Category: watchdog groups

White Nationalism, Free Speech, and Legitimacy

Defending White nationalism.

Recent events paint a dark picture for White nationalism.  Censorship.  Deplatforming. The Left-Corporate Alliance.  Government persecution.  Congressional hearings attempting to label White nationalism as akin to domestic terrorism, part of a global terror threat. The ability of leftist thugs – supporting by Big Business and by the Political Establishment – to attack rightists with impunity.

Now, the paradigm equating White nationalism with terrorism is absurd, and others have cogently pointed out that the “data” supporting that paradigm is, at best, flawed, and, more likely, intentionally mendacious.

And, of course, this is all highly hypocritical, since the real violence mostly comes from the Left. Thus, while leftists assert that “words are literally violence,” they ignore the actual global leftist terror network that attacks rightists – even political candidates – and they are careful not to apply the same standards of guilt by association to Islam or to Black activists. 

Indeed, if the government wants to investigate a global terror threat, they’d be better off concentrating on Burger King – an international corporation that encouraged the use of its products for political violence in the UK – rather than on a small handful of relatively powerless and underfunded White racialists.

But we have to understand that this is all about criminalizing an ideology. All else is merely an excuse. That is why an insulting letter to an alien congresswoman is considered “terrorism,” while Richard Spencer being physically attacked in the street because of his political views is not.  Who?  Whom?

Yes, there have been some isolated instances of White nationalist violence. However, White nationalist terrorism – to the extent it actually exists – is due to White nationalists not being allowed to participate in the political process (politics broadly defined). The repression censorship, deplatforming, leftist attacks, etc., are the cause of Far Right violence, not its consequences.  Any objective and sane understanding of cause and effect and an honest appraisal of the order of events clearly demonstrates that manifold instances of political repression and social pricing, over decades, have left some White nationalists desperate and with no confidence whatsoever that their concerns can be effectively addressed via legal political processes.  Thus, some engage in foolish acts.

Thus, it is obvious that suppressing the non-violent expression of Far Right ideas will only cause more (not less) violence coming from that direction. Now, unintelligent Arab congresswomen and moronic Puerto Rican congresswomen are likely too stupid to understand this, but the Jews behind the scenes surely must.  The latter are callously setting the stage for more violence and more victims in order to justify further repression. The brown puppets blathering in public are just for show.

One can argue that Suvorov’s Law of History – the observation that revolutions do not occur during the period of greatest repression but when that repression is suddenly relaxed – is one reason why the System dares not let up on its repression of the Far Right (see more below).  Be that as it may, the point still holds that the sporadic outbursts of Far Right violence are due to the pre-existing repression. Relaxing the repression may cause “revolution” but that “revolution” can be social and political; it does not have to include violent terrorism.  If the concern is with terrorism rather than simply the success of Far Right ideas, then more repression will cause more terrorism (likely leading to more repression, etc.).  If the Left was sincere about avoiding violence and terrorism from the Right, then they’d lessen the repression. That they want to increase the repression reveals their true motives – at least the true motives of the wirepullers behind the scenes.

And we must also consider the association between legitimacy and political participation, a participation that requires free speech and free assembly, both of which are incompatible with the criminalization of any ideology. Even some mainstream and/or leftist commentators understand that free speech and open political participation are tied to System legitimacy.  If you want people to accept the legitimacy of the outcome of the political and social process, then you must allow them free and unfettered participation in that process. That includes them expressing their views, organizing (meetings, conferences, activist groups, political parties), engaging in the electoral process as candidates, and not having their views labeled as “terrorism.”  Let’s consider what a legal scholar with a Jewish surname has to say on the issue of free speech and legitimacy, emphasis added:

Ironically, however, hate speech restrictions can undermine the legitimacy of antidiscrimination laws, both in terms of their popular acceptance but even more crucially with respect to the morality of their enforcement. For instance, laws forbidding people from expressing the view, as is the case in several European jurisdictions, that homosexuality is immoral or disordered, can destroy the moral justification of enforcing laws against sexual orientation…Conversely, the ability of Americans to freely oppose antidiscrimination laws by publicly expressing bigoted ideas about groups protected by these laws strengthens the legitimacy of enforcing these provisions even when doing so infringes upon deeply held religious convictions….I have argued that by impairing the opportunity for dissenters to participate as equals in the public debate about such matters as race, ethnicity, immigration, and sexual orientation, hate speech laws and public order provisions in force in many liberal democracies have significantly diminished political legitimacy, in both the descriptive and normative sense. Specifically, for those inhibited by these laws from expressing their opposition to antidiscrimination measures, these upstream speech restrictions have diminished, and in some instances may have destroyed, their political obligation to obey these downstream laws. Even more troubling, these inhibitions on equal political participation may have in some cases rendered immoral what would have otherwise been a moral use of force to make these dissenters comply with these antidiscrimination laws.

Let me again remind you that the people talking about “domestic terrorism” have the real objective of criminalizing an ideology. They are not really concerned about “acts of violence,” such acts coming to a significant degree from their side of the political divide and of which they say nothing.  In the end, and as shown by the censorship and deplatforming, it is really an issue of free speech, public assembly, and the right to organize on the basis of White racial interests. Thus, what Weinstein writes is wholly appropriate – the issue has always been whether someone like Taylor, Spencer, or Johnson can have a public forum; whether or not shooting up a synagogue is “domestic terrorism” is merely a smokescreen. After all, let us follow this logic to its natural conclusion.  Mr. Inner Hajnal Nutzi shoots up a synagogue, claiming White nationalism as a reason.  Domestic terrorism!  Then anyone who supports White nationalism, writes or speaks in favor of it, donates to it, etc. is a supporter of domestic terrorism and, hence, a criminal.  An ideology criminalized.  QED. Of course, no one would apply the same standards to Islam or the Left, but we understand it is all about power and not about fairness or the rule of law.

