Category: Taylor

This is What a Monopoly Looks Like

Saturday Movement Roundup.  In all cases, emphasis added.

There are various forms of rent-seeking behavior that revolve around suppressing competition, such as raising barriers to entry, monopolization, etc.  These tactics of course lead to inefficiency, stagnation, and eventual ineffectiveness, as accountability for poor performance is removed from the equation, and as the adaptive process of selection is thwarted and failure is institutionalized.  Thus – the “movement” “leadership.”

Greg Johnson of Counter-Currents unveils a bold new direction:

In May, I had dinner with several movement colleagues, and I asked how I could improve Counter-Currents’ reach and effectiveness. Everyone at the table told me to invest more time in our YouTube channel, CounterCurrentsTV, because it has the most potential to amplify out message and reach new audiences. They were quite emphatic, actually, and the whole discussion took on the air of an intervention. I was convinced, though, and began planning to take Counter-Currents in a new direction.

That’s the ticket!  Refocus Counter-Currents in the direction of YouTube, and similar social media platforms!  What could go wrong with that?  Well, readers likely know that Johnson’s grand announcement was not only made right after Alex Jones was censored from YouTube, but after yet another example of Jared Taylor – who is significantly less radical than Counter-Currents – being censored as well.  This is all a continuation of the censorship and deplatforming of Taylor and other so-called “Far-Right” figures.  If and when Counter-Currents’ YouTube presence becomes more popular and influential, why wouldn’t the plug will be pulled on that as well?

The grand solution to that problem?

Greg Johnson

Posted August 11, 2018 at 12:39 am | Permalink

Then we move somewhere else.

Where?  If there is a safer place available now, why not use it?  If it is because such a place is virtually unknown compared to YouTube, then being kicked off YouTube is functionally equivalent to being deplatformed and censored.

To declare an intention to focus on a strategy that has already failed is daylight madness. It’s at the level of parody.  Then, in response to the obvious objection brought up by Counter-Currents readers, the answer essentially is: “if our obviously flawed strategy eventually – and inevitably – fails, we’ll think of something else.”  If I had accused Counter-Currents of planning a YouTube-public exposure-based strategy I would be accused of being an “unfair bitter blackpiller.”  But that’s what it is.

Likewise, after the fiasco of the Unite the Right and its aftermath – violence, death, doxing, lawsuits, hate crimes indictment, collapse of the “Alt Right brand,” people dropping out of the “movement,” Jeff Sessions supporting Antifa, etc. – if I were to sarcastically joke that “Der Movement is probably going to plan Unite the Right II,” I would also be accused of being “crazy and bitter” with “nothing to contribute.”  But, alas, the joke’s on you, dear reader, since Unite the Right II is a reality, not a Sallis parody (hard to tell the difference these days).

Once again: ultimately, I blame the “movement” rank-and-file for this. They enable it.  They support it.  They can end it, but choose not to.

And what about those “movement colleagues” of Johnson whose “intervention” consisted of “put videos on a forum from which you are almost certainly going to be tossed off from?”  The blind leading the blind.

I know that one riposte from the fundamentally dishonest “movement” will be “the crazy and bitter ‘blackpilling’ Sallis is always complaining, but never offers solutions.”  Long time readers of this blog know that this is a shameless lie, but for newer readers, I’ll just point out five – of many – instances in which I have outlined, in greater or lesser detail, things that I believe need to be done:

Agree or disagree, but do not pretend such input was never given.  The problem is that so-called “metapolitics” is not enough.  If not backed up and supported by community, infrastructure, and, above all, “friends in high places,” your metapolitical agitation can be suppressed when it becomes too successful.  There’s a reason why the deplatforming is occurring now: Trump’s victory, the Alt Right getting too “uppity,” the fear that too many Whites are being exposed to too many “hateful” ideas.  Politics is required in addition to metapolitics – you need people in positions of influence who, if not explicitly on your side, will at least “provide cover” for you on the pretext of “protecting free speech” or some other rationale.  Over time, if you are successful with such implicit protection, it can become more explicit later on (of course, if explicit support can be given early in the game, so much the better).  In turn, the metapolitical activism can assist the political, which in turn provides ever more explicit protection for the metapolitical – a positive, self-reinforcing “feed forward” mechanism.

