Category: Whither HBD and the West

Merry HBD Christmas, Suckers: 2017

Some observations.

I have previously written, repeatedly, on how HBD is a political movement, with concrete political objectives, including, but not limited to, hostility to White nationalism and promotion of the competing ideology of cognitive elitism, which is a thinly disguised attempt to enhance the status and power of Jews and Asians in the USA and throughout the West as a whole.

In this regard, the obsessive promotion of the “Hajnal line” narrative can be reasonably seen as an important component of the HBD political toolkit, designed to turn Europeans against each other, and disrupt the organic solidarity of Europe, the West, and the racial nationalist project.

It is certainly interesting that one never observes HBDers – or their sycophants in Der Movement – using the Hajnal narrative against, for example, Jews (huWhite Men of the West), East Asians, or others of interest (e.g., certain non-White HBD bloggers and their offspring who look like they were expelled from their mothers by defecation rather than by parturition). No, it is always used against rowdy Russkis, drunken Micks, swarthoid Afrowops, Iberian dagoes, greasy Balkanoids, and all those nasty Cuman-derived alien Romanians dancing the Hora – all the flotsam and jetsam of Southern and Eastern Europe, as well as that of the extreme Celtic fringe.

Speaking of ethnocentrism, for example, to the extent that trait actually differs within Europe (and the refugee crisis and the European response raises the question as to whether it actually does), it’s a mysterious coincidence that the more geographically peripheral areas of Europe that have historically been the subject of multiple invasions and occupations (by both Europeans and non-Europeans) are precisely those regions thought to be more ethnocentric.  It’s almost as it – perish the thought! – that an ethnic memory of repeated invasions, occupations, repressions, etc. by various peoples, including but not limited to Mongols, Turks, Moors, Saracens, etc. (never mind the French and German invasions of Russia and the enormous loss of life those, particularly the second, caused), have left behind a population distrustful of outsiders and more willing to defend the group from such outsiders.  Baffling it all is!  And, it’s almost as if regions of Europe historically secured against repeated AfroAsiatic invasion, and which never suffered the sort of trauma inflicted on Russia from Western Europe, would naturally be – shocking it all is! – less sensitive to being “triggered” by outside incursions.

No, let’s invent all sorts of HBD theories to explain it – as long as the extreme ethnocentrism of Jews is never, ever discussed (they are huWhite, after all).  Likewise, by analogy, the “Napoleonic complex” would be explained by HBDers as some sort of “genetic inherited behavioral trait biochemically linked to shortness” and not as the result of a learned behavioral reaction to the manner in which male height differences are dealt with by society.

Curiously, the HBD propensity to explain everything biologically stops at the entrance to the synagogue or to the Chinese restaurant (with the notable exception of constantly praising Jewish and East Asian high IQ).  Certainly, we will look in vain for a treatment at Amren about how Jews are alien to the West or about how East Asians reflect Down’s syndrome phenotypes.  After all, those degenerate Romanians are still dancing the Hora – long may it turn.

It are, by the way, Type I activists who are almost exclusively the ones so easily manipulated by the HBDers; Type II activists are for the most part immune (one can only imagine what Yockey would have thought about it).  This is yet another reason why the dominance of Type I activists in Der Movement is such a disaster and why more equitable power-sharing with Type II activists is absolutely required.

Merry Christmas, all you Type I suckers!  Long may you turn on your puppet strings manipulated by your HBD puppeteers.


Whither HBD and the West

HBD vs. racial nationalism.

Let us consider this Amren comment, emphasis added:

Cretaceous Jones slargusparg • 3 hours ago

What pro White site would advocate voting for Hillary? Hillary says, if elected, she will end “racism” once and for all. That will be more devastation for Whites in the US. Perhaps this site has steered very left of what this group was founded on. John will remove my post. He removes any posts that conflict with his liberal views. He scripts the comments to back up his line of liberal thinking. One has to wonder why Taylor wants his site to be like this. I’ve read on a number of blogs that Engelman has gone to, and he is forever promoting that Taylor prefers Asians and Jewish over Whites.

Now, I do not know what Engelman writes at other blogs, I am only familiar with his drivel at Amren. But based on that drivel, I would not be surprised if what Cretaceous (nice name, by the way) says is accurate. However, even if Engelman says that, it does not mean it is true. I do not believe that Taylor actually prefers Asians and Jews over Whites. Perhaps over White ethnics, but not over Whites as a whole, particularly Anglos/Nordics.
But the point is why do comments such as that by Cretaceous Jones exist? Why is this a constant refrain; if there is smoke there must be a least a small fire smoldering somewhere.
Ultimately, the HBD/race realist school of thought is inimical to genuine racial nationalism.
Consider this, emphasis added:

On the other end of the IQ reproductive strategy distribution, immigrants from East Asian countries are outcompeting whites in gaining admission to universities and in prestigious, high-income jobs. The long-term result will be that the entire white population (not including Jews) is likely to suffer a social status decline as these new immigrants become more numerous. (Jews are unlikely to suffer a decline in social status not only because their mean IQ is well above that of the East Asians but, more importantly, because Jewish IQ is skewed toward excelling in verbal skills. The high IQ of East Asians is skewed toward performance IQ, which makes them powerful competitors in engineering and technology. See PTSDA, [Ch. 7] and Lynn [1987]. Jews and East Asians are thus likely to occupy different niches in contemporary societies.) Presently white gentiles are the most underrepresented group at Harvard, accounting for approximately 25 percent of the students, while Asians and Jews constitute at least half of the student body while constituting no more than five percent of the population (Unz 1998). The United States is well on the road to being dominated by an Asian technocratic elite and a Jewish business, professional, and media elite.

Herein lies a fundamental difference between the HBD/race realist school of thought and the racial nationalist school. The HBDers will find nothing wrong in the scenario outlined above, in which America is dominated by Asian and Jewish elites, while White Gentiles are reduced to a groveling, subaltern, low-caste servile race. Racial nationalists on the other hand – White nationalist activists – will unalterably oppose such a development. Between these two viewpoints there can be no compromise and the two views do not, and cannot, comprise elements of the same “movement.” They are opponents, not allies, even though the Pepe Brigade does not realize it yet. What will “Kek” think? For shame!