Category: war

Saturday News

In der news.

Watch this from 10:14 to 10:22 – the Silkers will spontaneously ejaculate over that, in a paroxysm of masochistic ecstasy.

More anti-vaxxer insanity exposed.

The System is unraveling and Der Movement has absolutely nothing to do with it.  It’s the Left that is energized, and the Colored Left will tear the nation apart, which is good.

Andrew Yang is a Chinaman who wants to buy off Whites with $1000 a month.  He’s using UBI to distract Whites from dispossession.  He’s the enemy.  And yet “pro-White leaders” and “activists” and ranting about “the Yang Gang” with the same onanistic fervor they brought to their “God Emperor.”  Well, at least the Princess Tulsi Coconut fad didn’t last that long.

If judgment could be measured like IQ, the Alt Right would be retarded.

Some get it right:

@Urbanus_Crusade
 3h3 hours ago
More
No doubt. But I find it inherently demoralizing that the altright is putting its faith in a Taiwanese man, who more or less agrees with the globohomo agenda.
He’s an intelligent and articulate man, with interesting ideas, but I’m not jumping on this bandwagon.
Evan McLaren
@EvanMcLaren
 3h3 hours ago
More
He’s getting what energy we have to spare for conventional political discourse, and he’s given us something to meme about. If people are placing faith in him beyond that, it reflects the same problem we encountered in 2016: immaturity and unseriousness.

Yeah….

My extensive analysis of ancestry testing companies is in the editing stage and should be posted soon, hopefully within the next week.

Advertisements

Friday Follies

Race and Der Movement.  In all cases, emphasis added.

The average reader may not know this, but Hela cells are often a big problem in the biomedical cell culture laboratory environment – the cells are aggressive and invasive (surprise!), resulting in significant cross-contamination of other, more unique and valuable, cell cultures.

However, 20 years after Henrietta Lacks’ death, mounting evidence suggested that HeLa cells contaminated and overgrew other cell lines. Cultures, supposedly of tissues such as breast cancer or mouse, proved to be HeLa cells. We describe the history behind the development of HeLa cells, including the first published description of Ms Lacks’ autopsy, and the cell culture contamination that resulted.

Many labs therefore want nothing to do with that cell line, in order to preserve the integrity – dare we say “purity?”- of their other cell culture stocks. Interesting analogies can be made to other, broader, societal, situations.

Good news.

I have two points to make about this.

First, we should not be surprised that Fukuyama preaches to Whites memes that will inevitably lead to their destruction.  As EGI Notes tells you time and time again: The existential meaning of Asians is hatred of Whites. 

Second, we see Greg once again engaging in the most outrageous and dishonest gaslighting – this time trying to convince you that WWI and WWII were not due to petty ethnonationalism, but a lack thereof.

You see, “WWI was not a war of nations, but of empires.” The empires did it!  It were all the South Asians of India, the Algerians of North Africa, the Egyptians, the Negroes of German South West Africa, the Siberians – they were the ones pushing the honest and humble ethnonationalists of Great Britain, France, the Turkish Ottomans, Germans, and Russians into war. It had nothing at all to do with the rise of German power, the British desire to thwart that power, French fear and hatred of Germany, Russia’s desire for power and influence and their ethnosubracial pan-Slavism, no sir!  It was dem dere empires dat done it, lordy yes!

At this point, the ethnonationalist riposte would be: Austria-Hungary!  Empire!  The Archduke!  The Serbs!  Empire caused the war!  

Does anyone really believe that the underlying cause of WWI was the assassination of some useless aristocratic parasite?  No – the great powers of Europe, which did NOT include the “sick men” of Austria-Hungary and the Ottomans – were primed for war, wanted war – because of their selfish, petty nationalist (or subracial-ethnic-cultural-petty nationalist in the case of Russia) interests. The young Europeans who cheered for war and volunteered in droves in 1914 did not do so because of “empire” or because of “the Archduke.” They did so out of national pride and because of a petty nationalist animus toward their fellow Europeans.

Therefore, the assassination was merely an excuse. The Austrian tail did not wag the German dog; the Serbian tail did not wag the Russian dog, and the British and French didn’t care one whit about “national determination” (they were “empires,” no?).  It was all an excuse for a petty nationalist war that was not caused by empires but that ultimately caused the end of those empires.

