Category: typical Negro behavior

More News in Der News

In der news.  In all cases, emphasis added.

How’s that ethnonationalism working out for you?  Poles out, Brownsters and Blacksters in.

Ted Sallis: Asians pimp out their women for influence in the West (whatever remains of it).

Reality actualized; Sallis correctSee here.

Meanwhile, Der Movement tells us to worship Trump, no wait, Putin, no wait, Reagan, no wait, Princess Tulsi Coconut, no wait, Andy Eggroll (the Yang Gang!), no wait…or, they pontificate about the “deep Asgardian themes” of Shakin’ “Big Red” Stevens.

Sallis:  Always, always right.

Der Movement: Wrong, wrong, they’re always wrong.

Don’t forget to ignore the former and gather around the latter, because, well, you know….

Gather around the Affirm-Act cases: Like Quota King Mudshark Annie.

In Trump We Trust! E Pluribus Awesome!

What a turd this Trump is.  Hey, Antifa Don, do you remember the first two years of your “Presidency” (if you can call it that), when you had a Republican Congress?  How about your recent call for increased immigration?

A question. The proper answer: Ted Sallis has been right about Trump from the very beginning.

Andy with his folk.  Laughing at Whitey willing to sell their posterity for $1000 per month.

Yeah, funny.  Hey, Greg, who was it who was saying that Trump was going to stabilize White demographics? Think real hard now.

While there was some sense here, there was also:

In short, we needed a miracle. Only a god could save us. Or a God Emperor.

MAGA!  Pepe! Kek!

Electing Donald Trump to his first term was just the battle for Helm’s Deep. The battle for Middle Earth is about to begin.

An orc, an orc!  My hobbit hole for an orc!

But even if you are a liberal, your birthright as an American means something to Donald Trump. Try it on for size. It might start meaning something to you too.

Donald Trump promises to bring many changes to American politics, but the most fundamental one is sincerity.

And that time, I was calling Trump a fraud and a buffoon.

Sallis: Always right.

Der Movement: Always wrong.

…and by being pro-American, Trump cannot be against the white majority, whereas the Democrats and mainstream Republicans both promoted policies destructive of the white majority.

Beyond that, Trump’s proposals to build a wall on the Mexican border, deport millions of illegal aliens, and ban Muslim immigration would slow the demographic displacement of whites, giving us a few extra decades before we become a minority in our homeland. We can use that extra time to rally our people and create a consensus around policies that will halt and then reverse our demographic decline.

If Donald Trump is elected, he will slow down the demographic displacement of whites which will make it possible for White Nationalists to salvage the United States and turn it into a white homeland.

Taylor praising the Alt Right here.  Down the memory hole!

Johnson on the Alt Right.  Remember, back then, I was openly criticizing the Alt Right.

Johnson on Trump:

He is the last chance to save America.

All hail the American Caesar!

Remember, I was calling Trump a Negrophilic race cuck and Touchback Trump at that time.

Trump’s immigration policies will definitely slow down the rate of white demographic decline…

Yeah…those of us who were calling Trump a fraud back then are not surprised that he is now calling for increased “legal” immigration.  Can you same the same, Greg?


MAGA! Pepe! Kek!

The Mudshark on Dinesh Penis syndrome.  Will Jef Costello be the White House butler in a Coulter administration?


From failure to failure.  From one wrecked organization to another.  Following in the footsteps of Duke and Spencer.  Affirmative action is as affirmative action does.


So, will Spencer start supporting Johnson for President?  What would be the catchy meme to describe that?  The Greg Dreg?  Not as good as The Yang Gang, I admit.


African space research – no, not an oxymoron!  To the stars (after a pit stop at the local KFC)!

Advertisements

Biden and Der Stupidity

Mocking ridicule is always good for deconstruction.

First – hey, dumb mick-limey-frog Joe Biden, go fuck yourself.

This guy appears at something hosted by Al “Freddy Market Massacre Tawana Brawley Greek Homos” Sharpton, a paragon of justice, and he has the nerve to lecture Whites about their racism?

