And other news. In all cases, emphasis added.
Happy Saint Adolf’s Day, April 20, 2021.
This is American Renaissance:
John Smith
Anybody who isn’t an Anglo-Saxon of Northern European descent with light skin is a person of color.
George Clooney is fully Northern European but he sure as hell isn’t very “White”? Is he? I’ve seen Sicillians and Jews who are whiter then Clooney.
The French and other Southern European nations were all ruled by the Roman Empire which was mixed race. Including big parts of Southern Germany.
White people are Norweigans, Danes, Swedes, Dutch, Northern Germans, English, Irish and Scottish who have LIGHT skin. Anybody not listed is “a person of color”. Even those Eastern Europeans who have a lot of Central Asian admixture.
Not only are Southern and Eastern Europeans all non-White admixed cringing mongrels, but even darker Northern Europeans like George Clooney are non-White as well. Dat Right!
The Alt Right seems to have been enriched with younger Type I ethnic fetishists, people who indeed seem involved in activism to make up for personal deficiencies and who have little else other than their racial identities. Thus, among the majority of these “activists” who are Herrenvolk, there’s a tendency toward an exaggerated Nordicism, and a navel-gazing focus on their own ethnicity. We can then understand why hostility toward non-Nordic Europeans, fueled by the narcissism of small differences, is increasing…
That seems to fit “John Smith” very well. One can imagine him as some fellow playing video games in his mother’s basement, looking into a mirror from time to time to admire his light complexion, and obsessing over his Northwest European Celto-Germanic heritage, without which he would have nothing except his video game scores and the semen stains on the front of his sweat pants from jacking off to anime.
Some may say that comments like that of “John Smith” are so extreme and absurd (e.g., George Clooney [and other “Paleo-Atlantid” Northern Europeans] is “non-White”) that they are likely from anti-White, leftist trolls trying to be divisive. But that’s the point, isn’t it – Nordicism becomes so ridiculous that one cannot with certainty distinguish a genuine Nordicist from leftist trolling. The ends result is the same.
I call Jeelvy a “Turko-Albanian” as a joke – mocking ridicule – to puncture his pretensions, but, alas, to the Herrenvolk, that designation is all too real:
FortunatusApril 19, 2021 at 6:38 am
Being a closed club, is not the same as having a national soul. The mafia is a closed club too. I thought you were talking about a meaningful nationalism based on blood on soil and a national soul and a national culture.
We are here discussing the problems of White people. And from my observation (I am a German living in Germany, which after 1945 was turned by the victors into a dumping ground for the riffraff of the world) the people of the Balkans often are somewhat Mischlinge between Turcs and Europeans proper. The occupation of the region by Turcs for centuries clearly had an influence on the gene pool, and at the end to Antiquity there was a fertility crisis of epic proportion, so I assume some Mischlinge from the East settled in that vacuum. So it would be very wrong to think the ancestors of your people fought in a phalanx with Alexander the Great.
So for me it is an open question what role the people of the Balkans can play in a discussion of a nationalism of White people. I don’t want to be divisive. So perhaps one can avoid this discussion.
But when someone from the Balkans comes along and denies Europeans in a very al fresco discussion of history their national identity (you seem completely ignore the fact that regional identity can coexist with a national identity), this will provoke some reaction from someone who knows a thing or two about your people.
I can understand where Jeelvy’s obnoxious posturing offends people, like this German, but the problem is that other Balkanoids are not responsible for Jeelvy’s stupid antics. Thus, because of his (justified) anger toward Jeelvy, this (alleged, self-described) German reveals his own hidden animus toward Balkan peoples. We see the typical Herrenvolk assumption that everyone else is admixed, but they themselves are pure, an assumption I have repeatedly challenged here.
In any event, we see the typical outcome of when people engage in ethnic gamesmanship – it antagonizes other people, who make their own offensive comments, and we get never-ending cycles of ethnic animus. Jeelvy is a master at starting these cycles of offense. Assuming he’s not doing it intentionally, then the man’s an idiot.
Nick JeelvyApril 19, 2021 at 5:16 am
Bulgaria got its name from the Bulgars and its language from Slavs, but they are the same people more or less who’ve lived there for centuries – i. e. Thracians.
Incorrect. See this. See this figure. Now, that figure should NOT be taken literally, as it suffers from the same basic problems as supervised admixture analyses, both in the literature and from the testing companies – the choice of parental populations used will determine how the findings are structured. Interpreting the same populations with a different set of reference samples would yield a different set of ancestral components and percentages. That said, the data (such as they are), combined with other studies, and taking into account history, strongly suggest a significant contribution of Slavic ancestry to the Bulgarian genepool. The following seems reasonable:
Early gene flows between southeastern and eastern Europe make it difficult to obtain a correct estimate, although young enough identical by descent segments confirmed such connection and that the East and West Slavs share more identical by descent segments with South Slavs than with Greeks, inter-Slavic populations (a group of Romanians, Gagauz), but less with Balts, while the South Slavs share similar number with East and West Slavs, but fewer with Greeks.
I think most likely that the Bulgarians are mostly mix of indigenous Balkan (Thracian and other groups) and Slavic ancestry, with some fractional ancestry from Bulgars and other groups. But that is only my opinion, my interpretation, and I could be wrong. Unlike Der Retards of Der Movement, I don’t make definitive claims on subjects like this, claiming my opinion is a “fact” that “everyone knows.” I do think though that there is a general consensus among those that study Bulgarian ancestry that there is a Slavic component, but that component is less than what is found in, e.g., Poles.
More on the stupid Jeelvy article:
FortunatusApril 16, 2021 at 4:06 pm
It is never classy to allege that your audience is full of monsters created by propaganda and other evil means after their basic national soul has been destroyed, whereas oneself is the real thing.
I am pretty sure one could say very bad things about modern Macedonians as well. I did a quick picture search and what I saw was not a very pretty sight. If they have preserved their national soul, why do they wear the same garbage clothes like everybody in the West? And I am sure that the Macedonia youth does not sing the song of their ancestors while they annoy as expats others in the West (why did they emigrate, if they have preserved their blood-and-soil-nationalism?).
But I am not here to denigrate you, since I think you are a half decent writer, but this stupid bragging was a bit much.
PhoenixApril 17, 2021 at 3:45 pm
Yea, the Macedonian arrogance thing was laughable.
Also, this guy seems to be unaware that America was a mixture of different European ethnicities at it’s founding.
That last comment is completely consistent with my previous statements about how Europeans know very little about America and American history. Then they complain how the “Yanks” and the “Hamburgers” know nothing about Europe. Pot, kettle.
eginotes 
You must be logged in to post a comment.