Category: typical Negro behavior

A New Definition of Random

The System gaslights as much as the “movement.”

See this.

Let’s see.  A Negro attacks “people” and with one of the attacks “anti-White statements” were made.  It is reported as “random” attacks on “people” by an unidentified “man.”  

Der System, Der System, Der System marches on.

Advertisements

Donald Trump and Greg Johnson

A tale of two hypocrites.

Ted Cruz is an infinitely better man that the walking pile of feces Antifa Don Trump.

Since literally the first day of President Trump’s term, the federal government has done very little to prevent leftist political violence. Now, there are attacks on law enforcement officials, cheered on by a nationwide network. What did the DOJ think would happen after years of tolerating lawlessness?

A government is the monopoly of force within a territory. If President Trump’s DOJ refuses at least to investigate antifa in the wake of Van Spronson’s attack, it has ceded that monopoly. Already, President Trump has proven himself unable or unwilling to enforce America’s immigration laws. Now, he seems indifferent to attacks on public servants. Rather than tweeting, he should act. Tolerate political violence and it will escalate. This attack is surely a harbinger of more. If President Trump won’t defend immigration law enforcement officials, they won’t defend America.

The Trump administration has not installed a single mile of new wall in a previously fenceless part of the U.S.-Mexico border in the 30 months since President Trump assumed office, despite his campaign promise to construct a “big beautiful wall.”

Roissy is back online.  Is he going to be man enough to admit how majestically wrong he’s been about Fat Donnie?

This here may be one of the most hypocritical and dishonest things Johnson has ever written. Yes, principles are more important than people, so even though HBDers themselves expose Rushton as a fraud and a hypocrite, Johnson defends him because he was his “friend.”

Now let’s apply this analysis to the question of how White Nationalists should approach the Trump question. Consider, for instance, Trump’s tweets inviting an America-hating Muslim, Somali-born Representative Ilhan Omar, to go back to her home country.

The broad-minded approach is to use this controversy to talk about ideas. 

I agree. I talk about the idea that Der Movement is an utter failure, as exemplified by its repeated Man on White Horse humiliations, and Trump is an excellent example to use to illustrate this point to the rank-and file.

The small-minded approach is to use this controversy to talk about people. For instance, Richard Spencer appeared briefly on CNN. Instead of talking about the issues raised by this debate…

And so Johnson hypocritically uses the CNN controversy to once again personally bash Spencer.  Calm down Greg and think about someone else for a moment.

The basic Spencer code is to denigrate his natural base while preening as big-brained…

Unlike Johnson, of course.

 …and grandstanding to the Left. A comic genius described it as glitter bombing. Sadly, it doesn’t leave much time to talk about ideas.

Such as the idea of endlessly obsessing over Richard Spencer.

It does not occur to them that nobody need support Trump the man—in part or in toto—to use him as an occasion to defend good ideas and attack bad ones.

Attacking bad ideas – like the Man on White Horse Syndrome or Der Movement’s ethnic affirmative action policy, both of which are relevant to the author of the piece I am now critiquing.

And if Trump is only an occasion to enter the battle of ideas, then it does not matter if he means what he says, or whether he will follow through with his proposals. Obviously, we’d like Trump to be a sincere and effective advocate for pro-white policies. 

But if that is our constituency, then our movement has no future.

It doesn’t have a future.

Those who are playing a long game…

Snug in their hobbit hole.

…recognize that the nearly 60 million white Americans who voted for Donald Trump are the natural constituency for National Populism in America. The most important thing is to uphold the right principles and communicate them to the National Populist electorate that Trump has created and is increasingly disappointing and frustrating. When Trump is gone, it is our job to lead them. 

These guys can’t even lead a tiny “movement” but they will lead “nearly 60 million white Americans” to victory.

But we cannot lead them if we do not connect with them. And we cannot connect with them if we go out of our way to alienate them.

Yes, you will connect with them, and not alienate them, by running hyper-Nordicist screeds by the likes of Ash Donaldson, combined with other esoteric content of Counter-Currents. I thought Counter-Currents was aimed at the “high-IQ crowd” and not to “the nearly 60 million white Americans who voted for Donald Trump?”  

As far as White Nationalists were concerned, this was never just about Trump. It was always about advancing our ideas. 

Trump was always just an occasion for White Nationalists to enter the political debate. 

And they didn’t do it. Instead, they engaged in MAGA Pepe Kek hysteria, did Unite the Right, engaged in catty feuds, panhandled for “D’Nations,” and did navel-gazing podcasts.

