Xenophobia Is Good Mental Health

There are many legitimate forms of trepidation.

Note that damage to the amygdala can result in an individual unable to recognize dangerous situations, an individual always in trouble, and an individual whose genetic interests are endangered by the inability to actualize prudent and reasonable caution.

The amygdala is also important for race recognition, and I have previously written about my hypothesis on autism, that ties together the various functions of this brain structure into a coherent whole, and which points put the potential dangers of South Asian phenotypes to young White children.

Getting back to the main point here: can we not say that an absence of xenophobia – in other words, typical liberal universalism – is akin to a defect in the amygdala that impairs the recognition of the danger of the racial other?  Isn’t the typical xenophile leftist akin to someone walking around with a damaged brain with a damaged amygdala?  Isn’t racial liberalism than akin to brain damage, and isn’t then xenophobia akin to mental and neurological good health?

Then we get into the question of race-mixing.

Putting aside the issue of casual miscegenation (which is bad enough), let us consider the gross enormity of actually producing children with someone of a different race; let us consider the horror of inter-racial marriage. Of inter-racial family formation: spending your life with, and reproducing with, an alien life form.  What can we see about the amygdala of such a person?  What kind of defect must hey have in their mentality, in their brain circuitry?  Can any such person be trusted?  Why would WNs embrace any individual who “sleeps with the enemy” and who donates their genetic material to produce more of your racial enemies?  Aren’t the ones who embrace such individuals mentally damaged themselves?


The Strategic Objective

Nietzsche’s child rather than lion (or camel) – a constructive thesis.

Let’s first consider two points that form the foundation of the thesis of this post.

Point 1. A primary objective of terrorism and guerrilla warfare is to provoke repressive measures from the government, which will negatively affect the population, alienating and radicalizing that population, and turning them against the government.

This is generally true, and as I recall was favorably mentioned by Pierce in The Turner Diaries.

Note that while this statement derives from historical examples of political violence, it can also apply to memetic “terrorism” and “warfare” as well.  Thus, discussion of Point 1 does not in any way imply advocacy of actual physical terrorism or guerrilla warfare (which are, by the way, primarily performed by the political Left), but instead illustrates the point – the historically demonstrated fact – that provoking a government to repress its people typically generates hatred of the people toward that government, to the benefit of the adversaries of that government.

Point 2. Revolutions typically do not take place during the time of the greatest repression, but rather occur when that repression is suddenly relaxed.

This point (previously mentioned at this blog) is also generally true.  Note that the System either consciously or unconsciously recognizes this to be so, since its reaction to Trumpism and the brief rise of the Alt Right has been to viciously double down on the repression and on its anti-White narrative. They have absolutely rejected the path of concessions and reconciliation.

Obviously, Points 1 and 2 are not fully compatible with each other, which allows a prudent strategy of provocation to present to the System a dilemma manifested by a choice between two unpleasant, and ultimately destructive, alternatives.

If the System responds to Far Right provocations with increasing repression – and it is fundamentally important that the repression must be distributed among at least a sizable fraction of the White population and not just tightly targeted to the Far Right – then it will alienate and radicalize that portion of the population (Whites) on which the System’s own effective function, and its overall long-term viability, depends.  The System will lose moral authority as it props itself up by using the same terror it purports to fight.  

With the loss of moral authority comes more resistance, and while Revolution per se may not occur during this period of great repression, the loss of moral authority, and the cycle of repression, hatred, resistance, and more repression cannot go on forever. Eventually a breaking point will be reached in which the System can no longer be tenable while repressing and attacking the very population necessary for ensuring the System’s efficient maintenance; the System will either break down and collapse under the weight of what is essentially a runaway, and ultimately fatal, autoimmune reaction (i.e., attacking its own body after being exposed to an antigen), or it will be forced to attempt to salvage the situation by making concessions, leading us to Point 2. 

On the other hand, if the System wants to avoid the scenario of Point 1, sensing that if it pushes Whites too far and too fast it will eventually lose everything, or if tries repression and it fails, and it starts making concessions (relaxing the repression, Point 2), then the System loses moral authority by looking weak, tacitly admitting that its Far Right adversary has legitimacy, and admitting that White interests and White opposition to the System are at least partially valid.  This will lead to a “snowball” effect as increasing concessions lead to increasing legitimacy for White demands and thus further concessions, undermining the System’s whole raison d’etre of anti-Whiteness.  

