Movement Odds and Silker Ends

Points to note.

Read this important essay on the Chinese threat.

Riki on the Silkers (emphasis added):

You brought up an interesting and thought-provoking point in your comment, regarding the infiltration of the White nationalism/race realism as its new target. If that is true, which seems so at least tentatively according to the explanation you gave, this makes China all the more resemble the Jewry on the matter of internal infiltration and manipulation of the White resistance movement, something that proves my previously and repeatedly made claim on the similarity of China and Jewry, and merits our closest attention and fullest alarm. 

It is indeed ludicrous beyond belief that some people on the Right believe it’s a good thing to let the Chinese colonize and exercise control over the West to enforce border and order at gun point, which reminds of me the similar admiration of some White nationalist elements for the “strong”, “traditional” or “virile” character of the Islam or black nationalism, and hoping them to salvage the White western civilization. It is of course valuable to learn from the strengths of our adversaries, but desiring to be ruled by them is an unmistakable sign of inexorable weakness, fecklessness and cowardice and a sure recipe for ultimate failure and racial and civilization suicide as it is tantamount to giving up on our own identity and independence, rendering the whole idea of White nationalism and White racial survival utterly meaningless.

We don’t want or need immigration from India.

Another ethnonationalist fail.  Of course, Sen himself, and his involvement in “British nationalism,” is an indictment of ethnonationalism.  And the continued willingness of TOO to give hum a forum, even after the Giacomo Vallone revelations, tells you something as well.

Advertisements

Defending Universal Nationalism

Typical “movement” stupidity.

“The universal nationalist believes that one can make a case for White Nationalism that would be compelling enough, “reasonable” enough, “fair” enough to garner support from each of these biologically distinct groups.

This is absolute, unfettered nonsense.  Universal nationalism is meant as a meme for Whites, not an attempt to plead with others for our right to exist. That many – most? – Whites are so Universalist in their natural mindset that they require universalism to intrude into nationalism is a fact that needs to be dealt with.  Blame all those “high trust hunter gatherers” that the HBD faction is so fond of babbling about.  But don’t blame those who understand that the rhetoric of universal nationalism has an appeal to the innate fair mindedness of White folks.

Universal nationalism is fully compatible with “doing what it takes” to secure racial survival.  There is nothing in Salter’s book that suggests we need to care what happens to Burma or invest any energy in fighting their battles. Salterism says we need to invest in OURSELVES, while, at the same time, granting the Burmese the same right to do so. We are under no obligation to help them.  Of course, “universal nationalism” would tell us that attempts to genocide the Burmese, to colonize them, etc. is morally wrong, so, yes, On Genetic Interests is not compatible with The Turner Diaries – but I thought that the “American New Right” eschewed Pierce’s genocidal fantasies, even independent of Salter?

If the author of this piece (did he actually read Salter’s book?) is so exercised over WNs wasting their time worrying about others, then go over to the Alt Right and chastise them about their obsession with Assad of Syria.  I for one – a “universal nationalist” – really could care less about Syrians – apart from that they do not belong in White nations and that the West should not interfere with whatever civil war goes on there.  They can all kill each other off, for all I care. That’s my version of “universal nationalism.”

See the sensible comments by “Leon” in the comments thread as well.

I can’t speak for Salter, but he has every right to be annoyed at the typically doltish reception his work has received from the imbecilic “movement.”  Also interesting is that when self-styled “racial preservationists” make (in my opinion transparently disingenuous) appeals for a Universalist approach for “preserving all peoples’ no one bats an eye or utters a word of criticism. Let an academic write a book on genetic interests in which “universal nationalism” is suggested as a broad operating principle, and then it is all some sort of big problem.  In reality, “universal nationalism” is merely giving others the opportunity to defend their interests, whether they successfully do so or not is their problem.  Now, if helping others can be done without harming your own interests, fine, we can all afford to be generous, but there is no obligation to help others at your own expense.

Answering Trump: 9/14/17

Answering a liar and idiot.

Donald J. Trump‏Verified account @realDonaldTrump 2h2 hours ago

The WALL, which is already under construction in the form of new renovation of old and existing fences and walls, will continue to be built.