And, speaking as a (law abiding) White nationalist myself, I can assure one and all that, yes, I consider the System and its edicts as completely illegitimate, and that I follow those edicts only under coercion.  I assume many Whites – including civic nationalist types and other on the Right – believe and act the same. There is a widespread legitimacy problem for the System and it will only grow as the repression continues.  In the short term, the System can simply use coercion to enforce its edits and ignore the issue of legitimacy.  That’s likely not sustainable in the long run. Keep in mind that by saying this I am not saying “victory is inevitable,” I’m not one of the grifters trying to “white pill” supporters in order to ensure that the “D’Nations” continue.  I’m predicting eventual chaos and collapse, not victory.  As the USSR demonstrated, a System that has lost legitimacy is headed for collapse, even with coercion.  As a last resort, they loosen the chains of repression to salvage what they can, and, according to Suvorov’s Law of History, that sudden relaxation of repression heralds the final disintegration.  Alternatively, an illegitimate System can try and maintain the repression, and find that significant fractions of the population adopt passive aggressive disinterest in response, undermining social cohesion and political effectiveness. In the case of the USA, it will be precisely the most productive elements of the population that will begin to exhibit a tacit withdrawal and subtle subversion, making eventual decline and possible collapse even more likely.

Some will object – what about Europe?  They have repressive speech codes and aren’t the national governments there considered legitimate by the people?  First, I can’t speak for rightist Europeans – it is very possible that the growth of populism there is indicative of a growing element that does indeed consider the System illegitimate. And, second, the USA, with its particular history of, and alleged commitment to, free speech, is expected to exhibit a much stronger association between free expression and political legitimacy than do nations that have histories of kings, dictators, strongmen, and laws against lese majeste. What about the argument that European nationalists have had success despite the speech codes there?  What success?  In some nations, there has been a temporary slowdown in the degeneration, which can be quickly reversed by any subsequent leftist government; at best, there have been victories by civic nationalists and moderate petty nationalists.  The “grand success” in Europe is a figment of the Nutzi imagination.  And I can turn the argument around – imagine how much more successful the European Right could be if they could actually express their real views without fear of being fined or jailed?

So, no, the pathetically flimsy “successes” in Europe – which in any case have limited relevance to the American situation – in no way disprove the thesis put forth here.  Given the concerns of White nationalists, the situation in Europe remains dire. Demographic replacement is still “baked into the cake” there. Can European nationalists freely and frankly discuss these concerns?

And we must remember that the concerns of White nationalists are real; in fact, not only are they real, but they are the most important concerns of all, dealing as they do with the ultimate interests of national existence and genetic continuity.  Whites are in demographic and cultural eclipse, and will become minorities even in their historic European homelands. The United Nations openly advocates “replacement migration” targeting White nations (while Whites are told, at the same time, that any mention of that is “conspiracy theories”).  Whites are the only people on Earth not allowed to organize on the basis of racial self-interest; indeed, in majority White nations this expression of racial self-interest is either already criminalized or subject to social pricing (that is not good enough, it seems for the American Left, as they are now pushing for criminalization).  How is this repression consistent with legitimacy?  Obvious, it is not.  The System simply has no effective argument against the basic premises of White nationalism; therefore, it must use coercion.  However, as argued above, political coercion in the context of “democracy” is illegitimate and will erode the basis for peoples’ willingness to invest in the collective good.

Finally, I have to note that one major reason why White nationalism has reached such a sorry state of powerlessness and repression is the utter failure of its leadership.  The inept affirmative action leadership coupled to defective followers have squandered endless opportunities, and smeared White nationalism with the stench of failure – made more laughable by the endless cries of some of them that we are “moving to victory,”

And some of the leadership have no sensible understanding of the animating mindset of the censors.  For example, it is hard for me to express in words how absolutely foolish Richard Spencer is being here.

How naive can you be to actually believe the System will ever definitively and carefully – much less permanently – clearly state speech codes that can then be worked around.  Let me tell you the obvious – the only speech they want from WNs is silence.  No matter how you try and get around their speech codes, they’ll just keep on changing them to justify censoring you. They will forbid more and more words, and once that becomes untenable, they’ll just forbid “tones” and “implications” – all decided upon arbitrarily to achieve their political goals. It’ll be the race of the Red Queen and you can never win – it’s the gatekeepers of access who will have the power to determine what is acceptable or not. Once there are speech codes that are accepted as a part of society, nothing stops those codes from being constantly fine-tuned to silence opposition.

The only speech code that you can “work around” is NO speech code. You need either a platform that cannot be or will not be censored and/or an extension of “protected class” to include sociopolitical beliefs – with the former being more realistic than the latter.  The idea that the System is going to finalize a set of speech codes that would enable anything other than mild civic nationalism (if even that) is absurd.  Of course, Spencer may claim he is only talking in theory, but advocating for speech codes in theory (however unrealistic) is not anything anyone on our side should be doing.

The future looks grim and I have no easy answers. But I do know that asking for a more snug fit for our memetic straightjacket is not the answer. This is not an athletic contest between gentlemen, with both sides playing by the rules.  The System will continue trying to change the rules in the middle of the game in order to win. The only weakness they have is that the game has spectators, the White masses, and while these are mostly inert, they are not all completely inert. The System’s ability to “cheat” is constrained by their need to appear to be playing fair, to trick the rubes into believing the “free democratic America” still exists.  Thus gives our side some room to maneuver. Begging for better defined constraints is not the direction our maneuver should be going.

