Category: white nationalism

Reductio ad Absurdum

Identity and separation.

Aside from all my other criticisms of the testing companies, and the idea of using imprecise data with wide error bars for “cutoffs,” there is a more fundamental problem with the idea of any definitive defined cutoff, and one shared with phenotypic rankings such as McCulloch’s “Nordish scale.”

Any ranking cutoff – typically arbitrarily determined – that would result in “blood” members of the same monoracial family being “binned” into different polities is logically absurd and untenable and would almost certainly (and rightfully) be rejected by the population. Let’s indulge in a bit of reductio ad absurdum to illustrate the point.

Imagine a White family, an extended family wholly of European descent. Let’s make the example even starker – let us assume they are all of the same ethnic group.  But, alas, brothers Jim and Tom differ by 1% on some component of an (likely imprecise) ancestry test,  and this crosses a cutoff threshold, so Jim goes to one ethnostate and Tom to another – and these are full brothers of a monoracial and monoethnic family. The same principle applies if Jim has a “Nordish rankling” one point different from Tom. And what about the rest of the family?

Mom goes to one state, Dad to another. Siblings, parents and children, husbands and wives – all could be placed in different ethnostates based on arbitrary cutoffs on rankings derived from genetic ancestry testing or based on someone’s subjective analysis of physical appearance.

The (weak) counter-argument would be “Well, the same principle holds for racially mixed families – under any racialist plan, they would be separated, they would object, and if they wish, they can go to the outgroup ethnostate, away from us.”  

How can you compare the two sets of circumstances? They are qualitatively and quantitatively different.

On the one hand, you have Mary Sue Mudshark marrying Tyrone Carjacker; on the other hand, you have two full brothers of a monoethnic family who differ by percentage points on an ancestry test.  On the one hand, you have John Omegashire marrying a Chinatrix; on the other hand, you have someone deciding that two family members of the same ethny differ by one point on their “Nordish ranking” and so must be separated – or the “in” person has to decide to follow the “out” person and leave the ethnostate. It’s not the same thing at all. Racial identity is at the core of racialism, it is its entire meaning, and racial intermarriage abrogates that – but arbitrarily drawn cutoffs on fuzzy genetic testing or on subjective phenotypic rankings do NOT define racial identity.

You can make exceptions based on family relationships – but then that conflates to ethnic ancestry.  So, the only logical, consistent, and reasonable policy – and one that has the greatest chance of acceptance by sane people – is to “bin” people based on their ethnic ancestry and overall racial identity, and only use those other determinations for cases in which ethnic designation is unknown (e.g., adoption).

It is one thing to separate people based on their racial and ethnic identity; i.e., separating different races and ethnic groups from each other. It’s another thing entirely to separate members of the same race or even the same ethnic group from one another based on arbitrarily determined criteria. This latter situation leads to the absurdity of separating members of a monoracial or even monoethnic family from each other based on those criteria. Solving the problems inherent in the latter situation inevitably leads to the former situation – simply separating people based on determined identities based on historically established ethnic groups and the major racial groups to which those ethnic groups belong.

I imagine that some would then try to invoke a leftist argument here – “Ethnic and racial groups are also arbitrary,” but that is objectively false and goes against the entire meaning of racial activism (and ethnonationalism for those interested in that). There are historically determined ethnic groups that have a biological basis, and race can be similarly determined.  Some may argue that looking from a purely genetic and biological basis that there are some “fuzzy” boundaries for race and ethnicity.  But this is the nature of biological reality – and even non-biological reality as well (define color, define location, etc.).  But, even so, particularly at the level of continental-scale population groups (races), there is good clustering, and, even more importantly, racial and ethnic identifies have components in addition to the purely biological (although that is the most important), and all of these components together create distinctive ethnic and racial identities even if any one component in isolation is fuzzy.  Read more about all of that here.

This would seem to be common sense, but I’ve been arguing against the idea of arbitrary cutoffs that would cut across racial, ethnic (and family!) lines since the early 2000s, and it is still necessary to do so today.

Advertisements

Wednesday in Der News

In der news.

This may be the best speech Taylor has ever given (albeit it was not given directly to his intended audience). I urge readers of this blog to spread it around. Taylor has all the makings of a born politician (and I’m praising here, not being sarcastic) and should have run for office – or do so in the future. Despite my areas of disagreement with Amren, I would support such a candidacy.