And as to why these supportive infrastructures are not already in place – blame the previous generation of quota queens.  The preeminence of Pierce in the American “movement” was a disaster, because his viewpoint was that reflected in his Turner Diaries, and actualized in abortive form by Mathews and company – revolutionary cells “acting out” with violence for a Der Tag scenario.  The idea of a slow “march through the System,” of infiltration, of patience, of a multi-tier approach including electoral politics, all this was rejected because “the System will collapse in the next five years” – a prediction repeated for at least for the last 50 years or so.

Next: It appears that the EGI Notes tin cup paradigm is somehow filtering out to the “movement” – in this podcast, when soliciting donations, Taylor mentions that he does not want to appear to be “rattling the tin cup.”

I find it hard to believe that any of the “movement” leadership reads this humble blog, particularly since acceptance of criticism is not a strong point; this may just be an amusing coincidence, or perhaps some third party mentioned that criticism of tin cupism takes place here.

My view on this issue is clear: I have no problem whatsoever with full time activists living off donations IF such activists are earning their “salary.”  If they do important things to advance the cause – things that “amateurs” cannot do for “free” – then certainly they should and must be supported by the rank-and-file.

I for one would like to see Salter get supported; writing books like On Genetic Interests is a full time job and support for possible future works of that nature would be money well donated.

On the other hand, I’ve criticized VDARE because, according to past tax records published by the media and discussed here, they’ve been absorbing a very large fraction of “movement” donations, and for what?  Running a blog?  

As regards the podcast itself, apparently, Taylor believed the NY Times would dump Jeong once its (not “her”*) comments came to light.  Taylor has been at this several years longer than I have – doesn’t he know by now that Jeong’s comments were a reason to hire, not fire, it?  Hatred of Whites is the bedrock foundation of the System, and isn’t the NY Times – classified at this blog as an overt hate organization – a leading mouthpiece of that same System?  The NY Times is likely to hire Eric Clanton for their editorial board.  If not them, someone else will give him a mouthpiece. I mean, if he had actually killed someone, he would be more marketable, but still, assault and battery is sufficient for his System bonafides.

In summary: the quota queens and their “movement” use their affirmative action policy to restrict entry to leadership positions, forming a monopoly for the Pierces, Spencers, Johnsons, Taylors, and Kesslers – leading to inefficiency, error, stagnation, endlessly repeated mistakes, and tragically lost opportunities.

*Looking at the various photographs of Jeong accompanying the articles about it, it is not clear to me how the physical appearance differs from that of, say, a 12-year old male Korean.  Secondary sexual characteristics are not, at least to me, readily apparent.  Therefore, in the absence of a karyotype demonstrating two X chromosomes, the word “it” seems a more prudent descriptor of that anti-White racist fanatic.

Related gamester comment:

Space Viking

Not sure how you can tell the difference between the g00k and -ette either. Very low sexual dimorphism.

Advertisements

Monday’s Movement Madness

In all cases, emphasis added.

Meet the Alt Right, meet Der Movement:

“If anyone should have racial pride, it is Europeans, the more northern and western the more so.”

Sallis: right again and again and again.  Particularly, with respect to the point that Der Movement Inc. has nothing – absolutely nothing – to offer so-called “White ethnics.”  If anything, given its HBD factions, it is more pro-Jewish and pro-Asian than in any way compatible to White ethnics.

Roissy, 8/5/2018:

Comment Of The Week: Anti-Trump Hatred Is Anti-White Hatred

…is that they’re not infuriated at HIM. They’re infuriated at US.

The entire media and government complex essentially ORDERED White Americans not to vote for Trump. White America disobeyed them and elected him anyway, with wildly enthusiastic crowds obliquely expressing a desire for racial/ethnic survival with chants of “build the Wall,” etc.

At this point, it doesn’t matter what Trump does from the viewpoint of the (((tribe))). He could give every jew in the US $1 billion and they’d still hate him, because they don’t really care about him. He is the symbol of our defiance to them, however rudimentary and quasi-subconscious it is in many cases. It’s that defiance which infuriates them — and terrifies them, which infuriates them even more.

Hence why International Shtetl organs like the NYBetaTimes are beginning to slip up and allow their unchecked fury at Trump (read: at White Christian America) to betray them, recently evident in their mishandling of the Sarah Jeong debacle. It’s harder to properly strategize and subvert a nation when you’re driven by fear and loathing to a pitched hysteria. Their desperation to maintain control of the horizontal and the vertical is making them sloppy. Anti-White Noise is leaking through the screen.