Strom on the new wave of censorship.

And what has happened to Mr. Moderation, the wonderfully pureblood Common Sense Counselor?

This account has been terminated due to multiple or severe violations of YouTube’s policy prohibiting hate speech.

Chastising extremists over how they talk about the Jews didn’t really help you, did it?

Advertisements

Counter-Selection by the System

In bed with the System as well as with the Press.

Let us assume for the sake of argument that a particular incident took place.  Thus, let us consider the following scenario, including several premises:

1. A prominent “movement leader” is a complete incompetent, wrecking the group of which he is head.  However, he is acceptable to the rank-and-file for all the usual reasons.

2. This leader does something unpleasant that would make the rank-and-file lose respect and confidence in him and endanger his status as leader.

3. This “something” is known by the authorities and is eventually adjudicated – in criminal or civil court, it doesn’t matter – locally, so the “movement” in general does not know about it.

4. This is the crucially important point – the watchdog groups – with all their spies, infiltrators, resources, and connections to the authorities, undoubtedly know about the “something.”  How could they not?

5. And most important of all – knowing about the “something,” the watchdog groups inexplicably stay silent about it, protecting the “leader” and his reputation among “movement activists.”

If we accept all of these premises, then the question arises WHY did the watchdog groups protect the “leader” about the incident in question?  Two possibilities. The less likely is that the “leader” is actually working for the watchdog groups, and just like the FBI will protect a mob informant or an undercover agent from the local authorities, the watchdog groups wanted to protect their “man in place” in the “movement.” But, as I said, that is unlikely.  By far the more likely explanation revolves around premise 1 – the person in question was an absolute incompetent and was driving the “movement” into the ground. Why do anything that would threaten that inept “leadership?”  Why take the chance (admittedly unlikely in Der Movement, but still) of someone more competent replacing this individual?  Better to leave him in place to wreck racial activism, and serve as an effective bogeyman for watchdog group fundraising, than to expose what is described in premise 2.  So the “watchdogs” kept silent, and enjoyed the resultant chaos.

Moving on from that (Hypothetical? Real?) scenario of the WN 1.0 past, let us now consider the situation in the WN 2.0 “movement” over the past few years.  The System, the Mass Media, focus on, and elevate in status, the most incompetent (relatively speaking) of “movement leaders.”  

Let me put aside my ideological and personal disagreements with these people and just rank them in relative terms.  I see the most competent and persuasive person being Taylor. But note that Spencer gets exponentially more attention than does Taylor. Johnson is perhaps equal to Spencer in competence but less so than Taylor, and Johnson gets more attention that Taylor but significantly less than Spencer.  MacDonald is maybe one million times more effective and competent than Heimbach – but who has received more attention from the media?  David Duke always got more attention than William Pierce, and the latter was a more effective and disciplined organizer and ideologue.  Rockwell got more attention than Carto. You can talk about “personality” and a “flashy and aggressive style” as explanations, but that only goes so far.

Lest I get accused of “low information moralizing” – yes, I know that, for example, in the past Taylor was a guest on a variety of TV talk shows.  I would like to point out three things about that. First, it was years ago, long before Trump, long before the System become overly paranoid about White restlessness and resistance. Giving Taylor that attention was a mistake on their part; will they do the same today?  Two, they made that mistake because they didn’t understand how sane and articulate Taylor would appear on TV. They may have assumed that they could bait him into frothing at the mouth and giving spastic Dr. Strangelove salutes.  Third, the attention given to Taylor then is a miniscule fraction of that given to the Alt Right heroes of today, what with the larger presence of the Internet and with social media.  And, yes, Pierce was on 60 Minutes – an attempt to tie him and The Turner Diaries to the Oklahoma City bombing, an interview that took place two decades before the Trump candidacy, an interview that pales in comparison to today’s coverage of the Alt Right. So, my basic argument still holds.

One can productively speculate that the System intentionally focuses media attention on the more inept and/or bizarre elements of “movement leadership,” while starving the more effective elements of attention.  That applies to ideas as well as people.  The more stupid the idea – endorsing Tulsi Coconut or Andy Eggroll for example – the more attention it will receive from the Press.  That’s not by accident.

I’ve talked to people who grew up under communism in Eastern Europe.  After the changes, and the secret police files were opened, it was found that many dissident groups were “controlled opposition.”  Infiltrators were in many cases running the show.  In some cases, infiltrators actually founded the show – the secret police themselves organized a fake opposition to the regime so as to identify, manipulate, and compromise the authentic opposition, and to create a useless safety valve for discontent,

Whether or not that is occurring in the West today as regards the Far Right, at minimum we have a situation in which the System is taking what we can assume is an authentic dissident opposition and intentionally boosting the public profile and leadership credentials of the more incompetent, so as to fill the leadership niche space with the inept, and thus preventing the emergence of a competently effective dissident leadership.

The System is utilizing negative selection – counter-selection – to ensure that the “movement” is led by failures.  The “movement’s” affirmative action policy fits very well here.  After all, the System is well aware of “movement” fetishism – remember Hermansson gloating that HopeNotHate intentionally picked a Swede as an infiltrator so as to appeal to Nordicist instincts. In Siege, Mason talks about how the infiltrator sent to attempt to compromise him was of a racial type meant to appeal to WN archetypes.  Similarly, the System will carefully boost the credentials of the “right” types, what is required is a combination of racial bonafides as well as gross incompetence. Thus, while Taylor has the racial bonafides, he is too competent to be a focus of too much media attention.  Instead, the attention has to be focused more on Beavis-and Butthead sniggering, freaks, perverts, proven failures, etc.