As long as the Far Right is prudent enough to keep up the pressure, keep up the demands, keep up the provocations, keep up the memetic war, keep on “heightening the contradictions,” then the loss of moral authority for the System will become irreversible and lead to the loss of political, economic, and social authority as well.  Keep in mind that Coloreds, with their sense of entitlement and hatred of Whites, will see any concessions to White interests as a betrayal by the System (which they see, all grievance rhetoric aside, as THEIR System), further weakening the System’s moral authority, and making the System have to choose between placating sets of incompatible tribal interests. The endpoint is collapse, perhaps from different mechanisms as the collapse of Point 1, but collapse nevertheless.

The System would try to solve this dilemma by doing what it is doing now – attempting to specifically target repression to a relatively small subset of Whites, including the Far Right itself, while slowing down White dispossession enough so as to “boil the frog slowly.”  More recently, with the hysterical reaction to Trumpism, this strategy is starting to fray, and repression is more and more leaking out to the general White population.  In a very real sense, that general repression has always been with us – forced integration, affirmative action, racial double standards, mass immigration, political correctness, social pricing, hate crimes laws, hate speech laws in Europe, etc. – but it is becoming more obvious now.  This demonstrates the validity of this post’s general thesis – if something as mild as Trumpism, and as inept as the Alt Right, could provoke the System as much as it has, and “dropped the mask” to the general White population, what would a serious and strategic strategy of (memetic) Far Right provocation achieve?  Thus, any movement would need to create conditions so that backlash against it would affect Whites outside of that movement, so as to put “in play” the various processes outlined in this post. For example, serious and authentic community activism and political engagement would create ties between the Far Right and the broader White population, so that repression targeted at the former would be necessity negatively affect the latter.  Of course, we need intelligent, disciplined, and rational Type II activists to plan these strategies; Type I activists have demonstrated, time and again, their inability to effectively manage (or even attempt) these approaches.

Before we conclude with an outline of things to do, let us briefly consider: how could an alternative System – for example, a racial nationalist System – avoid being placed in the sort of dilemma outlined here?  Simple: by representing the interests of the people, by supporting majority rights rather than that of minorities, by making Whites into authentic stakeholders in the System and its well-being.  Whites have long since stopped being authentic stakeholders in the current System, in any real sense, long ago.

What to do? The following have been discussed at this blog in detail previously, but briefly we can summarize:

1. Build a legionary cadre.  No defectives, no Alt Right lulzers, no obsessives and fetishists, no zombies mindlessly parroting “movement” dogma, but hardcore, “vanguardist” political soldiers, truly vetted (extremely!) and put through years of long apprenticeship, a genuine movement akin to that of Codreanu, a pan-European Brotherhood that will form the core of the undermining of the old System and the creation of a new one.  And guess what?  This is not talked about in “interviews” with the media, it is not recruited online in sniggering “forums,” it is instead done privately and prudently, slowly, carefully, and with forethought.  Obviously, the existence of such an organization would not be a secret, just as the existence of the CIA, MI6, KGB, and GRU were not secrets, but the inner workings of the group, by analogy to those others, would of course be hidden from the public.  

2. Community activism.  Real community activism is done, not talked about.  It is done as much as possible “under the radar.”  You do not broadcast it to mocking media operatives, you don’t go through the motions for the sake of a quick blog post, this is not something done overnight.  True community activism is for the long-term, it is a work of years, it is done to help the community, not with an attitude of expecting an immediate compensation – the idea of compensation should not come into it at all. Of course, community activism by its nature cannot be kept secret; the point is that such activism is its own publicity – in other words, it becomes known because it occurs and it is effective, it is its own advertisement, it doesn’t become known because activists spend more time talking to the media than they do actually helping people.

3. Metapolitics and infrastructure. Metapolitics has been discussed endlessly by the Far Right, and so there is no need to repeat all of that here. Such activity is essential, as long as it is fresh, creative, and open-minded, and not merely the regurgitation of fossilized “movement” dogma.  We need real infrastructure to carry out our objectives, approaches to defeat social pricing, funding that goes beyond tin cup panhandling but actual involves earning money through some sort of productivity, service, and/or representation, we need lawyers (and not to drive them out of the “movement”), we need businessmen, doctors, academics, plumbers, mechanics, schoolteachers, politicians, we need a recreated and actualized society. By the way, metapolitics should include Salter’s democratic multiculturalism, which overlaps with both community activism and electoral politics.

