Category: war

Skorzeny and Jeelvy

Two idiots.

This book, and this one is also on the same subject, about a minor but very interesting episode of WWII, deconstructs the Skorzeny myth. These books persuasively argue that Skorzeny was an inept blowhard, a publicity hound who got credit for a successful raid to which he contributed little and actually almost ruined. General Student and others deserve the real credit.

Skorzeny, worshipped by some in Der Movement, is a clear example of Der Movement’s obsessions and fetishes.  An Austrian Nazi – and ostensibly a politically dedicated Nazi – Skorzeny also I presume wins points because of his negative views of Italians, as chronicled in Irving’s Hitler’s War. But, alas, the Aryan Superman Skorzeny was not only an incompetent fraud, but also a traitor who worked for Jews.

I mean, too bad he’s not alive today, he’s got what it takes to be a WN 2.0 hero!  Maybe Unz would give him a column at The Unz Review.

Nicholas R. Jeelvy

Posted October 24, 2019 at 12:35 am | Permalink

The establishment has to pretend like we don’t exist and prop up alt-lite grifters and milquetoasts. It’s called “unthinging”.

At the same time, another wing of the establishment is censoring those grifters, who are more fragile to censorship than us, because they depend on numbers rather than truth.

The beast is scratching at itself, folks. The beginnings of victory are visible.

Victory is coming!  All you gotta do is send in dem dere “D’Nations!”  Remember those who give live in the golden age today!  This guy writes for Counter-Currents and has the nerve to talk about “grifters.”  These guys got balls the size of Jupiter.

Odds and Ends, 10/1/19

More of the same.

Zman the liar:

The alt-right never got around to thinking up a new metaphysics. They spent their time recreating an aesthetic from a bygone age that was intended to shock, rather than celebrate a new ideological movement. The closest they came to imagining an alternative Right was borrowing the idea of an ethnostate from fringe Russian thinkers. Otherwise, the alt-right was just a collection of complaints decorated with some racist and fascist language and imagery.

Thus, Zman is parroting Johnson’s lie that the fall of WN 2.0 was mimicking WN 1.0 while the truth was the exact opposite: WN 2.0 represented an entirely new aesthetic – Millennial and Generation Z juvenile jackassery and mindless snark (Beavis-and-Butthead White nationalism).  The major things they had in common with WN 1.0 was the commitment to the ethnic affirmative action program and the usual ethnic fetishism.

And what to make of this?

.. was borrowing the idea of an ethnostate from fringe Russian thinkers.

Sir Humphrey of Ireland was Russian?  Seriously though, hasn’t a “White ethnostate” been a staple of WN thought for decades?  What the hell does it have to do with Russians?  This is what happens when a smug know-it-all drops out of nowhere and establishes himself as a “movement” voice without knowing what the hell he is talking about.

Juri
Do not underestimate the cucked electorate.. Austrian elections results just came in and anti immigration FPÖ is down by 10 per cent and far left greens up by 14 per cent. Greta Thunberg and other screaming lunatics turned entire Austria to far left.

The ghosts of Hubert Humphrey and John Lindsay are well pleased.

Sallis continues to be proven correct. Der Movement is as predictable as an atomic clock.

Germany’s Schettino.  Excerpts, emphasis added:

