Category: Trump

We Already Have De Facto Open Borders

Isn’t it obvious?

Given U.S. obligations under “international asylum law” for “refuges” the following situation holds.  Anyone – literally, anyone – can enter the United States under any pretext, claim to be a “refugee” claiming “asylum,” and the U.S. is legally obligated to allow the person or persons into the country to wait for adjudication of their claim.  And once here, they are very difficult, if not impossible, to remove – as they become integrated into a system of leftist lawyers, activists, judges, and organizations, all supportive of any and all “asylum” claims, no matter how transparently ludicrous.  Indeed, the Left takes the position that anyone entering the country in any manner – including burrowing under barriers, storming fences, violently attacking ICE agents, anything – are legal as long as they claim “asylum.”  And even stupid and useless Third Worlders are realizing this and essentially are all starting to use the “asylum card.”

If the entire population of, say, India, showed up at the US-Mexican border, and started invading – Camp of the Saints style – all claiming to be “refugees” seeking “asylum” then what legal basis would the U.S. have to refuse them?  As long at the United States – and all other majority White nations – stupidly continue to be signees to international, legally-binding treaties on refugee asylum, then there is NO legal rationale for refusal. Anyone, in any numbers, from anywhere, can demand admittance under this treaty and the obligation for acceptance is there.

The ONLY sane response is for the countries targeted by this invasion to leave the treaty.  Instead of “negging” Pelosi or treating college football players to fast food, Trump should be prioritizing issues like this. A televised address on immigration should have included an explanation of the asylum scam, and how it is exploited to transform all illegal immigration into internationally recognized and legalized “asylum seeking” – and he should have demanded that the USA leave the treaty in order to defend its sovereignty and national integrity. Any nation that abides by “international law” on “asylum “for “refuges” effectively has open borders. And open borders is tantamount to national suicide.

Advertisements

Wednesday Weirdness

More “movement.”  In all cases, emphasis added.

What just happened?

Yet Johnson and McCulloch debate on the timing of our eventual victory.  Delusional.

I agree 100% with Taylor here.

Yet Johnson and McCulloch debate on the timing of our eventual victory.  Delusional.

I’ll give credit to Roissy for this:

Heritage America has no representation anymore.
424-1 in favor of condemning those who would entertain the thought that Whites have an identity.
The one nay vote was from a black Dem who thought the resolution didn’t go far enough.
lol america is finished.
The Two Minutes Hate directed against Steve King is symptomatic of a mind disease that has gripped the Western consciousness and won’t let go. Even otherwise normal, level-headed Americans are slave to the illness. What a shame. The craven prostration and groveling is what’s so disgusting about the whole spectacle.
Why do men like Crenshaw bend the knee to a puppet master who mocks them to their faces? Why make a show of his groveling on Twatter? Just vote “cuck” to appease the weasels and move on. Don’t hit up twatter to preen grotesquely about how bad Whites are for noticing their Whiteness.
But the greatest humiliation was reserved for Steve King, who had the temerity to insinuate that Whites are a collective identity with a glorious history of achievement who don’t deserve to be displaced from their own countries by third world rabble. One of those yea votes for the resolution condemning Steve King was from….Steve King.
As symbolism of a dying, weak, self-abasing race goes, that is hard to beat. Steve King condemning Steve King for crimes against the Diversity Orthodoxy he didn’t even commit.

Yet Johnson and McCulloch debate on the timing of our eventual victory.  Delusional.

Oh yes, all the “angels” will fulfill their “destiny.” No, the reality is what we see that happened to King and Watson…all at the same time!

Let’s consider this once again – the destiny-fulfilling angel, the “based” Steve King:

One of those yea votes for the resolution condemning Steve King was from….Steve King.  As symbolism of a dying, weak, self-abasing race goes, that is hard to beat. Steve King condemning Steve King for crimes against the Diversity Orthodoxy he didn’t even commit.

I go back to my old label as Whites as the “leucosa race” – a status even lower than omega.  There simply isn’t any “floor” to White self-abasement and masochistic pitiful weakness and self-destruction.  No floor.  The abyss beckons.

Song for Ted Sallis.

This is the retarded buffoon who has to be pointed out to foreign observers as the President of the United States. 

The Alt Right in one picture.