And, oh, yes, WWII occurred “because the ethnic boundaries were not properly drawn after WWI.” Right? Very good.  By that logic, Greg, your Saint Adolf should have stopped after uniting with Austria and getting the German part of Czechoslovakia.  Or are you going to tell us the invasion of Poland was really about the “Polish corridor?”  Yeah…and I have a bridge to sell you connecting Manhattan and Brooklyn. Hitler had his lebensraum aims that were completely ethnonationalist, or at least Germanic/Nordicist. Hitler wanted land from the Slavs and wanted revenge against the French. There was also an honest fear and loathing of Soviet communism – although that didn’t stop the Nazi-Soviet pact to destroy Poland.  The British were playing their usual game of preventing a continental power from emerging, and, again, the French feared and hated the Germans. And it was the petty nationalism of the British and French that prevented a pan-European alliance with Germany and Italy to destroy Soviet communism. The USSR had its own agenda, both of power politics and Marxist expansionism. Tell me – where in all of this was the war being caused by pan-European ideals?  By multi-national states?  And the only real link to “empire” here was the German (and Italian and Japanese) national desire for empire.  And did Great Britain fight the war “to save the empire?”  Hardly.  Hitler was willing to guarantee the existence of the British Empire, which he admired.  The British just wanted to destroy Hitler and Nazi Germany.  The same old “grand strategy” of Great Britain – which lost them their empire and resulted in the homeland being reverse colonized by the Third World.  Ethnonationalism!  Snug in your hobbit hole!

The facts – the clear historical facts – demonstrate that petty nationalism, ethnonationalism, caused both World Wars and wrecked the White World, and to argue otherwise, and to try and shift the blame to the opponents of petty nationalism, is an even greater act of outrageously despicable dishonesty than the previous Gaslighting Greg act of blaming the failure of WN 2.0 on those who eschewed and opposed WN 2.0.

I have no idea what happened to this guy Johnson; I think his hatred of Richard Spencer has unhinged his mind.

A commentator responds to Johnson:

Now, while I strongly believe in the practical value of ethnic homogeneity this is not always feasible. Also a myriad of small but homogeneous states without a certain supra-national structure will render them indefensible against the Asian Empires – Russia and China! And these two do know how to genocide. So again, an effete bureaucrat of EU Commission is a better choice (and probably the only one acceptable currently) in order to maintain the peace between not perfectly homogeneous states but also to prevent the Asian Empires expansion in Europe.
This structure was working in a certain degree until Angela Merkel blown it up by opening unilaterally the borders of Germany.
My hope is for a Union of all white peoples (Europe, US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and South Africa and a proper part of South America) each people living in its own state based on its historical right (defined genetically and culturally), but organized in a supra national white states entity; expulsion of all non-European populations and individuals, including the mixed race individuals. Common defense, common positions regarding the rest of the world. Free internal markets. Free circulation of ideas and goods. Limited people circulation.

That’s OK as far as it goes, but he should have critiqued Johnson’s initial premises.  For an ethnonationalist to blame WWI and WWII on “empires” and “multi-national states” is chutzpah of an order to make Dershowitz proud.  It’s disgusting.

Then we have the vile hypocrite Roissy, who laments this story, while he has previously bragged about one of his girlfriends offering “do you want to put it in my ass?”  I guess the blowback from the unbridled nihilistic sexual hedonism the gamesters preach is not always to their liking.  Then we have the hypocrisy of “game” advocates always throwing their “Christianity” in our face, as if their lifestyle is in any way even remotely compatible with even the most modern dilution of authentic Christian belief.  I can honestly say that in my entire life I have never met even one genuine Christian; as Nietzsche wrote – there was only one Christian and he died on the cross.

“Based” Tulsi.  Gee…the Woman on Green Pepe Syndrome hit a snag real fast, eh?

Wrong, wrong, they’re always wrong.

Leftist lies on race, this from The NY Times, a racist media outlet who hired White-hating genocidal Asian bigot (or, more simply – “Asian”) Sarah Jeong:

People who live in a place today often bear no genetic resemblance to people who lived there thousands of years ago, so the idea that something in your blood makes you meaningfully Spanish is absurd.

Hmm… is that why Otzi the Iceman is genetically most similar to modern Europeans?  Is that why ancient DNA analyses typically puts those samples closest to their modern day counterparts than to, say, people halfway across the globe?  How about a bet?  I’d say that the genomes of ancient Britons are genetically more similar to the modern English than they are to, say, Nigerians.  If I’m wrong, I’ll admit it right here.  If I’m right, the author of the NY Times piece will agree to resign his position and get a swastika tattooed on his forehead.  Fair bet?

What You Sow So Shall You Reap

The chickens have come home to roost, as Malcolm X would say.

“This time it’s war,” declared the Le Parisien daily, as France’s media reacted with horror but determination after Friday’s wave of attacks that left at least 120 dead.

Yes, it is war.  The problem you see is that only one side is fighting it. When only one side fights a war, the other side inevitably loses. Yes, I know that is common sense, but with the shockingly inferior pile of biomass known as “the White race,” the most simple declarations of self-interest have to be carefully explained as if one were talking to a small child.

