Category: UK

More Silk Road News

More anti-Silkism.

More over-sensitive Asians.  Colored is as colored does.

Realities of Jews and China and the Chinese threat to the White race (emphasis added):

…to demonstrate the vicious, dangerous and ruthless nature of today’s China and its determination to spare no means in order to realize its dream for global dominance and to bring the White western people to its collective knees in the process…while China is actively and vigorously employing the “subversive divide and conquer strategy” among other crafty means on its adversaries, those at the receiving end of the Chinese stratagems are actually not awakened enough to the scenario and certainly not repaying China with the same means, at least far inadequately. On the contrary, China has been consistently favored and shielded and subsidized by the Jew directed Western political and economic establishment on the both sides of the Atlantic Ocean.

Of course, the Silkers say we need to grovel to Chinese power, let the Chinese colonize White lands, and have Chinese girls with guns enforcing the borders of the West.  Madness, sheer madness.

Here’s another wonderfully productive and patriotic “British Asian” helping the UK be more “resilient,” don’t you know.   Cue the Silkers posting pictures of anime figures proudly standing by the Union Jack.  All hail dat dere British civic nationalism!  Just stay out of the doctor’s office…

Advertisements

Alt Right and Silk Road News: Madness and More Shoe Dropping

Complete madness.

Well, well, well… ignoring the typical juvenile jackassery, the key point is the declaration that the Alt Lite is the enemy and must be opposed…and “obliterated.”  Well, I can’t argue with Spencer there (*), but I do wonder whether he includes the VDARE/Amren crowd on his “Alt Lite enemies list.”

Hmmm…who was it who was denouncing the Alt Lite months ago and telling the Alt Right that the “big tent” was a mistake?  Who was it who termed “Alt Wrong” to describe the HBD-enriched Alt Lite faction?  You know who it was the person who has been right over and over and over again.  The dreaded “crazy” and “bitter” Ted Sallis.

My judgment is literally months ahead of the so-called “movement” “leadership.”  Who should you trust, dear reader?  The person who is consistently right and who can foretell these “movement” outcomes long in advance, or the folks who belatedly realize the obvious many months after?

My current long-term prediction (which may be wishful thinking I know) is that this whole Alt Right scene won’t last as it is.  The feuding will continue, current allies will have falling outs, unsavory details will be revealed (more than what has already occurred), people will tire of juvenile jackassery and social media memes as a substitute for actual ideological content, and some of the more mature Alt Righters will shift their focus elsewhere. Unfortunately, this will take some time to unfold, likely years – with possible “ups” and “successes” in the interval to boost Alt Right egos past their already overinflated points – and the ultimate damage to racial nationalism will be considerable.  By putting most of its eggs in the Alt Right basket, Der Movement is going to see most of those eggs do a “Humpty Dumpty” – perhaps later than sooner, but eventually.

Any intelligent person should, of course, find all of this quite tiresome. All this back and forth over who invited or didn’t invite or disinvited who sounds like Mean Girls high school birthday party drama.

Indeed.

And the best case alternative explanation for Wåg’s article that a defender of Friberg could give — indeed I think the only alternative which accords with the rest of the facts as we now unequivocally know them — is that someone close enough to Friberg to have caught wind of his original lies about Greg’s role in the Scandza Forum’s invitations—very quickly after they were made—must have been the source. As far as I can tell, this is literally the only other possibility—and yet, no one has come forward, or been suggested as the possible source by Friberg himself.

So which is more likely: that Friberg lied regarding the Scandza Forum in attempt at a Machiavellian political maneuver and engaged in other forms of sabotage against its organizers (as has been confirmed by Filmersson), and then also leaked his version of events to Wåg, someone we know he had at least a degree of contact with…

The Alt Right is complete madness.

More Kumiko, emphasis in original:

Regarding forced repatriation of Asian people because we disagree with you on stuff, there is one card that Asians have in the deck to prevent that. The upper class. The richest Asians will buy off your legislature in order to avert that possibility. I’m the only person who is willing to tell you it in such straight language!