He smashed the Republican gentleman’s agreement never to talk about whether global trade and non-white immigration are good for America. It was truly magnificent.

Yes, talk about “big hands” combined with total ignorance during debates was truly magnificent.

Trump asked the right questions…

Such as “where is the nearest MacDonald’s?”

…but at best, his answers were half-measures, and half-implemented half-measures are not the solutions Americans need. They are not what his electorate is increasingly clamoring for. But that too is an opportunity for us.

An opportunity to endorse Andy Eggroll. No, wait, Princess Tulsi Coconut, no wait….

I think some of the spoiled child reactions to Trump’s failures and betrayals come from people who somehow convinced themselves that Trump really was going to save America. 

” people who somehow convinced themselves that Trump really was going to save America” – like Greg Johnson, Richard Spencer, Richard McCulloch, Jared Taylor, Kevin MacDonald, and Roissy.

But that was never realistic. He was one man, advocating confused civic nationalist half-measures against the whole media and political establishment. Trump was never going to save America. 

And, again, the post linked here contains some of Johnson’s hysterical Man on White Horse Syndrome comments about Trump two-to-three years ago. 

That was always our job. It still is.

Pure delusion. 

Trump is not the last chance for National Populism in America. 

Tell that to Amren and The Occidental Observer.

He is just the beginning. He was not the last chance for white America. 

Why didn’t Johnson tell that to Taylor and MacDonald back in 2016?  20-20 hindsight three years too late?

He was the system’s last chance to preserve itself in the face of massive demographic change. When Trump is no longer President, our mantra must be “Trumpism has not failed. Trumpism has never been tried.” 

Boy, that’s inspiring!

Only then we will start calling it National Populism, and if we play the long game, we will have created a whole new political movement to secure its triumph.

These guys can’t even hold a small meeting without it being infiltrated but they’re going to build the grand political movement that will secure for us our – inevitable of course! – triumph.  National Populism –  brought to you by preening elitists who sniff about “Kali Yuga” and Guenon.

The bad news is that Trump turned out to be better at campaigning than governing. The good news is that he will soon go back on the campaign trail, and if “Send her back” is any indication, it’s going to be another magnificent opportunity to move the national mind in our direction. 

Like the grand success of 2016, which has led America to be farther to the left, and more anti-WN, than ever before.

When that time comes, I hope our best propagandists will not sit it out, sulking in their tents like Achilles.

Or sulking like male meeting attendees who failed in their flirting with Pilleater.

If we are going to effectively advance our ideas, we cannot get distracted by the politics of personality…

Including hatred of Spencer?

…including our own personal issues. 

Projection?

We must never lose sight of our ultimate aim, which is a homeland for whites in North America.

A snug hobbit hole for every White American!  A caliper for every skull!

Johnson’s essay is one part hypocrisy and two parts dishonesty.

Hypocrisy: We must concentrate on ideas, not people – except of course when we defend the likes of Rushton out of friendship and constantly attack Richard Spencer out of some obsessive animus. Never mind that when someone too sharply criticizes his own ideas at his blog, the response is “this will be your last comment here.”

Dishonesty: First, by ignoring the fact that Johnson and his buddies were indeed engaging in God Emperor Pepe MAGA Kek hysteria about Trump and, more importantly, second, that pointed criticism of Trump as a fraud does not have to be a “small-minded” interest in “people not ideas,” but rather a principled argument against the endlessly repeated Man on White Horse Syndrome error, and also an argument that the same “movement” that makes that (obvious) mistake over and over again is unfit to be a vehicle for White preservationism.

Other news:

1969: America lands men on the moon

2019: We have this.  Racial harmony!

See this. While I have some degree of skepticism toward such tests (can they detect psychopaths? Can someone be trained to defeat them?) And while they are not 100% accurate, something is better than nothing, and perhaps such tests can be one component (not the whole thing!) of a real “extreme vetting” program, at least for more important positions. One wonders also if “random screening” should be done even after acceptance, since people who may originally be sincere, can “turn” later.  Also, in the case of a real infiltrator, if they somehow bypassed the test on the first go around, where they may have been prepared for it, on a second, unexpected, random screening, they may be caught.  The screening itself needs to be done by different people and double-checked – what if the screener is an infiltrator as well?

Race and Movement News, 7/13/19

In der news.