Ironsides is right. Anti-White hatred is channeled through Trump, which explains why the rage against Trump is so unhinged; (((they))) and their shitlib Gentile useful idiots who never met a phony virtue they didn’t want to signal correctly perceive in the phenomenon of Trump a resurrecting White consciousness and awareness of the malice that is directed against them.

Sound familiar?  That is what I’ve been saying here at EGI Notes for several years, most recently on June 29, 2018;

Thus, based on these perceptions, I have argued that hatred of Trump (and his staff) is a proxy for hatred for Whites; thus, all the sweaty, hateful fetishes and fantasies these people (including White leftists) harbor toward Whites comes out in their unhinged demented fury at the leftist Trump and his SJW staff.  Perceptions, it is all perceptions.

Therefore, given the genocidal animus these folks have for Whites, is it no wonder they pose with mockups of a decapitated Trump head or say “Fuck Trump” at a media-covered celebrity event or shoot up a GOP congressional baseball practice or attack Trump supporters (with Sessions providing legal cover) or harass Trump staff wherever and whenever they show themselves in public?

You see, to these people, including Homo erectus Maxine, Whites have been getting too uppity recently.  They are not quietly and humbly accepting the steady march toward White dispossession.  The perception of Trump has thrown a monkey (no pun intended) wrench into the multicultural apparatus and the Guks and their White traitor allies are enraged at the temerity of these Whites. Why doesn’t the lowly White Man know his place?  Sit down and shut up, Whitey!

That explains much I think.

Once again: the quota queens eventually end up repeating Sallisian memes – weeks, months, or even years later.  It’s a form of plagiarism, really.

From MPC:

Lol at the alt-right viciously harrassing a young asian woman. 

With what? Marriage proposals and paypig offerings?

Good to see that some people are noticing what Sallis has been talking about – the Yellow Fever of the Alt Right.

Podcast representing the bulk of the financial support going into activist coffers. Taylor is painfully naïve concerning the judicial system.  What is going to happen to Fields and to Spencer’s lawsuit is anyone’s guess, but my guess is that I’m real skeptical it is going to turn out well.  Comparing Fields to Zimmerman fails at many levels; regardless of the “White Hispanic” nonsense of the controlled media, the reality to the jurors was of a Hispanic defending himself from a violent Negro (to eliminate redundancy: a Negro) attacking him.  Fields, regardless of the circumstances, is viewed as a White Nutzi and that alone, even ignoring his actions, is sufficient for a typical jury to convict him of virtually anything.  One wonders how aggressively his “counsel” is going to defend him, as well.  As regards the civil suit against Beavis and Butthead – that’s so absurd it should have been immediately thrown out of court.  That is wasn’t tells you much about “judicial fairness and integrity.”

On all the other issues discussed though, Taylor made more sense than Brimelow, which is of course not at all surprising.  By the way, Pete, “Razib” is not an Indian, but a Bengali, and he does not write “ably” on genetics or anything else.  He’s the idiot who once confused homologous chromosomes and sister chromatids.

Prior generations of White leaders betrayed us, and the levers of power and money in the West are no longer in our hands. We must choose a strategy carefully, as we most likely will not have a second chance.

Agreed. That’s why the decades of wasted opportunities – in part due to Pierce and the National Alliance – has been so devastating.  And why the affirmative action policy has to end.

We must awaken a new generation of our people. We must inspire the superior minds among them. We cannot do that by reviving the distant past of our race, no matter how much we can and do honor it. 

We also cannot do that by reviving the recent past, either, whether that includes the general problem of fossilized “movement” dogma, or the specific issue of trying to revive the National Alliance, which effectively died with Pierce.

We cannot do that by ignoring the exponential increase in human knowledge that has been brought about in the last century — knowledge of the genetic structure that makes us what we are, and knowledge of the structure of reality itself.

That knowledge invalidates a significant portion of “movement” dogma, including the HBD fraud (hello, Rushton).

None of the strategies I have enumerated so far seems likely to revolutionize the moral thinking of the superior fraction of our population — the fraction that can actually get things done and change this filthy excuse for a society into something great and noble again.

None of the “movement” strategies of the last 50 years, including those extant today are likely to do so either.

But there is another choice.

Yes, dump the quota queens and actualize meritocracy within racial activism.  Dump the dogma and try something new.