This is incredible.  The Silker shoes (black boots?) are dropping on an everyday basis.  The Whites on MR are absolute race traitors if they do not denounce all of this and apologize to the racial nationalist community for their piss-poor judgment and yellow fever fetishism for allowing this creature to run rampant there. This childish Asiatrix doesn’t even keep track of her own inconsistencies.  First she asserts that the Far-Right wants authoritarian police states, then she threatens that rich Asians will buy off our “legislatures” to prevent repatriation.  Oh…a Far-Right authoritarian police state is going to have “legislatures” with political hacks getting paid off by diseased aliens.  Sure, makes sense.  Also amusing is the idea that the reason for repatriation is that “we disagree…on stuff.”  NO, IT IS BECAUSE YOU ARE A COMPLETE GENETIC AND CULTURAL ALIEN.

And once again, Ted Sallis is right: Silk Road White nationalism is enforced Asian imperialism and Asian colonization of White lands (and White nationalist blogs); you are not allowed to get rid of Asians, don’t you know, they’re here to stay!  The “majority” in Majority Rights is obviously the majority of China, Japan, Korea, all of East Asia – indeed all of Asia as a whole.  Asians uber alles!

Told you so.

And MR are not the only ones at fault.  Other people, who know better, gave this creature a forum, and applauded her juvenile scribbling, because her comments were useful ammunition against Spencer’s “Big Europe” ideas.  

Two words to describe Der Movement: bad judgment.

Roissy claims that “women are anti-civilizational.”  I agree. But, perhaps, then we shouldn’t promote a lifestyle that asserts that men need to ever-so-carefully calibrate their every thought, word, and action to appeal to the hypergamous instincts of ditzy females?


The incredible stupid bastard and homoerotic Trump fanboy Roissy somehow believes that a “Congressional Picnic” is more important than Der Touchback giving de facto amnesty to “Dreamers.”   The “game” faction of the Alt Right is probably the most childishly moronic part of it – and that’s really saying something.

*Actually, that’s about what I think about the Alt Right itself.

Silk Road News: The Other Shoe Drops

This just does not make any sense whatsoever.

In all cases, emphasis added. From Majority Rights:

Kumiko Oumae works in the defence and security sector in the UK. Her opinions here are entirely her own.


How many Japanese females work in “the defence and security sector in the UK?”  Why would such a person, who has participated in what the System would label “a racist and extremist blog,” publicly declare their work in that System itself?  Does this make any sense on the face of it?  Imagine an anti-Semitic Nigerian blogger who openly declares they “work in the defence and security sector in Iceland.”  If the self-description was true, would such a declaration make any sense whatsoever?  Wouldn’t any sane and sincere blogger keep their System affiliation secret?

And then we have Majority Rights having a self-proclaimed deep state (non-White) worker involved in their ostensibly “dissident, nationalist” blog.  We’ll be told it’s good to have “moles infiltrating the system.”  Yes, indeed, when such are of your own race, of the native stock, keep their infiltration secret, and, more to the point, what kind of genuine mole publicly announces the fact of their infiltration?  Nothing here passes the “smell test.” 

And then we have her openly declaring her enmity to the White men at Alt Right.com and again openly declaring working for the “defence sector” – 

Kumiko Oumae  JLawrence • 2 hours ago

Not interested in being productive for you in any sense. I’m the enemy, silly. The comments I make here are mostly for my own amusement, and to get a gauge on what you think.

If I were interested in actually helping anything, my behaviour would be completely different.

Also, regarding men having to ask or not ask. I work in the defence sector. I’m part of that thing which you refer to as ‘in power’. This is part of why your smugness has no real effect on me. This whole conversation is a farce. The fact that you have a penis does not place you above me, and it never will.

– again someone who writes for an alleged “nationalist blog” and who tosses around terms like “motherfucking Jews” is a Japanese woman who works in the “defence sector” in the UK, and repeatedly open declares that fact.

If I’m the only one who thinks something here doesn’t add up, then Der Movement is infinitely more moronically dense and imbecilic-scatter-brained than I ever imagined.