Maybe Joe, well known for being a buffoon rivaling Trump, can explain something to us. On the one hand, Whites are racists, tormenting the poor Negro. Yet, on the other hand, Negroes clamor to immigrate to majority White nations including the USA, Negroes clamor to move into White neighborhoods, use White institutions, the entire “holiday” you were groveling about was essentially focused on “integrating” Negroes and Whites together.  Does any of this make sense to you?  You must believe that Whites are not racists, Negroes are deranged masochists, and/or Negroes are so utterly incompetent at running their own affairs that they are willing to subject themselves to “White racism” in order to enjoy the fruits of societies that Whites have built – societies that the Negro can only destroy.

We await your response Joe – whenever you are done groping girls.

Second, we have the retarded wopess Milano, queen of plastic surgery, whose career peaked with “Commando” and has been downhill ever since.

Destiny of Angels.  I remember reading someone long ago – it might have been Strom – cautioning against an unrealistic too-positive view of modern Whites, with a cross-section of Walmart customers being a more representative sample of current Whites.

Roissy:

If so, the left wing fad for a meat-free, grain-heavy diet to “save the earth” might wind up making all of us unhealthier, suffering bleeding gums and seizing hearts.

Rewritten:

If so, the gamester wing fad for a grain-free, meat-heavy diet to “be a jackass” might wind up making all of us unhealthier, suffering cancer and seizing bowels.

Seriously though, the Romans ate a carb-heavy diet of grains, fruits, and vegetables, yet had good teeth, because their diet was low in extra sugar (and high in fiber).

Roissy commentator:

Some have suggested fiber is actually bad for you. If you are going to eat plants eat fruit, fruit wants to be eaten, all other plants are poison.

Dat Right!  Dat Dere Broccoli, it be poison!  But that apple, he be begging – “eat me.”

Another idiot listed “olive oil” as a source of fiber.  How about a beefsteak as well?  Candy corn and Mountain Dew will make you real regular!

Then:

Ive gotten two back to back colds since going off low carb diet in over the holidays. Went several years with neither carbs nor colds

Yes sir!  That’s hardcore epidemiology right there!

And then:

I’m fair skinned, cutting grains upped my resistance to sunburns many times over.

Keep it up.  Soon, you’ll be able to walk along the surface of the sun, wearing a tank top and shorts. An experience rich in Vitamin D!

Also:

Jay in DC

As a half wop it greatly pains me that the once bad ass Bobby DeNiro turned out to be a moonbat lefty race cuck faggot. I’m sure his ancestors are rolling in their collective grave.

Well, “Bobby DeNiro” is only a quarter wop, so maybe his racial and social views can be laid on someone else’s doorstep?

Francis Parker Yockey would have been disgusted by Counter-Currents’ shilling for ethnonationalism.

That sound you hear is the HBDers’ weeping.

Executive summary: Der Movement is a pathetic joke, full of freaks, misfits, and morons, and the salvation of the White race will be possible only after Der Movement is completely deconstructed and dismantled, and replaced by a New Movement of rationality, sanity, and vision.  

Delenda est Der Movement.

Friday Follies

Race and Der Movement.  In all cases, emphasis added.

The average reader may not know this, but Hela cells are often a big problem in the biomedical cell culture laboratory environment – the cells are aggressive and invasive (surprise!), resulting in significant cross-contamination of other, more unique and valuable, cell cultures.

However, 20 years after Henrietta Lacks’ death, mounting evidence suggested that HeLa cells contaminated and overgrew other cell lines. Cultures, supposedly of tissues such as breast cancer or mouse, proved to be HeLa cells. We describe the history behind the development of HeLa cells, including the first published description of Ms Lacks’ autopsy, and the cell culture contamination that resulted.

Many labs therefore want nothing to do with that cell line, in order to preserve the integrity – dare we say “purity?”- of their other cell culture stocks. Interesting analogies can be made to other, broader, societal, situations.

Good news.

I have two points to make about this.

First, we should not be surprised that Fukuyama preaches to Whites memes that will inevitably lead to their destruction.  As EGI Notes tells you time and time again: The existential meaning of Asians is hatred of Whites. 

Second, we see Greg once again engaging in the most outrageous and dishonest gaslighting – this time trying to convince you that WWI and WWII were not due to petty ethnonationalism, but a lack thereof.