By the way, if Amren concentrated more on things like this, my areas of disagreement would be minimal.  This is what we need more of, not Asian-worshipping HBD, cheap-shot attacks against White ethnics, and giving a forum to vermin like Hart.

Yes, indeed, let’s have a “hearing” on “White nationalism” in which no White nationalists are invited and, indeed, no persons of European ancestry are even invited to speak.  And we observe a Black woman representing the Right. I mean – can the clownshow of America get any more ludicrous?  And it’s another fail for Der Movement, whose decades of utter failure have led us to this junction of powerlessness, despair, and complete defeat.  Speaking of which…

Pathetic Greg Johnson response to Common Sense Counselor:

CounterCurrentsTV
2 hours ago
One of my readers asked me to reply to this. Basically, I heard someone thinking out loud about my talk and wending his way to the conclusion that no, we should not focus on education as opposed to violence. Instead, he stands for something completely different, namely educating people about just how bad things are for white people — while warning them not to do anything violent. I guess because he is assuming that, no matter how bad things are, we have time to sort them out without violence. Sorry, but I don’t see any fundamental difference between what he said and what I said. I was just a lot clearer. My strong impression is that this guy only half listened to my talk and concluded that I said some very bad things because he has an ax to grind against me. Oh well, I guess I just need to work a little harder.

Wrong (as usual) and self-serving (as usual). I see a huge fundamental difference. CSC is suggesting we be ice-cold honest about the desperate situation we are in, not assert that “yes, things seem a bit bad now, but we are going to win,” always the victory psychosis, always a refusal to face up to “movement” disasters (except when one can blame Spencer and/or Friberg), and always with the tin cup out for panhandling without any actual victories or accomplishments to show for it. CSC is also very clearly calling for action that goes beyond education but falls short of violence – whether I agree with his suggestions or not is a discussion for another day (e.g., rallies and so forth – but boycotts I do agree with), but clearly he’s calling for things apart from folks just posting web articles and selling books and begging for money. I think some folks need to “work a little harder” on their auditory comprehension skills.

It is too bad that CSC answered Johnson in the comments section in a groveling fashion, instead of doing the proper thing, which would be to answer him, directly, in writing, with the same critical force as was used in the original video.  He “doesn’t have an axe to grind” – after essentially stating that Johnson was not fit to be a WN leader.  He also implied that WN “leaders” (like Johnson) sugarcoat reality for their “business model” (rattling the tin cup and selling books).  Which is it?  Is this CSC just too polite?  Does he lack the inner conviction of his beliefs so as to effectively respond when directly challenged by those “leaders” he criticizes?

And, CSC should do a video about the psychological defects and deficiencies behind the repeated Man on White Horse Syndrome humiliations, most recently represented by the Yang Gang fiasco.

I would like to correct any misunderstandings about this post. Without seeing the paper, we cannot say anything about admixture. The paper may very well show admixture in the samples; at this point, we do not know. My point simply is that the fact of changing centroids in and of itself says nothing about admixture. The change could be from admixture, or it could be simply from addition of samples from different ethnies.  You can get gray by mixing white and black paint, or you can get gray be averaging out the colors of separate and distinct cans of white and black paint.  Changing centroids due to admixture would have to be demonstrated by showing that individual samples are admixed, simply averaging the genetics of different unmixed samples is not admixture. Again, at this point, we do not know which of these two possibilities (or a perhaps a bit of both possibilities combined) is correct.  We cannot assume one possibility or the other bases solely on the changing centroids alone.  We not only have to wait for this particular paper, but also to see whether other research groups examine the same samples or, other, similar samples,and generate similar, or different, results..  

I will also note that I have always been agnostic about what the racial provenance of ancient peoples was. I have maintained that the only way to really know is to directly assay ancient remains for their autosomal genetics (and hope those samples are representative of the relevant peoples), and this has heretofore not been done. True, I have always been skeptical about the “movement” narrative, for reasons I have written about over the years, but this has always been a cautious, prudent skepticism, and not any definitive belief. I have always thought that the “evidence” used in the debates has been absurd – “eyeballing” statues, tendentious readings of ancient texts, the work of Frank, etc. .Further, my view was and still is that we need to concentrate on the racial situation today, and in the future, not thousands of years in the past. It was people like Kemp and Pierce and their supporters who were the ones who started the whole acrimonious argument to begin with

An appetizer for the upcoming Roman study:

Results suggest that only 7% of individuals buried at Vagnari were born elsewhere and migrated to Vagnari, while the remaining individuals were either local to Vagnari (58%), or from the southern Italian peninsula (34%). Our results are consistent with the suggestion that Roman Imperial lower‐class populations in southern Italy sustained their numbers through local reproduction measures, and not through large‐scale immigration from outside the Italian peninsula.