The authors are clear that this could never have developed if females’ estrus was clear for all see and if human females, like female swans, were evolved to be monogamous. But this is the crucial point. Human females are not evolved to be monogamous. They’re evolved to be, albeit cunningly, “polyandrous”: marry the kindly Beta male if you must but get pregnant by the Alpha one.

Grant and Montrose argued that patriarchy is, therefore, entirely understandable in evolutionary terms…

Not surprisingly, the attitude of VDARE toward Antifa Jeff is different than that of EGI Notes.  We both agree that his behavior is “amazing” though.

Genetic Basis for Health Disparities

More “hate facts.”

Read this.  Author summary is below (emphasis added). The “received wisdom” from the Left is that all human populations are genetically identical, there is no such thing as race, and that racial health disparities are due to “White racism.”  Science says different.

Individuals of European and African ancestry have different susceptibility for developing specific infections and diseases. Part of this difference in immune response is thought to arise from genetic differences accumulated over the millennia that conferred advantages in fighting different infectious pathogens endemic to different parts of the world. The impact of these immune differences and how they are influenced by modern lifestyles and living environments remains to be understood. Findings from this study revealed population differences in the levels of circulating cytokines, i.e. chemical messengers of the immune system, which were due in part to different demographic and lifestyle factors. Further, a change in the gene encoding for the Duffy antigen receptor protein, identified as rs2814778 and known as the Duffy-null allele, was the most important factor explaining low circulating levels of CCL2 and CCL11, key chemokines regulating the migration of white blood cells, specifically monocytes and eosinophils, which play a role in inflammation. This genetic variant occurs almost exclusively among Africans, likely because of its role in protecting against malaria infection, and results in loss of Duffy antigen protein on red blood cells. The substantial immune differences by ancestry may have broad implications for health disparities.

Race denial is the biggest scientific fraud of the last half-century.  Unfortunately, HBD is also politicized pseudoscience (one can imagine the anguish of the race realists if genetic analysis confirms negative stereotypes of Jews and East Asians – well, we don’t really have to imagine anything; consider how the Alt Wrong has studiously ignored studies, including those by Jewish scientists, showing Jews as genetically distinct from Europeans).  What we need is a real racial science – neither race denial nor Jew/Oriental worship.

Amren 2018

Some comments.

Over 250 people gathered at the beautiful inn at Montgomery Bell State Park to hear from an exciting group of speakers. Though antifa promised to “smash” the conference, police and park rangers had clearly learned from the mistakes of Charlottesville. Courteous and professional officers kept antifa well away from us, and there were no confrontations. Anyone who stayed inside the conference center could barely even see, let alone hear, the 30 or so protesters. Police and park rangers set objective rules to allow both our guests and our opponents to exercise their First Amendment rights in the best traditions of our country. We are deeply grateful to the state of Tennessee for protecting the conference while enabling protesters to express themselves peacefully.

The police didn’t strictly enforce the anti-mask law in all cases, but, all in all, they did a credible job.  At some point though, the Right needs to protect their own conferences.

There were foreign press and two documentary crews at the conference, but we kept out dishonest, flagrantly hostile media. Both Huffington Post and Vice wanted to cover the conference, but they can be counted on to slant their coverage to the point that the event would be unrecognizable, and—even worse—they have doxed people. Audience security comes first.

I’ll give Amren credit for being wiser than others on the Right in this regard.  Apparently, some standards (other than: are you a Swedish homosexual?  Are you an embedded Norwegian journalist?) were applied.

This conference showed a striking unity of theme throughout the weekend, as speaker after speaker emphasized the need to learn from mistakes…

Apparently, there will be many opportunities for learning.

Unfortunately, the reaction may not be quick enough, and whites could suffer the fate of the American Indians or the Australian Aborigines. “If you don’t or can’t stand up for your interests, very, very bad things happen to you,” warned Mr. Davies. “That is the nature of human society and human history.”

The “White Man’s Disease” in a nutshell: the unwillingness or inability to defend and promote your own group interests.

Mr. Davies therefore argued that white advocates must think very seriously about how they present themselves. He acknowledged that in the “soft totalitarianism” in the West, there is no way to be involved in this cause without sacrifice. Like dissidents in Eastern Europe, we must accept the fact that many sympathizers are too intimidated to come forward, and white advocates must think very hard about whom to attract. “We need to inspire and win over the best people in our societies,” said Mr. Davies, “and we are not going to do that by behaving in a fashion that attracts only the mob.”