You see, “WWI was not a war of nations, but of empires.” The empires did it!  It were all the South Asians of India, the Algerians of North Africa, the Egyptians, the Negroes of German South West Africa, the Siberians – they were the ones pushing the honest and humble ethnonationalists of Great Britain, France, the Turkish Ottomans, Germans, and Russians into war. It had nothing at all to do with the rise of German power, the British desire to thwart that power, French fear and hatred of Germany, Russia’s desire for power and influence and their ethnosubracial pan-Slavism, no sir!  It was dem dere empires dat done it, lordy yes!

At this point, the ethnonationalist riposte would be: Austria-Hungary!  Empire!  The Archduke!  The Serbs!  Empire caused the war!  

Does anyone really believe that the underlying cause of WWI was the assassination of some useless aristocratic parasite?  No – the great powers of Europe, which did NOT include the “sick men” of Austria-Hungary and the Ottomans – were primed for war, wanted war – because of their selfish, petty nationalist (or subracial-ethnic-cultural-petty nationalist in the case of Russia) interests. The young Europeans who cheered for war and volunteered in droves in 1914 did not do so because of “empire” or because of “the Archduke.” They did so out of national pride and because of a petty nationalist animus toward their fellow Europeans.

Therefore, the assassination was merely an excuse. The Austrian tail did not wag the German dog; the Serbian tail did not wag the Russian dog, and the British and French didn’t care one whit about “national determination” (they were “empires,” no?).  It was all an excuse for a petty nationalist war that was not caused by empires but that ultimately caused the end of those empires.

And, oh, yes, WWII occurred “because the ethnic boundaries were not properly drawn after WWI.” Right? Very good.  By that logic, Greg, your Saint Adolf should have stopped after uniting with Austria and getting the German part of Czechoslovakia.  Or are you going to tell us the invasion of Poland was really about the “Polish corridor?”  Yeah…and I have a bridge to sell you connecting Manhattan and Brooklyn. Hitler had his lebensraum aims that were completely ethnonationalist, or at least Germanic/Nordicist. Hitler wanted land from the Slavs and wanted revenge against the French. There was also an honest fear and loathing of Soviet communism – although that didn’t stop the Nazi-Soviet pact to destroy Poland.  The British were playing their usual game of preventing a continental power from emerging, and, again, the French feared and hated the Germans. And it was the petty nationalism of the British and French that prevented a pan-European alliance with Germany and Italy to destroy Soviet communism. The USSR had its own agenda, both of power politics and Marxist expansionism. Tell me – where in all of this was the war being caused by pan-European ideals?  By multi-national states?  And the only real link to “empire” here was the German (and Italian and Japanese) national desire for empire.  And did Great Britain fight the war “to save the empire?”  Hardly.  Hitler was willing to guarantee the existence of the British Empire, which he admired.  The British just wanted to destroy Hitler and Nazi Germany.  The same old “grand strategy” of Great Britain – which lost them their empire and resulted in the homeland being reverse colonized by the Third World.  Ethnonationalism!  Snug in your hobbit hole!

The facts – the clear historical facts – demonstrate that petty nationalism, ethnonationalism, caused both World Wars and wrecked the White World, and to argue otherwise, and to try and shift the blame to the opponents of petty nationalism, is an even greater act of outrageously despicable dishonesty than the previous Gaslighting Greg act of blaming the failure of WN 2.0 on those who eschewed and opposed WN 2.0.

I have no idea what happened to this guy Johnson; I think his hatred of Richard Spencer has unhinged his mind.

A commentator responds to Johnson:

Now, while I strongly believe in the practical value of ethnic homogeneity this is not always feasible. Also a myriad of small but homogeneous states without a certain supra-national structure will render them indefensible against the Asian Empires – Russia and China! And these two do know how to genocide. So again, an effete bureaucrat of EU Commission is a better choice (and probably the only one acceptable currently) in order to maintain the peace between not perfectly homogeneous states but also to prevent the Asian Empires expansion in Europe.
This structure was working in a certain degree until Angela Merkel blown it up by opening unilaterally the borders of Germany.
My hope is for a Union of all white peoples (Europe, US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and South Africa and a proper part of South America) each people living in its own state based on its historical right (defined genetically and culturally), but organized in a supra national white states entity; expulsion of all non-European populations and individuals, including the mixed race individuals. Common defense, common positions regarding the rest of the world. Free internal markets. Free circulation of ideas and goods. Limited people circulation.

That’s OK as far as it goes, but he should have critiqued Johnson’s initial premises.  For an ethnonationalist to blame WWI and WWII on “empires” and “multi-national states” is chutzpah of an order to make Dershowitz proud.  It’s disgusting.

