Category: White vote

Rotten Orange News, 5/11/17

More on the Neocon cuck Donald J. Trump.

Of course White supporters are fleeing.  They thought they were voting for someone who would represent their interests, and instead got someone representing Jewish-Chinese-“dreamer” interests. Cuckadoodledoo!

Next he’ll propose to deliver nuclear weapons using a trebuchet.

And, yes, he invented the saying “a chicken in every pot” as well.

Advertisements

Suffer the Little Children

Whites take abuse unlimited.

Read this.

The 2014 outbreak of AFM occurred at the same time as a far larger outbreak of enterovirus D68 across the United States. The vast majority of patients infected with the virus developed only a respiratory illness. Some physicians were convinced that EV-D68 was the cause, not only because both outbreaks occurred at the same time but also because of a study that identified a particular strain of EV-D68 in the airways of children with AFM.


It is very plausible that this virus entered the USA via immigration, including from “unaccompanied Central American children” as well as our usual flood from Mexico and assorted other flotsam and jetsam.
Why do Whites tolerate this? Even if there is only a remote possibility this is from immigration that should be sufficient to stir outrage and reaction in any sane and healthy people. I’m not saying Whites need to riot and rampage in an orgy of bloody destruction – which is what EVERY other people would do if subjected to a fraction of what Whites endure – but what about politics? Even a Negro-loving ultra race cuck like Trump, who is at least a mild immigration restrictionist, cannot get a large majority of the White vote.
Whites are maladaptively unfit; they are not only inferior, but subhumanly inferior.


Basket of Bunkers

The Left’s misunderstanding (or deception).

Hillary’s supporters are doubling down on her “basket of deplorables” comment; indeed, they tell us that she underestimated the proportion of Trump’s supporters who are irredeemable bigots.  Thus, the current narrative of the Left is that a very significant portion of the White American electorate is composed of hardcore racists akin to the most extreme of the Alt-Right – many millions of White racial nationalists.

However, the reality is that White racial nationalism in America is tiny and powerless, often persecuted, sans resources and supporters.  Indeed, many racial nationalists – myself included – have asserted that only if a fraction – even 10% – of White Americans supported our views then we would be on the road to victory, given a bedrock of support; history is always made by a dedicated minority. But that minority must have some numbers, two dozen guys measuring each other’s cephalic indices with calipers in the basement of a meeting hall just won’t cut it.  Obviously, this minority does not currently exist.

So, why this discrepancy between breathless Leftist accounts of numberless hordes of virulent White racists, and the grim reality of a powerless “movement?”

The Left, to the extent they believe their own rhetoric, are captive to their Manichean mindset; they view race through a binary prism: if you are not a racial progressive, then you are a Hitler-loving Nutzi.  This is absurd and unrealistic, as racial attitudes exist along a continuum, and the bulk of even the most hardcore Trump supporters are more liberal about race than are most Alt-Righters, never mind other types of racial nationalists.

Trump’s supporters, and here I am talking about those the Left labels as “deplorables,” are at best “Archie Bunker types” – causal bigots whose mild racism is almost always a private affair and never manifests as public behavior or, more importantly, into the political realm. These are civic nationalist types who don’t like Blacks (who does – other than Trump, the cucks, and the Left?) and who have nostalgia about an America that is long gone.  In the past they have cheerfully voted for the most outrageous of anti-White liberal Republican cucks.  But after many years of disappointments and frustrations, they feel like Trump’s politically incorrect speech gives them a voice (however muted and cucked it may be). These people are hardly racial nationalists, not in any way supporters of Der Movement, and are for the most part completely useless – for now – for racial nationalism.

They do, however, constitute a possible source of recruits (at least those who don’t already have one foot in the grave – remember, Trump’s supporters are all “old grouchy White men”).