Another good Taylor video. I had to laugh about the “warpath” part.

Excerpts from another “emotional nerve” comment left at the HBD “West Coast White nationalist” Counter-Currents site,  emphasis added:

The problem is, aside from cattiness, that they always feel the need to bring up Greeks (ancient only, for they know not a thing about any other era, and really, they know very little of even the ancient ones), Italians (they are ESPECIALLY and GLEEFULLY brutal to Italians), Spaniards/Portuguese, etc. Why not just leave it out and just STFU about them? You cannot prove your point with repeating lies about meds (or slavs)???? Really, you can’t?

“……….Pan-Europeanism is our only way out.”

It can’t work BECAUSE of this BS.

@Ash
“I seem to have struck an emotional nerve with you and a few others.”

Typical response really. When a repeater of nordypoo nonsense is called out, always surprised that meds dare to take their own side in a fight, there is talk of “emotion.” But my dear, dear Ash, there was no need to repeat that lie. The whole post could’ve been done without that usual, tired, jealous jab. I understand that nordies feel put upon and cowed by non-whites and anti-white propaganda; but they always try to pump themselves up by ripping on meds and slavs, who played no part in that propaganda, do not attack nordies at all and are not anti-nordy….so WTF?????? Such catty swipes seem to be currency in these circles.

I agree with all of that, and it is good some folks have answered the original inane post. Certainly, the fetishists have a particular sweaty animus toward (Southern) Italians – to them, several rungs below Negroes and Australian Aboriginals on the racial scale.  And the indirect allusion to Sallis’ Law is always correct – Der Movement will always bring up their attacks against Southern (and Eastern) Europeans regardless of the context. If “Ash Donaldson” wrote an article about the weather, or the price of milk, or the design attributes of the Atlas ICBM, or whatever…there would have to be the obligatory mention of admixture in Southern (and/or Eastern) Europe. What self-respecting “movement” post would be without it?

And I agree, pan-Europeanism is not going to work as long as there are people who openly lie about racial history and population genetics to fuel their obsessive dogma, which they proselytize with all the fervor of a crazed priest of the Spanish Inquisition or a modern-day cultist.

We’ve certainly come a long way since the days of Larry Scott, eh?

Di, Di, Di…versiteeee…..

We’ve certainly come a long way since the days of Christy Mathewson, eh?

Di, Di, Di…versiteeee…

Reagan, Spencer, and Dutton, Oh My!

In der news.

Watch this.  Now, I’ve criticized Reagan as one of the original Man on White Horse frauds, and his domestic policy was a complete betrayal of his voters.  Essentially, to the extent he was sincere about any of it (Who knows?  Maybe like Trump, the divorced and remarried Hollywood Reagan was as much an insincere fraud as New York values Antifa Don Trump), he sacrificed his domestic agenda to achieve his foreign policy and defense spending goals.  Let’s put that aside for the moment, and just concentrate on the ability to fulfill the obligations of being a President of the United States – acting the role (Reagan was an actor, after all), and representing yourself, your nation, and your ideals (even if insincere) before the world. Compare Reagan’s televised address linked to above with the behavior of Trump.  How would Trump have responded in a similar situation?  Several blustering tweets, written as if by a brain-addled ten year old?  Speeches about how George Washington’s army conquered airports?  Comments about his “big hands?”  What?  

Actually, Reagan was the last President who was in any way truly Presidential.  Bush Sr. was a whining elitist with no charisma, a man who – despite his war record of physical courage – had no moral courage at all.  Clinton was a disgusting pig and a transparent carnival barker. Bush Jr. was almost as big a vulgar retard as Trump.  Obama, given a free pass because of his race, was an empty suit, a cipher who thought that reading off of a teleprompter with his chin elevated would compensate for his total lack of substance.  What a complete disgrace.  Oh, for the days of Milliard Fillmore!

Very cognitive, very elite. Colored is as colored does.  If a Negro did this, the HBDers would be up in arms; but as regards this, it is move on, move on, there’s nothing to see here.

Colored is as colored does.  Black, Brown, Yellow, Red – what’s the difference?

Is there a point to this, other than Spencer confirming himself as a Type I jackass?  I don’t know, me, I’d rather mock someone for a failing they have control over – for example, running the Alt Right into the ground despite all of the opportunities presented by the post-2016 world – rather than for a failing they do not have control over – for example, being short.  I could be wrong about this, of course, so perhaps a drunken podcast or two can clear up this issue for me.