Then we have the vile hypocrite Roissy, who laments this story, while he has previously bragged about one of his girlfriends offering “do you want to put it in my ass?”  I guess the blowback from the unbridled nihilistic sexual hedonism the gamesters preach is not always to their liking.  Then we have the hypocrisy of “game” advocates always throwing their “Christianity” in our face, as if their lifestyle is in any way even remotely compatible with even the most modern dilution of authentic Christian belief.  I can honestly say that in my entire life I have never met even one genuine Christian; as Nietzsche wrote – there was only one Christian and he died on the cross.

“Based” Tulsi.  Gee…the Woman on Green Pepe Syndrome hit a snag real fast, eh?

Wrong, wrong, they’re always wrong.

Leftist lies on race, this from The NY Times, a racist media outlet who hired White-hating genocidal Asian bigot (or, more simply – “Asian”) Sarah Jeong:

People who live in a place today often bear no genetic resemblance to people who lived there thousands of years ago, so the idea that something in your blood makes you meaningfully Spanish is absurd.

Hmm… is that why Otzi the Iceman is genetically most similar to modern Europeans?  Is that why ancient DNA analyses typically puts those samples closest to their modern day counterparts than to, say, people halfway across the globe?  How about a bet?  I’d say that the genomes of ancient Britons are genetically more similar to the modern English than they are to, say, Nigerians.  If I’m wrong, I’ll admit it right here.  If I’m right, the author of the NY Times piece will agree to resign his position and get a swastika tattooed on his forehead.  Fair bet?

It’s all in the Genes

Plain facts.  Excerpts presented. Emphasis added.

Establishment Lie:

Environment is everything; nurture (or lack of it) is the key.

Truth:

Now, one of the country’s top psychologists and behavioural geneticists, Professor Robert Plomin, of King’s College London, offers an emphatic conclusion.

It is drawn from 45 years of research and hundreds of studies. He says the single most important factor in each and every one of us — the very essence of our individuality — is our genetic make-up, our DNA.

The basic building blocks of life that we inherit from our parents are what determine who we are — not how much they loved us, read us books or which school they sent us to.

And this, by extension, must also apply to ethnic and racial differences.  All the societal manipulations in the world won’t make a Negro into a Dane.

DNA accounts for at least half the variance in people’s psychological traits, much more than any other single factor. Put simply, ‘nature’ trumps ‘nurture’ every time, and not just marginally, but by a long, long chalk.

Our DNA, fixed and unchangeable, determines whether we have a predisposition not just to physical traits — from how tall we are to how much we weigh — but also to our intelligence and our psychology, from a tendency to depression to having resilience and grit. 

Plomin’s revolutionary conclusion — outlined in a challenging and thought-provoking new book, Blueprint: How DNA Makes Us Who We Are — is a game-changer, he claims, with far-reaching implications for psychology and for society.

Chicago-born Plomin’s startling conclusions come from two of his long-term studies. Over the course of 40 years, he tracked 250 adopted children in Colorado along with the birth parents who gave them their genes, and the adoptive parents who raised them. After moving to London in 1994, he launched a 20-year study of more than 12,000 pairs of twins.

From these studies, it was possible to unravel the relative importance of genes as opposed to environment when it came to their development.

Millions of pieces of data were amassed from the parents, teachers and the children themselves, about psychological traits such as hyperactivity and inattention, talents such as school achievement and the ability to learn languages, and physical characteristics, such as the propensity to put on weight and become obese.

From all this, he found overwhelming evidence that adopted children are similar to their birth parents, not the parents who raised them. Identical twins (ie, from a single egg and therefore with the same DNA) develop much more similarly to each other as compared with non-identical twins (from separate eggs and with different DNA). 

The conclusion was clear — DNA makes us who we are. In the long term, the environment you grow up in has little impact on the way you turn out.

In fact, what really matters in such situations is our genes, because it is our genes that determine how well or badly an individual deals with such setbacks. And whether we’re resilient to life’s catastrophes or cave in is determined by our DNA, too.

Why shouldn’t the same apply to population groups?

In fact, Plomin argues, there are genetic influences in virtually everything we do. Those differences determine how we perceive and interpret the world we grow up in, and how we modify our behaviour accordingly.