However, before Der Movement can go recruiting among the Bunkers, it must get its own house in order.  Who in their right mind would want to be recruited to a deranged embarrassment like Der Movement? [Note: I’m obviously not in my right mind, to have been so recruited in the past.  After all, haven’t my critics labeled me as insane?].  I have to laugh at those activists who dream of a “Day of the Rope,” a “reckoning” for all who have harmed the White race.  How about looking at yourselves?  If there ever is a settling of accounts by a real racial nationalist revolution, all the Nutzis and their leaders (including, perhaps, some “Alt-Right” heroes) had better wonder what end of the rope they’ll end up at.

Of course, a dedicated pacifist and effete liberal such as myself does not like to think about such distasteful topics.

In any case, “movement” stupidity and failure aside, the inability of the Left to understand the concept of degree leads them to hysterical errors in which all is black vs. white (no pun intended).  And then they accuse us of simplicity – of not being able to see all the shades of gray!  Fifty shades, no doubt, to the leftist eye, if they would only look.

Free 2016 Debating Advice for Donald Trump

Pay attention, “God Emperor.”

Don’t flip flop.  Backpedaling makes you look weak and indecisive; keep in mind your popularity is due to plain speaking on important issues.  Now, of course, you can polish your delivery of the material, sound more presidential and knowledgeable, but that is presentation.  The actual content, the fundamentals, should not be compromised.  You need to learn how to use political ju–jitsu to turn the tables on her arguments, so as to continue to appeal to your base while also not turning off all of the cucks.  As an example: the charge that you are being cruel to immigrants and refugees who want a better life – deporting families, breaking up families.  Here, you should take a page from Edward Ross and argue that open borders are cruel to Americans and their posterity, that the Democrats are more interested in the rights and interests of immigrants, particularly illegals, than they are of American citizens (lay on that civic nationalism real thick, appeal to the cucks).  Paraphrase Ross, in that future generations of Americans beseech us with their interests, needs, and desires just as much as do the migrant hordes.  Also, that we can’t take in all who want to come – open borders will destroy us without really helping the overcrowded others, whose problems can only be solved in their own nations.  You’ll need to know the facts though (see below), to answer the lies about how Immigration “benefits” natives. You should also be prepared to not only answer the usual economic arguments, but to state, clearly and forthrightly, that there are issues at stake here that go beyond economics, dollars and cents – the posterity of American citizens, their rights to their own country, their culture and their identity (“identity” is as close as you can get to race, unfortunately).

A devastating riposte to all the talk about “compassion” is to openly ask your opponent: “Why do you seem to care more about illegal aliens and potential terrorists than you do about actual American citizens?”  You can point out that charity begins at home, and that there are plenty of problems right here in America that require our attention, without importing other people’s problems from overseas. If you really want to win over the cucks and women, ask about Jamiel Shaw: “Why does Hillary care more about illegal gangbangers than she does about African-American student athletes?”  (The cucks and “college-educated women” will eat that right up, I’ll tell you that for nothing).  Note to Trump: More commercials featuring Jamiel Shaw Sr. – that’ll get those cuck loins stirring.

And don’t be apologetic about foreign policy, including Putin and Russia. Russia is an important nation, a nuclear-armed nation, and Putin is a powerful and popular leader.  It is in the interests of the American people that we have reasonably good relations with Russia. You can point out that we had a chance for a cooperative relationship with Russia after the end of the Cold War, and that was ruined by the Neocons (whose foreign policy Hillary supports) and their pathological hatred of the Russian nation.

In summary, do not backtrack.  Forcefully state that you represent the American people, the people out there watching the debate, not the special interests and outsiders supporting Clinton in her contempt toward, and hostility against, Middle America.

Don’t be too abusive.  Unfortunately, you cannot be too abusive to Hillary, and I say unfortunately because I would really like to see you subject her to a withering attack of abuse and humiliation. However, that will alienate all the white-knighting moderate GOP cucks, and turn off the “college-educated women” and other flotsam and jetsam whose votes you need.  Be relentless, but not abusive.