Kemp weeps.

Want to read something that shows you where feminist man-hating is heading?  Read Jack Vance’s City of the Chasch in Planet of Adventure, in particular the section on “The Seminary of the Female Mystery.”  Vance being prescient once again – better than the idiot Tolkien and his juvenile fantasies about “orcs.”  By the way, the good guys win in the Vance story, as the men revolt and destroy the Seminary and kill the Priestesses.  Unfortunately, the catalyst for that was a bit of White Knighting, but you can’t have everything.

Roissy:

Trump recently fired Scandicuck DHS secretary Kirstjen Nielsen, because the border had become a slip n’ slide for hundreds of thousands of Central Americans under her watch. Even the enemy media noticed and had to act as if they didn’t report just a few weeks ago that there wasn’t a national emergency at the border.
Trump also did a 180 on legal immigration, recently stating that America “was full” and didn’t need more immigrants, contradicting the enthusiasm for legal immigration he displayed in his SOTU address.
Word has it Stephen Miller (PBU that most righteous and based of specials) is taking over all immigration related policy matters in Trump’s administration.
What gives? Is this more hot air from Trump? Did he get a fright from internal polling? Is he an amnesiac? Is he too lazy to remember his policy proposals from one week to the next and just wants to ride a wave of feelz on whatever banal thought enters his mind? Did Ivanka go on vacation? Did Jared? Did the maturing Barron give his dad a suddenly judgmental gaze and a warning about his legacy? Did Melania finally stop crying over separated beanlets and show Donald the sharp edge of her Outer Hajnal soul?
Did Trump catch an earful from…us? Does vanity preclude me from wondering if dissidents to the prevailing orthodoxy, threatening to abandon Trump for his MAGA betrayals, pulled President Trump back to the essence of Campaign Trump?

No, Roissy, no. It’s like this – Trump is a lazy, stupid, imbecilic, vulgar buffoon, who, literally, believes and promotes whatever was the latest idea whispered in his ear. Before the State of the Union, Jew Kushner and converted Jew Ivanka were doing the whispering, more recently, Jew Miller has been whispering.  Obviously, one has to be either an ethnic Jew, or a converted Jew family member, to be allowed near Trump’s hairy orange ear.  Weasel-faced goys like you (or mick Bannon) are not allowed.

And as regard the moronic HBD Cunt Hajnal crap turds like you continue to peddle, you can only hope that you had an “Outer Hajnal” ethnocentric White as US President, instead of the retarded bloated fat cuck shitheel currently occupying the White House.

Let’s not be too hard on the Swedes.  They wuz Romans, after all.  No, wait…

In Der News

More odds and ends.

Absolutely, atrociously disgusting.  The problem is that the Quota Queens not only discredit and embarrass themselves.  Their pathetically humiliating and moronic stupidity smears all WNs by unfortunate association in the public mind.

Now let us all sit back and watch this latest Man on White Horse Syndrome debacle unfold…for the umpteenth time.

Once again, EGI Notes will be a bastion of sanity among a sea of “movement” madness. Just as this site rode the waves of the Trump hysteria, and coasted with a bemused eye through the Alt Right fever, so shall we all get though the Yang Gang Bang.

Understanding the human history of Amren 2006.

On the one hand, this is generally interesting and informative (but reflecting the author’s own biases).  But – he talks about himself?  And in a serious, non-ironic manner?*  Anyway, I’ve written about this Liddell before – just another typical “movement” ethnic fetishist.  And – who knows? – maybe “living in Japan” should be reserved for individuals of Japanese ethnicity? That would affirmatively be the “Right” thing to do, eh?

Indeed, perhaps Liddell should leave the great and good Japanese people alone to develop according to their own inner imperative.  For example, look here for an example of how the people of Nagasaki recovered from the atomic bombing to develop a scientific, architectural, and cultural artifact that the West can only dream of matching. Western Man stands in humble awe at that Oriental magnificence.

Have you ever noticed that so many of these ethnonationalist, ethnic fetishist, Alt Right, Alt Lite, and national conservative types like living in other people’s countries?  One fellow lives in Japan.  Another in Georgia.  Two in in Hungary.  One in Romania and another in Italy. None of these are of the ethnic origins indigenous to the nations in which they live, but they are all ethnonationalists, you see. The ones who live in Romania and Italy critique the nations in which they live and then take native women as their wives.  Incredible.  This is not ethnonationalism. It is ethnoimperialism.  All these racial aristocrats will live where they damn please, you see, and do whatever they want, after all, what are the dumb wogs going to do about it? 