On a list of historical figures who have left disaster in their wake, few can top Erich Ludendorff. And yet, he was not an incompetent man. On the contrary, he was one of World War I’s most able generals, among the few who recognized that Western Front battlefield tactics would require a fundamental rethinking, especially with regard to combat leadership.
Ludendorff was born on April 9, 1865, in the town of Kruszewnia, near Posen, Prussia. Like most of the border towns split between Polish and German ethnicity, Kruszewnia was a hotbed of Prusso-German nationalism. His parents were middle-class but strongly nationalist. And as young Erich gobbled up military histories filled with romantic legends and nationalist nonsense about Prussia’s struggles against Napoléon or its heroic defeat of the “evil French” in the Franco-Prussian War, his nationalistic fervor soon eclipsed that of his parents. 
The truth was that unrestricted submarine warfare would almost immediately bring the United States into the war. Here again, Ludendorff threw his weight behind the navy’s arguments by insisting the United States was incapable of fielding an effective army, much less deploying it to Europe to fight on the Western Front. His comment to a senior industrialist in September 1916 sums up his understanding of strategy: “The United States does not bother me…in the least; I look upon a declaration of war by the United States with indifference.” Even more astonishing is that in the fall of 1916 Ludendorff was seriously worried that Holland or Denmark might enter the war on the Allied side…The U-boat offensive had failed. It remains one of the more disastrous strategic decisions in human history.
Although Ludendorff managed to build an extraordinary, albeit fragile, force for his coming offensive, he did not have the slightest idea what its operational goals should be. When asked as much by Crown Prince Rupprecht of Bavaria, group commander of the northern forces along the Western Front, Ludendorff testily replied: “I object to the word ‘operations.’ We will punch a hole into [their line]. For the rest we shall see. We also did it this way in Russia.” And that is precisely what the Germans, under Ludendorff’s direction, did. Their impressive battlefield gains were completely devoid of strategic and operational benchmarks, and they constructed no defenses to maintain the greatly expanded front…
…Ludendorff displayed neither leadership nor strategic sense. In September he began casting about for someone to blame for the looming German defeat. His initial target was his staff. By early October, he had shifted the blame to the liberals and socialists. As the German political, strategic and operational situation spiraled out of control, Ludendorff himself approached a complete breakdown. On October 26, the Kaiser dismissed him. Disguising himself in a false beard, Ludendorff fled to Sweden to write his extraordinarily dishonest memoirs.
As a commander, Ludendorff represented the strengths and weaknesses of the German army. “In my final analysis on Ludendorff,” notes David Zabecki, the foremost historian of Germany’s 1918 offensives, “I have to conclude that in many ways he was a reflection of the German army as a whole in the first half of the 20th century: tactically gifted, operationally flawed and strategically bankrupt.”

Some more.

And by the war’s final summer when it was clear that defeat was inexorable, the general slipped into a downward spiral of despair. He exhibited violent mood swings, lashed out at Hindenburg and even reportedly broke down in tears before his subordinates. Some speculated that he was in the throes of a nervous breakdown.

Interestingly, I do not recall any Chris Brand posts about “neuroticism and anxiety” with respect to that episode.  Very selective, eh, Chris?  Brand can’t answer right now, being kept busy in hell and all.

WWI: The Lie to End All Lies

Contra Johnson’s thesis.

Let’s consider Johnson’s absurd thesis that WWI (and II!) had nothing to do with petty nationalistic competition between European nation states, but instead was due to “empires.”

I will now consider this, excerpts follow (emphasis added) with some comments:

The early years of the 20th century saw tremendous growth in Europe of both population and prosperity. With arts and culture flourishing, few believed a general war possible due to the peaceful cooperation required to maintain increased levels of trade as well as technologies such as the telegraph and railroad. Despite this, numerous social, military, and nationalistic tensions ran beneath the surface. As the great European empires struggled to expand their territory, they were confronted with increasing social unrest at home as new political forces began to emerge.

Nationalistic tensions. Well, everyone seems to recognize this reality except Johnson and his band of liars.  The idea that “empire” was a major driving factor is ludicrous.  Consider: In WWI, the British, French, and Russian empires were allies, even though in past decades and past centuries, these empires were in conflict.  What changed?  Simple – the national interests of the states in question. The fact that they were empires were incidental. There were conflicts of national interests, and imperial considerations were just one manifestation of those national conflicts of interests. By 1914, the rise of Germany was the threat that brought together the convergence of British, French, and Russian interests.  Empires or no empires, the shifting constellations of national interests would have existed and led to war.

Rise of Germany

The main issue.

In the resulting Treaty of Frankfurt which ended the war, France was forced to cede Alsace and Lorraine to Germany. The loss of this territory badly stung the French and was a motivating factor in 1914.

Indeed.  A territorial dispute – local European territory not colonial – was a motivating factor in the rush to war.  Petty nationalism, conflicts between neighboring states, historical enmity and revanchism – all in the mix.

Building a Tangled Web

As we’ll see, the “tangled web” of alliances – Johnson’s vaunted “temporary solutions to temporary problems” – led to the war that helped wreck the White world.

With Germany united, Bismarck began setting about to protect his newly formed empire from foreign attack. 

Empire?  Johnson starts breathing heavily. Unfortunately for him, “empire” in this context is the modern German nation state, cobbled together from an amalgamation of smaller entities.  So, at what point is today’s ethnonationalism merely a current interpretation of past imperialism?  Freedom for Bavaria!