You mean like Charlottesville Ragnarok?

Mr. Davies warned against the “Marxist fallacy” that history will break our way without anyone taking action or making sacrifices. We must also not make excuses for flawed leaders simply because they have thrust themselves forward. 

Yes. Mr. Davies, meet Der Movement, Inc.  Meet many of the people at the very conference at which you made this excellent comment.

He expressed amazement that white advocates seem to hold leaders to lower standards than those they set for themselves.

So, if Davies says that, he’s wise; if Sallis says that, he’s “crazy and bitter.”  Affirmative action once again.  Want better leaders?  Ditch the official Der Movement Ethnic Affirmative Action Program.  But, I have to say, given the people – the “leaders” – speaking at this conference, Davies’ comments either reflect sarcastic irony or a stunning sense of self-awareness.  Some of the biggest failures of leadership shared the podium with him.

Mrs. Brimelow noted that both American Renaissance and VDARE.com have a proven record of accomplishment.

At what? Panhandling?

As regards Derbyshire, check out the comments thread for a debate about his presence at the meeting, as a speaker no less, and the misguided idiots defending this grotesque monstrosity.

One of my sanctimonious critics in Der Movement (someone who, by the way, has also sharply criticized Derbyshire and Derbyshire’s supporters yet spoke at this conference along with Derbyshire) labeled me a “low information moralizer” because I had the temerity to suggest that it would be good for the “movement” if he ended his childish feud with Richard Spencer.  But if we want to see some real low information moralizers, check out the fools defending Derbyshire in the comments thread.  Apparently, they believe the only issue is Derbyshire’s Chinese wife and half-Asian children.  Perhaps if they had ever bothered reading this blog, they could have made the jump to being high information moralizers. Let me help.  

First, Derbyshire not only engages in miscegenation, but he is a fervent supporter and promoter of the practice, vehemently debated Taylor in favor of it, and threatened violence against anti-miscegenation individuals who emailed him about it (i.e., “come over to my house and I’ll greet you in an appropriate manner,” or something to that effect – all at VDARE).  The pro-Jewish Derbyshire wrote an offensive “hit piece” against Kevin MacDonald, labelling MacDonald “the Marx of the anti-Semites” and that certainly did not help MacDonald, who at that time still had an ongoing academic career and was subject to intense pressure over his views.  Derbyshire did not take a “financial hit” because of defending pro-White positions – he was let go from National Review because of a self-serving essay he wrote warning his half-Asian children to beware of Blacks; I label that essay self-serving because it was part of his ongoing attempts to normalize his family to White conservatives, dividing Americans between “Black vs. non-Black” instead of “White vs. non-White,” and that his mixed children will be considered “White” by Blacks.  Derbyshire was then welcomed with open arms by Der Movement (he’s English after all), and has been invited to speak at Amren conferences, despite previously attacking Amren conference attendees (you know, the cucks who now applaud him) by agreeing to their characterization as “latrine flies.”  Derbyshire consistently labels “racial purists” as “nuts” and is not a pro-White activist but a HBD race realist/cognitive elitist.  And I won’t even get into his atrocious comments about child porn.  In my opinion, Derbyshire is a despicable excuse for a human being, it is hard for me to think of anyone in any way associated with the “movement” that I loathe more, and I have zero respect for any of his supporters and enablers, anyone who invites him to be a speaker at meetings, anyone who has him as a writer and/or podcaster for their sites, or anyone who shares a podium with him at a conference.

Several years ago, Johnson came out against Amren meetings and the time and money spent on them; now he attends and this year was actually a featured speaker.  Not wanting to be a “low information moralizer” I won’t speculate as to why Johnson gets to speak and not Spencer, whether the lack of Spencerism was a lack of interest from the Amren side, or from Spencer himself (or both).  I will note that Amren’s attacks against Spencer for “Hailgate” and alleged anti-Jewish attitudes is curious since Counter-Currents is no friend of the Jews, features positive articles on Hitler, and Johnson has been quoted as making “anti-Semitic” comments himself (“Jews have to leave America,” etc.).

As far as Dickson goes, after reading his interview, to me he’s just another “movement” apparatchik. A dime a dozen.

Der Movement, Der Movement, Der Movement marches on.

Some Enlightening Interviews

Der Movement, Der Movement, Der Movement marches on.

