “right wing extremism” or “white racism” is an example of this.
Your essay puts me in mind of the famous observation of computer programmer Alberto Brandolini that “The amount of energy necessary to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude bigger than to produce it.” By the time you have produced a cogent refutation such as this piece, Timmy will have come up with five more lies or fallacious arguments.
That is why it is important to emphasize that he is demonstrably dishonest. Once you understand the well is poisoned, there is no need to examine every bucketful drawn from it.
Looking at this from another perspective, this is why I believe that blog comments (*), particularly unmoderated ones, are worse than useless – actually destructive. It doesn’t take much effort for idiots, trolls, Nutzis, etc. to spew “bullshit” on a comments section. After which, you have a choice. You can either leave those comments unanswered, which third party observers can see as a tacit admission that those comments are correct or that at least you are unable to mount an effective riposte to them, or you can answer them, expending that “order of magnitude” more energy (and time) doing so. And the time wasted could have been better spent on other things, for example, on new blog posts. Moderation of comments helps, but also takes time and energy.
This is not a free speech issue; if the trolls, idiots, and Nutzis want to set up their own blogs and spew their “bullshit” then they have that right. But freedom of association means that no one is obligated to host the “bullshit” on their own forums. And all the self-described “political soldiers” out there should take their own self-description seriously and consider all of this as memetic warfare, not as a polite debating society.
But, of course, don’t listen to Brandolini – he’s not “one of the boys.” Who cares what that negroid kebab has to say, right?
*But, hey, isn’t Devlin’s comment an example of a useful blog comment? Yes it is, but, putting aside the fact that Counter-Currents has a moderated comments section, we must consider the signal-to-noise ratio. Looking at the entire “movement” blogosphere, for every useful comment, there is a large number of stupid and destructive ones. The best option is for a thoughtful commentator like Devlin to have his own blog.
Taking an updated look at Stimely’s idea.
Stimely: One final question. Supposing that a group of young, relatively young, fascists – not conservatives, not [sneeringly] “populists,” not reformers not people who believe in working evolutionarily within the system, not people who believe at all in saving the system (and who may “work evolutionarily” within it only in order to undermine it) — suppose such a group were to get together and decide to publish their own little journal on the “right,” even in the modest form at first of an 8-page newsletter, entitled Thought & Action, which would be a very nearly explicit fascist theoretical journal working toward the explicit goal of a fascist revolution. Such a journal would explore in the realm of theory the contributions that have been made in political/social thought, and that should be taken into account by present-day revolutionaries, by such as Robert Michels, Vilfredo Pareto, Gaetano Mosca, Georges Sorel, even, Lawrence Dennis, Max Nomad, James Burnham, so many more . . . Yockey, Spengler, Carl Schmitt, Harold Lasswell, other prime thinkers on the subjects of power and revolution and social dynamics . . . and to explore all these things on a fairly high intellectual level. My question is: what is your realistic estimate of the number of people who would either understand, or be at all interested in, such a publication? Thompson:One hundred.
Such a journal would be very useful, but today, it would need to expand its focus to include the Salterian empirical view as well as the more political-social-spiritual “continental existentialist” view as emphasized by Stimely. One could envision that the fusion of those two worldviews (Salter-Yockey) would be a main objective of such a journal.
Some would argue that blogs such as this one as well as Counter-Currents, together with publications such as The Occidental Quarterly (TOQ) fill this role. While those forums do touch on some of the topics I am talking about, what I’m proposing is something more in line with Stimely; a more focused and specialized journal, for fascist/national socialist “revolutionaries” – combining both metapolitics and politics. Such a journal would be not only explicitly (actually, not just “very nearly”) fascist and national socialist, but also explicitly pan-European, Futurist, science based (both hard science and the best of political and social science), with a solid philosophical and epistemological foundation. This would be something for the “hardcore” – not for the run-of-the-mill “latrine flies.” It would not be ‘public” in the free online sense, more of a TOQ format, but perhaps even requiring screening of subscribers, to eliminate infiltrators and trolls as much as possible. The typical “movement” dogma would be eschewed; this would be an attempt for a fresh start, based on the aforementioned key principles, perhaps based on the key fundamentals here.
Majority Rights jumping the shark.
I have previously written about the despicable Silver’s contribution to the destruction of Majority Rights. What’s going on in the rubble of MR land? They have an East Asian female (female – of course) – which, despite the Japanese-sounding anime name may well be that “Chinese Nationalist Maiden” creature haunting pro-White blogs in recent years – making such wonderful contributions such as this:
Siberia is Asian land. Hopefully there will come a day, many decades from now although perhaps not within our lifetimes, when after much attrition the Russian Federation will be sufficiently weakened to the point that it would not be able to mount a defence of that land. And when the daybreak of the Asian Century reaches Siberia, wherever the light from the East is spreading to, all the Russian and Jewish colonialist structures and institutions in those areas will be abolished.
Yeah, that’s great, Asiatrix. However, before you go over to the Derbyshire residence in search of a bit of B and D play (measured groveling!), may I suggest that the following be a prerequisite for any discussion about the racial future of Siberia:
1. All persons of full and part Asian ancestry be removed from the West, regardless of “citizenship” or “place of birth.”
2. The Asiatic world population pays reparations to the European world population to compensate for the damage done to Europeans (including and especially those in the USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand) by Asian colonization of Western nation states.
3. A discussion of how Asians are going to compensate Russians for the investment of human and material capital spent by Russians in the building up of Siberian infrastructure.
4. Mass trials in the future Western ethnostates of Asiaphilic White HBDers, after which the HBDers will be publicly and excruciatingly slowly tortured to death, reduced to shrieking masses of flesh, as their pleas for the mercy of a quick death are drowned out by the joyous cries of vengeance emanating from the vindicated White masses.
In the meantime, other “movement” blogs should consider the costs of tolerating obvious anti-White trolls.