Hey!  According to the great and good Desmond Jones, the White race is a “twentieth century Jewish construct.”

During the debates, congressmen sometimes used the word “European” rather than “white,” but it is clear that there was unanimity on this point: the United States was to be exclusively for white people.

So, late 18th century America: European = White.  The fetishists shown to be fundamentally dishonest, once again.

The metamorphosis into a neocon shill is approaching completion.

All of this material to work with, all of this White dissatisfaction, angst, and fear for the future, and all the Quota Queens can give us is “let’s support Chinaman Yang’s efforts to defuse White anger.”  They’re pathetic.

Roissy and Mangan weep bitter low-carb tears.

So much winning!  Black Nationalism of course will still be allowed, as per the original article.  Note that the decision was made in consultation with anti-White “experts” with White nationalists not being allowed to explain their position.

Anyone who argues that White Nationalism and White Separatism are the same as “White Supremacy” is so fundamentally dishonest they should be considered as peddling the equivalence of sociopolitical malpractice.  And by censoring political expression – and only from the pro-White side – they are virtually guaranteeing that more violence will occur. That’s the ultimate objective I suppose, so it can be used to justify more repression.

An informational note to regular readers: the site is on both Blogspot and WordPress, in case you have a preference for a format, or a problem with one of the sites:

*Obviously my own references to the crazy and bitter no good Ted Sallis are sarcastic and ironic.

Odds and Ends

Observations.

On the one hand, White nationalists are routinely mocked as follows – “They’re a bunch of losers who identify with White historical accomplishments because they have no personal accomplishments of their own.” On the other hand, we as a nation enthusiastically celebrate “Black History Month,” and smile benignly as some inarticulate Negro takes pride in the fact that Tyrone Carjacker invented a new brand of malt liquor. Inconsistent much?

Dostoevsky certainly was familiar with Jews and Jewish phenotypes.  We find the following in his classic Crime and Punishment:

His face wore that perpetual look of peevish dejection, which is sourly printed on all faces of Jewish race without exception.

I’m sure everyone knows the look to which he refers – consider Anthony Weiner or Ruth Bader Ginsburg as examples. Or one can envision the great Professor Hart cursing at David Duke as another example of the phenotypic trend in question.

Behold the female: The Inventor!

Holmes, now 35, and Theranos’s former chief operating officer, Ramesh “Sunny” Balwani, have a pending criminal fraud case against them in a federal court in San Jose, the heart of Silicon Valley. If prosecutors have their way, the two may go to prison over charges that they defrauded investors, doctors, and patients.

Agency, agency!  Remember – we got to get girls interested in STEM careers!  Who knows what we are missing out on!  And we need more South Asian cognitive elitists as well!

I admit to feeling some degree of schadenfreude over the collapse of Theranos.  Even some rightist, anti-feminist women I know were getting all excited over Holmes, and now I get to rub their faces in it.  Petty and malicious? Well, after all, “movement leaders” have called me “crazy and bitter,” so it all fits.

Of course, “there is no such thing as race;” and “we are all biologically, genetically the same,” and yet we need “diversity” in genetics studies because…genetic differences in human populations (that just happen to track most closely with race).  But don’t you get any nasty ideas that you can explain health disparities by these differences, no sir, it’s all due to dat dere “racism.”

Couple thoughts on Spencer
1. Who else called Trump better?

Answer: Ted Sallis. When Spencer was yelling “Hail Trump!,” I was writing (for months by that time) that Trump was a fraud, a buffoon, a race cuck, a huckster.  The new revisionist history – “Spencer was right about Trump all along.”  No, he wasn’t.

As bad as Pierce was, he was still a whole lot better than the “leaders” we have today.  Pierce – who had a physics PhD and briefly worked in academia and in industry before becoming a full-time activist – at least had some degree of intellectual heft and gravitas.  What we have today is nothing more than a bad joke.

Speaking of jokes, while I identify more with Rorschach in The Watchmen, I can’t disagree with The Comedian – “It’s all a joke.” Indeed it is.  Can anyone take our current society seriously?  The pathetic, mewling, weak White race seriously?  Der Movement seriously?