Centre-right daily Le Figaro took up a similar theme, splashing with the headline “War in central Paris” amid scenes of carnage at several locations in the French capital.

Well, you’ve been importing millions of enemy soldiers. Yes, it is war.

Many papers called for unity in the country that is still reeling from jihadist attacks in January that claimed 17 lives.“In the name of the true martyrs of yesterday, the innocent victims and in the name of the Republic, France will be able to stay united and stand together,” said Le Parisien.

Such statements are exactly the reason why this incident occurred in the first place. What France needs now is not “unity.”  You don’t need “unity” with those attacking you and killing you. You don’t need “unity” with those demographically replacing you. You don’t need “unity” with politicians who promote native French genocide. What you do need is DISUNITY, a second French Revolution that would make the first look like a calm parliamentary debate by comparison.

The “terrorist barbarism” has crossed a “historic line,” said the head of the left-leaning Liberation daily, calling for France to stay resolute.

To be “resolute,” all “left-leaning” Frenchmen need to be put on trial, you know, like Louis XVI. And with the same outcome.

“It is impossible not to link these bloody events with the battles raging in the Middle East. France is playing its part there. It must continue to do so without blinking,” wrote Laurent Joffrin in an editorial.

Joffrin, you stupid, despicable, pathetic, mendacious bastard, let me rewrite that for you:

It is impossible not to link these bloody events with mass immigration and multiculturalism in France. France is destroying itself. It must not continue to do so, and must take purge the nation of aliens without blinking.

After Rotherham and Charlie Hebdo I made predictions:
More immigration, more Muslims, more “hate laws” against native nationalists, more multiculturalism, more surrender.
And I was right. We are in the midst of a “refugee” invasion of Europe by the same folk that France is “at war” with in the “Middle East.”  Expect that the reaction to the Paris atrocity to be:
More immigration, more refugees, more Muslims, more surrender, more legal persecution of the Front National (which may well be outlawed), more laws restricting native activism, more concern about a non-existent “backlash,” more praise for “unity” and “diversity” and “multiculturalism,” and more talk about fighting in “the Middle East” rather than fighting in the streets of France, where the enemy actually is.
This blog is, of course, a pacifistic trumpet of humanitarianism, non-violence, and tolerance. Of course – and let there be no doubt whatsoever! – that this blog abhors and denounces any and all forms of violence, and instead calls for a calm inter-faith and inter-ethnic dialogue to resolve these issues. No doubt. But, speaking purely hypothetically, we can ask – if the native French ethny were healthy, how would they react to this?  Well, the same way a healthy British population would have reacted to Rotherham: by rampaging through the streets, butchering the immigrant communities, hanging the politicians, and setting up a far-right racial nationalist revolutionary government. This blog of course opposes any such actions, which would be horribly horrendous and inappropriate. Just saying that describes what a normal and healthy reaction would be.  No need to worry about it. Whites are so pitifully weak, so subhumanly inferior, and so devoid of any dignity or self-respect that they will grovel and surrender, and so set themselves up for the next such incident.

The Dodo Bird was infinitely more superior – from the standpoint of biological adaptive fitness – than the lowly White race is today.

The Nature of Conflict

Interesting paper.

This research establishes that the emergence, prevalence, recurrence, and severity of intrastate conflicts in the modern era reflect the long shadow of prehistory. Exploiting variations across national populations, it demonstrates that genetic diversity, as determined predominantly during the exodus of humans from Africa tens of thousands of years ago, has contributed significantly to the frequency, incidence, and onset of both overall and ethnic civil conflict over the last half-century, accounting for a large set of geographical and institutional correlates of conflict, as well as measures of economic development. Furthermore, the analysis establishes the significant contribution of genetic diversity to the intensity of social unrest and to the incidence of intragroup factional conflict. These findings arguably reflect the contribution of genetic diversity to the degree of fractionalization and polarization across ethnic, linguistic, and religious groups in the national population; the adverse influence of genetic diversity on interpersonal trust and cooperation; the contribution of genetic diversity to divergence in preferences for public goods and redistributive policies; and the potential impact of genetic diversity on economic inequality within a society.

Invading Their Own Country

Hood essay.
I would like to congratulate Gregory Hood for this fine essay, which sums up the truth about WWII and the “greatest generation.”  It also puts the spotlight on the execrable scum Churchill, who has to rank among history’s biggest fools.  Imagine that: sacrificing your nation’s empire, shedding your people’s best blood, so that in coming decades quoting your own words will be grounds for arrest in your own nation.  Good going there, Winnie.
More Hood and less Hamilton, please.