Twin Stupidities: “White Sharia” and Ethnonationalism

Against “White Sharia” and the ethnonationalists.

Stop judging me, “movement.”

I’m bringing up this amusing (but true) post again, which is relevant to some of the points I make below.

“White Sharia” – juvenile jackassery that only the Alt Right could produce. Put me down as a misogynist who believes in patriarchy and who also believes that snarky memes derived from alien cultures are utterly moronic. “White Sharia” violates Sallis’ Shiv: “movement” freakishness should not be multiplied beyond necessity.

By the way, AltRight.com probably needs to deal with the SiteLock problem. I’m assuming they’re aware of it; if not, they are now.  I know some of them read this blog. Some of your readers can’t access your site – at least the ones who don’t change their VPN settings.

Speaking of that site, it’s amusing how the ethnonationalist retards are getting their noses bent out of shape over Spencer’s analysis of a very clear and obvious issue.  Yes, British nationalism put all its eggs in the UKIP basket, yes, UKIP lost its raison d’etre after Brexit, and, yes, Brexit hasn’t actually solved any of Britain’s racial and cultural problems.  And, yes, I remember that I was strongly in favor of Brexit – but for the same reasons I supported Trump.  Both Brexit and Trump in and of themselves are useless; however, as bringers of chaos against a destructive status quo, they’ve been useful.  And, of course, the EU as it currently exists is an anti-White disaster and it needs to be deconstructed.  But the idea that “Polish plumbers” (who of course don’t belong in the UK) are in any way the real existential problem is absurd.  Brexit itself solved nothing, the emphasis on Brexit and the UKIP damaged genuine British nationalism, and the whole sorry tale is yet another blow against the ethnonationalist narrative.  Ethnonationalism and mainstreaming – two failures.

I also get real enjoyment over that tired old paradigm that the failure of nationalism in America vs. its “success” in Europe is due to the “unworkable” pan-racial White aspect of American racial nationalism vs. the “grounded” ethnonationalism in Europe.  Err… first of all, given what’s happening in Europe, the migrant invasion and terror attacks being the most obvious examples, the fact that nationalist parties in Western Europe have gone from one failure to another is not exactly a ringing endorsement of the ethnonationalist approach. Second, the difference in success of America vs Europe (to the extent that it is true that nationalism is more advanced in Europe) is mostly due to:

1. The pathetic freakishness of the American “movement” that repulses people of all White ethnic backgrounds, and the fact that the American “movement” is hardly pan-European but openly despises a significant (minority) fraction of America’s White population (the problem is more that the American “movement” is not for all Whites, not that it is).

2. De facto social pricing (America) is more of an impediment to nationalist organizing than is de jure “hate” laws (Europe).  Johnson and Le Brun discussed this on a podcast and I agree with them.  Now, yes, I’ve been adamant that the “hate” laws in Europe must go, and that they are an impediment, but social pricing in America is a far bigger impediment. Wide-ranging soft totalitarianism deters more than narrowly applied harder totalitarianism.

Thus, if (1) the American “movement” was reformed, and (2) a way was found to counter-act social pricing, you’d quickly narrow the gap between American and European nationalist organizing.

Der Movement in Der News, 6/9/17

Build the tribe.

After this example of memetic appropriation, at AltRight.com, we see the startling revelation that hatred of Trump by the Left is essentially hatred of Whites.  That sounds familiar. Where may we have read that before?  Oh wait, here at this blog; for example, from Feb. 2016.

If the Alt Right is going to be great savior of the White race, it may be helpful to actually generate some original content other than that of yelling about “Pepe” and “Kek.”

Getting back to the 5PT article at Counter-Currents, we see this excerpt of a hostile comment:

Contrary to the author’s hypothesis, polling shows most whites are not in favor of mass immigration, suggesting they are wary of their own demographic replacement. The feeling of being invaded and replaced will only continue to grow as mass immigration continues unabated, until the issue becomes red hot. The problem is that our politicians, as usual, are moving far too slowly for those of us who already demand action. Immigration and demographics need to be made a major campaign issue in our elections, which will lead to parties making it a campaign promise to reduce immigration — and we need to hold them to it.