Reply   Reply All   Forward

Consider this.  This fat fraud, this lying huckster, this orange-hued carnival barker, this outrageous fraud, promised to BUILD A WALL, build a new coherent structure along the border between the USA and Mexico, an optimized security barrier.  But now, what do we have?  Oh, we are going to “renovate” some of our “old and existing fences and walls.” Hey, Don, maybe Orban can spare some left over chicken wire from his grand Hungarian fence (you know, the one that grinning invaders lift up and crawl under).  If I wanted to be vulgar, I’d call this butterball Trump a lying sack of shit, but to maintain standards at this blog, we’ll just say he’s a champion huckster, a con man, a hustler, whose only “4-D chess” is being played against his own base.

Donald J. Trump‏Verified account @realDonaldTrump 2h2 hours ago

Does anybody really want to throw out good, educated and accomplished young people who have jobs, some serving in the military? Really!…..

10,646 replies 5,165 retweets 20,598 likes

Does anyone want that?  Yes, you despicable fat bastard, you omega male lousy cuck, you pitiful White-hating incompetent, a sizable fraction of your base, your voters, your supporters, want that. That’s why they voted for you, you pathetic weakling.  Really….

Donald J. Trump‏Verified account @realDonaldTrump 2h2 hours ago

…They have been in our country for many years through no fault of their own – brought in by parents at young age. Plus BIG border security

6,288 replies 3,643 retweets 15,159 likes

Yes, also the children firebombed in Dresden or atom bombed in Hiroshima and Nagasaki were killed “through no fault of their own.” That’s life.  American children are being dispossessed from their own country “through no fault of their own” as well.  How about them?  Or do they, and their Trump-voting parents, not matter?  And the “BIG border security” turns out to be what? Some ad hoc “renovations?”

The Right should keep the pressure up on this issue; the omega male weakling jellyfish Trump may flip flop once again if he sees what’s left of his base abandoning him. What a moronic buffoon.

The Roaches Get Ready To Scurry

Pathetic obese, Jew-connected cuck.

Amnesty, courtesy of the Cuck Emperor.  Fake “border security” in exchange for amnesty – where have we ever heard that before?  Yeas, that’s right – the other “man on white horse” hero, Ronald Reagan.  Behold treason:

That bill would offer a path to citizenship to hundreds of thousands of young undocumented immigrants brought to American as children who graduated high school or obtained a GED and pursued higher education, served in the military or worked lawfully for several years.
The meeting comes one week after Trump announced plans to phase out the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, and surprised Republicans by cutting a deal with Democratic leaders on hurricane relief, government funding and extending the nation’s debt limit.
The dinner also followed a flurry of bipartisan meetings at the White House. Trump, at a meeting with moderate Republicans and Democrats Wednesday afternoon, pushed for action on a legislative fix for DACA, but supported pairing it with border security, according to Rep. Kurt Schrader, D-Oregon.
It’s unclear how far any agreement can proceed on Capitol Hill without buy in from Republicans controlling both chambers.
In a statement Wednesday following a DACA meeting between Pelosi, House Speaker Paul Ryan and other top lawmakers, Ryan spokeswoman AshLee Strong said GOP leaders believe “any solution needs to address border security and enforcement, which are the root causes of the problem. Discussions among the Republican conference will continue in the coming weeks.”

Good to see Ryan is further to the right than Trump on this.  But, hey, look at the Antifa issue – Pelosi is further to the right than Trump.  It’s not really hard to be on Trump’s right these days.  Even Karl Marx could probably manage it.

Antifa good, White patriots bad:

The White House signaled that President Donald Trump plans to sign a joint resolution passed by Congress Tuesday condemning white supremacists, neo-Nazis and Ku Klux Klan members in the wake of violence sparked by a white nationalist rally last month in Charlottesville, Virginia.

Let this all come to pass, and I WILL hold the “movement” accountable for its blind Trump worship, its endless bad judgement and obsessively repeated “man on white horse” escapades, its fervent embrace of ethnic affirmative action, and its patent dishonesty in refusing to acknowledge its error with Trump.  I’ll wait.  The other shoe will drop soon enough.  Meanwhile, enjoy the spectacle of Roissy’s homoerotic fervor, sweatily writing about Trump’s “compliance game” and “poon commandments,” while Alt Righters scribble about “4-D chess,” and the Alt Wrongers, like roaches exposed to light, scurry away to their HBD hovels.