Do the HBDers support HR1044?

Race Denial Incoherence

And other news.

Denier:  There is no such thing as race!  It is merely a social construct with no biological basis!

Realist: Then how do you distinguish those nasty privileged White racists from those nice and humble oppressed Blacks, whose lives, as we are told, matter ever so much?

Denier: Look, there are some people who happen to have dark skin and others who happen to have light skin – and that’s the only difference between them – and the former are placed in a “Black” socially constructed group that is victimized, and the former band together as a socially constructed privileged “White” oppressor group.

Realist: So the only difference is the skin color of these groups, a mere superficial element?  No other similarities within and differences between the groups?

Denier: That’s right.

Realist:  But there are people from, say, South Asia, who have skin as dark or darker than many Black Americans, and there are some people from, say, Northeast Asia, who have skin as light or lighter than many White Americans. So are Koreans and Japanese privileged Whites who are oppressing Black Indians and Bangladeshis?

Denier: No!  When I talk about “Whites” I mean, you know, Whites, and “Blacks” mean Blacks.  You know what I mean.

Realist: No, I don’t know what you mean.  Please explain.

Denier:  I mean that “Whites” are relatively lighter-skinned people of European descent who look like Europeans, while Blacks are relatively darker-skinned people who have African ancestry and look like people from sub-Saharan Africa.

Realist: So these “socially constructed” groups are based on people who look somewhat similar to each other and who derive from particular continents – continental population groups?

Denier: They are ethnicities, not races!

Realist: Putting aside that your “ethnicities” are based on continent of origin and physical appearance that goes beyond mere skin color, I ask – are English, Germans, Italians, Greeks, and Russians all the same ethnic group?

Denier: Whatever. Those are socially constructed groups – part of the “White” social construct.

Realist:  Again – are they all the same ethnic group?

Denier: No.

Realist:  So, we have different ethnic groups that are binned together because they look approximately similar and originate from the same continent.  Population genetics will show similarities at that level as well, in a global context.  Obviously then, this group of “Whites” – which we can call a race – has a biological basis and is not merely some sort of social construct.

Denier:  You’re a racist!  You should get elbowed in the face just like Richard Spencer!

This demonstrates the problem with ancestry testing companies.  Assume European ethny “X” that has some Siberian/East Asian admixture.  A testing company has “X” as one of its parental populations, well represented in their database, and as part of their “European” category.  A person of “X” ancestry – someone who has the same Siberian/East Asian admixture – gets tested, and since they match the “X” parentals, they get a result of “100% X,” which the company interprets as “100% European.” In this manner, the Siberian/East Asian admixture is hidden, because it is part of “X” ancestry and “X” is a “European parental population.” The individual, who may well look like they should be eating with chopsticks, goes on Amren comments threads to pontificate on their “racial purity.”

Now, you may argue that if “X” is an indigenous European ethny, and if the admixture took place long ago as part of the ethnogenesis of “X,” then it is fair to call all “X” ancestry as “European.”  Very well, but then you have to accord the same status to the ethnogenesis of other European ethnies, including the cringing subhumans from the South.

Just in time to fool the rubes in 2020.  The Republican playbook: Campaign Right, Govern Left.

So much winning!  Never fear!  Trump is monitoring the situation, monitoring very closely

It is staggering that all of the heroes of Der Movement (with a few exceptions) did not realize early on that Trump was a fraud and a buffoon.  With respect to being a fraud, we have all of the evidence: His Jewish family connections, his fondness for Negroes, his socially liberal “New York values,” and his past support for leftist Democrats. As for being a buffoon, his debate performances were clear indication of that; for example, his clownish ignorance when asked about America’s nuclear triad strategic deterrent (of which he clearly knew nothing), compared to his great interest in talking about the size of his hands.  Why did anyone take this fat retard seriously?

He won the election because many White Americans were desperately hungry for red meat right-wing populism, and were heartily tired of the GOP Establishment and the non-choice of elections. They took Trumpian rhetoric at face value. I supported his election because it was obvious that Trumpsim was accelerating the breakdown of America and disrupting the multicultural consensus. I also stupidly (or naively) thought that Der Movement would be able to take advantage of Trumpism to further the promotion of explicitly White interests. I should have known better; that foolishness is to my eternal shame.

Just like Derbyshire – someone with a sense of entitlement who believes that their entire social milieu should change to accommodate their (wrong) life choices.

