Category: White behavior

A Heretical Thought About Williams Syndrome

Heretical at least from Der Movement’s perspective.

Previously this blog has discussedand extended, a hypothesis linking East Asian phenotypes with those of Down’s syndrome.  Many fruitful ideas came from that analysis (*).

Consider what Taylor talks about starting at 5:57 here.

So, analogous to Down’s Syndrome, can we speculate that certain ethnies mimic aspects of the Williams Syndrome phenotype, particularly with respect to the pathologically trusting and aracial aspects of Williams Syndrome patients’ behavior?

Who might such ethnies be, we wonder?  Perhaps, if they were alive today, John Lindsay and Hubert Humphrey could help us find an answer. Or maybe Taylor Swift can help us figure it out.

Is this scenario why some in Der Movement are so outraged over the term “pathological altruism” and try to deny that such a pathology exists? Does it hit too close to home?

After all, if Lynn can pathologize Negro behavior, and if Brand had no qualms about pathologizing wop behavior, certainly, in the name of “race realism” and “the pursuit of the truth,” we can pursue these other lines of inquiry.  We certainly don’t want Durocher to accuse anyone of “ethnic hurt feelings,” now, do we?

*Believe it or not, I just noticed right now where that Down’s Syndrome hypothesis originated. Too funny for words – except to say that the battle lines against Asian-worshipping HBD are being drawn quite clearly, are they not? I suppose Williams Syndrome is the behavioral distinction between those on either side of those lines (except for the ethnocentric Jews who push HBD for their own self-interest; I am really referring to the puppets who are easily manipulated by leering Levantines).

The U-Shaped Life Curve

Harsh reality.

Gee…I wonder why that is

…the most recent figures suggest that being black or Hispanic is nowadays associated with greater happiness.

When you are in the ascendant, when you see a bright racial future for your kind, when you are ever more victorious, of course you’ll be happy.  Whites are becoming like Native Americans – a defeated and despondent people.

Here’s the secret to the U-shaped life curve. Young people are happy because they are young – they have their whole lives ahead of them; they see unlimited opportunities; they are at the peak of health, vigor, and physical attractiveness.  Old people are happy because of delusion. The fear of impeding death causes them to over-compensate and engage in hysterical denial over the harsh reality of their decrepitude, as they desperately try to convince themselves that they are “happy.” Some are too feeble-minded to realize how terrible their life is, and was. Others may simply have become resigned to their fate, and come to terms with how empty and meaningless their existence has been, and still is. They all desperately try and grasp onto every moment of remaining life in denial of the inevitable fate that awaits them…awaits us all.  It is a form of demented hysteria born out of the sheer terror of death. Folks in their 50s, on the other hand, realize all they have lost and are losing and they harbor no delusions.  They are not yet suffering from the delusions of death-fear or of neurodegenerative dementia. They are immersed in the unrelenting bleakness of their utter despair; middle age is the sweet spot for enlightened misery. They’ve lost the best years of their life, they’ve often been cheated out of their life, had their lives essentially stolen from them, they’ve seen all their dreams and hopes destroyed, and they are living pathetic inauthentic existences merely and solely in order to make ends meet and to fulfill the expectations of others. They are miserable simply because they see harsh reality without blinders.  They may become particularly frustrated when they realize that while they do have some useful time left, circumstances prevent them from doing what they want to do with that time. They hate their lives and for good reason. Thus, sandwiched between youthful exuberance and elderly delusion is a period of soul-searing clarity.  Enjoy.

Ethnocentrism, Chinese Nationalist Maiden, Sex Strike

In der news.

Read this.

Prof. Dutton tries to explain the relatively low ethnocentrism of whites. One theory is that we have an evolutionary strategy based on producing geniuses. Exceptional people make breakthroughs that advance the interests of the group, but the type of environment that produces and supports such people is one of low conformity. This would decrease ethnocentrism. 

As he does in his earlier book, At Our Wits’ End, Prof. Dutton also argues that social changes connected with the Industrial Revolution have meant far less natural selection in industrialized populations since then. For most of history, children with maladaptive traits usually died, but now they often survive. This means harmful mutations stay in the gene pool. 