I’ll wait.  And when the far-left, anti-White, omega male cuck Trump unleashes betrayal on the base, Der Movement will be exposed, at least here, as the travesty it really is.

A Failed Brand

Against the Alt Right.

My view is that we should abandon the Alt Right “brand” entirely. It only functioned when it was sufficiently vague to allow there to be a conversation between White Nationalists and people who were closer to the mainstream, which allowed White Nationalists to make converts and build connections. But Andrew Anglin and Richard Spencer have pursued a strategy of polarization between the Alt Right and what is now called the Alt Lite that has deprived the term of its original utility. So they can keep it.

Readers of this blog are aware that I have never been a supporter of the “big tent” approach.  Nevertheless, it must be said that the only way that approach would have worked for the “Alt Right brand” was if it was always made explicitly clear that the Alt Right was nothing more or less than an umbrella group of various disparate rightist factions: hardcore White nationalists, ethnonationalists, Identitarians, Alt Lite civic nationalists, Alt Wrong HBD “race realists,” more extreme Paleocons, Game-Manosphere types, Southern nationalists, etc. Unfortunately, that approach was incoherent from the very beginning.

At the same time the “big tent” approach was promoted, we were also being told that “the Alt Right is the movement” and “the Alt Right is White nationalism” and “the Alt Right is White nationalism or it is nothing at all.” Then came Hailgate, the continued identification of the Alt Right with its more “extreme” elements, and the fallout ensued.

Thus, hardcore White nationalists resented being lumped together with civic nationalist cucks, execrable HBD specimens like Derbyshire, homoerotic Trump fanboys and other hedonistic “game” “pussy nerd” nihilists, and all the rest.  Likewise, various non-WN Alt Right factions resisted association with “racist Nazi haters,” or anyone who dared to offend Jews or Orientals, or any “blackpiller” who dared to criticize “God Emperor” Trump.  And of course, besides these serious ideological splits, there were those who objected to having the “movement” conflated with the Alt Right’s juvenile jackassery (politely called by the euphemism “youth culture”), and so there was a generational split as well.

Predictably – and some of us, predictably, did predict it – the “shotgun marriage” of the Alt Right fell apart.  The Alt Lite tried to take the brand for themselves; failing that, they dissociated themselves from the Alt Right proper (which returned the favor), less “extreme” Alt Wrong elements “threw Spencer under the bus” after Hailgate, there were personal feuds between various racial nationalist/Identitarian/ethnonationalist factions of the Alt Right, and so there has been significant degeneration of the “brand” from its heyday of 2016.

What is the Alt Right now?  White nationalism Lite?  Racial nationalism for Millennials? Beavis-and-Butthead White nationalism?  The vanguard of the Iranian Renaissance?

While my reasons differ from those of Greg, I mirror his call for the rest of you folks to abandon the Alt Right brand.  Indeed, with analogy to the “only Nixon could go to China” meme, it would be optimal if Spencer himself would abandon the Alt Right brand, allowing for a “re-set” that hopefully would include lessons learned from errors made by the Alt Right.

Cat Lady Observations

Cat ladies.

Comparative behavioural observations were made in the home setting in order to analyze the ethology of the human-cat relationship. Factors postulated, and indeed, found to influence that relationship included marital status of the human (women living alone, with a partner or with a partner and children)…

Relevance to EGI?   In Western nations, women have the right to vote (typically to the left of men), women can become political leaders (hello, Merkel), and thus “cat ladies” can determine the downward path of Western civilization, destroying our (and their own) genetic interests, and leaving a trail of ruin and lamentation in their wake.

The solution is not “game” – men groveling to female sexual power – but, instead, men retaking control of their nations and their civilization, enforcing traditional sex roles, and forcing the “cat ladies” out of politics and back into the shadows where their greatest decision would be what brand of cat food to buy for their feline “significant other(s).”