Category: Taylor

Saturday Movement Madness

The usual.

Jared Taylor and Paul Kersey explore the ominous implications of the Trump DOJ’s arrest of pro-white activists based largely on leftist investigations.

Time for Roissy to post about Trumpian handshakes…oh wait, he’s done it. After all, tweets, negs, and handshakes form the cornerstone of what a real “MAGA” President is all about.

This is an excellent Taylor video.  I’ll say it again- Taylor should run for elected office. Despite whatever ideological disagreements I have with Amren, I’d wholeheartedly support a Taylor candidacy.  There’s no one in the “movement” today better suited.  

I have one fundamental criticism to make – that is apart from the while Jew/Asian/HBD thing.  Amren, particularly Taylor, is very descriptive, and not at all  prescriptive.  Yes, there are some, very few,  lukewarm exceptions – Hood telling us we need to develop “White Identity” and so forth, but nothing concrete, nothing substantial.  Perhaps it is to preserve their non-for-profit status, maybe it is just that they believe their role is merely that of information dissemination.  However, it becomes tiresome after a time to hear all the horror stories, all the problems, with no solutions offered, no strategies proposed, no path forward outlined.  Ultimately, what do they see as the endgame?  Do Whites vote themselves out of this mess?  Do we need metapolitical/sociopolitical organization – neofascism?  Violent revolution?  Or do we just “ride the tiger” and discuss “race realism” while the ship of White civilization is capsized under the rising tide of color?  What do we do?

Yes, Pat, we are all deplorables now.  So, when are you going to come out in support of White nationalism?  Or are you afraid of being indicted for “hate crimes” by the far-left Bolshevik Antifa Jeff Sessions?  It’s a legitimate concern, I agree.

This is a decent Johnson essay, but he comes close to “movement” blasphemy at two points.

The Jewish connection throws a lot of light on the neuroticism and subjectivism Lilla laments. It also accounts for the preachy moralizing Lilla bemoans. Yes, a lot of political correctness seems to have New England Puritanism in its DNA, but who were the Puritans if not a “Judaizing” sect of Christianity? 

Criticizing the Puritans? KMacD got in some trouble with “movement” factions several years ago for doing just that.  Careful, careful

What does citizenship mean when a Chinese can take a test, swear an oath, and then commit espionage against America for China?

And now the Chinese?  The HBDers and the Silkers storm off in a huff. After all, isn’t the HBD dream a Jewish-Asian-Puritan/Anglo alliance, with the former two groups on top and the latter on the bottom?  Isn’t the Silker dream one of Chinese girls with guns guarding the borders of the West?

No, Steve, it is not self-parody; women are actually insane.  They actually believe “cooking a difficult meal” is the equivalent of volunteering for war, jumping out of a plane, or getting involved in Charlottesville Ragnarok.

Advertisements

Square Pegs in Round Holes

Expired advice for Spencer; advice for Der Movement.

What the low-life Zman claims he would have advised Spencer back in 2016:

1) Make other people come to you. In the case of the media, make them abide by your terms. The alleged point of the alt-right was as a revolt against the orthodoxy. It should appear to exist entirely outside of the mass media.

Better yet, ignore the mainstream media completely.  Create your own.

2) Use scarcity to create mystery. Being too available makes a person uninteresting and easy to categorize. When the leader of something speaks, it needs to command attention. If you’re out all the time talking to the troops, you’re just another guy.

Fair enough.

3) Concentrate on building up what it means to be alt-right. A catchy label is easily corrupted/hijacked when it is not backed by a filled out definition. “This is who we are, this is what defines us and this is what we want.” That way, grifters can’t create their version of your brand.

The problem here is that the core Alt Right were/are grifters themselves.  There was never any ideology there, and you can’t “build up” what’s not there in the first place – you need a foundation before any “building up.”  The Alt Right started out as “everyone to the right of the Neocon GOP” – including the Paleocons, the Alt Lite, the Alt Wrong, and various factions of Der Movement.  Later, it became more of a jackass Millennial “youth culture” version of fossilized “movement” dogma – there’s no ideology when all you are is Beavis-and-Butthead sniggering in drunken podcasts and simply parroting imbecilic “movement” talking points.

All that said, successful mass movement always outgrow their first leaders. The reason is, the first guys need to be more brave than smart. Once they have some success, the movement needs leaders who are more smart than brave.

You are not going to get any “smart” leaders until you ditch the affirmative action program, and don’t hold your breath waiting for that to happen.  And don’t mistake foolhardy with “brave.”