4. Electoral politics. This has three purposes.  First, education, propaganda, and recruitment.  Second, provocation, heightening the contradictions, undermining the System, promoting chaos and balkanization.  Third, if elected, these people can not only leverage their office for the preceding two purposes, but also to protect the movement as much as possible,

5. Rallies, etc. – false-flag and genuine. False-flag rallies are meant as a distraction, to focus attention of adversaries to the open and superficial “cosplay actors on the street” as opposed to the more serious work going on elsewhere.  It would still need to be credible, to be viewed as a genuine threat and so worthy of attention, and also so as not to repulse Whites interested in joining the cause.  Later on, with the success of the other objectives 1-4 above, rallies and mass meetings, of a highly professional nature (even more so that the false-flag ones), can occur for all the positives such events can genuinely provide to a real and growing firmly established movement.

The Present Puny and Worthless Race

Der Movement Stupidity.

I’m writing an important piece on “The Strategic Objective” (which will, of course, be completely ignored by Der Movement once posted here); in the meantime, some brief news.

Read this.

Ordinarily, I don’t link to Counter-Currents, but if Greg Johnson wants to do some of my work for me by discrediting the Beavis-and-Butthead Brigade, then link I will.  The problem with that is that Johnson doesn’t go far enough in his criticism, particularly self-criticism over the Hermansson and Lewis infiltrations and his own hysterical, thin-skinned “banning” of anyone who has the temerity to hold him accountable for that (or for anything else). And his own feuding with Spencer (“no truce!”) has been one of the problems. 

Will Bolton’s book ever be mentioned at Counter-Currents?  I hope so; I hope anti-Arktos attitudes won’t get in the way of that.

But, hey, thanks Greg, for letting me know about Red Ice.  The disintegration of the Alt Right proceeds apace.

Johnson won’t tell you though that (despite negative attitudes toward Spencer since 2014 [at least]), Greg was all on-board with the “Alt Right brand” (big tent! big tent!) up until Hailgate and Feudgate, while I (and Strom) was opposed to Alt Right stupidity from the very beginning (and said so not only here but at Counter-Currents comments threads as well). All down the memory hole!


Is somebody monitoring these reporters when they are “embedded,” or are they just allowed to skulk around unsupervised? Has it crossed anyone’s mind that these snoops might be passing along intelligence to the ADL, SPLC, antifa, and law enforcement?

All true, but coming from someone who let Hermansson and Lewis “skulk around unsupervised” at “extreme vetted meetings” this is just a bit too much – chutzpah that goes beyond what one would find at a yarmulke factory.

A commentator writes to Johnson:

At this point, either Anglin is the leader of White Nationalism in America, or you and Anglin are

Cue snare drums and audience laughter.


…we need to penalize attention whores who are building their brands at the expense of the greater movement.

Yes, indeed, I agree completely.  Does Greg have a mirror handy?

White Nationalism 3.0 will be hammered out by Counter-Currents and advocates of American Nationalism like James Allsup, Identity Europa, Anglin & Weev, and Mike Enoch.

Gee, WN 2.0 didn’t last that long, did it?  We’re now getting ready for 3.0.  And look who Johnson thinks will be riding to our rescue. The complete lack of self-awareness is mind-boggling.  These guys couldn’t hammer their way out of a paper bag, much less hammer out an authentic movement. Where is Charles Martel (or Thor) when we need him?  Hammer away!

A commentator:

Tall, thin, attractive, Nordic, well dressed, are all words that come to mind when I think of these guys. This is where the American movement should be.

Sure, that’s the criteria necessary to decide who is appropriate.  After all, it has worked out so well before.  Bring back Patrik Hermansson!  I’m sure he’d like to help with future “extreme vetting.”  But, wait, you guys already have tall, thin, attractive Nordics like Mike Enoch, so you’re all set! 

It’s WN 3.0!  Or WN 30.0!  Or WN Googolplex.0!

These guys think all the iterations of WN are getting better.  They are wrong.  One is reminded of the age-old wisdom:

But Time, which wears out every thing, introduced a more degenerate Race; so that every succeeding Generation is grown more corrupt than the preceding, till we are dwindled down to the present puny and worthless Race.

