Good CvH speech and other news.
This is a good von Hoffmeister speech. Note that he rejects “twigs and branches” “hobbit hole” reactionary “traditionalism” and supports a technological and futurist approach forward for Whites.
He’s also correct about “testing” – particularly given all the problems identified at this blog. I would only quibble that instead of saying “look White, identify as White” – which can include all sorts of NECs – merely say “of European descent,” i.e.., ancestry from of one (or more) of historical European ethnies.
But, overall, I strongly endorse the speech and recommend that readers share it far and wide.
By the way, is CvH “sane” and “decent” enough for Johnson to debate? While it is true that only Sallis is qualified to defend Sallisism, since Johnson runs from that, what about CvH then? Or is he, like Woods, “not up to it?”
They could, for example, debate pan-Europeanism vs. petty nationalism as well as technics-oriented futurism vs. hobbit hole “traditionalism.” However, I cannot speak for CvH and do not know if he has any interest in debating Johnson or anyone else. I merely suggest that if Johnson is too cowardly to engage with the Sallis Groupuscule, then these issues can be addressed by a “pinch hitter” or “designated hitter” who has significant, albeit not total, overlap with Sallis.
I’ve been saying that for years, Quota Queen.
If you really want to see Gaslighting Greg’s deficiencies on display, see this.
eginotes 