My advice to Spencer would have been much simpler, and more in accord with what Regnery likely had in mind: electoral politics.  Spencer had the background, connections, education, physical appearance, and personality for electoral politics, either as a Trump era right-wing populist candidate himself, pushing in the explicitly pro-White direction, or at least as a spokesman for such candidates.  He’s just not cut out for “movement” leadership, nor is he a deep thinker or ideologue. That’s not an insult; everyone has strengths and weaknesses.  He could have been a player in an electoral campaign in bringing the racialist Far Right together with Trumpian populism. And, yes, there could have been sufficient support – from a White electorate ready for more “red meat” racial politics after 2016, from Regnery, and from all the money currently being wasted on the Happy Penguins of VDARE.

A basic problem in Der Movement, and I’ve written about this before, is that people take on positions and responsibilities for which they are ill-suited, and thus fail.  One reason they do this is because there isn’t a critical mass of qualified people to fill the required roles (and Der Movement is in large part responsible for that paucity, since they drive away such people), because “activists” are not objective enough about their own strengths and weaknesses and let ambition and ego blind them to reality, because they want tin cup donations, and because everyone wants to be a leader – all Chiefs, no Indians.

For example, Jared Taylor is another who would have been perfect for electoral politics.  Greg Johnson (but not other Counter Currents writers – who are currently a sorry lot) produces reasonably good intellectual and metapolitical content – and I say that as someone who vehemently disagrees with almost all of that content, but I acknowledge its quality (likewise, one can acknowledge Lincoln and Stalin as men of ability without agreeing with their actions) – but he’s not cut out to be a leader, an organizer, or a public persona. Strom at least understands that he’s not leadership material (even apart from his previous legal troubles) and has let Will Williams ostensibly lead the National Alliance (or whatever is left of it).  Of course, Strom seemingly doesn’t realize that the NA died with Pierce and that he’s currently affiliated with a zombie organization, but at least he doesn’t harbor delusions about his own role – which is one of being a propagandist, for which he is well suited (although I also disagree with much of what he produces, similar to the Johnson case). Brimelow’s strength is as an author – Alien Nation was a useful contribution – and he should be supporting his family through writing books, not editing a blog (that many do for free).  Or, he could set up a civic nationalist immigration restriction lobbying group, and attempt to get something done.  What he’s doing now is worse than a waste.

The same may apply to me, maybe I don’t know where I’m best suited; the difference is that guys like me are not ethnically suited for any significant role in Der Movement as it currently exists with its dogma.  So, in my case, the question is almost irrelevant.  In these other cases, it is not.

And, Zman?  Best suited to cleaning toilets in the Fuhrerbunker, or rinsing out “movement” tin cups (functionally the same thing).

Odds and Ends: 9/20/18

More blackpills.  In all cases, emphasis added.

An excellent video exposing Trump as a pathetic cuck weakling, exposing his soft underbelly (built up by eating all those Big Macs) to the Left.  Trump: a pitiful beta loser of the first magnitude.

But, alas, there is something predictably missing from the video: an admission of error.  Who was it who wrote that Trump was the “last chance for White America?”  Why can’t these guys – who are always wrong – ever admit to being wrong even one single time?

We know about their fixation on dairy, but the gamesters also promote eating beef and other red meat.

Wash it down with several gallons of (raw) milk!  Your colon and prostate will thank you!

Der Movement, Der Movement, Der Movement marches on.

Those damn subhuman Afrowops.

Speaking of Afrowops, we once again observe the utter predictability of Der Movement and its kneejerk ethnic fetishism in the comments thread of Roissy’s “The Salvini Salvation” post.  Which once again confirms (as if anything I write needs confirmation as it is 99.9999% always correct) that it is absolutely impossible for there to be any post concerning, say, Italy, without half the comments being about True Romance, moops, etc.  These are the same sorts who would vandalize the Bromstad Wikipedia page in a desperate attempt to dissociate his phenotype from his actual ancestry. The Chinese mother!  The Chinese mother!

You’d be hard pressed to decide which of the two looks more Asian.  

Speaking of Asians: Copy, copy, copy, steal, steal, steal.  They’ll report things like this, but still self-identify as “Yellow Supremacists” and claim that Asians are superior to Whites in almost every measure (after all, Lynn and Rushton said so).

Once again. HBD is a political movement whose endgame is the enslavement of Whites to Jews and Asians.