Most Whites may be against mass immigration, but they sure don’t vote that way when they have the chance to vote for even mainstreaming ethnonationalists like Le Pen and Wilders. Politicians moving far too slowly” – who?  Who has been elected?  Only the fraud Trump, and we all should have known better.  Polls are useless if the alleged opinions said polls represent neve become actualized into electoral victories or any other concrete real-world manifestation of White backlash.

In any case, both sides of this debate don’t seem to realize that “building our tribe” and “taking back our nations” are not incompatible or orthogonal to each other. It would seem that tribe-building is going to be a necessary prerequisite to nation-taking, and if the latter fails, then having the former around will allow the White tribe to survive (and possibly make new attempts at nation-taking in the future).

We need to do both the nation-taking (it’s too early to give up completely on that, despite the current grim reality) and tribe-building. And it’s the tribe building that needs to be the predominant focus, since it serves not only to aid nation-taking, but it also lays the groundwork for an effective strategy if the “take back the nation” efforts fail.  Tribe-building is the underlying foundation for a wide variety of overlapping efforts.

Note the comments about UKIP’s silk roadism and about “British Asians.”  I agree wholeheartedly with Spencer’s pan-European vision.  Delenda est ethnonationalism!

Rotten Orange and Silk Road News

In the news.

Not just Muslims.  It’s the forever war against Asians, Jews, NECs, and White leftists. One of the terrorists was a “British Asian” by the way.

The Deep State revealed. Not much of a winner. That’s who has a “top-secret security clearance” in today’s America.  

I don’t know what’s less surprising – that “America’s senator” Sessions is overmatched in his new role, or that Trump is angry at his only cabinet pick that was satisfactory to the Alt Right.  We are witnessing apolitical train wreck of unprecedented proportions. And according to the gamesters, wasn’t “Sessions as Attorney General” by itself “worth having Trump elected?”  

June 5: Spencer’s Video and an Open Call

An open call.

Here is an excellent, and realistic, Spencer video on the latest London terrorist attack. Here, Spencer hits some notes consistent with points I’ve made over the years: objectively worthless (my words, not his) Whites will continue to grovel and appease regardless of the provocations, worse is not better because there is apparently no limit in sight to the level of abuse Whites are willing to take, and that change will require a fundamental alteration in White thinking patterns so activists need to concentrate on basic principles and not overreact to single incidents like this one.

Spencer once again proves his potential as a pro-White leader.

Now, you know, I’m not of the Alt Right  and I (strongly) dislike the brand and its pretensions to legitimate “movement” hegemony.  I could in theory adopt an attitude of schadenfreude about all the divisive, internal Alt Right feuds going on, and if I was really the “crazy” and “bitter” lunatic the Alt Righters claim I am, that would indeed be my attitude.

However, I realize that – until the time comes that the Alt Right fad burns itself out – the Alt Right does have predominance (illegitimate hegemony) in racial activism today, particularly in America but growing in Western Europe as well. This predominance means that missteps of the Alt Right can harm racial nationalism as a whole, and I would like the damage minimized.  That is, we need “damage control” until such time that activists come to their senses (there’s a first time for everything) and realize there’s more to racial nationalism than Millennials, juvenile jackassery, generally superficial analyses, Trump worship, and screaming about Pepe and Kek.

In that frame of mind, I make an open call, I call upon both Spencer and Johnson to put their differences aside, exhibit genuine leadership for the greater good, and, at the very least, stop the attacks against each other and their allies.

Things change in Der Movement.  Not so long ago, Johnson was on good relations with Spencer and with Friberg.  Now, he’s on good relations with Hunter Wallace, a change from the past.  Spencer has refrained from criticizing Johnson until the recent Friberg incident.

Yes, I know, nationalist leaders of the past have had their feuds and falling outs.  Hitler and Rohm, Codreanu and Cuza, etc. But, guys, you are not at their level, your differences do not rise to the level of those historical breaks, and petty feuds mostly about personality and access to money aren’t helping any of us.