In general, Spencer sounds credible here, and I have sympathy for his situation, particularly as there are children involved and he is trying to be a father to them. I did read the Huffpost article (Spencer should not have talked to that woman, regardless of the circumstances), which was poorly written.  Look, I do not know the full facts here, maybe he did do some of what he has been accused of – or maybe not; I can only make a preliminary judgment based on what I do know, but the article was outrageously stupid, and clearly demonstrative of the lack of agency (hello, Greg) and insipidness of women.  Yegads!  Spencer was eating a sandwich and had mustard on his face!  Horrors!  Did he have spinach between his teeth as well?  Women have no business being writers or reporters or, really, being much about anything, other than housewives and mothers – if they can even handle that, and many of them cannot.

It’s amusing that the the soon-to-be-ex-wife (henceforth, “ex-wife”) claims she really didn’t know the direction of Spencer’ s politics from the beginning and implies that she was sort of carried along for the ride, while Johnson previously suggested that Spencer “is basically being dominated by Nina Nogoodnik, his Russian-Georgian wife.” 

The hypocrisy over the Spencer ex-wife situation is astounding as well.  The Far Right should reflect over their admiration for Saint Adolf and his ill-fated obsession with his half niece.  The Left should reflect on their lovefest with Saint Martin King and his philandering, womanizing, and plagiarism. The Left justifies this by saying that everyone has “personal flaws” and we should instead focus on King’s “dream.”  Fair enough.  So Spencer has flaws and we should instead focus on his “dream.”

“Alcohol is like throwing gasoline on fire.”  So – no more drunken podcasts?

Who does Spencer think was behind the Huffpost article?  Following the crumbs to where?  Someone in Der Movement?  Who?

And why do so many men in Der Movement have serious problems with their choice of women?  Strom is another one.  Consider MGTOW, guys.

Who can be a vice presidential candidate for Richard Spencer?  Answer: Greg Johnson.

Spencer/Johnson 2020!  A Pepe in every pot and a hobbit in every hole!  To the stars and to the shire! A Eurosiberian Imperium in the capital and de facto anarchy in the provinces!

And Spencer supports being “earnest and serious” and is against “nihilistic humor.”  Is he finally learning?

On the one hand, the call for standards is good, but the mendacious labeling of critics as a “peanut gallery” with “no real lives outside the Internet”  is just ad hominem excuse-making.

The comments about Greg Johnson in the podcast were interesting – as I assume that Johnson would say the same thing in return.  

But…they’re HuWhite!  I urge readers to go to the YouTube video and downvote. And,of course, boycott. These companies need to be held accountable for their behavior.

Again, they’re HuWhite.

Hey, guys, when will YOU oppose the Alt Wrong?  Delenda Est HBD!

“Based” Italy.

And who elected the current German government?

Zman:

The tougher question is what sorts of immigrants would we accept, even in limited numbers. In the Mid-Atlantic, where a large Korean community exists, most people would be fine with Korean immigration. Unlike the Chinese, Koreans are not fleeing political oppression or economic uncertainty. Koreans come here for lifestyle reasons, so they assimilate rapidly. They also take pride in being the model minority, despite what what some lefty advocates claim. Koreans came here to be Americans.

That’s HBD – supporting Asian colonization of the United States, pathetic “measured groveling” to the Altar of Asia, all Asia all the time.

Debased Poland

Der Movement marches on.

“Based” Poland!  Visegrad! Ethnonationalism!

Wrong, wrong, they’re always wrong.

Apparently, the Nazi occupation caused less damage to Poland’s genetic structure than the current reign of “Polish nationalists.”  Leave it to ethnonationalists to impose a genocidal immigration policy on their countrymen.  Another fail for “implicit Whiteness.”

Another fail for mainstreaming as well – even if the mainstreamers achieve power (a rare occurrence) they achieve nothing of value and may very well – such as in Poland’s case – act in a destructive manner. In some ways, this action of Poland’s “based” government is worse than Merkel’s – since, because of the alleged “cultural compatibility” of the Filipinos, they are more likely to interbreed with the natives, compared to the Muslims invited into Germany by Merkel.

All hail the Visegrad group!

Maybe the Poles should get back their people from the UK instead of importing Filipinos.