Push her hard.  Hillary Clinton is a sick “woman” – sick both physically and mentally.  While I have no doubt she will be well propped up medically – perhaps through the use of drug stimulants – that can only go so far, and medical interventions for someone as sick as she comes with its own set of debilitating side effects. You, Donald, are by far the healthier, more energetic, more robust of the two of you.  You need to push, challenge, keep up a fast pace (to the extent possible within the debate format), stress her (without being overtly abusive as noted above).  If she has suspect stamina and depleted natural energy, do all you can to exhaust, frustrate, and tire her. The details can be worked out with your campaign staff, who know more about the details of the debate format than I.  But, details aide, the objective is clear: your opponent is not well and you must, if possible, push her past her limits of endurance and of patience. Imagine if she collapses on stage. Or merely looks exhausted, even with artificial aids.  Or looks confused, or needs “bathroom breaks,” or loses her cool in a moment of heated debate. The possibilities to make her look bad by leveraging her bad heath and nasty temperament are all there for you to take full advantage of.

Know your material.  As part of preparation, you need to know facts, you need to have plans behind your proposals.  You can’t answer questions about the nuclear triad with “the devastation is very important to me” (while I find that amusing, your typical BMI-enriched soccer mom will think you’re a lunatic) and you can’t keep on bloviating about “a big beautiful wall” that “Mexico will pay for.”  And you need to get things straight about deportation. Why not dust off self-deportation?  It’s a reasonable plan.  Let’s be honest: you have a pretty low threshold to reach here – the impression is that you are an ignorant buffoon.  If you can at least give the impression of being reasonably well-informed, it’ll shock – in a positive sense – the audience. Expectations are low here, so you can easily exceed them with some work.

Don’t be baited. Did you learn your lesson from the Brown Star Family fiasco?  Democrats in general, and Hillary and crew in particular, despise the military; therefore, the only reason for the brownsters was to bait you into making a hostile response, so as to alienate all the GOP cuckservatives and chicken hawks who worship the military (just as long as it’s someone else providing the service and the sacrifices). You fell for it. Don’t let it happen again.

The whole racism and Alt-Right issue will come up. most likely. Don’t be baited, and do NOT throw your own supporters under the bus.  Turn it around and make the issue one of the “basket of deplorables” comment with which “Hillary has smeared millions of hard-working American citizens” (of all races! – cuckadoodledoo!), she is “spewing hate” (use the Left’s own language against them), all “right-thinking people” will reject “her message of division and hate.”  Stress how your own policies are moderate and reasonable, and that you cannot control who supports you, but that you are not going to denounce concerned Americans who want what is best for their country, even if “some may not always express themselves as eloquently as one would hope.”

If Duke is mentioned?  You can state truthfully that you have disavowed him – and you can ask Hillary when she will disavow some of her own questionable supporters (get names from your campaign staff – there should be no shortage there).  

Why do these “radical” people support you?  Look, the American people have been ignored by the elites so long that folks get frustrated and some “may go too far,” but the mass of your supporters are decent, hard-working, law-abiding American citizens (like Jamiel Shaw Sr. – cue the cuck heavy breathing) who should not be smeared by Hillary’s spewing hate. If she is so stupid as to mention Pepe, or anything similar?  Shake your head sadly and mock her for wasting time with something so silly.  Then counter-punch and cite her own inflammatory remarks and questionable supporters. You get the picture.

Prepare!  For godssakes, don’t be a jackass and think you can “wing it” without ample preparation. Sure, you don’t want to appear robotic or over-rehearsed, but you nevertheless need to be as prepared for this as for anything you’ve ever done before.  Practice debates with someone standing in for Hillary are essential, and your mock opponent should be instructed to try to rile you, bait you, and anger you.  You must be immune to provocations, and be ready for a devastating counter-attack. Solid preparation avoids mistakes and builds confidence. Your mock interview opponent should viciously attack you; you must anticipate everything, and prepare for anything.

Hillary Balkanizes

The more “deplorable” the better.