Speaking of HBD: Derbyshire, he of the “measured groveling” to his Chinese wife, gives up the term “pathological altruism” just because he is wrist-slapped by the anti-White triracial mongrel Jayman, who makes the retarded statement that a heritable phenotype found among a sizable feature of a population can’t be pathological because it is “feature.”  That coming from someone who pretends that Salterism is “false” – as if adaptive fitness is not adaptive (for Whites only of course). Note to mongrel: if a “feature” is harming the adaptive fitness of a population and can lead it to its extinction, then, yes, it is “pathological” – which is to say, extremely maladaptive in the current environment.

That’s your “leadership,” you ethnic fetishist Type I scum – the race-mixing Derbyshires of the world, who’ll self-police the language they use based on the authority of a racial abomination. 


By the way, any reasonable definition of “pathological” will include:

…being such to a degree that is extreme, excessive, or markedly abnormal

Altruism and universalism leading to self-extinction would seem to fit “extreme, excessive, or markedly abnormal.”  


Ironically enough, the acceptance of the likes of Jayman into a majority White society is exactly the sort of pathological altruism and universalism we are talking about here, and even more ironically (or comically), Derbyshire’s own lickspittle subservience to Jayman (never mind his own marriage) is also a perfect example of this pathology.

The sort of “writing” you losers who support VDARE are funding.  The “wins above replacement” of Joe Judge are no doubt relevant to all issues of interest to VDARE readers, right Steve?  Steverino is getting breezier with each passing day.


Hey, Steve, what kind of real estate did Joe Judge own?  What was Walter Johnson’s PISA score?  Golf score?  Inquiring minds want to know!


Even more to the point: how much are you paid to write this drivel?


Roissy:

In twenty or thirty years, if America is still around having made it through the Current Year Crisis relatively unscathed, un-converged historians will rightly regard Trump’s candidacy, and his Presidency, as one of, if not THE, most incredible, multigenerationally defining political cataclysms. Trump will go into the books a Great Man, and his tweets and debate quips will become catchphrases for a hundred years.

Therein lies the problem, Roissy the Retard, Trump’s only accomplishments are “his tweets and debate quips.”  Not exactly how a nation gets saved.  His utility is unintentional, creating chaos and balkanization.  I do thank him for that, his existence feeds instability.  True enough, “his tweets and debate quips” have contributed to that, but its more the leftist insanity that is feeding this chaotic spiral, not Trump’s centrist pro-Jewish Negrophilia.

It’s…”America’s Senator.”

Sadly, though, USA Higdon is so far the only Department of Justice prosecutorial official to aggressively pursue the widespread problem of alien voting in the United States. Especially significant is that Jeff Sessions has not ordered USA Alex Tse to pursue a similar program in San Francisco, which openly allows illegal and legal aliens to vote in local elections.
The City and County of San Francisco also openly assist illegal aliens to remain in the United States by issuing identification cards to illegal aliens. It is also illegal for anyone or any organization to assist an illegal alien to remain in the United States. But Sessions and his underling Alex Tse, don’t seem to care.
We have been told that Jeff Sessions is the only immigration hawk in the Trump Administration, but that is obviously not true. Sessions is doing nothing to prod the various United States Attorneys throughout the United States to aggressively prosecute illegal aliens, especially when so many illegal aliens have records held by the States that will identify them and their homes, such as driver’s licenses issued by the State of California to over 1 million illegal aliens.
USA Alex Tse could easily obtain a Grand Jury subpoena for San Francisco’s ID card and voting records to identify illegal aliens who have voted or who are living in the United States illegally and are aided by the City and County of San Francisco in violation of Title 8 United States Code Section 1324. Tse could as well for the State of California driver’s license records for illegal aliens. However, he hasn’t and Sessions hasn’t ordered him to do that for one good reason, Jeff Sessions is part of the problem.
Time for Jeff Sessions to do the honorable thing, and resign. He does not have the confidence of the President.

Roissy: “Sessions as Attorney General alone justifies the entire Trump administration.”

Wrong, wrong, wrong: they’re always wrong.

Racist AI:

A look at a new study that reveals how AI robots can independently develop prejudices like racism and sexism
Robots can develop prejudices like “racism and sexism” all on their own, a shocking new study has found.
Artificial intelligence experts performed thousands of simulations on robot brains, revealing how they split off into groups and treat “outsiders” differently.
Computer scientists and psychologists from Cardiff University and the USA’s MIT teamed up to test how robots identify each other.
But they also tested how they copy and learn behaviors from each other, too.
The study, published in Scientific Reports, showed that virtual simulated robots would shun others, forming their own groups.
{snip}
It found that robots would donate to each other within small groups, denying outsiders to improve their own takings
{snip}
“Our simulations show that prejudice is a powerful force of nature and through evolution, it can easily become incentivized in virtual populations, to the detriment of wider connectivity with others.”