So, yes, “The Press” – in conjunction with “movement” fetishism – will choose your leaders.  


Enjoy the ensuing never-ending failure.  After all, “The Press” couldn’t accomplish this without your very willing acquiescence.  You have met the enemy and he is you. Enjoy.

Joan of Arc(hed Eyebrows)

And Spencer’s elbowing.

Another Greg Johnson Joan of Arc here.

Yeastbucket express!  Diabetes?  Is the yeast feeding off the excess sugar?

Excellent gamester comment:

The question of women boils down to aptitude, Women’s Aptitude. How skilled are they really?
Historically, most men thinkers have slammed women’s ability to think. There have been a lot of ways to categorize this, from “they’re like children” to “they’re intellectual copycats”. But I think the best way is this:
When I go around in my life, I listen to other people talking. Countless times I’ve heard guys discussing things like computers, business, music. I can’t recall ONCE — NOT ONCE — hearing two women discussing a world of ideas. If the world of ideas is a beach with waves of thought coming in, women are far inland in the jungle.

In this thread, the Left tries to justify “punching a Nazi.” The questions I would ask them are as follows. Since even leftist “watchdog” groups label the Nation of Islam and the New Black Panther Party as “hate groups,” how come no Antifa heroes ever attempt to sucker-punch (or elbow) a Black nationalist leader? How come they don’t try and break up a Black nationalist meeting or rally? How come they don’t physically confront all those “Black Israelites” screaming on street corners?

Cutting through the hand-waving (or silence), the answer to all those questions is two-fold. First, the violent left is not against “hatred, bigotry, and fascism” – they are simply anti-White.  Second, and more importantly, they are rightfully afraid. They know if they try any of that they’ll get a big Black fist in the face (likely worse), and, after they get out of the hospital, the same “White supremacist system” that ignores or supports attacks against the likes of Spencer would indict, convict, and imprison them for assaulting a Negro leader, after which they can end up in the prison hospital for surgery to repair a torn anal sphincter.

So, no viral videos of Black nationalists being elbowed in the face.  So how about this – NO ONE gets elbowed or sucker-punched or whatever for expressing their political opinions?  I mean, yes, for now, the System protects its street shock troops, but no one can say what the future holds.  Think of it as enlightened self-interest.

Advice for Der Movement Part I

Important advice.

I have written about before about pathetic apostates from White nationalism, many of whom now shill for “watchdog groups,” and/or who now run their own “anti-hate” groups, and who like to promote the meme that WNs are “troubled people” with “deep personal problems” who “join the movement because they are searching for a sense of belonging” – you know the whole song and dance by now.  Of course, this description never is applied to non-White racial activists, but no matter.  These shilling apostates are typically people who used to be Type I nitwits, and who claim they become “freed from hate” once “they met a good Black person and realized that not all non-Whites were bad” – as if a ludicrously retarded idea that “all Whites good, all non-Whites bad” actually reflects the reality of authentic White racialist thought, and that the writing of a Taylor or a Johnson or a MacDonald (regardless of my own personal disagreements with those gentlemen) actually conflates with such a simpleton’s view of the racial question.

To the extent these apostates are being honest, and not mendaciously parroting System lies, it is obvious that what they are doing here is projection. Their description of the “lonely, troubled, searching White youth desperately looking for meaning” is actually a self-description.  It is THEY who joined the “movement” for all the wrong reasons, it is THEY who were the flotsam and jetsam of White society, and is THEY who were easily peeled away from racial activism because they never really believed in it to begin with.  THEY joined because of their own personal defects; THEIR “activism” and subsequent “leaving the movement” reflects on THEM, not on racial activism itself. The reality of race, the racial question, the reality of race replacement and White genocide – these realities exist independent of the psychological problems and social maladjustments of Type I retardates.

Having said all of that, there is another take on the issue. Someone recently told me about a comment made by a CEO of some company, in which the CEO basically said: “At our company the employee comes first, the customers second.  If you have happy and satisfied employees, they will do a good job and satisfy the customer; if you don’t, no amount of ‘the customer comes first’ rhetoric will do the job.”  I am also thinking of a young activist I know long ago during my own (young) analog activist days. This person, who eventually dropped out (but who insofar as I know never became an apostate; he simply dropped out), once complained to me about his fellow racial activists – “they don’t care about me as a person, they are not my friends, all they care about is the work I do for the organization.”

I do not believe this is the same person, but the general attitude is the same.

Let’s consider that complaint in the context of, first, the apostate spiel, and, second, the CEO idea. Now, the person’s complaint is not the same as the apostate meme. The person in question, based on what I observed, was a sincere activist, with a good understanding of the issues.  He did not join primarily “to belong to something.”  However, having joined, he wanted to be respected and valued as a person, and he wanted a feeling of comradeship – he wanted normal human company (something sadly lacking in the “movement”). Now, me, I’m a cold person, am not interested in “being buddies” with other racial activists, and, to be honest, the attitude behind the complaint is alien to my nature.  But I can understand it on a purely intellectual level, although I never shared those feelings. But this person’s dropping out was a real loss. He was a good activist, a fine fellow; I respected him. But as I’ve been disgusted with the “movement” – albeit for different reasons – I can understand his situation. The only thing is that this fellow made the mistake many do – they equate Der Movement with racial activism, so for them dropping out of the former means dropping out of the latter. That does not have to be so.

This gets back to the CEO’s ideas.  If you want your endeavor to be successful, first you have to take care of your employees.  Then you care for the customers.  By analogy, in racial activism, the activists are the employees, and the White masses (or at least that fraction that is reachable) are the customers.  It’s true that Der Movement treats activists shabbily – with all the feuding, warring, aberrant behavior, defectives, unpleasantness, Quota Queen Incompetence and undependability, ethnic fetishism and hostility, etc. 