I have been critical, with justification, of the beta ultra-race cuck Trump and his girlish admirers in Der Movement.  But I have also praised Trump when such is deserved, particularly his role in promoting racial balkanization and sociopolitical chaos in America this electoral cycle.

As a perfect example of this is that the Trump phenomenon has goaded Hillary Clinton into unloading a massive balkanizing salvo of her own: stating publicly that ~20% of the American electorate, and higher proportion of the White American electorate, are a “basket of deplorables” – irredeemable bigots who have no place in America.

That is by all measures quite remarkable, and, truth be told, more divisive and balkanizing than anything God Emperor Donny Touchback, Prince of Amnesty, has ever said.  Thanks, Hillary.

That’s consistent with my view that one major objective of the “Patriotic Right” (broadly defined) is to provoke the “Radical Left” (broadly defined) to engage in words and actions that would further inflame tensions across racial and cultural lines, promote distrust and division, and push Whites into a more confrontational attitude (which in turn will provoke the Left even more, quickening the cascade of chaos).  The hysterical attacks against Trump and his supporters, the political violence at Trump rallies, and, now, Clinton’s verbal faux pas all demonstrate some degree of success.

This is the time to push forward with even more chaos, put the foot on the pedal, not the brake.  Here is where I am of two minds about the Alt-Right and the Alt-Wrong.  If their primary objective is a Trump electoral victory, their optimal strategy now is to lie low for the next two months.  If on the other hand, their objective is to merely leverage the Trump campaign for longer-term objectives, including the promotion of balkanization, then the best strategy is to continue trying to call attention to themselves (to the extent possible, given that the System’s fifteen minutes of interest in demonizing the Alters have passed).  The Alters need to decide between these two objectives: but if they choose the latter (and wiser) objective, then all previous comments from them about how “Trump is the last chance of White America” is laughable and basically demolishes any pretense they have of leadership and long-term strategizing.

In any case, let’s have more: hatred, division, distrust, animus, chaos, balkanization, despair, anger, disillusionment, and rage. 

The center cannot hold; it all falls apart.  

Basket of Stupidities

Trump has just been given a mediocre fastball right down the center of the plate.  Will he strike out as usual?

Read here.  Proof positive that hatred for Trump is a proxy for hatred of Whites.

Let’s say that ~40% of American voters definitely support Trump.  Therefore, Clinton asserts that one in five American voters – and of course a higher proportion of White voters – are “deplorable” and “irredeemable” and un-American.  You know, if Der Touchback had any sort of halfway decent campaign, they’d be making TV and radio and Internet commercials based on this right away.  

If you cannot capitalize on incredibly gross errors by your opponent, then you’re useless.

George P Bush and Trump

What’s all that about?

In the headlines: George P Bush urges support for Trump.

What is that about?

The Bush dynasty is clever.  They may see the handwriting on the wall, that right-wing populism is the long-range future of the GOP,  But given White worthlessness and White tendencies to “cuck,” the populist voters will always feel guilty about being “racist.”  In rides the “vibrant” George P, who will meld – in other words, co-opt – right-wing populism with diversity, big business interests, globalism, etc.  It’s all right to be a populist, George P says so!  We’re not racists!  The grown-up “little brown one” will provide a safe cover for Establishment cucks to take back the GOP from the populists.  Oh, well, the cucks need now to talk about “Americanism” rather than, say, pounding the drums about abortion or transgenders in bathrooms, but, hey, whatever works!  A nice brown face leading the populists back to the cuck reservation, with a thin veneer of “Americanist red meat” to keep them happy. It’s all worked before.  But to be credible, George P has to support Trump in 2016 (while the rest of the Bush clan undermines Der Touchback). Oh, those White rubes, they’ll buy it every time.

Of course, if Trumpism was explicitly White, this co-opting could never be attempted.  But furtive implicit Whiteness can always be controlled by cuckservatism.  And, after all, young “vibrants” like George P are the future. Old Trump is the Dead White Past.

Get with the program, all you budding White cucks!