“A Place in the Sun” and the Naval Arms Race

An ambitious leader and the grandson of England’s Queen Victoria, Wilhelm sought to elevate Germany to equal status with the other great powers of Europe. As a result, Germany entered the race for colonies with the goal of becoming an imperial power. 

In other words, Germany’s pursuit of a real empire was a result of petty nationalist competition with Great Britain and France.

These efforts to obtain territory overseas brought Germany into conflict with the other powers, especially France, as the German flag was soon raised over parts of Africa and on islands in the Pacific.

Petty nationalism started the process.  Overseas conflicts were a manifestation of this.

A global power, Britain moved in 1902 to form an alliance with Japan to curtail German ambitions in the Pacific. This was followed by the Entente Cordiale with France in 1904, which while not a military alliance, resolved many of the colonial squabbles and issues between the two nations.

Suddenly, “colonial squabbles” lost their importance in light of the German threat.  If the nations of Europe had been confederated, none of this would have occurred.  Instead we got Johnson’s “temporary alliances.”  Followed by a world war.

This pan-Slavic sentiment was backed Russia who had signed a military agreement to aid Serbia if the nation was attacked by the Austrians.

Yet we are told by some (commentators at Amren) that pan-Slavism is an acceptable alternative to pan-Europeanism.

Turning to their ally, the Austrians inquired regarding the German position on the matter. On July 5, 1914, Wilhelm, downplaying the Russian threat, informed the Austrian ambassador that his nation could “count on Germany’s full support” regardless of the outcome. This “blank check” of support from Germany shaped Vienna’s actions.

Always the troublemakers.

Behind the scenes in Berlin, German officials were eager for a war with Russia but were restrained by the need to make the Russians appear as the aggressors.

Surprise!

The Dominoes Fall

While the German military clamored for war…

I’m shocked, shocked I say.

Early on July 31, Russia began a full mobilization of its forces in preparation for war with Austria-Hungary. This pleased Bethmann-Hollweg who was able to couch German mobilization later that day as a response to the Russians even though it was scheduled to begin regardless. 

My being shocked continues. 

Though it was unlikely that Britain could have remained neutral if France was attacked, it entered the fray that next day when German troops invaded Belgium activating the 1839 Treaty of London. 

Those pesky treaties and alliances again.

On August 6, Austria-Hungary declared war on Russia and six days later entered into hostilities with France and Britain. Thus by August 12, 1914, the Great Powers of Europe were at war and four and a half years of savage bloodshed were to follow.

Thank you, petty nationalism.

Comment left at Counter-Currents:

HungarianFashionista
Posted September 29, 2019 at 12:59 pm | Permalink
(Health warning: The first 30 minutes of this podcast contains a large dose of WW1 Entente propaganda.)
I wish Western nationalists would stop pontificating about and lecturing Eastern Europe. We take care of our corner of the white world, and you take care of yours, that should be the rule in nationalist politics.

They should stop pontificating about Southern Europe as well, a topic about which they clearly know nothing.

We take care of our corner of the white world, and you take care of yours, that should be the rule in nationalist politics.

You would think that “ethnonationalists” would inherently understand that, but, you see, in reality they are ethnoimperialists.  For example, the British-Saxon hybrid John Morgan believes he has the right to live in Hungary, despite not being an ethnic Hungarian, while pontificating about Hungary and lecturing to Hungarians, all the time lauding the alleged virtues of “ethnonationalism.”  It’s “ethnonationalism for me but not for thee” for these imperialistic invasive hypocrites.

The Meaning of D-Day

Refuting leftist lies.

June 6 brought us the usual leftist paradigms about how WWII means that physical violence committed against anyone to the right of Jeb Bush is justified.  We read comments like:

June 6 was the 75th anniversary of the greatest gathering of anti-fascists in history.

From the perspective of American involvement in D-Day, let’s rephrase that for accuracy:

June 6 was the 75th anniversary of a large group of men, involuntarily drafted from the population of a racially segregated nation, invading a European colonial power that was occupied by an European nation, the invasion setting forth from the territory of yet another European colonial power, led by a general who, upon later becoming US President, instituted “Operation Wetback” to deport Mexican illegals, and which had as its best general an Anglo-supremacist borderline racialist noted for making pro-German comments.

Apparently, that’s “anti-fascism,” 1944-style.