And yet the HBD filth claim that “ethnocentrism could never have evolved.”  

TOO is back in form:

Chauncey Mcdermott says:
September 18, 2018 at 5:49 pm
‘as counterweight to modern scientific racialist thought’
So which side do you err on?
The Italian Fascists were notoriously tolerant of Jews. Evola to me always seemed to have a bit of the apologist about him.

charlie
charlie says:
September 19, 2018 at 12:32 pm
Because they were half negro

 Talking about you there, Greg Conte.  That’s your “movement.”  Was it all worth it?

More Odds and Ends

More “movement” stupidity.  In all cases, emphasis added.

Retarded Zman:

The point here is while those “constitutional principles” sound appealing to our modern ears, the people who actually lived them did not like them very much. Interestingly, the romantics for the 18th century politics have the same problem as fascist romantics, in that they never wonder why their ideal was a complete failure. The fascist ideal can sound pretty good, until you look at the actual results. 

Yes, the actual results.  Well, there was an alliance between “liberal democracy” and Marxism to crush Fascism, with the equivalent of three world empires – American, British, and Soviet – required to fight a bloody war to accomplish this.  With respect to internal affairs, Fascism was essentially a roaring success in both Germany and Italy.

I suppose you can assert that by its very nature, Fascism leads to war, bloodshed, and all the other world powers teaming up to destroy it (I see this is as ludicrous). .I suppose you can also assert that every political system is doomed to fail – right now, liberal democracy is leading to genocidal race replacement of founding, native populations, and other forms of government extant today lead to stagnation, failed societies that people flee from, or rehashing of other types of previous failures.  What else has been successful? What?  Monarchy?  Marxism?  What?

Fascism has been the only form of rightist politics that has fostered a feeling of self-sacrificial fanatical commitment on the part of its followers. What’s the alternative? “HBD race realism?”  A government exemplified by Derbyshire’s self-described “measured groveling” to “Rosie?”

What?  Answer please?

From a strict purist Anglo-Nordic perspective, Chile is not an especially white nation.

Rewritten for accuracy:

From a general European perspective, Chile is not an especially white nation.

When are Latinos going to stop trying to conflate their New World ancestries and attitudes with the parental Old World stocks?

Also see this.  If Amren focuses “exclusively on race” why the attacks against Italians and Romanians, if Jews – a non-European people – are “hands off?”

Watch this. Very well, makes sense.  What about White-Jewish differences in behavior?

Watch this.  That’s good.  But if true, then why be a Yellow Supremacist?  Let’s oppose HBD to prevent a Chinese takeover of America.

It is a perennial debate in White Nationalist circles whether we should seek alliances with non-white ethnonationalist groups. The trouble with these discussions is that they ignore the nature of alliances, which are generally temporary and made possible by emergencies, i.e., interruptions in the normal order of things. If circumstances arose in which White Nationalists and, say, the Nation of Islam have common concrete interests and can ally to achieve them, I have little doubt that such an alliance could take place. The same is true of any other non-white ethnic group, including Jews. But once the specific circumstances of the alliance have passed, the two groups would go back to normal, i.e., they would return to distrusting and despising one another.

But we should support strict ethnonationalism, with temporary alliances between European ethnic groups, punctuated by ethnic cleansing among them.  Got it.

Palahniuk’s vision of Caucasia is meant to be taken as a satire of White Nationalism by Leftist gatekeepers in publishing and the media. But it is really just a satire of a particular type of White Nationalism, namely the anti-intellectual, anti-cultural, anti-urban, anti-woman

Can’t have that.  Send your money so Alt Lite Youtube Yeastbags can buy “silly frilly things.”

anti-gay

We certainly can’t have that.

…anti-egalitarian tendency that basically reduces White Nationalism to raising white birthrates and the fetishization of “Tradition” (not all traditions are good fits for white people)…

What?  Blasphemy!  Evola!  Guenon! Savitri Devi!  The Men Who Can’t Tell Time! The Age of Tungsten!  Kali Yuga!  Yogi and Boo-Boo!

…and “hierarchy” (not all hierarchies are just) that issues in Renaissance Fair LARPing. Pretty much all these tendencies cluster around the “White Sharia” meme, so that I how I will designate it.

No, Greg, all these “tendencies” describe your entire “movement” – as a whole.

And here is the most self-unaware sentence in all of human history:

Objective merit and expertise are deemphasized, replaced by quacks who are practiced at flattering powerful morons.

That, dear reader, describes Der Movement and its entire affirmative action leadership.  Readers of this blog are well aware that that sentence summarizes the entirety of the “movement” dynamic.