So, while a “sense of belonging” should NOT be the fundamental reason for becoming an activist, there is no harm – and much gain – in creating an authentic movement that can create such a sense of belonging for activists.  You want to retain quality activists, just like a company wants to retain quality employees. While it is true that genuine racial activists, who really understand the problem of race, are not going to become anti-racist leftist apostates against racial activism, it is possible that they will drop out (while still retaining their core beliefs).  And if these dropouts are quality people, the damage will be enormous because there are so few such people to begin with; racial activism lacks a critical mass of such people and can ill afford to blithely go along its merry way, alienating such people on a constant basis (as does occur).

There has to be mechanisms for improving the activist experience. Now, of course, that is not the fundamental priority.  People need to understand that racial activism is not there for personal fulfillment.  But activists should not be gratuitously offended, alienated, disgusted, insulted, etc. – which is what often happens.  Comradeship should occur.

A good start is to eliminate some of the more egregious examples of negative and alienating behavior and outcomes; after that, one can think about adding positives.  Eliminating negatives – how about cutting back on the feuding?  The acceptance of Beavis-and-Butthead lulzing trolling?  How about making sure meetings are not so easily infiltrated?   How about not having homosexuals hitting on young men at meetings?  How about being up front about your ingroup, and then not tolerating ethnic fetishist attacks against people you accept in your group?  You know, the time to decide on whether or not someone belongs is BEFORE they join, not AFTER, not after they’ve invested months or years of work for you and your group.  The very definition of a group is the dividing line between in/out and any group that can’t even decide on something absolutely fundamental to its existence is not really any sort of viable group at all.

I’m sure the fearless leaders of the “movement” can think of many areas of improvement with respect to the issues broached in this post.  Being a real leader means being able to make good use of the human material at hand; it means valuing people who are indeed valuable. When you have something valuable you want to retain it and make good use of it, not toss it in the rubbish heap on a whim.

Der Movement Marches On

In der news.

Notice the discussion of Trump’s incompetence, cowardice, and fraud at the podcast here.  The last chance for White America!  MAGA!  Pepe!  Kek!  Now, who can tell you – “I told you so?”  Also,recommending AIM – discuss it on Disqus.

So much winning!  Based Poland!  Outer Hajnal! Wrong, wrong, they’re always wrong.

That said, of course I oppose and denounce this despicable treatment of Taylor. This is yet another example why I am a skeptic about White survival, why I am a pessimist, and why I laugh at the delusional who debate whether our majestic victory will be soon or in fifty years.  Cultured, non-violent, and well-educated White advocates like Taylor are banned by conservative governments – and the optimism brigade are “emboldened” and “confident of victory.”  No, things are worse than ever.

All of these things – the constant banning, deplatforming, etc. one occurring right after the other – are indications of the dire need for the Far Right to get involved in politics, broadly defined. There has to be a serious, dedicated, long term effort to gain sufficient power in society so as to make the social and political costs for the System of these anti-White attacks outweigh the benefits.  Right now, it’s all benefit for them, at virtually no cost.

Politics broadly defined includes, but is definitely not limited to, electoral politics.  It includes infiltration of the System and of various mainstream organization and entities.  It includes credible and convincing propaganda that evades censorship – another reason why political campaigns are useful.  Sure – the System could in theory censor and ban political campaigns here in America, but at what cost?  They have to at least put up a credible pretense that this is a “democracy” and not an out-and-out banana republic.  Force them to make that choice.  Politics includes more overt organizing, it means lobbying in DC, and, yes, it includes so-called “metapolitics” – but a metapolitics that aims at real social and cultural influence, not mere tin cup panhandling for “D’Nations.”

We’ll be told it is “impossible.”  No, it is very possible, and the perfect opportunity was right after Trump’s election, where the niche space for right-wing populism was wide open. Then, plans should have been laid for targeted electoral campaigns for 2018 and 2020.  Infiltration, lobbying, and organizing should have commenced.  But no.  Instead we got Unite the Right, drunken podcasts, and people dressed like Batman brawling in the streets. Job well done!  And as far as the “there’s no money” excuse goes, do I really need to link to the Brimelow-and-Derbyshire-sitting-on-the–lawn-chairs picture again? The money is, and has been, there.  It has just been wasted supporting the “leaders” in their blue state lifestyles.

Retarded Anglocentric fetishist attacks Yockey, blames everything on the “Papists.” Next we’ll debate the virtues of William Henry Harrison as a Presidential candidate.  Keeping up with the times!

True enough, if forced to make a choice, I prefer streamlined and straight-talking Protestantism, as exemplified by the (fictional but representative) sermon of Father Mapple to the ornate and superficial ceremonial foppery of Catholicism or the icon-saturated mysticism of Orthodoxy.  Moral content is useful, empty ritual is not.  But the “moral content” of today is merely warmed over Marxism.  

So, really, who can take any of this Christianity and its petty sectarian feuds seriously in the 21st century? That anyone today makes an issue of this demonstrates their childish stupidity.

And even if you do not really believe, but instead assert that religion is a useful social lubricant, the churches have long since been taken over by the enemy.  We’ll be told that this is because the current state of Christianity is a “perversion of the true faith.” And what is the “true faith?” Religion has always been a reflection of the Zeitgeist of the times. The “true faith” has always had sociopolitical implications.  In reality, it has always been downstream of politics – again, politics very broadly defined.  You have to change the politics to get your precious “true faith” back – if you are so stupidly childish as to want it.  And you don’t do that by behaving as if you’re at a meeting of the Know Nothing Society, ranting about “Papists.”  