As his research developed over the years, Plomin was taken by surprise by the all-pervasiveness of genetic influences he discovered in almost every aspect of human behaviour — even down to being a nice person or not.

Altruism, caring and kindness are components of what personality researchers call ‘agreeableness’, and for years it seemed logical to him that these traits had to be the result of the environment we live in and the influence of those around us.

But his research showed this was not the case. Being nice is also something in our DNA. The same goes for grit and determination. Nurture and example do not teach some children to be tougher than others, their genes do.

Consider differences between population groups in these traits.  Sorry, you cannot cherry pick and only apply these findings to atomized individuals.

All this leads Plomin to a conclusion that is hard to take: the family, he tells us, far from being the monolithic determinant of who we are, the bedrock from which we learn and grow, actually makes little difference to our personalities and the way we turn out.

The same applies to societies and races.

‘Each child is their own person genetically. We need to recognise and respect their genetic differences. If we go against the grain, we run the risk of damaging our relationship with them.’

Let’s rewrite:

Each race is their own population genetically. We need to recognise and respect their genetic differences. If we go against the grain, we run the risk of damaging our relationship with them – and risk damaging ourselves trying to fight Mother Nature.

Schools, he says, matter in that they teach basic skills such as literacy and numeracy. They also dispense fundamental information about history, science, maths and culture. But choice of school makes very little difference to a child’s achievement.

‘Genetics is by far the major source of individual differences in school achievement.’

As any multiracial society should be aware.

The same principle applies in the debate about private and state schools. If, as Plomin claims, schools have little effect on individual differences in achievement, then those 7 per cent of parents who pay huge sums to send their children to private schools in the belief that it will give them an advantage may well be wasting their cash.

Plomin writes: ‘Expensive schooling cannot survive a cost–benefit analysis on the basis of school achievement itself.’ 

If your genes fit, you’ll do well; and, if they don’t, no amount of cash can change the abilities you’re born with.

Negroes don’t perform badly because their schools are “bad.”  Their schools are bad because they’re the students in them.

Not that the influence of our DNA is confined to our early years when we’re growing up.

Indeed, Plomin shows that it gets stronger as we get older. More and more, we revert to type. Yes, other factors impact on us, such as our relationships with partners, children and friends, our jobs and interests. All contribute to give life meaning.

Which is why “Head Start” gains and other nonsense dissipate over time.

The same applies to anyone with a genetic propensity to depression, learning disabilities or alcohol abuse.

‘Genes are not destiny,’ says Plomin. You don’t have to succumb.

Perhaps, but you have limited options to change course, dependent upon your genetic blueprint.

It’s also good, he argues, that we can know our limits — those things that our DNA just won’t let happen, however hard we try.

Plomin quotes with approval the observation of American comedian W.C. Fields: ‘If at first you don’t succeed, try, try again. Then quit. There’s no use being a damn fool about it.’

Can we then give up attempting equal outcomes on the basis of race?

Plomin’s radical new world may force us to bow to our genetic limits but, on the plus side, it will encourage us, like Alastair Cook, to do the best we can with the talents we’ve been given.

Some folks can land on the moon, others can layup basketballs.  It’s all in the genes.

Three implications of this story:

1. The predictive value of gene pool to phenotype correlations will be greater for populations than for families, since the intra-family variability in phenotypic expression – due to the “meiotic lottery” – would tend to be averaged out over the millions of people making up typical ethnies.  Thus, one could more reliably predict phenotypic expression from the allele frequencies in the genepool when considering (large) populations.

2. Significant and long-term improvements in various psychometric performances would require genetic change – and the most rapid and directed approach to achieve this change (other than futuristic gene editing) would be via eugenics.

3. This all underscores the mendacity of globalist shills who tell us that people who lose their jobs due to free trade, outsourcing, immigration, and automation can simply be “educated” and “retrained” to perform the more challenging, information-based “jobs of the future.”  No, that middle-aged coal miner is not going to become the next Bill Gates or Elon Musk (and, besides, some of these “advanced jobs” will themselves be eventually lost to the same processes that have hollowed out the American [blue collar] working class and middle class).

Is Recycling Racist?

Disparate impact against Whites.

Many years ago, living in a particular urban area, I noted that the regulations for recycling were getting ever more onerous, superfluously – almost (?) maliciously – complex, and I then noted who was and was not jumping through the hoops to follow those regulations.