Terrorism and the Mendacity of the Left

They promote terrorism by excluding ideological opponents from participation in the political process.

Amren, 3/18/19.  That you saw before at Sallis, 3/16/19.

The best way to prevent terrorism is to allow dissidents to fairly participate in the political process, politics being broadly defined to include all activity related to power and influence and their acquisition. Conversely, the best way to promote terrorism is to exclude people from the political arena, leaving them no alternative than to engage in violence.

The Left has systematically excluded the Far Right from access to the political process. Let’s consider White Nationalists. These people are deplatformed, censored, their leaders physically attacked with impunity, meetings shut down, speeches prevented, and rallies attacked, and in some countries merely expressing these ideas are illegal (what some want in America as well).  In Australia, a Senator, an elected official, was physically assaulted in an act of political violence (*), and the Prime Minister of that nation supports the assault, praises the attacker, and wants the victim legally persecuted because he struck back in self-defense – all for the crime of being a “nationalist.”

In general, this repression preceded the acts of terror being used to justify the repression and to justify further repression. Things similar to the Australian “egging” have always occurred on a regular basis before New Zealand – always attacks by the Left against the Right.

The Left claims that White nationalism needs to be suppressed because random acts of terrorism have occurred; the reality is that those acts of terrorism have occurred precisely because White nationalism has been suppressed.  Cause and effect are reversed as a part of typical leftist gaslighting.

Also note that leftist terrorism is never invoked as a rationale to ban Far Left political parties or to legally persecute leftists. Islamic terrorism is met with calls for “more understanding” and “more integration” – no one is banned or deplatformed. Islamic parties exist in Europe. Despite terrorist attacks in Europe, those parties are not banned. No Antifa show up at rallies or meetings of those parties. And Antifa itself is not persecuted; curiously enough, the government of the allegedly “racist fascist” Trump coddles Antifa and legally persecutes Antifa’s victims. Antifa itself celebrates Marxist mass murderers and terrorists. Indeed, despite being characterized by political violence and terrorism in the 1960s and 70s (never mind the horrors of communism), the Left is now dominant in the Establishment of what used to the West.

On a more fundamental racial level in the USA, acts of violence by BLM supporters have not resulted in targeting of that movement by the System; instead, BLM gets support. The Zebra murders did not result in the banning of Black Muslims; no one dares deplatform or censor them, and the idea of their rallies being broken up by Antifa is comically ludicrous, as is the idea that some soyboy would dare ”egg” any Black nationalist leader.

It only White nationalism that is held responsible for rare acts of lone wolf violence, and that is because White nationalism was already repressed before the violence – the violence, which is a result of the repression, is used to not only retroactively justify the past repression but to proactively justify even more repression.

Let’s put it this way: What came first – Richard Spencer having to cancel his college speaking tour or the New Zealand attack?  What came first – deplatforming and censorship or the New Zealand attack?  What came first – an endless series of cancelled Amren and VDARE meetings, or the New Zealand attack?  Shall I continue?

That is why political violence and terrorism by the Left and/or Coloreds is never met with banning, deplatforming, censorship, denunciations by the US Congress, hysteria by the Australian Prime Minster, any of it.  It’s not the rare acts of violence by isolated Nutzi types that really bothers these people.  That’s just an excuse; again, it’s a rationale to justify their pre-existing hostility toward the ideology of White nationalism and the people who believe in it. On a deeper level, it is a rationale to justify their pre-existing hatred of White people and the desire to see Whites demographically and cultural replaced.

*”He was only ‘egged’ so it is no big deal,” the Left says.  Really?  What do they think would happen if they tried to “egg” a US President?  One could imagine the screaming if an Alt Righter “egged” Her Majesty AOC. Forget about people – imaging the anguished screaming if a Nutzi “egged” the statue of Saint Martin of King.  Look, it doesn’t matter if you believe that “it is not a big deal.” The attack on Anning was a physical assault in the service of political ideology; hence, it can be termed terrorism.  

Also see this.

Who Will Say The Emperor Has No Clothes?

A lose-lose proposition.

This brings us to the fundamental White Nationalist objection to colorblind civic nationalism. Fukuyama wants all Americans to stop engaging in factional identity politics and instead identify with the whole of America, defined in maximally inclusive liberal democratic terms. But American civic nationalism is not a workable political ideology, because it will only be adopted by whites. Non-whites will continue openly or covertly to practice identity politics, because it benefits them.