Prof. Dutton argues that ethnocentrism benefits groups in the struggle for survival, so natural selection has generally promoted it, whereas maladaptive attitudes such as very low ethnocentrism are the product of mutations. Mental and physical abnormalities due to genetic mutations are often found together, so that as the population is increasingly burdened with mutations affecting physical health, it may also be afflicted with reduced ethnocentrism, which reduces a population’s chances for long-term survival.

Is there an inverse relationship between degrees of ethnocentrism and the levels of such deleterious mutations?  This could be assayed. I avoid making comments about intra-European possibilities here, but the failures of Der Movement’s affirmative action “leadership” raises possibilities.

By the way, will Amren review Dutton’s book on Rushton?  Inquiring minds want to know.

Me so horny, me ruv you rong rong time:

Chinese Nationalist Maiden • 20 hours ago

I have witnessed for a long time that Whites are less ethnocentric than other races…

Is that why Whites let the likes of you live in their nations and infest their “pro-White” websites?

…and that is why I consistently try to increase White ethnocentrism.

By living in their nations.

I am not scared of White ethnocentrism. 

Really?  Even when your yellow rear end is kicked back to Hepatitis Land?

I agree with Kevin Macdonald’s view that Whites are unusually altruistic, which explains their weirdly low ethnocentrism. 

Exemplified by your presence at Amren.

However, I really hope Whites wake up soon because it is not good for the future of humanity if this planet becomes flooded with low-IQ peoples as low-fertility, high-IQ races, namely Whites and East Asians, decline. 

IQ, IQ, Asians have high, high IQ!  Asians are really declining, eh?  There are hundreds of millions more Chinese alone (a single Asian ethnic group) than there are all Whites combined, worldwide. Asians are in such “decline” that their excess population floods into White nations.

Currently, the East Asian demographic decline is inevitable due to low fertility. 

And if China loses half-a-billion people they’ll be down to where the entire White race is right now.

Together with Whites, we will be a dwindling minority in centuries to come…

Lie.

…and therefore we need a strategy for high-IQ peoples.

Whites enslaved to Asian interests.

However, idiots like Xi Jinping make sound racial thinking nigh to impossible in China…

Which is why the Chinese are fiercely nationalistic and are practicing eugenics.

…whilst the West is not being helped either by the liberals and (((rulers))) who wish for White genocide.

If the subtle sexual bait is not enough, there’s a (((little pretense))) of anti-Jewishness to whet Nutzi appetites.  Just like that Japatrix from Majority Rights.  It’s as if they are reading off the same script…which is probably the case.

Retarded wopess just confirmed to the world that all women are basically whores who use sex to control men.

MGTOW, my friends, MGTOW.

Those deceptive yeastbuckets.

More MGTOW.

A Message for Eric Kaufmann

A brief message.

Following up on this, we read this:

Eric Kaufmann was born in Hong Kong and raised in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. His ancestry is mixed with a quarter Chinese and a quarter Latino. His father is of Jewish descent…

So, the person advising on how to ease the anxiety of Whites so that they can be more easily (slowly) dispossessed and, eventually, race-replaced by mixed-race individuals, is himself mixed-race and half-Jewish. I’m shocked, shocked, I say.

So, here is a brief message for Kaufmann:

Dear Sir,

I do not know your level of sincerity concerning your work on White interests. Regardless, taken to its logical conclusion, and from your own words, the ultimate outcome of Whites following your advice is their slow but inevitable demographic eclipse and their race replacement by a mixed-race population.

I note that your own ancestry is described as “mixed with a quarter Chinese and a quarter Latino. His father is of Jewish descent.”  Even if we were to assume that the “Latino” is Euro-Iberian, then that still leaves 75% of your ancestry of non-European descent. Therefore, by the standards of those who most closely exemplify the pursuit of White interests you pontificate about, you are not “White.”

Very well, you have the right to express your opinion.  So do I.  And my opinion, expressed here, is the same that I have expressed toward other non-Whites attempting to interfere with the expression of White interests by Whites.  

Whites have their own internal debates, their own conflicts (ethnicity, sub-race, religion, etc.), their own consideration of different strategies, and their own concerns. These are OUR affairs, not yours.  These are OUR conflicts, not yours. These are OUR debates, not yours.  And these are OUR interests, not yours.