2019-style “anti-fascism” is, on the other hand, a bunch of smelly, masked, noodle-armed, wanna-be Marxist-Anarchist, middle-class and upper-class soyboys, with poor personal hygiene, allied with global capitalism and working hand-in-glove with the political establishment, sucker-punching genuine dissidents and then running away like hysterical menstruating schoolgirls.

Question: If WWII means that it’s OK to “punch Nazis,” do the Korean and Vietnam wars mean that it’s OK to “punch Commies?’’  Just pointing out the hypocrisy – EGI Notes is, of course, a militantly pacifist blog, oozing with the milk of human kindness, and this blog unalterably rejects and denounces any and all forms of hatred and violence. And don’t you forget it!

Saturday News

In der news.

Watch this from 10:14 to 10:22 – the Silkers will spontaneously ejaculate over that, in a paroxysm of masochistic ecstasy.

More anti-vaxxer insanity exposed.

The System is unraveling and Der Movement has absolutely nothing to do with it.  It’s the Left that is energized, and the Colored Left will tear the nation apart, which is good.

Andrew Yang is a Chinaman who wants to buy off Whites with $1000 a month.  He’s using UBI to distract Whites from dispossession.  He’s the enemy.  And yet “pro-White leaders” and “activists” and ranting about “the Yang Gang” with the same onanistic fervor they brought to their “God Emperor.”  Well, at least the Princess Tulsi Coconut fad didn’t last that long.

If judgment could be measured like IQ, the Alt Right would be retarded.

Some get it right:

@Urbanus_Crusade
 3h3 hours ago
More
No doubt. But I find it inherently demoralizing that the altright is putting its faith in a Taiwanese man, who more or less agrees with the globohomo agenda.
He’s an intelligent and articulate man, with interesting ideas, but I’m not jumping on this bandwagon.
Evan McLaren
@EvanMcLaren
 3h3 hours ago
More
He’s getting what energy we have to spare for conventional political discourse, and he’s given us something to meme about. If people are placing faith in him beyond that, it reflects the same problem we encountered in 2016: immaturity and unseriousness.

Yeah….

My extensive analysis of ancestry testing companies is in the editing stage and should be posted soon, hopefully within the next week.

Friday Follies

Race and Der Movement.  In all cases, emphasis added.

The average reader may not know this, but Hela cells are often a big problem in the biomedical cell culture laboratory environment – the cells are aggressive and invasive (surprise!), resulting in significant cross-contamination of other, more unique and valuable, cell cultures.

However, 20 years after Henrietta Lacks’ death, mounting evidence suggested that HeLa cells contaminated and overgrew other cell lines. Cultures, supposedly of tissues such as breast cancer or mouse, proved to be HeLa cells. We describe the history behind the development of HeLa cells, including the first published description of Ms Lacks’ autopsy, and the cell culture contamination that resulted.

Many labs therefore want nothing to do with that cell line, in order to preserve the integrity – dare we say “purity?”- of their other cell culture stocks. Interesting analogies can be made to other, broader, societal, situations.

Good news.

I have two points to make about this.

First, we should not be surprised that Fukuyama preaches to Whites memes that will inevitably lead to their destruction.  As EGI Notes tells you time and time again: The existential meaning of Asians is hatred of Whites. 

Second, we see Greg once again engaging in the most outrageous and dishonest gaslighting – this time trying to convince you that WWI and WWII were not due to petty ethnonationalism, but a lack thereof.

You see, “WWI was not a war of nations, but of empires.” The empires did it!  It were all the South Asians of India, the Algerians of North Africa, the Egyptians, the Negroes of German South West Africa, the Siberians – they were the ones pushing the honest and humble ethnonationalists of Great Britain, France, the Turkish Ottomans, Germans, and Russians into war. It had nothing at all to do with the rise of German power, the British desire to thwart that power, French fear and hatred of Germany, Russia’s desire for power and influence and their ethnosubracial pan-Slavism, no sir!  It was dem dere empires dat done it, lordy yes!

At this point, the ethnonationalist riposte would be: Austria-Hungary!  Empire!  The Archduke!  The Serbs!  Empire caused the war!  

Does anyone really believe that the underlying cause of WWI was the assassination of some useless aristocratic parasite?  No – the great powers of Europe, which did NOT include the “sick men” of Austria-Hungary and the Ottomans – were primed for war, wanted war – because of their selfish, petty nationalist (or subracial-ethnic-cultural-petty nationalist in the case of Russia) interests. The young Europeans who cheered for war and volunteered in droves in 1914 did not do so because of “empire” or because of “the Archduke.” They did so out of national pride and because of a petty nationalist animus toward their fellow Europeans.

