More “movement” cluelessness.
Someone at Amren asks why it’s considered bad to say “I’m proud to be White.” There’s a number of reasons for that, some touched upon in that essay and some not. One thing’s for sure: Der Movement’s enthusiastic embrace of freakishness and hypocrisy of all kinds is not helping.
Speaking of hypocrites and Amren, here’s someone embraced by the Amren crowd.
Derbyfogle has the nerve to ask:
Well, all that is a problem for Chinese people. But why is it any problem for us?
And answers it:
I’ve been living among Chinese people for forty-five years. I’ve been married to one for thirty years.
Yeah, Derb, it is a “problem for us” because we have Chinese living in this country. You’ve contributed to the problem by bringing “Rosie” – who you yourself have admitted is an ethnocentric Chinese – to the USA. This guy’s mindnumbingly clueless hypocrisy is simply astounding.
But I love my country…
If you’re talking about England, then go back (sans “Rosie” and the kids, who can go to China or Taiwan) and try to help. As for America, you’re a former illegal alien who has contributed to the Chinese problem you are posting about, so “my country” should not apply for the USA.
German madness – Germany is “not a Western nation.” What stupidity is this? Some sort of “Red Fascism/National Bolshevik” nonsense to identity Germany to the East as a “young, non-Western” nation? As sane people are aware, Germany is one cornerstone of the West (along with the other major Western European nations identified by Yockey); indeed, Germans may have contributed more to Western culture (as defined by Spengler/Yockey) more than any other people.
I really do think Germans had a mass national nervous breakdown after losing WWI and the subsequent period of revolution, instability and inflation, and Weimer degeneration, and have been more or less crazy for the last 100 years or so, veering off from ultra-narrow hegemonic ethnonationalism to ultra-universal pathological altruism, with random nutcases in-between reinventing Western history. Der Movement had better get over its extreme Teutonophilia until such time that Germany recovers the mental equilibrium it had before November 1918.
Then we have this.
Yeah, the Alt Right can “distance themselves” from Milo all they want, but it’s too late. Milo and the Alt Right are one in the mind of the public, and the Alt Right can blame themselves for that, with all their talk about “a big tent” and “the usefulness of Milo and the Alt Lite” and “let’s not turn people away from us.” Net result: more people will end up being turned away than being attracted.
Then we have Roissy:
As a White man, I sense that war has been declared on me and my kind. When my enemies bring war to my doorstep, what am I to do?
Well, he has previously answered that for himself:
damn, i’m torn. do i want a thriving society or easier access to sex? yeeeeah… i’ll take the latter and leave the self-sacrifice required of the former for the anti-poolside chumps
Milo and Roissy are two sides of the same coin, one homo and the other hetero (with the exception of Roissy’s comically homoerotic fixation on Donald Trump). Both are sexual hedonists, snarky and juvenile “shock jock” types, on the periphery of Der Movement, generating self-aggrandizing controversy by flirting with Far Right ideas, but ultimately standing for values anathema to any sane ordering of White society. Both have influence because of the “big tent” stupidity of Der Movement, which sacrifices standards on the altar of expediency.
Then we have the Silk Roaders, who are becoming increasingly unhinged with their anti-Trumpism. They’ll be addressed in future posts – the only thing to say now for those of you who haven’t been paying attention is that their anti-Trumpism is ALL about Russia. The Jew/Israeli card is being played to try to appeal to Der Movement’s knee-jerk anti-Semitism. It is hypocrisy, because it we are to criticize everyone groveling to the Jews and Israel, this must include China, India, and all the other lands of the Asian gods.
I for one long ago identified Trump as a Negrophilic ignorant vulgar buffoon with strong Jewish family connections. But, he’s not part of Der Movement, is a public mainstream figure, so in this non-“movement” case expediency actually is justification. What effect does Trump have on White racial interests? He can be a useful tool. I’m certainly not going to be anti-Trump solely because Asian nationalists covet the Russian Far East.
The solution to “movement” madness? How about starting here?