Finally, a victory by the Alt Right.

Holding Whites Accountable

It didn’t “just happen.”

But here’s the problem with this complaint – which by the way I can 100% identify with, having lived through similar times myself (in that case, mostly with various types of Negroes and of mulatto Hispanics, rather than Mexicans) – how did this state of affairs come to pass?

That is not a rhetorical question, nor am I being facetious.  Let’s answer the question.  Whites have been – and continue to be – a majority of the American population, a majority of voters, and a majority of the population of places like Iowa.  Whites used to be a clear majority of the population of California.  Whites vote.  What happened?  Who elected the politicians who enabled this disaster to occur?  Who looked the other way for decades?  Who ignored the problem as long as it was in someone else’s backyard and not their own?  Who ignored the plight of urban Whites (particularly if those were “White ethnics”)?

All of this didn’t “just happen.”

Please study this video, and pay particular attention to the 40 seconds from 3:20-4:00 – McCain’s infamous “build the danged fence” campaign video, made when Amnesty John was facing some heat from his right on immigration.  I remember noting that video at the time, and thinking to myself: “the GOP voters of Arizona can’t be that stupid, can they?  I mean, it’s obvious – obvious – that McCain’s lying to them, and he’ll go back to shilling for amnesty, and against any enforcement, once elected.  I mean, he’s being playing that game for a long time; surely, they are wise to him now, right?  Indeed, the GOP as a whole does this, feinting right for elections, and then governing like liberal Democrats.”

Well, no, the GOP voters of Arizona were fooled once again, and even though they howled their betrayal, they still continued to support the evil scum McCain, and are crying bitter tears over his death.  

This has been the Republican playbook for decades.  They dog whistle implicitly on race – VERY implicitly – to gather White support for Necon agendas and for the same big business interests bringing in the hordes to begin with.  And the rubes fall for the scam time and again.

Here’s where I part company with Bowery and all the rest: Whites need to be held accountable for their stupidity, fecklessness, and painful naiveté.  

The key part of that man’s lament, from the short essay Bowery presented:

Am I racist? Jesus, am I becoming one of those guys. I sure sound like one of those guys.

“Those guys.”  You see, the only people who have a solution to the problem (let’s ignore for the moment that Der Movement, Inc. is a fraud; I’m referring to racial nationalism in general) are considered “those people,” as alien as the Latinos, freaks to be dismissed and despised.  This fellow sounds like he considers being one of “those people” just as bad – nay, even worse! – than what has happened to his town, his community, his nation.  “Jesus,” indeed.

One wonders who this fellow voted for.  McCain?  Romney?  Maybe even Obama?

Accountability?

Every time I read, or hear, a lament like this, every time some anti-White outrage occurs, every time the borders are opened even more, what I do – and what I suggest we all do – is trace things back to the beginning.  Why are these things allowed to happen?  Answer: Those in a position of leadership allow it to happen; in many cases, they support and promote it.  

Well, then, how and why are they in this position of power to begin with?  If elected, it is because an electorate that is majority White elected them (and the same applies overseas – who elected Merkel?).  If they are in a position  of power economically, it is because a consumer base that is majority White continues to purchase their goods and services; Whites being incapable of organizing boycotts on the basis of racial interests like any other group.  If the power derives from fame and celebrity, it is because a majority White population provides that fame and celebrity.

Oh, you will cry – “It’s the Jews!  The Jews!”   Trace that back.  Who let the Jews into America?  Who let the Jews rise to prominence and seize the media?  Who kowtows to Jewish interests?  Who serves as the Shabbos goy traitor class?  We’re back again to the White elites – the politicians elected by Whites, the moguls funded by White consumers, the celebrities whose fame derives from White fan worship.

The same applies if you want to scream about “moneyed interests” or “the managerial class” or “The Federal Reserve” or “the SJWs” or whatever pet peeve you have: these things didn’t “just happen.”  To paraphrase Pareto: if a wolf is eating you, it is because you chose to be a sheep.  If Whites choose to be a race of sheep, they should not be surprised about all the wolves gorging themselves on the white-flocked sheeple.

Trace things back to first principles.  Things do not “just happen.”  And screaming about “the Jews” is a crutch to avoid dealing with the need to hold Whites accountable for their own lowly position.

And I have to laugh at the Roissyite HBD Nordicist gamesters getting all hot and bothered about a single German (of course) rally – yes sir, “the Saxon begins to hate!”  How about “the Saxon” voting for even the milquetoast moderate right-wing Alternative For Germany (never mind the NPD), instead of putting Merkel in power over and over again?  Another example of Der Movement’s victory psychosis, and their Germans on White Horse Syndrome.