When reading this, all I can think of is this.

The Bush family marches on.

Chaos at the compound, but they can still advise Facebook to get WNs deplatformed.

Also note:

Chinese-American and former First Woman Michelle Obama’s Chief of Staff Tina Tchen has been brought in to clean up the Jewish snakepit at the SPLC. Ms. Tchen specializes in examining “workplace cultural compliance,” especially “gender and racial equity, and sexual harassment.” She just finished helping to get all the charges against the part-Jewish mulatto homosexual hate crime hoaxer Jussie Smollett dropped in Chicago.

The Arctic Alliance marches on, eh, Derb?  Once again we observe the Asian as part of the Rising Tide of Color against Whites.  Once again we see that the existential meaning of Asians is hatred of Whites.  Once again we see that the HBDers are traitors to the White race, who value Asia over Europe.  Hey, Kevin, when are you going to speak out against the Alt Wrong?


Despite my critiques of William Pierce, I believe that if Pierce was still alive – if he was one of those men who stay healthy and robust into their 90s – all of the stupidity we see in Der Movement today would not be taking place. I cannot believe that we would still experience the antics of the Spencers and Johnson’s among us if Pierce, with his gravitas and his status in the “movement,” was still around. Pierce, with his no-nonsense attitude would have lambasted the sort of juvenile stupidity WN 2.0 has graced us all with.  Pierce’s death left a huge gaping hole in the leadership niche space of Der Movement, and that space has been filled with substandard heirs.

Strom writes:

There should be no “freedom” to genocide us. No freedom of action for those who work against our very existence as a people and against our right to be captains of our own destiny. Any alien group which does that or which works toward that goal should not be here. Not leaving — and not ceasing such activities — would be regarded by a National Alliance government as an act of war. It is an act of war. Working in concert with such genocidal aliens, or working toward their goals of diminishing our presence and our power in our own homelands, would be a capital crime under a National Alliance government, and punished accordingly.

Kevin, doesn’t this apply to the Alt Wrong? The Alt Wrong is a self-declared Yellow Supremacist grouping, with close ties to Jewish interests, working against White freedom and White existence.  The HBD is a political movement dedicated to enslaving Whites to Jewish and Asian interests.  One prominent HBDer publicly advocated for Israel to conquer a European nation for use for Jewish living space. Kevin, would your mentor Pierce have tolerated the Alt Wrong/HBD crew?  When will you speak out against them?


The Whites in the crowd cheer.  So much winning!  Riposte to the simian – Europe is OUR homeland, not yours, you are an alien invader, an enemy, absolute vile low-life trash, please get the hell out of my ancestral continent. Thank you.


Very cognitive, very elite..


See this


And this.


And then there were all the “eggroll” cracks.  What happened to make Johnson jump on the Yang Gang train?  Was it just the desire to get “in bed with the press” and try and get credit for promoting UBI?  Or is the Alt Wrong/Alt Yellow manipulating behind the scenes?

The embarrassing Right.


Conspiracy theorists are another bunch of retards who should have no place in a sane and rational Right. Note to the nitwits – the real conspiracies, the ones that matter are not really conspiracies at all, they’re being done right out in the open.

But, no, let’s hear more about “moon landing hoaxes” and that “the moon is not really a physical object that can be landed on, it is a holographic image.”  Dat right!

Full Metal Jerkoff

Der Military.

Read this.  Excerpts below.

Leaked chat logs have connected seven current members of the U.S. armed forces to a white nationalist group, according to a HuffPost investigation.

For years, Identity Evropa members have used a server on Discord, a group chat app popular among the alt-right, to send messages to one another. 

Opsec?  Why?  Why use “a group chat app?”  And if you do use it, why discuss where you did ROTC, your school wrestling career, and what your Dad does for a living?

Last week the independent media collective Unicorn Riot published the contents of that Discord server in its entirety. 

How did this happen? Infiltrators? Discord itself? 

A largely anonymous network of anti-fascist activists…

Never any leaks, infiltrations, etc. from that direction.  Have you ever noticed that?

…reviewed the Discord logs, using biographical details mentioned…

Mentioned why? 

….by Identity Evropa members, most of whom posted under pseudonyms, to uncover their offline identities.

Building off that research, HuffPost verified the identities of seven men currently serving in the military. 

So, Huffpost is the media outlet for Antifa?

The Marine Corps, the Army, the Air Force and the Texas National Guard confirmed to HuffPost that the identified men were active members in those services. After HuffPost’s inquiries, the military is investigating some of the men’s possible ties to Identity Evropa….

So, essentially the Far Left works hand-in-glove with the military-industrial complex – just as we already know they work with globalist big business interests.

Kathleen Belew, the author of Bring the War Home: The White Power Movement and Paramilitary America, told HuffPost that white nationalists in our armed forces pose a clear danger. 

Gangbangers, Middle Eastern terrorists, dual loyalty foreigners…all of course pose no danger whatsoever.

The group has been working to infiltrate the GOP — one member won an uncontested seat on his local Republican Party committee — and recruit members on college campuses. A recent report from the Anti-Defamation League found that Identity Evropa’s campus flyer campaigns were partly responsible for record-setting levels of white supremacist propaganda spotted across America last year. 

In theory, that’s good.  Let’s give credit where credit is due (in theory, if not in practice). Infiltrating the System is a good idea.  You just have to work on secure communication and proper vetting.

Days after the chat logs were published, Identity Evropa’s leader, 29-year-old Patrick Casey, a resident of Virginia who rose to a leadership role after producing videos for a white nationalist site, announced a rebrand: Identity Evropa is now the American Identity Movement. 