Therefore, the assassination was merely an excuse. The Austrian tail did not wag the German dog; the Serbian tail did not wag the Russian dog, and the British and French didn’t care one whit about “national determination” (they were “empires,” no?).  It was all an excuse for a petty nationalist war that was not caused by empires but that ultimately caused the end of those empires.

And, oh, yes, WWII occurred “because the ethnic boundaries were not properly drawn after WWI.” Right? Very good.  By that logic, Greg, your Saint Adolf should have stopped after uniting with Austria and getting the German part of Czechoslovakia.  Or are you going to tell us the invasion of Poland was really about the “Polish corridor?”  Yeah…and I have a bridge to sell you connecting Manhattan and Brooklyn. Hitler had his lebensraum aims that were completely ethnonationalist, or at least Germanic/Nordicist. Hitler wanted land from the Slavs and wanted revenge against the French. There was also an honest fear and loathing of Soviet communism – although that didn’t stop the Nazi-Soviet pact to destroy Poland.  The British were playing their usual game of preventing a continental power from emerging, and, again, the French feared and hated the Germans. And it was the petty nationalism of the British and French that prevented a pan-European alliance with Germany and Italy to destroy Soviet communism. The USSR had its own agenda, both of power politics and Marxist expansionism. Tell me – where in all of this was the war being caused by pan-European ideals?  By multi-national states?  And the only real link to “empire” here was the German (and Italian and Japanese) national desire for empire.  And did Great Britain fight the war “to save the empire?”  Hardly.  Hitler was willing to guarantee the existence of the British Empire, which he admired.  The British just wanted to destroy Hitler and Nazi Germany.  The same old “grand strategy” of Great Britain – which lost them their empire and resulted in the homeland being reverse colonized by the Third World.  Ethnonationalism!  Snug in your hobbit hole!

The facts – the clear historical facts – demonstrate that petty nationalism, ethnonationalism, caused both World Wars and wrecked the White World, and to argue otherwise, and to try and shift the blame to the opponents of petty nationalism, is an even greater act of outrageously despicable dishonesty than the previous Gaslighting Greg act of blaming the failure of WN 2.0 on those who eschewed and opposed WN 2.0.

I have no idea what happened to this guy Johnson; I think his hatred of Richard Spencer has unhinged his mind.

A commentator responds to Johnson:

Now, while I strongly believe in the practical value of ethnic homogeneity this is not always feasible. Also a myriad of small but homogeneous states without a certain supra-national structure will render them indefensible against the Asian Empires – Russia and China! And these two do know how to genocide. So again, an effete bureaucrat of EU Commission is a better choice (and probably the only one acceptable currently) in order to maintain the peace between not perfectly homogeneous states but also to prevent the Asian Empires expansion in Europe.
This structure was working in a certain degree until Angela Merkel blown it up by opening unilaterally the borders of Germany.
My hope is for a Union of all white peoples (Europe, US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and South Africa and a proper part of South America) each people living in its own state based on its historical right (defined genetically and culturally), but organized in a supra national white states entity; expulsion of all non-European populations and individuals, including the mixed race individuals. Common defense, common positions regarding the rest of the world. Free internal markets. Free circulation of ideas and goods. Limited people circulation.

That’s OK as far as it goes, but he should have critiqued Johnson’s initial premises.  For an ethnonationalist to blame WWI and WWII on “empires” and “multi-national states” is chutzpah of an order to make Dershowitz proud.  It’s disgusting.

Then we have the vile hypocrite Roissy, who laments this story, while he has previously bragged about one of his girlfriends offering “do you want to put it in my ass?”  I guess the blowback from the unbridled nihilistic sexual hedonism the gamesters preach is not always to their liking.  Then we have the hypocrisy of “game” advocates always throwing their “Christianity” in our face, as if their lifestyle is in any way even remotely compatible with even the most modern dilution of authentic Christian belief.  I can honestly say that in my entire life I have never met even one genuine Christian; as Nietzsche wrote – there was only one Christian and he died on the cross.

“Based” Tulsi.  Gee…the Woman on Green Pepe Syndrome hit a snag real fast, eh?

Wrong, wrong, they’re always wrong.

