Category: Ukraine

Messiah or Naughty Boy?

Also:  comic book art, McSpencer, and other items.

Watch this. If you want the executive summary, start watching from 27:50. The video also punctures some fantasies about the Oriental Gods. HBDers weep bitter tears.

This is another example of Sallis being right. After Rushton died, Johnson censored my negative comments about Rushton from Counter-Currents (I was not “banned” from that platform at that time) when there was a Rushtonite hagiography going on there.  After all, we are not allowed to question the dogma – and “Rushton was a messiah” is part of the dogma. However, Dutton (“one of the boys”) researched Rushton’s life and work, and Dutton’s conclusions about Rushton are even harsher than mine were. Sallis right, Johnson wrong.  You can copy and paste that last phrase to explain just about everything.

Trump is “going to look into it.”  Who knows, perhaps the horse is Jewish.  Just look at its nose!

From September 2016:

…if Der Movement is co-opted and subsumed by the Alt-Right, and if the Alt-Right itself is co-opted by the HBD Alt-Wrong, then White Nationalism becomes effectively replaced by a cult worshiping Jewish and Asian IQ. This need not be immediately overt and obvious, a shallow facade of cardboard racialism could be put up as a front, with the ironclad edifice of Jewish/Asian supremacy setting the agenda just behind that facade and manipulating all the “latrine flies” against their own racial interests.  That is not far-fetched if you consider that the described scenario represents what is already going on in certain precincts of the “movement.”

And now, years later, we see Alt Right heroes throwing their lot in with the Jewish anti-WN HBDer Unz.  Prediction correct.

All of this bears close watching, close monitoring.  I would advise a double strategy: on the narrower, intra-Alt Right level, the WN Alt-Right needs to fully and definitively separate from the HBD Alt-Wrong. 

Instead, after the collapse of the Alt Right, they allowed themselves to be bought off for thirty shekels of silver.

On the broader “movement”-scale level, there needs to be a critical mass of quality activists who remain separate from the Alt-Right (although there may of course be cooperation between these activists and the hardcore WN Alt-Right action).

They didn’t listen, did they?

If that doesn’t happen, I fear that all the eggs in that basket of deplorables will end up being clones of Humpty Dumpty.  And we’re all headed for a great fall.

Which took place.  Sallis prescient again – or is using “Sallis” and “prescient” together in the same sentence a superfluous redundancy?

This is hilarious, and not much different from this.

In my opinion, this is the single greatest panel in comic book history. 

Now, the Jew Kirby has (with justification) been given great credit for his work.  However, Joe Sinnott as the inker has been relatively neglected in all the praise and Sinnott’s role needs to be explicitly acknowledged.

Some artist-inker combinations work well; others do not.  Kirby-Sinnott was classic; Bucker-Sinnott was excellent as well.  But Sinnott did not gel well with John Buscema, and I believe Buscema eventually requested his younger brother Sal to do his inking. Sal Buscema eventually became an important artist for Marvel, perhaps ultimately eclipsing John.

This brings up another issue. Artists, at least Marvel artists in the Silver and Bronze ages, all had distinctive styles, in some cases, very highly distinctive styles.  Kirby, for example. Think Ditko, Trimpe, Tuska, and others.  Probably none were as distinctive as Sal Buscema. I immediately knew that Sal Buscema was the artist of a comic book just from a brief look at some panels. Truth be told, at that time, I was not a fan of Sal’s art, particularly with respect to The Incredible Hulk, for which I was used to the art of Trimpe; in general, at that time, I preferred the smooth and rich lines of Kirby (with Sinnott) and the similar “roundness” of Trimpe, as opposed to the harsh lines and clenched-fist faces of Sal Buscema.

However, in the intervening years, my view has changed, and I now view Sal Buscema as an outstanding artist, one of the Marvel Pantheon, with a style more realistic than that of the more “roundness” artists – although in some ways I still prefer the latter. I still am not a fan of Sal Buscema’s depiction of the Hulk specifically, but in general Sal’s art was excellent.  

Further, this is all in contrast to the horror seen in comic books today.  In general, the art today is terrible, and in some cases unbelievably bad, and the stories are unimaginative and mostly SJW.  

Listen to this. So, it seems that the hypothesis – broached here – of a possible falling out between Spencer and Friberg is essentially not correct.  Assuming that is so, we come back to the question of Johnson’s sudden embrace of the Yang Gang – can it just be Johnson’s ego about UBI?

