Race and Der Movement. In all cases, emphasis added.
The average reader may not know this, but Hela cells are often a big problem in the biomedical cell culture laboratory environment – the cells are aggressive and invasive (surprise!), resulting in significant cross-contamination of other, more unique and valuable, cell cultures.
However, 20 years after Henrietta Lacks’ death, mounting evidence suggested that HeLa cells contaminated and overgrew other cell lines. Cultures, supposedly of tissues such as breast cancer or mouse, proved to be HeLa cells. We describe the history behind the development of HeLa cells, including the first published description of Ms Lacks’ autopsy, and the cell culture contamination that resulted.
Many labs therefore want nothing to do with that cell line, in order to preserve the integrity – dare we say “purity?”- of their other cell culture stocks. Interesting analogies can be made to other, broader, societal, situations.
I have two points to make about this.
First, we should not be surprised that Fukuyama preaches to Whites memes that will inevitably lead to their destruction. As EGI Notes tells you time and time again: The existential meaning of Asians is hatred of Whites.
Second, we see Greg once again engaging in the most outrageous and dishonest gaslighting – this time trying to convince you that WWI and WWII were not due to petty ethnonationalism, but a lack thereof.
You see, “WWI was not a war of nations, but of empires.” The empires did it! It were all the South Asians of India, the Algerians of North Africa, the Egyptians, the Negroes of German South West Africa, the Siberians – they were the ones pushing the honest and humble ethnonationalists of Great Britain, France, the Turkish Ottomans, Germans, and Russians into war. It had nothing at all to do with the rise of German power, the British desire to thwart that power, French fear and hatred of Germany, Russia’s desire for power and influence and their ethnosubracial pan-Slavism, no sir! It was dem dere empires dat done it, lordy yes!
At this point, the ethnonationalist riposte would be: Austria-Hungary! Empire! The Archduke! The Serbs! Empire caused the war!
Does anyone really believe that the underlying cause of WWI was the assassination of some useless aristocratic parasite? No – the great powers of Europe, which did NOT include the “sick men” of Austria-Hungary and the Ottomans – were primed for war, wanted war – because of their selfish, petty nationalist (or subracial-ethnic-cultural-petty nationalist in the case of Russia) interests. The young Europeans who cheered for war and volunteered in droves in 1914 did not do so because of “empire” or because of “the Archduke.” They did so out of national pride and because of a petty nationalist animus toward their fellow Europeans.
Therefore, the assassination was merely an excuse. The Austrian tail did not wag the German dog; the Serbian tail did not wag the Russian dog, and the British and French didn’t care one whit about “national determination” (they were “empires,” no?). It was all an excuse for a petty nationalist war that was not caused by empires but that ultimately caused the end of those empires.
And, oh, yes, WWII occurred “because the ethnic boundaries were not properly drawn after WWI.” Right? Very good. By that logic, Greg, your Saint Adolf should have stopped after uniting with Austria and getting the German part of Czechoslovakia. Or are you going to tell us the invasion of Poland was really about the “Polish corridor?” Yeah…and I have a bridge to sell you connecting Manhattan and Brooklyn. Hitler had his lebensraum aims that were completely ethnonationalist, or at least Germanic/Nordicist. Hitler wanted land from the Slavs and wanted revenge against the French. There was also an honest fear and loathing of Soviet communism – although that didn’t stop the Nazi-Soviet pact to destroy Poland. The British were playing their usual game of preventing a continental power from emerging, and, again, the French feared and hated the Germans. And it was the petty nationalism of the British and French that prevented a pan-European alliance with Germany and Italy to destroy Soviet communism. The USSR had its own agenda, both of power politics and Marxist expansionism. Tell me – where in all of this was the war being caused by pan-European ideals? By multi-national states? And the only real link to “empire” here was the German (and Italian and Japanese) national desire for empire. And did Great Britain fight the war “to save the empire?” Hardly. Hitler was willing to guarantee the existence of the British Empire, which he admired. The British just wanted to destroy Hitler and Nazi Germany. The same old “grand strategy” of Great Britain – which lost them their empire and resulted in the homeland being reverse colonized by the Third World. Ethnonationalism! Snug in your hobbit hole!
The facts – the clear historical facts – demonstrate that petty nationalism, ethnonationalism, caused both World Wars and wrecked the White World, and to argue otherwise, and to try and shift the blame to the opponents of petty nationalism, is an even greater act of outrageously despicable dishonesty than the previous Gaslighting Greg act of blaming the failure of WN 2.0 on those who eschewed and opposed WN 2.0.
I have no idea what happened to this guy Johnson; I think his hatred of Richard Spencer has unhinged his mind.
A commentator responds to Johnson:
Now, while I strongly believe in the practical value of ethnic homogeneity this is not always feasible. Also a myriad of small but homogeneous states without a certain supra-national structure will render them indefensible against the Asian Empires – Russia and China! And these two do know how to genocide. So again, an effete bureaucrat of EU Commission is a better choice (and probably the only one acceptable currently) in order to maintain the peace between not perfectly homogeneous states but also to prevent the Asian Empires expansion in Europe.This structure was working in a certain degree until Angela Merkel blown it up by opening unilaterally the borders of Germany.My hope is for a Union of all white peoples (Europe, US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and South Africa and a proper part of South America) each people living in its own state based on its historical right (defined genetically and culturally), but organized in a supra national white states entity; expulsion of all non-European populations and individuals, including the mixed race individuals. Common defense, common positions regarding the rest of the world. Free internal markets. Free circulation of ideas and goods. Limited people circulation.
That’s OK as far as it goes, but he should have critiqued Johnson’s initial premises. For an ethnonationalist to blame WWI and WWII on “empires” and “multi-national states” is chutzpah of an order to make Dershowitz proud. It’s disgusting.
Then we have the vile hypocrite Roissy, who laments this story, while he has previously bragged about one of his girlfriends offering “do you want to put it in my ass?” I guess the blowback from the unbridled nihilistic sexual hedonism the gamesters preach is not always to their liking. Then we have the hypocrisy of “game” advocates always throwing their “Christianity” in our face, as if their lifestyle is in any way even remotely compatible with even the most modern dilution of authentic Christian belief. I can honestly say that in my entire life I have never met even one genuine Christian; as Nietzsche wrote – there was only one Christian and he died on the cross.
“Based” Tulsi. Gee…the Woman on Green Pepe Syndrome hit a snag real fast, eh?
Wrong, wrong, they’re always wrong.
Leftist lies on race, this from The NY Times, a racist media outlet who hired White-hating genocidal Asian bigot (or, more simply – “Asian”) Sarah Jeong:
People who live in a place today often bear no genetic resemblance to people who lived there thousands of years ago, so the idea that something in your blood makes you meaningfully Spanish is absurd.
Hmm… is that why Otzi the Iceman is genetically most similar to modern Europeans? Is that why ancient DNA analyses typically puts those samples closest to their modern day counterparts than to, say, people halfway across the globe? How about a bet? I’d say that the genomes of ancient Britons are genetically more similar to the modern English than they are to, say, Nigerians. If I’m wrong, I’ll admit it right here. If I’m right, the author of the NY Times piece will agree to resign his position and get a swastika tattooed on his forehead. Fair bet?