Durocher, January 13, 2019:

On all this, Darwin and other early evolutionary/racial scientists were ahead of the curve. See for instance the innumerable genetically-determined human adaptations to local environments that have been identified (https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Local-human-adaptations-Following-Fan-et-al-2016-each-adaptation-is-labeled-by-the_fig2_321252816) or the striking correlation between “the shape of the cerebral cortex — the brain’s outer layer of neural tissue — and genetic ancestry” (https://www.labnews.co.uk/news/brain-shape-genetic-ancestry-linked-10-08-2015/). The science indicates that race is ‘only’ cerebral-cortex-deep!

Sallis, November 4, 2018: See here.  

No further comment on that Durocherism.

Answer: Because Trump is a fraud and a vulgar ignorant buffoon, as this blog has been telling you since 2015 – you know, for the last three years that the quota queens have been screeching that “The God Emperor” was “the last chance for White America” and “an American Caesar who was going to stabilize White demographics.”  And, yet, who do you continue to prop up as leaders?

Der Movement has its priorities straight on Trump:

Once again the Beloved God Emperor has proven to be worth more than double his weight in gold. Those tweets are priceless.

All you need to do to be a successful President is tweet like Beavis and Butthead.  Der Movement marches on.

Read this, and remember that Counter-Currents writers now tell us how much they love the GOP. Republican conservatives: Vicious anti-White racist Sarah Jeong good, good, good; mewling cuckservative civic nationalist a bad, bad, bad racist.

Exit Stage Left

More Der Movement.

Trump and the DOJ have all the legal justification they need to act against Antifa. Instead of doing so, they legally persecute the victims of Antifa.

Trump, by his action and inaction, reveals himself to be a de facto radical leftist.

When he is removed from office, either by election or by a successful impeachment trial (or by resignation after impeachment), he will “exit stage left.”

In general, this was a good podcast, but there were a few low points.

Taylor – a self-declared “free market capitalist.”  That’s a dividing line made very clear, isn’t it?  I have stated over the years that I have nothing against the free market in principle, but I do not fetishize it. Tucker Carlson made cogent criticisms of unrestrained predatory capitalism, and I would like to see Taylor comment on Carlson’s economic views.

Kersey – who obviously doesn’t know the difference between an “oxymoron” and a “redundant statement.”

Gavin Newsom – with his “Nordic children.” And – he’s not “light in the loafers.”  Is that – gasp! – a homophobic statement?  I can imagine that the “Mannerbund” faction of Der Movement is not going to like that at all.  Der Movement always likes to talk about the impeding fracturing of the “coalition of the fringes.”  Yes, but the same can be said about Der Movement itself. We all know about the feuds, but it goes deeper than that.

Apparently, there are people in the “movement” who really don’t like homosexuality; others in the “movement” are themselves homosexual.  We have some people in the “movement” who consider Richard Spencer the worst person in human history; others in the “movement” happily associate with Spencer and host him on their podcasts. And those are just two examples of the barely concealed fissures and inconsistencies among people who, on the surface, seem to be part of a broad coalition, but are likely just one argument away from descending into Spencer-Johnson levels of animus. There’s an unstable coalition of the fringes on the Right as well as on the Left.

And, again, this is not “Sallis being a troublemaker” or “Sallis is crazy and bitter.”  This is an issue of ethics and morality, an issue of consistency.  If Joe publicly labels John as an immoral destructive influence, and really believes that, then how can Joe cheerfully collaborate with friends and allies of John?  If Tim believes that “X, Y, Z” is harmful, how can Tim be taken seriously if Tim hobnobs with supporters, promoters, and practitioners of X, Y, Z?  If someone sacrifices moral integrity for political convenience, they then forfeit any right to pose as a “leader.”

And, as Tom Hagen says in The Godfather, it is business, not personal.  I have nothing personally against any of these people, if they do good I praise them, if they reformed I would support them, and if they were in trouble I would help them.  But if you want to be a leader, you have to actually be a leader, not an affirmative action empty suit.  There has to be accountability. Someone has to be out there, a third party observer not involved in “movement” politics and petty feuding over money and status, who can honestly criticize. I know these guys don’t think of it that way, and they do take it personally, but that just demonstrates their weakness.  Instead of fuming over their honest critics, they should thank them.  That they do not realize this demonstrates the validity of my criticism.