Spencer is correct about the power of censorship – and he’s more realistic than some folks who say “all will be well, just send in the ‘D’Nations” – and I note he admitted that the Alt Right never took any of it seriously.  Too many drunken podcasts, I suppose.  Spencer is being a bit naïve about “speed limits” for the rules of censorship.  Eventually the “speed limit” will be adjusted to eliminate all pro-White content.  What then?

Spencer is correct that Trump will likely do nothing about deplatforming and censorship, but I disagree that the “Alts” has much to do with Trump’s election, and, as stated above, he’s being stunningly naïve to believe that social media/tech regulation would leave loopholes that can be exploited by pro-Whites.

Spencer about AIM and infiltration – absolutely correct.  Friberg makes a good point about how “hate speech laws” exerts selective pressure to force the Far Right to tighten their propaganda and arguments, but this argument – and Spencer’s agreement with this – only goes so far.  Eventually, the laws will be adjusted to narrow the opening for discourse to such an extent that you’ll be left only with the safety valve of mainstream conservatism.  You cannot adjust forever without exerting pressure of your own. I’ve made suggestions about that on this site; this post is not the place to discuss those details.

About the Ukraine – look, at that time I supported the Ukrainian nationalists, but I was not under any illusions about their long term independence from the Neocons. On the other hand, Putin’s Russia is multiculturalist as well, and given the Ukraine’s tragic history I thought it appropriate to at least give the Ukrainian Right a chance to make things right – even if there was little chance of success.  Maybe that was just foolish nativete on my part. I’m not perfect.  Are you?  And would the Ukrainians be better off losing their soul and becoming part of a growing Eurasianist-Yellow/Brown-Islamic empire?

The Way of the World organizing – good idea in theory, but the “rules” put in place for safety will not work in my opinion. The Left is too skilled at infiltration, and the Right is too dumb to prevent it, for all of this to effectively function.

Trump takes decisive action!  After all, that’s why his base voted for him, right?

Is it possible for the “movement” to be this stupid?  Is it possible for water to be wet?

Advertisements

Holodomor Bloodguilt

Cash or check?


It would seem appropriate for Israel to give reparations to the Ukraine in compensation for the Holodomor (and one can also propose reparations to Russia and other nations affected by communism). The extent of these reparations can be equivalent to what Germany gave to Israel, adjusted for inflation.

Jews in the News, 4/13/15

All to be expected.
Jews in Hungary get rowdy, march, denounce Jobbik – to which I reply with two words: Bela Kun.
Thus, the Jewish mentality: countless Eastern Europeans (*) murdered by Jewish (**) commissars is just “something that happened,” but let a political party represent the interests of the native European majority, make Jews feel slightly uncomfortable by Jobbik, and it is a tragedy requiring international news reporting.  Note to marchers: there’s a reason why you are universally disliked, guys.
*Mostly in Russia and Ukraine, but to a lesser extent in every nation tainted by communism.
**Regardless of his matrilineage, Kun’s Jewish patrilineage would have made him eligible under Israel’s “law of return.”  Also please note the ancestry of the other architects of Hungary’s “Red Terror.”  Question: have the Jews ever admitted, much less apologized for, the crimes they committed under communism?

Nemtsov Update, 3/8/15

NECs in custody.

I note that the Russian authorities are holding suspects in the Nemtsov killing.  Putin’s Russia is a murky place and who knows if the truth on this issue will ever completely come out, but it is interesting that the suspects are described thus:

 

Moscow (AFP) – Four men were in custody Sunday for the killing of Russian opposition activist Boris Nemtsov in a probe which has yet to reveal the motive for the brazen assassination in the centre of Moscow. 

The suspects, from Chechnya in the volatile northern Caucasus region…

Of course, right after the killing, the Putin regime was eager to place blame in a different direction:


…pin the blame on those evil “right-wing” Ukrainians or those dastardly Russian “ultranationalists”…

We can be grateful I suppose that the Kremlin didn’t just decide to arrest some “ultranationalists” despite whatever actual evidence they have; perhaps they believed that a too-obvious set-up would cause some problems with Trad Vlad’s attempt to curry favor with more moderate nationalists in France, Hungary, and elsewhere.
Regardless of why a more even-handed approach is being taken in the actual investigation, the initial response of the Putin regime to the killing is instructive.  A crime that very possibly was carried out by Vlad’s pet Asiatic Muslims was quickly attributed to the hated Russian Slav “ultranationalists.”   It’s a good thing that Vlad is not ruling the UK, since he would, I presume, have been eager to pin Rotherham on those nasty “ultranationalists” of the BNP.
Meanwhile, the blushing schoolgirls continue to get all hot and bothered over their shirtless tiger-wresting traditionalist superhero.  The Delusional Right is a sorry sight indeed.

