Many people on the Dissident Right voice the opinion that Donald Trump needs to lose in 2020. Trump didn’t build the Wall, he didn’t reduce immigration, he bows before Israel, he passed terrible criminal justice reform, he hasn’t dealt with tech censorship, he shows no concern for persecuted Rightists, he may go to war with Iran, he can’t stop posting cringe, and so on and so forth.
But he’s a man of genuine greatness, and don’t you forget it!
If you think censorship and deplatforming are bad now, just wait until the state pushes it under President Elizabeth Warren.
Cue Counter-Currents articles telling us that we need more women like Elizabeth Warren and Durocher in The Unz Review telling us that Warren is of great benefit for all humanity.
The “Alt Right” became a major phenomenon due to Trump.
Hey! I thought it was the other way around? Didn’t the WN 2.0 heroes of the Alt Right “meme Trump into the Presidency?”
Dissident Right publications and organizations had existed for years prior to Trump, but few paid attention to them.
Journalists and politicians started talking about us when we provided an intellectual basis and online support network to Trumpism. Thousands of people came over to our ideas due to this association. Much of this attention was given in an attempt to derail Trump, but it had the unintended effect of empowering the Dissident Right and making us grow exponentially. We were able to punch above our weight with memetic warfare and by offering online support to the Trump campaign.
The “Trump must lose” crowd insist that censorship is worse under Trump than it ever was under Barack Obama. That’s undoubtedly true, but they forget that it’s increased with the aim of derailing the Trump phenomenon. The President isn’t the one pushing the censorship…
He’s just doing nothing about it.
…it’s major corporations and journalists who want to ensure that Trump is not allowed to enact a nationalist program…
Trump’s nationalist program: Insane delusion.
…and moreover that America never again elects a nationalist.
Again? AGAIN? Counter-Currents is the sewer of WN.
Liberal elites want us silenced because they see us as a threat and acknowledge that our memes helped Trump win.
Oh, there it is. The grand lie of the Alt Right.
The troubles we currently face are our growing pains as a dissident movement.
Having an incompetent affirmative action leadership of freaks, perverts, morons, and grifters has nothing to do with it, no sir!
Arguably, the best reason to want Trump to win reelection is the persecution issue. It’s true that Trump hasn’t done enough on this issue.
Big Tech continues to ban his own supporters and suffer no consequences, even though the President could use his executive powers to hit back. His Department of Justice has also unjustly pursued Right-wingers, such as the Rise Above Movement (RAM), while doing little about the antifa.
But he’s sincere, I tell ya, sincere in his genuine greatness.
You may think this is bad, but it would get a hell of a lot worse under a Democrat. A Democratic president would likely pressure tech companies and banks to deny all service to suspected “White Nationalists.” Association with the Dissident Right could result in the loss of your gun rights under a Democratic president’s new red flag laws. The Department of Justice and Department of Homeland Security would be ordered to make White Nationalism their primary target, and investigate and prosecute many non-violent identitarians.
Note to retard. Even if all this is true – guess what? Trump can only get re-elected once, never mind that he’s old and decrepit. You are going to get a Democrat (or, less likely, an equally bad Neocon Republican) in 2024 if not 2020. Are you prepared? What will you do with four more years of Trump? More drunken podcasts? More feuding? More infiltrated meetings? More homosexual harassment of flabby bisexual activists? More grifting for “D’Nations?”
Not only will the persecution not turn us into martyrs in the eyes of white America, but we won’t have access to the platforms we need to spread our message.
He just said no one is interested in us or our plight, but, by golly, we need dem dere platforms to spread our message! Send in money to Counter-Currents! Remember, those who give live in the Golden Age today!
The Rightists who want a Democratic administration the most will be the first to lose their social media accounts and domain hosting. Nobody can hear your message if you’re offline.
Oh, don’t we know that under Trump.
The only person who might possibly put a stop to tech censorship and bias is Trump.
He has made it clear that he wants to protect online speech and punish tech giants.
Yes, he’s looking into it. He’s looking at it very closely. In fact, he might even tweet about it.
A Republican-sponsored bill exists in the Senate that would target Big Tech’s special immunities and require tech giants to prove that they operate as neutral political forums. If the Republicans win in 2020, they might pass it.
Why didn’t they do it 2016-2018?
Even if you believe that Trump is a total failure, it’s undeniable that he’s the only hope against tech tyranny.
He’s a total failure, but he’ll be successful against Big Tech.
Our movement’s main objectives should be to build communities and institutions.
And to support Greg Johnson’s lifestyle.
A Democratic administration will make those objectives harder to achieve; a second Trump term at least offers the hope that we will gain federal protection.
Federal protection! Counter-Currents – meet padded cell.
A 2020 GOP win should be hoped for solely for this reason. It goes without saying that no Democrat will stand up for our rights.
Rightists who want Trump to lose believe that it would send a message: Trump has failed us so badly that he must be punished at the polls. If you cuck, you lose elections. The problem with this view is that the people who make this argument don’t have a large real-world constituency. There are no Dissident Right organizations of any significant size.