I think the Alt-Right may be on its way out. It seems deeply divided within its own ranks and in trying to assert itself it used shock tactics that have backfired. Another one of its multiple problems has been its largely futile attempt to substitute shocking interviews and dramatic demonstrations for the work of gathering resources.

I also worked with Wilmot Robertson in support of Instauration.

Wilmot Robertson is the noblest person I have met in this cause.

Careful there, Sam, careful, hordes of greasy, five foot tall, hysterically Catholic, superstitious olive-skinned Afrowops will be swarming all over like roaches!  Have no fear though.  “Wilmot” will scare them off by brandishing a magic rune, analogous to a vampires and a cross.

The presenter was a young fellow a few years younger than I was…Politically, he came from the Left. He had had ties to the SDS and had cut sugar cane in Cuba in support of Fidel Castro.

This youngster’s name was Jared Taylor.

The rest is history, indeed.

In Der News

Odds and ends in der news.

Some old news, but still relevant.

The USA continues to follow the insane directives, promoted especially by the Obama administration, to continue to decrease yields of US nuclear weapons.  Last I read, they wanted to get rid of all the low megaton range B83s – which themselves can’t destroy deep targets – and replace them with low yield “dial-a-yield” weapons.  I have nothing against the “dial-a-yield” concept, as long as megaton range yields are included in the spectrum, which was NOT the case for the leftist Obama-pansy military planning.  Meanwhile, Russia continues to have high-yield weapons, and with improving accuracy.  They’ll be able to take out fortified targets, while US bombs would be hard-pressed to mimic Hiroshima.  Another example of Western weakness and degeneracy – but let’s put ‘Western” in scare quotes.

“Even nuclear weapons have limited effectiveness at destroying the deepest or widely separated underground bunkers,” reads a 2005 report from the Union of Concerned Scientists. “For example, an earth penetrating weapon using the 1.2 megaton B83 warhead—the highest yield weapon in the U.S. nuclear stockpile—could crush underground bunkers to a depth of about 1000 feet. Deeper bunkers can be constructed with modern tunneling equipment, and are essentially invulnerable to nuclear attack.”

Pan-Europeanists = early Rome.
Ethnonationalists – Greek city states. Didn’t Stoddard compare WWI with the Peloponnesian War?
Excerpt of comment from AltRight.com:

I prefer Spencer’s speeches to Jared Taylor citing stats about how Jews and Asians are smarter than Huwhites.

Happy Saint Adolf Day 2018

SLC News.

“World Brotherhood of Europeans” – excluding Afrowops and Romanohorians of course.

Did you ever notice that:

***When Americans fight wars that benefit Jews (e.g., WWII, any of the Middle Eastern wars that benefit Israel), then veterans are good and noble, and popular culture fetishizes veteran worship; however, when Americans fight wars that Jews disapprove of (e.g., Vietnam or even the entire “Cold War” military endeavor), then veterans are despicable “baby killers” to be scorned, while anti-war protesters and draft dodgers are lionized.  Funny, that.  It’s almost as if the entire American culture is modulated to reflect Jewish concerns and Jewish views. 

***In a typical modern American classroom, half the students have attention deficit disorder and the other half have a peanut allergy.  And most are overweight.

More SLC News:

The Alt Right’s “generational warfare” is ludicrous from my perspective for many reasons, foremost among them is that virtually every White Millennial I have known (many in fact) is not only an extreme leftist, but they all are hysterically ultra-SJW extreme leftists, oozing with the most virulent anti-White attitudes imaginable.  Boomers may be cucked cowards, but many (most?) Millennials are open enemies.

Read this.

The roots of what we now call the Alt-Right lay in the Ron Paul movement.

And that is why the Alt Right is doomed to fail.  It was tainted by libertardism from the very beginning.

Read this, emphasis added (from the original book):

….the degree of genetic differentiation among Indian jati groups living side by side in the same village is typically two to three times higher than the genetic differentiation between northern and southern Europeans.

Let’s unpack that for a moment.  Typically, population genetics tells us that the greatest genetic differentiation in Europe is along the north/south axis, being a bit larger than east/west; the first axis in PCA is north/south, the second is east/west.  However, that differentiation, the north/south, in Europe is two to three times smaller than that between Indian brownster “micro-castes” who live “side by side in the same village.”  

Chuck the gamester pussy pedestalizer.