I suppose it’s another example of White fecklessness that they are “represented” by a “racial movement” composed of retards and fetishistic morons.

This is What a Monopoly Looks Like

Saturday Movement Roundup.  In all cases, emphasis added.

There are various forms of rent-seeking behavior that revolve around suppressing competition, such as raising barriers to entry, monopolization, etc.  These tactics of course lead to inefficiency, stagnation, and eventual ineffectiveness, as accountability for poor performance is removed from the equation, and as the adaptive process of selection is thwarted and failure is institutionalized.  Thus – the “movement” “leadership.”

Greg Johnson of Counter-Currents unveils a bold new direction:

In May, I had dinner with several movement colleagues, and I asked how I could improve Counter-Currents’ reach and effectiveness. Everyone at the table told me to invest more time in our YouTube channel, CounterCurrentsTV, because it has the most potential to amplify out message and reach new audiences. They were quite emphatic, actually, and the whole discussion took on the air of an intervention. I was convinced, though, and began planning to take Counter-Currents in a new direction.

That’s the ticket!  Refocus Counter-Currents in the direction of YouTube, and similar social media platforms!  What could go wrong with that?  Well, readers likely know that Johnson’s grand announcement was not only made right after Alex Jones was censored from YouTube, but after yet another example of Jared Taylor – who is significantly less radical than Counter-Currents – being censored as well.  This is all a continuation of the censorship and deplatforming of Taylor and other so-called “Far-Right” figures.  If and when Counter-Currents’ YouTube presence becomes more popular and influential, why wouldn’t the plug will be pulled on that as well?

The grand solution to that problem?

Greg Johnson

Posted August 11, 2018 at 12:39 am | Permalink

Then we move somewhere else.

Where?  If there is a safer place available now, why not use it?  If it is because such a place is virtually unknown compared to YouTube, then being kicked off YouTube is functionally equivalent to being deplatformed and censored.

To declare an intention to focus on a strategy that has already failed is daylight madness. It’s at the level of parody.  Then, in response to the obvious objection brought up by Counter-Currents readers, the answer essentially is: “if our obviously flawed strategy eventually – and inevitably – fails, we’ll think of something else.”  If I had accused Counter-Currents of planning a YouTube-public exposure-based strategy I would be accused of being an “unfair bitter blackpiller.”  But that’s what it is.

Likewise, after the fiasco of the Unite the Right and its aftermath – violence, death, doxing, lawsuits, hate crimes indictment, collapse of the “Alt Right brand,” people dropping out of the “movement,” Jeff Sessions supporting Antifa, etc. – if I were to sarcastically joke that “Der Movement is probably going to plan Unite the Right II,” I would also be accused of being “crazy and bitter” with “nothing to contribute.”  But, alas, the joke’s on you, dear reader, since Unite the Right II is a reality, not a Sallis parody (hard to tell the difference these days).

Once again: ultimately, I blame the “movement” rank-and-file for this. They enable it.  They support it.  They can end it, but choose not to.

And what about those “movement colleagues” of Johnson whose “intervention” consisted of “put videos on a forum from which you are almost certainly going to be tossed off from?”  The blind leading the blind.

I know that one riposte from the fundamentally dishonest “movement” will be “the crazy and bitter ‘blackpilling’ Sallis is always complaining, but never offers solutions.”  Long time readers of this blog know that this is a shameless lie, but for newer readers, I’ll just point out five – of many – instances in which I have outlined, in greater or lesser detail, things that I believe need to be done:

Agree or disagree, but do not pretend such input was never given.  The problem is that so-called “metapolitics” is not enough.  If not backed up and supported by community, infrastructure, and, above all, “friends in high places,” your metapolitical agitation can be suppressed when it becomes too successful.  There’s a reason why the deplatforming is occurring now: Trump’s victory, the Alt Right getting too “uppity,” the fear that too many Whites are being exposed to too many “hateful” ideas.  Politics is required in addition to metapolitics – you need people in positions of influence who, if not explicitly on your side, will at least “provide cover” for you on the pretext of “protecting free speech” or some other rationale.  Over time, if you are successful with such implicit protection, it can become more explicit later on (of course, if explicit support can be given early in the game, so much the better).  In turn, the metapolitical activism can assist the political, which in turn provides ever more explicit protection for the metapolitical – a positive, self-reinforcing “feed forward” mechanism.