That’ll fix the problem!  AIM!  Are we sure that doesn’t stand for Advanced Idea Mechanics? What’s MODOK’s cephalic index? Looks rather brachycephalic to me.  A no good Alpinid!

The problem was not with the name or symbolism, it  was, and still is, with the people, particularly the leadership.  Now, there is a worse name, worse symbolism, but the same failed leadership.  Surprise!

A list of the servicemen in Identity Evropa identified by HuffPost is below.

Members In The U.S. Marine Corps

Stephen T. Farrea…Jason Laguardia…

Shabbos sud stepandfetchits?  That’s not going to work out for you guys.  Experto crede.

A photo from a gathering of the American Identity Movement, originally called Identity Evropa, posted to Twitter in March 2019. Laguardia, a Marine, can be seen in the photo.

Posted to Twitter.  Why?

Col. Ted Wong, a spokesperson for the U.S. Marine Corps, told HuffPost in a statement that the branch is investigating Farrea’s and Laguardia’s connections to Identity Evropa. 

“There is no place for racial hatred or extremism in the Marine Corps. Our strength is derived from the individual excellence of every Marine regardless of background,” Wong said. “Bigotry and racial extremism run contrary to our core values. The Marine Corps will investigate the allegations and take the appropriate disciplinary actions if warranted.” 

After all, someone named “Wong” is just the person to tell White Americans what is or is not appropriate behavior in our armed forces.

Here’s a secret video of an Alt Right Marine Corps meeting.  The Blacks in attendance are members of the Yang Gang – or perhaps simply mistaken for wops and dagoes.

Lawrence of Eurabia referred to biographical information in his chats. 

Why?  For what purpose?  No one (legitimate) should have wanted to know any of it, and he shouldn’t have wanted to share it.

He said he is a member of the ROTC program at Montana State University in Bozeman and is in the Army National Guard. He also said that he was a wrestler in high school from a town in Montana and that his dad worked as a stonemason there. 

Why didn’t he just post his social security number, fingerprints, and retinal scan?

Those details match publicly available information about Jay C. Harrison, 20…

Well, you couldn’t have gotten any more detailed.

And the article continues in this vein, in more painful embarrassing detail.

Compare the advice given to young activists by Sallis to the Warrior of Walmart mocking the idea of people infiltrating the System and building infrastructures in depth.  Sallis – correct. The Quota Queens – wrong.

Now, you may say, but isn’t infiltration what IE was doing?  In theory, yes, in practice, no.  Moles are supposed to burrow deep, not cheerfully discuss the most minute details of their lives on Discord, pose in publicly available photos, etc.  That’s not infiltration.  That’s people setting themselves up to get infiltrated.

You want these guys in the military to either:

A) Rise through the ranks and be in a position to do good.  You want them to be the higher levels guys doing the investigating, not the lower level schlubs getting investigated.

B) Put in your time, get an honorable discharge, and use that military experience to train cadres, quietly, behind the scenes.

Sallis advises to build your careers and lives, take care of yourselves first, and infiltrate the System.  The Warrior or Walmart ridicules the idea of slow and patient infiltration – instead, mount the ramparts (dressed like Batman or Captain America or wearing a TWP t-shirt with Codreanu’s picture on it), and proclaim your allegiances to the rooftops.

As far as this military fiasco goes, those fellows are young and they really didn’t know any better.  The real fail here was with “movement leadership” who’ve been making the same types of mistakes over and over again.  

My advice to activists, particularly young ones, remains – at least for the time being, drop out of active participation in Der Movement (and that includes giving “D’Nations”). You can continue reading the blogs, educating yourself, keeping track of the “movement,” but concentrate on yourself and making your own life better.  To the extent possible burrow deep into the fabric of the System.  But don’t actively participate in anything, including meetings, until such time that competent leadership arises – finally!– to put things right.

And yes, there here is real funny.  Perhaps Hermansson would like to give a meeting keynote address on the dangers of Discord.

Friday Follies

Race and Der Movement.  In all cases, emphasis added.

The average reader may not know this, but Hela cells are often a big problem in the biomedical cell culture laboratory environment – the cells are aggressive and invasive (surprise!), resulting in significant cross-contamination of other, more unique and valuable, cell cultures.

However, 20 years after Henrietta Lacks’ death, mounting evidence suggested that HeLa cells contaminated and overgrew other cell lines. Cultures, supposedly of tissues such as breast cancer or mouse, proved to be HeLa cells. We describe the history behind the development of HeLa cells, including the first published description of Ms Lacks’ autopsy, and the cell culture contamination that resulted.

Many labs therefore want nothing to do with that cell line, in order to preserve the integrity – dare we say “purity?”- of their other cell culture stocks. Interesting analogies can be made to other, broader, societal, situations.

Good news.

I have two points to make about this.

First, we should not be surprised that Fukuyama preaches to Whites memes that will inevitably lead to their destruction.  As EGI Notes tells you time and time again: The existential meaning of Asians is hatred of Whites. 

Second, we see Greg once again engaging in the most outrageous and dishonest gaslighting – this time trying to convince you that WWI and WWII were not due to petty ethnonationalism, but a lack thereof.

You see, “WWI was not a war of nations, but of empires.” The empires did it!  It were all the South Asians of India, the Algerians of North Africa, the Egyptians, the Negroes of German South West Africa, the Siberians – they were the ones pushing the honest and humble ethnonationalists of Great Britain, France, the Turkish Ottomans, Germans, and Russians into war. It had nothing at all to do with the rise of German power, the British desire to thwart that power, French fear and hatred of Germany, Russia’s desire for power and influence and their ethnosubracial pan-Slavism, no sir!  It was dem dere empires dat done it, lordy yes!