Indeed.  WN 2.0, 3.0, ad infinitum. Whites as a whole, in fact.  By the way, the growing success of The Black Panther movie is in large part due to the White audience. “The present puny and worthless Race.”


Will these people ever go away?
Not as long as the movement lets a hostile press declare who our leaders are.


Will these people (including the WN 3.0 crowd) ever go away?
Not as long as the “movement” is dominated by Type I activists who practice ethnic affirmative action.

Now, for all about the Afrowops:

Leonard here basically moves into Farrell territory.

Looking at the trends you’d almost think the historically and genetically more germanic north had different instincts than the heavily mixed south.

Yes, because Salvini, just by looking at him, could easily be mistaken for Dolph Lundgren’s younger brother.

By the way, the Italian people would not be “ungovernable” if the worst 10-20% of the population (both north and south) was culled, leaving the more healthy elements behind.  The Campanian 5 Star hero Di Maio looks like a Pakistani for example (a handcuffed Greg Conte weeps softly).  And let’s not forget the northerners – the young Mussolini looked like the younger brother of General Mapache from The Wild Bunch. If that’s reflective of the underlying genetics then no wonder it’s “ungovernable.”  Why should the healthy 80-90% suffer because of a botched minority?

Roissy claims that some of his best friends are “pasta naggers.”  Fair enough.  After all, some of my best friends are cuck naggers, so it all balances out well in the end.

Another important step forward for The God Emperor!  Pepe (and Roissy) weeps.

The Dying Alt Right and Other News

News. Satire. It’s all one.

Is the Alt Right dying?

It is more and more looking like Sallis is going to be right once again, as I’ve repeatedly predicted that the fever dream (nightmare) of the Alt Right is going to end, sooner or later, but the speed of the collapse is even taking me by surprise.  The loss of Bristow is devastating, absolutely devastating.

And of course the anti-White scum crow in delight:

“Everyone in the alt-right is a malignant contrarian,” Lenz said about the growing divisions in their movement following the united front the alt-right displayed in Charlottesville. “They come from a culture where insults are the coin of the realm.”

But, but, but…I thought it was only “White Nationalism 1.0” that could be so categorized?  Oh wait, I was right about this as well, although that’s nothing, the equivalent of “being right” about stating that “the sun will rise tomorrow morning.”

The association of “the movement” with the Alt Right means that racial nationalism in America will be damaged (once again!) by this latest fiasco, proving right those who warned that a too-close association with racial nationalism with one relatively juvenile and inept faction will be the downfall of any progress made as a result of Trumpian chaos and balkanization.

Leave it to our fearless leaders to go from the (admittedly overwrought) euphoria of November 2016 to the grim ashes of March 2018.

I guess that whole Legion Europa thing looks at least a little bit better in hindsight, no?  But of course that project wouldn’t do, would it.  It just didn’t have “all the trimmings,” so to speak, right?

Enjoy the collapse. It’s a long way down.  

And you have no one to blame but yourselves.  A “movement” based on Type I leaders and Type I followers, in today’s age of 24/7 media coverage, social media, heightened analysis, sophisticated police state tactics, well-funded “watchdog groups,” organized Far-Left domestic terrorists enabled by TrumpCuck and HowdySessions, is destined to fail.  What’s needed is less Type I empty bravado and more Type II cunning and planning.

Read this.

My understanding of the situation is that this woman used her own photograph on her pseudonymous activist social media account, used a pseudonym that was slightly different from her real name (Tiana Dalichov vs. Dayanna Volitich), and discussed detailed aspects of her IRL job while essentially indirectly taunting her employers (Agreed with a guest that white supremacists need to infiltrate schools and become teachers and said, “I’m absolutely one of them.” Said on her podcast that she had put on a “dog and pony” show for administrators, telling her students that when administrators showed up, “I’m going to be different than I usually am. I just don’t want you to be shocked, I want you to play along.”).

So, yes, I agree, that must have been satire.  I mean, a serious activist with a podcast and a social media account wouldn’t have done all of that, would they?  Well, Der Movement as a whole is satire, so how could anyone tell the difference?