And as to why these supportive infrastructures are not already in place – blame the previous generation of quota queens.  The preeminence of Pierce in the American “movement” was a disaster, because his viewpoint was that reflected in his Turner Diaries, and actualized in abortive form by Mathews and company – revolutionary cells “acting out” with violence for a Der Tag scenario.  The idea of a slow “march through the System,” of infiltration, of patience, of a multi-tier approach including electoral politics, all this was rejected because “the System will collapse in the next five years” – a prediction repeated for at least for the last 50 years or so.

Next: It appears that the EGI Notes tin cup paradigm is somehow filtering out to the “movement” – in this podcast, when soliciting donations, Taylor mentions that he does not want to appear to be “rattling the tin cup.”

I find it hard to believe that any of the “movement” leadership reads this humble blog, particularly since acceptance of criticism is not a strong point; this may just be an amusing coincidence, or perhaps some third party mentioned that criticism of tin cupism takes place here.

My view on this issue is clear: I have no problem whatsoever with full time activists living off donations IF such activists are earning their “salary.”  If they do important things to advance the cause – things that “amateurs” cannot do for “free” – then certainly they should and must be supported by the rank-and-file.

I for one would like to see Salter get supported; writing books like On Genetic Interests is a full time job and support for possible future works of that nature would be money well donated.

On the other hand, I’ve criticized VDARE because, according to past tax records published by the media and discussed here, they’ve been absorbing a very large fraction of “movement” donations, and for what?  Running a blog?  

As regards the podcast itself, apparently, Taylor believed the NY Times would dump Jeong once its (not “her”*) comments came to light.  Taylor has been at this several years longer than I have – doesn’t he know by now that Jeong’s comments were a reason to hire, not fire, it?  Hatred of Whites is the bedrock foundation of the System, and isn’t the NY Times – classified at this blog as an overt hate organization – a leading mouthpiece of that same System?  The NY Times is likely to hire Eric Clanton for their editorial board.  If not them, someone else will give him a mouthpiece. I mean, if he had actually killed someone, he would be more marketable, but still, assault and battery is sufficient for his System bonafides.

In summary: the quota queens and their “movement” use their affirmative action policy to restrict entry to leadership positions, forming a monopoly for the Pierces, Spencers, Johnsons, Taylors, and Kesslers – leading to inefficiency, error, stagnation, endlessly repeated mistakes, and tragically lost opportunities.

*Looking at the various photographs of Jeong accompanying the articles about it, it is not clear to me how the physical appearance differs from that of, say, a 12-year old male Korean.  Secondary sexual characteristics are not, at least to me, readily apparent.  Therefore, in the absence of a karyotype demonstrating two X chromosomes, the word “it” seems a more prudent descriptor of that anti-White racist fanatic.

Related gamester comment:

Space Viking

Not sure how you can tell the difference between the g00k and -ette either. Very low sexual dimorphism.

Monday’s Movement Madness

In all cases, emphasis added.

Meet the Alt Right, meet Der Movement:

“If anyone should have racial pride, it is Europeans, the more northern and western the more so.”

Sallis: right again and again and again.  Particularly, with respect to the point that Der Movement Inc. has nothing – absolutely nothing – to offer so-called “White ethnics.”  If anything, given its HBD factions, it is more pro-Jewish and pro-Asian than in any way compatible to White ethnics.

Roissy, 8/5/2018:

Comment Of The Week: Anti-Trump Hatred Is Anti-White Hatred

…is that they’re not infuriated at HIM. They’re infuriated at US.

The entire media and government complex essentially ORDERED White Americans not to vote for Trump. White America disobeyed them and elected him anyway, with wildly enthusiastic crowds obliquely expressing a desire for racial/ethnic survival with chants of “build the Wall,” etc.

At this point, it doesn’t matter what Trump does from the viewpoint of the (((tribe))). He could give every jew in the US $1 billion and they’d still hate him, because they don’t really care about him. He is the symbol of our defiance to them, however rudimentary and quasi-subconscious it is in many cases. It’s that defiance which infuriates them — and terrifies them, which infuriates them even more.

Hence why International Shtetl organs like the NYBetaTimes are beginning to slip up and allow their unchecked fury at Trump (read: at White Christian America) to betray them, recently evident in their mishandling of the Sarah Jeong debacle. It’s harder to properly strategize and subvert a nation when you’re driven by fear and loathing to a pitched hysteria. Their desperation to maintain control of the horizontal and the vertical is making them sloppy. Anti-White Noise is leaking through the screen.

Ironsides is right. Anti-White hatred is channeled through Trump, which explains why the rage against Trump is so unhinged; (((they))) and their shitlib Gentile useful idiots who never met a phony virtue they didn’t want to signal correctly perceive in the phenomenon of Trump a resurrecting White consciousness and awareness of the malice that is directed against them.