Cochran:

It’s that time again, time to contribute. 

The tin cup is rattling.

You can send funds via Paypal, or by check. If you want deductibility, or have something complicated in mind, write to me at gcochran9@comcast.net.  

Did all of the Unz money dry up?

I’ll be reviewing books, talking about this and that, abusing reporters, and working on a weird startup (details to follow).  

Is the start-up organizing the Israeli army to conquer Italy?

Consulting work on algorithm development, GPU programming, miscellaneous software, and estimating your date’s breeding value is welcome.

As long as the date is East Asian, you’re all set.

Why does the Right always have to be an embarrassment?  These guys are not going to attract White STEM activists, and that is a shame, and will in the long run be a costly deficit.

Now, I still support this fellow and his lawsuit, but the optics of all these people are terrible, absolutely terrible.  The only prominent person in Der Movement who, in my opinion, has decent optics is Jared Taylor.  All the others should try to emulate him, re: optics.  Although, true, there also is a place for “firebrand” types – albeit those who are serious, not lulzing jackasses.

Speaking of the lawsuit, while I support it and hope Allen wins, I’m not as optimistic of his chances as are others.  I mean – if you really believe the System is dedicated to White genocide, how can you so blithely assume that facts, logic, and an airtight case actually mean anything?

Now, cases like this should still be done.  The enemy should be confronted, and there is always a chance of getting a relatively honest judge and jury.  Stranger things have happened.  Who knows?  Maybe there will be an out-of-court settlement.  Anything is possible.  Just be prepared for the possibility of a completely outrageous politically-motivated misreading of the actual legal issues at stake here.

A Counter-Currents commentator confirms my skepticism:

The peculiarity of our situation is that our enemy is not Jews and POCs but our fellow-Whites: it is them who vote the establishment into office….

That’s why Johnson and McCulloch are delusional, arguing over when victory will occur.  Better to argue over if.

Counter-Currents writer:

All of John’s criticisms are valid. My knowledge of America is very much derived from books and pop culture.

Then why are you writing essays about an America you know absolutely nothing about?

Sign and Move On

More negativism.

Race and ethnicity as cancer factors.

Some of it may be genetic – hence the Asiatic link between Asians, Amerindians, and Hispanics having relatively low cancer risk factors in America despite differences in culture, lifestyle, and socioeconomic factors.  However, building upon the arguments here, I believe that the anti-White System contributes to Whites being second behind Blacks.  Given the horrific lifestyles, diets, and incredible female obesity among Blacks, it is no surprise they are first, despite being coddled, and catered to, by the Establishment.  But the high White cancer risk fits in well with the whole spectrum of declining White lifespans, the opioid crisis, and other factors reflecting the degeneration of the White position in America.

And the “God Emperor” contributes to this.  Thus: Donald Trump – anti-White, pro-immigration, far left, subhuman animal.

In a tweet, Trump said those who hold the temporary H1-B visas can “rest assured” because changes were coming that will bring “both simplicity and certainty to your stay, including a potential path to citizenship.”

More, more, more Asian cognitive elitists to displace native born White Americans!  Forget about dem dere IT jobs now, Whitey!  Just train your brownster replacement, and humbly prostate yourself before the Altar of Asia!

Hey!  I think we have a shortage of real estate moguls and reality TV personalities.  Let’s bring a bunch in via H1-B visas and give them citizenship.  Why not?

Consider this from Trump’s TV address:

America proudly welcomes millions of lawful immigrants who enrich our society and contribute to our nation.  But all Americans are hurt by uncontrolled, illegal migration.  It strains public resources and drives down jobs and wages.  Among those hardest hit are African Americans and Hispanic Americans.

Thus – illegal aliens who displace African Americans and Hispanic Americans are bad, bad, bad, and we need to stop that.  Legal immigrants from Asia who displace European Americans are good, good, good, and we need more of them.

Is Donald J. Trump the absolute worst person on Earth?

It’s The Woman on Green Pepe Syndrome!

Yahoo commentator:

Chinese are already “easing” into Russia’s depopulated Russian Far East. A treasure house of resources China desperately needs and the Russian’s suicidal demographics is leaving the region wide open. And yet Putin obsesses over the west, which is the least of Russia’s worries and possibly its only salvation.