At this point, the ethnonationalist riposte would be: Austria-Hungary!  Empire!  The Archduke!  The Serbs!  Empire caused the war!  

Does anyone really believe that the underlying cause of WWI was the assassination of some useless aristocratic parasite?  No – the great powers of Europe, which did NOT include the “sick men” of Austria-Hungary and the Ottomans – were primed for war, wanted war – because of their selfish, petty nationalist (or subracial-ethnic-cultural-petty nationalist in the case of Russia) interests. The young Europeans who cheered for war and volunteered in droves in 1914 did not do so because of “empire” or because of “the Archduke.” They did so out of national pride and because of a petty nationalist animus toward their fellow Europeans.

Therefore, the assassination was merely an excuse. The Austrian tail did not wag the German dog; the Serbian tail did not wag the Russian dog, and the British and French didn’t care one whit about “national determination” (they were “empires,” no?).  It was all an excuse for a petty nationalist war that was not caused by empires but that ultimately caused the end of those empires.

And, oh, yes, WWII occurred “because the ethnic boundaries were not properly drawn after WWI.” Right? Very good.  By that logic, Greg, your Saint Adolf should have stopped after uniting with Austria and getting the German part of Czechoslovakia.  Or are you going to tell us the invasion of Poland was really about the “Polish corridor?”  Yeah…and I have a bridge to sell you connecting Manhattan and Brooklyn. Hitler had his lebensraum aims that were completely ethnonationalist, or at least Germanic/Nordicist. Hitler wanted land from the Slavs and wanted revenge against the French. There was also an honest fear and loathing of Soviet communism – although that didn’t stop the Nazi-Soviet pact to destroy Poland.  The British were playing their usual game of preventing a continental power from emerging, and, again, the French feared and hated the Germans. And it was the petty nationalism of the British and French that prevented a pan-European alliance with Germany and Italy to destroy Soviet communism. The USSR had its own agenda, both of power politics and Marxist expansionism. Tell me – where in all of this was the war being caused by pan-European ideals?  By multi-national states?  And the only real link to “empire” here was the German (and Italian and Japanese) national desire for empire.  And did Great Britain fight the war “to save the empire?”  Hardly.  Hitler was willing to guarantee the existence of the British Empire, which he admired.  The British just wanted to destroy Hitler and Nazi Germany.  The same old “grand strategy” of Great Britain – which lost them their empire and resulted in the homeland being reverse colonized by the Third World.  Ethnonationalism!  Snug in your hobbit hole!

The facts – the clear historical facts – demonstrate that petty nationalism, ethnonationalism, caused both World Wars and wrecked the White World, and to argue otherwise, and to try and shift the blame to the opponents of petty nationalism, is an even greater act of outrageously despicable dishonesty than the previous Gaslighting Greg act of blaming the failure of WN 2.0 on those who eschewed and opposed WN 2.0.

I have no idea what happened to this guy Johnson; I think his hatred of Richard Spencer has unhinged his mind.

A commentator responds to Johnson:

Now, while I strongly believe in the practical value of ethnic homogeneity this is not always feasible. Also a myriad of small but homogeneous states without a certain supra-national structure will render them indefensible against the Asian Empires – Russia and China! And these two do know how to genocide. So again, an effete bureaucrat of EU Commission is a better choice (and probably the only one acceptable currently) in order to maintain the peace between not perfectly homogeneous states but also to prevent the Asian Empires expansion in Europe.
This structure was working in a certain degree until Angela Merkel blown it up by opening unilaterally the borders of Germany.
My hope is for a Union of all white peoples (Europe, US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and South Africa and a proper part of South America) each people living in its own state based on its historical right (defined genetically and culturally), but organized in a supra national white states entity; expulsion of all non-European populations and individuals, including the mixed race individuals. Common defense, common positions regarding the rest of the world. Free internal markets. Free circulation of ideas and goods. Limited people circulation.

That’s OK as far as it goes, but he should have critiqued Johnson’s initial premises.  For an ethnonationalist to blame WWI and WWII on “empires” and “multi-national states” is chutzpah of an order to make Dershowitz proud.  It’s disgusting.

Then we have the vile hypocrite Roissy, who laments this story, while he has previously bragged about one of his girlfriends offering “do you want to put it in my ass?”  I guess the blowback from the unbridled nihilistic sexual hedonism the gamesters preach is not always to their liking.  Then we have the hypocrisy of “game” advocates always throwing their “Christianity” in our face, as if their lifestyle is in any way even remotely compatible with even the most modern dilution of authentic Christian belief.  I can honestly say that in my entire life I have never met even one genuine Christian; as Nietzsche wrote – there was only one Christian and he died on the cross.

“Based” Tulsi.  Gee…the Woman on Green Pepe Syndrome hit a snag real fast, eh?

Wrong, wrong, they’re always wrong.

Leftist lies on race, this from The NY Times, a racist media outlet who hired White-hating genocidal Asian bigot (or, more simply – “Asian”) Sarah Jeong:

People who live in a place today often bear no genetic resemblance to people who lived there thousands of years ago, so the idea that something in your blood makes you meaningfully Spanish is absurd.

Hmm… is that why Otzi the Iceman is genetically most similar to modern Europeans?  Is that why ancient DNA analyses typically puts those samples closest to their modern day counterparts than to, say, people halfway across the globe?  How about a bet?  I’d say that the genomes of ancient Britons are genetically more similar to the modern English than they are to, say, Nigerians.  If I’m wrong, I’ll admit it right here.  If I’m right, the author of the NY Times piece will agree to resign his position and get a swastika tattooed on his forehead.  Fair bet?