I’ve written about this before, but I would be a strong supporter of Pierce’s “table-leg therapy” theory if I was not such a committed pacifistic humanist. Emphasis added:

Table-leg Therapy
Senator Fulbright and the Reverend Berrigan are still on the wrong side of every issue except Palestine, and they are on the right side of that issue for the wrong reasons.
In other words, liberals — including the consistent ones — are just as sick as ever and just as dangerous to the future of America as ever. The only way the great majority of them will get their thinking straight, eventually, is with a sturdy, oak table leg applied smartly and repeatedly alongside the head.
Nevertheless, the present dissension in liberal ranks is of inestimable value. It is the most fervent and influential of the liberals who are now taking an anti-Zionist position, and their numbers and influence are growing daily.

Can we skip the optional Asian (girl) friend?

But, but, but…the great and good Desmond Jones says that Italy is absolutely ethnically homogenous and will remain so until the end of time, forever and ever, amen.

Solution: these Nigerians are actually Sicilians.  It’s the mafia after all, and, as we know, real Nigerians are actually lighter-complexioned, more gracile, and racially more European than are the Sicilian Afrowops.

Der News, News, News, 3/5/18

It’s Der Movement!

First: an unannounced odyssey.  Every couple of months I search Amazon to see if Bolton’s Yockey book had been published (as well as checking Far-Right sites for an announcement).

Lo and behold!

I’ll read that Kindle when I finish the sets of books I’m tackling now (Late Western Roman Empire, and also a new Hitler biography is gathering dust here and I need to get to that at some point). But for now I ask: why hasn’t this book publication been announced and promoted at various Far-Right sites?  This is an important development and we have to search it out as if it was being hidden.

Sometimes Der Movement baffles me, it really does.

So let EGI Notes make the announcement:


Nicholas Farrell, who is not an ethnic Italian but lives in Italy, sighs loudly once again about those stupid and unruly Afrowops:

The Fascist dictator Benito Mussolini, comparing himself to Michelangelo and Italians to marble—the raw material the Renaissance genius used to fashion his sculptures—once complained to German journalist Emil Ludwig: “It’s the raw material that I lack. Governing the Italians is not impossible. It is useless.”
Since the fall of Il Duce in 1945, Italy has had 65 governments, and today the Italians return to the polls to choose the 66th. Incredibly, for non-Italians at least…

Yeah Farrell, it’s all like real terrible and all.  How about leaving Italy then?

A new “movement” disease called the Farrell-Munro-Deasy Syndrome: live in, or at least visit, someone else’s nation (as an ethnic alien), complain about and insult the natives, with marrying a native woman optional (while mocking the men…an omnidominant ploy? Perhaps those “farther from human origins” are more “omnidominant?”).

So far I have no reason to include that Leonard (AltRight.com) fellow in this syndrome; while he lives In Italy he so far has not attacked the natives.

Read this.

This is a vehemently pacifist blog, advocating complete non-violence in the grand Gandhian tradition, a beacon of human love and compassion, unalterably opposed to the use of any force whatsoever.  Turn the other cheek!  However, on a purely theoretical basis, purely hypothetically, what if, the next time some “extreme right leader” is “violently attacked by protestors” that some identified extreme left activist thug simply disappears?  Vanished, never to be seen again. What happened to them?  A mystery it all is!  Such a course of action is of course despicable and denounced by this blog in the strongest possible terms, it must never happen, we denounce it utterly, but, hypothetically speaking, purely theoretically, it may make the thugs think twice the next time they decide to do their usual ten-on-one “sucker punch” style attacks on rightists.  But self-defense for rightists contravenes the hardcore humanist views of this blog so it must of course never ever occur. Never, never, never!  Rightists must of course be attacked with complete impunity, with the Left fearing no payback whatsoever.

After all, why should a “movement” ostensibly based upon concepts of national greatness, masculinity, virility, force, and Faustian overcoming ever defend itself?  Do nothing, meekly allow yourselves to be assaulted, and then cry for the authorities (who hate you) to step in – that’s the ticket!

By the way, that happened while a “hardcore conservative” is President of Sicily.

Sound familiar? Just like how Trump and Sessions look the other way when Antifa run wild in the streets of America, even though Der Touchback and Der Howdy have the power to declare that group a terrorist organization and fully unleash federal law enforcement on them.

In any case, isn’t it clear that “extreme right” leaders need bodyguards when venturing out in public?  It’s even obvious to an ultra-pacifist and lover of humanity as me that the “extreme right” needs to form paramilitary groups to defend their politicians, speakers, and leaders, within the scope of existing law. 

Read here. That is why we need POPA.