Whose fault is that? Oh, that’s right, the Quota Queens.
Further, they can’t host events, can’t establish institutions, and in many cases they can’t even get along with other people in the same circles…
Doesn’t that very precisely describe Greg Johnson?
Yet, in their minds, they somehow influence the choices of large numbers of voters. This is a fantasy.
There are probably a few thousand wignats, at most, and they are spread out all over the country – too sparsely to make a difference even in the battleground states. Moreover, nobody wants to be associated with our milieu. Republicans have won lots of elections without courting the National Socialist Movement’s votes; why will 2020 be any different?
That paragraph is completely inconsistent with everything else this shallow, juvenile retard wrote in all of the text that preceded it.
Over ninety percent of Republicans approve of Donald Trump – one of the highest numbers in the party’s history. There are no real cracks in his coalition apart from among white suburbanites – a demographic which does not get its news from Gab. If Trump loses, the message the party will take away is that he lost because he was too racist, not because he was too cucked. The party establishment is eager to return to the pre-Trump days and pass an immigration amnesty. Plenty of Republican politicians are more than ready to condemn Trump and his platform if he loses. They will return to the days of George W. Bush and Mitt Romney, and double down on ethnomasochism, neoconservative foreign policy, and economic buffoonery. The GOP will be far worse in a post-Trump landscape.
As I said, what happens in 2024, you short-sighted buffoon?
Ironically, given the wignats’ kneejerk hatred for the man, the only person who could effectively fight back against renewed GOP cuckery is Trump himself. In the event of a loss, he’s likely to return to his 2016 self and blame the party’s establishment. He will insist that he was right about immigration, foreign policy, and trade from the beginning, and push for the party to remain true to his America First promises. Trump would make it his life’s mission to uphold the righteousness of his campaign agenda and attack any who besmirch it. He will still have most of the party’s loyalty, and Republicans will not have the luxury of ignoring him. He’s not just gonna disappear into Mar-a-Lago if he loses.
It won’t be the end of the world if Trump loses, and we will adjust to the new circumstances if that occurs.
Which invalidates the entire essay.
The Dissident Right simply needs to realize that our fortunes are tied to Trump’s, and we would be weaker without him.
Yes, he has done a lousy job of turning our ideas into policy, but no American in recent decades has done more to advance them metapolitically.
Sure! Kanye West and Kim Kardashian make policy, so it’s a metapolitical win!
Immigration restriction, non-interventionism, and economic protectionism are all now part of the Republican mainstream thanks to Trump. More Americans than ever agree with the Dissident Right, and that number will continue to grow if he wins reelection.
They all agree, but, at the same time, they are completely uninterested in us and our plight.
The Republican Party will further adapt itself to Trump’s 2016 campaign message, and neocons and libertarians will feel even more unwelcome in the party.
They can always join the Alt Right.
If you don’t buy that, you should at least understand that Trump and the Republicans are the only ones who will not unleash the full force of the state against us.
We might still deal with tech censorship and deplatforming under President Trump; we never will with a Democrat.
Trump may be too cringey for some to bear, but he’s our only option in 2020. We lose much and gain nothing if he loses.
Didn’t Johnson write that a Trump loss was 100% certain? If so, what’s the purpose of this essay?
Experto crede does not apply here:
Posted October 4, 2019 at 2:31 pm | Permalink
The movie is a text. If you want to assume that certain details are just meaningless accidents, that atrikes me as a lazy way to interpret it. There is obviously aomething wrong in this marriage. So yes, I am going with the idea that two healthy people with one seven-year-child have something aberrent in their marriage. Maybe liberalism is that aberration. But I am going with marital problems.
Thus speaks the expert on male-female heterosexual relationships and marriage. Can he become any more of a buffoon? And he’s getting so excited over this he can’t distinguish “a” from “s” on the computer keyboard.
See this. Zman, being a rather limited commentator, doesn’t bring the discussion to its natural conclusion – once America as a whole dives below 50% White, it is finished. China has to only wait. By then, the Chinese will probably be developed enough, overall, so that their internal consumption can provide the demand for their productive capacity, thus maintaining their economy. A future America, as described, probably won’t have much of a demand for anything except basketballs, bananas, and tacos.
Your disgusting face is an aberration, you Levantine freak. Contra the HBDers, Ginsburg’s entire ethny has a genetic load that makes Adam Pearson look like the Overman.
Speaking of the HuWhite folk. An excellent Strom podcast/essay – albeit disturbing and disgusting. One wonders if the online post that started the “fetish”- or at least the explosion of interest – was genuine, or planted by the usual Levantine suspects in order to trigger sicker self-destruction from parasite-infected Whites. Indeed, one wonders how many “spontaneous” self-destructive fads and fetishes are being planted, intentionally and with malice aforethought, to target Whites, particularly young Whites, with harmful memes. But, hey, the parasites are HuWhite, so it’s all A-OK! Let’s all write some more articles for Unz (question – are those contributions paid?) and it’s all good!
Kevin, when are you going to initiate a full-throated attack on the Judeophilic HBD cult?