How Whites relate to each other, how Whites decide to work together (or not), how Whites decide to strategize (or not) in defense of their own interests, that is something for US to do, not you.  Ultimately, WE have to be the arbiters of OUR fate. OURSELVES ALONE.

And, no, we do not need, or want, non-Whites with their every “helpful” advice, telling us that our best option is to slow down our displacement, replacement, and destruction; that we are “dying of Whiteness;” promoting intra-White division; that we need alliances with Asians in which Whites must grovel before their Yellow and Brown masters; that we must have a multiracial “White separatist state;” that we are akin to child molesters and are “latrine flies;” that we must accept the “racial status quo;” that racial preservation for its own sake is “insane;” that we must have a “Red State nation” that accepts “conservative Blacks;” etc. 

Maybe, sir, you can take your advice to Israel, and suggest to the Jews there how they can accommodate their eventual race replacement by Arabs through an increased short-term focus on Jewish interests (hard to say how they can go beyond what they already have), or you can go to China and spread a similar message there – although, contra Frost and the “Arctic Alliance” crowd, the Chinese are hardly in any danger of race replacement.  But, wherever you go and whatever you do, we can do without your proffered chalice, dripping as it is with carefully concealed poison.

Whatever the outcome of the White racial problem, I do not believe the outcome is going to be pleasant for the likes of you. If you are wrong, and Whites quietly go to extinction without any expression of self-interest, then the resulting Colored dystopia will ultimately not be of benefit for the Coloreds themselves.

What if you are correct about the situation? That you are correct that it is untenable to suppress the expression of self-interest by a group whose demographic majority is disappearing? Let’s say I agree with you – even the White omega race may well become ever more demanding of their racial self-interest.  Where I disagree with you is with the idea that this discontent can be effectively managed through a safety valve release of controlled, moderate expression of racial self-interest. 

As Suvorov wrote – revolutions do not occur during the time of greatest repression, but when that repression is suddenly relaxed.  Louis XVI learned that, as did Gorbachev. Once the expression of White racial interests is legitimized, once the pent-up fury of a wronged people begins to be released, how can it be safely controlled? Once the genie is out of the bottle, and the toothpaste is out of the tube, can everything be safely be put away again once things begin to spiral out of control?

The future is chaos. And your stage-managed attempt at orderly White extinction will only add to that chaos. Enjoy.

Best regards,

Ted Sallis

Advice for Der Movement Part I

Important advice.

I have written about before about pathetic apostates from White nationalism, many of whom now shill for “watchdog groups,” and/or who now run their own “anti-hate” groups, and who like to promote the meme that WNs are “troubled people” with “deep personal problems” who “join the movement because they are searching for a sense of belonging” – you know the whole song and dance by now.  Of course, this description never is applied to non-White racial activists, but no matter.  These shilling apostates are typically people who used to be Type I nitwits, and who claim they become “freed from hate” once “they met a good Black person and realized that not all non-Whites were bad” – as if a ludicrously retarded idea that “all Whites good, all non-Whites bad” actually reflects the reality of authentic White racialist thought, and that the writing of a Taylor or a Johnson or a MacDonald (regardless of my own personal disagreements with those gentlemen) actually conflates with such a simpleton’s view of the racial question.

To the extent these apostates are being honest, and not mendaciously parroting System lies, it is obvious that what they are doing here is projection. Their description of the “lonely, troubled, searching White youth desperately looking for meaning” is actually a self-description.  It is THEY who joined the “movement” for all the wrong reasons, it is THEY who were the flotsam and jetsam of White society, and is THEY who were easily peeled away from racial activism because they never really believed in it to begin with.  THEY joined because of their own personal defects; THEIR “activism” and subsequent “leaving the movement” reflects on THEM, not on racial activism itself. The reality of race, the racial question, the reality of race replacement and White genocide – these realities exist independent of the psychological problems and social maladjustments of Type I retardates.

Having said all of that, there is another take on the issue. Someone recently told me about a comment made by a CEO of some company, in which the CEO basically said: “At our company the employee comes first, the customers second.  If you have happy and satisfied employees, they will do a good job and satisfy the customer; if you don’t, no amount of ‘the customer comes first’ rhetoric will do the job.”  I am also thinking of a young activist I know long ago during my own (young) analog activist days. This person, who eventually dropped out (but who insofar as I know never became an apostate; he simply dropped out), once complained to me about his fellow racial activists – “they don’t care about me as a person, they are not my friends, all they care about is the work I do for the organization.”