The Alt Right is White Nationalism 0.5

Pretentious Millennial retards do not a movement make.

Now that AltRight.com is back on line, it’s time to post this, which was written several weeks ago.

Contention: Despite their protestations to the contrary, the Alt Right, exemplified by AltRight.com, but also including Counter-Currents and all the rest, is no different from, and no better than, the “Boomer” and “Generation X” White Nationalism 1.0 that the smug, navel-gazing Millennials love to critique.

Here’s a brief list of some of the most important internal factors which prevented White Nationalism 1.0 from achieving its goals:

Radical Individualism

White Nationalism 1.0 was a much smaller movement and disproportionately attracted an audience of edge cases. These people are extreme non-conformists and expressive individualists. 

Unlike the Alt Righters showing up at rallies like refugees from a cosplay convention.

This stratum of the population is always found at the fringes of society and have a personality type that is resistant to social conditioning. The same characteristic that initially opened their minds to our message holds back the larger social movement when they reach a critical mass.

Unlike the majestic Alt Right, which took advantage of Trumpism to reach out to a wider audience, or did they (“reach out” not including making drunken podcasts or running people down with cars)?  

There are legions of these ornery people out there who are naturally disagreeable and incapable of finding common ground and working with others to advance a common purpose. They are a familiar figure in all marginalized extremist movements. The low trust, anonymous nature of online messageboards is the perfect breeding ground for their worst tendencies.

Unlike the Alt Right, where personalities like Spencer, Friberg, Johnson, TRS, and Jorjani mesh together agreeably and harmoniously.

These gadflys are commonly found engaging in shit stirring and crank spiraling and the distractions they create prevented White Nationalism 1.0 from moving forward. Some common examples of this are unfounded accusations that various people in the movement are secret Jews or homosexuals or enemy agents and other types of conspiracy theories.

Unlike the Alt Right, which, as exemplified by the personalities mentioned above, and their allies, who certainly never – ever! – accuse each other of being CIA plants, gay groomers, buddies with Antifa, Jews, etc.  If you think differently – it’s all “Boomer” lies!

Extreme Message

In many cases, the message of White Nationalism 1.0 was simply too extreme. Many of these people were just unable to communicate with their peers. Their message and presentation was stupid, vicious, crazy or ugly. It was easier for the opposition to brand these people with stereotypes and marginalize them. They responded to their rejection by seeing themselves as part of a chosen few

So, joking about “Jewish children in boxcars” like the Alt Right lulzers do – that’s not “too extreme.”  Considering all Europeans deriving from the south of Vienna (or Munich) and the east of Berlin to be functionally equivalent to Africans and Asians is not “too extreme” either.  Even worse: not only does the Alt Right share the usual 1.0 disdain for Southern and Eastern Europeans, but now they’ve become obsessed with hating the Irish.  Repeating the Know Nothing movement is all real progressive and all.  The Alt Right is All Right!

Negative Atmosphere

We didn’t use the term at the time, but White Nationalism 1.0 could be a “black pill” for its target audience. The chaos and dysfunction created by all the edge cases led to a negative atmosphere. In turn, this led to years of stagnation which led to many people getting demoralized and dropping out of the movement while others were deterred from becoming more active.

Unlike the Alt Right, in which vicious feuding, throwing each other under the bus, womanly gossip, extreme disdain for White ethnics, gross incompetence, and constant panhandling creates a warm and fuzzy “white pill” positive atmosphere. It’s all great for morale and recruiting!

Marginal Figures

As Brett Stevens has pointed out, many of the people who were willing to step forward and become public leaders of White Nationalism 1.0 weren’t the best people.

Well, that’s even more true today.  The folks willing to step forward and become public leaders of “White Nationalism 2.0” aren’t the best people; these are people who have nothing to lose one way or the other.  Lulzing retards, panhandlers, fetishists, cosplay costume actors, idiots who think that “extreme vetting” is asking “are you Swedish?,” folks who took Jorjani seriously and brought us the blessings of Charlottesville 2.0 – are these supposed to be the “best people?”  They are below marginal.  Pierce was a physicist for godssakes, that’s more marginal than the Beavis-and-Butthead crew?  Really, now.


The violent wing of White Nationalism 1.0 would periodically lash out in mass shootings. Usually, this accomplished nothing but creating a wave of negative publicity for the movement.

Certainly, the Alt Right and their rallies have never been associated with violence, no sir.