Sound familiar?  That is what I’ve been saying here at EGI Notes for several years, most recently on June 29, 2018;

Thus, based on these perceptions, I have argued that hatred of Trump (and his staff) is a proxy for hatred for Whites; thus, all the sweaty, hateful fetishes and fantasies these people (including White leftists) harbor toward Whites comes out in their unhinged demented fury at the leftist Trump and his SJW staff.  Perceptions, it is all perceptions.

Therefore, given the genocidal animus these folks have for Whites, is it no wonder they pose with mockups of a decapitated Trump head or say “Fuck Trump” at a media-covered celebrity event or shoot up a GOP congressional baseball practice or attack Trump supporters (with Sessions providing legal cover) or harass Trump staff wherever and whenever they show themselves in public?

You see, to these people, including Homo erectus Maxine, Whites have been getting too uppity recently.  They are not quietly and humbly accepting the steady march toward White dispossession.  The perception of Trump has thrown a monkey (no pun intended) wrench into the multicultural apparatus and the Guks and their White traitor allies are enraged at the temerity of these Whites. Why doesn’t the lowly White Man know his place?  Sit down and shut up, Whitey!

That explains much I think.

Once again: the quota queens eventually end up repeating Sallisian memes – weeks, months, or even years later.  It’s a form of plagiarism, really.

From MPC:

Lol at the alt-right viciously harrassing a young asian woman. 

With what? Marriage proposals and paypig offerings?

Good to see that some people are noticing what Sallis has been talking about – the Yellow Fever of the Alt Right.

Podcast representing the bulk of the financial support going into activist coffers. Taylor is painfully naïve concerning the judicial system.  What is going to happen to Fields and to Spencer’s lawsuit is anyone’s guess, but my guess is that I’m real skeptical it is going to turn out well.  Comparing Fields to Zimmerman fails at many levels; regardless of the “White Hispanic” nonsense of the controlled media, the reality to the jurors was of a Hispanic defending himself from a violent Negro (to eliminate redundancy: a Negro) attacking him.  Fields, regardless of the circumstances, is viewed as a White Nutzi and that alone, even ignoring his actions, is sufficient for a typical jury to convict him of virtually anything.  One wonders how aggressively his “counsel” is going to defend him, as well.  As regards the civil suit against Beavis and Butthead – that’s so absurd it should have been immediately thrown out of court.  That is wasn’t tells you much about “judicial fairness and integrity.”

On all the other issues discussed though, Taylor made more sense than Brimelow, which is of course not at all surprising.  By the way, Pete, “Razib” is not an Indian, but a Bengali, and he does not write “ably” on genetics or anything else.  He’s the idiot who once confused homologous chromosomes and sister chromatids.

Prior generations of White leaders betrayed us, and the levers of power and money in the West are no longer in our hands. We must choose a strategy carefully, as we most likely will not have a second chance.

Agreed. That’s why the decades of wasted opportunities – in part due to Pierce and the National Alliance – has been so devastating.  And why the affirmative action policy has to end.

We must awaken a new generation of our people. We must inspire the superior minds among them. We cannot do that by reviving the distant past of our race, no matter how much we can and do honor it. 

We also cannot do that by reviving the recent past, either, whether that includes the general problem of fossilized “movement” dogma, or the specific issue of trying to revive the National Alliance, which effectively died with Pierce.

We cannot do that by ignoring the exponential increase in human knowledge that has been brought about in the last century — knowledge of the genetic structure that makes us what we are, and knowledge of the structure of reality itself.

That knowledge invalidates a significant portion of “movement” dogma, including the HBD fraud (hello, Rushton).

None of the strategies I have enumerated so far seems likely to revolutionize the moral thinking of the superior fraction of our population — the fraction that can actually get things done and change this filthy excuse for a society into something great and noble again.

None of the “movement” strategies of the last 50 years, including those extant today are likely to do so either.

But there is another choice.

Yes, dump the quota queens and actualize meritocracy within racial activism.  Dump the dogma and try something new.

The authors are clear that this could never have developed if females’ estrus was clear for all see and if human females, like female swans, were evolved to be monogamous. But this is the crucial point. Human females are not evolved to be monogamous. They’re evolved to be, albeit cunningly, “polyandrous”: marry the kindly Beta male if you must but get pregnant by the Alpha one.

Grant and Montrose argued that patriarchy is, therefore, entirely understandable in evolutionary terms…

Not surprisingly, the attitude of VDARE toward Antifa Jeff is different than that of EGI Notes.  We both agree that his behavior is “amazing” though.