It is also amusing to see stereotypes conformed – the huge White whale has a Black “husband.”  White fatties and Negroes – who would have ever guessed?  All that’s missing from this picture is a bucket of fried chicken and Captain Ahab.

Odds and Ends, 6/5/19

Several items.

Meet Julius Evola.

Giulio Cesare Evola was born in Rome. The parents of Giulio Cesare Evola were Vincenzo Evola, born 4 May 1854, and Concetta Mangiapane, born 15 August 1865. They were both born in Cinisi, a small town and municipality in the Province of Palermo in the north-western coast of Sicily.

As well as “the Philosopher of Fascism.”

Giovanni Gentile was born in Castelvetrano, Sicily.

Anyone remember Negro Thomas Sowell’s pontification that Southern Italians had nothing to do with Fascism?  Just like the HBDers, non-Whites always like to lie in order to divide Europeans against each other.  Non-White HBDers are the worst.

And is Der Movement going to officially revoke Julius Evola’s “Traditionalist Hero” membership card?  How can the Type I Traditionalists continue to value the work of that Negro?

Radical leftist Antifa Don Trump and his neo-Marxist DOJ defeated.

A degenerate Negro.

Traditionalism meets astronomy!  

getgetgetgotgotgot
2 months ago
What is the esoteric meaning of Aldebaran?
Jackson
Jackson
1 month ago
It’s the origin of the Aryan people at least the ones remaining on earth, who fled civil decay and started the civilization of mankind that fell around 8-12,000 years ago. Their descendants are still here today. However they are not originally from here. The lore goes back some of the oldest historians as well as occult histories. Namely works such as “The Race to Come” is inspired by such works. Maria Orsic etc. Etc. Theres to much to cover.

What about Antares or Betelgeuse?  Rigel?  Is Ultima Thule in the Canopus system?  The Aryans of Archernar!

This is where Der Movement’s Quota Queen “leadership” will bring us.

Joan of Arc!  Greg Johnson weeps.

Even More Winning

Endless losing.

The two things I bothered to listen to here was the Anarcho-Tyranny airport incident and about the Derbyshire Yellow Supremacist speech.

The major point not mentioned in regard to Anarcho-Tyranny is that this harassment of people on the Right is taking place under the regime of The God Emperor Trump. Johnson’s “sincere” Trump, the avatar of White demographics, is presiding over a Radical Left Dystopia in which WNs are persecuted by his DOJ, banned from traveling, harassed, deplatforming, physically attacked in the streets, etc. Don’t ever admit that you were wrong, Greg, you wouldn’t want to mar your impressive record of zero self-awareness and zero accountability.

About the “remarkably witty” Derbyshire, at least they have it right that Derbyshire’s talk had “the least amount of substance” and that Derbyshire’s “Arctic Alliance” “sounds like his marriage” and that they are confused about “what is the purpose” of it all.  Johnson is correct that Derbyshire is an “IQ supremacist and cognitive elitist” – and further, that cognitive elitism is extremely dangerous in that high-IQ immigrants are more of a danger for displacing natives and for miscegenation (the HBD plan).

Johnson is wrong that Asian immigration is a “small demographic problem” – China has long been one of the leading sources of legal immigration to the US; Korea provides many invaders as well.

Derbyshire “wasted a slot” – blame Taylor for that.

Morgan’s anti-pan-Europeanism is disgusting and hypocritical. Can you please leave Hungary, since you are not an ethnic Hungarian?  Anglo-Saxons are not quite ethnically and culturally congruent with Hungarians from the ethnonationalist perspective you espouse. Of course, as I’ve talked about in the past, when these guys talk about ethnonationalism they really mean ethnocolonialism. Morgan living in someone else’s nation while pontificating about the virtues of narrow ethnonationalism; Munro living in Romania with sexual access to a Romanian woman (“wife”) while telling us how horrid Romanians are, Farrell living in Italy with sexual access to his Italian “wife” while shaking his head sadly at woppish ineptitude, Deasy visiting Bulgaria and regaling us with the deficiencies of Bulgarians and how their faces “take getting used to.” You see, our betters will live among us like feudal lords, telling us how bad it will be for there to be any political equity and cooperation among our peoples. Sort of like those British who love Brexit but who for some reason move to Spain, southern France, Bulgaria, Italy, Greece, etc. while “Commonwealth” Negroes and Pakis flood into the UK (as long as it is not Poles, A-OK).

So much winning.

A bit of Negritude.

More and more winning.