Leftist lies on race, this from The NY Times, a racist media outlet who hired White-hating genocidal Asian bigot (or, more simply – “Asian”) Sarah Jeong:

People who live in a place today often bear no genetic resemblance to people who lived there thousands of years ago, so the idea that something in your blood makes you meaningfully Spanish is absurd.

Hmm… is that why Otzi the Iceman is genetically most similar to modern Europeans?  Is that why ancient DNA analyses typically puts those samples closest to their modern day counterparts than to, say, people halfway across the globe?  How about a bet?  I’d say that the genomes of ancient Britons are genetically more similar to the modern English than they are to, say, Nigerians.  If I’m wrong, I’ll admit it right here.  If I’m right, the author of the NY Times piece will agree to resign his position and get a swastika tattooed on his forehead.  Fair bet?

What You Sow So Shall You Reap

The chickens have come home to roost, as Malcolm X would say.

“This time it’s war,” declared the Le Parisien daily, as France’s media reacted with horror but determination after Friday’s wave of attacks that left at least 120 dead.

Yes, it is war.  The problem you see is that only one side is fighting it. When only one side fights a war, the other side inevitably loses. Yes, I know that is common sense, but with the shockingly inferior pile of biomass known as “the White race,” the most simple declarations of self-interest have to be carefully explained as if one were talking to a small child.

Centre-right daily Le Figaro took up a similar theme, splashing with the headline “War in central Paris” amid scenes of carnage at several locations in the French capital.

Well, you’ve been importing millions of enemy soldiers. Yes, it is war.

Many papers called for unity in the country that is still reeling from jihadist attacks in January that claimed 17 lives.“In the name of the true martyrs of yesterday, the innocent victims and in the name of the Republic, France will be able to stay united and stand together,” said Le Parisien.

Such statements are exactly the reason why this incident occurred in the first place. What France needs now is not “unity.”  You don’t need “unity” with those attacking you and killing you. You don’t need “unity” with those demographically replacing you. You don’t need “unity” with politicians who promote native French genocide. What you do need is DISUNITY, a second French Revolution that would make the first look like a calm parliamentary debate by comparison.

The “terrorist barbarism” has crossed a “historic line,” said the head of the left-leaning Liberation daily, calling for France to stay resolute.

To be “resolute,” all “left-leaning” Frenchmen need to be put on trial, you know, like Louis XVI. And with the same outcome.

“It is impossible not to link these bloody events with the battles raging in the Middle East. France is playing its part there. It must continue to do so without blinking,” wrote Laurent Joffrin in an editorial.

Joffrin, you stupid, despicable, pathetic, mendacious bastard, let me rewrite that for you:

It is impossible not to link these bloody events with mass immigration and multiculturalism in France. France is destroying itself. It must not continue to do so, and must take purge the nation of aliens without blinking.

After Rotherham and Charlie Hebdo I made predictions:
More immigration, more Muslims, more “hate laws” against native nationalists, more multiculturalism, more surrender.
And I was right. We are in the midst of a “refugee” invasion of Europe by the same folk that France is “at war” with in the “Middle East.”  Expect that the reaction to the Paris atrocity to be:
More immigration, more refugees, more Muslims, more surrender, more legal persecution of the Front National (which may well be outlawed), more laws restricting native activism, more concern about a non-existent “backlash,” more praise for “unity” and “diversity” and “multiculturalism,” and more talk about fighting in “the Middle East” rather than fighting in the streets of France, where the enemy actually is.
This blog is, of course, a pacifistic trumpet of humanitarianism, non-violence, and tolerance. Of course – and let there be no doubt whatsoever! – that this blog abhors and denounces any and all forms of violence, and instead calls for a calm inter-faith and inter-ethnic dialogue to resolve these issues. No doubt. But, speaking purely hypothetically, we can ask – if the native French ethny were healthy, how would they react to this?  Well, the same way a healthy British population would have reacted to Rotherham: by rampaging through the streets, butchering the immigrant communities, hanging the politicians, and setting up a far-right racial nationalist revolutionary government. This blog of course opposes any such actions, which would be horribly horrendous and inappropriate. Just saying that describes what a normal and healthy reaction would be.  No need to worry about it. Whites are so pitifully weak, so subhumanly inferior, and so devoid of any dignity or self-respect that they will grovel and surrender, and so set themselves up for the next such incident.

The Dodo Bird was infinitely more superior – from the standpoint of biological adaptive fitness – than the lowly White race is today.