Team strategies consistently outperform individualist strategies. Thus if whites practice color-blind individualism while non-whites practice racial and ethnic collectivism, whites will steadily lose wealth and power to non-whites. Thus, in practice, color-blind civic nationalism is simply a mechanism of white dispossession—a mechanism that blinds whites to what is happening and teaches them that blindness is a moral virtue. If you preach blindness as a moral virtue, chances are you are up to no good.

That’s a fine analysis – albeit certainly not anything novel – and the whole essay illustrates that Johnson can be useful if he focuses on his strengths, such as making arguments in favor of White nationalism, and not waste time and energy feuding with Richard Spencer, obsessing in Luddite fashion over “traditionalism,” or taking the easy way out and hooking up with the Alt Wrong.

But, the key negative point of the essay, where it goes wrong and descends into typical Der Movement drivel, is with this:

…does anyone really believe that white Americans would not start resisting their dispossession once the end game became clear?

Yes, I will really believe it – until the time White Americans prove otherwise (and, no, voting for a vulgar obese clown does not constitute “resistance”).  The “movement” always likes to make assumptions, always goes in the direction of cowardly optimism (a la Spengler), always refuses to look hard facts in the face, always wants to avoid painful yet inevitable reckonings.

Let us consider the current Steve King fiasco to better understand the state of Der Movement and of the potential of “White American resistance” in the USA.  There are four essential points, in descending order of importance:

1. Steve King is being attacked, humiliated, discredited, denounced, threatened by his own party, socially priced, targeted by the entire media especially and including “conservatives,” undermined, with the specter of career-damaging “punishment” (again, mostly from his own party) – all for the alleged crime of being some sort of “White nationalist.”  No one comes to his defense (just like James Watson, a similar public morality play, eh?) – King is alone, isolated, with the spotlight of public scorn, a political auto-da-fe – all for the “crime think” of supposedly holding ideas similar to WNs.  Perhaps the Amren Jews were not wrong when they said that WNs are considered worse than child molesters.

Now, all of this would be bad enough if King really was a White nationalist, and if he, at least, held his head up high and defended the ideals that all of us believe.  That would be bad enough, but at least he would be seen as a fighter, at least he’d be fighting for our side.  BUT…

2. At the same time King is being raked over the coals for being a White nationalist, he is vocally, publicly, and vehemently denouncing White nationalism, stating it is something disgusting, un-American, something to be abhorred and rejected. Do you see how this is all a lose-lose proposition for Der Movement?

On the one hand, some milquetoast civic nationalist is being publicly humiliated because of the mistaken idea he holds WN beliefs – thus associating in the public eye WN beliefs with defeat, degradation, and humiliation.  Then, on the other hand, the civic nationalist being punished for “being a WN” is himself viciously attacking White nationalism.  Thus, the real target here, the real loser, the real “tarred and feathered” humiliated outcast is the creed of White nationalism itself, denounced and spat upon by everyone, including by a politician being “punished” for his alleged (and false) adherence to the same creed he denounces.  ALSO…

3. Real racialists and supremacists – Colored racial nationalists like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez – get to score public points by denouncing “White supremacist congressmen” – gaslighting us all since the “White supremacist” is busy denouncing White nationalism and we live in a nation in which Whites are not allowed to defend their own interests, but Puerto Rican anti-White racists are so allowed.  FINALLY…

4. All this is happening under the “watch” of the “White supremacist” President The God Emperor, who has done nothing for Whites but throw them under the bus for the last two years.  Complete demoralization, complete defeat, complete despair and hopelessness.

So…do you really believe White Americans will rise up in resistance?  And where are their leaders?

All these guys arguing over WHEN the victory will take place are pathologically delusional.

Fact is that Whites have proven time and again that they can take abuse unlimited without doing a damn thing about it.

Even more – the “movement” is an UTTER FAILURE – after decades of “movement activism” and with all the victory psychosis, the Steve King fiasco described above shows us how pathetic, powerless, and pitiful the American “movement” really is.

Hey, do you want thumos in the sense that the Ancient Greeks used it?  

What we NEED is this some prominent “movement” leader – enraged by the constant failure and disgusted by his own contributions to this failure – to generate some real thumos, say to hell with “D’Nations” and the hell with ego and the hell with delusions of grandeur and the hell with petty “movement” politics – and stand up like a MAN and publicly state that The Emperor Has No Clothes – the “movement “is a failure, he has been wrong all these years and has to be held accountable along with all the other failed leaders, that the dogma is a failure, Der Movement is a failure, it has failed the race, it is all no good, and we need a completely fresh start.