Is Putin an HBDer?  Or is Derbyshire his advisor?

It is fascinating, but not surprising, that an anti-WN Jew uses the same talking points as the Nordicists. Divide and conquer.

Newsflash to Middle Easterner Podhoretz – it is 2019 and not 1919, and most Americans (unfortunately) even consider Jews to be “White” (although they may have hesitation about the Jews’ minority status and Middle Eastern antecedents).  Given that, does anyone other than “movement” Nutzis consider actual European groups like Italians, Russians, and Central Europeans (Central Europeans!) to be “non-White?”  

Do Americans believe that Antonin Scalia, Natalie Wood, Wayne Gretzky, and Larry Csonka were/are non-White?  Is Podhoretz mad?

And if Russians are “non-White,” then what does Pushkin’s African ancestry matter?  Wouldn’t he be “non-White” even he had been a pure Slav?  This hallux-headed Jew really is stupid and inconsistent, isn’t he?

If you are going to go down that road, then there was a time that the Irish were hated, and Germans as well.  Those are groups that Podjewretz would comfortably put in the “White” category.  So, what’s the point?  Obviously the point is playing the divide and conquer game, a game for which Jews and other anti-White leftists find willing useful idiots in Der Movement.

And, whatever one may think about Berbers, even Stoddard considered them a “White stock” and thought that French-Berber intermarriage in North Africa would cement that area as part of the “White world.”  We do not necessarily have to agree with those sentiments to understand that Berbers are a NEC group much more “White” than “Black” and St. Augustine would likely be considered to be phenotypically “White” if alive today.  Further, there is no strong evidence that Alexander Hamilton had any other ancestry than British and French.  And even if he had trace amounts of non-White ancestry, so what?  Does it mean anything?

Support Glen Allen and Other Issues

In der news.

MacDonald and I are in perfect accord here.

Let’s see.  You can donate to support Allen’s suit, a fight against pure evil:

Beirich, Potok, et al. don’t even pretend to engage in honest debate and the free flow of ideas. Atty. Allen quotes Potok: “We see this [as a] political struggle, right? … I mean, we’re not trying to change anybody’s mind. We’re trying to wreck the groups, and we are very clear in our head, … we are trying to destroy them.” And in this case, the attempt to destroy Allen goes far beyond ethical and legal norms — not surprising given the SPLC’s sordid history of using smear tactics and hypocrisy (Section 31) as well as their dedication to fund-raising far beyond what they actually use to further their causes (Section 27).

Or you can support this.

Your choice.

The current crop of Counter-Currents writers are so bad, so superficial, so mediocre, that they make John Morgan sound like the voice of reason and maturity in comparison. 

Note also how the site is converging onto an Amren-VDARE HBD conservatism position.  Derb snug in his hobbit hole – with Madame “Rosie” throwing him some crumbs if he behaves.  “White advocates” and their “sweet business deals.”  The Brimelows and their tin cup poster children. What a shame.

More on this.

KMacD admits the Trump cheerleading – but where is the accountability?  Spencer is correct that the Republican Party is the major enemy and must be destroyed in order to break the logjam of cul-de-sac stagnation politics.  He is dishonest, or ignorant, when he says we were ALL on the Trump bandwagon, as readers of this blog know full well.  But, his overall instinct here is better than GOP-lover Quinn (see above) at the HBD-Conservative mainstreaming Counter-Currents site. The Sallis Strategy – destroy the cuckservative GOP. I laugh at the delusion of these Alt Righters that they are somehow responsible for Trump’s victory.  It’s exactly the opposite – the Trump campaign energized the idiotic Pepe-Kek brigade.

On the one hand, I agree with some of what Spencer said about optics.  But, on the other hand, his arrogance about his critics is just too much.  Yes, Rich, you are taller and a more successful womanizer than Anglin, better-looking than Weev, and more heroic than Vaughn.  Now, please concentrate on wisdom, maturity, judgment, and persistence, to complete the picture. Also a better understanding of the link between prominence and responsibility/accountability would help as well.

Another thing – according to Greg Johnson, Spencer is a terrible human being, unethical, destructive to the “movement,” etc., and he has no patience for supporters and enablers of Spencer.  So, what does he have to say about Edwards and MacDonald positively engaging Spencer in this podcast?