Nemtsov and Blaming the Far-Right

Nemtsov.
Excerpts, emphasis added:
– Other opposition leaders within Russia or dark outside forces interested in “destabilizing Russia” and willing to make a “sacrificial victim” (Vladimir Markin); these include “right-wing Ukrainian field commanders like Dmitro Yarosh and Dmitro Korchinsky, ex-leader of UNA-UNSO,” who recently spoke of “the need to commit terrorist attacks in Russia (TV Zvezda)
Russian ultranationalists; Nemtsov’s case has been reportedly assigned to a group at the Investigative Committee headed by Maj. Gen. Igor Krasnov, a senior special cases investigator known for his past work on the cases of ultranationalists, RBC.ru reported, citing Prokhorov, lawyer for Anna Duritskaya, Nemtsov’s companion who was with him on the night he was murdered.
Krasnov’s cases include that of Ivan Mironov, the nationalist accused of attacking Anatoly Chubais, head of Unified Energy System (RAO UES) in 2006, who was later acquitted in 2010, and also the ultranationalist group BORN [Battle Organization of Russian Nationalists] some of whose members have been convicted of murdering a number of people associated with opposing hate crimes including anti-fascist activists and a judge, and some of whom are still awaiting a verdict.
That suggests that the Kremlin is moving in the direction of fingering extremists in the ultranationalist movements, which at first were encouraged during patriotic campaigns unleashed with Russia’s forcible annexation of the Crimea, then later reined in by Putin in some cases when intellectuals began to complain about their incitement of violent against Ukrainians.
But of course: pin the blame on those evil “right-wing” Ukrainians or those dastardly Russian “ultranationalists” – the latter of which are those totally unreasonable people who want Russia to be for Russians, as opposed to Trad Vlad’s multiculturalist vision of a Yellow-Brown Russia populated by Muslim Central Asians, Chinese, and other such Asiatics. The schoolgirls could excuse Putin for pointing the finger at the Ukrainians, an obvious choice given the current conflict. Why what about the Russianultranationalists?  Isn’t it interesting that when the pressure is on, Trad Vlad reflexively attacks those on his right and not those on his left? After all, if we need to find someone to pin blame on, what about radical neo-Marxists?  Central Asian immigrants?  Jewish gangsters? Maybe Femen killed Nemtsov, perhaps using this method.  But, no.  The darling of the traditionalist American WN Right views as his most hated internal enemies the same types as are the blushing WN schoolgirls themselves.
Putin apologists have all sorts of excuses for Vlad’s anti-White, far-Left, ultra-liberal, multiculturalist, anti-racist embrace of multiracialism.  We are told that “Russian identity has always been multiracial.”  Well, what’s the history behind that?  First, Russia was conquered by the Mongols (hardly an endorsement for multiculturalism and appeasement of Asiatics).  Later, Russia expanded to the East and South, incorporating all sorts of NECs, Tartars, and Mongoloids, and some figures in Russian history were of part or full Tartar ancestry.  Well then, cannot the same be said about America, a nation founded on lands including Amerindians and Negroes?  Look at Pocahontas, Martin Luther King, and our current President.  Obviously, American identity is multiracial!  And yet the American WNs reject that for their own country, while accepting it for Russia, all because….why?  Because they “cream their pants” while seeing a shirtless Vlad wresting with tigers?  Why?  Because their obsessive anti-Jewish Manichean worldview tells them to embrace anyone that the Neocons criticize?  Yet they don’t embrace the Islamists.  Is it because Vlad is “White,” and makes noises about traditionalism that resonate to folks desperate to identify themselves with some sort of powerful leader, since they are too weak-minded to accept the reality of their own powerlessness?  Hey, if they want to support an influential White multiracialist traditionalist, then they can rally around “Jeb for ’16!”
Putin wants a “strong Russia,” independent of the racial and cultural composition of that Russia.  If Russian “strength” means that, once again, Slavs must groan under the Tartar Yoke, so be it. Bow down before your Yellow-Brown Asiatic masters, you lowly Slavs! Slav, Slave, what’s the difference?  After all, in the not-too-distant future, half the “Russian” army will be Muslim, so we must appease them to win their loyalty.  Maybe, one young Russian Slavic woman for every Tartar soldier, eh?
A real leader would accept short-term weakness for long-term preservation and long-term power and glory.  A real leader would cut loose all the Asiatics, have a Russia for Russians, a Slavic Russia, and if that means a contracted economy, and a half-sized army, then so be it.  Russia could build an all-White military capable of defending its territory based on an advanced nuclear arsenal and other modernized weaponry, combined with a highly-trained, well equipped, professional conventional force.  The Russian economy can be re-booted for a smaller, but well educated, population, and end the corruption!  Maybe it is not necessary for a leader to be worth $40 billion?  Maybe, I don’t know, $1 billion could be enough to live on (we must be frugal after all!), and the other $39 billion put back into the national coffers to help build a modernized, productive, and mostly autarkic, economy?  Maybe Russia can “ride out” the demographic valley and bounce back after several generations – without selling out the nation’s body and soul to the degenerate hordes of Central Asia?  Why not?  Do the schoolgirls have any answers to these questions?