I do not believe this is the same person, but the general attitude is the same.

Let’s consider that complaint in the context of, first, the apostate spiel, and, second, the CEO idea. Now, the person’s complaint is not the same as the apostate meme. The person in question, based on what I observed, was a sincere activist, with a good understanding of the issues.  He did not join primarily “to belong to something.”  However, having joined, he wanted to be respected and valued as a person, and he wanted a feeling of comradeship – he wanted normal human company (something sadly lacking in the “movement”). Now, me, I’m a cold person, am not interested in “being buddies” with other racial activists, and, to be honest, the attitude behind the complaint is alien to my nature.  But I can understand it on a purely intellectual level, although I never shared those feelings. But this person’s dropping out was a real loss. He was a good activist, a fine fellow; I respected him. But as I’ve been disgusted with the “movement” – albeit for different reasons – I can understand his situation. The only thing is that this fellow made the mistake many do – they equate Der Movement with racial activism, so for them dropping out of the former means dropping out of the latter. That does not have to be so.

This gets back to the CEO’s ideas.  If you want your endeavor to be successful, first you have to take care of your employees.  Then you care for the customers.  By analogy, in racial activism, the activists are the employees, and the White masses (or at least that fraction that is reachable) are the customers.  It’s true that Der Movement treats activists shabbily – with all the feuding, warring, aberrant behavior, defectives, unpleasantness, Quota Queen Incompetence and undependability, ethnic fetishism and hostility, etc. 

So, while a “sense of belonging” should NOT be the fundamental reason for becoming an activist, there is no harm – and much gain – in creating an authentic movement that can create such a sense of belonging for activists.  You want to retain quality activists, just like a company wants to retain quality employees. While it is true that genuine racial activists, who really understand the problem of race, are not going to become anti-racist leftist apostates against racial activism, it is possible that they will drop out (while still retaining their core beliefs).  And if these dropouts are quality people, the damage will be enormous because there are so few such people to begin with; racial activism lacks a critical mass of such people and can ill afford to blithely go along its merry way, alienating such people on a constant basis (as does occur).

There has to be mechanisms for improving the activist experience. Now, of course, that is not the fundamental priority.  People need to understand that racial activism is not there for personal fulfillment.  But activists should not be gratuitously offended, alienated, disgusted, insulted, etc. – which is what often happens.  Comradeship should occur.

A good start is to eliminate some of the more egregious examples of negative and alienating behavior and outcomes; after that, one can think about adding positives.  Eliminating negatives – how about cutting back on the feuding?  The acceptance of Beavis-and-Butthead lulzing trolling?  How about making sure meetings are not so easily infiltrated?   How about not having homosexuals hitting on young men at meetings?  How about being up front about your ingroup, and then not tolerating ethnic fetishist attacks against people you accept in your group?  You know, the time to decide on whether or not someone belongs is BEFORE they join, not AFTER, not after they’ve invested months or years of work for you and your group.  The very definition of a group is the dividing line between in/out and any group that can’t even decide on something absolutely fundamental to its existence is not really any sort of viable group at all.

I’m sure the fearless leaders of the “movement” can think of many areas of improvement with respect to the issues broached in this post.  Being a real leader means being able to make good use of the human material at hand; it means valuing people who are indeed valuable. When you have something valuable you want to retain it and make good use of it, not toss it in the rubbish heap on a whim.

Really Understanding the New Zealand Mosque Massacre

Realism.

Read this.

I wish I could erect a wall between myself and the kind of unstable, undisciplined people who go on killing sprees, but you can’t change the world from a bunker.

Or from a hobbit hole.

Today’s Old Right scene is rife with fantasies of race war, lone wolf attacks on non-whites, and heroic last stands that end in a hail of police bullets. 

As opposed to the New Right that gives you a choice between going to Charlottesville dressed up like Batman or Captain America, obsessing over a cartoon frog, screaming “Kek!,” worshipping Trump, or reading Tolkien “snug in your hobbit hole.”