This is not “Sallis being a troublemaker.”  This is an important question of character and moral ethics.  Consider a group of prominent dissidents.  Person A publicly and repeatedly reviles Person B, attacking B’s morals, character, behavior, and contributions to the cause; Person A also accuses Person B of being involved in personal smears against A.  Thus, A is 100% against B.  Very well.  But then Persons C, D, etc. come in, freely associate with B, give B a platform, and take B seriously as a leader, fully enabling B and what B stands for. Now, what is going to be Person A’s position vis-à-vis Persons C and D, etc.?  Consider further Person A establishing a record of being intolerant of criticism, even from third parties who have no connection whatsoever to Person B.  Is A going to look the other way regarding the B-C-D association?  Is it all “politics” with no ethical considerations involved?  I realize that I may be an overly idealistic, and non-pragmatically apolitical moralpath, but how can anyone take A and his attitude toward B seriously if A ignores all of the above?

I see this as an important issue.  

Sallis right gain: I’ve been saying for years that Trump needs to stop the jackass tweets and do televised addresses.  The good news is that he did it and, surprisingly, didn’t make a total fool of himself.  The bad news is that he, expectedly, did a mediocre job of it.

A very true statement:

China, for example, doesn’t develop weapons; it copies designs stolen from others.

Copy, copy, copy, steal, steal, and steal.  Steal and copy, copy and steal.

But the Chinese can do a lot with that stolen and copied technology, particularly as the West collapses under the weight of “diversity” and moral qualms about using the technology. Further, the West is hobbled by the attitudes of Luddite freaks like Tolkien and all those who fetishize “traditionalism.”

The Zman:

Eric Hoffer made the observation that people involved in causes never reach a point where they say the cause has achieved its goals and therefore can disband and cease its activities. For example, anti-smoking zealots have accomplished all that can be accomplished, yet they persist.

Yes, because as we know, no one smokes any more.  As we know, no one is ever again going to die of smoking-affected disease.  As we know, you can never again have that wonderful experience of walking down the street after someone smoking and be asphyxiated by their noxious fumes.

Is Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez a Racist?

Let us consider this question.

Read this.  Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (henceforth, AOC) calls the Negrophilic leftist Trump a “racist” and engages in nonsensical justification for her accusation.  But is AOC herself a racist against White people?  And does she have the moral right to criticize Trump on racial issues?   I argue the answers to those questions are Yes and No.

First, AOC promotes a dishonest and anti-White narrative about Unite the Right – that “Neo-Nazis murdered a woman.” The violence at Unite the Right was initiated by leftists, who were there to use thug tactics to break up a legally convened rally.  The death in question was the direct result of one individual – Fields – who had no direct connection to the organizers of the rally, and the death – regardless of the politicized jury verdict – was possibly not in any way premeditated, not “murder,” and may in part been due to the pre-existing health problems of the individual killed. Any “Neo-Nazis” present had no intention or desire for violence, and to argue otherwise is so fundamentally dishonest as to constitute grand-scale gaslighting. It also suggests an animus toward White people and specifically an animus against those Whites who defend their racial interests in the same manner that non-Whites such as AOC do for their own people.

Second, and more importantly, AOC supports policies on race and immigration that – by the definitions of the UN Genocide Convention – promotes White genocide.  If one takes the UN Genocide Convention seriously, and applies its standards fairly to all people, there can be no other conclusion than what I have just stated.  If this is so, then it is reasonable to further conclude that any person who supports genocidal policies holds a racial animus against the targeted population.

So – is AOC an anti-White racist?  The only conclusion based on all of the above is Yes.

Does AOC have the moral right to criticize Trump on race? Hardly, if the designation of AOC being a genocidal racist holds.  And there is another reason the answer to this second question must be No. Consider the following. Trump has a history of catering to Black interests – such as with “criminal justice reform” or a pardon for the violent abuser Jack Johnson – and a history of associating with Black racial leaders like Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson. So, AOC, when you establish a history of catering to White interests, and when you establish a history of associating with David Duke and Richard Spencer, then get back to us with your opinions about Trump’s alleged “racism.”  Otherwise, you are nothing but a low rent hypocrite.  And an anti-White racist.