Such a man, such a statement, would take real courage, would reflect real courage and character – I could respect and support such a person.

Which leader is willing to be a REAL LEADER and finally admit the bitter truth? 

Who will say The Emperor Has No Clothes?

Racial Kinism vs. Racial Instrumentalism

Two competing visions of racialism: WN vs. HBD.

There are many distinctions within racial activism.  One fundamental difference is that between White nationalists proper and so-called HBD race realists.  Of course, there is overlap between these positions to a greater or lesser degree.  However, let us consider the question of where a person’s primary interests lie.  Does a person take the view that race is of interest because they wish to preserve and promote their race for the reason that it is theirs – a kinship-EGI-based approach, or is their interest in race instrumental and utilitarian – they view population groups on the basis of some phenotypic characteristics of these groups, characteristics independent of whether or not the group is one to which the person belongs.  The former position, which I term here “Racial Kinism,” is more relevant to basic White nationalism (or any racial nationalism), while the latter position is that taken by HBD race realists.

Let us back up a minute and clarify.  HBD race realism is often pursued for reasons other than those stated by the HBDers.  For example, Jewish and Asian HBDers are for the most part really Race Kinists – racial nationalists – who support HBD as a way of promoting their own racial interests. In this case, they are Racial Kinists pretending to be Racial Instrumentalists in order to manipulate White HBDers to behave in ways congenial to Jewish and Asian interests. Thus, HBD is an approach for Jews and Asians to have White HBDers as the extended phenotypes of Jews and Asians. Some White HBDers have personal reasons for promoting HBD – consider Derbyshire and his Chinese wife and half-Chinese children.  So, familial and sexual interests play a role.  Academic HBDers promote their careers, and so forth. [And we have the White Silkers and their sexual motivations – but that’s another story].

But what about, speaking generally here, White HBDers without any obvious personal agenda?  How do we compare their viewpoints to that of White nationalists?  How do we compare Kinism vs. Instrumentalism regarding race?

Racial Kinism:  This group supports racial preservationism for its own sake. This is the basic White nationalist position – if you are White, then the White race is your race, and one you should support and promote, akin to family writ large.  Certainly, such a person may value particular characteristics of Whites, and may use such arguments, but that is not the primary motivation.  This agenda is consistent with Salter’s concept of EGI – ethnic genetic interests – a kinship-based approach where one’s ethny is a large storehouse of genetic interest for them, and inclusive fitness approaches to promote the interests of one’s ethny is consistent with biologically adaptive behavior. The Racial Kinist approach therefore values as the ultimate focus of interest biological/genetic relatedness (kinship). One supports one’s race because it is their race.  Such individuals realize that it is maladaptive to sacrifice the interests of your group for that of another group, just because that other group may rank higher on some phenotypic trait that someone values (proximate interest).  The ultimate interest of genetic continuity and EGI trump any proximate concern.  Again, this does not mean that proximate concerns are unimportant, merely secondary.

Racial Instrumentalism:  This group views race primarily in an instrumental and purely utilitarian fashion.  An ethny is valued because of how they rank in a hierarchy of certain phenotypic traits.  Arguments in favor of one’s ethny revolve around some perceived (or objective) value they have based on certain characteristics that are independent of the genetic kinship the ethny has to the person making the evaluation of the phenotypes.  While such a person may profess some value in kinship, this is a relatively weak factor; they are primarily concerned with “form and function,” and if another ethny ranks higher in the desired traits than one’s own, then that genetically alien ethny will be valued to an equal degree.  Racial Instrumentalism – caring about population groups primarily based on perception of traits, ability, and performance – leaves the instrumentalist vulnerable to extreme maladaptive behavior, as they can invest in a genetically distant group rather than in their own.  It is Whites who are particularly vulnerable – as they are generally more individualistic, lower on ethnocentrism, more universalist, more “objective” and “rational” when it comes to evaluating groups, and therefore more prone to “judge individuals rather than groups” and thus willing to accept membership in a racial categories (e.g., cognitive elitism) based on traits rather than on kinship.  Other groups, more ethnocentric and subjective in their ethnic self-interest, can manipulate this aracial universalism of Whites by promoting to those Whites the “legitimacy” of these aracial categories in which the ethnocentric non-Whites are valued for their ranking on traits.  Thus, a White HBDer, being a Racial Instrumentalist, rejects Blacks only because Blacks are perceived as stupid, violent, uncreative, sociopathic, and useless, not because of the gulf of kinship, the raw racial difference; conversely, Jews and Asians are valued as “high-IQ cognitive elitists.”  Whites can be manipulated into non-reciprocated “alliances” with these groups.  Also, note how White HBDers are manipulated into rejecting so-called “Outer Hajnal” Europeans while at the same time embracing genetically alien Jews and Asians who are even more “Outer Hajnal” than any of the European groups in question.  Interestingly, a trait ranking that is a problem when associated with fellow Europeans mysteriously disappears as an issue of concern when Jews and Asians are considered.  If none of this makes sense, well, it is really not supposed to.  The HBD cult is, in the last analysis, a strategy for making Whites into the extended phenotypes of Jews and Asians.