Strom, Russia, and Putin

Clarifying a difficult situation.

Strom: This desire to destroy their best-organized opponents also explains why Zionists support a government that includes a few racial-nationalists in Ukraine: These money-men see the bigger picture; and Russia and its rising alliances, no matter how much they say they love Jews and America, and no matter how many Holocaust revisionists they imprison, form an alternate power structure to the New York / Tel Aviv axis and so must be encircled, contained, and taken down by any means necessary.


At this blog, I have been harshly critical of Putin and of the Western “blushing schoolgirls” who wet themselves in excitement thinking about Trad Vlad.

However, I also reject the Manichean worldview that simplifies every political situation into a binary, black-and-white, us. vs. them scenario.  My criticism of Putin does not mean I support the current Ukrainian government. My criticism of Putin and his “amen corner” does not mean I support the obvious Globalist-Neocon offensive against Russia.  The fact that I mock the blushing schoolgirls does not mean that I reject Strom’s reasonable and, in my opinion, more or less accurate analysis.

I simply take things a bit further, acknowledging the true dimensions of White powerlessness.  The enemy of my enemy is not necessarily my friend. In the Russia vs. Ukraine-Neocon conflict, neither side represents White interests.  In the long run, a victory for neither side will advance our cause.

This view is said to be not practical, lacking “pragmatism.”  I think otherwise; looking long term, my view represents hardcore reality, and, facing reality, however unpleasant, is ultimately practical and pragmatic.

The harsh truth: in the current conflict in Eastern Europe both sides are anti-White, as is the case with virtually every political conflict the world over. The original “Maidan” Ukrainian “revolution” was, in my opinion, clever Globalists, driven by the interests of the Tribe and by American geopolitical realpolitik, exploiting sincere and naive Ukrainian nationalists in order to establish a Neocon puppet regime. So, here I am in agreement with the blushing schoolgirls.  Where we part ways is in our assessment of Putin/Russia in this scenario. Strom misrepresents the truth here. It isn’t just that Putin uses some “squid ink” to hide his true motives; his true motives themselves are suspect. It isn’t just that Putin says he “loves Jews” or throws some nationalists in jail.  It is that his vision of Russia is multiracial and Eurasianist.  He is promoting a mirror image of multicultural globalism, but in this form under his control, replacing New York/Tel Aviv with Moscow.  I’m not interested in someone who cynically and instrumentally uses patriotism and traditionalism to promote a mixed-race multicultural agenda. We have enough of those in the GOP at home.

So, yes, fine, if it is Putin vs. the Necons, I prefer Putin, but I’m not going to invest any time/energy promoting the man and his cult following: he is not one of us, people who pretend otherwise show bad judgment, and I reject the idea that anyone who opposes New York/Tel Aviv deserves our groveling support. If that’s the case, why don’t WNs flock to support the Islamists? They too are against the Neocons and the Tribe. Why not?

Dugin, Putin, etc.

Some more facts on the case.
Exposing Dugin’s anti-White, anti-Western animus, read here.  Of course, Dugin’s “colored world revolution” anti-Westernism is the foundation ideology for Trad Vlad’s bare-chested macho interventionism. Now NATO member Estonia is a target, with the Great White Leader behaving more or less like a Third World thug. Then we have the useless guarantees of the “West.” Remember when Ukraine gave up its nuclear arsenal in exchange for a “Western” guarantee of Ukraine’s territorial sovereignty?  How’s that working out, Ukies?
It looks like Vlad has taken the measure of the affirmative action mulatto posing as the “leader” of the “West” and has found the hybrid wanting.