Intelligent and honorable people have emerged from this milieu. 

Ted Sallis?

But there have been more than a few spree-killers as well.

And more than a few frauds, grifters, and weirdos.

Moreover, killing innocent people (at a place of worship!) has entirely predictable results. First, such violence creates sympathy for the victims. (Even I feel sympathy for them…

I do not.

According to his manifesto, Tarrant actually wanted his attack to trigger the denial of First and Second Amendment rights halfway around the globe in the United States, in the hope that the resulting tensions will spark some sort of revolution. Every spree killer has the same fantasy. But the results are always the same. We lose more freedoms. But the revolution never comes. 

Actually, Tarrant is correct in that the real purpose (or one of them at least) of terrorism is to provoke the System to undertake repressive measures and thus alienate the population. Johnson is correct that this strategy simply does not work with Whites (as they currently are).  Whites are such a pathetic, weak, mewling, pansified, omega race of leucosa freaks that they’ll eagerly accept even more repression and thank the System for “stopping hate.”

Anyone who supports the further erosion of our freedom to change minds is my enemy. I don’t care what side he claims to be on.

Well, yes, after all, the “D’ Nations” may dry up, and we can’t have that!

So much for the “movement” take on this. The Left will get this all wrong by saying the incident was due to the pernicious and powerful underworld of “White supremacy.” It’s the exact opposite in fact.  It is precisely because Der Movement is so pathetically weak and useless that these things happen. Men understandably upset about their race’s demographic replacement have nowhere to turn – no real leaders, no real political parties, and no real organizations, no anything.  Racial activism is a wasteland of pontificating Quota Queens, incompetent retardates, panhandling grifters, defectives, etc. So, the easy way out is to lash out with violence. What else do they see as a possible outlet for their activist energies?  Didn’t Tarrant claim in his writings that he donated to rightist groups?  Obviously, he didn’t believe his “D’Nations” did any good, did he?

While one cannot disagree with the main points Greg Johnson makes, my riposte would be – do you think perhaps that people want real solutions and on-the-ground political organizing, and not rambling about The Age of Aluminum and reading Savitri Devi and Guenon while “snug in your hobbit hole?”  Maybe people want real leaders, and not feuding gossips who air the most atrocious dirty laundry for all the world to see.  Maybe people need hope that things can be turned around by slow, careful, prudent metapolitical and political activism.

Der Movement is to blame for this not because it is so dangerous and seductively proselyting, but for the exact opposite reason. Desperate people have nowhere to turn, abandoned by their elites and alienated from the circus freak show of “movement activism.”  So they end up becoming freaks themselves – so-called “fascists” who worship China (hello, HBD) and who have no other solution than to shoot up a mosque.

More Der Movement competence.

And again.

That’s your affirmative action “leadership.”  Then you wonder why folks snap and start doing the Rambo bit.

Thanks a bunch, “movement.”

Youth and the Left

Whither idealism?

Why are young White people (in the West, or whatever is left of it) typically leftist?  One argument is that it is youthful rebellion against parents, who are themselves typically more conservative due to the effects of family formation and increasing responsibility (and general experience with life and the realities of human nature). It is interesting that this scenario always seems to work in one direction – the children of leftist parents never seem to rebel by moving to the Right, if anything they may become even more radically leftist than their parents are.  So, it can’t be simple rebellion against parental authority.  Is it rebellion against a conservative society?  Well, today, the System is so far to the Left and so anti-White, that actual rebellion would mean that young Whites should all become neo-Nazis; “movement” fantasies about “Generation Zyklon” aside, that is not happening.  Is it because System propaganda portrays itself as exhibiting “systemic racism” and the youth perceived a Far Left System as being Far Right?  Is the rebellion against a perception rather than against a reality?

Or maybe it is not just rebellion – youth are by nature idealistic, and the Left traffics in idealism, as opposed to the stuffy, reactionary Right, which stupidly advertises itself as “standing athwart history yelling stop.”  What an inspiring image!

The reactionary Right needs to be displaced by the revolutionary Far Right and an inspiring ideology and worldview needs to be promoted.  By the way, “traditionalism” “snug in one’s hobbit hole” is not such a worldview.