It’s interesting that many WN 1.0 Kinists refuse to critique HBD instrumentalism.  Is that because of personal connections – the good old boys network?  Is it because they foolishly think they can use instrumentalism in an instrumental fashion, to promote kinism (the means defeating the ends, I think)? Is it because the Instrumentalists appeal the ethnic and subracial vanity of the WN 1.0ers – you guys are better than the swarthoids and hunkies? Or is it plain cowardice, naiveté, or both?

Indeed, many Kinists are heavily into Instrumentalism.  Nothing wrong with using some degree of Racial Instrumentalism as a “side-argument,” but not as the main issue. Alluded to above, I believe that certain Kinists have been (intentionally) “seduced” by the HBDers, appealing to the Kinists’ vanity and the narcissism of minor differences, favorably comparing the good “Inner Hajnal” (and higher-IQ) superior Whites to the bad “Outer Hajnal” (and lower-IQ) inferior Whites.  Thus, these Kinists are made to feel part of a (cognitive elitist and behavior elitist) “elect” – which serves the HBD purpose of dividing Whites against each other.  Note that Jews have been said to promote alien immigration into America so as to disrupt the White majority, to disrupt the homogeneity and organic solidarity of White America – because Jews feel more safe and comfortable as one minority among many in a diverse America, and not as an identifiable minority singled out in a more homogeneous majority White America.  Similarly, HBDers fear and oppose (pan-European) White solidarity that would exclude Jews and Asians, and thus they do everything possible to disrupt the organic solidarity of the European peoples, turning different types of Whites against each other, to build a Jeurasian ingroup based on a HBD-promoted ranking of traits that would have Jews and Asians on top. And the Type I Kinists fall for it time and again, because their egos and ethnosubracial vanity trumps prudence and common sense.

What about the argument that HBDers are in “pursuit of the truth?’’ Long time readers of this blog, familiar with my exposés of HBD, know this is a lie, and know that the HBDers lie, distort, cherry pick, and omit to pursue their political agenda.  Is “pursuit of the truth” why certain “race realists” refuse to discuss population genetics findings – even those generated by Jewish researchers! – that show Jews as a genetically distinct entity, different from Europeans?  Why did the HBDers get all hysterical over the Schettino case, but studiously ignore a similar incident involving Koreans?

No, HBD, ultimately is a political movement; it is not science.  Real racial science is based on falsifiable hypotheses and hypothesis-testing, it is based on facts and skepticism, hard data, proper methodology, and a willingness to re-think ideas if the data do not fit.  HBD starts with the desired conclusion and then creates ad hoc hypotheses, combined with cherry picked data, and hand-waving spin to explain when, inevitably, the data do not support the hypotheses.  When was the last time an HBDer admitted they were wring about something fundamental?  It is politics, not science, with the politics serving Jewish and Asian interests and White HBDers seduced into supporting the political interests of alien racial groups.  That Jews have been supporting HBD is without question. They’ve supported it financially and,of course, people like Hart and Levin have been leading HBDers, saying nothing of Sailer who in the past made vague claims of at least part Jewish ancestry for his biological parents.

Although Racial Kinist WNs and Racal Instrumentalist HBDers can sometimes cooperate on certain narrow projects, the bottom line is that the two viewpoints are fundamentally incompatible when one considers primary value systems.

This is all a concern as the HBD Alt Wrong attempts to seize control of Der Movement, and many WNs refuse to oppose this, or in some cases, commit Race Treason and facilitate it.  And if so-called “anti-Semitic” WN 1.0ers continue to fail to speak out against the At Wrong, I will call them out about it.  HBD is NOT racial science, it is a perversion of it.  What are you waiting for?

Note:

Kinism apparently exists in Christianity as well.  I would guess Jews and Asians are not preferred there either.