Blacks and Hispanics would (literally) throw garbage in the streets or on the sidewalks (and would do so even if standing right next to an empty trash bin); they wouldn’t even follow the minimal rules for regular trash, much less follow excessively complicated recycling regulations.  Lazy and corrupt Asians would produce suspiciously little recyclable waste in proportion to their rates of consumption – likely they would just put most, if not all, of their recyclables into the regular trash (but at least they handled regular trash correctly).  What Jews did as a group I do not know, but it is clear that from what I observed, only Whites were consistently following recycling regulations; thus, based on the theory of “disparate impact,” recycling  is clearly racist against Whites, particularly when the rules of regulations are design in an almost (?) spiteful manner.

Until such time that all racial groups are made to follow the same rules and regulations, unnecessarily onerous rules and regulations that are followed only by one racial group should be viewed as a racially pernicious attack against that group.

Behold the Negro, 7/10/18

Two stories.  

First, read this, emphasis added:

At a timeout late in his team’s victory over Chicago’s Raw Athletics on Sunday morning, Houston Raptors coach Bobby Benjamin sensed that an already contentious basketball game might soon turn violent.

The opposing team had become increasingly frustrated at its inability to cut into a double-digit deficit, so Benjamin warned his players to be prepared to exit the floor without shaking hands at the final buzzer rather than risk potential fisticuffs.

“Their players started fighting amongst each other and they were arguing with their coach,” Benjamin said. “That’s when I knew it was about to get bad. I figured if they’re going to fight with each other, they might be willing to fight anybody.”

Proof that Benjamin was right to be worried arrived a few minutes later when an otherwise typical grassroots basketball game devolved into a series of wild brawls between Raw Athletics players and the referees. Raw Athletics players threw a flurry of punches at one referee during the mayhem and surrounded him as he lay prone on the court. The same players also tackled another referee to the floor after he sprinted over from an adjacent court in an attempt to intervene.

Then, watch this.

An innate tendency toward violence.  Now, SJWs will chime in and talk about “White mass shooters” or “millions dead in White wars” (thanks, ethnonationalists).  But we see differences here.  Mass shooters are a very rare occurrence; all races have unstable outliers among their population.  All races fight wars as well, although one would expect that the better organized, more disciplined, and more technically competent races would result in wars that are more destructive.  Some races use trained mass armies, tanks, and bombers and others use spears.  Naturally, the death toll of the wars of the former will be greater than that of the latter.  War is a natural human condition.  Violence is as well, but it is the nature of Negro violence that separates it from that of Whites and some other races.  Negro violence is very spontaneous, uncontrolled, mindlessly lashing out over the most trivial reasons.  And not only is Negro violence differently qualitatively but also quantitatively – compare rates of violent crime between racial groups.

Think about it.  You hear that players attack referees at a basketball game.  Did you have any doubt as to the racial provenance of the players?  A video clip of a traffic light road rage incident – by female attackers no less and with one wielding a baton – did you think they would be anything other than Negro?

Most honest people have an innate sense that a large fraction of the Negro population are on a hair-trigger, ready to engage in violence for the slightest reason – or sometimes, no reason at all.  That’s a difference: while all races have rare outliers that exhibit hair-trigger violent outbursts, in the Negro race, such volatile and dangerous individuals make up a very significant fraction of the population, so much so that one is justified viewing the typical member of that race with prudent suspicion.


As to mechanisms?  Likely differences in brain structure and function, levels of neurotransmitters and hormones, and how all those physiological factors interact to respond to environmental stimuli.  The evolutionary explanation has already been given by others many times, to summarize: in the Negro’s tropical homeland, food is plentiful year-round, there’s no winter to speak of and seasonal variation is mostly the amount of rain that falls, yet there are predators, diseases, and parasites galore.  Thus, there was little or no adaptive value for prudent foresight, self-control, planning, and discipline. On the other hand, being impulsive to take advantage of opportunities, a readiness for instant violence against predators, and a r-selected lifestyle to make up for losses due to diseases and parasites – that was all adaptive.

Pastor Manning

Amusing.

Pastor Manning is certainly an interesting Negro, and if the main Negro leaders were more like him, perhaps some real progress towards racial separation could be achieved.

That said, this has to rank among the more amusing YouTube videos out there.