Impractical Mindset

White Nationalism 1.0 was far too focused on violent, apocalyptic scenarios in the distant future. It thought much less about the here and now, how to create a bridge between the present the future, the small steps that need to be taken to get us on the path to achieving our goals. “Naming the Jew” became a fixation for many of these people. 

The Alt Right of course never mentions Jews at all.  Except when they accuse each other of being Jews, are married to Jews, and/or joke about putting Jews into ovens.

What do you do after the Jew has been named though?

You dress up like Captain America, go to Charlottesville, and then run when things get hot.

Narrow Message

I agree with Brett Stevens that White Nationalism 1.0 was too narrow. The message often never got beyond a desire to be rid of all the Jews and non-Whites. Even if that were accomplished, many of these people failed to realize that it is the nature of liberal democracy itself which leads to this outcome. The system naturally exhausts, disintegrates and perverts its host culture. The presence of Jews exacerbates its worst tendencies and acts as a catalyst that accelerates the timetable.

White Nationalism 2.0 is broad indeed.  Not only do the 2.0 leaders get along famously, but the ties between Alt Right and Alt Lite are tighter than ever!  Behold the Big Tent!

Failure To Exploit The Internet

The internet was a great new tool, but it was misused in its earliest years. The rise of online forums was a double-edged sword. It brought countless new people into the movement and successfully educated them in our beliefs and values, but it also gave them a safe outlet for role playing. White Nationalism 1.0 never got beyond shitposting on forums and remained bottled up online.

While 2.0 gives us drunken shitpodcasting.  Good work.

Prioritizing Politics

I think the biggest error of White Nationalism 1.0 was prioritizing politics. This ossified over time into the strategic division between mainstreamers and vanguardists. The mainstreamers believed in ultimate political victory through winning elections while the vanguardists believed in either violent revolution or creating small groups of the chosen few and waiting for the collapse of civilization.

Wow, it’s a good thing the Alt Right didn’t get all wrapped up with Trump and his campaign.  The refreshing sense of distance that the Alt Right always maintained from Trumpism is to their credit now that Trump is The Cuck Emperor. Tragicomedy.

Neither of these strategies worked because politics is downstream from culture. The mainstreamers were always politically marginalized and contained by the dominant taboos. The vanguardists were either perceived as destructive when they lashed out in violent acts or they spent all their time preaching to the choir which limited their influence and effectiveness. Both groups took White identity and various other cultural assumptions for granted which were no longer shared by their target audience which had become a herd of pleasure seeking, deracinated individualists.

As opposed to today, where the Alt Right has been so successful in turning the masses into racially aware heroes that the ethnostate is just around the corner.  However, when you look around that corner, just watch out for Leftist flamethrowers, ramming cars, and Trump signing congressional orders denouncing you and marshaling federal resources against you.

The Alt Right = White Nationalism 0.5. The same dogma, the same marginal personalities, the same propensity to “acting out” violence, the same freakishness, as version 1.0, but coarsened and worsened by dumbing it all down for Internet “youth culture.”

Odds and Ends, 3/3/18

Der Movement. In all cases, emphasis added.

Trump: Just take their guns.


Mr. Magoo or Howdy Doody?

Remember Roissy and his “Sessions as Attorney General alone justifies the Trump Presidency!”  The train wreck that is the Donald Cuck Presidency is a gift that keeps on giving.

Derb is smarter than Roissy:

After watching this last show, however, I have to admit, despair is getting hard to fend off. Trump was simply terrible. As in the January meeting, he agreed enthusiastically with the last person who spoke, even when that person had said the opposite thing to what the previous person had said. I found myself thinking: Does Trump actually understand words and meanings? This is the Great Negotiator?

Meanwhile, Roissy is busy telling us how much he “loves Trump” (no kidding) – onanism alert!  After all, hiring “hot babes” and making middle school-level comments about boys having sex with female teachers is all we want or need in a President.

More Derb:

I liked the clip anyway, mainly for the delectable lisp of the female reporter, Yukari Kondo. “Finding a company to herrp them re-rocate is a charrenge …” Should Ms Kondo visit New York any time, I’d be glad to buy her lunch just for the pleasure of hearing her talk.

Derb is infatuated with (some aspect of) an Asian female?  Say it ain’t so!

The Alt Righters are back!

Get ready for comments about how (S.) Italians are Negroid mongrels!